►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-09-29]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
Discussion
for
september
29,
2021
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
which
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
for
to
go
through
starting
with
mainnet.
The
actual
only
live
proposal
now
on
mainnet
that
is
still
up
for
vote,
is
the
update
swapper.etheresolver
to
point
to
the
beta
6
release
of
swapper.
So
I
think
this
is
set
to
boost
in
four
and
a
half
hours,
and
this
is,
I
think,
like
the
third
release
of
swapper
in
like
as
many
weeks
or
three
or
four
weeks.
B
B
Yeah-
and
I
guess
this
one
is
yeah
any
anything
new,
including
this
or
just
some
like
fixes
to
the
previous
version.
D
So
I
think
one
thing
we
chose
to
do
is
do
smaller
releases
nowadays.
So,
even
though
it
sounds
like
a
big
new
release,
it's
mostly
fixes.
I
think,
a
lot
of
improvements
for
arbitrome,
adding
icons
to
tokens,
adding
new
tokens
to
the
standard.
Token
list,
such
as
usdt
adding
add,
add
swapper
token
to
metamask
button.
A
lot
of
people
were
actually
complaining,
not
seeing
swapper
in
metamask,
which
is
yeah.
So
so
we
added
like
a
lot
of
smaller
stuff.
It's
not
necessarily
fixes,
but
just
some
improvements.
D
We
added
also
echo
routing
for
arbitrary
one.
So
if
you
swap
one
on
swapper,
we'll
have
the
option
both
for
sushi
swap
and
for
swapper
fix
some
like
mobile
issues.
We
had
yeah
and
also
just
some
some
stuff
in
the
ui
that
that
we
weren't
100
clear
with
we
added
like
tool
tips
to
see
which
reward
you're
actually
getting,
because
sometimes
the
icons
are
too
small
or
the
icon
is
missing.
It's
really
hard
to
know
what
what
is
a
reward.
So
a
lot
of
like
improvements,
it's
actually
a
really
good
update.
B
Cool
yeah
and
I
think
it's
great,
the
kind
of,
as
you
said,
breaking
it
down
into
smaller
releases.
I
don't
know
if
people
have
been
following
along,
but
software
teams
have
really
been
cranking
out
a
lot
of
different
fixes
and
updates
and
kind
of
integrating
some
new
team
members
and-
and
you
know,
yeah,
it's
really
exciting-
to
see
the
iteration
pick
up
once
the
kind
of
product
is
live
and
we
can
work
with
it
really.
Looking
forward
to
the
bridges,
the.
B
As
it
comes
in
the
next
couple
weeks
or
whenever.
B
Awesome
and
then
there
are
a
couple
transfer
proposals
and
our
one
exit
transfer
proposal
and
then
a
e
to
stables
treasury
diversification
proposal
that
are
still
to
be
fully
executed,
but
we're
hoping
to
do
that.
Actually,
after
this
this
call
and
then
on
xda,
I
guess
the
first
thing
you
may
notice.
B
I
don't
think
he's
on
the
call,
but
this
week,
using
a
new
layout
that
ross
has
been
using
for
for
dx
vote
to
go
through
proposals
here,
but
for
xdi
there
is
xd
buyback,
45
the
funding,
multi
call
and
resubmission,
and
then
you
can
see
there's
actually.
I
think
three
other
buyback
proposals.
So
just
to
recap
here,
the
buyback
extension
pros
will
pass
on
saturday,
and
so
then
these
are
proposals
that
will
have
additional
buybacks
under
the
the
new
1
million
dollars
in
authorized
purchases.
B
B
So
that
means
that
when
the
oracle
is
checking
the
price
of
dxd,
it
checks
the
swapper
with
the
dxd
pool
for
the
price
and
it
and
it
checks
to
see
if
there's
a
certain
amount
in
there
to
be
able
to
get
the
price
from
there,
but
because
the
the
dxd
weather
pool
had
gone
down
a
lot,
the
actual
lap,
the
amount
of
wep
is
not
in
there.
So
the
proposal
failed
yesterday.
B
We
did
notice
this
over
the
weekend,
so
I
think
the
ones
starting
from
sunday.
That's
this
resubmission
one
here,
this
resubmission
one
here
and
then
the
46
and
47
have
the
appropriate
amount
of
minimum
wealth.
So
those
should
go
through.
B
There
yeah
and
then
besides
the
buy
back,
there
is
a
worker
proposal
for
sky
for
july
and
august
and
then
for
ali
q
for
august
and
september.
