►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-06-16]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geeks.gov
discussion
for
june
16th,
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
tons
of
proposals
out
there.
We
have
23,
which
I
think
25
24
proposals,
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
x-I
and
mainnet
now.
So
I
think
part
of
this
is
because,
with
a
little
bit
of
lull
from
the
or
backlog
from
the
alchemy
problems,
but
those
seem
to
be
mostly
fixed
now
we're
yeah
moving
forward
so
starting
first
with
mainnet.
B
Three
different
signal
proposals
currently
live
number
one
expand
deep
style
to
arbor
trim,
one
two
dxd
buyback
program
parameters,
update
and
then
three
dx
events,
the
expand,
dx
style
to
arbor
term.
One
proposal
is
a
signal
proposal
that
actually
just
passed.
B
I
think
yesterday
on
xdi,
which
basically
com
three
main
things:
one
authorizes
a
swapper
deployment
on
arbor
trim,
one
two
authorizes
a
dx
vote
deployment
on
arbitrary
one
and
then
three
commits
2.25
million
of
g
style
capital
to
arbitrarily
one
either
in
the
base
there
or
in
in
swapper
on
arbitrary.
B
That
is
set
to
pass
on
mainnet,
I
think
thursday
evening,
and
then
we
will
do
some
we'll
have
a
medium
article
kind
of
based
off
of
this
plan
that
we
will
publish
on
friday
and
there
will
be
some
kind
of
joint
marketing
with
arbitrom.
I
think
that
will
probably
be
they
will
call
us
out
in
a
tweet,
but
hopefully
that
will
be
enough
to
awaken
the
marine
army
as
as
a
of
to
aware
of
geeksdown
arbortrum
and
then
the
next
one,
the
dxd
buyback
programs
parameters
update.
B
So
this
one
we
discussed
last
week
on
on
governor's
discussion,
then
we
also
had
a
post
in
the
forum
that
had
some
polls
on
different
things.
The
two
key
things
here
are
one:
it
allows
for
an
increase
in
the
slippage,
tolerance
to
five
percent
and
two.
B
It
clarifies
that
the
usd
calculation
is
at
the
time
of
purchase
the
the
dxd
date
of
acquisition,
which
should
help
us
calculate
calculate
the
exact
easier
calculate
the
buyback
as
it
hits
to
kind
of
the
one
million
goal
and
the
last
one
is
dx
events
which
dave
had
talked
about
here
and
melanie
they've
been
working
on
that.
I
think
that
the
ecc
is
is
the
the
driving
force
for
that.
I
think
this
proposal
I
think
just
got
up
this
morning.
B
I
don't
think
there
is
a
corresponding
xdi
proposal.
Maybe
that
would
be
good,
but
I
don't
know
if
dave
wanted
to
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
signal
proposal
or
melanie.
C
I
can
talk
a
little
bit
about
it.
Yes,
so
this
proposal
is
outlining
a
stipend
for
travel,
cost
and
accommodations
for
those
who
are
attending
the
ecc
conference.
Ecc
is
coming
up
in
about
a
month
from
today
and
almost
half
of
our
dx
dial
contributors
will
be
in
attendance.
So
I've
been
talking
about
the
importance
of
community
engagement,
and
this
will
be
a
great
opportunity
for
our
contributors
to
network.
C
It's
also
a
time
for
professional
development
for
computers
to
attend
the
talks
and
workshops
at
the
conference,
but
mostly,
most
importantly,
we'll
have
the
opportunity
to
meet
one
another
in
real
life.
So
take
a
look
at
this
proposal.
It's
pretty
much
outlining
travel,
cost,
accommodations
and
then
ticket
costs
for
us
to
go,
and
then
hopefully
this
will
be
the
first
of
many
proposals
to
kick
off.
Dx
events
and
dx
retreats
for
our
community
and
contributors.
D
I
just
submitted
it
on
mainnet
but
happy
to
just
submit
it
on
next
style,
of
course,
as
well.
B
Sure
and
actually
the
yeah,
so
the
both
of
the
the
buyback
program
parameters,
one
is
actually
still
live
on
x
died
too,
but
I
think
that
will
pass
this
set.
The
pet
would
pass
monday.
B
So
those
are
the
signal
proposals,
three
signal
proposals
up
and
then
next
is
the
redo
using
the
relayers.
So
this
is
additional
funding
for
omen
squad.
So
this
is
a
redo,
a
proposal
I
think
from
about
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
it
needed
a
relayer
deployed
to
allow
the
funds
to
be
transferred
to
a
smart
contract
or
of
the
multi-sig.
B
So
we
ran
into
the
same
problem
a
month
or
so
ago
after
the
berlin
hard
fork,
and
you
built
a
relayer
for
the
dev
multisig
and
said
this-
is
we
had
to
do
the
same
thing
for
the
omen
squad
multisig
and
I
think
we'll
probably
have
to
do
that
for
the
marketing
multisig
one
there.
But
this
is
just
a
redo
of
that
and
to
provide
some
funding
to
open
squad
into
some
different
some
of
the
markets
sky.
I
don't
know
if
you
had
anything
else
to
add.
E
Yeah,
that's
a
good
summary
things
got
delayed
a
little
bit
but
like
the
x-tie
team
is
excited
to
try
to
market
some
of
the
the
euro
markets
on
on
that
are
on
omen,
x-tie
the
we
have
a
goal
to
like
fund
all
the
matches,
so
like
euro
cup,
obviously
attention
gets
higher
and
higher
as
like
the
playoffs
happen,
and
the
final
approaches
right.
E
So
we
we
had
small
markets
for
all
available
early
matches
and
and
and
there
were
some
bets
and
things
on
those
and
and
those
are
being
taken
down
as
the
before
the
matches
start,
but
hopefully
we
can
get
bigger
funding
into
like
the
playoff
matches
and
and
the
xdi
team
and
and
us
we
can
try
to
spread
the
awareness
of
that
and
draw
people
in
as
well.
