►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-05-19]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Recording
is
on
welcome
to
geek
style
governance.
Discussion
for
wednesday
may
19
1500
utc
today
is
also
my
one
year
anniversary
on
dow
talk,
there's
a
little
cake
next
to
my
username.
A
So
for
other
I
don't
know
if
others
have
experienced
that
or
something
to
look
forward
as
a
nice
little
present
from
from
down
talk,
but
starting
with
the
proposal,
roundup,
there's
four
proposal:
proposals
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
mainnet
geeks
out
treasury
verification,
number
17,
this
one's
to
susd
and
usdt
we've
done
we'd
transfer.
A
I
think
we
had
done
one
on
monday
for
usdc
there's
claiming
funds
for
deployment
as
a
reimbursement
of
some
of
the
address
that
had
funded
a
lot
of
contract
deployments
for
geeksdow,
and
then
there
is
the
safe
multi-call
installation
and
the
open,
multi-call
installation.
So
the
safe
multi-call
installation
is
actually
slated
to
pass
this
evening.
A
I
think
like
7
or
8
pm,
so
that's
a
really
exciting
development,
which
will
let
us
let
the
excel
interact
with
a
certain
number
of
a
white
listed
number
of
of
smart
contracts
to
be
able
to
do
a
whole
bunch
of
things,
and
so
this
will
be.
I
think
the
gp
relayer,
the
swapper
liquidity
relay
the
swapper
farming
relayer.
A
I
think
that's,
I
think
that
might
be
it,
but
that
that's
exciting
and
then
the
open,
multi-call
installation
allows
geekdow
to
interact
with
arbitrary,
smart
contracts,
but
it's
a
much
longer
period,
and
so
that
just
got
boosted.
I
think
two
days
ago
and
that'll
be
up
for
like
another
12
12
days.
There.
B
A
Contractor
payoff
proposal,
there's
fluid
drop
a
worker
proposal
payment.
There
is
the
xtxt
buyback
number
two
funding
proposals
is
11.13
wef
and
then
the
corresponding
multi-call
proposal
to
actually
place
the
order
on
nosis
protocol
and
then
cure
for
xero's
worker
payout
proposal,
skymine
labs,
contributor
proposal,
and
then
we,
the
geekstop
community
competition
for
owning
markets
batch
number
two.
A
So
this
is
a
proposal
that
sets
aside
ten
thousand
dollars
and
point
five
percent
rep
for
a
competition
to
source
omen
markets
and
that's
all
happens
through
alchemy
on
x,
die
and
sky
has
been
leading
that,
and
so
that
will
be
pass.
I
think,
on
thursday
evening
there
and
that'll
launch
that
off.
I
think
it's
10
days,
the
competition
runs
for
10
days
and
it
actually
does
require
voting
by
rep
holders
to
pick
the
best
markets.
A
So
that
will
be
some
additional
voting
after
that,
after
that
part
closes.
When
is
that,
when
does
like
the
competition
close,
I
guess
guys.
So
there
would
be
like
another
round
of
voting
for
rep
holders.
B
Yeah,
the
well
on
the
on
the
day
that
the
entry
period
ends
the
the
voting
period
kicks
off
for
like
six
days.
So
it's
it's
easier
to
see
the
dates
on
there.
Okay,
yeah,
I
have
awake.
I
should
have
just
done
this
sorry.
A
June,
2nd
so
it'll
be
like
10
days,
yeah
june,
2nd
from
there
and
then.
A
Yeah
I've
just
seen
martin's
comment
the
chat
about
lee
that
had
been
because
that's
a
resolution
to
that.
B
B
B
For
for
the
winners
of
those
markets,
because
some
of
the
the
funds
that
are
that
are
in
that
like
are,
are
available
right
now,
some
is
being
used
in
current
markets
and
there's
also
some
ideas
floating
around,
which
omen
squad
has
been
looking
at
refining
like
what
they
will
be
and
then
would
probably
share
with
a
wider
group
like
around
a
bunch
of
different
flipping
markets.
A
Yeah,
I
I
guess
it's
been.
I
mean
it's
been
a
couple
months
since
omen
squad
was
received
funding.
I
think
it
was
like
january
or
february
so,
like
I
guess.
Some
of
that
has
been
replenished
and
kind
of
reused,
but
maybe
there's
another
round
of
those
that's
specific
to
both
the
competition
markets
we
have
and
the
flipping
there
yeah.
B
We'll
try
to
give
a
report
on
like
the
state
of
the
of
like
what
the
funds
are.
I
think
there's
like
been
a
slight
bleed
like
lpa
markets
like
some
have
been
successful,
most
have
been
average
and
some
have
been
a
little
bit
of
losses
so,
like
some
of
that
is
like
you
could
write
off
as
market
expense,
but
it's
not
like
most
of
the
funds
that
have
been
given
in
lp
to
markets
like
most
of
it
is
still
available
like
it's
not
like
there
has.
B
There
haven't,
hasn't,
been
big
big
losses
or
anything.
So
a
report
like
the
that's
probably
due
for
a
report
on
that
and
then
additional
funding
for
like
like
what
we've
heard
from
feedback.
I
know
this
is
not
specific
governance
but
we've
like
more.
We
need
more
markets
and
we
need
more
interesting
markets
and
things
and
and
that's
why
some
users
don't
come
to
omen
because
there's
more
markets
on
poly
market
right,
there's
more
interesting
ones
there.
