►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-09-01]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
d
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
september,
1st
1500,
utc
and
happy
swapper
launch
day
happy
harvard
arbitrary
one
launch
day,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
on
mainnet.
There
are
kind
of
there's
three
big
proposals.
The
first
one
is
transfer
100
to
eve
to
die
for
the
dhd
buyback,
so
dc
buyback
is
in
its
second
iteration,
and
this
is
a
re-up
to.
I
believe
this
should
complete
the
additional
1
million
dollars
of
dxd
purchases.
B
The
next
is
it's
actually
a
couple.
Different
proposals
skye
has
a
couple
different
dhd
investing
proposals
for
different
ones.
Just
as
a
side
note,
we
are
trying
to
figure
out
a
a
new
system
for
getting
the
dxd
payments
out.
We
will
not
be
given
that
a
lot
of
contributors
are
coming
up
on
their
on
one
year
of
getting
dxd
payments.
We're
gonna
have
to
figure
out
a
way
to
get
those
distributed.
B
We
are
gonna
chat
about
this
in
the
contributor,
ux
and
we'll
kind
of
figure
out
a
way
to
move
forward
with
that,
and
then
the
other
proposal
is
just
transfer
700
east
to
aedx
style
base,
so
ada
style
base
still
working
on
names
or
titles
style
based
on
arbitrary
one.
So
this
is
a
a
lot
of
work's
been
going
into
this
last
couple
months,
and
this
is
meant
to
fund
the
base
and
also
be
used
as
liquidity
on
swapper
on
arbor
trump.
So
it
is.
B
This
is
actually
two
things
I
guess
to
notice
about
this.
This
is
using
a
new
multi-sig
and
therefore
new
e3
layer
contract.
So
I
submitted
the
proposal.
I
actually
did
two
separate
proposals,
one
for
five,
eighth
and
one
for
695
eth.
B
I
think
this
is
a
pretty
simple
contract,
but
given
the
amount
of
ethos,
just
it
went
with
the
the
double
just
to
be
double
safe
there,
but
this
is
a
new
ethereum
contract
and
a
new
multi-sig
that
has
the
same
signers
as
the
ones
before
they
they're
all
on
the
previous
multi-sig.
But
this
one
should
allow
us
to
have
the
same
address
on
multiple
networks,
so
I
think
we
now
have
the
same
address
on
mainnet,
xdi
and
polygon,
and
hopefully
that
is
on
drum.
I
guess
I
haven't.
B
I
don't
know
if
anyone's
tried,
gnosis
safe
on
arbitrary
one,
yet
I
would
gather
it's
not
yet
live,
but
maybe
it
is
coming
soon
and
then
the
second
thing
about
oh
yeah,
yeah.
C
I
was
gonna
say
for
that
test.
One
like
it's
definitely
a
good
idea.
I
think
to
do
the
test,
because
it's
much
ease
and
we'll
just
have
to
be
careful
to
do
the
test
quickly,
because
if
it
failed
for
someone
which
would
to
anticipate,
but
if
something
was
wrong,
we'd
have
to
vote
down
the
other
proposal
right.
B
C
B
Cool
and
then
second
on
this
proposal
for
the
liquidity
provisioning,
so
you
know
dicks
thousand,
providing
liquidity
on
swapper
on
both
main
and
x
dies.
So
this
would
be
the
first
one
on
arbor
drum,
but
it's
also
interesting
that
there's
you
know
this
is
happening
when
arbitrary
is
launching
lots
of
liquidity
kind
of
rushing
in
as
there's
some
opportunities
there
for
for
strategic
liquidity
allocation
to
different
pairs.
B
So
this
proposal
did
have
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
on
how
that
on
on
how
those
allocations
should
be
designed
decided
still
within
the
same,
like
you
know,
buckets
of
eth
and
stable
coins
stablecoin
pairs
and
that,
but
there
is
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
in
this
one.
B
And
just
for
like
it
would
be
good
to
do
this.
We
want
to
execute
this-
I
guess
next
week
and
so
thinking
about
the
plan.
This
will
be
wednesday
night.
The
test
proposal
will
go
through
and
then
thursday
would
be
the
time
that
we
could
get
the
funds
over
to
adx
dao,
and
this
will
probably
take
a
little
bit
of
coordination
to
acquire
the
funds
and
then
bridge
over
and
everything
like
that,
so
maybe
planning
next
thursday.
For
that.
B
Well
and
then
x-diabase,
starting
with,
I
think,
that's
it
for
for
mainnet
bass
and
then
x-type
ace.
There
is
a
couple
different
proposals:
there's
a
member
balancer
for
west
and
xdxd.
I
was
wondering
I
don't
know
if
skyr
or
you
still
could
talk
about
this
briefly,
because
I
think
this
was
done
through
like
deke's
vote
and
it's
kind
of
a
little
confusing
because
it
was
like
sending,
I
guess
within
xtxd,
but
not
through
the
funding
and
voting
power
scheme.
E
Yeah,
so
you
could
so
member
balancers,
typically
in
the
past,
have
been
funding
like
a
single
token
funding
and
voting
proposals
through
alchemy.
So
you
can
request
one
like
member
balancer.
What
do
we
do
like
we
did?
I
don't
remember
what
we
started.
What
was
the
main
use
case
of
it
actually
was
it,
but
what
were
you
trying
to
diversify.
E
By
the
treasury
yeah,
so
that
was
like
you
did
one
token,
so
you
sent
tokens
to
the
dow
and
then
you
requested
that
token
back
from
the
dow
and
there
was
this
like
risk
period.
So
in
this
scenario
there
was
a
small
bit
of
two
different
tokens,
so
wef
and
xtxt,
which
already
xdxd,
has
an
issue
with
alchemy.
You
can't
request
the
correct
xdxd
in
alchemy,
unless
you
like
jerry
rig
it
like
john's
done
so
having
the
multi-call
is
actually
pretty
powerful.
E
So
in
one
proposal
you
can
have
two
separate
fun
or
two
separate
transactions
and
and
you
the
tricky
thing,
is
getting
the
abi
code
or
whatever
like
the
actual
code,
and
so
there's
a
tool
for
that,
and
so
you
can
manually.