B
And
then
there
is
a
member
balancer
that
I
was
hoping
to
get.
Maybe
some
votes
on.
This
is
from
myself
kanye
fork,
so
I
had
done
a
couple
of
deposits
to
make
the
operations,
I
guess,
run
a
little
bit
more
smoothly.
So
one
of
these
was
a
zero
point.
We're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
get
that
dx
vote
in
it
in
a
little
bit.
But
the
answer
is
yes
keenan,
but
yeah.
So
for
this
member
balancer
there
were
a
couple
different
deposits.
B
I
made
to
kind
of
make
sure
that
the
operations
were
running
smoothly,
so
one
of
them
was
a
0.05
west
deposit.
I
think
because
there
was
a
funding
proposal
for
a
buyback
that
we
were
actually
just
short
of
west
in
the
dx
dow,
because
we
had
someone
had
taken
some
without
a
proposal
that
we
didn't
have
calculated.
B
So
I
sent
this
there
and
then
there
are
four
different
gen
deposits
that
were
sent
there,
and
this
is
a
reimbursement
actually
in
dollars
or
x,
die
sorry
instead
of
gen
and
that's
primarily
because
we
actually
don't
have
very
much
gen
in
xd
style
or
dx
dow.
So
we
need
to
have
the
dow
purchase
the
gen,
so
this
is
a
reimbursement
of
that,
and
so
this
is
the
first
proposal.
B
That
does
that,
as
you
can
see,
it's
844
for
these.
Oh
thank
you.
I
don't
know
who
this
is,
but
someone
just
voted
for
it.
So
these
are
there-
and
I
think
this
is
important
because
we
do
need
gen
over
the
next
at
least
couple
months,
but
we
are
running
low.
So
I
think
that
having
this
will
allow
other
people
with
gen
to
be
able
to
deposit
it
in
and
get
reimbursed
for
that
on
geek
style.
B
B
B
And
then
I
think
that's
it
for
yeah,
that's
it
for
xdi
bass,
but
now
we
have
arbitrarium
one
base
here,
and
so
there
are,
I
think,
12
proposals
that
were
passed
and
executed
yesterday,
so
those
have
kind
of
already
gone
through.
So
those
were
to
launch
the
epoch
ii
farming
campaigns.
B
I
think
for
the
original.
You
can
see
them
here
and
then
those
were
all
of
the
original
pairs
from
epoch,
one
with
a
couple
of
other
additions
here-
and
you
can
see
here.
There
were
lots
of
these
proposals
that
got
executed
yesterday
and
then
there
actually
is
one
live
proposal
here,
which
is
to
also
launch
a
farming
campaign
for
epoch,
2
on
the
rv
mim
pool.
B
But
this
one
is
different
than
the
other
ones,
because
we're
actually
hoping
to
use
it
to
have
it
pass
through
the
normal
boosted
phase
here
so
the
other
ones.
We
were
passing.
If
you
look
here,
they
were
actually
all
in
50
majority
and
that's
because
in
setting
up
this
new
base
on
geeksdale,
we
had
kind
of
made
it
like
a
multi-sig
dow,
so
that
we
could
pass
things
quickly
while
we're
testing
things
out-
and
this
proposal
here
is-
would
be
the
first
proposal
that
would
go
through
the
normal
boosting
process.
B
Now
it's
different
on
deep's
vote
or
on
arbitrary
one
than
it
is
from
other
chains,
and
so
there
are
lots
of
different
schemes
that
the
goosestone
team
have
been
work
kind
of
put
together
to
make
this
smoother.
So
this
is
actually
using
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
and
there
are
a
couple
different
params.
We
can
actually
check
the
parameters
here.
I
think.
B
So
you
can
see
here
it's
a
much
shorter
period
than
we
have
on
mainnet
or
even
next
time.
So
what
it
means
is,
if
you
stake
on
a
proposal,
it
only
needs
to
be
in
the
positive
state
for
12
hours
before
it
becomes
boosted
and
then
once
it
becomes
boosted,
it
only
needs
one
day
to
pass.
So
that's
really
like
an
18
hour.
I
mean
18
hour
a
day
and
a
half
turn
around
that
we
can
do.
B
B
So
now
we've
kind
of
inflated
those
these
on
some
specific
addresses
that
are
the
so-called
rep
whales,
but
moving
forward
when
we
want
to
use
the
swap
or
wallet
scheme
we'll
still
quickly,
we'll
still
need
to
get
to
10,
which
is
doable.
You
know
considering
the
different
amounts
that
you
know.