B
So
we
just
need
more
markets
in
general,
I
think,
and
ideally
those
become
user
created
markets
with
omen
token
and
things
like
that.
But
for
now
I
think
it's
worth
a
certain
amount
of
money
to
like
push
like
just
have
a
better
curated
experience
for
all
men,
so
yeah.
A
Yeah,
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
see
a
proposal
on
that
funding.
Those
maybe
laying
out
the
both
the
flipping
and
the
omen
competition.
They
could
probably
get
funded
before
before
then
yeah
and
then
the
report
you
did
last
night.
That
was
actually
pretty
interesting
too.
Just
from
like
understanding
how
omen
liquidity,
provisioning
works
and
like
some
of
those
things,
and
that
that
is
just
interesting,
I
think
for
the
community
to
have
too.
A
A
Somewhat
related
to
that,
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
put
the
put
a
dowel
talk
post
in
but
sky.
If
we
are
doing
like
that
type
of
request
from
xdi,
we
do
need
to
think
about
like
some
of
the
exp.
The
expenditures
that
xdi
base
is
kind
of,
like
racking
up,
are
they're
doing
some
of
the
larger
ones.
A
I
guess
you
think
about,
like
the
opolis
grant,
from
dx
style
xcx
down
and
even
some
of
the
buyback
proposals
that
we're
doing
from
then
there
and
then,
if
we
were
funding
the
omen
markets,
competition
that
would
just
be
a
larger
amount.
So
I
think
we
actually
probably
need
another
fun
transfer
proposal
that
is
really
focused
on
like
replenishing
xdi,
for
the
opolis
grant,
investment,
which
is
100
000
xdi.
The
farming
campaigns
that
we
want
to
launch
for
beta.
A
That's
going
to
take
a
good
chunk
of
eth
to
be
able
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
hopefully
get
the
dxd
from
the
buyback,
but
we
need
some
more
we'll
need
to
replenish
the
e
in
x,
dx,
dow,
that
is
being
used
to
buy
back
dxd,
and
then
I
guess
for
like
this
omen,
one
that
will
be
like
another
one
to
be
able
to
transfer
transfer
funds
there
and
then
just
like
quickly
on
that
we
actually
have
more
usdc
than
xdi
in
xd
style.
Now.
A
So,
if
you're
doing
your
work
proposal-
and
you
prefer
to
take
usdc
like
just
for
the
next
couple
weeks-
would
probably
be
easier
for
you
to
take
ustc.
If
that's
your
on-ramp
just
because
we
have
a
bit
more
of
that
in
there
right
now,.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point.
Some
of
those
things
you
mentioned
like
stuff
going
into
swapper
and
stuff,
or
obviously
some
of
those
things
really.
You
need
to
have
like
the
funding
on
on
xdi
already
there's
a
couple
things
so
like
we
call
these
like
fractal
squads
or
whatever
like
omen
squad,
has
the
ability
to
just
make
that
request
on
mainnet
and
and
transfer
it
over
into
its
usage
on
x
die
itself.
So
it
doesn't
need
that
that
proposal
can
actually
happen
on
mainnet.
B
So
maybe
it's
better
to
do
that
and
then
we
marketing
qualcomm's
squad
and
keenan
and
team
are
have
been
contemplating
a
marketing
comms
squad
multi-sig,
which
could
have
like
maybe
50
grand
that
was
ready
to
deploy,
like
a
priest
like
preset
things
like,
like
five
thousand
dollars
to
a
hackathon
prize
or
a
three
thousand
dollar
bounty,
but
like
it's,
it's
ideally
there's
an
allocation.
B
That's
already
set
aside
in
like
a
marketing,
multisig
and-
and
we
were
talking
about,
should
that
be
on
x,
die
or
on
mainnet,
and
I
think
so
far
we
think
having
that
on
main
net
is
actually
probably
the
better
place
to
have
it,
because
it's
really
just
you
put
that
money
there
and
then,
like
you,
you're
gonna
have
one-off
sends
of
a
few
thousand
dollars.
For
certain
reasons
to
like
and
and
and
most
people
will
want
that
money
on
mainnet
and
won't
want
that
on
xdi.
B
A
Yeah
and
some
of
it's
just
about
a
rebalancing
right
because
there's
a
we
have
a
consistent
amount
of
contributor
payouts
that
we're
doing
in
exercise.
So
we
kind
of
know
how
much
that's
going
to
be
every
month.
But
if
there's
like
one-off
expenditures,
that's
a
little
bit
harder
to
plan
for,
and
I
think
like
right
now.
We
basically
have
transfer
funds,
2x
die
for
operational
cost,
and
then
we
have
transfer
funds
to
swapper
on
xdi,
which
is
kind
of
like
a
separate
thing
right,
that's
a
separate
proposal.
A
That's
not
those
are
those
are
going
through
different
things
and
then
maybe
we
do
have
like
another
for
omen
squad
or
something
where
they're
getting
or
getting
more
specific
funding.
But
I
think
in
a
lot
of
ways
in
terms
of
difference
between
maine
and
xdi.
It's
probably
just
mostly
about
the
cost
like
if
it's
a
big
expenditure,
it's
probably
just
better.
It's
fine
to
do
it
on
main
net
because
that's
like
where
the
funds
are
and
that's
where
we
don't
have
to
worry
about
doing
like
another
rebalancing
effort.
A
But
if
it
is
like
coming
on,
x,
died,
and
that
means
we're.
