►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-02-24]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
dx
style
governance,
discussion
february,
24th
2021,
just
going
over
the
agenda
to
start
kind
of
a
bunch
of
different
things
we
want
to
hit
on.
So
I
just
want
to
talk
about
them
all
at
first,
so
we
have
time
for
them.
So
the
governance,
1.0,
stuff
governance,
gas
refunds,
posts
from
nico
is
out
on
the
proposal
roundup,
just
going
through
the
different
proposals
on
on
in
the
queue
right
now
and
then
also
wanted
to
touch
on
some
of
like
the
upcoming
proposals.
A
We
are
I've
been
talking
about
and
the
plan
for
those
and
then
specifically
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
next
treasury
authorization
proposal.
We've
done
some
a
pretty
good
amount
of
diversification
over
the
last
couple
weeks,
so
we
can
talk
about
that
and
check
in
there
on
what
we
plan
to
do
after
and
then
nylon
would
be
good
to
just
kind
of
explain
a
little
bit
of
the
post
that
you
had
on
the
mainnet
base,
reputation,
sync
post
that
you
had
in
dow
talk
and
then
governance.
A
One
point
x,
the
x
die
authorization
proposal
has
not
actually
passed,
but
it
will
pass
in
like
an
hour
or
two
so
that
will
hopefully
move
things
over
to
x.
Diet
it'd
be
good
to
chat
a
little
bit
about
the
process
there
and
make
sure
that
we're
we're
feeling
good
about
that,
and
then
a
gusto
had
mentioned
last
week
about
the
erc20
guild
kind
of
is
coming
into
fruition.
A
So
thinking
about
how
we
actually
have
that
structure
for
dxd
and
then
yeah,
the
governance
2.0
signal
proposal
is
submitted,
and
so
hopefully
that
passes,
but
that's
kind
of
it
there.
A
So,
let's
start
first
with
the
governance,
gas
refunds,
and
so
I
think
the
the
headline
number
is
7.4
eth
in
terms
of
gas
refunds.
This
was
in
january,
and
so
it
goes
from
january,
1st
january
31st
and
I
think
there
were
43
proposals
there.
So
if
you
average
that
out,
I
think
it's
like
0.17
eth
a
proposal
and
gas.
The
grave
price
was
probably
about
like
double
in
february
than
it
was
in
january,
so
it
should
go
up
a
little
bit
but
yeah
nico.
A
I
don't
know
if
you
had
anything
to
talk
about
for
the
january
gas
refunds
number
four.
B
Yeah
I
mean
it
was
obvious
that
the
amounts
are
bigger
because
of
the
gas
prices.
But
besides
of
that,
like
the
only
thing
we
changed
is
that
we
are
also.
B
You
can
now
basically
get
the
amounts
for
redemptions
as
well.
So
that's
something
we
didn't
refund
it
as
of
now,
but
as
we've
seen
that
even
those
governance
actions
are
super
expensive,
we
decided
to
refund
them
for
90
as
well.
That's
that's
new
this
month
and
chris
made
the
proposal
that
we
maybe
do
one
proposal
for
january
and
february
together,
because
we
are
just
a
few
days
more
left
on
february.
So
everybody
is
fine.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
all
you
know
february
is
obviously
a
short
month
too
here,
and
so
that-
and
this
would
presumably
after
february
their
this
cost
should
go
down
a
lot
or
the
proposal
at
least
the
redemption
process
or
the
refund
process
should
not
be
as
robust,
because
people
will
be
switching
their
like
worker
proposals
to
x
die.
So
hopefully
it
would
be.
This
would
be
yeah.
Combining
them
would
maybe
be
like
the
last
big
one.
A
We
would
do,
of
course,
we're
still
going
to
need
to
like
reimburse
governance
actions
on
mainnet.
We
still
have
a
lot
of
things
to
do,
but
there
should
be
a
decrease
in
proposals
and
cost
after
february.
A
So
how
do
people
think
about
that
in
terms
of
just
comb
rolling
these
together
and
probably
doing
a
proposal
in,
like
probably,
I
guess,
seven
days,
probably
or
a
couple
days
after
the
beginning
of
the
month,
and
then
people
could
just
claim
the
january
and
february
costs
together.