Probably
three,
two
three
four
contributors
may
be
able
to
do
that,
but
it
will
require
some
kind
of
coordination
there.
But
I
just
this
is
the
current
proposal.
That's
live.
We
actually
do
need
a
rep
to
vote.
B
B
B
E
Yeah,
just
sorry
for
background
noise,
I'm
in
a
coffee
shop
because
of
some
power
stuff
going
on
near
my
apartment,
but
yeah.
I
think
things
went
well
here.
I
think
we're
cutting
it
a
bit
close
and,
I
think,
hopefully,
for
epoch
3.
We
can
shoot
to
have
proposals
up
sort
of
like
the
week
before
the
other
thing.
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
be
aware
of
too
going
into
the
next
epoch
is,
as
we
shift
to
doing
things.
The
normal
way
with
boosted
proposals.
E
Is
that
if
there's,
you
know
15
some
odd
farming
campaigns
like
what
is
that
going
to
be
doing
to
the
required
upstate
for
some
of
those
proposals?
So
I
don't
know
if
we're
going
to
need
to
do
them
in
batches
or
whatever
or
adjust
that
those
parameters.
But
we
should
should
think
about
that
too,
because
we
haven't
actually
moved
that
many
proposals
through
yet
obviously,
but.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
good
point
that
I
haven't.
I
didn't
think
of
so
just
like.
Basically,
when
you
have
more
proposals
in
the
queue
or
in
the
abuse,
boosted
phase
that
increases
the
amount
that
you
need
to
stake
on
a
proposal
to
get
it
to
the
boosted
phase
and
then,
of
course,
on
arbitrary
one
and
deep's
vote
we're
using
dxd
for
staking
not
gen.
So
I'm
looking
like
here
the
boost
threshold
constant,
is
1.42.
B
E
Yeah,
I
think
the
multiplier
is
that
constant
raised
to
the
number
of
proposals.
So
if
it's
zero
proposals,
it's
just
one,
if
it's
one,
it's
it's
whatever
that
is.
If
it
then
it
goes
up
so
yeah,
it
goes
up
exponentially
and
that
is
actually
pretty
high.
So
let
me
do
some
quick
math
here
I'll
come
back
in
a
sec.
A
Chris
you've
been
using
the
netlifly
url
up
there,
so.
B
What's
that,
so
the
only
reason
I'm
using
that
is
to
showcase
this
layout
that
that
ross
has
been
working
on.
I.
B
F
Yeah,
exactly
what
you're?
Sorry
guys!
Can
you
hear
me
yeah?
Okay,
I
hear
myself.
I
don't
know
what
yeah
the
version
that
you're
seeing
on
the
xbox.dev
is
what
we
have
in
the
developer.
F
What
we
will
have
to
do
is
to
update
the
cache
for
arbitrary,
because,
right
now
what
you
are
getting,
what
you
are
do,
what
you
have
on
your
local
host,
plus
the
last
time
that
you
open
so
the
longer
you
wait
before
opening
again
the
app
the
more
time
it's
going
to
take
to
know.
B
And
there's
actually
a
nice
explanation
of
this
in
the
geeks
governance
github,
both
the
three
different
releases.
They
have
and
then
also
the
the
cash
details
in
the.
F
Pros
and
cons
something
that
we
should
do
is.
I
should
travel
the
expo
that
that
eth
link
to
the
signature
we
can
update
the
next
release
from
them
with
the
signature.
B
B
So
yeah,
just
on
the
some,
maybe
john
or
someone
we'll
need
a
whale
to
vote
on
this
in
the
next
five
hours
to
make
sure
this
one
goes
through
and
then
hopefully,
if
that
goes
through
then
boosted
proposals
like
will
work
through
swapper
scheme
and
then
that
will
we
can
kind
of
use
that
going
forward.
E
D
E
B
D
B
B
And
just
for
programming
we
are
tuesdays
at
1400.
Utc
is
a
farming
sink
call.
Keenan
has
been
putting
together
all
of
the
kind
of
different
distributions
allocations.
Now
we
have
the
second
one
we
had
so
that
call
on
tuesday
is
meant
to
just
kind
of
have
a
community
discussion
on
where
we're
at
with
rewards
reflect
on
the
previous
epoch
and
then
make
adjustments
going
forward,
and
then
I
think
that
the
goal
is,
as
john
was
saying
about
getting
these
proposals
in.
B
I
think
the
goal
is
to
have
proposals
submitted
the
friday
before
the
next
epoch
starts,
so
we're
starting.