Gonna
have
to
work
through
the
proposals
that
have
previously
sent
funds
to
xdi
or
like
try
to
work
on
another
one
that
gets
there
there.
So.
B
Yeah
cool,
like
most
points
still
most
like
internal,
like
external
parties,
like
a
sponsorship
of
some
event
or
a
hackathon
or
like
whatever,
like
any
of
those
like
site
or
a
bounty
of
someone
making.
I
guess
a
bounty
could
be
extinct
but
like
a
lot
of
those
external
ones,
they're
gonna
want
like
if
you're
gonna
pay
in
crypto
they're
gonna
want
a
main
net
payment.
Not
like
not
everyone.
Just
like
a
an
event
or
something
doesn't
take
x,
die
right,
so
those
chunks
would
probably
be
made
in
that
chunks.
A
A
Moving
on,
there
were
some
recently
passed
proposals,
two
pretty
important
ones
between
our
the
last
government
discussion,
this
one,
and
that
was
the
first
dxd
buyback
order.
So
this
was
completed
on
xdi
through
the
two
separate
proposals,
the
funding
proposal
and
then
the
multi-call
scheme,
I
think
required
80
txt,
that
is
in
the
mesa
protocol.
I
mean
yeah
it's
in
the
gnosis
protocol
on
xdi.
Now,
as
I
said
before,
there's
a
the
second
order
is
boosted
and
should
go
through
in
three
days.
A
I
actually
just
submitted
the
first
funding
proposal
for
the
second
for
the
third
buyback
this
this
morning
and
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
do
the
the
multi-goal
scheme
one,
but
I'll
do
that
later
this
afternoon
and
then,
hopefully
tomorrow,
once
the
multi-call
scheme
is
installed
on
main
net,
we
can
conduct
the
first
dxd
buyback
on
on
mainnet
there
and
so
that'll
be
the
kind
of
same
process.
A
There
just
a
reminder
that
if
you
did
vote
on
those
two
majority
vote
proposals,
they
will
you
need
to
go
and
redeem
your
rep
to
be
able
to
reclaim
that
there.
A
Cool
and
then
just
some
a
couple
other
things
in
the
proposal:
cue,
slash
forum,
post,
didn't
know
if
anyone
and
they
thought
so.
There
is
the
jordan
worker
proposal
for
mid-may
to
july
31st
and
a
forum
post
that
he
had
about
working
on
some
kyc
aml
things.
Tammy
have
replied
to
that,
and
then
there
is
the
roy
payment
final
payment.
A
I
think
for
the
period
which
has
been
there
for
a
bit
and
I
didn't
see
it
boosted
on
on
main
net
and
then
fluid
drop
submitted,
the
treasury
diversification
number
18
to
usdc
and
those
are
currently
those
are
not
boosted
but
proposals
there.
So
I
wasn't
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
comments
on
those.
A
Cool
okay
next
is
rep
boost,
so
continuing.
I
think
this
is
the
eighth
eighth
month
of
rep
boos
sky
started
with
the
the
burning
man
ideology.
I
guess
was
like
the
inspiration,
but
anyway,
this
is
the
seventh
ones
is
a
good
way
of
just
kind
of
trying
to
encourage
reward
any
new
community
members
that
should
be
recognized
in
terms
of
kind
of
invite
them
into
geeks
now
governance.
So
I
did
two
people
that
I
thought
had
been
kind
of
helpful.
A
The
last
month
or
interesting,
luigi
lemon
who's
been
on
the
discord
and
also
coming
to
key
base
who's
involved
in
the
honey
community.
I
think,
has
been
really
kind
of
fun.
I
guess
a
little
bit,
but
also
just
like
helpful
in
terms
of
like
showing
how
we
can
kind
of
maybe
work
with
other
community
members
and
then
see
megan
or
hen
who's
hypnosis,
who
I
just
you
know
the
last
couple
weeks
has
been
reappearing
he's
a
long
time.
A
Member
has
kind
of
been
involved
in
a
lot
of
different
things,
but
just
last
month
or
so,
I
think,
he's
been
more
involved
and
so
I'd
be
good
to
see
him
get
get
more
involved
further
and
so
yeah.
Those
are
the
two
that
I
have.
So
if
you
have
any
others,
if
you
have
any
others,
shoot
them
to
the
forum
post
and
just
reminded
there
is
a
separate
program
or
additional
program.
The
discord
rep
boost,
which
is
rewarded
quarterly.
A
So
we
are
tracking,
like
kind
of
most
of
the
general
discord
like
rep
contributions,
there's
been
a
lot
of
really
good
ones.
I
think,
even
like
the
omen
and
swapper
channels,
a
a
lot
more
activity
as
people
are
being
been
coming
in,
so
we
do
catch
a
little
bit
with
those
and
so
but
definitely
open
to
other
community
members
that
have
been
contributing
in
different
ways
or
starting
to
contribute
and
then
just
shoot
nominations
to
the
forum
post.
A
A
But
all
of
the
some
of
the
market
market
stuff
was
delayed
that,
but
this
is
just
I'm
gonna,
write
a
post
today
about
trying
to
lay
out
some
steps
on
on
how
we
can
get
individual
contributors
to
do
the
rep
sync
updates
trying
to
do
it
once
there
are
three
months
of
rep
awards
to
to
sync
and
lay
that
out
with
the
with
the
spreadsheet
there
that
we
could
do
that,
but
hopefully
get
that
started
in
the
next
week
or
so
so
we
can
figure
out
how
to
get
some
of
those
mainnet
rep
rewards,
while
also
working
on
the
the
long-term
way
of
doing
multiple
batches
of
rep.
