►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-06-02]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
Welcome
to
deep
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
june,
2nd
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
five
on
mainnet
there
are
five
proposals
boosted
or
pending
boosting
one
first
is
a
worker
proposal
for
roy
who
had
been
working
on
omen.
Next
is
a
proposal
to
claim
mainnet
rep
for
caney
fork.
This
is
a
proposal
I
submitted
in
order
to
start
the
process
of
sinking
mainnet
rep
awards,
given
the
price
of
gas
the
last
week,
or
so,
I
think
it's
an
opportunity
for
a
lot
of
others.
C
I'm
hoping
more
people
will
take
advantage
of
this
to
to
claim
their
their
maintenance,
rep
just
make
sure
and
paste
and
and
paste
the
previous
proposals
from
xdi
where
you've
earned
that
rep,
then
there's
treasury
diversification
number
20,
which
is
east
to
stables.
This
is
a
couple:
it's
a
250,
eth
conversion.
I
think
it's
susd
and
usdt,
but
we've
done
we
just
had
another.
We
had
a
two
proposals
passed
last
week.
C
I'm
going
to
have
it
maybe
a
brief
update
on
treasury
later
and
then
there
is
additional
funding
for
omen
squad
0.3,
which
was
just
boosted,
and
I
do
want
to
highlight.
I
think
this
proposal
is
going
to
cause
some
problems
because
it's
not
using
a
relayer
to
go
to
the
multi-sig,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
let's
be
submitted
well.
C
Yeah,
maybe
just
I
guess
you
can't
the
relay
or
contract
is
deployed
for,
like
that's
a
speci
like
for
each
multi-say
or
something
right,
you
would
have
to
have
a
separate
one
for
that.
D
F
D
Yeah
I
mean,
I
suspect
it
would
be
a
problem,
the
next
step,
because
it's
the
old
transfer
function,
which
like
puts
a
limit
on
the
amount
of
gas
and
because
you
know
the
multisig,
I
guess
the
newer
new
hypnosis
safe
multi-cigs
are,
after
the
berlin
heart
fork
or
doing
something
with
a
fallback
function
which
uses
more
than
the
hard-coded
limit.
So
unless,
like
nissan
safe,
is
not
upgraded
on
next
night
or
somehow
or
x-ray
has
not
done
the
berlin
artwork.
But
I
think
those
are
both
probably
true.
C
F
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
better
than
sending
it
through
the
dev
multisig
right
yeah.
So
if
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
do
that
then
I'll,
just
okay,
how
to
do
a
new
proposal
once
that's
done.
C
Yeah,
okay,
moving
along
the
last
proposal
that
is
boosted
or
pending
both
boosting
on
mainnet,
is
a
multi-call
scheme
proposal
to
create
tokens.swapper.edu,
subdomain
and
point
it
to
the
swap
or
json
list.
I'm
not
sure
if
federico
is
on
if
he
wants
to
explain
it,
but
I
think
this
is
like
to
create
the
list
of
all
lists
almost
so.
C
This
would
be
like
a
multi-chain
token
list
that
we
can
reference
across
the
products
and
will
be
hopefully
even
used
by
other
people
as
like
as
a
token
list,
rather
than
what
we
have
now
is
is
on
each
individual
chain
would
have
its
own
token
list.
G
Yeah
yeah
right
federico
perfectly
yeah,
you've
explained
perfectly
and
yeah
I
mean
the
idea
is
to
do
this.
Also
for
omen,
and
I'm
in
I'm
talking
with
geronimo,
to
like
kind
of
coordinate
this
but
yeah.
That's
exactly
what
what's
happening.
Chris
you've
explained
it
perfectly.
C
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
really
cool
because,
as
we
go
to
multi-chain
right
and
how
tokens
are
gonna
have
like
maybe
different
addresses-
maybe
they're
not
being
able
to
reference.
This,
I
think,
is
gonna,
be
really
really
key
and
exciting.
I
think
like
that.
The
token
list
is
an
underrated
kind
of
piece
of
infrastructure.
I
think
that
deek
style
could
own
and
kind
of
support
the
our
our
multi-chain
efforts.
C
And
I
guess
they
can,
we
would
update.
How
would
I
guess
the
update
to
if
we
were
adding
new
tokens
to
last.
I
guess
in
the
previous
system
that
list
actually
lived
on
chain,
but
I
guess
in
this
one
you
would
like
make
a
pr
to
the
json
file
and
then
you
would
like
basically
update
that
there
or
how.
How
would
we
add
new
tokens
to
this
list.
G
So
there's
a
a
project
on
github,
where
you
can
add
basically
tokens
and
yeah
geronimo
is,
is-
is
working
on
it
currently
and
there's.
Basically,
those
tokens
are
divided
by
chain
for
increased
clarity.
G
It's
not
a
requirement
actually
but
and
then
there's
a
command
that
takes
all
of
these
like
per
chain
files
and
put
put
them
put
them
together
in
one
single
list,
and
once
you
have
that
list,
which
is
nothing
but
a
json
file,
you
just
upload
it
to
ipfs
and
pin
it
and
then
once
you
have
the
fbfs
hash,
you
can
go
to
alchemy
and
do
the
proposal
to
point
tokens.swapper.eth
or
tokens.omen.eth
to
that
ipfs
hash
and
that's
how
how
it's
done
so.
G
While
before
with
that,
with
the
method
we
had
before,
you
had
to
go
in
like
if
you
wanted
to
add
a
a
token
on
xdi,
for
example,
you
had
to
go
to
the
xi
base
and
do
the
proposal
there
so
and-
and
it
was
all
like
each,
as
you
said,
each
chain
had
its
own
list
in
the
in
in
a
dedicated
contract,
which
now
it's
it's
a
bit
more.
It's
a
bit
easier
to
handle
everything.
I
think
yeah.
C
C
Okay,
shifting
over
to
xdi,
I
think
nine
proposals
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
the
worker
or
contributor
proposals
are
zet
for
april
and
may
cure00
from
a
and
juden
caden
and
lnlhb.com
or
chris
pearson.
I
did
go
to
lmlhb.com
and
I
didn't
couldn't
find
out
what
that
was.
But
those
are
the
existing
contributor
proposals
out
there
now.
C
And
then
we
have
two
rep
boost,
one
for
luigi
lemon,
who
was
actually
nominated
last
month
or
this
month
for
a
community
rep
boost
he's
been
a
really
active
person
in
the
discord,
lots
of
thoughts,
and
it
had
been
participating
in
the
buy-back
discussion
a
lot
and
then
samyak,
which
is
from
the
quarterly
discord
rep
boost.
C
And
then
shifting
over
to
buyback
proposals,
so
there
are
currently
two
buyback
proposals
live
number
six
and
number.
Seven
both
have
funding
proposals
along
with
multi-call
scheme
proposals.
I
think
they
are
set
to
one
is
set
to
pass.