E
I
think
you
can
do
it
in
metamask,
like
you
can
you
can
set
up
a
transaction
in
metamask
or
you
can
use
like
this
api
code
tool
and
you
can
basically
set
up
to
get
the
inputs
for
how
to
send
to
like
a
token
to
a
certain
address,
and
it's
not
straightforward
but
like.
Maybe
we
can
make
a
like
a
post
or
tutorial
about
it,
and
then
you
just
do
two
separate,
basically
token
sends
which
send
from
the
dow
to
to
to
a
single
address.
E
And
then
you,
you
put
those
in
the
same
proposal
and
then
and
that's
the
single
proposal.
There
was
like
an
there,
was
one
that
augusto
did
first,
but
it
didn't
have
the
details
of
like
what
it
was
actually
happening.
So
it's
like
just
send
tokens,
and
so
I
just
redid
it
like
myself
like
from
scratch
to
see.
E
If
I
could
do
it
and
then
also
include
all
the
details
of
like
the
address
of
like
what
the
transactions
that
were
actually
being
sent
and
that
was
used
basically
to
to
get
a
little
bit
of
token
into
the
farming
real
layer
because
we
had
a
farm
starting,
but
the
farming
real
layer
didn't
have
wasn't
funded
fully.
E
It
was
only
partially
funded
and
so
you'd
have
to
do
a
whole
separate
proposal
and
go
for
five
six
days
in
order
to
get
that
funding
in,
so
that
really
the
relators
are
good,
but
the
relayers
slow
thing
down
it's
the
extra
step.
So
the
member
balancer,
in
that
case,
like
was
a
quicker
rate
to
it,.
C
And
yeah
this
is
possible
on
an
xty
multi
call
scheme,
but
not
on
mainnet
yeah
would.
C
Yes,
it
should
be
possible
in
arbitrarium,
but
yeah
like
I
mean,
like
we're
kind
of
you're
kind
of
saying
right
this.
We
need
to
make
improvements
to
the
voting
interface,
to
make
sure
that
it's
super
clear.
What's
going
on
here,
it's
it's
sort
of
risky
when
things
are
not
very
clear.
What's
going
on
so
yeah.
D
E
Exactly
yeah-
and
this
is
something
you
can't
do
on
alchemy,
so
like
dx
vote,
like
dx
vote,
there's
already
like
five
things
that
we
can
do
now
that
you
can't
do
on
alchemy
that,
like
make
everything
much
much
better
like
knowing
what
your
proposals
to
redeem
sending
food
tokens
at
the
same
time,
yeah
a
whole
whole
bunch
of
things.
So.
E
Yeah,
like
last
week
last
week,
alchemy
wasn't
working,
and
so
it
was
the
the
proposals
weren't
feeding,
and
so
you
basically
have
to
rely
on
dx
vote.
But
dx
vote
is
different
to
like
look
through
proposals.
It's
a
whole
different
like
experience,
so
we
need
to
I
put
in
like
a
feature
request
to
augusto,
to
like
better
organize
like
how
you
look
at
which
proposals
need
to
be
like
actually
looked
at,
because
that's
a
little
easier,
like
they're,
organized
a
little
better
in
alchemy,
but
if
alchemy's
not
working,
that's
useless.
E
B
Yeah
and
even
like,
I
was
actually
dave-
and
I
were
talking
about
this
before
the
call
of
just
like
thinking
of
all,
even
like
the
buyback
like
how
can
we
start
having
like
buyback
transactions,
go
through
dx
votes?
So
that's
something
we're
going
to
try
to
do
is
like
everything
that
we
do
in
governance,
for
you
know
providing
liquidity,
even
I
guess,
like
ian
s,
domain
updates
even
kind
of
thinking
about
those
how
we
eventually
do
those.
B
Even
when
I
was
like
putting
the
agenda
for
this
call,
I
went
to
dee's
vote
to
like
copy
the
proposals
and
some
of
the
links,
rather
than
alchemy,
just
as
like
a
way
to
get
you
in
that
the
habit
of
doing
it,
because
it
will
take
like
a
transition
time
so
just
quickly,
because
the
one
thing
I
I
tried
to
do
a
proposal
actually
for
like
a
payout
for
my
contributor
and
I
was
able
to
get
the
token
transfer
there,
but
I
wasn't
able
to
get
the
the
rep,
but
then
the
other
thing
I
was
going
to
do.
B
E
E
You
just
see
the
wallet
address
that
that
submitted
the
transaction,
and
sometimes
you
see
a
mix
of
the
two
and
that's
basically
like
a
it's,
not
the
graph,
but
that's
ipf
like
pulling
the
data
from
ipfs
and
sometimes
it's
just
much
slower,
and
so
eventually
it
usually
loads,
but
that
I
don't
think
the
issue
you
are
facing.
Is
that,
like
you
def
you
don't
definitely
need
your
own
pinata
keys.
No,
but
that's
that's
what
I
my
understanding,
but
augusto
obviously
would
know
the
best
yeah.
B
Just
to
because
we
could
get
a
little
sidetracked
here,
but
this
was
because
you're
using
a
proposal
to
use
dx
vote
for
a
memo
balancer
that
was
on
xda
there
just
to
kind
of
quickly
go
through
the
different
exercise.
Proposals,
there's
dxd
buyback,
number,
37
and
number
38
are
their
funding
proposals
and
multi-call
proposals.
B
Lev
ota
contributor
proposal,
tammy
worker
proposal,
the
dxdown
discord
rep
boost
for
cabello-
are
all
there
francesco
was
on
the
call
earlier
it's
his
is
his
last
proposal
there
and
some
words
there
to
check
out
and
go
vote
and
then
just
boosted.
I
think
this
morning
is
the
greater
than
workshop
in
dx
retreat
proposal.
That,
I
believe,
is
from
nylon.
B
And
then
exciting,
moving
from
mainnet
to
xdi
now
doing
a
proposal
roundup
on
the
official
third
dxdot
base
on
arbor
trim
one
there
is,
I
believe,
two
proposals
live
one
that
is
set
to
pass
the
initial
permission,
setting
proposal
on
arbitrary
one-
and
I
also
believe
this
is
the
other
thing
is
dx
vote-
is
now
up
on
away
from
magusto's
github
and
on
dxvote.eth.
B
Of
course,
the
daddy
that
link
comes
with
another
set
of
problems
now
but
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
the
goose
store
john
wanted
to
talk
about
this
initial
permission.