E
E
Yeah
I'd
be
interested
in
the
poster
one
thing
they're
still
on
main
net
I
I
was
actually
trying
to
look
at
some.
I
needed
to
like
reference,
an
old
proposal
and
a
lot
of
the
text
of
like
the
old
proposals
on
mainnet
are
not
showing
up
still
because
of
this
graph
issue.
E
If
you
actually
like
do
a
transaction
on
the
proposal,
then
the
text
shows
up
for
some
reason,
so
it's
almost
like
you
have
to
activate
it
to
like
action
it
to
get
it
to
show
up.
But
you
know
it's
pretty:
it's
pretty
useless.
If
you
can't
like
reference
old
proposals
right
now,
so
hopefully
we
can
get
that
fixed
in
the
dallas
tech
graph
team,
whatever
they
did
on
xti
is
working
if
they
can
get
that
mainnet
working
as
well.
That
would
be
pretty
important.
It's
it's.
F
Yeah,
absolutely
I'm
wondering
if
somehow
the
re-indexing
didn't
actually
get
kicked
out.
I
would
have
ping
stack
right
now
to
ask
about,
like
maybe
we
can
just
try
running
it
again.
Some
part
of
me
is
like
always
afraid
to
like
they'll,
make
it
worse
but
buddy.
I
think
we
need
that
historical
proposal.
Stuff
though.
B
No,
I'm
thinking
like
the
searching
I
mean,
I
think,
as
skye
said,
like
I'm,
I'm
oftentimes
like
trying
to
reference
proposals,
and
so
it
is
like
kind
of
if
we
can
have
be
able
to
reference
something
and
if
we
could,
you
have
to
search
for
the
proposal
like
in
the
past
and
be
able
to
pull
it
up,
and
so
it's
tough
on
alchemy
right
now,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
dx
vote
had
like
us
could
could
could
help
out
with
that.
G
Yeah
in
the
export,
we
are
showing
proposals
by
the
node
by
scheme
and
id
proposal
id
like
like
it
happens
on
alchemy,
and
we
have
a
search
bar
on
the
the
search
by
title.
G
But
the
outside
proposal
works
differently
and
they
have
the
title
in
the
ipfs
hash
and
the
one
that
we
are
going
to
use
on
the
expo.
They
are
going
to
have
it
in
the
contract,
so
we
can
search
through
them.
So
that's
something
that
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
search
by
state
and
proportion
title
on
the
export.
B
Cool
and
just
the
random
tidbits
I've
found
actually
it's
good
to
search
by
the
proposer's
address
right.
If
you're
searching
for
proposal
you
sent,
if
you
search
your
own
address,
all
of
those
proposals
come
up.
Sometimes
you
forget
the
capitalization
on
something
that
you're
searching
for
too.
So
that's
another
way
to
use
that
search
bar
on
on.
B
G
Yeah,
if
they,
if
they
open
it,
like
just
mainnet
connected
to
mainnet,
yes,
you
should,
you
should
be
able
to
see
it.
For
example,
if
you
enter
right
now,
proportion
on
the
expo
domain
it
and
you
and
you
copy
paste
a
link
somewhere.
D
A
G
Yeah
yeah,
the
problem
right
now
is
that
the
exodus
is
deployed
on
my
github
account
like
on
augusto
that
the
export,
so
since
it's
not
deployed
yet
we
cannot
use
it
like
officially
true,
but
when
it's
deployed
yes,
they're
going
to
be
like
it's
more
standardized
way
for
us
to
share
proportion
like
vote,
slash
proposal,
slash
id
and
that's
it-
you
are
going
to
show
the
proposal
anywhere.
You
are
connected.
B
G
And
also
you,
you
mentioned
the
how
to
fit
the
proposal
by
proposer.
If
you
enter
on
the
on
the
expo
right
now,
I
don't
know
if
it
works
on
mainnet,
but
we
have
the
option
to
filter
to
enter
the
user
profile
and
you're
going
to
see
the
entire
history
of
the
user
all
the
proportions
he
created
where
he
voted.
G
B
B
Then
moving
along
next
the
deep
style,
treasury
diversification,
number
21
eth
to
stables-
and
I
think
this
is
depending
on
the
calculation-
should
be
the
last
of
of
the
v2
authorization.
Is
that
right
dave?
B
I
think
yep
yeah,
so
we'll
that'll
be
seven
or
eight
days
away
from
that.
So
that's
a
good
process
of
diversifying,
I
think,
maybe
good
time
to
take
some
stock
of
of
that
process
and
outside
component
played
out
over
the
last
five
or
six
months
there
cool
and
then
next
is
a
lnlhb.com
or
inc
worker
proposal.
This
is
kermit's
dxd,
vesting
contract
that
that
he
set
up
there.
Next
is
swapper
beta
release.
B
So
this
is
a
proposal
that
I
think
actually,
yes,
it
still
needs
some
votes
on
it
and
the
quiet
it
needs
votes.
But
if
it
gets
a
vote
in
the
next
two
hours,
then
swapper
beta
will
be
officially
released.
The
ens
will
be
updated
starting
tomorrow.
I
think
at
1
15.
B
What's
that
like
16
1600,
415
utc
time
something
around
that
maybe
5
15
utc
time,
1
15
p.m,
eastern
standard
time,
so
yeah,
it's
a
huge
release.
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
on
it,
hopefully
people
have
been
trying
it
out.
You
can
go
in
and
get
the
ipfs
hash
now
and
and
start
there.
I
don't
know
if
that
had
any
other
federico
of
any
other
thoughts
on
swapper
beta
release.
J
B
And
then
next
is
set
resolver
plus
content
hash
for
tokens.omen.eth.
B
I
think
this
is
a
very
similar
proposal
we
had
about
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
which
was
basically
setting
up
this
a
similar
thing
for
swapper,
and
this
is
having
like
a
centra
central
list,
a
single
list
that
manages
the
different
token
list
across
across
the
chains,
and
so
this
is
setting
one
up
for
for
omen
there
and
it's
setting
the
ens
for
that.