A
A
C
Cool
well,
let's
what
will
happen
to
the
recording,
though,
if
he
leaves.
D
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
hear
you
now
and
they're
recording
I'm
assuming
the
recording
continued,
so
okay,
cool
thanks.
I
was
just
gonna,
say
the
refunds
I
think
like
in
the
beginning
like
since
it
might
be
smaller
going
forward
anyway,
but
every
two
months,
like
you,
probably
don't
need
to
do
it
every
one
month.
Every
two
months
in
general
might
just
be
better.
A
Cool,
okay
and
then
switching
to
the
proposal,
roundup.
So
just
the
current
ones.
As
I
said,
the
authorized
and
fun
xdi
dx
style
base
proposal
will
pass
in
three
hours
or
is
expected
to
pass
in
three
hours.
There
is
the
misplaced
dxd
refund
proposal
that
is
slated
to
pass
in
in
10
hours,
so
this
was
someone
who
had
sent
dxd
16.99
dxd
to
the
dxtile
avatar.
No,
I
guess
the
the
buy
back
reserve,
which
was,
I
think,
the
dxd
token
address,
so
the
16.99
is
locked
in
there.
A
A
And
then
we
have
a
bunch
of
treasury
proposals,
so
there's
a
member
balancer-
and
I
think
I
think,
there's
three
member
balancers,
no
there's
two
multi-sig
transactions
and
two
member
balancers
there.
A
I
wanna
talk
about
treasury
stuff
in
just
a
second
there,
but
those
are
going
on
and
then,
as
I
said,
the
governance
2.0
signal
proposal
is
just
got
boosted
last
night
and
is
hopefully
slated
to
to
pass
in
a
week
and
then
a
one
that
I
did
not
actually
have
on
the
agenda
but
is
now
pending.
Boosting
is
the
entree
casa
de
style,
branding
and
website
proposal
that
I
think
was
just
submitted
last
night.
A
D
Sorry
did
you
mention
the
voting
for
governance
ii
proposal?
Are
you
going
to
get
to
that
because
that's
on
main
and
x
died
do?
Should
people
be
voting
on
both
chains
or
one
chain
or
yeah?
Is
it
the.
A
Equivalent,
I
mean
I
would
so
I
mean
a
couple
of
couple
things
for
x.
I
actually,
I
need
to
know
if
anyone
has
any
x-gen.
I
actually
was
looking
for
some
x-gen
and
I
couldn't
I
like
went
on
honey
swap
I
was
trying
to
go
on
honey
swap
to
do
it.
I
couldn't
get
it
so.
I
need
to
bridge
over.
I
didn't
want
to
bridge
over
some
some
of
that,
because
that
proposal
was
actually
not
boosted.
A
D
I
might
have
boosted
it,
but
okay,
yeah,
but
also
the
x-gen
on
honey
swap
is
probably
not
the
right.
X-Gen
yeah.
You
know
you
need
dow
stack
x-gen,
so
you
need
to
use
the
dow
stack
bridge.
Okay,.
A
A
It
was
nice
because,
like
I
did
the
whole
formatting
thing
and
I
was
able
to
just
copy
it
from
that
and
do
it
in
xdi
and
not
have
to
worry
of
the
have
the
anxiety
of
of
200
transaction
fees,
but,
like
I
think,
it's
really
important
that
there
is
signal
from
mainnet
that
governance
2.0
signal
from
the
current
batch
of
rep
holders
that
this
goes
through,
that
this
is
a
huge
like
kind
of
signal
and
change
for
the
for
the
for
the
governance
structure,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
pass
a
proposal
on
mainnet,
but
I
think
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
for
people
to
vote
for
the
same
proposal.
A
Vote
for
the
same
type
of
thing
on
x
die.
So
I
think
if
people
are
in
favor
of
this
proposal,
you
know
whatever
suits
their
their
needs.
I
think
there
is
you
know
we
will
still
do
the
90
reimbursement
on
governance
actions.
That's
still
like
a
somewhat
costly,
symbolic
vote,
but
I
think
the
ex
die
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
get
as
much
participation
as
we
can
on
the
xdi
base.