Setting
proposal
that's
set
to
pass
today
on
the
deexed
out
based
on
arbitrary
one
and
what
that
will
kind
of
mean
going
forward
for
the
the
base
there.
C
I
can
talk
if
augusto's
not
able
to
unmute
here
but
yeah.
There's
there's
two
permissions
proposals.
The
first
one
was
actually
a
mistake
as
you'll
notice,
though
somebody
kind
of
aped
in
and
boosted
it,
but
now
their
vote
is,
is
losing.
Unfortunately,
that
means
that
those
dxd
are
going
to
adx,
dao
and
they'll,
be
a
25
rep.
Slash
so
definitely
be
careful
when
doing
your
alchemy
and
now
tx
vote
voting,
but
yeah.
The
idea
here.
C
C
So
you
can,
you
know,
potentially
do
things
in
a
faster
way
with
you
know,
specific
amounts
of
funds
that
you
know
limit
the
risks
and
the
idea
here
with
the
initial
liquidity
mining
on
arbitram,
for
the
swapper
token,
is
to
use
the
swapper
quick
wallet
scheme
to
kick
off
all
of
those
campaigns
and
so
part
of.
D
C
Initial
launch
plan
was
for
the
deployer
to
put
at
6
point
something
million,
swapper
tokens
onto
this
quick
wallet
scheme
and
so
yeah.
Those
are
in
place
and
kind
of
ready
to
go
for
liquidity
mining.
Once
this
proposal
passes
in
seven
hours,
the
the
swapper
quick
wallet
scheme
should
be
like
enabled
to
interact
with
the
farming
contracts
on
on
arbitrary.
So
this
is
sort
of
opening
like
enabling
governance,
to
kick
off
farming
campaigns
on
arbitrage.
C
And
if
you
look
at
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
the
parameters
are
are
such
that
it
can
boost
in.
I
think
it's
12
hours
and
then
the
boosting
period
is
one
day.
So
if
we
look
at
the
timeline
like
in
theory
here,
we
could
post
a
proposal
to
do
the
first
farming
campaign
on
arbitrary,
with
swapper,
starting
in
like
seven
hours.
If
this
proposal
passes
as
it's
looking
at
well
and
then
in
a
day
and
a
half
that
farming
campaign
proposal
could
could
potentially
pass
as
well
right.
C
Not
that
that's
necessarily
the
plan,
I'm
just
like
that's
that's
kind
of
what's
enabled
here
with
the
governance
setting
so
yeah.
It's
a
bit
hard
to
read
this.
I
think
federico
and
me
did
do
some
review
for
gusto
to
confirm
that
it
was
formatted
and
working
correctly.
C
Yeah,
it's
not
the
easiest
to
understand,
but
it's
basically
setting
a
whole
bunch
of
permissions
for
this
swapper
wallet
scheme
and
it
probably
doesn't
make
sense
to
go
through
it
now.
But
you
can
kind
of
see
like
it's
that
setting,
like
which
token
you
know
the
from
address
like
the
permissions
to
send
from
you,
know
the
avatar
or
the
quick
wallet
scheme
to
something
so
yeah
like
so
you
see
some
quick
wallet
schemes
being
a
quick
wallet
scheme
separate
from
the
swapper
wallet
scheme.
So
this
is
actually
setting
some
permissions.
C
F
F
We
have
all
the
all
the
tools
to
improve
it,
so
the
idea
would
be
to
show
that
in
a
more
readable
way,
for
example,
when
you're
seeing
acid
zero
means
that
you
are
transferring
or
executing
ethereum
the
smart
contract
calls
and
when,
when
you're,
seeing
an
asset
with
an
address,
that
means
that
refers
to
that
to
a
token.
So
in
the
future,
instead
of
showing
the
address
of
the
asset,
we
are
going
to
show
the
name
like,
for
example,
swapper
token,
and
instead
of
showing
zero
x,
we
are
going
to
show
any
function.
F
So
you
will
see,
for
example,
the
avatar
is
allowing
to
call
isp,
is
being
allowed
to
call
this
contract
and
call
any
function
or
call
only
the
function
with
the
signature
with
this
signature
and
send
at
maximum
this
amount
of
ether
and
the
same
for
the
for
the
tokens
you
are,
you
are
going
to
be
seeing
swapper
token
is
being
allowed
to
be
transferred
between
the
avatar
and
the
software
wallet
scheme,
and
the
software,
as
wallet
scheme
is
being
allowed
to
transfer
swapper
tokens
between
the
avatar
and
the
swapper
factory
contracts.
C
Another
thing
that
is
planned
right
august:
I
know
you've
been
busy
with
a
bunch
of
stuff,
but
is
to
do
the
adjusting
the
dxd
staking
amounts.
F
Oh
yes,
yes
about
that,
we
should
do
it.
In
fact,
we
should
do
it
soon.
Very
soon
we
have
already
a
proposal
ready
to
be
a
proposal
already
designed,
but
yeah,
maybe
I'll.
Where
should
we
talk
about
this
in
the
in
the
government
chat
or
should
I
create
a
dow
talk
topic
with
the
with
the
schemes
proposed.
C
B
B
Dx
vote
too,
I
don't
know
if
we
should
be
doing
that
link,
but
I
think
it
is
it's
good
to
start
linking
there
from
the
forum.
F
Yeah
we
also,
we
need
a
way
to
verify
that
the
the
configuration
that
is
being
said,
because
why
this
is
very,
very
powerful,
because
you
can
change
the
entire
configuration
of
the
scheme.
The
voting
parameters
mainly,
but
we
also
talked
about
removing
removing
the
border
reputation
loss
ratio.
C
C
We
should
start
a
place
where
people
can
kind
of
express
their
opinions
about
the
different
parameters,
because
there's
a
lot
to
configure
there
but
yeah
the
voting
loss
of
like
25
percent
like
on
this
one,
that
it's
a
little
bit
aggressive,
I
think
and
and
the
dxd
is
gonna
start
adding
up
real
quickly
with
the
farming
campaigns
and
stuff.
So
we
should
lower
that.
I
think.
B
And
just
to
like
kind
of
emphasize
so
like
governance
is
live
on
arbitrary
one
like
now
right,
the
network
is
live
if
you've
got
rb
and
you
were
like
a
rep
holder,
I'm
not
exactly
sure
that
when
the
rep
was
mapped
like
you
can
go
and
participate
in
governance
now
on
arbor
trip
one.
