►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-10-06]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
dx
dow
governance
discussion
for
wednesday
october
6,
1500
utc
congrats
to
the
red
sox
for
the
win
over
the
yankees
last
night,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
mainnet,
coming
in
hot
this
week
with
a
bunch
of
proposals
going
on
here,
I'm
actually
going
to
share
my
screen
to
the.
A
B
Vote
to
go
over
these
yeah,
so
a
couple
different
ones.
The
first
one
we
talked
about
last
week
is
the
contributor,
stipend
and
funds.
So
this
is
for
contributors
to
be
able
to
claim
expenses
from
the
trips
to
lisbon.
B
I
think
this
was
put
forth
through
by
melanie,
and
this
is,
I
think,
or
slated
to
pass
in
the
next
day
or
two
so
for
those
traveling
to
lisbon,
can
reference
this
proposal
and
request
up
to
those
amounts
in
their
next
contributor
proposal,
and
then
there
is
a
deep
style
treasury
diversification
number
26
each
to
stables.
So
there
were
a
bunch
done
last
week
and
I
think
this
is
another
one
in
this.
B
I
think
this
is
going
to
rye
and
usdc,
and
I
think
this
might
there
might
be
a
couple-
I'm
not
sure,
actually
how
many
more
of
this
but
yeah
that
was
set
to
pass
in
four
days.
B
And
then
there
is
governance.
Gas
refund
number
six.
So
this
is
actually
a
funding
proposal
that
sends
eth
to
a
smart
contract
where
deak
style
governance
participants
can
claim
refunds
or
reimbursement
for
gas
costs
over
the
last
quarter.
So
you
can
see
how
much
each
of
the
actions
there
are
reimbursed
in
certain
amounts.
Fun
fact
in
this
quarter.
B
Dave
was
the
number
one
eth
burner
this
week,
just
just
edging
me
out
for
for
the
amount
of
eath
burn,
I
think
he
gets
a
1.4
eth
refund
for
all
of
the
gas
costs.
He's
occurred
over
the
last
quarter,
but
that's
yeah
five
days
there
and
there's
steps
for
how
to
do
it.
I
believe
in
the
this
post
here
for
anyone
to
claim
the
funds
for
mainnet
gas
costs.
C
B
C
Yeah
or
more
is
that,
does
that
make
sense.
B
B
Because
even
like
just
getting
getting
that
completely
free
is
probably
not
enough
to
actually
have
active
participants,
but
anyway,
a
conversation.
I.
D
Thought
on
that
too,
is
you
know,
I
think
when
we
came
up
with
those
percentages,
eth
was
a
lot
smaller
value.
So
I
think
the
important
thing
is
that
the
voters
are
paying
some
amount
of
money
to
prevent
like
spamming,
but
it
maybe
doesn't
have
to
be
10
if
heath
is
so
high
that
it's
like
amounting
to
hundreds
of
dollars-
and
I
don't
know
you
know-
maybe
it's.
B
B
Other
big
discussion
we
should
start
having-
and
I
think
I
was
just
thinking
about
this
as
a
gusto
was
talking
about-
is
what
about
arbitrary,
because
there,
I
think
you
know
gas
costs
are
going
to
be
real
and
significant,
but
not
a
whole
lot,
but
I
think
we
should
probably
be
reimbursing
that
plus.
B
I
know
there's
already
been
a
lot
of
costs
that
have
been
incurred
by
the
the
rep
whales
in
terms
of
that
have
been
submitting
the
proposals,
and
so
I
think
we
probably
need
to
come
up
with
something
on
on
that
too.
G
C
And
dave
you
mentioned,
there's
some
new
refund
system
coming
because
I
had
shared
a
tool
that
other
dows
are
using
for
like
automatic,
easy
refunds
that
just
like
show
the
transaction
they're
like
you
can
just
claim
your
money
back
and
you
said:
there's
some
systems
coming
that
we
won't
need
to
do
that.