D
A
Yeah
I
was
waiting
to,
I
was
gonna
post,
specifically
the
x,
I
think
when
it
was
boosted,
but
if
it's
like
already,
I
think
boosted
but
yeah,
I
mean
I
think
this
is
like
anyone
who
supports
this.
I
think
we
should
do.
A
B
Yeah
exactly
that's
like
the
question
like
in
the
best
case,
because,
like
we
experienced
a
lot
of
questions
from
the
new
workers
that
they
actually
went
through
their
first
proposals
and
realized
how
expensive
it
is
and
stuff
like
that,
so
in
the
best
case,
all
of
the
three
new
workers
and
also
martin
would
be
interested
in
actually
submitting
the
proposals
on
xda
already,
and
we
had
a
bunch
of
questions
of
like
how
to
actually
submit
it
like
how
to
actually
get
the
funds
out
of
their
funds,
how
to
get
the
rep
back
to
mainnet
and
etc.
B
I
think
we
can
collect
some
questions
there,
but
yeah.
That
was
like
a
question.
Are
we
ready
on
exile
or
is
there
something
that
needs
to
be
prepared?
First,
before
submitting
the
first
workout
proposal.
A
Yeah-
let's
just
talk
about
this
now
like
knock
these
out
so
one.
There
are
no
funds
right
now,
but
we
should
have
funds.
Hopefully,
by
the
end
of
the
day,
it
would
be
good
to
coordinate
that
on
the
we'll
have
to
do
a
multi-sig
transaction,
a
couple
multi-sig
transactions,
but
that
will
put
a
hundred
eighth
in
x
dies
so,
like
you
know,
160
000
in
the
xda
base,
which
should
be
able
to
do
the
month
of
worker
proposals
that
that
are
coming
up.
A
So
I
think
that
we
should
be
able
to
have
like
all
of
the
worker
proposals
on
xdi
soon
from
a
just
pure
payment
of
of
salary
component.
The
proposal
process
is
actually
this
from
a
like
individual
worker
perspective
is
the
same
in
the
sense
that
it's
like
you
go
to
alchemy,
it's
a
different
dao,
but
you're.
Just
submitting
the
same
type
of
thing,
we'll
have
the
same
relationship
with
dow
talk.
Keep
everything
that
that
the
same
p
some
people
will
need
to
vote
on
it.
A
Hopefully
more
people
will
be
voting
on.
It
needs
to
be
boosted.
All
of
those
things
will
kind
of
be
the
same,
but
I
think
those
shouldn't
be
an
issue.
The
concerns,
I
think,
are
like
three
areas.
One
is
bridging,
like
you
know:
you've
got
money
on
xdi,
but
how
do
you
get
that
into
pay
rent
pay
kind
of
whatever
else
you're
doing
so?
A
Maybe
we
could
talk
about
how
we
can
make
that
process
easier
and
then
the
two
other,
the
two
other
things
are
one:
how
do
we
have
main
net
rep
payments
or
rewards?
And
then
the
third
is
the
dxd
right.
How
do
we
do
those?
And
so
I
think
the
the
rep
and
the
dxd
are
not
completely
answered
yet
we
have,
I
think,
a
solution
that
that
nylon
can
touch
on
about
batching,
multiple
rep
awards
together
and
then
the
dxd.
A
I
think
it's
going
to
be
hard
to
do
that
on
xdi
right
now,
and
we
have
we're
kind
of
solving
some
of
that
in
the
payroll
system.
That
block
rocket
is
working
on
and
I
think
it's
on
it's
probably
best
to
see
what
that
ends
up,
looking
like
before,
coming
into
hard
and
fast
roles
on
the
dxd
compensation,
because
if
theoretically,
they
could
just
have
that
same
system
that
they're
building
on
mainnet
and
you
know,
obviously
deploy
it
to
xdi.
A
That
comes
with
a
bunch
of
other
complications
there,
but
I
would
I'm
hoping
that
we're
moving
towards
where
every
worker
proposal,
starting
from
tomorrow
and
even
like
the
entree
entree
casa
proposal,
that
we
can
start
doing
these
through
exercise
just
because
the
cost
are
are
too
much.