But
I
think
what
john's
saying
is
like
be
very,
very
careful,
because
this
is
very
new
stuff
that
we're
still
figuring
out
and
configuring.
F
Yes,
exactly
yes,
but
you
will
have
the
repetition,
I
guess
yeah,
we
share
it.
It's
annoyed,
it's
a
no
block.
I
think
it's
two
months
ago
we
can
sink
the
reputation.
There
is
other
thing
that
we
can
do.
Actually
we
can
do
three
things.
One
is
to
update
the
voting
parameters,
the
value
that
we
want
to
change
the
required
dxe
for
staking
the
removing
the
voter
reputation,
loss
ratio
or
lowering
a
lot
and
also
we
need
to
set
the
booster
require
both
percentage.
F
This
is
something
that
we
set
in
the
in
this
initial
permissions
proposal.
The
border
required
the
required
percentage
for
boosted
proposals
that
needs
to
be
set
on
a
different
call
to
the
the
executing
machine.
We
cannot
call
it
yet.
F
We
will
be
able
to
call
it
once
the
what
the
permissions
are
allowed
and
another
important
thing
is
that
after
the
permissions
are
allowed,
we
have
the
we
have
a
time
delay
and
I
think
arbitrary
is
one
or
two
three
one
or
three
days
so
after
you
set
the
allowance
for,
for
the
permission,
you
have
to
wait
some
time
for
it
to
be
executed.
F
Well,
if
it's
going
to,
if
it's
going
to
be
allowed
in,
for
example,
in
three
days
and
the
farming
proposal
is
going
to
take,
I
know
for
five
days,
you
can
do
it
now
right,
so
you
know
that
in
five
days
this
permission
is
going
to
be
enabled.
You
just
need
to
have
to
take
that
in
out.
C
Yeah-
let's
sync
up
after
this
call
about
that,
because
the
timing,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
pretty
important
guess
some
people
are
pretty
eager
to
get
that
those
campaigns
kicked
off.
So
we
should
know
exactly
when
that.
Do
you
know
how
long
the
permissions
grace
period
is.
B
C
C
C
C
By
that
time
the
permissions
will
be
enabled
right.
So
we
can
actually
execute
and
send
the
swapper
from
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
to
the
firmware
campaign.
F
E
One
other
important
thing
on
arbitrom
on
jake's
vote,
arbitrary
or
yeah.
A
dx
dow
is
a
whole
bunch
of
people,
probably
don't
have
the
right
amount
of
rep,
and
so,
if
you
have
the
rep
on
mainnet
right,
which
some
people
have
topped
up
according
to
like
recent
proposals
and
stuff,
but
I
think
this
snapshots
from
a
while
ago,
so
people
should
do
rep
top-ups
on
arbitrome
if
they're
missing
rep
compared
to
mainnet,
which
is
the
same
number
you
have
on
mainnet.
E
I
don't
know
like
if
you
obviously
don't
want,
like
20
people
doing
at
the
same
time.
Maybe
if
we
have
other
important
proposals-
and
I
don't
know
about
what
staking
and
all
that
stuff
demands
are,
but
it's
a
good
way
for
people
to
get
used
to
doing
proposals
on
arbitrary
and
it
makes
it
better
if
everyone
has
the
right
amount
of
rep,
because
some
people,
like
don't
have
any
rep
on
arbitrary,
should
have
rap
right.
B
Completely
agree,
I
think
it's
like
it
would
be
nice,
then
you
think
about
like
what
is
governance
on
arbor
trim,
one
in
the
initial
stages
and
it's
like
swapper
campaigns,
launching
those
kind
of
facilitating
those
but
then
also
like
syncing,
I
guess
rep
or
getting
people
involved
in
like
dx
votes.
So
I
guess
I'm
looking
and
I
can
see
the
percentage
that
I
have
in
the
arbitrary
base,
but
I
don't
actually
is
there
a
way
to
see
the
exact
amount
that
I
have.
G
You
don't
see
it
in
your
user
in
your
user
page
for
the
amount
of
rep.
Is
that
the
question?
Where
do
you
see
the
yeah.
F
Also,
all
these
all
these
issues
that
are
easy
to
fix,
I
assign
it
with
good
first
issues
so
later.
If
a
new
contributor
needs
to
help
on
the
export
they
can,
they
just
can
be
assigned
to
one
of
them
like,
for
example,
I
think
adam
took
a
took.
Another
took
a
good
first
issue
and
he
assigned
it
to
himself.
B
B
B
You
know,
I
guess
dave
fits
zero,
so
he
knows
that
he
can
subtract
whichever
one
he
has,
but
for
those
that
have
rap
on
arbor
drum,
but
maybe
not
enough.
We'll
have
to
know
that
number,
but
at
the
agree
sky
we
should.
We
should
be
doing
this
and
maybe
like
get
a
template
out
or
some
initial
proposals
for
people
that
have
done
it.
E
Well,
those
dave
you
had
on
xti,
so
there's
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
people
that
only
have
rep
on
x
die
and
they
have
like
the
right
to
rep
on
main
net
and
really
you
should
do
your
main
net
top
up
first
before
you
then
ask
for
that
amount
of
rep
on
arbitrary,
because
main
net
number
rep
is
the
is
like
the
final
answer.
I
think
right.
So
if
you
haven't
done
main
net
top
up,
you
then
have
another
step
to
do.
E
B
Right,
that's
like
the
justification,
but
that's
not
like
the
source
of
truth,
but
the
source
of
truth
is
still
like
main
net,
so
you
can
reference
the
exit
one
to
get
the
main
at
one
but
yeah.
These
are
all
things
I
mean
this
is
the
challenges
that
kind
of
managing
the
rep
here
and
sinking,
and
I
think
gas
is
a
concern
here-
is
kind
of
a
limiting
factor
across
these
things.
F
One
of
the
things
that
we
can
do
we're
can
start
thinking,
reputation
through
wired
scheme,
for
example
the
master
quality.
Him
has
a
maximum
reputation
change
to
five
percent.
So
we
can.
We
can
get
how
much
the
reputation
change
in
mainland
between
the
block
that
we
update
that
we
use
and
the
and
the
latest
one,
and
if
it
changes
ten
percent
with
two
proposals,
we
can
update
the
reputation
too
much
the
one
minute.