I
think
friday
morning
and
the
other
will
be
sunday
and
I
think
the
yeah
they've
all
been
boosted
there,
I'm
gonna,
do
it
we're
gonna,
do
a
little
discussion
on
like
the
progress
of
those
in
a
second.
C
But
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
next
proposal
or
also
in
the
multi-call
scheme
is
the
first
withdrawal
of
proposals
from
the
gnosis
protocol.
So
with
the
buyback
program
and
whenever
using
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer,
you
know,
wes
is
sent
to
this
noses
protocol,
relayer
and
then
orders
are
placed
on
those
protocol,
but
eventually
those
tokens
need
to
come
back
to
xdx
dow.
So
we
just
started
the
first
proposal
to
request
the
first
dxd
acquired
that
will
come
back
to
xdx
dow.
C
This
actually
requires
two
proposals,
one
that
is
a
request,
withdrawal
proposal
that
needs
to
have
the
token
you're
requesting
in
the
amount,
and
then
the
second
proposal
is
just
a
withdrawal
proposal
which
actually
just
sends
the
funds
back
now.
These
are
pretty
tricky
because
you
actually
need
to
execute
these
pros
back
to
back
in
the
next
batch
right.
So
the
way
notices
protocol
works
is
it
there.
It
runs
on
like
five
minute
batches,
so
the
first
proposal
needs
to
be
executed
and
then
in
the
next
five
minute
batch.
C
C
And
then
after
geeks
and
so
there's,
I
think
there's
230
the
the
current
process
for
234
dxt
to
be
requested
and
then
we'll
have
to
do
the
same
thing
for
the
web
for
orders
that
have
not
been
filled
in
excess.
C
There
then,
the
other
proposal
that
I
guess
is
not
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
that
we
just
had
an
update,
had
a
little
bit
of
a
problem
with
so
we've
been
trying
to
provision
liquidity
on
the
stake
west
pair
on
swapper
on
xdi
and
just
to
recap,
we
had
some
problems
because
we
couldn't
actually
we
couldn't
access
stake
token
from
the
alchemy
ui.
C
So
we
had
to
get
an
update
from
the
alchemy
team
to
do
that,
and
then
we
did
that
and
then
we
just
tried
with
this
first
proposal
and
for
some
reason
it's
not
recognizing
that
the
dao
has
state
tokens,
so
we'll
have
to
figure
that
out
just
see
how
we
can
get
that
liquidity
on
swapper.
D
C
Oh,
thank
you
for
yeah,
scott.
I
guess
that's
not.
I
should
have
looked
at
that
saying
the
proposal,
but
you
want
to
talk
about
that.
A
Yeah
so
yeah,
what
happens
is
once
the
proposal
goes
away
like
you
have
to.
Basically
it
doesn't
even
show
as
a
proposal
in
the
competition
scheme
on
like
the
main
propuls
like
scheme
page,
you
have
to
like
go
into
proposals
and
then,
like
click
on,
I
guess,
there's
three
proposals
that
have
ever
happened
or
three
competitions
that
have
ever
happened.
Then
you
can
go
in
and
you
can
find
it,
but
this
is
the
link
to
get
straight
to
it,
and
so
the
submission
period
ends
in
five
hours.
A
When
we
have
exactly
a
hundred
submissions
so
far,
which
is
cool,
I
don't
know
how
many
individual
people
have
entered
markets,
but
I
think
between
10
and
20
and
then
once
the
submission
period
ends
for
markets
and
for
the
context.
This
is
omen.
Omen
the
prediction
market
platform.
A
We're
basically
have
the
dow
has
a
competition
scheme
that
allows
the
dao
to
like
run
competitions
with
prizes
like
prize
amounts,
so
like
we're
using
x,
die
and
reputation
as
like
prize
pools
and
then
like
once,
the
competition
kicks
off
that
that
reputation
and
ex-die
funds
are
set
aside
and
the
competition
happens.
A
There's
a
submission
period
and
then
rep
holders
will
get
to
vote
on
their
top
10
markets
that
they
think
are
best
and
then
the
end
at
the
end
of
the
voting
period,
the
10
winners
with
the
highest
amount
of
reputation
that
are
voted
on
will
automatically
get
their
shares
of
the
prize
poll,
and
so
this
is
a
way
to
source
markets
from
the
community,
for
that
should
be
created
and
funded
on
omen,
and
so
it's
a
way
to
get
the
community
involved
yeah.
So
what
so?
A
The
key
is
once
the
voting
period
starts
like
really
rep
holders,
it's
it's
rep
holders,
responsibility
to
go
through
those
markets
and
really
think
about
which
ones,
you
think,
are
ideal
markets
for
omen,
and
you
know,
depending
on
your
preferences,
like
short
term,
some
people
think
short
term
markets
are
more
interesting.
Some
people
think,
depending
on
the
topic,
there
can
be
interesting
markets,
and
so
it's
really
up
to
rep
holders
to
on
average
decide
what
we
think
would
be
all
10
awesome
markets
to
go
on
to
omen.
Basically,.
D
D
It's
only
displaying
a
hundred,
so
I
don't
know
how
we
should
try
to
deal
with
that
if
we
could
get
it
fixed
in
time
or
or
how
we,
because
it's
about
to
end
right
and
then
five
hours,
yeah,
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
the
best
way
to
handle
it
is.
But
I
believe
there
is
an
issue
where
it's
only
displaying
like
a
hundred,
even
though
there's
more.
D
I'm
not
sure
about
that,
seeing
it
nathan
had
mentioned,
or
somebody
had
mentioned
in
the
chat
that
they
was
having
an
issue.
And
then
I
looked
at
that
the
smart
contract
and
if
you
look
at
the
transactions,
you
can
actually
count
the
number
of
transactions
on
block
scout
that
got
a
result
of
submission,
and
when
I
had
looked
it
was
more
than
100.
I
believe
so
that
it's
probably
much
higher.
Now
all.
B
Least,
more
than
120,
130
and
and
the
problem
is,
you
can't
see
the
text,
data
on
block
scouts
and
whenever
anyone
enters
a
new
submission,
it
overwrites
old
ones
on
the
front
end,
so
the
old
ones
are
lost
forever.
So
if
someone
suggested
something
a
week
ago
and
it
could
now
be
lost
and
there's
no
way
for
them
to
confirm
that
they've
submitted
it
and
they're
kind
of.
D
B
Okay,
thanks
and
just
another
thing,
I
noticed
at
the
same
time
there's
a
second
issue
and
that
every
entry
has
the
same
time
stamp
and
it's
a
really
funny
one.
It's
the
14th
of
may,
which
is
like
more
than
a
week
before
the
competition
even
started.
So
you
you,
don't
really
have
a
timestamp
stamp
of
when
each
and
every
participant
entered
they
their
market
idea
that
they
all
have
the
same.
