►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-03-03]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
deek
style
governance,
discussion,
wednesday
march
3rd
2021,
to
go
over
the
agenda
a
slightly
different
format,
I'm
trying
out
kind
of
three
different
sections
like
proposal:
roundup.
Those
are
things
that
are
like
live
on
in
a
proposal,
whether
that's
on
xti
or
mainnet,
and
then
two
on
the
horizon.
So
these
are
like
proposals
that
we're
working
on,
but
are
not
yet
formal
proposals
and
then,
like
current
happenings,
which
is
just
kind
of
everything
else
things
that
we're
checking
in
on
that.
B
So
we'll
get
to
the
proposal
roundup
in
a
little
bit,
but
just
go
over
like
the
the
current
happenings,
the
things
that
we'll
check
we'll
check
in
like
the
xdi
based
check-in
worker
onboarding
proposals.
I
want
to
make
sure
we
have
like
some
time
to
go
over
that
and
see
how
things
are
checking
in
and
then
yeah.
That's
really
the
other.
Only
thing
from
from
there
that
I'm
really
interested
in
getting
to
talk
about
the
proposal
roundup.
B
So
we
now
have
like
two
different
bases
and
we
have
to
go
over
these
things
on
both
bases
and
make
making
sure
that
we're
being
diligent
and
reviewing
both
of
those
so
to
go
over
the
mainnet
proposals.
First,
a
couple
different
worker
proposals,
as
always,
I
think,
zet
and
sky.
B
We
also
have
the
branding
and
website
from
andre
casa,
which
I
think
we've
talked
about
the
last
a
couple
times
here
and
then
we
have
two
pretty
interesting
proposals
about
getting
liquidity
into
swapper,
one
to
deposit
liquidity
into
swapper
on
xdi.
So
this
would
go
to
150
east.
B
It
will
go
to
the
multi-sig,
which
will
then
be
half
of
which
will
be
converted
to
die
and
then
both
that
die
and
wrapped
each
will
be
bridged
across
into
extine
deposited
into
dx
style
base
on
xdi
and
then
from
there
deposited
into
the
liquidity
relayer
and
then
providing
liquidity
on
swapper
there.
So
this
will
be
the
first
time
that
we're
providing
liquidity
on
xdi
swapper.
B
B
Mainnet,
and
so
this
will
take
a
hundred
eth
and
then
directed
to
the
multi-sig,
and
the
multi-state
will
actually
be
trying
out
a
new
relayer
that
has
just
been
deployed
or
is
in
the
process
of
being
deployed
and
that
will
interact
with
swapper
mainnet
and
then,
while
that
is
being
tested
by
the
multisig,
we'll
be
installing
a
new
multi-call
scheme
that
can
interact
with
this
relayer
and
then
the
ownership
of
the
relayer
and
also
the
lp
tokens
will
go
to
dxtau.
B
So
I
think
these
two
proposals
are
pretty
big
moves
in
terms
of
moving
funds
around
and
also
providing
liquidity
to
swapper.
Anyone
have
comments
or
like
questions
or
thoughts
about
those
related
to
that.
A
We
were
just
briefly
discussing
getting
some
well
trying
to
build
a
dxd
pool
on
swapper
on
xdi,
which
would
be
cool
and
john
had
mentioned-
maybe
doing
a
small
dxd
farming
campaign,
and
is
that
john?
I
just
had
a
question.
Could
we
can
do
that
because
the
real
layer
on
xdi
is
fully
open,
so
we
don't
need
to
use
the
multisig.
We
just
need
to
get
dx
xdx
dao
some
dxd
bridged
across
and
then
the
the
dow
can
actually
create
a
farming
pool,
because
we
don't
need
the
new.
We
don't
need.
C
Well,
you're
right
about
the
not
needing
multi
call
on
on
next
time,
because
there's
no
white
list
for
the
x
time,
multi
call.
So
you
don't
need
to
really
ever
install
a
new
one,
but
to
do
a
farming
pool.
We
first
need
to
well
I
mean
before
any
of
this
right.
We
need
to
release
exti
version
of
swapper,
I
believe
is
federico
here.
Yeah
federico
can
kind
of
give
us
the
latest
here.
I
believe
the
farming
may
actually
be
ready
for
x
die
in
the
next
release,
cool
and
yep.
D
Yeah
I
mean
we
can
have.
I
don't
think
the
farming
will
like
it
depends
how
we
wanna
like
what
what
we
want
to
do
if
we
want
to
maybe
have
a
first
release
with
only
the
routing
which
is
already
a
nice
feature
and
it
works
on
both.
It
would
benefit
both
xdi
and
mainnet,
and
I
still
think
I
need
some
more
time
to
work
on
the
farming.
D
Well,
you
know
the
routing
is
there
and
it's
working,
so
maybe
we
can
do
two
different
releases
that
both
add
value
so,
but
I
think
I
I'd
say
the
end
of
next
week.
Probably
the
farming
will
be
will
be
ready
depending
on
how
tests
go.
So
that's
the
the
plan,
I
think
just
like
double
releases.
A
Federico
would
it
be
weird
to
on
x,
die
release
like
the
like
the
routing
and
the
farming
together
like
because
we're
going
to
use
x
die
for
testing,
but
obviously
we
don't
want
to
break,
but
even
if
we
didn't
put
the
farming
on
main
net,
would
it
would
it
be
okay
to
like
do
the
routing
and
farming
together
on
xdi
like
and
then
actually
do
a
small,
a
small
dxd
farming
campaign
would
be
the
best
way
to
test
it
on
nextdie
I
mean,
even
if
it's
like
in
the
end
of
next
week,
that'd
be
fine,
but
is
that
a
is
that
something?
A
D
No,
we
we
can.
We
can
definitely
do
that.
We
can
have
farming
on
only
like
selected
networks,
but
point
is
that
the
front
end
is
shared
among
networks
and
right
now,
it's
a
bit
early
for
the
front
end
for
the
farming
to
be
released.
So
even
if
we
want
to
do
like
the
x-style
release
with
the
farming,
we
can
do
that.
Just
don't
expect
it
to
be
perfect
at
all.
If
we
want
to
do
it
like
early,
that's
the
the
thing.
D
So
that's
why
I
said
maybe
end
of
next
week,
we'll
have
more
a
more
like
polished
thing,
more
polish
front
end
for
farming
and
we'll
be
ready
for
another
deployment,
so
yeah.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
think
that
makes
sense
because
we're
we're
kind
of
operating
there's
a
couple
different
moving
parts
here
and
I
think,
like
one,
the
the
swapper,
the
smart
routing,
is
like
a
bait
update,
big
improvement
and
I
think
like
that,
it
really
does
kind
of
make
swapper
like
a.
It
really
improves
the
product
like
right
now,
so
I
think
that's
really
exciting
and
then
related
to
that
we're
just
starting
to
get
liquidity
into
both
xdi
swapper
and
mainnet
swapper
right.
B
These
two
proposals
will
one
is
four
days
away
the
other
six
days
away
and
then
also
you
know
if
we're
going
to
be
on
getting
the
liquidity
in
xdi,
we're
gonna
have
to
go
through
and
then
the
proposal
process
is
shorter
there,
but
we're
gonna
have
to
go
through
the
proposal
process
there.
So
I
think,
probably
at
the
earliest.
B
We
would
be
looking
at
like
middle
of
end
of
next
week,
two
about
the
first
time
we
would,
or
maybe
wednesday
or
thursday,
when
we
would
get
liquidity
into
xdi
swapper
and
then
from
there.
We
can,
like
you,
know,
start
planning
the
next,
the
next
stages,
but
I
think
both
of
these
are
just
kind
of
are
like
the
first
steps
of.
B
B
Anything
else
to
say
about
yeah
I
mean
I
guess
we
could
talk
briefly
about
what
are
the
next
proposals
after
these
right.
Maybe
that's
what
we're
we're
talking
about
if
we're
just
getting.
This
is
just
the
initial
liquidity
for
both
mainnet
and
xdy.
Basically
we're
just
doing
the
web,
the
wrapped
eve
die
pair
on
on
both
of
them
to
get
things
started,
but
presumably
we
should
probably
start
thinking
of
another
proposal
for
both
the
main
net
one
I
don't
know.