The
epoch
said
thursday
1500
utc,
and
so
that
would
mean
the
friday
before
that
we
try
to
submit
proposals,
especially
if
they're
going
to
start
we're
going
to
start
clogging
the
queue
there
and
then
that
tuesday
call
will
help
determine
what
the
rewards
will
be
for
for
those
proposals.
B
And
then
there
were
not
any
live
proposals,
but
I
think
there
is
a
there
may
be
some
proposals
for
both
the
rb
west
duel
rewards
pool
and
then
the
badger
pool
that
is,
you
know,
I
guess
not
exactly
part
of
this
epoch
and
part
of
that,
but
are
related.
So
I
wasn't
sure
if
sky
and
keenan
had
any
thing
to
say
about
those.
A
A
I
think
we're
gonna
have
a
lot
of
scenarios
where
we
can
get
like
the
set
pairs
that
we
know
are
farming
going,
and
we
should
have
flexibility
to
kick-start
campaigns
quickly
or
slowly
around
other
strategic
pairs,
and
that
that
is
the
scenario
was
with
badger,
and
that
also
happened
with
another
project
where
they,
you
know,
we
were
kind
of
making
them
wait
for
an
epoch.
When
we,
if
we
kicked
it
off
right
away,
we
might
have
had
a
better
opportunity
to
do
something
with
them.
A
So
I
think
we
should
have
some
flexibility
around
strategic
farms
and
pairs
where
they
don't
necessarily
fit
into
the
average
the
average
schedule
of
the
epochs.
A
But
it's
not
really
decided
yet
or
we're
still
learning
this,
and
but
I
I
know
for
a
fact
that
we're
going
to
have
a
scenario
with
badger
where
we
we
we'll
have
to
do
it
probably
outside
of
the
epoch
schedule.
B
Well,
maybe
we'll
come
back,
but
there's
another.
I
think
we're
testing
the
dual
rewards,
because
we've
done
this
before
next
time.
We
have
to
dice
on
arbitrary
it's
another
example
of
like
how
it's
a
project
that
we're
trying
to
get
something
like
a
unique
kind
of
distribution
that
requires
some
tailoring.
B
Because
to
sum
up
the
sky
and
the
rv
eve
is
it's
nice
when,
like
swapper,
has
this
base
level
like
farming
campaign
that
we're
making
adjustments
to
every
two
weeks
right,
but
it's
kind
of
on
the
most
popular
pairs,
it's
kind
of
providing
a
base
layer
of
liquidity,
and
then,
on
top
of
that,
we
have
these
more
like
specialized
tailored
engagements
to
grow
the
grow.
The
community
that
are
you
know,
maybe
different
every
other
week
or
every
epoch.
There's
kind
of
something
new
to
talk
about
the
other,
potentially
exciting
thing.
B
Awesome,
so
that
was
it
for
proposals
and
then
just
for
discussion
items
hats
in
the
security
committee
john.
I
think
you
had
a
conversation
recently
and
wanted
to
check
in
here
yeah.
E
Again,
sorry
for
the
background
noise,
but
just
to
review
hats
is
a
new
project
that
the
style
has
provided
a
grant
with
and
wants
to
partner
with
and
actually
use
in
production.
They
are
now
live
on
mainnet
and
what
they
are
is
like.
A
bug,
bounty,
incentivization
network
they're
trying
to
get
you
know,
hackers
and
auditors
to
report
on
bugs
directly
to
the
project
in
exchange
for
some
phony,
that's
placed
in
the
native
token
or
whatever
token.
E
So,
the
idea
is
to
use
dxd
to
provide
a
what's
called
a
vault
on
hats,
and
this
will
serve
as
like
the
reward
pool
for
incentivizing
bug,
bounty
reports.
And
then
you
have
to
have
a
committee
which
receives
these
messages
and
it's
encrypted,
but
you're
trusting
that
committee
to
act
upon
these
reports
and
and
like
how
the
best
way
they
possibly
can
obviously
with
consensus
and
stuff
there's
limitations
to
what
even
a
trusted
committee
can
do.
There's
immutable
code
etc,
but
they
would
sort
of
be
entrusted
to
take
the
best
course
of
action.
E
Given
this
information
and
also
approve
whatever
the
amount
should
be
for
the
bounty
reward
based
on
the
type
of
report
and
type
of
and
what
severity
it
comes
at,
and
so
I
think
so
now
we
have
the
telegram
group
set
up
and
working
with
rinkby,
but
we
have
a
couple
of
open
items
here.
We
need
to
determine
who
that
community
is
exactly.