H
Yeah,
it's
actually
like
the
second
try.
The
first
try
someone
use
a
multi-call
proposal
to
like
batch,
the
creation
of
the
subdomain
with
like
an
update
to
the
content
hash
and
what
people
don't
know
and
seems
like
developers
also
don't
know
is
that
once
you
create
a
subdomain,
the
subdomain
doesn't
have
a
resolver
set
up
or
configured.
So
that
is
like
a
missing
piece
which
was
missed
on
the
multi-core
proposal
and
it
seems
like
this
proposal
is
actually
like
setting
the
main
default
resolver
for
that
domain
and
then
updating
the
content
dash.
H
It's
like
this
failure
is
a
clear
signal
that
we
definitely
need
to
like
specify
the
approach
of
like
how
to
create
a
sub
like
a
sub
domain
on
ens
names,
naming
servers
and
yeah.
If
we,
if
you
would
have
like,
created
a
guide,
I
think
that
wouldn't
be
missed.
So
I
think
that
is
something
we
can
improve
on.
B
Yeah
and
I
think
sub
domains
are,
I
mean
we
can't
increasingly
using
more
and
more
of
them
and
probably
more
in
the
future,
so
something
to
think
about.
B
I'm
glad
you
explained
it
because
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
proposal
was
like
a
week
ago,
because
we
didn't
have
this
is
when
it
didn't.
Have
the
you
couldn't
see
the
content
proposal,
you
could
just
see
what
the
multi
calls
were
and
it
was
hard
to
figure
out.
I
wasn't
sure
exactly
what
it
was,
but
I
guess
they
were
trying
to
do
those
two
steps
into
one.
B
Cool
just
a
couple
more
on
mainnet
a
couple:
different
buyback,
related
proposals,
so
the
first
funding
proposal
for
the
the
mainnet
buyback
actually
went
through
and
was
executed,
I
think
on
sunday
night,
but
there
was
a
delay
in
the
multi-call
scheme
proposal
for
that
that
was
primarily
due
to
the
issues
with
alchemy,
but
we
have
submitted
both
of
we've
submitted
two
buyback
order
through
the
multicall
scheme
on
mainnet.
B
B
B
Cool
then,
on
xdi
tons
of
proposals
here
too
so
proposal
to
fund
the
omen,
explainer
marketing
video.
This
is
something
tammy's
been
pushing
and
posting
the
forum.
We've
chatted
about
it
a
bit,
and
this
is
kind
of
important
for
the
omen,
token,
rollout
and
and
and
there.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
good
initiative
to
expand
some
of
the
things
we're
using
for
marketing
taming
or,
if
you
had
anything
else
to
add.
K
Yeah,
actually
one
thing
just
that
I'm
going
to
add
to
the
forum,
so
I
actually
received
two
invoices
for
this
proposal
and
I
need
to
clarify
it
and
I
had
both
invoices
and
I
had
received
a
discount
on
the
project
from
I
think
it
was
like
10
800
euros
to
9800
euros.
K
K
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
like
a
deal
breaker
and
I
need
to
resubmit
the
proposal
or
not
I'll,
put
it
on
the
forum
and
show
both
of
the
like,
basically
put
the
invoice
or
whatever
for
both
of
those
things
in
the
form.
So
we
can
see
the
difference
my
thought
was.
K
I
can
either
cancel
this
proposal
and
do
a
new
proposal
or
we
can
just
let
this
proposal
go
through
and
just
you
know,
I
pay
the
first
50
and
hold
on
to
that
remaining
10
until
the
whole
thing's
over
or
give
it
back
to
the
dow.
However,
people
want
to
do
it.
It's
like,
essentially,
I
think,
like
a
700
difference.
Basically,
in
the
amount
of
money
I
should
be
paying
elio
versus
like
what
they
actually
put
in
the
initial
proposal.
K
K
Then
they
basically
delayed
and
couldn't
get
me
the
the
video
when
in
the
time
that
I
requested
so
they
offered
a
discount.
So
I
had
like
two
different
invoices
from
them
when
it
came
time
to
actually
put
the
proposal
up,
I
was
I
couldn't.
I
basically
took
me
a
second
to
figure
out
which
invoice
it
was
so
when
I
first
put
the
post
up,
I
had
the
correct
information
in
there
and
then
I
thought
it
was
the
wrong
information.
K
K
So
I'll
put
this
information
like
in
written
form,
so
it's
not
so
confusing
on
on
dow
talk,
it
was
in
response
to
kaiden
actually
asking
for
a
copy
of
the
quote
and
the
information
regarding
like
when
we'll
do
like
the
follow-ups,
and
it's
all
in
the
quote,
so
yeah
it's
up
to
everyone.
If
we
want
to
like
just
cancel
this
time,
I
can
even
like
vote
against
it
or
we
can
vote
it
through
and
I
can
just
like
return.
B
Yeah,
I
mean
I
think
I
always
like
to
be
flexible
with
the
proposals
and
knowing
that
the
proposal
has
like
already
gone
through
and
boosted
right
and
the
quickest
way
to
get
it
is
for
this
proposal
to
go
through.
So
there's
any
way
to
make
it
with
this
proposal
that
can
answer
and
all
of
the
concerns.
I
think
that's
that's
the
ideal
one
I
think
with
this
one.
It's
it's
like
there
doesn't.
B
The
funds
are
eventually
going
to
go
there,
and
so,
as
long
as
like
the
overall
number
to
deak
style
is
like
the
same
and
there's
no
kind
of
contrast
on
that.
I
also
think
it
wouldn't
be
a
bad
idea.
You
could
just
literally
send
the
700
back
to
xdxdow
and
then
just
claim
it
for
the
next
proposal
when
you
do
the
the
the
next
payment,
but
I
think
whatever
it
is,
is
just
kind
of
documenting
it.
K
Okay,
great,
so
that
makes
sense
to
me
so
yeah
I'll
put
the
just
so
everyone's
aware
I'll
put
both
quotes,
so
it
shows
what
the
confusion
was
basically
you'll.