H
H
In
fact,
we
can
use
it
right
now
in
everything
we
need
to
configure
it,
but
what
we
need
to
do
is
to
set
the
maximum
gas
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
as
refund
the
maximum
gas
price
and
the
gas
limit,
and
that
is
what
you
are
going
to
be
getting
if
the
gas
prices
get
too
high
and
if
you
pay
more
than
that
more
than
the
gas
price
that
we
are
refunding,
you
are
going
to
be
paying
that
from
from
your
own
pocket,
but
if
not,
they
are
going
to
be
like.
C
H
Yeah,
the
idea
is
not
to
let
it
be
attacked.
Maybe
later
we
can
do
some
gas
refunds
if
we
want
to.
But
if
you
let
the,
if
you
let
the
voters
set
the
gas
price
that
they
are
going
to
be
using
for
the
refund
that
can
be
attacked,
because
I
can
say:
okay,
I'm
going
to
vote
with.
I
know
this
amount
of
gas,
and
this
is
the
gas
price
and
I'm
going
to
receive.
B
H
B
Cool
cool,
yes
sky.
I
don't
know
if
there's
like
what
people
think
about
thoughts
on
arbitrary
transactions,
but
it
seems
to
be
like
simple
transfers
are
like
two
to
eight
dollars
or
something
like
that.
But
I
don't
know
if
it's
been
that
consistent,
because
it
depends
on
like
how
much
usage
of
the
network.
B
It
goes
down
because
and
this
or
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
this
works
but
like
because
the
cost
is
putting
is
entering
transactions
on
mainnet,
so
many
transactions
on
mainnet,
but
the
like
cost
to
arbitrary
users
is
spread
across
the
number
of
arbitrary
users,
so
that
cost
on
ethereum
mainnet
will
like
stay
the
same,
but
to
each
user
on
arbitrary
one.
It
would
go
down
because
it
spread
over
more
users,
more
transactions
paid.
D
So
this
is
sort
of
in
my
head,
not
verified,
with
looking
how
it
works,
but
I
think
there's
like
essentially
two
components:
there's
still
a
fee
market
on
arbitrary
and
therefore
demand
on
arbor
from
will
move
the
price
of
gas
on
arbitram
but
like
what
chris
was
just
saying
is
like
the
compo.
The
other
component
is
paying
your
way
to
l1
that
is
shared
by
everybody,
so
like
yeah,
that
can
actually
the
cost
of
that
could
actually
go
down
when
the
bandwidth
is
like
maxed
out,
basically
yeah.
D
As
aside,
I
was
kind
of
hit
me
that
you
know
if
there
were
to
be
an
arbitrary
token.
It
would
make
sense
to
use
that
for
the
fee
market
on
arbor
drum
and
still
pay
the
l1
costs
and
these
so
that
you're
essentially
using
both.
I
don't
know
how
no
one
has
holy
user
experience,
but
it
was
just
a
thought
I
had.
I
don't
know.
Maybe
I'm
just
fishing
paragraphs
or
something,
but
it's
interesting
to
think
about,
may
cycle.
B
Okay,
just
moving
along
here,
there
are
two
different
proposals
to
send:
518
000
swapper
from
the
dx
dow
mainnet
treasury.
So
the
first
one
you
can
see
here
is
being
sent
to
the
swapper
staking
rewards
relayer.
So
this
is
a
relayer
contract
that
will
be
used
to
launch
the
swapper
farming
campaigns
on
mainnet
and
then
the
second
proposal
is
a
proposal
to
send
518
000
to
the
dev
multisig
to
be
transferred
over
to
xdi
base
and
then
to
be
used
there
to
launch
swapper
farms
there.
B
So
these
will
hopefully
pass
in
six
days.
There's
we'll
be
able
to
get
started
with
the
xdia
ones
there.
There
are
three
corresponding
swapper
swapper
farming
campaigns
for
the
multi-call
proposal.
So
you
can
see
here
on
mainnet
we
went
with
the
the
four
combining
four
epochs
to
save
gas
cost,
just
to
mention
a
separate
gas
cost.
It
was
a
yesterday
was
quite
the
day
to
need
to
create
a
pair
on
swapper
mainnet.
I
think
it
was
at
one
point.
B
I
was
like
quoted
like
three
thousand
three
thousand
dollars
to
do
it,
but
I
think
I
got
it
for
just
under
a
thousand
dollars
there,
but
yeah
there's
three
different
campaigns
here.