E
You
know
it's
not
exactly
spending
it,
but
it's
providing
it
as
a
pool
that
could
be
rewarded
in
the
event
of
bug
reports
and
the
other
important
thing
is
that
hats
should
be
starting
what
they're
calling
security
mining
shortly.
I
think
in
a
couple
weeks-
and
that
is
a
way
for
anybody
holding
the
token
in
these
vaults
to
actually
stake
that
token
and
burn
hats
as
a
reward
as
well
so
dx,
dao,
providing
dxd
would
be
earning
hats
and
also
other
dxd
holders
in
the
community
could
be
earning
hats
by
staking
alongside
vxtau.
E
In
this
vault
so
you're
putting
your
gxd
at
risk
to
be
rewarded
in
this
case,
but
you're
earning
hats
in
return
and
yeah.
So
those
are
the
two
big
questions,
who's
the
committee
and
how
much
I
think,
kind
of
the
most
obvious
thing
would
be
to
just
use
the
existing
quote.
Multisig
there
has
been
some
talk
about
creating
a
new
multisig
that
actually
has
more
devs
on
it.
The
dev
multisig
is
it's
called.
It
actually
has
a
bunch
of
different
people
that
aren't
on
them.
Yeah.
G
Maybe
I'll
add
just
that,
you
know
the
responsibility
of
the
committee
is
to
you,
know,
receive
sort
of
like
disclosures
and
and
decide
like
if
to
approve
them
and
how
to
approve
them,
and
this
needs
to
be
like
done
fairly
quickly.
So
these
needs
to
be
like
technically
like
competent
people,
and
you
know,
people
who
have
high
availability,
which
I
don't
think
is
a
problem,
but
just
to
note
that.
B
G
G
B
Yeah,
I
feel,
like
benchmarking,
I
guess
open
to
what
other
people
are
thinking,
but
I
think
that
the
two
things
on
my
phone
are
one
and
benchmarking.
What
that
dhd
number
is
to
something
else
and
obliquities
around
that.
I
don't
know
you
know.
Dxd
geek
style
is
a
bit
smaller
project
and
has
less
funds
in
its
one.
So
maybe
not
as
much
on
that,
but
and
then
the
second
thing
is
in
terms
of
the
committee.
B
I
think
the
important
thing
is
that
they
are
rep
holders
and
that
they
could
be
slashed
in
some
way
and
then
figuring
out.
How
like,
who
is
doing
that
and
and
like
the
responsibilities.
I
think
you
know
it
is
important
that
we
recognize
that
these
are
responsibilities
that
people
they
take
time
and
people
should
be
paid
for
and
it's
part
of
part
of
their
it
should
be
part
of
their
worker
proposal.
B
But
I
think,
like
the
important
thing
is
that
there's
some
recourse
that
there's
some
recourse
for
rep
holders
in
the
case
that
kind
of
empowering
this
committee
and
that
there's
kind
of
clear
communication
on
like,
I
guess
the
members
they
don't
have
to.
I
mean
it
could
be
rep
holders
and
a
single
rep
address
themselves.
I
just
think
tying
it
to
a
rep
address
is
the
key.
E
We
also
have
to
specify
which
contracts
are
covered
and
what
the
different
severity
levels
and
the
percentage
of
the
reward
pool
that
is
given
out
based
on
that
severity,
I
think
right
now,
the
suggested
contracts
are
basically
all
the
swapper
contracts
and
the
omen
contracts
and
then
yeah
we
can
go
into
probably
the
severity
stuff
is
a
little
more
technical,
so
I
don't
know
if
it
makes
sense
to
discuss
it
here,
but
maybe
we'll
have
a
downtown
course
or
something
once
that's
been
detailed.
E
Another
thing
that's
sort
of
an
aside,
but
I
think
is
pretty
interesting.
Uma
I
I've
heard,
is
also
using
hats
and
they're
looking
at
doing
kpi
options
as
part
of
the
actual
reward
token,
and
this
could
be
a
great
use
case
for
carrot
as
well.
So
what
you
could
imagine
I
think
here
is
like
if
the
committee
decides
that
they
give
out
basically,
instead
of
txt,
it's
like
carrots
that
are
then
in
turn
representing
dxd
and.
H
E
The
carrots,
but
it's
conditional
on
you,
know
the
committee
acting
in
good
faith
right.
So
if
somebody
weren't
like
trying
to
steal
from
the
vault
or
something
if
the
committee
were
to
go,
rogue
or
or
maybe
even
if
the
vault
itself
were
hacked,
which
is
probably
less
likely.