B
Maybe
we
should
wait
until
the
relay
is
there
to
really
start
doing
or
we
can
keep
diversifying
that
and
then
for
x
die.
I
think
that's
a
real
question
that
we
should
start
thinking
about
is
like
how
much
liquidity
do
we
want
to
put
in
there
and
like
in
what
pairs
and
on
and
and
promoting
what,
because,
like
so
right
now,
the
first
one
should
give
us
basically
like
the
large,
the
largest
deepest
wrapped,
eats
die
pool
on
xdi,
with
about
like
160
000
dollars
worth
of
liquidity.
B
So
we,
you
know
we
have
an
opportunity
to
do
more,
wanting
to
minimize
our
our
risk
there.
But
what
are?
What
should
we
be
doing
for
the
next
proposal
for
x,
die
swapper.
A
Just
maybe
more
depending
on
the
pools,
we're
gonna
do
more
more
flow
of
fun
and
then
plan
to
like
try
to
attract
through
farming.
When
that's
ready
in
in
a
couple
in
a
few
weeks,
it
might
be
interesting
to
do
150
east,
like
maybe
a
couple
more
of
those
just
to
get
it
to
like
more
size.
I
guess.
C
Well,
I
mean
it's
kind
of
interesting
because
it's
ecstatic,
but
I
think
where
there's
some
opportunities,
maybe
on
the
other
stable
coins,
because
there's
really
nothing
that
I've
seen
on
honey
swap
for
usdc
or
tether
rsusd
and
those
are
all
things
that
we
are
planning
to
kind
of
diversify
the
treasury
into
anyway.
So
I
think
those
would
be
the
next
steps.
B
There
will
be
maybe
some
other
liquidity
that
comes
in
as
people
are
interested
in
x
I
and
then
maybe
we
also
build
it
through
the
the
farming
stuff
so
yeah
anyway.
We
can
talk
about
that
more,
maybe
on
friday's
call,
but
just
thinking
about
the
proposal
process
for
these,
so
we
can
like
start
getting
ready
for
those
and
start
moving
on
them
before
we
need
it.
A
It
could
be
cool
to
maybe
try
to
like
make
a
really
big
dxd
stick,
pull
and
like
we
incentivize
and
also
x
type
team,
incentivizes
that
as
well.
C
All
skype,
because
I
mean
you're
familiar
with
the
easy
staking
interface
right.
A
A
For
maynet
or
for
next
time.
A
Yeah,
like
once
once
we
can
put
capital
in
or
incentivize
alongside
them,
we've
kind
of
just
been
waiting.
So,
okay,
we
should
talk
more
about,
like
specifically,
we
can
have
a
call
with
them
and
like
brainstorm,
and
we
can
come
up
with
a
few
ideas
of
what
we
would
want
to
do,
but
we've
kind
of
been
waiting
to
like
be
able
to
do
it
before
we
come
up
with.
C
A
Yeah
they're,
hopefully
soon
we'll
make
a
handful
of
like
omen
markets,
also
with
steak
as
the
collateral
they
have
one.
They
made
one
small
test
one,
but
they
had
been
waiting
for
like
us
to
push
this
next
version
so
that,
like
people
could
actually
succeed
in
markets
before
they
like
put
more
in.
I
think.
A
A
B
B
Sweet
they
kind
of
like
coming
together
at
once,
also
just
the
plug
for
the
it's
all
the
dx
stats.
It's
kind
of
coming
along
it's
cool,
because
there's
gonna
be
multiple
chain,
which
I
think
probably
like
the
first
one.
That's
that's
doing
that
and
then
yeah
I
mean
it
was
even
like
the
swapper
with
uniswap
front
end
going
down.
B
B
Okay
and
then
just
shifting
to
x
die
which
were
shifting
more
and
more
over
to
so.
I
actually
submitted
my
worker
proposal,
which
is
now
boosted,
I
think
thank
you
skye
and
yeah.
There's
also
a
I
think.
Lee
chen
lee
who's
been
working
on
the
mesa
put
his
proposal
there
and
I
yeah.
I
think
that
was
good.
I
think
with
my
proposal.
Everything
was,
as
I
said,
it
was
like
mostly
the
same.
B
B
Obviously,
since
I've
gotten
this,
since
I
will
get
this
but
yeah,
it
seems
to
be
mostly
the
same
process,
but
I
think
the
key
part
that
I
think
everyone
should
do
and
that
I
have
at
the
bottom
of
the
proposal
is
basically
just
outline
specifically
the
dxd
compensation
for
that
month
and
the
rep
compensation
for
that
month.
Just
so,
it's
documented
in
the
in
the
worker
proposal.
A
Should
others
there's
a
handful
of
people
like
pritam
and
keenan
and
others
that
will
likely
be
doing
xdi
proposals
and
I
was
kind
of
thinking
they
would
request
some
x
direction.
Some
a
lot
of
the
people
don't
have
any
xdirect
and
okay,
you
get
a
tiny
about
a
tiny
bit
for
doing
a
proposal,
but
could
they
also
just
request
either
the
rep
for
the
month
worker
proposal,
or
should
they
also
include
rep
like
the
equivalent
amount
of
rep
they
have
on
mainnet,
or
should
that
be
a
separate
proposal?
A
Like
you
specifically
didn't
request
x,
night
rep
right
right
for
a
proposal,
but
I
would
I
was
thinking
all
worker
proposals
would
request
some
x
direct,
no.
B
B
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
the
compensation
part
that
we're
focused
on
is
the
main
net
rep
that
that's
why
we
want
to
make
sure
and
like
document,
but
I
think
separate
from
that
or
rel
yeah.
I
think
separate
from
that
is
what
you're
talking
about
it's
like.
We
want
to
make
sure
people
on
xdi
have
rep
and
xdi
dx
dow
right
the
base
there
now
is
a
representation
of
what
mainnet
is,
because
that's
what
it
is.
B
A
B
B
Have
any
rep
on
xda
yeah?
I
definitely
think
anyone
should
be
able
to
claim
what
they
have
on
mainnet
yeah.
I
don't
I
mean,
because
I
I'm
more
like
worried
about
it
going
the
other
way
right,
like
the
xdi
rep
being
claimed
on
mainnet,
but
I
think
we
should
be
fine
with
anyone
that
has
claiming
xdi
rep
to
match
their
main
net
rep,
I'm
a
little
worried
about
like
the
accounting
of
all
this,
like
as
we
try
to
like
reconcile
them
but
like.
A
On
that
dev
violet
has
a
proposal
in
x
died
that
he
put
in
actually
a
while
ago,
but
we
has
been
just
sitting
there,
because
we
weren't
really
sure
what
the
plan
was.
He
he
asked
to
just
clone
his
rep
from
mainnet,
which
he
has
earned
over
the
last
four
months
onto
x,
die.
A
So
that's
a
good
example
that
that's
on
there
and
like
the
lower
regular
proposals,
that's
a
good
example
of
of
that
type
of
proposal
that
people
could
just
do
top
either
top
up
or
initiate
their
rep
on
x,
die
to
match
their
main
net
rep
at
this
point
to
at
least
get
everyone
that
more
involved
and
get
start
get
voting
on
proposals.
B
A
A
A
E
A
A
C
Yeah,
that's
that's
reasonable,
but
I
mean
the
initial
mapping
was
using
the
rep
numbers
from
mainnet
and
I
think
to
be
consistent
with
that.
It
may
make
sense
to
keep
doing
the
number
and
also
another
reason
to
do
that
is
you
could
imagine
since
x-tie
is
more
usable
or
gas
like
the
amount
of
rep
could
eventually
grow
faster
on
extine,
in
which
case
using
your
percentage
from
mainnet
might
actually
be
kind
of
unfair
to
the
people
earning
on.
You
know
their
rep
on
next
time,
like.
A
C
C
Milan,
like
fellow
did
is,
is
that's
totally
reasonable,
but
I
think
maybe
we
should
set
the
standard
that
it's
just
the
rep
number
yeah.
B
Oh,
the
actual
number
of
rep,
so
my
like
violet,
I'm
looking
right
now.
He
has
15
296
rep
0.1
rep,
which
is
one
percent
of
overall
rep.