It's
actually
a
little
bit
easier
to
see
these
on
alchemy
in
terms
of
what
they're,
what
they're
doing
here
but
yeah.
So
hopefully
these
will
go
through
just
one
note
on
these
because
we
need
it.
B
The
time
is
sensitive
because
these
need
to
go
through
and
be
executed
before
next
thursday
1500
utc,
because
that's
when
the
actual
timestamp
is
they
will
need
to
make
sure
and
get
boosted
tonight
or
move
to
the
boosted
phase
tonight
yeah
and
then
I
think
that
was
it
for
mainnet.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
questions
about
the
swapper
farming
campaign
proposals,
we
are.
B
On
the
xi
ones,
I
think
the
the
hold
up
on
doing
those
and
getting
started
on
those
is
because
you
don't
have
this
swapper
token
address
on
xdi,
but
I
think
we
might
be
able
to
get
that
and
then
once
that's
set,
we
can
start
on
the
the
xdi
proposals
there.
B
Cool,
so
you
can
see
at
the
top
here
there's
a
couple
of
those
different
buyback
orders
that
are
actually
still
pending
execution,
so
mostly
just
waiting
for
that
trying
to
get
the
the
solvers
up
and
running
for
xdi
to
see
if
we
can
execute
them
so
just
to
give
everyone
a
kind
of
an
update
on
this.
We've
been
trying
to
re
to
to
deploy
a
new
solver
to
run
the
which
is
needed
to
run
gnosis
protocol
on
xdi.
B
F
Yeah,
so
we're
still
running
into
the
issue
of
the
solve
of
the
like
one
hop
on
dxd
west
trade,
but
we're
currently
talking
with
felix
from
cows
hypnosis
and
we
might
be
able
to
manually
match
the
orders
ourselves.
So
we
just
have
to
pull
like
our
order
and
the
best
cell
order
of
dxd
and
we
can
potentially
match
these
together.
So
jarrod
is
actually
speaking
with
felix
right
now
and
trying
to
solve
this.
But
at
least
as
a
temporary
solution.
F
I
That's
mainly
it's.
I
really
hope
we
we
will
actually
get
it
done
with
like
the
manual
matching,
because
then
we
actually
can
like
finish
the
buyback
which
was
approved,
and
then
we
should
actually
look
for
a
better
solution.
A
B
F
I
If
we
know
exactly
how
to
how
to
construct
those
those
submissions,
we
could
also
do
like
those
5x
automated,
but
yeah.
I
B
Sweet,
so
I
think
that
kind
of
changes,
or
maybe
sets
the
frame,
how
we
should
be
framing
the
other
conversation
which
is
like
kind
of
expanded,
dxd
buyback,
purchase
options,
because
I
think
you
know,
regardless
of
what
happens,
whether
we're,
like
you
know,
hand,
cranking,
gnosis,
protocol,
d1
ourselves
for
a
week
or
two
weeks
like
we
need
a
new
solution,
execute
the
buyback.
The
buyback
program
signal
signal
proposal
clearly
laid
out
the
use
of
the
gp
relayer
and
the
gnosis
protocol
v1
to
execute
the
buyback.
B
So
we
will
need
some
other
way
to
exit
some
other
authorization
to
execute
the
buyback,
so
just
started
a
post
last
night
on
this,
I
think,
in
light
of
what
geronimo
said,
I
think
that
this
is
more
about
like
enabling
that
medium
term
execution
of
the
buyback,
so
maybe
not
something
that
we
need
to
push
through
so
quickly,
but
like
it's
something
we
need
to
do,
because
we
need
like
a
new
new
way
of
of
executing
it.
B
So
this
would
be
like
three
different
ways,
and
this
is
just
like
to
start
the
conversation.
Yet
this
is
meeting
a
lot
more
detail
and
kind
of
comments
from
other
people,
but
there
would
be
like
three
different
ways
that
this
would
could
potentially
authorize.
One
is
through
a
new
generic
relayer
that
is
hooked
into
aqua,
and
so
there's
some
kind
of
questions
about
this,
because
this
is
stuff
that
we're
still
testing,
if
not
fully
deployed.