It's
like
in
the
whole
history,
basically
of
the
cost,
difference
and
yeah
the
amount
that
I
requested
would
eventually
go
to
the
video
company
anyways,
but
just
to
make
things
simpler,
I
think
just
like
let
the
proposal
go
through
and
then
I'll
just
send
the
money
back.
That's
like
the
difference,
basically
between
the
down
payment
and
just
like
what
rose
requested.
H
Yeah,
I
think
the
fact
that
there
needs
to
be
a
second
proposal
anyway,
right
to
like
receive
the
the
total
amount
at
the
end
of
the
day
and
the
fact
like
it's,
it's
actually
great
that
we
get
like
a
discount.
So
I
think
that
it's
it's
a
win
for
the
dick
so
and
that
can
also
be
clarified
on
the
second
proposal.
B
It's
crazy
how
solutions
are
or
how
many
solutions
are
just:
oh,
just
send
money
to
geeks
down.
That's
like
an
easy
thing,
because
it's
like
an
easy
one
way
there
and
you
can
always
it's
like
the
member
balancer
approach,
but
cool
okay,
and
then
there
is
just
looking
at
xdi
proposals.
I
guess
jumping
around
oh
little
bit.
So
there
is
the
funding
proposal
for
the
swapper
farming
liquidity
relayer.
So
this
is
140
x,
dxd
and
15.3
weft
to
the
swap
performing
liquidity
relayer.
That
was
liquidity
relay
that
was
tested.
B
We
had
a
test
proposal
earlier
on
on
on
monday
there,
and
so
this
would
just
be
the
funding
proposal
that
we
actually
still
waiting
to
do.
The
actual,
I
guess,
campaign
creation
proposals
or
the
multi-call
proposal
that
actually
creates
the
farming
campaigns
themselves.
We
still
needed
that
for
both
mainnet
and
next
I.
But
this
is
the
farming
proposal
there
and
then
there
are
contributor
proposals
for
caney
fork,
myself,
hexel
and
dev
violet
and
those
are
those
are
and
then
on
the
xdi
side.
B
In
terms
of
the
the
buyback
there's
a
couple
different
things
there,
we
actually
have
three
proposals
that
are
that
are
in
the
queue
there
number
nine
and
then
number
10
and
then
actually
just
submitted
and
boosted,
but
right
before
the
call
number
11.,
and
so
those
should.
B
If
you
check
out
the
buyback
orders
sheet,
we
should
have
there's
a
little
bit
of
coordination
here,
because
if
you
have
x-die
proposals
that
take
five
days
and
then
mainnet
proposals
that
take
eight
days
and
the
buy-back
program
you're
supposed
to
have
not
more
than
one
a
day,
so
we've
been
I've
been
trying
to
line
these
up.
So
we
we
should
have
starting,
I
think,
on
friday,
almost
a
proposal
every
every
day,
starting
with
xdi
and
then
switching
over
to
mainnet.
B
B
And
yeah-
and
then
it's
related
to
that
there
are
two
proposals
in
the
multi-call
scheme
for
requesting
west
back
to
dow.
So
if
you'll
recall,
we
had
proposals
to
do
this
for
dxd
a
week
a
week
and
a
half
ago,
and
so
this
is
the
dxd
that
was
acquired
through
the
buyback
right
through
the
noses
protocol
relayer
getting
that
dxd
back
into
x-state
style
and
that's
actually
the
the
dxt
that's
being
used
for
the
farming
campaigns.
B
But
there
is
also
some
weft
that
stuck
into
the
west
in
gnosis
protocol
from
orders
that
weren't
filled
and
orders
that
then
expired.
So
the
question
is
like
how
to
get
this
weft
either
back
to
dick
style.
Or
how
do
we
get
this
wealth
to
be
used
for
no
for
new
buyback
proposals
since
we're
doing
some
of
those?
So
I
think
the
the
conclusion
is
that
it
actually
has
to
come
back
for
has
actually
come
back
to
xd
extil
first
and
then
the
other
proposal
can
go.
B
So
this
is
a
proposal.
It's
actually
two
different
proposals
to
first
request
the
withdrawal
and
then
to
actually
withdraw
the
wef,
and
I
think
that'll
be
the
way
that
we
have
to
get
the
weath
back
from
that.
But
presumably
then,
just
from
there
we'll
send
actually
the
the
latest
buyback
proposal
actually
relies
on
wealth
from
some
of
the
wealth
from
this
proposal
going
through.
So
hopefully,
it'll
just
be
like
a
circle
of
that,
and
it's
just
another
thing
that
we
need
to
coordinate
around.
F
Yeah,
so
the
gnosis
protocol
really
doesn't
have
the
flexibility
to
like
re-issue
orders
on
nurse's
protocol
from
like
excess
capital.
That's
like
didn't
get
used
on
previous
orders,
there's
a
check
that
makes
sure
that
the
it
has
the
balance
on
the
relay
itself,
which
in
general
makes
sense,
but
it
like
limits
the
flexibility
a
bit
here
so
just
like
chris
said
we're
going
to
do
the
full
round
trip
before
things.
F
Yeah,
I
thought
that
too,
but
it
actually
so
there's
two
steps,
this
kind
of
characteristic
of
gnosis
protocol,
but
there's
actually
two
steps
to
withdraw
from
nurses
protocol.
F
So
so
you
have
the
two
proposals
that
that
you
know
the
first
one
actually
does
that
first
thing
that,
like
you,
have
to
tell
those
vertical
that
you
want
to
withdraw
first
and
then
the
the
second
thing
you
have
to
do
notice.
This
protocol
is
withdraw
the
the
reason
we
can't
do
what
you
just
said,
which
is
like
leave
it
in
the
relayer
and
then
do
another
proposal
is
that
the
function
in
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer?
That
does
the
second
step
on
nessus
protocol
also
just
automatically
sends
it
back
to
the
dow.
F
So
that's
gonna,
it
doesn't
stay
in
the
relay
or
actually
like
at
any
point
so
yeah.