But
if
that
were
possible,
then
the
carrots
might
not
actually.
D
E
Yeah,
I
think,
like
the
high
level,
it's
it's
programmable
incentives
right
and
this
whole
like
so
much
of
blockchain,
really
goes
back
to
incentives,
so
I
think
you'll
find
use
cases
in
a
lot
of
places
and
like
yeah.
I
think
this
is
a
great
example.
You
could
imagine
hats
being
used
widely
by
you
know
hundreds
of
projects,
and
potentially
all
of
them,
would
have
a
need
for
something
like
this.
B
Yeah,
I
feel
like
500
seems
that's
two
that
would
be
250
000
at
500
of
dxd,
and
I
guess,
if
that's
what
liquidity
put
in
that
would
feel
like.
We
probably
shouldn't
do
more
than
more
than
that,
but
it
could
obviously
increase
and
obviously
we
have
like
investment
in
hats.
It'd
be
great
to
get
more
hats.
Tokens.
E
Yeah-
and
the
other
thing
too,
is
with
the
security
mining,
whatever
they're
calling
nylon
can
correct
me
because
I'm
probably
getting
it
around,
but
the
community
will
come
in
with
some
amount
of
dxd
as
well
right,
so
right,
the
final
reward
pool
actually
be
bigger
than
whatever
tx
style
puts
in
you
know.
E
B
E
Yeah
they're
mining
hats
and
also
providing
like
security
to
the
external,
obviously
they're,
putting
their
funds
at
risk.
So
without
some
extra
incentive
it
probably
wouldn't
make
sense,
but
with
the
hats
incentive
you
know,
this
could
probably
be
kicked
off
even
without
any
dxd
from
dx.
Now
itself
like
you,
could
just
set
up
the
vault
open
it
into
the
community
and
enroll
with
that.
But
but
I
do
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
some
from
the
treasury.
B
Well,
and
just
the
carrot
thing
too
is
like
I
guess
we
could
incentivize
the
dxd
holders
that
contribute
to
that
in
some
way.
I'm
not
sure
how,
but
if
we
wanted
to
get
people
to
deposit
on
behalf
of
dhd,
we
could
like
distribute
the
carrot.
G
Or
you
could
reward
it
rep,
it
could
be
interesting.
I
just
want
to
say
that
you
know
sort
of
like
the
beauty
of
a
bug.
Bounty
is
that
you
know
it
like
whatever
we're,
paying
is
definitely
gonna
be
less
than
you
know.
The
potential
hack
that
you
know
would
include
a
problem
like
a
more
devastating
outcome,
so
if
that
makes
sense.
E
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
maybe
just
use
the
established
one
to
start
and
then
try
to
transition
to
a
more
focused
one
later
that
that
might
be
the
easiest
thing
if
we
want
to
get
rolling.
The
other
question,
too,
I
think,
is
obviously
with
the
funding.
There
would
be
a
funding
proposal
involved,
but
do
we
want
to
have?
Does
it
make
sense
to
have
a
separate
signal
proposal
kind
of
specifying
who
the
committee
is
and
any
other
details
like
you
were
talking
about?
E
Okay,
so
so
there's
not
really
big
urgency
here,
but
I
do
think
the
security
mining
is
starting
in
maybe
a
couple
weeks,
so
it
would
be
a
nice
thing
for
the
dxd
community.
I
think
to
have
that
vault
ready
in
a
couple
weeks
so
that
they
can
participate
with
the
launch
of
this
system.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
the
easiest
would
be
just
whatever
would
need
to
be
in
the
signal
proposal.
Just
have
that
in
the
funding
proposal
that
would
like
kind
of
culminate
in
in
that,
when
you
kind
of
lay
out
there
and
you'd
get
kind
of
authorization
from
that
in
the
same
one,
especially
if
it's
even
going
to
that
the
the
multisig
that
is
empowered
with
that.
B
That
would
make
it
easier,
and
I
would
guess
that
that
would
probably
be
like
based
off
of
a
dow
talk
post,
that
we
had
that
was
kind
of
explaining
some
of
this.
I
would
hope
that
maybe
that
is
the
formation
of
like
a
more
security
oriented
squad.
I
know
there's
like
some
other
things.
We
should
be
thinking
about
with
this
and
there's
some
kind
of
details
and
the
kind
of
structure
to
work
out.
So
I
think
like
having
something
talking
to
the
proposal.
E
Yeah
not
that
we
could
do
this
in
short
order,
but
you
could
imagine
people
like
this
having
to
stake
some
of
their
own
capital
or
reputation
but
getting
rewarded
for
it
as
well
right.