A
Rewards
next
up
is
treasury
diversification.
Update
dave,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
speak
or
you
were
today,
but
just
as
a
I
do
have
the
ability
to
speak.
I
didn't
know.
C
Of
course
yeah
no,
I
mean,
as
you
mentioned
before,
already
right.
We
have
two
already
live
on
alchemy
of
course,
today
a
very
hectic
day
given
the
market,
but
we
have
one
going
through
soon.
Well,
actually,
it
still
needs
a
vote.
I
believe
it
had
three
days
left
on
it,
and
that
was,
as
you
mentioned,
to
synthetic
us
dollar
and
usdt,
and
then
we
have
another
which
I
submitted.
C
I
believe
on
monday,
which
was
number
18,
and
this
was
actually
to
usdc
and
the
ether
amount
at
the
time
of
submitting
the
proposal
was
actually
slightly
higher,
then
what
we
actually
need
to
fill
a
usdc
amount.
C
It
is
not
anymore,
so
maybe
I
jinxed
the
whole
thing
by
doing
that,
but
the
idea
was
to
do
the
first
transaction,
where
we
actually
at
the
point
where
the
funds
get
transferred
to
the
multisig.
We
look
at
the
current
rate,
so
we
make
sure
we
execute
the
treasury
diversification
proposal
exactly
to
the
two
million
dollar
amount
we
set
and
then
the
rest
of
the
eth
would
just
be
returned
to
the
treasury
but
yeah
as
things
stand
now.
That
is
not
the
case
and
well.
C
I
would
be
submitting
the
next
one
end
of
this
week
as
well,
and
actually
one
thing
somewhat
related.
I
was
also
exploring
the
idea
of
maybe
setting
up
like
a
treasury
ethereum
wallet,
so
I
think
often
these
trades.
They
are
even
if
we
have
very
high
gas
prices,
like
let's
say
500
or
a
thousand
dollars
to
submit
a
transaction,
and
when
we're
trading
a
million
dollars,
it's
still
a
marginal
amount.
C
So,
but
that's
also
something
of
course
I
post
on
the
forum
and
ask
feedback
for
so,
for
example,
deploying
refund
smart
contracts,
which
was
like
a
thousand
two
hundred
east
the
other
day
or
submitting
a
proposal,
a
thousand
eth,
even
though
these
get
refunded,
of
course,
there's
a
percentage.
Only
that
get
refunded-
and
I
think
the
idea
is
also
not
to
delay
stuff
right.
So
when
we
had
really
high
ease
prices,
I
was,
of
course,
also
delaying
them
by
myself,
because
I
was
like
you
know.
C
I
don't
want
to
pay
the
10
out
of
pocket,
so
a
smart
contract
wallet
with
ether
that
can
be
executed
by
the
extour
members.
If
we
can
submit
proposals
like
that
anything
works
right,
but
just
something
I
was
taking
a
look
at.
A
C
B
So
real,
quick,
the
the
treasury
management
operations,
which
mainly
you
know,
had
been
like
the
largest
costs,
have
been
executing
the
multi-state
transactions,
but
obviously
there's
the
funding
proposals
which
happen
on
alchemy
before
you
get
to
the
money
to
the
multi-stake.
To
then
do
this
stuff
there
already
was
money
allocated
and
should
be
more
money
allocated
to
all
the
costs
100
of
the
cost
of
the
treasury
risk
management
stuff.
B
So
if,
if
what
fluid
drop
is
saying
is
like
we've
been
missing
the
the
10
of
costs
that
are
refunded
for
the
treasury
management,
like
funding
proposals,
we
need
to
take
the
money
which
we
allocated
for
covering
all
of
those
costs
which
were
usually
paid
out
after
people
like
front
of
the
cost.
B
But
you
could
just
give
a
certain
amount
of
each
like
couple,
eth
to
the
people
that
are
making
those
proposals
and
then
the
people
that
are
executing
the
multi-state
transactions
right,
but
those
costs
were
being
tracked
and
were
reimbursed
at
least
for
the
multi-sig
transactions.
B
But
we
were
ignoring
the
full
amount
for
the
the
alchemy
funding
proposals
related
to
those
multi-stake
transactions.
So
really
yeah.
You
could
just
up
front
a
bit
of
gas
money
to
the
people
that
are
making
those
proposals
and,
if
dave
is
making
most
of
those
proposals,
I
guess
it's
the
10
yeah
that
needs
to
be
up
front,
but.
C
Yeah-
and
I
mean
smart,
like
the
multi-sig,
the
sorry,
the
gas
governance
refund
contracts
as
well.
It's
like
I
don't
know
it's.
It's
obviously
not
that
regular,
but
I
mean
just
recently,
of
course,
I
think
submitting
a
proposal
on
outcomes
like
six
seven
hundred
dollars
and
it's
fine.
I
can
put
it
up
front,
but
you
know
when
it's
two
a
week
it
starts
adding
up,
but
also,
I
know
the
idea
was
floated
of
even
adding.
C
Perhaps
a
treasury
account
so
to
speak
to
the
multisig,
and
in
that
case
the
same
address
could
also
be
used
as
the
final
confirmation
to
the
multisig,
which
would
carry
all
the
gas
costs
of
the
trade
right,
if
I
recall
correctly
how
multisigs
work
and
then
that
address
just
wouldn't
get
any
refunds
at
all,
so
to
speak
right.