There
really
shouldn't,
be
anything
that
we
can't
do
there
nylon.
Do
you
want
to
touch
on
the
the
rep
component?
A
I
think
for
right
now,
just
on
the
rep
like
we
are
still,
you
know
we're
still
opera
operating
under
the
guidelines
that
each
worker
full-time
contributors
do
0.1667
percent
rep
every
month,
and
so
that's
still
the
case,
but
we
won't
be
able
to
do
the
actual
reward
distribution
in
the
proposal,
so
we'll
have
to
figure
out
actually
how
how
we
batch
those
together
so
nylon
you
had
posted
about
it.
Do
you
wanna.
C
Yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
link
to
the
thread.
First
of
all,
a
quick
question:
what
do
you
think
about
the
name
metronome?
Is
it
gonna
be
like
oren
and
myself
participating
in
the
big
style
through
that
he
chose
the
name
anyway.
So
this
is
like
there's
a
there's,
a
question:
jeff
garcia.
What.
C
Right,
yeah
yeah,
that's
true!
It's
like
metronome
that
I
always
take
it
because
of
that
yeah
anyway,
the
question
of
basically
dxi
bases
the
x
die
and
other
bases
that
we're
going
to
have
and
how
they're
treated
and
or
reflected
on
mainnet
in
terms
of
reputation.
That's
kind
of
like
an
open
question
kind
of
like
in
the
post.
There's
an
outline
like
we
might
decide
that
once
a
base
forks
off,
it
continues
off
on
its
own
reputation.
C
Trajectory
basically
and
we
don't
really
mind
it,
and
the
other
solution
is
to
kind
of
equalize
the
reputation
from
the
different
basis
and
periodically
update
them
onto
the
maina
dao.
And
this
is
a
solution
that
I
came
up
with
oren.
Basically,
it's
something
that
I
had.
Basically,
I
expect
and
develop,
and
we
developed
it
like
for
east
denver
still
needs
some
testing.
It
did
go
through
an
audit
where,
where
I
can
send
it
yeah,
maybe
I'll
catch
it
I'll
edit
and
attach
to
the
post.
C
But
basically
you
register
a
reputation
admin
which
takes
a
couple
of
inputs.
What
is
the
owner
address?
When
is
the
start
time?
What
is
the
end
time?
And,
what's
the
maximum
amount
of
reputation,
it
can
mint
or
burn.
So
you
initiate
that
plug-in,
basically,
as
with
the
dow
as
the
owner
and
then
the
dao
can
essentially
give
that
plug-in
an
array
of
addresses
and
the
amount
of
reputation
to
mint,
and
in
this
way
yeah
you
can
mint.
C
I
tested
it
up
to
like
100
addresses
and
minting
up
to
100
like
it
it.
It
fills
up
basically
an
ethereum
block
right,
so
it's
going
to
cost
a
lot.
But
if
we
do
this
every
three
months,
every
every
six
months,
then
you
know
we
only
need
to
like
it's
basically
one
transaction.
That
means
a
lot
of
reputation
to
a
lot
of
people
it's
fairly
safe,
because
when
you
initialize
the
plug-in
you
you
give
it
the
amount
of
reputation
that
it
can
mint.
C
So
if
theoretically
someone
takes
over,
they
can
only
get
that
amount
of
rep,
and
then
we
can
slash
it
afterwards
and
yeah
like
this
is
like
we
can
use
this.
We
we
need
to
like
finalize
the
process
and
how
it
looks
like,
but
I
think
this
could
be
a
great
solution
to
if
you
want
to
continue
like
essentially
normalizing
the
the
reputation
between
mainnet
and
the
basis.
D
D
Could
this
be
used?
This
could
be
also
used
on
xdi
right,
because
the
the
actual
the
the
thing
that's
not
normalized
right
now
is
there's
a
lot
of
people
like
most
of
the
key,
like
main
workers
over
the
last
like
three
four
months
since
we
cloned
since
we
mapped
mainnet
rep,
they
don't
have
their
rep
or
any
rep
on
xdy.