So
if,
if
they
are
acting
in
bad
faith,
they
actually
lose,
but
but
they're
also
gaming
by
you
know
getting
extra
incentives
there,
but
not
that
I'm
suggesting
that
now,
because
we
have
way
too
much
on
our
plates.
But
you
know
you
could
start
to
imagine
stuff
like
that,
making
sense
in
the
future
as
well
and.
B
Awesome
and
then
just
contributor
ux
check
in
melanie.
I
wasn't
sure
if
there's
anything
we
wanted
to
update
and
we
got
some
recruiting.
H
Yeah
nothing
too
much,
but
I
just
I
wanted
to
quickly
discuss
my
signal
proposal
that
I
posted
earlier
today
in
the
forum
for
a
contributor,
stipend
and
additional
funding,
while
we're
in
lisbon
for
the
dx
retreat
and
lisbon
blockchain
week.
Basically,
the
forum
post
outlines
a
request
for
contributor
stipend.
A
lot
of
you
are
flying
from
all
over
the
world,
so
it's
just
important
that
you
guys
are
all
reimbursed
for
travel,
whether
it's
plane,
tickets
or
train
tickets.
H
So
in
addition
to
that
travel,
stipend,
a
request
for
fifty
dollars
a
day
for
contributors
will
be
provided
up
to
eight
hundred
dollars
in
total.
H
So
I
know
some
of
you
will
not
be
in
lisbon
for
the
entire
two
weeks,
so
it'd
be
fine
to
just
prorate
the
funds
where
it's
applicable,
we'll
also
be
covering
the
cost
of
the
liz
conn
ticket.
And
if
you
have
any
questions
about
that,
you
can
just
ask
me
or
dave,
and
we
can
kind
of
help
you
navigate,
but
it
should
be
pretty
straightforward.
H
It's
also
important
to
note
that
the
amount
for
our
stipend
is
not
as
much
as
it
was
in
paris,
mainly
because
we're
providing
accommodations
and
then
covering
a
number
of
meals
for
our
contributors,
which
kind
of
brings
me
into
the
next
portion
of
the
proposal
in
which
we
are
asking
for
additional
funding
of
15
000
u.s
dollars,
and
that
would
cover
a
variety
of
things
during
that
two
weeks.
It
would
cover
our
prediction
market
event
at
the
block.
H
It
would
cover
any
like
catering
and
supplies
for
the
greater
than
workshop,
any
joint
lunches
or
dinners
and
local
taxes
for
the
accommodations
that
we
didn't
account
for
before,
but
these
funds
will
be
held
in
the
dxdl
multisig
and
distributed
on
a
as
need
basis
like
any
of
the
funds
left
over
will
just
be
returned
to
the
dxtile
mainnet
treasury.
H
G
H
Yeah,
that
is
true,
but
we're
probably
gonna
cater
lunch
there
for
both
days
and
then
have
food
and
snacks,
since
the
greater
than
workshop
actually
will
be
an
eight
hour
long
event
workshop
each
day
on
sunday
and
monday,
so
we'll
be
providing
like
food
and
anything
else.
Additional
the
initial
costs
were
just
covered
for
greater
than.
B
And
I
was
just
looking
at
the
previous
proposal
or
the
forum
thread,
so
I
guess
that
was
there
was
a
25
000
initial
funding.
That
was
like.
Basically,
all
the
lodging,
I
think
is
that
correct,
exactly
yeah,
and
so
then
I'm
just
trying
to
do
the
math.
I
guess
just
trying
to
do
the
math
on
this.
This
is
the
25k
and
then
the
15k
that
we
requested
here
and
then
this
stipend.
B
I
guess
that
would
be,
like
maybe
let's
say,
a
thousand
a
person,
so
that's
another
15,
000
65k
and
then
plus,
maybe
the
greater
than
so
we're
looking
at
like
a
70
75k
cost
so
far
or
like
as
an
estimate
maybe
and
the
dallas
sponsorship
yeah.
Oh
the
dallas,
yeah
yeah.
B
H
H
Yeah
exactly
and
we
don't
really
anticipate
in
spending
the
entire
15
000
we're
just
saying
like
if
costs
do
come
up,
like
I
said
their
local
taxes,
just
if
there's
any
like
meals
or
dinners
and
then
even
swag,
so
that'll
just
kind
of
cover.
B
Yeah,
exactly
any
yeah
any
thoughts,
questions
about
this
request
and
kind
of
maybe
lisman
logistics.