So
when
the
multi-sig
reforms
are
calculated,
this
address
just
wouldn't
get
refunds,
because
the
cost
was
upfront
so
to
speak.
Right.
B
C
A
Mean
just
more
of
like
the
the
hours
of
that
sometimes
get
part
of
the
reason
the
multisig
is
so
you
can
have
different
different
people.
Do.
D
I
would
just
say
like
so
we
are
so
we
already
have
some
reimbursements
for
the
multi-state
expenses.
We
have
the
reimbur
refunds
for
like
90
of
governance
like
actions,
but
I
mean,
I
think,
a
simple
solution
to
this
dave.
D
Like
a
lot
of
us
here,
have
you
know
various
overhead
costs
that
they
incur
in
their
work,
and
you
could
simply
request
upfront
like
a
certain
amount
of
money
in
your
work
or
proposal,
a
certain
amount
of
eth
like
front
fees,
these
gas
costs
and
stuff
because
yeah,
obviously
like
you
know,
the
dow
should
be
enabling
people
to
get
their
work
done,
and
so
I
think,
whatever
the
you
know,
the
simplest
thing
is
to
simply
include
it
in
your
worker
component.
C
E
Yeah
and
also
include
like
guys,
which
declares
that,
like
once
you're,
actually
not
being
full
time
anymore,
that
you
like
send
out
the
remaining
ease
back
to
the
and
then
we
should
be
good
to
go.
Yeah.
Of
course,.
C
A
I
one
question
on
so
we're
talking
about
treasury
diversification
so
with
the
open
multi-call
scheme
being
installed-
and
I
guess
this
is
probably
a
question
for
john-
if
we
were
going
to
interact
with
compound,
do
we
need
a
separate
relayer
to
interact
with
compound
right
that
we're
sending
like
how
we
do
with
all
the
other,
with
all
the
other,
I
guess
with
swapper
and
other
and
other
ones
where
we're
extending
funds
to
relay
and
then
the
relay
itself
is
like
depositing
funds.
Yeah.
D
So
the
open
multicall
can
interact
with
any
contract.
The
problem
that
we
have
with
the
current
governance
framework
is
like
calling
it
you
can't
call
the
approves
directly
so
something
doing
the
full
suite
of
things
with
compound
would
require
a
real
error.
D
Wouldn't
it
wouldn't
be
a
complicated
contract
to
create
an
implement
right
like
it
would
be
doing
a
few
simple
things
and
of
course
we
would
still
need
to
get
it
audited,
because
it
would
be
handling
a
lot
of
money
from
the
dow
but
yeah.
We.
We
wouldn't
need
that.
A
D
A
Yeah,
I
mean
maybe
urine
too
just
because
somebody
did
the
v2.
I
think
specifically
said
those
three
and
like
authorized
the
use
of
those
three
so
we'd
probably
just
be
limited
to
those.
A
F
Yeah
thanks
chris,
as
we've
been
discussing
over
the
past
few
weeks,
the
search
for
our
next
marketing
lead
continues.
We
are
definitely
making
progress
in
our
search
and
have
been
reviewing
a
lot
of
strong
candidates
and
for
those
who
are
interested
in
the
people
we
have
been
in
communication
with.
I
will
link
a
few
candidates
in
the
chat
of
the
people
who
are
moving
through
through
the
next
steps
of
the
interview
process.
Right
now,.
F
And
then
those
are
just
their
linkedin
pages.
If
you
guys
wanted
to
to
take
a
look.
Also,
this
week
we
made
an
addition
to
our
swapper
team.
Ola
sander,
a
developer
contracted
from
ethworks
will
be
joining
us
and
contributing
to
front-end
development
with
swapper
over
the
past
few
days.
That
and
I
have
been
onboarding
him
and
I
believe
today
he's
already
started
his
first
tasks.
F
So
if
you
see
him
around,
definitely
give
him
a
welcome
and
then
lastly,
I
want
to
discuss
the
contributor
compensation
structure
at
dx
style,
we're
beginning
the
process
of
re-examining
the
compensation
structure,
everything
from
re-evaluating
contributor
levels
and
compensation
and
dye
and
dxd.
This
is
a
huge
task
and
I
know
we've
been
talking
about
how
adjustments
should
be
made
for
a
while.
F
So
please,
if
this
is
an
initiative,
you
have
input
or
any
ideas
about
just
reach
out
to
me,
and
let
me
know
in
addition
today
in
our
contributor
ux
meeting
right
after
this
call
we'll
be
discussing
this
in
more
detail.
So,
if
you're
available
to
join,
we
would
appreciate
your
thoughts
and
input,
hopefully
by
next
week.
We'll
have
some
more
details
around
this.
As
well,.
A
Cool,
thank
you.
Next
up,
it's
actually
similar
to
some
of
the
discussion
about
the
the
kind
of
funding
different
costs,
but
tammy
had
a
request
for
a
subscription.
I
think
it
was
the
bloomberg
law
to
be
able
to
kind
of
get
some
do
some
research
to
conduct
some
information,
and
I
think
this
kind
of
brings
up
some
other
things
about
like
subscription
services
in
general
and
how
like
certain
contributors,
need
access
to
different
resources,
and
how
are
we,
how
is
dick
style
funding
and
enabling
those
so
tammy?