There
may
be
actually
I'm
a
little
rusty
on
like
the
thinking
on
this.
I
think
that
that
may
be
important
in
general
because
you
could
potentially
have
capital
like
going
in
for
other
things
too.
I
don't
know
I
mean
the
checks
are
good,
but
it
does
limit
the.
B
Flexibility,
but
I
mean
I
think
this
is
somewhat
related
to
the
tokens
omen
comment
that
drawn
was
making
earlier
about
it's
just
like
us
doing
these
and
figuring
these
things
out.
We
we
do
learn
a
lot
about
how
to
how
to
operate
and
yeah
it's
it's
tough
to
simulate
everything
and
kind
of
think
of
everything.
Nothing
kind
of
replaces
just
doing
it
and
adjusting
to
to
things
that
things
that
you
run
into.
B
Cool
well,
that's
I
was
gonna,
say
it
for
the
proposal
roundup,
but
that's
like
a
lot.
I
know
that
was
a
big
chunk
of
them.
Any
any
thoughts
on
on
proposals
outstanding.
L
So
I
have
a
question
about
the
process,
because
I
have
an
idea
for
a
proposal
for
omen,
so
basically
it
would
be
a
proposal
to
change
some
parameters
with
omen,
which
would
reduce
impermanent
loss
so
is.
Is
that
something
that
should
be
done
just
working
with
the
omen
team,
or
is
that
something
that
should
have
an
actual
proposal
to
do
it?.
F
Yes,
I
guess,
like
it
probably
makes
sense
in
general
to
talk
to
the
omen
squad
about
any
kind
of
like
configuration
change
for
the
dap
or
the
smart
contracts.
To
like
to
really
answer
that
question.
I
guess
we'd
have
to
understand
whether
it's
even
yeah,
whether
the
change
could
be
made
via
proposal
or
does
there
have
to
be
like
a
deployment
of
smart
contracts
or
I
guess
it
depends
what
the
change
is.
L
K
Yeah
and
one
other
thing
just
like
process
wise,
like
I
think
it's
also
just
like
for
figuring
out
your
own
thoughts.
It
could
be
great
to
just
like
write
it
in,
like
a
discussion
style
forum
proposed
to
see
you
know
just
like
general
feedback
from
the
squad
and
the
community
about
the
idea
and
yeah
like.
Obviously,
you
write
a
lot,
so
that
could
be
a
good
idea
as
well,
and
then
people
can
you
know
the
excitement
around.
It
will
also
kind
of
direct
whether
or
not
it's
like
worthwhile
for
the
the
squad
to
work
on.
F
Yeah,
you
can
definitely
like
ping
in
the
development
channel
or,
if
you
want
to
do
it
privately.
Just
like
dm
some
of
the
devs
and
like
yeah,
for
example,
some
things
are
configurable
via
proposal
like
we
can
set
the
protocol
fee
on
swapper
right,
but
other
things
you
know
are
maybe
hard-coded
in
a
smart
contract
and-
and
you
can't
just
change
with
like
a
proposal
that
adjusts
the
existing
things
that
would
like
involve
basically
redeploying
the
product.
It
kind.
L
Okay,
the
change
would
be
basically
adding
a
fee
for
early
withdrawal
of
liquidity,
but
I'll
make
a
forum
post
about
it.
So,
thanks
for
the
suggestion,
yeah.
L
B
Technically
style
governance
is
permissionless
right,
so
there's
nothing
kind
of
like
stopping
any
proposals
being
submitted,
but
I
think
that
the
general
consensus,
all
proposals
should
somehow
start
in
the
forum
right,
that's
a
specific
thread,
or
you
see
things
like
the
the
treasury
diversification
authorization
program,
how
that
post
is
referenced
in
subsequent
proposals,
the
same
thing
for
the
buyback
ones.
So
any
proposal
like
at
some
point
should
have
its
lineage.
B
I
think
in
the
in
the
forum
and
I
think
to
john's
point,
it's
good
to
think
about
what
exactly
is
governable
right
and
so
there's
the
protocol
level
right
where,
like
these
are
the
smart
contracts,
and
there
are
certain
actual
things
you
can
raise,
lower
or
kind
of
change
or
the
the
the
broader
governance
power,
which
is.
This
is
omen.
B
This
is
swapper
and
like
dxdao,
is
kind
of
anointing
that,
and
that's
obviously
through
these
ens
proposals
that
are
that
are
actually
changing
the
product
itself
and
that's
the
ultimate
like
governance
power,
but
there's
a
lot
of
things
kind
of
wrapped
in
and
what
would
get
into
those
changes
itself
and
so
yeah.
F
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
technically
possible
that
you
could
fork
the
repo
make
the
change
yourself
and
propose
it
to
the
dx.
Now
right,
that's
that's
actually
possible
and
that's
an
important
part
of
how
we're
set
up.
But
you
know
practically
speaking
as
like
a
full-time
contributor,
it
makes
sense
to
talk
to
the
devs
on
the
squad
to
get
their
feedback
yeah
in
general.
B
Because,
like
what
would
make
rep
holders
like
vote
on,
oh
this
new
ens
proposal
like
comes
through,
it's
like
I
mean
I'm
a
rep
holder
and
I
look
at
all
the
proposals.
I
would
talk
to
the
squad
and
talk
to
different
people
and
want
to
understand
that,
but
yeah
it's
does
it
it's
anyone
could
technically.
You
know
we
can
do
it
and
that's
that's
important
for
the.
L
B
Cool
yeah
and
then
just
some
the
discussion
items
a
couple
things
to
chat
about
today.
There's
been
some
good
discussion
on
mesa
or
aqua
and
martin's
been
been
chatting
about
this
a
little
bit
and
thinking
about
how
like
mesa's
next
step
and
wanting
to,
I
guess,
move
to
aqua,
and
I
think
the
the
question
is,
if
even
if
everyone
has
consensus
or
that's
kind
of
the
direction,
is
there
like
some
governance
signal
that
we
need
or
like
what
should
the
process
be
for
rebranding,
a
product
or
product?