C
I
And
it's
20
people,
paris.
Of
course
we
were
much
smaller
amount
of
people
so
of
course
exciting,
but
of
course
having
more
people
also
scales
linearly
the
costs
right,
but
I
guess
one
you
know,
given
that
this
is
our
kind
of
first
dx
retreat.
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
afterwards
once
everything
is
settled
down,
there
is
back
everyone's
back
home
is
a
kind
of
go
over
this
financially
as
well.
I
Given
that
I
believe
we
plan
to
host
a
dx
retreat
every
year,
more
or
less,
and
maybe
in
retrospect
also
do
an
analysis
of
what
went
well,
what
went
bad,
where
we
could
spend
more
money,
perhaps
so,
where
we
could
spend
less
money
et
cetera.
You
know,
I
think,
we'll
have
a
much
better
idea
about
that
in
the
aftermath.
Yeah.
H
Yeah,
absolutely
I
mean
I
think,
we're
definitely
going
to
be
spending
quite
a
bit
of
time
together
at
the
retreat.
So
we
have
like
presentations
and
discussions
kind
of
planned
around
certain
things.
So
I
think
that
should
definitely
be
a
goal
of
ours
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
at
the
greater
than
worker
workshop.
B
Awesome-
and
I
don't
think
augusto
or
I
think
both
the
gusto
and
ross
are
in
route
to
lisbon's
no
go
dev
update,
but
they're
cranking
lots
of
things
and
kind
of
it's
great
to
see
that
this
isn't
that
dick's
vote
kind
of
constantly
get
updated
and
fixed.
So
if
you
have
any
be
willing
to
try
and
use
it,
which
actually
brings
you
to
the
next
point,
these
two
killer
posts
from
sky
on
how
to
get
paid
using
dx
vote,
which
is
exciting
in
a
sense
of
getting
kind
of
freeing
ourselves
from
alchemy.
B
So
I
have
submitted
a
proposal
on
deke's
vote
and
got
paid
with
rep
and
uscc
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
know
skye
just
did
that
and
then
you
can
see
here,
there's
two
pretty
clear
instructions
on
how
you
can
use
this
yourselves
and
it's
pretty
self-explanatory.
B
I
guess
the
big
change-
or
you
have
to
notice-
is
kind
of
this
thing
right
here.
There
are
some
tricky
things
for
each
of
these,
and
so
this
is
your
wallet
address
that
you
want.
This
is
the
actual
amount
of
rep
just
in
the
pure
number.
This
would
be
the
xdy
value.
B
If
you
wanted
to
request
xdi
and
then
if
you
want
another
token,
this
is
where
you
put
the
token
address
and
then
the
uf
the
token
amount
here
is
in
way,
as
opposed
to
these
two
inputs,
which
are
not,
and
so
this
means
you
need
to
look
up
the
number
of
decimals
and
for
usdc
that's
six
for
x
for
west.
That's
that's
18,
if
you're
ever
sending
that
from
there.
But
I
think
this
is
like
an
important
step
to
you
know
us
shifting
governance
onto
dx
vote.
B
Scott
was
talking
about
this.
Yesterday
we
talked
about
how
it's
good,
that
we
have
both
alchemy
and
dx
vote
running
side
by
side
now,
so
we
can
kind
of
compare
different
things,
but
it's
really
great
to
be
using
this
to
do
things,
because
every
time
we
run
into
a
little
bug
or
problem,
it
is
something
that
dx
gov
dev
team
can
work
on
and
fix
and
improve
dx
vote.
E
B
And
ross
is
specifically
working
on
like
one
of
the
first
things
he's
working
on
is
a
the
proposal
template
to
make
it
easier
on
that
so
kind
of
it
should
be
easier
for
anyone
to
do
that.
There.
B
Okay
and
then
just
like
the
last
thing,
just
as
we're
just
to
highlight
a
couple
interesting
discussions,
I
haven't
got
a
chance
to
respond
to
the
forum,
the
deposit
lusd
in
from
the
style
tragedy
to
be
protocol.
I
think
the
protocol
is
a
really
interesting
project.
B
I
know
they
had
some
conversations
this
morning
with
that
and
then
I
think
there
was
also
an
interesting
post
from
conor
hughes
or
talking
about
the
buy
back
stuff
and
maybe
hints
at
what
our
kind
of
long-term
plans
are
for,
how
we
implement
a
more
automated
structured
buyback
and
what
the
conditions
are
for
that,
and
you
know
also
something
we
can
talk
about
in
lisbon.
I
think
too,.