G
Yeah,
no
thanks
chris,
so
it
kind
of
actually
goes
hand
in
hand
with
jordan's
proposal,
though
he
like
was,
you
know,
introduced
through
sky
and
he
actually
has
like
a
lot
of
great
technical
skills
as
far
as
statistical
research.
G
He
has
this
really
interesting
background
kind
of
in
the
mlkyc
blockchain
analysis
area,
and
it's
kind
of
like
perfect
timing
to,
for
me
at
least
kind
of,
as
things
have
been
moving
closer
to
a
good
place,
with
omen
guild
to
kind
of
get
into
more
traditional
compliance,
legal
type
tasks
that
things
that
I
would
normally
maybe
take
on.
As
in
more
of
like
a
attorney
position
with
another
company,
and
usually
when
I,
when
I
do
stuff
like
this,
I
I
tend
to
have
a
subscription
to
a
legal
service.
G
So
usually,
if
you
guys
are
at
all
familiar
with
this,
which
I
don't
expect
you
to
be-
that's
lexus
nexus,
westlaw,
that's
what
you
would
use.
If
you're
like
a
trial
attorney,
I
would
say,
for
transactional
attorneys,
it's
frequently
bloomberg,
so
I
just
basically
met
with
a
you
know:
a
service
provider
and
got
a
quote.
The
quote
for
an
annual
subscription
is
just
under
it's
like
six
thousand
nine
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
G
I
can
do
quarterly
payments
of
it,
which
comes
out
to
approximately
seventeen
hundred
dollar
dollars
for
every
three
months
of
the
service,
so
that
could
make
a
lot
of
sense,
and
I
can
either
kind
of
like
dave
was
discussing,
put
it
in
a
part
as
a
part
of
my
worker
proposal,
so
it
can
be
approved
by
the
down
a
quarterly
basis,
or
something
else
we
can
do
is
talk
about
other
subscription
services
that
others
might
be
paying
for.
G
I
referenced
this
to
chris
earlier
today,
because
I
wanted
to
get
it
on
the
governance
discussion
for
everyone
to
kind
of
give
feedback
on,
but
I
think
we
pay
for
doing
analytics
ether
scan
subscriptions
as
well.
Things
like
that
that
might
be
kind
of
like
an
overhead
cost
is
something
that
maybe
we
could
consider
for
my
specific
circumstance,
I'm
asking
for,
like
a
rate
of
return
on
investment
breakdown,
for
why
something
like
this
would
be
so
expensive
and
necessary.
G
The
main
reason
I
can
say
is
when
you're
paying
by
the
hour
for
outside
attorneys.
It's
somewhere
between
for
the
associate
350
an
hour
they'll
build
like
every
six
minutes
for
the
partner.
It
will
be
something
like
700
or
800
dollars
an
hour,
so
you
of
course,
have
an
initial
retainer
for
5
000,
but
it
always
goes
way
up
from
there.
G
If
we
do
everything
outside
of
our,
you
know
contributor
space
when
it
comes
to
legal
questions
yeah,
so
it
just
kind
of
makes
me
feel
better
when
I'm
going
online
that
you
know
I
know
what
I'm
reading
is
like
accurate.
So
that's
why
I
was
kind
of
suggesting
it
and
seeing
what
people
would
think
about
it
and,
depending
on
feedback,
I
would
go
forward
with
some
sort
of
request,
either
through
some
line.
D
H
A
Yeah,
I
I
feel,
like
a
general,
I
think,
there's
kind
of
two
things.
I'm
thinking
right
here,
one
we
need
to
like
have
a
culture
where
people
think
if
they
like
need
something
that
will
enhance
their
job
like
that
geek
style
will
fund
and
pay
for
that
because,
like
we
can
see
the
value
add
in
that,
and
so
if
there
are
opportunities
like
that,
you
know
be
on
the
lookout
for
them
and
think
that
you
can
get
funding
and
then.
A
Secondly,
it's
probably
like
there's
probably
a
number-
it's
maybe
like
five
hundred
dollars
or
something
where
maybe
it's
a
hundred
dollars,
something
where,
like
you,
can
just
get
reimbursed
through
your
worker
proposal
right
versus
needing
to
do
a
separate
proposal.
For
that
I
don't
know
what
that
like
number
is.
I
know
we
did
the
tenderly
subscription,
which
is
like
a
monthly
thing
and
that
that's
actually
with
the
excel
itself.
I
think
it
was
500
and
we
actually
did
like
a
separate
proposal
for
that
so
yeah.
A
So
I
guess
for
there's,
probably
a
level
there
that
we're
we're
thinking
about.
I
guess
the
last
thing
I'd
ask
tammy
is
for
these.
It
would
be
good
like
to
always
look
at
corporate
discounts
or
something
like.
I
guess
you
would
probably
be
the
only
one
using
it
for
this,
but
if
there
are
things
that
would
like
give
access,
not
necessarily
the
bloomberg
law,
one,
maybe
other
ones
like
the
dune
one.
A
H
And,
and
also
something
else
to
consider,
you
know
any
possible
tax
implications.
We
don't
we
don't
want
to
burden
contributors
with
paying
tax
for
company
expenses.
So
when
we
think
of
giving
dave
money
for
proposals
or
tammy
for
these
tools
that
she
will
need
for
her
work,
you
know,
would
they
suffer
tax
implications.
G
Yeah,
that's
a
common
thing
with
european
contributors,
so
you're
like
referring
to
like
that,
for
example,
which
is
something
that
maybe
your
u.s
contributors
don't
have
to
experience
as
as
much
yeah.