This
is
on
main
net
and
then
he
requested
eight
thousand
two
hundred
and
like
fifty
rep
on
xdi,
because
that
represents
one
percent
there.
So,
but
when
we
map
them
out,
we
actually
used
the
numbers
on
mainnet
and
applied
them
to
xdi.
So
yeah.
I
would
guess
anyone
that's
like
mapping
it
out
should
basically
like
make
your
x
die.
B
Rep
amount
correspond
to
your
main
net
rep
amount.
So
for
some
people
this
is
like,
like
mine,
it's
a
little
confusing
because
I
got
mapped
several
months
ago,
but
I've
gotten
a
lot
of
I've
gotten
rep
rewards
since
then
that
are
not
recognized
on
there.
So
I
guess
like
if
I
was
going
to
make
a
contribution
to
equalize
them.
A
Yeah
yeah.
That
makes
a
lot
of
sense
and
it
also
naturally
inflates
away
like
the
people
that
are
no
longer
active
and
especially
on
x,
die
network.
So
people
they
didn't
map
their
rep
and
then
people
that
don't
do
anything
anymore.
A
They'll
they'll,
just
get
a
lower
they'll
have
a
much
lower
person.
They'll
have
a
lower
percentage
on
x,
die
dx
dial
than
they
would
on
mainnet
dx
dial,
yeah.
C
C
People
have
bigger
percentages,
I
mean,
and
then
hopefully
we
actually
you
know
it's
a
little
less
decentralized
from
a
percentage
standpoint
like
you
know,
people
have
bigger
chunks,
but
I
mean
in
reality,
if
the
other
people
are
inactive,
it's
not
really
that
different
and
then
hopefully,
over
time
you
know
through
activity
on
next
time.
That
does
become
more
decentralized,
yeah.
A
That's
what
I
was
proposing
this
morning
like
yeah,
so
there's
a
signal
proposal
which
I
think
chris
is
going
to
get
to
for
the
dx
ventures.
That's
on
x,
die
like
theoretically
it'd,
be
amazing
if
30
people
like
anyone,
that's
been
active
voting
in
the
last
three
months,
all
voted
on
the
proposal
just
to
see
if
we
could
do
it.
That
would
be
like
that
would
be
more
than
fifty
percent.
I
think
on
x
die
hopefully,
but
especially
if
we
top
everyone
up
to
equal
their
number
of
rep
on
x
die.
C
C
In
the
future
for
successful
people
will
be
earning
things
specifically
on
x,
dive
for
something
they
did
on
x
die
right,
and
so
I
think
maybe
a
simple
rule
to
avoid
like
confusion
in
the
future
is
just
that
if
you
have
x
like
absolute
number
rep
on
main
map,
you
can
move
your
base
rep
up
to
that
number,
but
not
like,
but
you
can't
request
like.
C
I
think
we
want
to
probably
avoid,
because
you
could
imagine
like
okay,
I
say
I
have
a
thousand
rep
on
mainnet
and
I
go
and
I
earn
500x
direct
doing
something
on
next
time.
Like
I
could
now
I
could
maybe
be
like.
Oh
I
want
my
thousand
may
never
wrap
in
addition
to
the
500.
Like
I
don't
know,
I
think
we
should
avoid
the
complexity
of
that
and
just
kind
of
have
like
a
simple
like
you
can
always
get
like
at
least
your
midnight
rep.
C
You
know
what
I'm
saying
like
we
just
have
like
this
simple
one
way
like
you
can
sync
your
main
error
up
to
that.
But
if
you
start
earning
beyond
that
on
x-tie,
then
like
that's
like
whatever
right
like,
they
should
diverge.
G
A
The
so
as
chris
as
chris
did
I,
he
was
reporting
that
he
earned.
He
should
be
earning
0.166,
mainnet,
rep,
right
and
so
those
are
records
that
are
in
worker
proposals
on
xdi,
and
there
has
to
be
once
per
quarter
or
once
per
six
months,
probably
once
per
quarter
a
top
up
of
all
workers.
Mainnet
rep.
In
order
to
to
make,
though,
make
their
mainnet
rep
hole
because
main
net
rep
is
still
the
truth
right.
Okay,.
C
A
C
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
there
there
is
not
a
single
source
of
truth.
There's
gonna
be
divergence
of
the
bases,
rep
accounting
versus
the
mainnet,
but
there
are
certain
things
that
we
want
to
have
earn
mainnet
wrap
like
worker
proposals
right,
so
that
we're
just
kind
of
doing
the.
G
Worker
proposal
next
time
yeah,
but
then
we
will
need
that
people
do
for
the
worker
proposal
and
they
they
use
a
separate
address.
So
it's
I
think
it's
quite
complicated
anyway,
because
you
say
that
people
work
on
x-tie
and
then
they
get
x-tie
rap.
But
then
they
don't
have
the
same.
So
if
he
going
to
change
to
tokenomics
and
government's
0.2,
then
it's
it's
strange.
So
it's
less
birth
than
or.
G
G
C
So
I
think
it's
as
I
understand
it.
We've
discussed
this
a
little
bit
before
is
that
they
are
going
to
diverge
right
and
we're
not
going
to
be
worrying
about
trying
to
make
them
the
same.
They're,
naturally
going
to
diverge.
The
only
thing
where
we're
kind
of
updating
mainnet
with
here
is
worker
proposal
rep,
and
you
can
think
of
it
as
like.
What
we
really
should
be
doing
is
the
proposals
on
mainnet,
but
we
want
to
save
the
gas
so.
C
G
This
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
but
yeah
it's
how
it
is.
It
just
adds
a
lot
of
complexity
in
a
way
because
people
don't
need
to
yeah.
You
have
to
have
to
calculate
how
many
yeah,
in
absolute
terms,
how
many
rep
you
get
on
x,
die
but
based
on
mainnet.
C
C
Well
so
one
thing:
maybe
we
should
sort
out
right
is
if
people
are
doing
their
worker
proposals
on
x9
to
get
paid
they're
getting
paid
regularly
the
next
day
right,
like
once
a
month
once
every
two
weeks,
whatever
but
they're,
not
they're
getting.
They
can
note
the
amount
of
rep
they've
earned
in
those
proposals,
but
it
does
get
a
little
confusing
with
the
percent
right,
because,
yes,
percentages.
G
A
Chris
chris
laid
that
out
in
his
ex
die
proposal
where
he
actually
wrote
the
percentage
times
the
total
current
mainnet
rep
and
and
came
up
with
a
hard
number
of
mainnet
rep
that
is
included,
but
I
don't
there's
like
a
lot
of
people
that
are
probably
owed
rep
from
the
past.
Like
martin,
I
think-
and
I
don't
know
if
we
have
records
of
total
rep
at
do-
is
there
like
a?
Can
you
look
up
how
much
rep
there
was
in
dx
dow
like
three
months
ago?
Is
that
possible?
B
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
so
so,
depending
on
when
you've
this
doesn't,
I
think,
we've
people
have
conditioned
themselves
to
not
do
this,
but
if
you
vote
before
something
is
boosted,
a
percentage
of
your
rep
is
actually
like
locked
up
and
that
actually
changes
the
total
amount
of
rep.
C
So
you
may
actually
not
when
you're
looking
at
the
number
of
rep
that
people
have,
it
may
not
actually
be
the
real
amount
of
rep,
because
some
of
their
rep
may
be
locked
into
proposals
that
they
voted
on
or,
and
some
of
it
just
may
not
be
like
it
could
be
just
sitting
there
waiting
to
be
redeemed
too,
because
they
haven't
wait.
Goose
is
saying
it
is
the
actual
value.
What
do
you
mean.
H
C
B
So
I
I
completely
agree
that
this
is
confusing,
as
you
can
see
it's
like,
because
the
wrap
is
confusing
like
at
the
not
even
the
base
the
base
level
is
confusing.
I
think
there
are
a
couple
things
that
we're
thinking
of
here.
So
one
really
three
things,
I
think,
just
to
kind
of
sum
it
up
here,
one
we
need
to
make
sure
every
mainnet
rep
address.
Mainnet
rep
has
the
same
amount
of
rep
on
other
bases
that
we
have.