C
This
is
all
really
important,
but
I
think
that
the
first
priority
is
is
getting
the
swapper
campaign
set
up
and
making
sure
that
works.
Well,
and
you
know
then
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
to
kind
of
sort
out
and.
B
B
F
C
B
Okay,
I
guess
that's
kind
of
it
for
the
proposal
round
up
across
the
three
bases:
lots
of
things
going
on
there
just
like
that,
the
other
things
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
to
hit
on
before
we've
talked
a
lot
about
the
expo
about
nurburgring.
Once
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
anymore
on
that,
but
then
swapper
stuff
has
been
exciting
and
a
lot
of
things
going
on
here.
B
As
I
said,
it
would
be
a
lot
of
governance
for
going
on
that
on
our
bedroom,
one
to
getting
those
campaigns
started
and
then
the
two
more
open
discussion.
I
guess
the
treasury
diversification
v3
post
that
I
think
went
up
last
week
and
it's
gotten
some
interesting
feedback
and
then
the
proposal
dx
ventures
grant
to
hats,
but
for
before
that
was
there
anything
we
needed
to
kind
of
check
in
on
swapper
token
I
know
there's
I
guess
I
could
just
getting
dx
stats
up
there.
H
Getting
sleep
basically
the
extents
and
yeah,
but
yeah,
and
obviously
farming
on
arbitrom.
C
So
dx
stats-
there's,
I
think
your
release
is
almost
ready.
Federico
can
probably
address
that
takes
four
days.
Obviously,
the
update
the
ens
content
hash
on
maintenance,
but
I
mean
dx
stats.
C
It's
just
a
you
know
a
read,
only
kind
of
information
site,
basically
right,
so
something
that
could
be
done
is
you
know
pretty
much.
Anybody
could
take
that
release
and
deploy
it
to
something
and
share
that
with
the
community,
while
we're
waiting
for
the
actual
dx
stat
study
to
be
updated,
which
may
make
sense
if
we
want
to
get
a
stat
site
out
asap.
H
I
think,
as
as
long
as
we
get
it
up
before,
farming,
that's
good
and
I
think
we
will
so
I
don't
think
people
are
too
interested
right
now.
I
I
haven't
seen
anyone
actually
ask
for
it.
I've
seen
someone
saying
that
stats
for
arbitration-
it's
not
there,
but
I
don't
think
people
actually
want
to
look
at
the
stats
yet,
but
as
soon
as
we
start
planning
showing
the
farms,
I
think
people
want
to
see
the
stats.
H
It's
a
lot
of
support
like
a
lot
yeah,
so
it's.
B
Great
sorry,
go
ahead.
I
was
just
gonna
say
it's
great-
that
the
air
drop
is
also
happening
with
arbitrary
one
launch,
so
people
are
kind
of
like
using
that
as
an
opportunity
to
like
play
around
on
orbit
from
one
and
not
necessarily
like.
Oh
what
can
I
do
with
this
token
that
I
just
got
air
dropped
and
so
they'll
probably
run
out
of
that
fascination
in
like
the
next
couple
days,
but
then
we'll
have
farming
to
kind
of
come
right
after
that
and
attract
people.
I
H
I
think
we
we
could
send
out
the
tweets
we
should
just
maybe
coordinate,
so
we
have
people
ready
to
respond
on
telegram
on
discord.
H
I
was
actually
up
all
night
yesterday,
just
responding
to
people,
because
that
is
that
link
was
down
and
every
single
person
had
a
problem
right.
No
one
knows
how
to
get
to
an
enos,
and
I
understand
them.
It's
no
one's
actually
learning
educating
people
to
go
to
inesses,
so
I
was
up
just
answering
every
single
one,
so
I
don't
we
can't,
even
though
the
airdrop
should
be
foolproof.
People
still
will
ask
like
details
about
networks.
We
might
have
like
missed
stuff
and
we
don't
want
the
chat
to
be
filled
with
the
angry
people.
Basically,.
I
Nathan
says
it's
spotty,
but
we
should
be
good
yeah,
so
is
it
okay,
if
I
send
them
out
after
this
call.
H
We
should
coordinate
just
with
who
who
who
will
be
online
because,
obviously
for
us
in
europe,
it's
it's
late
already
now,
but
if
we
push
we
need
people
to
be
there
to
respond.
I
rather
not
be
up
all
night
again.
I
Yeah
fair
enough,
so
I
guess
just
let
me
know
when
you
want
me
to
push
them
because
they
are
ready.
B
Cool
well
that'll
continue
to
be
exciting.
Swapper
love
the
kind
of
energy
of
the
last
couple
days
and
specifically,
the
last
kind
of
12
to
16
hours.
It's
fun
to
see
people
come
in
and
ask
questions
and
people
and
different
people
in
the
community
answer.
I
was
just
looking
at
a
comment
from
like
the
rf
new
that
he
made
like
an
hour
ago.
That
was
like
six
or
seven
bullet
points
that
are
like
answering
a
bunch
of
questions.
C
Trouble
or
trying
to
understand
why
they
don't
have
an
airdrop,
it's
still
an
opportunity
to
like
chat
with
those
people
and
like
learn
about
where
they're
from
like
I
was.
Somebody
opened
a
ticket
from
bankless,
and
you
know
they
weren't
eligible
for
the
airdrop,
because
their
voting
actions
had
come
after
the
snapshot.
C
But
you
know
I
was
like.
Oh
hey,
I'm
in
the
bank
list
now
too,
like
blah
blah
blah,
you
know
we're
talking
about
maybe
doing
some
joint
community
calls
like
the
whole
point
of
this
airdrop
is
to
you
know
us
to
reward
dxd
holders,
but
also
to
engage
other
communities.
So
we
should
take
advantage
of
that,
and
that
means,
like
everybody,
everybody
here
getting
in
the
discord
and
like
being
part
of
the
conversation
following
along
answering
when
you
can.
C
I
think
we
might
do
some
organization
around
shifts
of
like
who
will
cover
when,
because
it's
good
to
to
make
sure
we're.
Like
that's
saying
it's,
it's
not
great.
To
have
to
make
him
stay
up
all
night.
We
need
to
make
sure
we're
doing
a
good
job
covering
it
like
crypto's
24
7,
and
we
need
to
adapt
to
that
right.