So
that
is
a
consideration.
G
Unfortunately,
we
don't
have
too
many
ways
around
that
issue
currently,
just
because
you
know
we
can't
bill
anything
directly
to
the
dow,
unless
of
course
the
you
know,
payee
was
okay
with
receiving
some
sort
of
altcoin
right.
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
like
a
cost
incurred
upon
the
dow,
and
it's
always
like
I
actually
have
to
put
through
a
proposal
for
the
video,
the
launching
video
for
omen
and
yeah.
A
D
B
Think
nathan
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
think
like
as
another
example
of
what
you're
saying
if,
if
we
were
gonna,
do
like
if
there
was
a
ten
thousand
dollar
cost,
and
chris
says
oh
I'll,
just
throw
my
this
extra
10
I'll
pay,
this
10
000
and
then
I'll
just
add
this
ten
thousand
dollars
to
my
next
worker
proposal.
So
his
proposal
becomes
eight
thousand
dollars,
plus
ten
thousand
dollars
like
effectively
he's
getting
his
or
caney
fork
is
getting
paid.
Eighteen
thousand
dollars
from
dxdow
for
that
worker
proposal.
B
Right
instead
of
eight
thousand
dollars,
there's
gonna
be
tax
implications
for
chris
to
have
to
handle
related
to
like
just
throwing
extra
costs
on
top
of
your
worker
proposals
right.
Is
that
what
you
were
talking
about?
Nathan
kind
of
yeah
yeah,
exactly
yeah,
so
it's
not
just
vit
like
internal
things,
but
it's
yeah
yeah!
It's
like
it
could
become
a
much
bigger
thing
yeah!
A
Minimize,
like
you,
should
be
writing
off
costs
too
on
your
own,
like
it's,
not
tax,
advice
whatever,
but
like
a
lot
of
the
costs,
you
can
encourage
you're
having
for
a
company
like
you
can
write
these
write,
these
off
right.
G
Exactly
and
that's
even
for
right,
so
everyone's
a
contractor,
so
you're
gonna,
you
know
an
american
you're
filing
the
1099.
If
you
have
a
company,
it's
through
your
llc
and
you
should
I
I
unders.
I
don't
think
like
how
technical
you
want
to
get
with
it.
I
think
I
don't
know
if
anyone
has
multiple
accounts
on
their
centralized
exchange
where
they
move
their.
You
know
money
into
like
their
fiat.
You
know
bank
account,
but
I
don't
think
you
need
to
go
that
far
for
something
like
this.
G
G
A
A
I
We're
moving
from
taxis
to
the
export
man,
yeah,
okay,
what
I'm
going
to
show
you
is
what
we
have
deployed
on
develop
branch
in
the
export
on
github.
I
Anyone
can
use
it
and
I'm
going
to
show
you
two
proposals,
yes
like
from
patagonia
mobile
hotspot.
So
let's
hope
it
it's
going
to
be
connected.
I'm
going
to
show
you
two
proposals,
one
on
rinkeby
and
one
on
arbitron.
I
I
There
is
a
meter
time,
the
time
that
is
going
to
be
boosted
the
finish
time
that
is
going
to
appear
that
is
going
to
be
ending
on
the
on
the
body
machine.
So
talking
about
expenses.
This
is
a
transfer
of
0.66
to
buy
meat
for
dx
asado
here
in
patagonia,
and
this
proposal
is
in
drinkable
and
that's
it.
I
Everything
that
we
are
seeing
now
is
from
bring
away
network
you
can
you
can
navigate
all
all
around
the
app
see
the
times
of
the
schemes
that
we
are
using
the
permissions,
the
amount
of
proposals
that
have
the
active
ones,
the
boosted
ones,
and
the
navigation,
of
course,
is
to
be
fixed
a
bit
more,
the
the
excel
fonts
the
address,
so
this
doesn't
mean
it
doesn't
need
to
look
nice.
It
just
needs
to
work
and
display
as
much
information
as
possible.
Later
we
are
going
to
came
up
with
a
nice
design.
I
I
have
to
still
fix
a
lot
of
things
about
how
the
app
is
running.
You
can
also
fit
there
by
proportion,
names
things.
Okay,.
I
For
example,
rain
lowercase,
I
think
it
supported.
H
I
Yeah
yeah,
so
if
I,
if
I
type
I
will
store
it
here,
but
if
I,
if
I
type
I
don't
know
there,
it
does
so.
This
is
on
wrinkle.
You
can
come
here
and
create
a
proposal.
I
I
And
it's
going
to
search
for
the
proportions
in
wrinkle,
which
here
it
is
transfer
0.5,
rbs
to
augusto
the
pro
the
ipvs
description
wasn't
uploaded.
We
have
it
back
here
because
sometimes
the
proposition
is
applying
aft,
even
if
the
ipfs
description
didn't
happen,
but
anyway,
here
we
can
see
the
the
change
it
changed
to
state
4
that
is
pre-boosted
and
now
is
going
to
boost
in
two
hours.
If
two
hour
passed,
for
example,
some
someone
came
and
boost
and
is
still
able
to
be
boosted.
I
That
is
what's
going
to
happen,
it's
going
to
boost
automatically
and
it's
going
to
execute
the
vote.
So
the
variables
to
boost
now
happens
automatically
or
I
can
just
execute
and
well.
This
is
what
we
have
right
now.