So
it
would
be
a
little
risky
to
do
it
without
it
being
fully
fully
audited.
B
But
this
would
be
the
first
option
and
then
the
second
one
would
be
cow,
swap
integration,
and
so
cal
swap
maybe
is
possible
to
use
with
with
a
dow
and
not
need
to
just
rely
on
something
that
can
an
address
that
can
sign
signatures
and
then
the
third
one
is
like
a
member,
the
member
balance
or
purchases,
which
is
basically
to
enable
the
buyback
to
be
done
through
the
member
balance,
balancer
format
and
kind
of
lays
out.
B
Maybe
some
possibilities
for
how
that
would
would
do
there
so
open
up
for
questions
or
comments
or
this
in
general.
But,
like
I
think,
in
light
of
what
geronimo
was
saying,
I
think
that
this
is
something
we
need
to
think
about
and
maybe
put
in
put
further
thought
into
something,
but
not
something.
We
need
to
probably
execute
on
in,
like
the
next
two
to
three
days.
As
long
as
we
can
manually
execute
the
trades.
B
Cool
well,
I
guess
if
there
are
no
thoughts
on
this
yeah
we'll
be
following
along
and
kind
of
executing
on
this,
I
think
in
general.
One
of
the
things
I
do
think
we're
hoping
to
accomplish
in
lisbon
is
thinking
a
little
bit
more
about,
like
the
long
term
buyback
method,
not
just
like
kind
of
the
technical
component,
but
like
how
do
we
have
like
a
system
that
is
a
bit
more
automated
about
how
like
dxd
is
repurchased,
and
maybe
it
even
gets
into
like
revenue
and
how
that
does.
B
But
thinking
maybe
something
we
can
start
the
conversation
more
on
lisbon
on
too.
B
Cool
and
then
yeah
next
item
is
lisbon
call
schedule.
This
was
just
wanted
to
kind
of
confirm
this,
because
I
knew
that
there's
been.
We
had
like
that.
The
schedule
was
put
out.
I
saw
with
melanie
and
then
dave
that
they
put
the
booklet
together,
there's
kind
of
some
things
in
there,
but
I
know
that
we
also
will
be
some
people
that
will
be
not
attending
lisbon,
and
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
like
try
to
maintain
and
keep
some
things
ongoing.
B
So
I
guess
for
like
each
of
the
calls.
It
might
be
interesting
to
see
what
we're
planning
to
do,
at
least
for
the
wednesday
governance
discussion.
I
think
this
will
be
the
same
time
actually
1500
utc
and
we'll
probably
do
a
little,
maybe
like
a
version
of
the
weekly
one.
But
then
I
also
think
it's
going
to
be
an
opportunity
more
for,
like
a
larger
discussion
about
like
gov
2.0
and
some
of
the
other
things
that
we're
thinking
so
that
will
be
at
1
500
utc.
B
But
I
wasn't
sure
about
like
the
monday
biz
dev
call
are.
We
is
that
still
happening
at
1500
utc,
and
then
I
think,
maybe
the
friday
one
might
be
difficult
to
do,
because
people
will
be
there
but
wanted
to
just
make
it
clear
for
everyone.
C
The
monday
call,
I
think,
should
still
be
possible.
Well,
that's
the
day,
everyone's
just
gathering
right.
B
B
H
J
B
Okay,
cool
any
other
like
just
while
we're
on
it
like
logistical
things,
I
don't
know
if
the
lisbon
boys,
like
have
special
perspective
on
the
other
side,
but
any
other
like
kind
of
questions
or
people
or
comments
or
thinking
about
with
lisbon,
stuff
to
coordinate.
J
B
Okay
and
then
yeah,
I
wasn't
sure
just
only
other
thing
really
in
discussion-
was
that
there
was
a
dx
vote,
dx
gov
dev
check
in
sometimes
you
give
them
opportunity
to
do
anything
on
the
call
here.
I
think
we
just
had
a
good
discussion
about
some
of
the
priorities
for
diex
vote
over
the
coming
week
or
week
or
two
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
ross
or
gusta
wanted
to
give
an
update
on
the
the
gov
dev
efforts.