So
martin?
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
I'm
not
sure
calling
it
a
rename
like
this
is
a
totally
separate
product
mesa.
We're
using
mesa
right
now.
We're
using
it
on
for,
for
buybacks
mesa
is
the
gnosis
protocol.
V1,
we
have
a
new
product,
we
have
a
new
product
called
carrot,
we
didn't
rename
it
to
carrot,
it's
called
carrot.
We
have
a
new
product
which
does
idea,
it
does
token
offerings
and
we
need
to
name
it
right.
F
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
publicly
that
that
thinking
makes
sense
right,
like
I
think
and
internally,
like
if
there's
a
lineage
there
right
where
it's
like
okay,
they're
ideas
of
mesa.
That's
why,
like
you
know,
continued
development
and
the
money
that
was
spent
like
makes
sense,
so
it's,
but
I
mean
I,
I
basically
agree
with
sky
like
outwardly
facing
like
anybody
in
the
community.
It's
gonna
be
a
completely
new
product,
essentially
yeah.
That's
true.
A
B
But,
okay,
I
I
think
it's
a
sky's
point
is
also
kind
of
related
to
it.
Kaden's
question
about
like
what
can
a
proposal
do
and
like
in
this
case?
B
It's
really
not
like
kind
of
we're,
not
really
that
interested
in
that
at
all
we're
kind
of
this,
this
new
product,
this
new
thing
and
creating
something
new
and
so
like
what
is
the
governance
process
for
for
naming
that,
and
I
think
yeah
I
mean
a
signal
proposal
kind
of
going
through
that,
I
think,
is
the
best
bet
and
we'll
see
how
people
kind
of
react.
B
But
I
I
think
it
is
important
that
we
don't
use
that
we
try
to
use
language
ourselves
that
is
feeding
into
the
brand
of
aqua
and
and
not
not
falling
into
the
the
old
ways.
A
E
Yeah
that
what
martin
was
just
saying
is
we
were
discussing
also
if
at
some
point
like
actually
knows
just
proto
call
v1
like
is
not
usable,
something
has
to
happen
with
mesa.eth
right
like
you,
either
have
to
put
a
a
dead
landing
page
or
a
redirect
to
the
external
homepage
or
something
you
can't
just
leave
mesa.etha
as
it
is.
We
should
also
think
about
that.
Maybe
with
rails,
I
think
rails
like
works
as
it
is,
but
maybe
there's
another
note
we
could
put
on
there.
E
F
Yeah,
I
think
one
of
the
nice
things
is:
if
there's
like
a
launch
of
a
different
product,
then
the
mesa.e,
like
the
in
terms
of
withdrawals
and
people
being
able
to
go
back
and
get
whatever
they
can
like.
We
don't
really
have
to
worry
about
redirecting
people.
We
just
need
to
change
the
messaging
on
the
main
page
that
it's
not
actively
being
maintained.
L
F
E
A
B
E
And,
and
generally
people
here
are
okay
with
the
idea
of
like
the
squad,
that's
been
working
on
the
product,
suggesting
a
name
and
some
of
the
logic
and
reasons
why,
for
like
a
potential
naming
of
a
product
and
saying,
are
there
any
like
out
like
total
like,
or
is
anyone
totally
against
this
and,
if
so
like?
Are
there
other
suggestions,
rather
than
like
start
from
the
ground
up
with,
like
a
whole
like
submit
from
the
community
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff?
E
H
Yeah,
I
think
the
diesel
would
kind
of
shoot
in
his
own
foot
if,
if
the
dig
star
would
basically
decide
against
the
working
group
itself
right,
if
the
working
group
is
unhappy,
then
the
the
work
results
of
the
working
group
will
probably
need
to
be
greater
like.
I
think
we
should
encourage
bottom
up
as
much
as
we
can
and
if
the
team
says
rebrand
then
there's
a
like.
It
should
be
very
high
chance
that
the
dxr
should
go
with
it.
G
G
It's
not
that
they
are
going
against
they're
going.
I
guess
against
the
wishes
of
the
of
the
team.
Who,
like
I
mean,
if
you
have
a
team
in
argentina,
they
would
they
would
want
to
name
it.
I
know
mate
or
something
also
something
like
if
this
is
just
an
option
or
an
issue
by
the
team
and
most
likely
the
exam
will
support
it,
but.
F
Yeah
I
go
back
to
what
nylon
said
about,
like
you:
can
teach
that
runs
on
initiative
kind
of
thing.
It's
sort
of
like,
like
any
other
sort
of
significant
moves
like
there
needs
to
be
enough
of
a
consensus
right
and
it
sort
of
makes
sense
that
it
would
emanate
from
the
squad.
I
mean
that
sort
of
makes
sense,
but
if
it
was
like
a
terrible
idea,
then
it
would
probably
get
some
pushback.
G
G
B
All
right:
well,
thanks
martin,
I
think
that's
at
least
half
path
forward
and
sky
yeah,
okay
cool,
just
moving
along
swapper
update.
I
didn't
really
have
much
to
say,
except
I
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
about
the
government's
call
that
swapper
token
is
being
discussed.
There's
been
some
calls
about
it,
there's
a
document
in
the
that's
floating
around
the
key
base
so
for
any
thoughts,
and
then
I
think
we'll
be
meeting
more
and
then
hopefully
getting
a
forum
post
up
soon.
Zed.
I
don't
know.
I
No
not
not
much,
I
think
the
only
thing,
maybe
john,
what
you
said
that
we
might
repeat,
is
just
the
process
of
how
we
deploy
stuff.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
a
right
call
to
talk
about
it,
but.
F
J
I
don't
think
it's
super
intuitive
and
yeah
go
ahead.
Yeah
I
was
go.
I
would
say
I'm
going
to
extract
like
that.
One
minute,
video
of
you
basically
explaining
and
I
got
accepted,
to
talk
and
if
so,
I'm
gonna.