Generic
timestamp,
which
is
some
weird.
C
Date,
yeah
I
mean
so.
It
sounds
like
we
want
to
make
sure
that
running
this
competition.
We
have
no
problems
with
like
voting
and
submitting,
but
if
there
are
people
that
submitted
and
did
not
get
their
proposals
like
counted,
we
may
think
about
trying
to
have
something
to
at
least
account.
For
that.
I
don't
know.
If
that's
like
you
know,
five
5x
died
to
people
that
weren't
able
to
enter
that
or
just
being
able
to
track
the
at
some
point,
be
able
to
track.
C
B
Yeah
and
and
lastly,
to
to
add
to
all
of
the
complexity,
when
someone
adds
a
new
one
and
when
it
overrides
an
old
one,
it
doesn't
overwrite
the
the
oldest
one.
They
somehow
get
ordered
on
the
front
end
based
on
the
alphabet.
Somehow
so
it's
it,
the
newest
one
doesn't
overwrite
the
oldest
one.
So
you
you
can
still
have
the
oldest
one
within
the
100,
but
some
random
one
gets
overwritten
and
and
gets
lost.
So
it's
it's
really
messy.
A
C
C
Cool
all
right,
so
just
moving
ahead.
I
wanted
to
carve
out
some
time
to
talk
about
the
buyback
and
get
people's
thoughts
on
where
we're
at.
So
let
me
share
my
screen
here,
so
this
spreadsheet
is
meant
to
just
give
a
summary
of
the
proposals
that
have
passed.
This
is
on
xdi
right
now,
so
there
have
been
five
dxd
buyback
proposals
that
have
been
executed.
You
can
see
the
amounts
on
the
purchases
there
and
then
also
the
the
the
price
on
the
the
limit
order.
C
Of
course,
the
limit
order
itself
is
determined
by
it's:
a
2.5
percent
above
the
swapper
dxd
weft
pool
at
the
time
of
execution
or
just
really
when
the
oracle
contract
is
called,
and
so
you
can
see,
we
filled
two
orders
completely.
This
was
the
first
one
that
was
passed
by
majority
vote
and
then
buyback
number
three
was
filled
completely.
It
actually
sat
there
for
a
couple
days,
but
that
was
filled
completely
and
then
buyback
number
two
was
filled.
C
I
think
it
was
yeah
12
here
and
that
order
is
actually
expired,
so
that
left
is
in
nose's
protocol
and
needs
to
be
returned
to
xdx
style
and
then
buyback
number
four
and
five
are
currently
live
on
notes
protocol
now
and
just
to
kind
of
put
some
the
numbers
on
this
right.
So
there's
a
the
current
order
for
the
0.1181
order.
The
current
price
on
swapper
right
now
is
0.111,
so
there
is
a
like
a
arbitrage
opportunity.
How
big
that
opportunity
is.
C
Is
there
so
that's
where
we
are
now
in
terms
of
what's
been
acquired
so
that
in
total
that's
there's
been
235
dxd
acquired,
which
is
like
seventy
one
thousand
dollars.
So
the
program
was
up
to
a
million
dollars,
so
we
still
have
a
bit
of
ways
to
go,
but
this
is
the
235
and
I
this
was
the
amount
that
was
requested
in
the
withdrawal
proposal
that
was
just
submitted
this
morning
in
terms
of
volume.
So
I
think
one
of
the
things
like
how
big
are
the
the
trades.
C
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
has
surprised
me
is
that
the
volume
has
not
picked
up.
It's
actually
declined,
and
so
I've
been
tracking
the
dt
hunching
volume
in
a
spreadsheet
and
it's
yeah,
so
I
have
the
seven
day,
trailing
average
that
just
takes
the
average
of
each
the
last
seven
days,
as
you
can
see
here
over
the
last
six
months
and
I've
spread
it
out
across
the
the
five
big
on
chain
pools
the
uniswap
one,
the
balancer
80
20,
the
balancer
5050
swapper
mainnet
and
swapper
xdi.
C
Of
course,
you
can
see
how
swapper
x
die
is
really
taking
a
larger
percentage
of
volume
here,
but
still
we're
not
at
we're
still
below
a
lot
of
the
levels
that
we
were
seeing
even
in
the
beginning
of
the
year.
This
is
the
last
three
months
here,
just
a
little
bit
more
focus
on
this,
since
you
can
see
the
average.
As
I
said
it's
been
about
like
a
little
under
unchained.
C
I
think
it's
like
115
000
over
the
last
three
months
and
then,
if
you
look
here
the
last,
this
is
the
last
month,
and
I
think
kind
of
the
most
interesting
thing
to
me
is
really
like
the
last
10
days
and
if
you've
been
looking
at
the
unchained
volume
for
gxt,
it's
actually
declined
a
bit
the
last
week.
Because
of
that-
and
so
this
is
preventing
us-
I
would
say
from
increasing
the
size
of
the
orders,
because
the
the
on-chain
volume
really
is
not
there.
C
And
then
this
is
also
having
effect,
I
think,
on
the
ability
to
arbitrage
the
orders
themselves.
So
just
a
kind
of
couple
points
to
talk
about
right,
so
the
status
right
now
we're
70
000
dollars
of
of
1
million
gxt
acquired.
Is
this
like
an
arbitrage
opportunity
right
or
are
we
trying
to
create
a
price
floor
in
the
current
buy-back
proposal?
C
The
2.5
slippage
is,
is
required
for
for
all
of
the
orders
and
that
limits
the
the
arbitrage
opportunity
and
then
there's
also
the
concern
about
the
liquidity
depth
on
swapper
itself
and
how
you
know,
because
there's
not
very
much
there's
not
as
much
liquidity
on
swapper.
You
can't
really
go
in
and
buy
the
dxd
from
the
swapper
pool
and
sell
on
gnosis
protocol,
because
buying
on
the
swapper
pool
will
very
quickly
move
the
price.
C
So
the
liquidity
depth
is
is
a
little
bit
of
concern
there
and
then,
as
I
said,
dxd
volume
has
not
really
increased
that
much
over
the
last
week
or
two
and
then
kind
of.
Lastly,
this
brings
up
to
the
question
of
like
using
gnosis
protocol
v1.
You
know.
Obviously
I
think
it
is
harder
to
sell
into
these
orders.
C
We
created
a
guide
to
try
to
have
people
be
able
to
access
this
from
mesa,
but
I
think
it
obviously
most
the
volume
is
still
on
swapper,
uniswapping
and
elsewhere,
and
that's
where
most
of
the
trades
are
there.
So
do
we
want
to
continue
using
gnosis
protocol
v1
and
then
just
for
another.
C
Like
kick
off
this
question,
there
was
a
post
from
from
the
rf
new
here
that
kind
of
had
so
should
we
be
putting
goals
forward
for
what
were
what
we're
trying
to
do
in
terms
of
of
the
buyback
basically
like
do
we.