D
So
we
could
use
that
on
xdi
to
like
match
it
to
mainnet
to
as
a
test
yeah
and
then
and
then
once
we
use
x
die
going
forward
more
then
you
would
then
use
it.
The
opposite
direction
on
mainly
yeah.
C
Yeah
yeah,
it
could
also
be
used
on
x,
died,
obviously
yeah.
So
I
think,
like
the
next
steps,
it's
actually
to
do
it
on
rinkiby,
and
you
know
test
it
out,
see
that
it
works
also
test
some
edge
cases
and
then
test
it
on
xdi
see
we
can
do
it
on
next
day
and
then
probably
the
last
step
is
to
actually
touch
on
the
mainnet
base.
C
Be
used
theoretically
for
the
rep
boost
as
well
or
yeah
like
we
can
include
everything
in
in
like
one
transaction.
That
means
a
shitload
of
rep.
A
Yeah-
and
I
definitely
think
we
need
this
tool,
but
now
and
just
like
in
you
talking
about
it,
we
definitely
need
to
come
up
with,
like
a
very
thought
out,
robust
process
for
like
when
we
are
using
it
and
like
minting
a
bunch
of
reputation
and
like
distributing
it,
because
that
will
become
like
a
an
event
or
something
yeah
like
right
now.
We
know
that
the
one
thing
the
thing
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing,
especially
as
it
you
know
relates
to
governance
2.0.
A
We
want
to
make
sure
that
contributors
are
getting
their
main
net
rep
awards
in
a
like,
predictable,
consistent
faction.
So
we
imagine
that
we'd
want
to
do
like
one
in
three
months
and
then
maybe
one
like
three
months
after
that,
but
thinking
about
like
what
that
process
is
for
what
is
included
in
those
rep
distributions,
because
they
will
be
aggregated
together.
We're
gonna
we'll
have
to
think
about
what
that.
What
what
that
process
is.
C
Yeah
I
mean
we
could
just
like
pull
in
a
couple
of
sources.
Let's
say
you
know,
one
source
is:
let's
see
if
we're
doing
it
on
x,
di
one
source
is
the
difference
between
mainnet
and
xi.
Right
now,
like
people
who
have
reputation
on
mainnet,
but
don't
have
it
on
xdi.
So
that's
a
list
of
p
like
addresses
and
the
reputation.
C
I
don't
know
something
else
or
like
additional
kind
of
events,
and
we
we
categorize
these,
hopefully
like
a
dow
dog
thread
right
and
like
have
everything
transparent
and
then
you
know,
the
deployment
or
initialization
of
that
scheme
will
be
also
transparent
with
that
list
and
then
then
yeah
like
the
actual
proposal,
the
multi-call
proposal
to
mint
the
reputation
will
be
also
sort
of
monitored.
A
And
nico,
just
returning
to
your
question
about
like
mesa
worker
proposals
does
this.
I
know
that
everything
is
solved
in
the
rough
thing,
a
little
bit
of
a
question
and
same
with
the
dxd,
but
you
think
there's
like
enough
structure
emerging
for
that.
Hopefully,
next
week
we
can
do.
Maybe
we
could
do
a
proposal
even
on
this
call.
But
yeah
is
that
enough
info.
B
Definitely
yeah,
so
I
so
it
sounds
to
me
even
if
we
are
a
little
bit
early
and
still
have
to
figure
out
some
stuff.
At
least
the
payment
is
available,
and
I
guess,
like
that's,
that's
the
most
important
thing
and
they
bridge
it
back
to
mainnet
as
soon
as
we
have
that.
I
think
we
can
go
ahead
and
try
the
first
worker
proposals
on
on
the
mesa
squad.
B
D
The
method
would
be
request
request.
Your
payment
in
in
xdi
include
the
worker
rep
0.16
percent
in
that
in
that
proposal,
as
xdi
reputation,
and
also
put
a
note
in
your
proposal
about
the
dxd
vesting.
That
will
eventually
happen
on
mainnet,
so
it's
recorded
and
then
you
have
all
three
things
in
your
one
proposal
on
x.
Die
is,
and
then
it
says.