Basically
I
don't
know
if
I'm
gonna,
like
you
know
like
play
it,
but
definitely
like
this
is
this
is
an
interesting
process.
You're.
G
B
I
I
think
I
think
we
should
lead
with
with
like
how
does
do
anything,
and
I
think
how
does
should
deploy
is
a
very,
very
nice
topic,
because
we
don't
see
a
lot
of
projects
do
this
and
yeah.
We
still
also
exploring
what
is
the
best
way.
F
Yeah-
and
so
I
can
go
over
that
again
now-
I'm
a
little
anxious
that
I
won't
do
as
good
of
a
job
as
I
did
on
the
video
that
nylon
wants
to
cut,
but
like
it's,
basically
not
like
you're
used
to
with
other
projects,
deploying
right
like
a
typical
web
2
company
and
really
most
crypto
projects
like
you
know
they
have
a
dev
team.
They
deploy
and
they're
like
there.
It
is
it's
up
like
go,
have
fun
right
like
that's,
not
how
dx
now
works
because
we're
trying
to
build.
F
You
know
a
scalable
decentralized
like
resilient
organization.
We
have
a
little
bit
of
a
different
process
and
it's
it's.
It's
sort
of
like
three
steps
right,
and
so
the
first
step
is
well,
it's
a
it's
a
lengthy
process,
but
it
culminates
in
a
release
of
the
product.
So
the
first
step
is
this:
the
squad
the
dev
squad
like
for
that
product,
swapper
squad
finishing
what
they
think
is
like
a
release
like
this
beta
release
and
then
announcing
it
to
the
public
right.
F
So
we
do
that,
like
on
key
base
and
discord,
you
know,
potentially
it
could
be
done
through
other
channels
too,
but
but
what
that
does?
Is
it
basically
tells
the
world
that
this
thing
is
ready
to
be
deployed
right
and
then
there's
the
second
step,
which
is
actually
deploying
the
the
new
release
the
product
to
ipfs,
where
it
lives,
and
anybody
can
do
this.
It's
been
publicly
announced
by
the
squad.
F
You
can
verify
that
the
build
is
the
same,
that
it
like
produces
the
same
ipfs
hash
as
what
the
squad
was
getting,
and
so
anybody
can
put
this
ipfs
and
and
make
a
proposal
then
right.
So
it
has
to
be
the
same
person
right
because
that
deploys
ibus.
F
That
makes
the
proposal
because
only
they're
gonna
know
where
it
is,
unless
they
somehow
told
other
people
right,
but
you
can
say:
okay,
hey
it's
deployed
and
now
here's
the
proposal
and
the
proposal
is
teeing
up
the
third
step,
which
is
the
consensus
and
acceptance
of
that
proposal
by
the
dowry.
So
after
voting
happens
and
if
the
proposal
passes,
the
final
step
is
that
the
content
hash
field
on
the
els
name,
that
dxnow
owns
so
like
swapper.eth
for
the
beta
that
gets
updated
to
point
to
that
ipfs
hash.
So
so
three
steps
right.
F
It's
like
release
deployment
and
proposal
and
then
like
acceptance
by
the
dao
that
resolves
the
ems
thing.
I
think
the
point
I
was
making
yesterday
was
that
there's
really
like
two
key
features
here:
that
we're
after
and
one
is,
is
separating
the
developers
from
the
actual
like
deployment
and
launch
of
the
product.
I
think
it's.
F
It
adds
like
flexibility
and
it
gives
devs
more
like
security
basically,
and
so
it
allows
the
dow
to
be
more
powerful
by
enabling
you
know
james,
to
do
work
and
without
having
to
like
take
on
any
kind
of
like
legal
risk
of
deployment
or
ownership
of
the
actual
product
right.
I
think
that
ties
into
you
know
how
people
see
code
as
free
speech.
The
other
important
aspect
of
this
is
is
like
verifiability
right.
So
in
order
for
this
to
be
a
scalable
decentralized
process,
verifiability
is
like
a
very
key
aspect.
F
That's
like
why
block
you
know
if
you
look
at
how
blockchain
technology
works,
it's
sort
of
at
the
core
of
of
everything
right.
So
the
fact
that
you
get
this
reproducible
hash
of
the
product
build
for
the
beta
release
is
really
important,
because
that
enables
you
know
anybody
to
deploy
it
and
have
confidence
that
they're
deploying
what
the
devs
had
released
and
it
allows
anybody
to
look
at
the
proposal
and
verify
that
the
thing
that
was
deployed
is
what
the
devs
released
in
the
code
that
you
get.
F
Anybody
can
also
see
on
on
github
to
again
just
to
like
verify
so
so
yeah
separating
devs
from
deployment
and
verifiability
of
the
product
for
the
like
entire
collective,
basically
for
the
entire
world,
essentially.
B
And
verifying
proposals
is
really
fun
too,
because
it's
just
like
you
just
get
the
right
answers
or
you.
Hopefully
you
should
so
and
there's
you
know
a
lot
of
the
proposals
like
have
steps
of
verification.
You
like
going
to
etherscan
black
scout
you're
learning
a
little
bit
more
about
it.
So
it's
cool.
F
Yeah-
and
I
mean
that's
a
good
practice
with
the
proposals-
is
they?
The
proposal
should
be
explaining
how
to
verify
right
so
that
it's
not
like
some
opaque
process.
I
mean
it
is
usually
a
little
bit
technical
and
you
need
to
maybe
have
some
software
or
whatever,
but
it
is.
It
is,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
a
pretty
straightforward
process,.
G
Also,
it's
awesome
that
you
are
recreating
the
the
application
that
is
going
to
be
hosted
online.
I
mean
locally,
you
have
a
hash
of
it
and
you
are
verifying
with
your
with
your
peers
with
your
co-workers
and
everyone
is
getting
the
same
cash.
So
that's
how
every
dap
that
is
managing
or
that
is
handling
funds
should
work
right.
You
should
you
should
be
able
to
trust
100
that
the
debt
and
the
code
that
you
are
using
is
the
one
that
is
deployed
and
we
on
the
exam.