But
the
other
thing
is:
there's
a
one
percent
like
a
discretionary
part
of
the
marketing
airdrop.
C
I
think
it
was
the
people
in
the
I
don't
understand.
Maybe
you
guys
could
tell
me
what
the
actual
issue
is,
but
there
was
like
a
people
in
the
palace
weren't
getting
the
air
drop.
I
don't
know
anything
about
staked
out
but,
like
I
think
all
of
this
is
opportunities
that
we
need
to
capitalize
on
them
right.
This
is
very
important
to
do
this
to
like
take
that
interest
and
convert
it
into
kind
of
lasting
interest
in
not
only
swapper
but
takes
down
in
the
community
at
large
yeah.
What
is
the
palace.
H
We
basically
messed
up
that
airdrop.
We
we
yeah,
I
mean
we
can't
know
everything
about
every
of
those
like
communities,
I'm
not
blaming
us
100,
but
I
tried
to
actually
talk
to
stakedown
people
during
etc,
but
yeah
conversations
went
to
another
place
and
they
were
just
happy
getting
their
drop.
We
should
have
like
asked,
maybe
like
more
technical
like
is
that
correct,
or
this
correct?
We
had
it
up
on
the
forum
for
a
while.
I
know
we
got
a
comment.
H
I
don't
think
we
understood
the
comment
and
that's
why
we
probably
made
the
wrong
decision
and
so
yeah,
but
from
I've
talked
to
them
like
they
dm
me
and
I
actually
went
to
their
discord
yesterday
to
talk
to
them
and-
and
I
think
we
should
allocate
some
parts
of
that-
one
percent
to
them.
C
Yeah,
I
think,
like
these,
it's
kind
of
natural
that
some
things
are
unanticipated
right
like
it's.
The
airdrop
script
was
already
very
complicated
and
I
think
the
important
thing
is
this
is
actually
an
opportunity
right
when
you
have
a
problem,
how
you
handle
it
like.
That's,
really
an
opportunity
to
impress
people.
It's
like
a
customer
service
type
thing
right
like
when
somebody
has
difficulty
how
you
respond
to
that
and
they're
like
disappointment,
can
really
leave
like
a
lasting
impression.
C
So
I
think,
like
the
fact
that,
there's
you
know
people
tweeting
about
not
getting
the
the
stakedown
airdrop,
that's
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
to
be
proactive
and
impress
them
with
with
our
community
and
how
we
make
decisions.
E
That
same
problem
actually
happens
has
happened
multiple
times
with,
like
air
drops
in
the
stakedown
community
like,
and
then
they
have
to
like,
go
and
fix
them.
So
if
we
go
and
fix
it
then
yeah
it
does.
It
does
give
us
a
lot
of
like
good
added
value
for
added
karma.
C
E
H
E
My
question
was
going
to
be:
how
hard
would
it
be
to
use
a
very
light
version
of
erc20
guild
like
with
a
super
easy
interface
which
already
exists
somewhere
else
just
to
do
simple,
swapper
token
votes
like
yes
or
no
on
on
arbitrome,
like
that's
all
you
just
just
yes
or
no
votes
using
swapper
token
on
arbitrary,
oh.
F
How
difficult
what
oh
man
I
don't
know,
take.
F
F
E
B
B
It
could
happen
in
the
next
week
because
I
think
snapshot
presumably
will
be
on
our
like.
I
think
all
these
will
probably
go
on
arbor
trim
one
over
the
coming
weeks,
but
I
think
we
would
need
to
be
able
to
act
within
the
next
week
right
or
two,
and
so
I
don't
see
how
it
wouldn't
be
rep
holders
making
that
decision.
H
B
But
yeah
as
much
as
I
just
like
it
as
a
base
level
of
governance
like
discord,
governance
like
I
think
that
is
a
way
of
like
forming
consensus
in
a
way
like
the
discussion
that
happens
from
that
people
can
even
use
like
the
emojis
there,
as
opposed
to
it
being
like
a
google
sheet.
I
don't
know
kind
of
go
back
and
forth
for
like
how
we
get
the
soft
consensus.
C
So
yeah
we
haven't
launched
guilds
yet
swapper
guild
is
a
priority
and
it
was
being
discussed
yesterday
on
the
the
dev
call.
So
I
think
we're
actually
going
to
have
a
serious
team
formed
around
moving
forward
with
the
swapper
guild,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
like
in
two
weeks
for
sure
but
yeah.
I
view
this
as
like.
The
rep
holders
are
the
ones
voting
on
on
the
arbitrary
base
right.
C
So
they're,
like
the
final
filter
approval
on
on
these
proposals,
right
to
add
additional
incentives,
but,
like
the
process,
is
kind
of
more
important.
I
think
what
you're
like
what
you're
saying
chris
right,
like
it's
engaging
with
these
communities
coming
up
with
a
reasonable
proposal
with
them
and
and
kind
of
getting
that
to
a
point
where
it's
up
on
the
arbitrary
base.
F
F
So
if
we
integrate
the
guilds
in
the
export,
we
should
do
both
of
them
and
later
maybe
omen
you
know.
So
we
should
take
the
chance
and
I
use
this
opportunity
to
bring
dfz
dxd
guild
also
alive.
Imagine
that
you
go
to
the
gear
stop
and
you
see
your
dft
and
swap
rebalance
and
your
reputation.
So
that
will
be
the
idea,
because
the
code
is
going
to
be
almost
the
same.
H
B
Cool
we
are
running
with
the
hour.
I
just
wanted
to
no
proposals
live,
and
I
don't
have
any
not
to
I
don't
know,
they'll
be
submitted,
but
both
the
dx
ventures
grant
to
hats.
That's
proposal,
I
think,
is
in
like
the
finalist
draft
and
seems
to
have
pretty
good
consensus.
I
even
saw
clement
come
in
into
the
forum
today
and
give
positive
words
for
hats,
so
I
think
we're
actually
gonna
expect
that
on
main
net,
if
I'm,
if
I
recall
there'll,
also
be
kind
of
some
security.
B
Aspects
that
will
go
with
that
with
the
the
dxd
component
tammy's
not
on,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
there's
any
thoughts
on
that
briefly.