C
X
amount
of
dxt
by
this
or
does
the
price
of
dxd
want
to
be
something,
and
should
we
should
we
kind
of
commit
to
those
so
yeah?
That's
just
what
I
thought.
I
wanted
to
open
the
floor
for
thoughts
or
discussions
on
on
buyback.
H
Yeah,
I'm
curious
why
you
think
the
trading
volume
should
increase
like
the
way
I
felt
about
that
is
that
we
actually
taking
dxd
out
of
the
market
and
I'm
not
sure
if
that
should
increase,
like
trading
volume.
C
The
only
reason
I
was
thinking
would
increase
trading
volume
is
purely
just
like
the
arbitrage
opportunity
right
like
right.
Now
I
don't
know
what
the
gas
prices
are
but,
like
you
could
theoretically
buy
dxd
on
all
of
the
pools.
Balancers
balancer,
80,
20,
balancer,
5050
unit
swap
swapper
and
swapper
x
die,
buy
a
little
bit
of
that
and
then
go
sell
it
on
notice
protocol,
and
I
just
assumed
that
that,
like
arbitrage
opportunity
would
lead
to
more
activity
on
those
other
pools,
but
I
it
really
hasn't.
C
I
think
that
maybe
is
maybe
the
arbitrage
opportunity
isn't
that
much.
But
I
I
was
expecting
the
like,
almost
like
the
volume
to
ripple
through
other
pools,
but
but
it
hasn't,
it
hasn't
yet.
H
Yeah,
so,
as
far
as
I
see
it,
we
we're
actually
like
creating
floors,
which
is
also
a
nice
result
of
the
of
the
buyback
every
time
each
kind
of
dipped,
dxd
price
dipped.
I
think
we
are
correlated
to
ether
and
every
time
this
happened.
I
think
those
limit
orders
have
been
filled
because
they
were
just
opportunities
and
to
rf
noobs.
H
Like
point,
I'm
not
sure.
If
we
need
goals,
I
think,
having
like
two
orders
filled
already,
is
a
success
for
me.
Seeing
that
I
think
three
two
out
of
three
have
been
filled
completely
already,
so
I
think
it's
it's.
It's
work.
It's
working,
nice.
D
I'd
add
on
the
the
nurses
protocol
re-layer,
so
I
mean
gnosis
is
intending
to
sunset
that
product,
so
we
are
actually
going
to
be
forced
at
some
point
to
not
be
using
that
and
to
use
something
else,
and
I've
been
previously
mentioned
this
idea
of
building
a
relayer
that
would
buy
directly
on
swapper,
and
I
actually
had
a
a
call
with
niko
about
that
just
yesterday
and
he's
actually
looking
into
that
now.
So
hopefully
that
will
be
another
option
that
big
style
has
in
the
near,
not
consistent
future.
D
You
know,
I
think,
once
we,
if
you
want
to
work,
how
that
would
work,
I
think
it
would
need
a
certain
amount
of
liquidity
on
swapper
or
that
could
be
a
viable
approach
and
then
just
another
comment
on
the
on
the
floor
versus
I
mean
the
way
I've
understood
this
buyback
is,
you
know,
especially
with
the
framing
of
a
million
dollar
buyback,
is
that
the
intent
is
not
really
to
put
a
floor,
but
rather
to
complete
the
buyback.
H
But
this
means
we
need
to
increa
like
the
simplest
way
to
like
actually
get
the
gold
done,
which
was
ratified
by
the
dxo
one
million
usd
in
dxd.
We
should
just
increase
the
premium
and
then
execute
like
yeah.
I
J
So
if
I
can
say
something
so
with
my
post,
I
meant
to
clarify
exactly
the
goal,
for
example
in
the
chat
now
venki
is
writing
that
the
goal
should
be
to
mac
to
buy
the
maximum
amount
of
txd
for
one
million
and
nathan
says
that
instead
the
ratio
should
increase,
so
the
two
are
not
the
same
thing
right.
So,
for
example,
if
our
goal
is
just
to
buy
as
many
dxd
as
possible
for
one
million,
a
very
slow
procedure
that
can
take
one
year
is
is
just
fine
right
like
it's
it's
going
on
right
now.
J
Well,
maybe
it's
not
working
right
now
so
yeah,
my
post
was
basically
just
to
to
clarify
the
goals
and
to
discuss
them
yeah
together,
as
you
are
doing
greatly
in
this
goal,.
C
Yeah,
I
think
to
me
the
goal
is
to
demonstrate
dx,
dow
and
rep
holder's
commitment
to
dxt
as
a
core
part
of
its
financial
value,
and
I
think
that
comes
from
kind
of
demonstrating
the
I
mean
that's,
why
kind
of
buying
dxd
is
a
way
of
instilling
confidence
in
dxd
in
the
market
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways.
I
guess
to
do
that,
but
to
me
like
the
goal
is
really
is:
is
kind
of
making
dxd
showing
rep
holders
and
deke
styles
commitment
to
dxd.
C
One
question
so
I
think
that
I'm
not
entirely
sure
so.
We've
got
235
dxd
right
now.
That
is
worth
like
72
000
right
now,
but
we
don't
actually
have
an
easy
way
of
calculating
the
dollar
amount
of
that
right.
So
is
the
dollar
amount
of
that
determined
by
when
the?
What,
when
the
wealth
was
sent
to
the
relayer,
is
the
dollar
amount
determined
by
that
by
when
the
actual
order
was
completed?
C
C
It's
also
very
difficult
to
find
out
when
orders
are
like
confirmed
on
gnosis
protocol,
so
I
like
it,
it's
really
hard.
I
was
trying
to
actually
figure
out
this
to
be
able
to
do
it
at
the
time
of
the
trade
complete,
but
it's
a
little
bit
tricky
for
that.
D
Yeah-
and
I
think
this
issue
that
you
know
the
slippage
of
2.5
is
not
enough-
the
fact
that
we're
seeing
that
on
next
night,
it's
only
going
to
be
worse
on
the
net
due
to
the
gas
costs,
especially
with
this
protocol
being
expensive
and
the
liquidity
still
being
thin
and
spread
out
across
multiple
exchanges.
You
know
it's
going
to
require
a
decent
amount
of
gas
costs
to
move
the
requisite
txt,
which
I
think
is.
D
Is
you
know,
besides
the
fact
that
this
protocol
is
going
to
be
sunset,
I
think
that's
another
argument
to
move
forward
with
direct
buying
them
and
swapper.
That
would
not
be.
C
D
H
Yeah
I
I
would
still
like
finish
up
the
one
million
dollar
buyback
and
then
push,
I
think,
push
the
whole
like
the
whole
dxd
into
swapper
on
extine
or
mainnet.
That's
up
to
the
discussion,
and
then
we
could
actually
continue
with
like
market
buys
through
swapper
pools.