A
Yeah
because
we're
developing
the
tools
to
be
able
to
like
you
know
if
to
go
back
and
and
like
distribute
those.
But
it's
important
to
have
them
noted
and
recorded
at
the
time.
A
Cool
and
just
skye
or
whoever
we're
thinking
about
the
it
probably
will
be
some
in
a
couple
hours.
It
would
be
good
to
start
the
process
for
the
multi-sig
today
or
tomorrow,
just
to
get
that
the
x
die
in
there,
because
I
know
it'll
probably
be
a
little
bit
more
complicated
than
what
we've
been
doing
with
the
treasury
diversification.
D
Yeah
what
what
you
said
it
passes
in
like
an
hour
right.
I
did
63
hours.
I
just
looked
at
it.
It's
just
three
hours,
so,
okay,
okay,.
A
Cool
okay
and
then
I
wanted
to
just
kind
of
touch
on
a
couple
like
upcoming
proposals
that
we
are
working
on
that
are
in
in
the
works
that
we
don't
have
live
proposals
yet
and
just
kind
of
provide
a
little
bit
of
a
update
or
or
plan
of
action
on
those.
So
the
three
big
ones.
Thinking
about
our
one
halt
the
bonding
curve.
A
Two
is
swapper
liquidity,
deposit
and
I
maybe
include
the
relayer
into
this
and
then
three
is
the
dxd
buyback,
and
so
I
could
talk
a
little
about
the
dxc
buyback.
I
don't
john.
Maybe
you
could
give
us
an
update
on
the
the
hot,
the
bonding
curve
and
the
swapper
liquidity
deposit,
yep.
F
So
all
these
things
you
know
we
had
some
trouble
with
the
liquidity
deposit
and
the
gnosis
protocol,
real
layer
and
the
lesson
there
was
that
we
didn't
do
good
job
integration
testing
there.
And
so
that's
what
we're
working
on
this
week,
because
actually
just
doing
that
before
that
call
and
nico
and
augusto
have
been
working
on
that
as
well.
F
So
my
hope
is
that
by
the
end
of
this
week,
we'll
have
completed
like
a
full
round
of
integration
testing
for
for
testing
out
the
bonding
higher
minimum
investment
parameter,
which
is
the
way
we
will
pause
the
bonding
curve,
as
well
as
the
swap
or
liquidity
relayers,
and
then
the
gnosis
protocol
really
with
a
fix,
and
so
hopefully,
by
next
week,
we'll
be
cleared
to
do
all
these
things.
And
I
don't
know
if
nico
or
gusto
you
had
anything
to
add
there,
but
that
that's
what
I'm
hoping.
G
Cool
yeah
on
the
sorry
on
the
bonding
curve
we
will
have.
We
will
need
also
to
update
the
extras
application,
because
once
we
hide
the
cure,
the
minimum
investment
is
going
to
set
to
a
value
where
it's
not
going
to
allow
you
by
anymore,
and
for
this
we
will
have
to
update
the
dx
the
extras,
slash,
open
race,
slash
where
we
are
secure
application.
G
So
we
will
have
to
create
two
proposals.
One
will
be
the
one
that
we
are
testing
right
now
to
update
the
configuration
of
the
cure
to
set
the
minimum
investment
at
the
max
integral
and
the
other
one
will
be
to
update
the
extras
application
to
the
latest
one
with
new
design
that
I
applied.
That
said,
sent.
A
G
G
I'm
going
to
vote
it
right
now
and
we
have
it
the
extras
application,
the
one
that
we
are
going
to
deploy
on
maintenance
on
rinkeby.
So
once
this
proposal
ring
by
that
uses
the
same
smart
contract
that
we
call
maintenance
gets
approved,
we
are
going
to
see
that
it.
It
is
heavy
on
rink
away
and
we
will
test
the
process
and,
if
or
worse,
if
all
works.
Well,
we
are
going
to
repeat
the
process
next
week.
One
minute.
A
G
Yeah,
I'm
working
out
there,
I'm
going
to
send
you
the
link
of
the
proposal
that
I
created
I'm
going
to
vote
it
right
now
with
the
rep,
because
we
have
the
same
rep
there
that
you
have
made
it.