B
If
you
have
mainnet
rep,
you
should
have
rep
on
any
other
dx
style
base,
and
that
is
something
that
we
we
could
have.
So
that's
the
first.
It's.
C
B
Yeah
something
yeah,
it's
kind
of
like
a,
I
don't
know
who
the
best
passport
to
have
but
and
then
the
second
is.
We
need
to
have
a
once
a
quarter
reconciliation.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
once
a
quarter
and
we
should
aim
to
do
that
in
like
a
month
or
two.
I
guess
for
the
first
one,
maybe
for
april,
that
gives
the
rep
rewards
that
we're
not
giving
through
worker
proposals
and
reconciles
them
and.
C
B
Yeah
and
then
just
the
third
thing,
I'm
gonna
create
a.
I
think.
It's
a
spreadsheet,
we've
seen
a
spreadsheet.
That's
like
how
much
like,
what's
my
worker
level
commitment
and
how
much
rep
am
I
getting,
and
you
could
even
like,
because
I
actually
did
this
when
I
think
that
was
calculating
his
rep
in
the
past
and
I
just
like
ballpark
something
you
know.
I
just
did
what
we
had
like
about
this
much
rep
at
this
time.
B
Multiplied
out,
so
we
should
be
able
to
just
calculate
for
people,
so
inputs
are
like
yeah,
the
rep
rewards,
and
they
can
just
paste
that
on
the
bottom
of
every
proposal,.
C
Because
as
it's
important
because
the
rep
changes
right,
so
you
want
to
have
that
amount
changing
over
time,
but
it's
co.
It
causes
a
lot
of
like
accounting
like
weirdness
right,
because
then
it
actually
matters
like
when
you're
doing
the
percentage,
like
you
know
like
when
you
make
your
proposals,
you
get
this
problem
now.
If
you
didn't
do
it
in
the
past,
then
what
are.
A
You
actually
owed
chris,
like
chris
solved
that
problem
exactly
in
his
xdi
worker
proposal.
He
just
put
the
actual
amount
based
on
the
current.
If
everyone
does
that,
it's
easy
going
forward
for
worker
proposals,
the
only
thing
is
we
need
to
like
martin
always
didn't
do
his
rep
two
months
ago.
We
just
need
to
have
an
estimate
or
look
up
how
much
total
rep
there
was
at
that
point,
so
the
past
ones.
A
We
can
do
some
calculations,
but
as
long
as
you
do
what
chris
did
going
forward-
and
you
put
when
you
do
your
proposal-
you
have
to
put
this
in
your
in
your
ex
that
proposal.
You
have
to
put
a
rep
amount
and
as
long
as
you
just
calculate
percentage
times,
main
net
rep
at
that
time,
you'll
have
a
record
of
it.
I
think
right.
C
B
C
B
Yeah,
I
I
think
it's
an
interesting
idea
but
like
because
it
is
confusing,
but
then
we
do
have
to
change
it
and
then
put
someone
with
the
wrong
number.
I'm
not
I'm
not
opposed
to
it,
but
it
just
yeah
the.
A
C
Yeah,
I
mean
that's
the
beauty
of
the
percentage
and
I
think
why
we
have
it.
I'm
just
saying
it
comes
with
other
headaches,
though
right
like
what
is
it
actually
or
like?
Are
people
technically
owned,
more
rep,
because
a
bunch
of
people
didn't
request
rep
already,
and
so
the
reps
should
be
higher,
like
I
don't
know,.
B
It
gets
weird
right
like
yeah,
I
think
so,
just
martin.
I
I
want
to
like
make
sure
that
we
can.
We
have
some
clarity
in
the
short
term.
We
can
kind
of
like
get
make
sure
people
are
are
getting
through
this
process
now
and
then
maybe
we
can
figure
out
like
how
to
make
some
of
these
adjustments
on
that.
B
I
think
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
a
like
a
spreadsheet
that
does
like
a
calculator
of
this
but
like
what
are
in
terms
of
like
what
we
can
do
right
now
to
make
to
make
it
easier.
What
what?
What
are
you?
What
are
you
thinking
or
any
anyone
else?
That's
like
you
know
about
to
submit
the
work
of
proposal,
orders
thinking
about
these
things
outside
of
the
rep
award.
B
What
else?
What
should
we
be
thinking
about.
F
B
So
that's
a
good
point.
Actually,
the
two
things
on
that
are
one.
This
is
part
of
it.
Having
a
swapper,
weth
pool
will
help
with
that
and
then
two
I
wanna
do.
Another
x
died
authors.
Another
funding
of
x
die
in
the
next
like
day
or
two,
and
I
think
we
should
have
west
in
there
for
that.
Just
so
that
the
xdi
base
has
has
some
somewhat
cool.
C
Are
we
for
vesting
txd?
Is
the
idea
to
also
move
bursting
dxd
to
extend.
A
Well,
if
we,
if
we
had
dxd
x,
dxd
or
in
in
xdx,
dow
and
and
and
zeppelin
investing
contracts
were
on
x,
die,
it
would
be
super
cheap
and
easy,
but
we,
I
thought
we
weren't
doing
that,
because
we
were
waiting
for
the
block
rocket
new.
So.
C
That
was
the
other
thing
I
was
going
to
do
is
block
market
is
still
working
out,
actually
have
a
call
with
them
tomorrow,
and-
and
so
we
in
the
like,
I
said,
I
think,
there's
still
even
on
xdi
there's
still
some
like
ux
improvements.
We
can
get
from
this
right,
basically
save
people,
the
calculations
or
whatever,
and
reduce
it
to
like
clicking
a
button
on
the
on
the
payroll
interface.
A
I
Yeah,
like
another
idea,
would
be
to
like
change
the
duration
of
or
like
the
amount
like.
Basically,
the
d
star
is
kind
of
committing
six
months
of
vested
dxd
up
front,
but
can
always
like
take
it
back
right.
I
B
Yeah,
I
I
think
like
these
should
be
considered.
I
think
we
should
wait
for
block
rocket
and
what
they're
producing,
if
that's
an
easier
system,
I
think
like
yeah,
and
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
people
can
get
paid
cheaply
and
I
think,
like
the
eth
west
die
payment
is
the
most
important
thing
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
at
least
have
like
a
system
that
people
are
comfortable
with
doing
that
and
then
adding
things.
On
top
of
that,
I
think
one
really
important.
A
If
you
don't
want
to
have
money,
locked
up
yourself
on
x
die
because
like
what,
if
something
happened
to
x
dot,
but
if
you
start
locking
up
two
year
best
thing
based
on
x,
die
contracts
that
you
don't
have
a
choice
anymore
as
a
worker.
I
think
it's
better
to
keep
anything
long-term,
that
you
can't
immediately
move
back
across
a
bridge,
even
though
something
could
happen.
I
think
you
anything
longer
term.
I
think
you
want
to
keep
on
a
mainnet
even
at
a
higher
cost.
C
And
the
payroll
system
that
block
market
is
working
will
help
a
lot
with
that,
because
then
we
don't
have
to
deploy
a
new
investing
contract
for
every
pay
period.
A
B
Cool
we'll
keep
moving
along
sky.
Do
you
wanna
the
xdi
proposal
for
dx
ventures?
Do
you
wanna
talk
about
that.
A
Oh
yeah,
so
it's
it's
really
just
well.
We
first
proposed
the
idea.
Three
weeks
ago
we
had
some
discussion.
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
around
potential
investments.
We
also
were
waiting
for
the
xdi
authorization
so
that
we
could
do
this.
A
A
If
you
have
xdi
rep
and
then
the
idea
would
be
if
this
is
approved,
it
didn't
have
any
actual
investments
in
this,
but
the
idea
would
be
to
kind
of
write
up,
write
a
post
and
announce
this
to
the
world
which,
even
though
people
could
come
and
see
this
anyway
right,
but
and
ideally
also
include
one
or
maybe
two
initial
investments
as
part
of
the
announcement
and
launch
of
it
and
there's
a
there's,
a
handful
of
projects
we're
talking
about,
but
at
the
same
time
it
could
take
more
than
like
a
couple
weeks
to
like
get
those
deals
done.