D
Yeah
and
there's
already
like
plans
right
for
farms,
so
I
think
it
actually
goes
hand
in
hand
with
that
like
if
that
rolls
out
kind
of
has
been,
as
has
been
described
so
far.
I
don't
know
if
we
have
actual
if
it's
actually
passed
anything
yet,
but
you
know
if
the
liquidity
gets
deeper,
then
I
think
the
market
might.
C
Start
to
make
a
lot
more
sense
and
the
liquidity
on
swapper
and
both
mainnet
and
xda
has
actually
gotten
deeper
over
the
last
two
weeks,
like
there's,
just
been
a
little
kind
of
slow
trickle
of
liquidity
for
dxd,
specifically
flowing
into
swapper,
and
I
think
that's
like
a
a
good
thing
and
we
could
encourage
it
more
yeah.
I
feel
like
we're
kind
of
in
like
building
to
something
where,
in
two
weeks
three
weeks,
the
ability
to
execute
trades
orders
on
swapper
will
be
there,
because
the
liquidity
itself
will
kind
of
be
there.
C
So
that's
actually,
I
think
the
next
we
can
go
back
to
the
buyback
as
we
talked
about
this.
But
just
the
next
discussion
item
is
that
you
know
the
launch
farming
camp
for
swapper
beta
launch.
So
obviously
I
think
these
the
campaign
won't
launch
until
swapper
beta
launches,
so
we're
still
waiting.
C
I
think
on
the
proposal
to
update
the
ens
on
that,
but
the
only
thing
that
would
be
needed
for
the
xti
campaigns
is
the
actual
dxd,
and
that's
why
the
the
dxd
withdrawal
proposal
that
was
just
that
will
pass
on
on
monday
is
important
to
that.
So
I
think
that
this
could
be
yeah.
I
feel
like
this
farming
campaign
that
we've
kind
of
agreed
on
the
overall
structure,
at
least
on
xda.
C
Could
the
proposal
would
come
in
any
day
now
if
we
wanted
to
even
if
we
could,
even
we
don't
have
to
wait
for
that
withdrawal
proposal
to
pass.
We
could
even
do
it
before,
assuming
that
the
dxd
will
be
there
when
it
when
it
goes.
But
I
think
we
should
probably
look
to
send
that
proposal
like
a
day
or
two
after
the
swapper
ens
proposal
goes
and
just
for
the
reference,
the
kind
of
plan
that
we
seem
to
be-
and
this
is
for
xdi.
C
I
think
mainnet
will
take
a
little
bit
more
time
because
the
proposal,
but
how
would
people
think
about
moving
forward
with
at
least
the
xdi
campaigns
outlined
here
with
the
proposal
in
the
next
couple
days,
assuming
the
the
beta
release
of
swapper.
C
D
Hedgehog's
perspective,
like
the
goal
of
the
buyback,
is
to
acquire
as
much
dxd
as
lower
price
as
possible,
and
so
the
point
they
were
making
was
you
don't
want
to
incentivize
like
well,
he
they
were
saying
that's
one
thing
and
then
not
to
incentivize
too
much
liquidity
because
the
prices
are
low.
D
But
I
think
that
I
want
to
like
revisit
that
conversation
with
headshot,
because,
like
being
able
to
do
the
buyback
at
these
prices
is
like
kind
of
enabling
his
initial
point
right.
So
I
think.
C
If
we,
I
think
following
his
perspective-
and
I
think
it's
really
like
how
would
the
dow
basically
dx
dow
maximize
value
purely
on
that
and
for
that
it
would
be
like
you
said,
acquiring
gxd
at
the
lowest
prices,
but
that
is
kind
of,
I
think,
that's
the
model
that
we're,
maybe
not
as
happy
with
because
of
how
slow
it's
taking
right,
because
it's
like
oh
we're,
providing
support
to
dxd
and
just
acquiring
it
at
the
lowest
possible
price,
and
then
eventually
that
will
push
up
the
price
and
that
will
probably
be
the
most
optimal
way
to
acquire
the
most
dxd.
C
But
that's
probably
not
the
quickest
way
to
do
it,
and
you
know,
I
think
we
have
lots
of
other
priorities,
specifically,
I
think
with
swapper
farming
campaigns.
And
so
how
can
we,
I
think,
the
priority
of
moving
this
more
quickly,
maybe
supersedes
the
desire
to
maximize
the
value
extraction
out
of
the
buyback
itself.
B
I
I
had
an
extensive
chat
on
discord
with
hedgehog
about
a
week
ago,
and
he
kind
of
like
wants
the
best
of
both
worlds,
which
is
impossible.
He
kind
of
wants
to
eat
his
cake
and
have
it
too.
B
I
believe
the
best
approach
would
be
something
the
rf
noob
pointed
at
about
a
month
ago
in
a
dell
talk
post,
basically.
B
We
should
not
care
about
how
much
we
spend
on
buying
it
and
we
should
increase
the
price
at
which
we're
buying
it
so
that
it
drives
demand
for
people
to
buy
dxd
on
the
market
and
arbit
to
sell
it
to
us
until
it
reaches
the
until
the
market
price
reaches
the
the
price
point
at
which
we're
buying
it,
and
we
can
set
it
as
high
as
we
want.
We
could.
B
We
could
start
buying
it
at
a
thousand,
but
dxd
and
people
will
rush
to
the
market
to
start
buying
it
and
sell
it
to
us,
and
this
will
actually
even
the
price
and
we
will
lose
money
short
term,
but
this
will
be
the
most
effective
strategy
so
and
if,
if
our
aim
is
to
increase
the
ratio
of
dxd
to
eth,
this
is
this
should
be
the
way
to
go,
because
if
we
aim
at
buying
it
as
cheap
as
possible,
then
we
we're
not
achieving
the
goal.
The
the
main
goal
is
like
we're
doing
the
opposite.
A
A
I'm
not
sure
that
if
we
bought
at
0.2
eth
that
that
would
any
more
effectively
increase
the
price
to
point
to
eth,
then
then
buying
at
current
market
price
and
continually
buying
at
current
market
price.
At
whatever
then
current
market
price
is
until
we
get
to
point
to
eat,
you'll
just
end
up
at
0.2
eth,
but
you'll
have
gotten
a
shitload
more
dxd
if
you
start
buying
at
current
market
price
and
then
keep
buying
that
current
market
price.
A
H
Yeah
exactly
it's
just
a
disadvantage
like
it's
a
path
where
we
we
don't
actually
need
to
go
because
it
like
three
limit
orders.
Two
of
them
has
been
filled
completely.
I
don't
think
anyone
is
selling
and
I
I
would
say
the
price
is
already
increasing,
because
no
one
is
selling
and
as
at
least
at
least
like
the
smart
dxd
holders,
who
kind
of
know
that
we
actually
like
calmly
buying
back
stuff,
they
don't
want
to
sell
because
then
they
know
there's
like
a
ton
ton
of
buybacks
still
coming.