G
We
provide
that
insurance
that
if
the
code
that
you
are
using,
it
was
verified
by
us
and
it
cannot.
It
cannot
be
changed
or
the
only
way
to
change
it
if
it
is
if
it
if
it
go
through
a
proposal
right.
So
it's
super
safe
where
other
apps
like
they
have.
You
are
consuming
the
app
from
a
server,
so
they
can
change
it
anytime.
They
want,
they
can
be
attacked,
they
can
have
them
at
app.
They
can
add
some
one
line
of
code
can
make
you
send
transactions
to
an
address.
That
is
not.
G
That
is
not
the
one
that
you
want
to
use
and
you
can
lose
a
lot
of
funds,
so
our
apps,
I
think,
are
the
maybe
the
most
secure
around
because
they
are
verified
by
an
entire
organization,
and
the
deployment
process
is
very
tough.
It's
very
hard.
B
Awesome
stuff,
I
just
want
this
to
be
packaged
in
a
way
and
somehow
respond
to
all
of
the
dow
professionals
that
have
proliferated
twitter,
the
last
like
month,
that
have
like
ideas
on
like
what
what
dells
are
doing
and
like
changing,
and
it
just
seems
like
this
type
of
these
type
of
things-
is
really
where,
like
the
innovation
is
happening,
the
conversation
is
happening
not
in
in
platitudes,
about
like
people
working
seamlessly
through
the
blockchain,
but.
F
It's
like
it's,
like
the
you
know
that
food
expert
in
new
york
right
that
wrote
about
the
thing
about
without
actually
eating
the
big
mac.
It's
like
what
we.
E
E
E
They
see
they
plus
most
people,
don't
seem
to
care
if
a
product
is
actually
owned
by
a
dow.
Now
it
matters
when
regulatory
people
come
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff-
and
that's
you
know
it
only
matters
when
it
matters
right,
like
decentralization
only
matters
when
it
matters,
but
at
this
point
like
people,
don't
really
care
that
much
like
well.
F
So
this
yeah,
this
always
happens
in
a
bull
market,
though
right
like
in
a
bull
market,
people
lose
their
way,
but
you
got
to
remember
the
reason
this
entire
space
exists
right
like
it's
all.
It
goes
back
like
you
read
the
original
bitcoin
wiper,
it's
all
about
the
decentralization
right
and
like.
Ultimately,
if
you
aren't
true
to
that
like-
and
I
like
listening,
you
should
everybody
should
listen
to
chris
dixon
and
talk
about
like
the
pure
form
versus
like
the
weak
form
of
technology
like
the
pure
form.
F
He
says
it's
very
like
the
pure
form
ends
up
winning
right
but
like
in
these
like
hype
cycles,
you
get
people
like
propagating
and
talking
about
and
like
feeling
good
about,
like
the
weak
forms,
because
I
mean
they're
maximizing
for
something
right,
like
they're,
making
money
they're
increased,
increasing
their
twitter
follower
account
they're,
like
you,
know,
shilling
some
something
right,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
you
know,
gravity
pulls
everything
back
down
to
earth
and
this
space
is
driven
by
decentralization
and
that's
like.
Ultimately,
what
what
matters.
B
Yeah
I'm
just
trying
to
like
read.
I
just
read
twitter
without
pulling
my
hair
out,
but
I
think
it's
yeah
it's
time.
F
G
J
G
The
next
governance
call
go
around
it
again
and
review
it
in
the
in
the
public
call,
so
everyone
can
see
what
we
are
pursuing
because
the
manifesto
kind
of
got
lost.
It
was
a
big
deal
last
year,
but
now
you
can.
I
was
lost
right
once
we
read
it,
but
it
would
be
good
to
revisit
it
again.
Yeah.
G
I
So
I
think
we
should
definitely
try
to
get
that
language
into
the
landing
page,
the
new
landing
page.
If,
if
that
document
is
that
important,
we
want
everyone
to
not,
they
don't
need
to
read
everything,
but
the
the
main
points
we
should
to
integrate
that
to
to
the
like
the
brand.
Somehow
I
think
it's
relevant.
I
actually
didn't
think
about
it
when
we
started
talking
about
the
landing
page,
but
I
don't
know
keenan,
maybe
keenan
did.
K
So
there's
technical,
decentralization,
then
there's
organizational
decentralization
and
I
know
the
manifesto
gets
into
it
a
little
bit,
but
we
need
to
like
define
kind
of
maybe
it's
a
good
time
like
annual
revisit
or
something
when
the
manifesto
was
first
voted
on
about
like
where
we
are
in
that
process
and
what
we
need
to
improve
upon
to
be
truly
decentralized,
and
I
think
that
also
plays
hugely
into
governance,
2.0
and
giving
dxd
holders
their
say
in
in
voting
on
the
stuff
with
dx
down
the
treasury-
and
I
know
that's
like
on
our
agenda,
but
I
think
that's
part
of
the
discussion.
H
Yeah,
I
think
that's
like
a
super
super
important
initiative,
basically
reflecting
on
the
decentralization
pro
progress
right
and
the
beauty
is
we.
H
B
F
H
B
Definitely
we
are
running
just
over
the
hour,
but
augusto
I
wanted
to
if
you
had
a
dx
vote,
update
or
looking
for
some
scheme
parameters.
G
C
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
so,
as
discussed
earlier
we're
starting
more
work
on
dx
events.
We
have
our
first
signal
proposal
up
on
mainnet
and
we'll
have
it
up
soon
on
exeter
as
well.
C
C
There
have
been
many
updates
to
the
following
areas:
contributor
levels
and
increase
in
compensation
just
to
meet
market
standards
and
new
parameters
around
dxd
calculations.
The
plan
is
to
have
a
post
up
on
dow
talk
next
monday
and
I'll
walk
everyone
through
the
details
of
the
new
contributor
compensation
level
guide
and
compensation
in
next
week's
meeting.
So
that's
just
a
quick
update
on
contributor
ux
and
then
we
can
move
to
gusto.