C
Yeah,
there's
kind
of
two
parts
with
the
relationship
with
the
hats
does
the
proposed
grant
to
to,
and
that
comes
with,
like
some
hats
token,
and
then
there's
also
using
hats,
which
involves
setting
up
a
committee,
we're
in
the
process
of
that
I'll,
probably
be
devs
and
product
managers
who
are
responsible
for
assessing
bug
reports
and
also
putting
some
dxt
into
a
vault
that
would
act
as
like
the
bounty
pool
and
based
on
the
severities
that
you
specify
up
front
a
certain
amount
of
that
body
pool
would
be
eligible
for
for
awarding
people
who
report
find
bugs
that
the
committee,
like
verifies,
are
indeed
bugs
of
a
certain
severity,
so
something
that
we
need
to
decide
and
maybe
is
worth
just
mentioning
here.
C
I
know
we're
about
to
run
out
of
time,
but
we
need
to
decide
how
much
dxd
to
put
into
that
vault.
I
thought.
Maybe
some
you
know
they
were
suggesting
half
a
million
dollars
worth
you
know.
Dxd
has
been
going
up.
I
thought
maybe
something
like
500
dxd
might
be
a
good
amount,
but
that
was
just
my
my
view
on
it.
B
B
C
Hasn't
really
been
in
the
forum,
there
are
threads
that
are
about
this
that
were
posted
by
the
hats
team.
So
I
mean
the
concepts
are
on
down
talk,
but
I
don't
think
we've
like
really
discussed
who
would
be
on
and
why
et
cetera.
B
C
I
couldn't
there's
not
really
an
urgency,
I
think
you
know
they
just
launched.
So
there
is,
I
think,
sometimes
sensitivity
around
how
it
works
out
as
like
a
pr
initiative-
and
I
think
there
I
forgot,
what
they're
calling
it
I
keep,
calling
it
security
mining,
but
it's
something
else:
they're
they're
mining
they're,
allowing
you
to
like
protocol.
C
Protocol
protection
mining
yeah-
I'm
not
going
to
remember
that
one
but
like
if
you
lock
up
txd
or
the
native
token
for
projects
that
have
these
vaults,
then
you
can
actually
earn
hats.
So
there's
going
to
be
liquidity
mining!
Basically,
for
these
bouncy
pools
protocol
protection
binding,
I
will
try
to
remember
it,
and
so
I
think
that's
starting
in
a
few
weeks
and
that's
a
good
opportunity
for
dxd
holders.
If
we
can
get
this
committee
and
stuff
in
the
vault
stood
up
sooner
rather
than
later.
A
Yeah
and
the
good
thing
about
it
is,
we
can
always
add
more
and
I
believe
500
is
a
pretty
good
number
to
start
with,
given
where
gxd
token
is
headed.
So
if
there's
any
need
for
us
to
make
any
amendments
in
the
future,
we
can
feel
free
to
do
it
at
any
time.
And
it's
there's
no
constraint
it's.
It's
not
locked
yeah,
more.
E
Yeah,
it
makes
total
sense
to
use
dxd
the
one
thing
on
the
on
the
two
different
sides
of
it
is,
so
they
did
their
announcement
with
like
their
seed
round
with
like
a
bunch
of
investors,
and
then
they
mentioned
like
two
launch
partners
in
that
article
and
then
actually
in
like
the
video,
I
think,
dix
that
was
in
there
as
well,
but
not
mentioned
in
the
article.
But
what's
unique
is
we
would
probably
be
the
only
project
that
we
would
be
like
an
early
user.
E
So
one
of
the
launch
partners
or
like
early
launch
partner
and
with
like
the
additional
grant
for
which,
which
is
mainly
a
grant,
and
that
would
give
us
additional
hats
tokens.
E
That's
like
a
you,
like
a
an
early
user,
leaning
into
it,
with
an
additional
grant
to
like
really
show
commitment
to
the
project,
and
so
I
think,
there's
a
possibility
of
like
another
announcement
like
as
a
follow-up,
because
they've
already
announced
their
initial
like
rounds
and
stuff,
and
so
we
get
grouped
in
not
as
like
just
an
investor
which
we're
not
we're
really
like
we're,
really
a
community
user
and
leaning
into
it.
E
For
like
kind
of
ownership
in
the
protocol,
which
we
believe
in
and
we're
using
so
no
one,
no
one
else
is
in
like
the
two-sided
position.
So
we
we
could
make
a
like
a
pretty
good
publicity
about
that.
I
think.
B
I
also
think,
as
john's
saying
before
is
people
come
into
the
community.
They
see
things.
This
is
exactly
the
type
of
thing
like
someone
comes
in
and
geeks
down
like
okay.
What
else
are
they
doing?
Who
else
are
they
collaborating
with,
and
I
think,
like
hats
kind
of,
says
something
about
what
we're
interested
in
too.
So
it's
a
good
yeah
good
thing
to
do
publicity.
I
think
too,.
C
Yeah
and
just
to
make
sure
this
is
clear,
like
the
the
500
dc
or
whatever
dx
style
puts
up
into
the
vault.
That's
earning
hats,
but
there's
also,
I
think,
there's
a
cap
or
will
be
a
cap
on
the
total
amount
in
the
evolve,
but
it
would
be
open
to
the
community
to
also
put
in
dxd
so
so
when
the
community
also
puts
in
dxda,
contributes
to
the
vault
and
that
total
vault
is
the
kind
of
eligible
pool
to
be
rewarded
to
the
bug.
Finders.
A
C
A
Proof
of
stake
yeah.
This
actually
makes
me
think
what,
if
we
do
not
have,
the
capacity
to
you
know
make
a
good
educated
decision.
Whether
something
is
a
concern
or
not
like
do.
We
have
to
engage
third
parties
to
weigh
in
on
this.
Like
would
hats
themselves
offer
support,
or
do
we
rely
on
our
own
resource,
because
that
will
be
an
issue
I
it
would
have
been
nice
if
we
had
alan
to
clarify
this
now.
C
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
the
kind
of
the
role
and
the
responsibility
of
the
committee
and
I
do
think,
like
our
developers
are
in
the
best
position
to
be
assessing.
You
know
the
impact
of
a
smart
contract,
vulnerability
or
issue
within
our
ecosystem,
but
I
mean
yeah,
it
would,
it
would
depend,
but
that
is
the
responsibility
of
the
committee
and
they
could
potentially
reach
out
to
others
in
the
security
community
too.