H
So
I
I
would
still
continue
with
like
the
com
limit
order,
buyback
we
are
doing
now,
but
just
like
increase
the
premium
just
to
get
to
push
it
a
little
bit
more.
C
Like
a
proposal
right,
we
need
to
do
another
signal
proposal
to
try
to
try
to
do
this.
One
increase
the
the
premium
in
in
some
way
to
authorize
swapper
to
be
a
venue
for
trade
execution
right,
so
we'll
need
to
relay
for
for
that,
and
then
three
is
build
up.
The
liquidity
in
the
dxt
west
pool
on
swapper
through,
like
the
farming
campaign,
and
I
think,
like
all
of
those
together
kind
of
move
us
into
that
direction
of
like
increasing
the
arbitrage
opportunity,
increasing
the
daily
volume.
C
So
we
can
increase
the
buys
and
kind
of
keep
maintaining
the
the
pace
there
and
then
I
think
in
in
two
weeks,
we'll
we'll
see
what
maybe,
in
a
different
place.
D
C
Interested
for
input
but
cool
all
right.
Well,
we'll
try
to
get
a
forum
post
up
about
this,
and
maybe
like
get
a
single
proposal
up
about
this
too,
but
in
the
meantime,
we'll
continue
with
the
the
buyback
program
as
it
is
and
there's
a
huge,
oh,
not
a
huge,
there's,
an
arbitrage
opportunity
right
now,
so
those
of
you
paying
attention
at
home
and
also
it's
like
a
way
of
instilling
confidence.
If
someone
buys
dxd
right
now,
they
should
know
that
someone
is
going
to
buy.
C
That
is
going
to
put
a
buy
order
at
a
higher
price
like
in
a
day
or
in
two
days
right
and
like
that,
should
give
you
confidence
in
in
buying
dxd,
because
you
know
you're
going
to
have
liquidity
cool
two
items.
I
just
wanted
to
go
over
quickly
before
we
get
to
dx
vote
augusto
one
and
one
is
the
mainnet
rep
sync
check-in
proposal
for
sinking
candy
fork.
Rep
is
on
the
is
in
mainnet
for
a
queue.
I
think
others
should
follow
suit.
C
I
think
it's
important
to
get
net
rep
claims
so
encourage
others
to
do
the
same.
You
can
use
that
one
as
a
model.
Second,
I've
noticed
that
the
gen
balance
in
xd,
xdao
and
even
like
dx
tau,
is
not
super.
C
I
think
we
have,
which
is
in
xdx,
dow
6500
gen
in
xdx,
dow
and
57
000
in
dx
style,
just
wondering
if
we
could
do
like
a
member
balancer
here
to
do
this
or
do
we
need
to
actually
like
maybe
have
someone
acquire
more
gen
for
dx
dow,
something
to
think
about
and
monitor.
C
Which
leads
us
to
dx
vote
because
in
the
future
we
maybe
won't
be
needing
the
general
because
we'll
be
using
dxt
with
with
with
dx
vote
so
gusto.
Do
you
want
to
give
us
an
update,
and
maybe
like
kind
of
paint,
a
little
bit
more
of
a
broader
picture
with
shannon
veronica
on.
F
F
So
this
is
for
general
averika.
This
was
our
main
need.
We
wanted
a
secure
way
to
execute
kind
of
flexible
actions
on
the
on
the
governance
level.
This
is
super
important
because
it
doesn't
matter
if
you
have
a
very
good
reputation
distribution
if
the
dao
is
not
able
to
execute
how
the.
How
can
I
put
a
flexibility
in
a
secure
in
a
secure
way?
This
this
method?
F
So
this
is
what
we,
what
I've
been
working
on
a
lot
based
on
all
our
reasons
on
base
elm,
privately
using
alchemy
from
dao
stack
this
the
way
it
works.
It
fetch
all
the
information
from
from
the
from
the
network
that
you
select,
that
you
want
to
use
right
now,
it's
being
deployed
on
rink
by
xi
and
and
arab
into
testnet.
F
So,
every
time
that
you
change
the
network
is
going
to
fetch
all
the
information
from
the
from
the
network.
You
added-
and
it's
going
to
put
you
in
the
browser
in
the
local
browser
that
you're
using
that
in
your
you
know
your
local
information
and
you're
going
to
be
able
to
navigate
through
all
the
static
information
that
is
on
there
that
it's
like
internally
here
on
on
your
computer.
F
So
you
don't
need
to
call
the
graph
for
any
or
any
centralized
service
it
just
fetches,
all
the
information
active
from
the
blockchain,
so
it's
100
decentralized,
its
way
and
all
the
information
that
you
upload.
Like
all
the
proposal,
descriptions
that
is
like
dynamic
contact
is
applied
to
ipfs
and
the
rest
is
on
the
blockchain
itself.
F
So
I
wanted
to
show
it
this
around
what
we
agreed
on,
that
it
was
going
to
be
the
1.0.
Microsoft
was
all
these
issues.
I
think
it
was
like
a
month
or
a
month
and
a
half
ago,
so
most
of
these
were
fixed
on
this
pull
request.
F
F
F
It
will
be
very
good
if
other
the
excess
from
the
governance
squad.
I
can't
review
that
these
issues
were
fixed,
because
this
is
related
to
my
payment
that
I
agreed
on
my
contribution
reward
that
I
was
going
to
work
on
those
issues
in
order
to
get
paid
and
guess
the
1.0
milestone.
I
guess
we
are
not
in
the
1.0,
yet
there
are
a
lot.
There
are
no
other
things,
but
few
things
that
I
would
like
to
fix
and
improve
like
even
more,
for
example,
the.
F
How
do
you?
How
do
you
go
to
the
action
that
we
are
executing
on
the
network
from,
for
example,
to
exit?
You
click
on
a
proposal,
and
you
see
the
proposal,
you
click
on
an
action
and
you
go
to
the
transaction
on
the
block
explorer
and
maybe
show
a
bit
more
information
in
a
nicer
way
so
to
get
this
1.0.
F
If
we
want
to
call
it
beta
version
or
something
like
that
or
developer
version
finish,
and
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
start
using
it
on
exact
and
arbitrary
important
thing,
it
was
already
deployed
on
arbitron.
It
is
deployed,
the
contracts
are
there,
but
we
cannot
use
it
yet
because
they
have
a
white
list
of
addresses.
F
Maybe
we
can
set
up
another
call
to
finalize,
and
I
know
decide
on
smaller
issues
or
things
that
we
want
to
fix
before
start
using
it
like
more
publicly
around
publicly
like
internally,
between
the
borders
before
sharing
publicly,
because
I
think
is
far
it's
far
from
being
a
public
maintenance
product
yet
visa,
even
though
it
works,
it
will
be
great
to
fix
and
make
it
look
a
bit
better
and
more
usable
and
easy
to
navigate
because
everything
works,
but
well,
for
example,
if
you
go
here
to
to
thou,
you
say
this
is
not
nice
right.