This
is
an
arbitrary
which
is
very
good,
and
now
I'm
going
to
share
later
with
with
the
swapper
team
the
arbiter
address
there.
Is
this
one?
You
can
see
the
total
reputation
here.
That
is,
I
think,
the
same
as
a
shrinkable,
and
that's
all
that
we
have
right
now.
I
It's
working,
I'm
working
on
doing
some
changes,
trying
to
fix
issues
and
bugs
that
are
that
I'm
finding
all
around
the
app
but
yeah.
The
next
ball
is
going
to
add
or
the
encoding
of
of
functions
that
you
want
to
execute
on
the
quick
wallet
and
master
word
scheme.
So
imagine
that
you
go
there.
You
select,
you
select
any
rc20
token,
you
select
the
transfer
function
and
how
much
you
want
to
transfer
or
a
or
a
contract
that
you
want
to
interact
on
the
dow
level.
I
For
example,
swapper
you
select
the
swapper
fee
setter,
you
select,
set
fee
function
and
you
propose
a
new
protocol
fee
or
whatever,
so
anything
that
we
want
to
use
on
on
the
scheme.
Any
proposal,
any
action
that
we
want
to
execute
you're
going
to
have
like
selectors,
where
you're
going
to
be
able
to
select
through
curated
and
allow
accounts
and
actions
to
happen.
A
I
Through
awesome,
yes,
well
data,
we
need
to
check
with
the
with
the
swapper
team,
I
guess
with
fedo,
to
know
which
functions
that
he
needs
to
execute
on
which
contracts
and,
in
fact
that's
going
to
be
great
to
test
to
test
it
out,
because
we
are
going
to
have
to
allow
the
the
doubt
to
execute
this
smart
contract
function
and
then
we
are
going
to
execute
it.
So
it's
going
to
be
the
entire.
We
are
going
to
do
the
entire
process
of
allowing
a
new
action
to
be
taken
by
the
daw.
I
I
Want
arbitrary,
you
need
to
add
those
rpc,
those
rpc
well
url,
chinese
symbol
on
your
metamask
as
a
custom,
lpc
provider,
and
you
should
be
able
to
see
it
in
very
important.
It
uses
command
ether,
so
you
will
need
coven
ether
in
coven.
You
need
to
pass
it
to
your
to
the
arbitrating
test
net
on
the
bridge.
I
Money,
yes,
well,
the
thing
here
is
that
we
I'm
waiting
for
the
results
of
the
second
audit
of
the
second
audit
that
we
are
going
to
do
of
the
quality
scheme
and
permission
registry
and
what
and
once
that
is
done,
we
can
deploy
everything
we
can
deploy
audited
contracts
on
it
from
on
on
arbitrary,
exactly
though
those
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
holding
funds,
I
guess
exactly
is
going
to
hold
more
funds
in
arbitrary
but
yeah.
I
We
have
that
time
constraint
there
till
we
don't
have
the
the
audit
and
change
it
and
after
the
secondary,
we
are
going
to
have
a
formal,
like
dx
vote,
address
on
arabic
room
and
sa,
which
means
that
we
are
not
going
to
have
the
ownership
that
we
need
to
deploy,
swap
it
on
on
arabic
room.
I
think.
D
I
That
to
be
clear,
we
already
know
it.
We
fixed
we
fixed
stuff,
nothing,
nothing
too
serious.
We
find
we
find
a
few
bugs,
but
nothing
super
critical
and
yeah.
I
I
feel
super
confident
right
now
about
the
contract
that
we
that
we
are
going
to
use,
but
yeah.
We
need
that
final
assurance
from
an
auditor
and
therefore
we
we
will
be
ready
to
go.
A
A
Yeah
arbitrary
get
some
hype,
be
the
next
layer,
chooser
coming
sort
of
thinking
about
with
the
the
market.
You
know,
geeks
dow
has
kind
of
been
around
before
this
whole
cycle
happened
and
will
be
around
after
or
during
the
cycle
and,
like
I
just
think,
even
in
terms
of
things,
we're
doing
strategic
moves
like
think
about
like
arbitrary
layer.
Two,
like
those
are
things
that
are
not
relevant
to
what's
going
on
like
right
now
and
yeah.
I'm
excited
about
about
this.
A
D
B
So
so
there's
no
stopping
very
much
really
for
dmv
tokens
anymore.
So,
but
there
is
going
to
be
a
process
to
redeem
for,
from
directly
from
the
entity
for
like
x,
amount
of
funds,
so
they're
setting
up
a
fund,
and
you
basically
take
your
dmg
tokens
and
you
get
your
claim
on
the
funds.
I
think
so,
if
anything,
that's
the
only
thing
to
wait
for,
but
there's
no
information
on
it
and
they
can't
talk
about
it,
but
that's
what
they
say
they're
working
on.
B
C
B
C
A
A
D
B
A
D
I
D
E
That
would
be
the
third
initiative
for
buying
back
dxd
right.
A
D
A
I
I
D
I
Okay,
yeah,
what
I
mean
if
there
is
a
question
which
you're
saying
or
not,
let's
say
that,
let's
make,
let's
ask
it
out:
we
care,
we
get
the
proposal
and
we
decide
and
eventually
later
we
are
going
to
decide
what
we
are
going
to
do
with
the
with
those
either
if
they
counter
revenue.
Okay,
what
are
we
doing
with
them?
Are
we
sending
back
to
the
to
the
cure?
Are
we
using
them
to
survive.