B
G
D
Main
difference
between
this
treasury
diversification
proposal
compared
to
the
others,
is
that
it
includes
two
new
stable
coins,
or
I
guess
there
is
some
disagreement
in
the
whole
industry.
D
What
a
stable
coin
really
is,
but
the
two
new
coins
so
to
speak
is
one
of
them
is
rye,
which
is
actually
a
stable
coin
in
itself,
as
in
it
is
not
pegged
to
the
us
dollar
and
the
other
one
is
just
lusd
from
liquidy,
which
is
a
low
collateralized,
stable
coin,
which
is
pegged
to
the
us
dollar,
and
the
only
thing
I
would
really
mention
is
rye
is
kind
of
like
the
biggest
diversification
in
this
proposal,
making
up
60,
so
3
million
of
the
5
million
to
diversify,
and
the
reason
behind
that
is
also
that
we
kind
of
want
to
send
the
signal
that
we
support
projects
like
rye,
which
are
actually
really
decentralized
rather
than
just
you
know,
digitalized
us
dollar
right,
which
might
also
be
more
subject
to
regulation,
particularly
those
like
usdc
or
dye,
which
is
backed
by
a
large
amount
of
usdc.
D
C
Yeah-
and
there
is
you
know,
griez,
maybe
a
little
bit
difficult
to
understand.
One
criticism
was
that
it
maybe
does
end
up
tracking
the
price
of
eth,
which
I
honestly
don't
really
have
an
informed
opinion
on
yet
myself.
But
I
do
think
it's
important
to
remember
that,
like
yeah,
the
a
in
dao
stands
for
autonomy,
and
that
means
having
you
know,
the
ability
to
be
self-sovereign,
and
when
you
look
at
stable
coins
like
usdc
and
usdt,
there
are
blacklists.
They
are
very
centralized.
C
There
are
literally,
like
you
know,
a
small
number
of
executives
at
a
couple
companies
that
can
basically
control
those
those
assets,
and
so
I
think
we
are
sending
a
very
good
and
consistent
message
by
supporting
projects
like
liquidity
and
and
rye
for
in
their
quest
to
provide
you
know,
truly
trustless
decentralized,
stable
assets
or
stable
coins.
Whatever
you
want
to
call
them.
D
Yeah,
I
also
saw
recently
well
a
couple
of
days
ago,
maybe
yesterday,
usdt
is
actually
suing
coindesk
or
at
least
refusing
a
freedom
of
information
request,
which
is
not
really
a
good
signal.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
fun
around
tether
and
stuff,
but
you
know
if
we
do
want
to
support
decentralization.
D
One
idea
could
also
be
to
dump
some
of
the
more
extreme
centralized
ones
like
usdt
for
some
other
coin.
You
know
it's
something
we
could
maybe
think
or
talk
about.
C
That
we're
taking,
because
we
already
have
four
it
it's
a
lot
of
this-
is
hedging
right
and
diversification
is
about
hedging
risk,
securing
runway
the
fact
that
we
already
have
four
different
stable
coins
and
then
we're
adding
two
more,
even
if
some
of
them
are
centralized
they're,
it's
diversification
of
risk
right,
because
even
the
you
know
they
all
come
with
their
own
risks
right.
So
it's
good!
That's
right!.
B
It's
like
rye
is,
I
think,
everything
john
said
is
completely
accurate,
decentralized
trustless,
but
there
is
like
it
is
like
seven
months
old.
It
is
like
there
is
a
different
level
of
smart
contract
risk
because
it
hasn't
had
as
much
funds
go
through
it,
but
it's
a
very
different
type
of
risk
than
dude
in
like
office,
saying
you
can't
use
dc
or
usdt
so
like
yeah,
just
spreading.
B
B
Yeah
they've
all
been
like,
I
don't
know,
pax
came
with
their
like
were
100
cash
and
usdc
was
like,
oddly,
not
as
conservative
as
you
might
expect,
but
they
just
came
out
and
they
did
like
a
week
or
two
ago
and
outside
moving
to
like
all
cash
reserves
or
something.
But
I
think
a
lot
of
like
the
centralized
stable
coins
are
like
they're
preparing
for
their
own
10x,
but
like
for
them
to
10x.
That
means
they're
gonna
like
get
integrated
with
like
every
big
financial
institution
regulatory
body.
B
So,
like
that's,
what
they're
kind
of
focusing
on
now
is
how
can
they
scale
that
the
compliance
of
that?
But
it's
yeah,
I
think
just
who
knows,
I
think,
the
the
there
will
be
lots
of
different
options
in
the
market
going
forward
and
I
think
yeah
considering
all
of
them
and
diversifying
it.
B
Awesome
and
then
just
kind
of
lastly,
on
the
contributor
ux
front
melanie
couldn't
make
it
today,
but
you
just
want
to
give
me
an
update,
as
we
said
earlier
next
week,
we'll
have
some
discussion
about
the
dxd
best
thing
about
and
how
we
can
kind
of
get
that
squared
away
and
come
up
with
a
system
for
that
and
then.
Secondly,
then
working
on
the
dx
referral,
which
I
think
the
proposal
passed
at
the
end
of
last
week
there.
So
that's
a
new
system
there
and
yeah.
J
J
You
hear
some
like
airplane
acoustics,
but
we've
officially
come
to
an
end
of
the
search
for
our
next
marketing
lead.
As
you
know,
the
past
few
months
the
contributor
x
has
been
screening
and
conducting
any
interviews
alongside
the
blockchain
recruiting
agency
position
to
fill
this
role.
So
many
of
you
have
already
met
her
in
the
meetings
and
on
key
base,
but
if
you
haven't,
nissa
will
be
joining
us
and
leading
our
marketing
efforts.
Her
username
on
cubase
is
at
nissa
s
so
reach
out
to
her.
J
If
you
haven't
had
a
chance
to
introduce
yourself,
she
currently
has
an
active
proposal
that
just
passed
over
the
weekend
on
chain
as
well.
In
addition
position
will
be
posting
in
the
dow
talk
forum,
just
recapping
the
experiences
and
learnings
of
recruiting
for
a
dow.
You
can
all
check
that
out
to
learn
more
about
the
process
and
experience
we
had
when
it
goes
up
and
then,
like
chris
mentioned
last
week.