A
A
If
a
year
from
now
and
actually
pope
and
I
were
talking
about
tammy-
and
I
were
talking
about
like
potentially
putting
a
an
arbitration
clause-
maybe
using
claros
in
the
actual
terms
of
that
of
that
proposal
as
well,
so
that,
like
six
months
from
now
when
the
tokens
exist
and
they're
supposed
to
deliver
tokens
to
dxdao
like
there
is
public
reputation
that
if
they
don't
do
and
they
don't
perform
on
their
end,
like
it
would
hurt
their
reputation
and
there's
a
arbitrator
clause
as
well.
A
So
that's
like
the
overall
process
of
how
I
think
these
things
would
work
and
the
only
way
to
to
learn
is
to
like
do
one
we
need
to
like
do
one
once
we
have
this
approved.
We
need
to
just
do
the
first
one
and
see
how
it
goes,
but
there
is
a
little
bit
of
trust
in
these
things,
because
it's
just
an
on-chain
contract
agreement
between
two
parties,
but
dx
dow's
been
doing
that
for
now
over
a
year
and
it
seems
to
work
right.
It's
a
new
way
of
doing
business
deals.
I
guess
yeah.
F
J
Sorry,
no
I'm
just
gonna
say
I
think
this
is
a
really
cool
opportunity.
I
was
telling
sky
and
others
for
us
to
kind
of
even
beyond
this,
if
there
are
any
other
at
any
other
times
on
chain
treasuries,
or
something
like
that
where
we
could
try
to
even
do
something
more
smart
contract
related
and
have
it
actually
built
into
like
the
parameters
of
the
agreement
built
into
a
smart
contract.
J
So,
though,
we're
going
to
start
off
with
more
just
like
a
written
contract,
it
could
be
interesting
to
see
how
this
this
grows
in
the
future.
That's
all.
C
J
I
I
think
I
think
skye
mentioned
that
I
was
I
know.
Claros
has
been
something
we
used
for
omen,
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
any
other
arbitrators
that
we
would
be
interested
in
working
with,
but
it
is
kind
of
fun
to
think
of
the
idea
that
you
know
it's
all
within
the
ethereum
world.
A
C
A
J
Luckily,
especially
if
they're
dealing
with,
if
they're
dealing
with
vc
financing
as
well,
which
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
the
projects
we've
so
far
talked
to-
are
that
this
is
just
very
normal
for
especially
for
the
pers
the
entity
giving
the
money
they
usually
not
always,
but
they
usually
dictate
the
forum.
That
means
even
like
you
know,
of
course,
for
traditional
courts.
That
would
be
the
lo.
J
You
know
if
it's
in
california
state
court
or
federal
court
in
new
york
whatever,
and
if
it's
going
to
be
arbitration,
all
that
stuff's,
usually
dictated
by
the
finance
here.
A
Yeah,
the
only
one
obstacle
which
we
will
see
if,
if
we
encounter
this
and
hopefully
the
projects
that
are
excited
to
take
dx
dao,
you
know
partnership.
Investment
would
be
like
if
a
vc
is
also
investing
like,
for
example,
radical
a
vc
might
be
like.
I
don't
like.
I
don't
want
my
portfolio
company
to
take
that
type
of
non-legal,
non-real
world
legal
agreement
with
some
weird
arbitration
like,
and
they
projects
may
get
pushed
back
from
vcs,
but
we'll
only
know
until
we
try
right
it's
if
I'm
a
vci
typical
of
s
right.
J
J
Usually
the
question
is,
if
there's
some
sort
of
order
of
operations
regarding
the
return
on
investment.
So
if
there's
a
certain
vc
before
us
and
things
like
that,
but
technically
we
are
considered
a
general
partnership.
I
would
say
in
a
traditional
court.
So
it's
not
that
there's
no
legal
entity,
it's
just
that
we're
like
a
de
facto
legal
entity,
meaning
we're
not
registered
anywhere.
J
B
Investment
cool
and
I
liked
justin's
guy's
proposal.
The
things
I
liked
about
is
kind
of
like
the
next
step.
It
was
like
kind
of
you
know
imagining
how
there
will
need
to
be
two
proposals
and
how
things
will
flow.
I
think
it's
a
good
habit
to
get
into
of
like
predicting
or
kind
of
foreshadowing
future
proposals
or
or
actions.
B
Cool
anything
else
I
know
we're
running
out
on
time.
I
wanted
to
just
talk
about
the
buy
back.
I
go
up
there
on
the
buyback.
Tammy
has
been
working
on
some
things
here
and
so
tim.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
kick
off
with
that.
There's
a
couple
different
documents
and
things
we're
trying
to
do
to
get
ready
for
this,
and
so
it
basically
be
some
type
of
proposal
that
lays
out
a
couple
different
things
before
getting
into
the
actual
like
technical
proposal
to
actually
buy
it
so
tammy.
J
Yeah,
you
know
I
thought
about
sharing
my
screen,
but
it's
just
a
lot
of
written
stuff
and
I
don't
think
it's
gonna
process
very
well
at
this
point,
so
I
will
share
the
documents
on
our
main
key
base
before
we
post
them
on
dow
talk.
But
the
main
points
are
that
we're
going
to
be
starting
a
token
buyback
program
soon,
once
we
know
that
the
tax
ready-
and
I
think
that
the
announcement
will
happen
one
week
on
you
know,
it'll
be
on
dow
talk
for
just
the
normal
process.
J
We
do
for
all
of
our
proposals.
Saying
hey
we're
gonna
put
this
proposal
up
on
chain
for
a
token
buyback
program,
we're
buying
approximately
one
million
dollars
in
dye,
and
it's
going
to
be
over
a
six-month
period.
The
the
announcement
just
walks
through
all
the
discussions
that
we've
had
regarding
the
need
for
the
buyback.
Why
we
think
it's
a
good
time
to
do
the
buyback
and
why
we
think
we
have
ample
treasury
resources
and
we're
in
a
good
financial
position
to
do
the
buyback,
yeah
so
I'll.
J
I
can
actually
put
that
in
key
base
or
something
like
that
very
soon.
J
There's
two
there's
really
just
technical
questions,
though,
that
I've
run
into
that
I've
talked
with
chris
about,
and
I
think
some
of
them
actually
were
addressed
at
the
developers
call
earlier
this
week.
But
one
thing
I
do
want
to
know
is
what
exchanges
we're
going
to
be
buying
dxd
from?
Is
it
just
going
to
be
swapper?
Is
it
going
to
be
uniswap
swapper
sushi,
swap?
J
I
would
like
to
list
that
in
the
announcement
so
once
we
know
that
that
would
be
great.
What
else
yeah?
That's
that's
really
the
main
thing.
That's
the
big
detail
that
I'm
missing.
I
think
everything
was
explained
with
how
the
price
works
as
far
as
determining
the
price
through
the
price
oracle,
and
then
I
think
chris
did
you
have
any
other
questions.
J
I
know
we
we
kind
of
discussed
how
the
our
goal
of
trying
to
do
an
average
daily
trading
volume
of
about
25
percent
of
the
circulating
supply
of
being
traded
of
dxd
a
day
for
the
the
course
of
the
buyback
program,
which
we
said
was
probably
50
thousand
dollars
and
die
between
kind
of
more
the
trusted
exchanges,
which,
of
course,
swapper
uniswap
sushi
swap
balancer.
But
are
those
going
to
be
the
exchanges
that
you
know
we're
actually
going
to
be
using
really
makes
that
number
somewhat
fluctuate?
J
So
it's
it's
a
I'm
wondering
if
the
real
air
is
actually
going
to
be
able
to
technically
work
that
way.
So
those
are
really
the
two
questions
and
just
really,
we
have
all
the
documents
ready.
It's
just
a
matter
of
just
meeting
equally
with
the
tech
and
getting
the
proposal
passed
and
we're
good
to
go.
C
So
what
has
been
developed
so
far
is
hypnosis
protocol
relayer,
which
would
put
a
limit
order
in
on
gnosis
protocol,
so
that
would
not
enable
like
direct
buys
from
on-chain
liquidity
pools,
but
presumably
people
would
you
know
trade
into
it.
So
we
could
stick
with
that.
If
people
feel
like
that's
not
sufficient,
I
mean
I
think
we
could
probably
develop
another
one
which
does
the
transvia
either
one
inch
or
the
individual
exchanges.