H
Lots
of
planning
a
lot
of
people
here,
have
ideas
on
how
the
export
should
work
and
what
features
should
we
have,
and
since
we
are
being
the
exports
for
ourselves
up
for
the
mainly
for
the
for
the
people
who
is
going
to
be
attending
this
one,
it's
going
to
be
great
for
ross
and
me,
I
guess,
to
hear
them
in
person.
What
do
you
think
and
what
do
they
want
to
have?
Oh,
my
god,.
B
Yeah
and
it's
it's
interesting
actually
just
tying
this
back
into
the
conversation
we're
having
before
the
caller
at
the
beginning
about
prime
dow
and
how
they're
kind
of
launching
almost
like
a
new
governance
system
and
skye,
was
talking
about
how
they're,
basically
like
plugging
in
or
taking
all
of
these
existing
pieces
like
boardroom
snapshot
and
like
combining
them
into
something
they're,
also
adding
some
of
their
own
things
like
they
have
like
a
reputation
contract
that
controls
a
multi-sig,
for
instance,
but
thinking
how
that
differs
from
what
dx,
dow
and
dx
vote
is
doing,
which
is
like
building
for
like
what
we're
doing
like
building
for
ourselves
and
like
all
new
infrastructure
and
tools,
and
the
key
like
benefit,
I
think
for
geeks
dow
is
like
we
actually
know.
B
We
have
a
good
idea
of
what
we
need,
because
we've
been
governing
ourselves
for
two
years
right
and
like
that
mean
like
sort
of
talking
about
that
priorities.
Well,
it's
like.
What's
the
thing
people
use
like
dx
dial,
the
most
for
it's
like
contributor
proposals,
right
like
that's
what
everyone
here
you
know
uses
on
a
you
know,
probably
the
most
consistent
basis.
So
like
we
need
to
make
that
flow
like
really
smooth.
B
What's
another
thing
is
like
we're
also
doing
all
these
swapper
farms
right
now
like
we
have
tons
of
proposals
that
need
to
be
kind
of
submitted,
boosted,
voted
on
on
every
chain
and
so
like.
How
can
we
make
a
flow
like
for
that?
So
I
think
it's
a
real
advantage
of
dx
vote
as
like
a
product
because,
like
that,
like
feedback
loop
of
like
using
building,
I
think
will
be
really
strong
because
we're
we're
we
do
that.
We
live
breathe
in
this
stuff
every
day.
H
So
what
what
we
are
building
is
very
different
to
what
we
are,
what
we
were
using
at
first
from
alchemy,
where
they
had
these
plugins
right,
where
you
were
just
adding
stuff
autofocus
on
top
of
your
governments
and
ds
boat.
The
way
it
was
designed
is
to
be
super
flexible,
so
we
can
add
more
stuff
like
how
can
you
say
on
chain
right?
We
don't
have
to.
H
We
don't
need
to
do
any
changing
the
ui
to
support
any
plugin
or
any
new
integration
which
we
can
just
interact
with
it
on
the
chain
on
chain
on
the
blockchain
level.
So
that's
the
way
how
how
it
was
designed.
I
don't
know
if
diamond
dao
is
taking
the
approach
of
the
plugins
like
dao
suck.
Did
we
she's
not
bad,
but
it
wasn't
flexible
enough
for
us
right.
This
is
what
this
is,
what
we
are
there.
H
This
is
what
the
this
is,
the
approach
that
we
took
on
the
export,
making
something
flexible
and
secure,
adding
also
this
permission
there
that
I
think
is
not
mentioned
a
lot,
but
it
is
very
secure.
If
you
go
to
the
permissions
view,
you
can
see
everything
that
we
can
execute
the
token
that
each
skin
can
transfer
the
contract
that
they
can
call.
This
is
a
very
important.
It's
super
powerful.
B
Awesome
and
then
just
like
a
couple
other
things
to
highlight:
maybe
myself
from
the
forum
there
is
a
post
from
tammy
could
post
on
a
proposed
legal
budget
for
for
q4.
This
is
like
a
lot
of
the
questions
and
problems
that
people
have
been
having
about
like
registering
and
getting
paid
and
all
the
tax
stuff.