F
We
want
to
deploy,
we
want
to
show,
maybe
the
I
mean
we
want
to
show
the
information
a
bit
nicer.
There
is
a
lot
of
information
that
here
we
are
not
using.
For
example,
we
have
all
the
addresses
and
the
reputation
that
that
is
distributed
among
the
users
here
locally.
So
I
can't
I
can
show
him
a
pie
chart
of
all
the
reputation
distribution.
F
I
can
show
how
many
proposals
every
other
every
address
created.
How
many
votes
did
they
do
so
we
can
have
a
ranking
of
who
voted
most.
Who
voted,
who
had
more
balls
against
proposals
like
there
is
a
lot
of
information
here
that
we
can
show
it?
It
will
be
awesome
to
yeah
to
show
you
because
it's
not
available
on
alchemy,
and
I
think
it's
very
interesting
to
see
okay,
which
was
the
who
the
who
created
more
proposals
who
voted
the
most,
who
voted
on
most
proposals
whose
take
more
dxe.
F
F
So
this
is
the
current
status.
We
are
going
to
be
reviewing
it
the
issues,
I
guess
with
the
governance
squad
nah.
That
would
be,
I
think
chris
maybe
skye.
F
Maybe
john,
so
take
a
look
at
them
and
we
can
decide
what
or
what
changes
do
we
want
to
do
next?
The
when
I
share
it
yesterday
on
the
development
call
well
one
of
the
main
things
that
that
a
few
developers
say
that
that
they
would
like
to
cease
to
look
more
like
what's
the
name
of
this
stuff,
yeah
more
like
a
snap
yeah.
So
that's
what
so
yeah
yeah
we
can
make
it
look
more
like
a
snapshot.
F
The
thing
is
that
it's
a
very
the
way
it
works
next
to
snapchat
it's
different,
but
we
can
give
it
a
look
alike.
A
snapshot
later.
I
guess
the
main
thing
here
is
that
we
want
to
test
that
it
works
that
the
technicalities
here
work
it
doesn't.
We
want
to
give
it.
F
We
want
to
make
it
as
less
technical
as
possible,
but
the
important
thing
is
that
it's
usable,
for
example
right
now,
we
can
execute
any
call
from
the
from
the
avatar,
because
we
just
you
just
need
to
encode
the
information
encode
it
and
propose
it,
which
is,
of
course,
technical.
But
that
is
not
a
possibility
right
now
on
on
archimede
right,
you
need
to
you
need
to
create
a
new
scheme
or
deploy
a
multi
call
here.
F
If
you
want
to
interact
with
any
new
contract,
it
will
be
just
us
allowing
we
want
to
add
a
permission
on
to
call
this
contract
and
later
you
can
execute
this
call
and
that's
it.
We
won't
be
need
to
creating
to
be
creating
a
cheat
on
of
multiple
schemes
to
do
multiple
actions.
We
regret
to
control
the
permissions
from
one
scheme
or
from
one
yeah
from
one
scheme
at
the
time,
so
yeah.
F
That's
that
thing
I
think
I
think
we
are
good.
We
execute
a
proposal
that
execute
the
main
three
actions.
There
is
sending
ether
dxe
a
minting
reputation,
it
consumed
400
southern
of
gas,
which
is
at
the
cost.
F
Today
you
may
need
near
a
hundred
dollars
with
the
gas
cost
right
now,
if
you
want
to
send
ether,
dxe
a
mean
repetition,
three
actions,
so
I
think
it's
quite
good,
so
I
guess
we'll
be
talking
with
the
governor
squad
to
get
it
finished
and
to
start
using
it
on
arbitrary,
mannequin
and
green
kevin
and
playing
it
around
as
soon
as
we.
C
C
But
it's
very
it's
pretty
easy,
now
pretty
easy
for
us
to
just
take
the
prior
reputation
list
and
to
support
that
over
to
the
new
chain,
so
the
dows
on
all
these
chains
basically
have
the
same
stakeholders
that
are
like
the
same
thing.
So
this
is
a
kind
of
exciting
thing,
especially
as
we
roll
up
to
arbor
trim
now
and
entering
our
third
network
that
we
will
have
a
base
on
yeah
and
then
yeah.
H
Yeah,
obviously
like
one
one
thing
like,
I
think
we
should
try
to
get
on
par
with
alchemy
functionality
like
there
are
people
who
who
just
know
how
to
create
proposals
like
funding
proposals.
So
I
think
I
think
that
is
something
I
already
said
yesterday
in
the
developer
developer.
Call,
I
think,
creating
a
proposal
shouldn't
shouldn't
mean
to
share
like
content,
hashes
and
like
that,
but
rather
very
exactly
like
alchemy,
just
fill
up
the
the
forum
press,
the
button
and
the
proposal
should
should
be
created.
H
So
I
would
love
to
see
like
prioritization
on
getting
like
ceramic.network
included,
to
make
sure
that
we
get
those
like
proposal.
Information
are
stored
on
ipfs
automatically.
F
Yeah
well,
there
is
an
issue.
There
is
an
issue
because
I've
been
exploring
around
and
there
is
no
way
for
us
of
a
doubt
to
ensure
the
persistency
of
information
on
the
distributed
network
like
ipfs.
F
This
means
there
is
no
way
that
the
dow
can
ensure
that
okay,
any
content
that
you
upload
here,
we
know
we
can
pay
be.
We
can
pay
for
its
persistency.
The
quickest
way
that
we
can
fix
is
I
create
like
a
bot
or
a
small,
a
script
bot
that
is
going
to
listen.
Every
time
a
proportion
is
created,
I'm
going
to
pin
it
myself.
That
is
not
ideal.
There
is
something
that
we
want
to
move
from.
That
is
one
that
want
to
distantiate
ourselves.
F
This
is
how
alchemy
was
working,
so
we
will
have
to
find
a
way
on
it.
It
can
work
for
now
right.
We
can
add
that
we
can
have
a
bot
that
is
going
to
be
everything,
but
I
I
guess
it's
going
to
be
very
important
for
us
to
encourage
the
community
to
own
the
information
that
they
that
they
are
applying
and
start
belonging,
somehow
or
being
part
of
at
least
a
minimum
technical
level,
because
creating
an
an
api
key
in
pinata
is
just
two
minutes.
H
I
mean
a
simple
solution
would
be
to
create
a
depth
note
package
and
all
like
that
note.
People
who
have
a
depth
note
at
home
could
just
like
run
the
package
and
then
make
sure
that
the
content,
the
content,
is
pinned.
F
Yeah
yeah,
if
that
means
that
I'm
not
passionate
yeah,
yes,
yeah,
that
that
can
be
our
solution,
definitely
going
to
look
into
that.