B
There
is
a
lot
of
dxt
in
mesa,
or
I
guess,
like
those
protocol,
that's
deposited,
I
think,
there's
like
800
dxd,
that's
that's
there.
So
I
mean
I
think
it
would
be
cool
to
use
or
products.
Dog
food
is
a
little
bit,
and
so
I
got
I'm
definitely
leaning
towards
like
the
noses
protocol
component,
but
I
definitely
understand
that,
like
one
inch,
probably
would
you
know
provide
like
a
quick
execution,
but
I
think
for
this
like
it
says,
especially
it's
a
limit
order.
B
You
can
just
like
put
it
out
there
and
like
the
market,
can
come
and
get
it.
It's
not
about
like
execute
like
really
transacting.
C
G
But
then
sorry,
maybe
another
thing
is
we
don't
know
how
long
diagnosis
is
running
mesa
because
yeah,
if
we
change
the
brand,
then
there's
no
interface,
so
it's
old
interface
and
they
have
run.
They
have
running
costs
for
the
matching
of
mesa,
the
old
mesa-
and
I
don't
know
how
long
they
will
support
it.
So
how.
G
I
Martin
pepperman-
and
he
said
until
gpv2
is
not
out
in
public
gpv1
is
supported.
Okay,
but
like
based
on
our
experience.
It
is
smart
to
be
in
touch
with
them,
just
because
we
need
to
tell
them
that
the
solver
needs
to
work
once
the
limit
order
reaches
on
chain.
G
J
Yeah,
it's
whatever
you
think
will
be
the
the
smoothest
to
start
off
with
I
you
can
all
read.
I
think
it
takes
two
or
three
minutes
to
read
through
the
announcement,
but
I
do
have
you
know
something
in
there
of
course
saying
that
if
something
changes
we
will
have
to
adjust
accordingly.
So
that
would
be
an
example
of
that.
C
B
Money
I
mean,
I
think,
from
like
a
process
perspective,
it's
easier
if
it's
a
limit
order,
because
it's
like
we
are
putting
in
this
order
like
come
and
take
and
leave
it,
and
we
are
like
agreeing
and
voting
on
that
and
we're
like
putting
it
out
there,
but
that
I
don't
know
if
we
like
know
what
that
order
should
be
and
like
whether
that'll
like
eat
it,
eat
everything
up
or
like
how
that
will
work.
B
I
Yeah
definitely
limit
order
because
it's
like
we
are
on
the
safe
side
temmie.
I
think
like
the
way
we
are
going
to
approach
it
is
anyway
like
okay,
we
set
aside
one
mil
usd
and
like
we
will
create
those
limit
orders,
according
like
market
conditions,
to
end
senders,
correct,
like
I
think,
by
using
just
gp
v1.
It's
just
like
a
way
safer
and
calmer
process
of
just
like
buying
back
our
stuff
over
a
longer
period
of
time.
G
In
a
way,
it's
a
perfect
use
case
for
the
easy
auction
algorithm
in
a
way,
but
yeah
it's
not
ready.
Maybe,
but
maybe
because
you
know
you
just
make
an
auction
with
with
the
die
and
then
you
say
we
accept
take
step
for
it
and
then
people
will
beat
takes
t
for
the
die
and
then
you'll
be.
G
Yeah,
but
it's
just
that
it,
it
would
also
be
a
use
case
for
the
easy
auction
algorithm
in
a
way.
If
you
just
do
it
all
the
way,
because
it
should
then
get
to
the
market
price
people
will
buy
the
stay
on
the
market
and
then
sell
it
to
against
the
die,
but
as
the
product
is
not
ready.
So
this
is
not
an
option.
A
One
other
option
is
to
empower
the
multi-sig
to
like
transact
the
buyback
like
and
there's
a
lot
of
flexibility
there,
because
then
you
can,
you
can
act
when
the
time
is
right.
You
can
do
different
things.
You
can,
I
think,
leave
limit
orders.
You
can
use
one
inch
you
could
just
do
clips
of
by
buying
back.
I
mean
it's
an
option
if,
if
the
other
thing's
too
difficult
or
something
doesn't
work.
J
Yeah,
if,
let's
first
explore
doing
it
as
automated
as
possible
within
a
set
area
of
parameters,
because
that's
what
I
I
do
like
that
element
of
how
we
can
do
it
and
then,
if
for
some
reason,
there's
some
technicality
that
won't
work
for
a
limit
order
that
that's
an
option.
But
I
I
don't
consider
it
to
be
ideal.
A
Yeah,
like
I
think
when,
when
these
buybacks
happen
in
the
in
the
corporate
world
financial
world,
like
the
company,
is
hiring
an
investment
bank
to
to
execute
the
buyback
within
a
outlined
structure
right.
It's
like
they
don't
do
it
every
day
at
9am
like
once
a
week
or
something
like
there's
a
there's,
a
team,
that's
hired
to
execute
the
buyback
and
there's
some
strategy
involved
in
that
as
well,
but
it's
within
parameters
that
are
outlined
and
set
by
the
company
and
its
shareholders
right.
J
That's
right
and
usually
that's
the
thing
is
it
gets
me
into
these
other
areas
of
complication
that
I
was
kind
of
happy
to
avoid,
which
is
like.
Then
the
multi-stick
almost
feels
like
a
broker,
and
then
it's
these
questions
that
you,
when
you
take
out
human
involvement,
I
don't
have.
We
don't
have
to
deal
with
because
we
have
it
programmed
into
our
smart
contract,
which
is
what
I
liked
about
it.
B
Think
this
is
one
of
those
examples
where,
like
the
constraints
are
actually
like
making
us
build
something
that
we
like
have
to
use.
That's
better.
So
I'm
just
hearing
that
the
the
we
wanna
do
a
limit
order,
and
so
we're
gonna
do
a
limit
order.
Then
we're
gonna,
that's
basically
using
gnosis
protocol.
B
I
did
just
briefly
wanna.
I
did
like
some
brief
calculations
on
like
what
this
would
look
like
here,
so
if
we
were
doing
50k
clips
and
so
here
what
I
have
is
like
this
is
the
current
prices.
B
Here
I
have
I
built
in
a
basically
a
.006
like
stair
escalator
increase
for
each
50k.
Oh,
don't
see
the
screen.
B
B
That's
all
the
dxd,
that's
off
the
market
right,
and
you
can
see
here
that
this
would
be
a
million
dollars
here
and
that
would
get
us
a
lot
of
txd
3304
and
that
would
assume
like
a
price
of
a
dxd
price
of
like
407
407
dollars
still
using
today's
east
prices,
but
really
like
the
the
since
the
sun
seeks
out
so
much
east
really
like
the
key
factor
is
the
dxd
eth
price,
and
so
this
would
like
assume
that
that
would
rise
to
0.253.
B
But
you
can
still
see
here.
This
is
still
a
lot
of
dxd.
B
This
would
be
three
percent
of
the
eth
in
the
treasury
and
then
6.7
of
the
current
dxd
circulating
supply,
which
is
like
49,
000
or
or
something.
So.
I
think
this
could
actually
look
a
little
high
and
I
don't
know
if
we
would
like
end
up
getting
to
this
and
who
knows
what
the
market
would
do
if
this
was
is
like
how
it
would
react
in
different
ways,
but
I
think
we
want
to
have
some
idea
of
what
we're
doing
just
so,
we
can
adjust
or
have
a
plan.
F
Yeah,
I
think
you're
not
taking
into
consideration
like
the
front
running.
That's
gonna
happen,
probably
right.
F
Yeah,
it's
I
mean
it's
guessing.
My
other
question
would
be
what
like
we're
gonna
do
limit
order.
Have
we
determined
where
we
set
the
limit
order
at.
F
B
We
would
the
the
two
ways
we
have
it
is
the
relayer
itself
could
use
the
time
weighted
average
price
of
the
unit
swap
and
balancer
arrays,
just
the
unit
swap
pool,
and
so
that
we
could
use
that
to
place
the
limit
order.
Alternatively,
we
could,
and
then
that
would
like
you
could
use
that-
that
time
at
average
price,
but
then
set
upper
and
lower
bounds
on
what
that
could
be.