So
hopefully
that
will
be
a
way
of
solving
that,
and
then
there
is
a
post
by
kenan
for
discord
rep
boost
for
q3.
B
K
Just
a
quick
comment:
I
did
submit
it
as
a
signal
proposal
this
morning
was
having
some
issues
finding
it
in
the
ui.
Again,
I
think,
maybe
because
I
was
using
the
netlify-
not
the
export.eth
maybe
could
be
related,
but
it
is
up
as
a
signal
proposal
now.
Oh.
B
Man
did
you
put.
Hopefully
this
was
like,
I
must
admit
after
I
hopefully
look
through
it
yeah.
It
was
about
30
minutes
ago
yeah,
but
yeah
anyway.
That's
so
yeah,
that's
a
sweet
thing
and
then
the
only
other
th
and
then
the
yeah.
The
two
other
things
to
highlight
in
were
the
geek
style
grant
proposal
diamond
dial
chain
verse.
There's
a
discussion
going
on
there.
I
think
that's
kind
of
interesting
and
then
the
governance,
multi
funds
refunds
round
number
five
were
submitted
there.
B
Questions
I
think
we
just
established
that
there
will
be
a
monday
call
monday,
tuesday,
wednesday
thursday
call.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
spicy
soup,
I
mean
I.
I
think
that
we
would
need
a
proposal
to
authorize
geek
style
to
like
interact
with
cal,
swap
because
I
think,
like
the
original
program
signal
proposal,
was
very
explicit
on
like
outlying
the
steps
for
the
gpu
relayer,
which
I
think
is
like
important
for
explaining,
what's
actually
kind
of
happening
under
the
hood.
But
that's
really
exciting
that
we
could
use
cow
swap
too,
and
I
think
we
should
be
continuing
to
explore
that
option.
We.
C
So,
just
to
clarify
the
the
manual
matching
is
on
gpv
one,
which
is
not
what
cow
swap
is
the
manual
matching
would
be
like.
The
salt,
instead
of
a
solver,
like
literally
someone
manually,
puts
in
a
solve
a
solved
solution
into
gpv
one
and
it
matches
the
buy
and
sell
that
are
like
existing.
So
I
think
that
that
I
mean
there's
nothing
that
says
like
anyone
in
the
world
can't
run
a
solver,
so
that
might
already
be
approved
right.
B
C
And
because
they're,
because
these
are
like
one
off
or
a
set
of
a
small
set
of
buys
and
then
sellers
can
come
in
and
leave
limit
orders
as
long
as
these
are
limit.
Orders
like
the
manual
solver
submission
is
not
necessarily
attackable
by
anyone
in
the
world
right,
because
the
only
thing
that
you
can
do
is
fill
people
within
their
limits.
So
you
could
give
you
could
give
more
benefit
to
one
side
than
the
other
side,
but
you
can't
make
someone's
price
worse
than
their
limited
order.
B
B
C
In
a
closet
like
work
really
hard,
it's
it's
it's
almost
member
balancer,
but
like
with
a
clearing
mechanism,
so
that
it
happens
instantly
rather
than
like
trust,
dx
dow
to
send
you
with,
like
a
week
later,
like
that's
effectively
what
it
is
except
it's
it's
basically,
a
clearing
mechanism
which
is
comes
from
traditional
finance
to
take
admission.
B
To
yeah
facts
into
the
the
central
node
office
to
bring
it
full
circle,
it's
kind
of
like,
like
the
member
balancer
idea,
two
isn't
like
going
back
like
safe
snap,
it's
like
when
you
put
bounds
between
what
could
be
executed
and
then
like
rely
on
someone
to
execute
it
within
that
bounds.
That's
like
part
of
the
way
of
yeah
transferring
risks
or
like
getting
execution
off
chain.
B
We
need
a
new,
updated
ui
for
mesa,
so
there
is
an
ipfs
if
there's
already
one
on
ipfs,
but
I
think
the
pricing
api.
Yes,
do.
We
have
old
mesa.e.
That
would
be
great.
I
B
B
Okay,
well,
I
think
that's
it
so
yeah
thanks
everyone
for
for
hopping
on
and
yeah
see
you
guys.