C
Awesome
yeah,
which
I
think
the
problem
with
our
view
are
weave,
is
it
doesn't
have
integration
with
ens
veronica
that
we,
because
we
run
out
like
we
host
the
the
products
and
the
websites
are
all
like
through
the
ens
system,
and
I
don't
think,
there's
a
way
to
have
or
we've
connected
that
ens.
Yet.
A
When
we
are
doing
we
are
employing
our
website,
we
can
use
our
weave
in
a
manner
that
we
use.
Ipfs
right,
like
ems,
is
not
connected
right.
I
was
actually
talking
with
one
of
the
founders
like
there's
some
interesting
people
in
miami
at
bitcoin
week,
but
I
was
talking
to
one
of
the
founders
of
sia
or
saya
or
sia,
and
they
had
this.
A
Yeah
this
time
you
know
like
the
skynet
and
in
it
you
know
they
were
selling
the
reasons
why
it's
like,
even
better
than
are
we
even
and
better
than
ipfs.
So
it's
worth
exploring.
Well,
you
kind
of
need
a
few
people
I
think
to
like
do
stuff
for,
on
behalf
of
dx
dow
to
like
get
it
going,
but
because
you
gotta
like
pay
on
a
regular
basis.
I
think,
but
it's
another
possibility.
We
could
look
into
because.
D
Was
it
david
vorik?
I
actually
had
a
conversation
with
him
about
potentially
replacing
yeah
like
ipfs
with
skynet,
but
I
think
what
was
missing
currently
is
that,
like
we
need
some
way
for
the
content
hash
to
actually
like
resolve
to
the
like.
If
we
set
the
content
dash
in
ens,
we
need
a
way
for
somebody
to
visit
like
a
site
and
like
resolve
that
content
hash
stored
on
skynet
and
the
last.
I
checked
that
wasn't
like
currently
enabled,
but
it's
definitely
a
good
conversation
to
have
and
see
if
we.
F
F
So
later
you
decode
the
the
ens
contemplation,
and
you
know
if
it
is
ipfs
or
swan
protocol
and
that's
and
those
are
the
only
two
protocols
that
they
that
I
think
they
support
the
reason
yeah
there
is
an
ethereum
improvement
proportion
and
eip
about
that.
I
guess
you
can
add
other
protocols,
but
I
don't
know
if
they
are
widely
supported.
H
Right
as
long
as
there
is
no
way
to
resolve
those
like
competitor
content,
there
is
no
like
we
shouldn't
actually
talk
about
it
right.
It
doesn't
make
sense
for
us
like
we
can.
We
shouldn't
go
back
and
have
like
a
worse
experience
for
our
users.
B
I
C
I
think
it's
it's
actually
more
than
a
bounty
like
this
is
we
should
be
investing
in
projects
that
are
like
building
this,
because,
like
no
literally
like
no
one
else,
has
the
needs
that
deke
style
has
in
this
area,
so
like
no
one
is
going
to
build
like
someone
would
build
this
product
like
these
products
like
for
us.
First
yeah.
D
If
it,
if
it
is
somebody
like
science
right
like
building
it
like,
whatever
the
incentive,
is
that
they
would
need
to
actually
prioritize
it
and
build.
H
It,
and
that
might
be.
C
I
think
this
is
like
the
grant.
I
think
we
should
like
figure
out
how
to
like,
put
out
like
an
open
call
for
a
grant
in
this
and
figure
out
specifically
what
it
is,
whether
it's
just
like
serving
yeah.
I
don't
know
what
it
would
be,
but
there
would
be.
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
fund
some
research
or
development.
F
F
I
mean
we
have
plenty
of
it,
so
we
need
to
pay
for
it,
but
there
is
no
way
I
mean
there
is
no
way
for
any
for
any
address
for
anything
new
matters
to
say:
okay,
we
pay
anyone
who
is
pinning
this
content,
the
only
project
that
I
know
that
I
know
that
was
working
on
that
was
this
one
client,
I
think
now
it's
called
the
big
client
where
they
were
designing
a
payment
protocol
where
you
were
able
to
pay
for
the
persistency
of
certain
hashes
on
the
soil
network.
F
That
would
be
awesome,
because
if
we
know
that
okay,
this
is
our
these
are.
These
are
the
hashes
that
we
need
to
pay
and
we
have
the
moon
chain.
We
can
later
pay
for
them,
but
there
is
that
solution
is.
Is
it's
far
away?
I
don't
know
if
it
continued,
but
that's
something
that
first
we
need
to
figure
out
how
we
can
enforce
the
the
persistency
of
the
content
ourselves.
F
Yeah.
We
have
a
lot
of
people.
We
can.
We
can
find
out
many
ways
to
eat,
like
her
only
moon
said
we
can
integrate
ourselves.
With
that
note,
that
would
be
awesome
and
later
we
I
later
I
can
run
a
script
or
a
what
that
is
going
to
be
in
the
services
and
we
can
have
the
option
on
the
expo
to
pin.
If
you
have
your,
I,
your
pinata
api
key
to
pin
all
the
ipfs
hashes
from
the
excel
that
it
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
be
proposals.
F
It
can
be
documents
right,
it
can
be
our
apps.
There
is
a
lot
of
hashes
that
are
very
important
for
us
on
swarm
applications,
oh
man
and
the
exile
website,
so
a
lot
of
content
that
we
have
on
ipfs
that
we
need
to
distribute
so
having
a
having
a
way
for
later
for
the
expo,
where
you
can
actually
pin
all
these.
It
will
also
increment
the
distribution
of
our
dapps
in
the
network,
because
the
user
will
be
able
to
pin
swapper,
oh
man,
our
website,
our
our
documents,
and
we
want
that.
F
I
mean,
if
I
guess,
if
it
is
easy,
like
two
minutes
where
you
create
an
api
key
or
pinata
or
or
any
other
opinion
services,
we
ensure
that
the
data
is
going
to
be
there.
H
No,
I
think,
obviously,
that's
the
way
like
having
like
a
dabno
package,
not
only
for
governance
syncing,
like
all
the
data
which,
which
we
kind
of
produce
from
govern,
doing
governance,
but
also
like
all
the
hosting
stuff
should
be
there
and
every
time
the
product
is
getting
updated.
The
package
is
like
checking
that
and
like
re-pinning
the
new
stuff
yeah
yeah.
F
Yeah
yeah
yeah
yeah,
definitely,
okay,
yeah.
This
is
something
that
we
should
explore.
First,
we
need
to
get
dx
volt
up
and
running
what
is
already
up
and
running
and
later
we
have
to
figure
out
better
ways
to
distribute
our
content.
C
C
Awesome,
well,
I
guess
if
you
said,
let's
we'll
set
up
a
time,
maybe
to
go
over
jake's
phone
stuff,
maybe
early
next
week
or
something
we
can
do,
that.
F
C
Awesome
anything
else.