B
Alternatively,
we
could
set
the
price
itself
in
in.
A
Chris
chris,
like
buyback,
gets
approved,
buyback
starts,
the
xd
price
goes
to
800..
What
do
you
do
on
day?
Two
right
like
these?
These
orders
have
to
be
dynamic.
It
like
okay,
we're
gonna,
still
buy
back,
but
it's
just
gonna
be
a
higher
price,
so
we're
gonna
get
less
dxd
but
we're
still
gonna
spend.
The
plan
is
still
to
spend
a
million
dollars
of
buying
back
dxd,
correct.
J
Exactly
that's
part
of
it
and
also
well
what
I'm
hoping
okay.
So
this
is
another
question
I
have
we
can
we
should.
You
know,
try
to
randomize
this
as
much
as
possible
that
that
we
can,
because
six
months
we
actually
to
do
this.
We
don't
need
every
day
of
six
months
in
order
to
do
the
buyback.
I
think
it's
20
days
or
something
like
that
for
50
000
die
a
day,
so
I
mean
obviously
someone
can
figure
it
out
if
they
want.
J
Aside
from
that,
though,
I
just
lost
my
train
of
thought.
There
was
one
other
thing
I'll
think
of
it
and
get
back
to
you
guys,
yeah.
A
C
J
Worth
yes,
okay,
that
was
what
that
was
part
of
the
the
thought
process
that
I
lost.
So
we
need
yeah.
If
we
can,
we
do
need
to.
I
thought
the
oracle
had
something
in
it
where
it
it
created
bounds
based
on
the
vault,
like
the
price
average
price
from
other
markets.
C
C
I
mean
we
could
check
right.
Like
you
could
say,
I
mean
mechanically.
We
could
put
in
a
limit
order
at
the
current
price
or
the
current
price,
plus
whatever
or
minus
whatever.
Oh,
but
there's.
If
you
put
in
a
limit
order,
there's
no
guarantee
that
you're
actually
going
to
fulfill
it
right,
like
the
price,
could
move.
J
Yeah,
but
actually
that's
that
actually
is
kind
of
nice
because
we
like
I
said
it
could
take
20.
You
know
20.
If
we
20
days
six
month
period,
there
is
a
bit
of
some
some
level
of
controlling
controlling
the
space
and
then
we
always
adjust
weekly
based
on
what
the
you
know.
The
trading
volume
is
the
amount
we're
going
to
be
buying
and
also
the
price,
so
it
doesn't
need
to
be
set
in
stone
for
forever
in
the
future,
but
it
just
kind
of
responds
incrementally
to
what
the
market
is
doing.
A
Yeah
you
you're,
going
to
you're
going
to
say
you're
going
to
want
to
say
dx
dow
thinks
dxd
is
cheap.
It
has
it's
implementing
this
buyback
plan
to
buy
up
to
a
mil
up
to
a
million
dollars
of
dxd
over
the
next
six
months
and
like
not
much
more
detail
than
that.
Maybe
maybe
something
about
like
once.
Every
cut
no
more
than
twice
a
week
or
something
like
that
of
clips
of
x,
but
that's
there
should
be
there
internally
or
in
the
buyback,
maybe
just
internally,
maybe
not
written
down.
A
There
should
be
like
at
some
price,
like
eight
hundred
dollars
per
dxd,
like
the
program
may
pause
right
so
like
the
limit
is
not
on
like
each
specific
order,
which
can
be
executed
at
market
order
or
a
limit
order
at
the
time.
But
there
should
be
at
some
point:
does
dx
down
not
think
eath
is
cheap
or
dxd
is
cheap
anymore,
and
what?
When?
What
is
that
price.
J
Right,
so
the
conversation
has
been
looking
at
the
our
market
cap
book
value,
for
you
know
what
we
consider
under,
but
we
could
all
you
know
we're.
We
are
significantly
under
that
amount,
so
we
could
consider
it
some
sort
of
percent
of
market
cap
or
book
value
and
again
for
the
relay
for
the
actual
market
price
it
like
like
with
I.
I
think
this
is
just
more
my
sense
than
oh.
J
This
is
how
it
should
be
done,
but
it's
for
the
average
daily
trading
volume,
it's
usually
an
average
each
week's
average
of
average
daily
trading
volume.
You
take
those
for
the
past
four
weeks
and
you
you
add
those
together.
You
know
that's
that
average
of
the
past
month
is
how
you
get
to
your
usual
average
daily
trading
volume.
That's
the
calculation
you
get
there.
J
B
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
it
is
incredibly
difficult
to
predict
how
the
market
will
react
to
this
like
this
is
what's
really
like.
The
trouble
with
this
is
like.
How
do
we
provide?
How
do
we
like
establish
some
system
of
forward-looking
guidance
that
accounts
for
potential
changes
in
the
market,
that
you
know
the
actions
we're
taking
are
going
to
influence
future
market
action?
So
it's
really
really
hard
to
do
that.
I
think
we
should
be
thinking
about
this
in
terms
of
the
dxd
eth.
B
The
dhd
price
partially
because,
like
60,
could
go
to
800,
but
that
could
be
because
eth
goes
to
like
3
000
or
4
000
or
something
right,
and
I
think
that
would
that
would
change
the
circumstances.
I
think
tammy's
point
about
the
book
value
would
carry
here
because
then
the
you're
only
looking
at
that
that
accounts
for
the
east
value
and
the
the
treasury.
What
if
we
just
committed
to
like
buying
50k
of
dxd
at
a
like
dxd
to
eat
price
that
just
goes
incrementally
up
by
like
0.005.
B
So
right
now
it's
like
0.12
dxd
per
eth
and
we
just
said
we're
gonna
like
buy
50k
at
point,
one,
two:
five
dxd
eth
and
then
in
like
two
weeks,
we're
gonna,
buy
it
at
we're:
gonna
buy
50k
usd
at
0.13
geeks
to
eat
and
then,
like
the
next
week
later,
we
do
0.135
east
and
we
just
like
commit
to
that
for
a
certain
amount
of
time.
J
B
B
So
I'm
saying
like,
can
we
put
out
specific
orders
that
we're
going
and
signal
specific
orders
that
we're
going
to
execute
on
over
like
a
month
time
period,
and
I
think
the
easiest
way
to
do
that
is
having
like
committing
to
a
dxd
eth
price,
and
I
think
that
that
will
obviously
be
like
front
runnable,
but
it
will
also
like
maintain
the
it'll
it'll,
prevent
it
from
being
like
exploited,
because
it's
like
no
we're
only
going
to
buy
like
at
0.14
eth
this
week
right
or
something
like
that.
C
Yeah
another
way
we
could
frame
this,
and
I
think
it
was
one
of
the
ways
we
had
discussed
it
before
is.
If
the
goal
here
is
basically
to
establish
some
kind
of
a
floor
on
the
price
like
put
a
hand
under
the
market
price,
we
can
say
the
pro
I
mean
with
all
the
stuff
that
tammy's
already
got
in
there.
It's
like
dxl
will
buy
market
by
up
to
a
thousand
sorry
up
to
a
million
dollars
worth
of.
C
C
J
I
think
that's
yeah,
exactly
and
that's
I
mean
that's
our
justification,
partial,
it's
part
of
it,
aside
from
the
swapper
needs
and
all
of
that,
but
the
reason
why
we're
buying
it
right
now
is
it's
a
good
deal.
So
when
it
becomes
not
a
good
deal,
we
need
to
you
know
change
our
decision-making
process,
so
up
to
30
percent
is
fine.
J
I
tried
to
share
my
screen
with
you
guys
because
I
was
gonna
just
show
you
the
document
that
I
have
written
and
it
basically
encompasses
everything
we've
said,
and
it
really
does
give
us
which
is
so
normal
to
give
us
complete
wiggle
room
to
stop
this
at
any
time.
If
something
outside
of
what
we
wanted
to
happen
with
you
know
the
idea
of
doing
the
buyback
doesn't
work.
J
You
know
like
we
can
all
come
to
a
consensus
to
just
to
you
know,
put
another
proposal
forward,
saying
hey
you
know,
there's
just
been
way
too
much
front
running
or
whatever
the
problem
is,
and
we
we
can
close
the
program
down
until
we
we
figure
out
what
to
do
about
it
to
fix
it.
Yeah.
J
B
It's
market
by
we're
doing
market
buys
the
amount
in
dollars
and
we
will
do
these
on
a
consistent
basis
until
up
to
a
million
dollars
in
as
long
as
dxd
eth
is
at
a
certain
price
below.
C
J
B
Does
make
me
a
little
worried,
I'm
not
like
just
as
like
an
instinctual
thing.
C
B
B
C
Yeah-
and
I
think
that's
what
this
does-
it
gives
us
a
nice
like
simple
parameter,
that's
you
know
very
easy
to
convey
to
the
community
and
then
it
gives
us
a
way
to
implement
it.
I
think,
in
this
case,
though,
if
we,
what
we
actually
do
want
to
do
is
is
market
buys,
is
what
we
probably
should
do
is
develop
a
one-inch
relayer,
which
is
probably
going
to
be
useful
anyways,
because
dosa's
protocol
is
going
on
a
commission
at
some
point
or
we
use
the
the
easy
auction
when
it's
ready.
C
J
B
K
J
I
my
point
is
that
you
know
I
can
circulate
the
documents
and
they
can
be
public,
but
once
we
post
the
documents
as
an
announcement
for
a
buyback,
we
want
to
post
it
on
twitter
and
we
want
to
have
everything
ready
to
start
the
buyback
program
that
that's
where,
where
I'm
at
with
with
like
us,
announcing
it
you
know
so
either,
are
we
going
to
do?
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
going
to
do
genosis
or
are
we?
What
do
we
think?
What
is
that.
I
Yeah
the
gnosis
path
we
can
do
like
right
now,
so
I
would,
I
think
we
should
just
go
with
it
and,
like
I
think
we
should
include
like.
If
miser
is
ready,
then
we
like
might
switch
to
miser
just
to
like
include
miser.
If
it's
ready.
A
Yeah
so
gnosis
protocol,
we
can
do
limit
orders
and
you
just
to
buy
a
market
order.
You
basically
set
the
limit
like
10
above
the
market
price
or
something
like,
and
if
the
market
jumps
up.
Okay,
it's
not
gonna
get
done,
but
then
you
need
to
leave
enough.
You
need
to
adjust
it
or
leave
another
limit
or
you.
You
need
to
leave
the
limit
order
far
above
the
market
price,
in
order
to
get
the
market
order
done.
A
It
may
actually
involve
you,
know:
arbit
arbitragers
or
community
people,
buying
dxd
off
of
unit
swap
one
inch
and
sushi
swap
and
swapper
and
then
selling
it
into
orders
on
mesa.
If
that
is
where
the
orders
are
like,
there
will
be,
there
will
likely
be
arbitragers.
Looking
at
this
scenario
right
and
it's
a
way
to
do
market
orders
across
a
number
of
exchanges
via
a
mesa
limit
order.
So
it's
gonna.
It
could
get
kind
of
complex.
But
that's
all
in
the
background.
C
J
J
Going
to
I'll
give
you
guys
I'll
show
you
the
dock,
that
we
have
I'll
drop
it
actually
in
the
governance,
one
of
our
channels-
and
I
don't
know
I'm
going
to
say
these
specifics
unless
we
need
to
do
if
it
feels
absolutely
necessary
or
confusing
somehow
to
the
community.
Okay,.
B
I
mean
I
I
think,
like
we
want
to
have
all
the
great
like
we're.
We've
discussed
this
a
lot.
This
is
like
complicated
stuff,
but
I'm
feeling
like
we're
getting
towards
a
cohesive
thing,
and
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
present
all
of
this
in
a
cohesive
way
to
the
community
once
I'm
hoping
that
we
could
yeah
and
I
think
like
we're
working
on
on
those
tammy
and
like
once,
those
are
all
ready.
We
can
just
do
like
one
dow
talk
post
that
links
to
those.
C
B
And
tammy
like
what
I
was
thinking
of
like
a
sk
timeline
here-
and
this
is
independent
of
the
technical
stuff-
is
that
we
could
like
try
to
shoot
for
a
next
week.
Have
this
post
up
and
then
do
like
a
signal
proposal
from
that
post
and
then
we
could
actually
do
an
x
die.
B
I
think
would
be
fine,
so
that
would
mean
maybe
like
two
weeks
from
today
around
there,
we
would
have
a
signal
proposal
that
would
like
approve
this
plan,
and
then
we
would
move
over
to
like
being
able
to
try
to
like
implement
that
through
technically
and
get
another
actual
proposal
that
executes
the
market
order.
J
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
I
want
it
to
be
some.
I
think
we
should
all.
This
is
it's
a
signal
proposal,
but
it's
also
an
announcement
like
I
know
everything
we
do
here
is
public,
but
it
needs
to
be
pretty
close
in
time
to
like
the
technical
ability
to
be
able
to
to
execute.
It
sounds
like.
J
We
just
need
to
solidify
a
couple
things,
so
two
weeks
should
be
fine.
I
think,
as
long
as
we're
set
on
using
the
genosis
three
layer.
J
Well,
actually
one
thing
we're
still
not
totally
set
on
what
percent
of
book
value,
but
I'm
gonna
think
about
it
a
little
bit
more
and
if
anyone
has
any
specific
opinions
or
thoughts.
Let's
talk.
C
Yeah
and
I
think
what
we
you
know,
the
osis
protocol
is
being
redeployed.
So
what
we
can
do
is
just
wait
to
do
the
proposal
for
this
until
that's
redeployed
and
working
which
may
it
might
be
a
couple
more
weeks
because
of
the
you
know,
requirement
to
have
a
new
multi-call
scheme
installed,
but
but
we
could
do
that.
J
L
B
We're
probably
looking
for
a
signal
proposal
to
pass
and
then
correspond
with
an
announcement
within
like
three
or
three
and
a
half
weeks,
and
then
we
would
be
able
to
execute
on
that
around
at
that
around
then.
B
B
Yeah
I
mean
what
I'm
thinking
is:
there's
a
dow
talk
post
of
what
we're
discussing
here
and
then
that
leads
to
a
signal
proposal
right
and
then
that
goes
through
and
then
that's
what
the
announcement
is
based
off
of
and
then
separate
from
that
we
have
an
actual
proposal
to
like
execute
the
trade,
and
that
will
happen
like
around
the
announcement
or
whatever.
So
then
there
will
be.
You
know
six
or
seven
days
or
whatever
on
that.
C
So
let's
do
this
once
the
new
multi-call
scheme
proposal
gets
made.
I
think
that
would
be
a
good
time
to
do.
The
dow
talk
post
right
because
that's
going
to
take
16
17
days
to
pass,
and
that
gives
like
a
good
two
weeks
of
discussion
on
the
dow
talk
post
and
then
you
know
once
the
new
multi
call's
installed
you're
free
to
do
the
actual
proposal
right.
B
C
The
trade
execution
might
actually
end
up
being
multiple
proposals,
but
yeah
right
right,
right.
That's,
okay,
yeah.
J
Right
so
basically
the
language
in
the
dow
talk
post,
you
know,
subject
to
any
amendments
from
the
community,
is
going
to
be
the
language
and
the
on-chain
proposed
signal
proposal,
and
then
everything
from
there
is
just
whatever
you
need
to
do
with
the
protocol.
That's
my
understanding
and
I
think,
we're
all
on
the
same
page.
K
J
I
C
C
The
next
multi-call
scheme,
so
we're
already
planning
on
testing
the
swapper
liquidity
relayer
this
week.
I
think
it's
actually
ready
to
be
tested.
We
just
need
those
funds
in
the
multi-sync,
so
I'll
get
with
niko
about
what
the
timeline
is.
Looking
like
for
the
gnosis
protocol
relay
our
update
and
how
best
to
test
that.
I
think
we
want
to
test
it
on
xdi
first
but
yeah
yeah.
So
so,
but
that's.
C
H
B
I
do
feel
like
we
had
like
a
breakthrough
at
the
end,
so
I
feel
like
it's
like
worth
it.
I
feel
like
we're
like
getting
agreement
and
have
a
good
path
forward
here.
So
maybe
it's
worth
the
extra
time,
but
any
other
thoughts,
questions.