Actually.
It
was
I
think,
a
month
ago
that
I
I
used
the
the
the
mapping
rep
that
we
are
using
mxi,
so
yeah
yeah
go
and
work
in
a
row
there.
You
have
it
ready
for
next
for
next
month.
C
Oh
augusto,
I
have
a
question
like
this
right.
Give
me
dao
like
just
the
address
you
can
use
that
and
it
has
like
five
minutes
resolution
times
so,
like
everything
will
be
much
faster.
G
Yeah
but
the
owner
of
the
vxtrass
of
the
vxz
token
that
I
deploy
is
this
tao
and
well.
I
still
have
to
update
the
ringkevi
configuration
because
I
use
like
hours
and
I
should
have
used
minutes.
G
A
So
many
dx
style
bases,
cool,
mms
and
then
so
timelines
for
the
the
halt,
the
bonding
curve
and
the
swap
for
the
quarter
deposits.
You
said,
but
the
testing
phase
is
kind
of
going
on
on
there
and
then
the
dxd
buyback
is
another
one
that
we've
been
working
on.
A
It
does
rely
on
some
of
the
technical
implementation
that
we
just
mentioned
on,
because
presumably
we
would
be
using
the
relayer
to
actually
execute
the
buyback,
but
I
think
that
we
can
do
things
in
the
meantime
to
get
that
to
get
us
ready
for
that.
So
pulp
has
been
working
on
this
a
bit
and
I
think
what
we've
been
discussing
is
coming
up
with.
A
I
think
it
was
a
token
holder
presentation
or
that
on
the
transparency
statement,
but
basically
we're
trying
to
come
up
with
some
material
to
basically
explain
what
we're
doing
with
the
buyback
and
why
we're
doing
it
just
to
kind
of
be
upfront
with
this,
because
you
know
we're
going
to
be
buying
dxd,
that's
going
to
be
like
a
signal
to
the
market
and
so
to
show
kind
of
our
work
that
we've
done
for
that,
I
think,
is
very
important.
A
So
I
think
the
current
plan
is
for
next
wednesday's
governance
discussion
for
us
to
have
a
draft
of
this
token
holder
presentation
that
we
will
be
a
draft
that
will
be
hopefully
posted
on
dow
talk
after
that,
and
that
will
kind
of
kick
start.
The
process
for
that,
and
so
that'll
go
through
like
a
bunch
of
informational
things
about
geek
style.
So
it'll
use
things
like
the
the
budget
and
product
breakdown.
A
Some
of
our
past
costs
we'll
need
to
talk
about
some
of
the
market
risk
and
like
the
overall
organizational
structure
of
dx,
dow,
just
to
kind
of
like
put
these
all
in
one
place
and
then
in
terms
of
what
we
need
or
what
we're
still
working
on
there.
There's
kind
of
two
things
for
the
dxc
buyback
that
are
are
still
input,
so
one
is
like
what
is
it
being
used
for
right?
What
is
the
what's
the
reason
for
this
where
you're
buying
this?
A
What
is
the
kind
of
use
case
of
it,
and
then
two
is
how
much
and
like
the
amount
per
day
to
do
to
execute
that
so
starting
first
with
the
like?
What
is
it
used
for
so,
I
think,
broadly
speaking,
it's
kind
of
dxd
is
undervalued
and
we
want
to
provide
liquidity
on
swapper
and
that's
the
justification
that
we're
that
we're
looking
for
there
and-
and
so
that
would
be.
I
think
there
is
some
question
if
we
would
burn
any
of
the
dx
that
we'd
buy
back
right.
A
We
just
buy
back
and
then
have
100
of
it
go
to
the
treasury,
or
maybe
we
would
buy
some
of
it
back
and
burn
a
small
portion
of
it
to
decrease
the
circulating
supply.
A
So
that's
kind
of
like
one
thing
and
then
the
second
thing
is
on
the
amount
per
day
and
so
kind
of
best
practices
and
how
people
are
you
know
doing
buybacks
now
that
there's
that
much
of
a
track
record,
but
at
least
maybe
in
the
traditional
world,
you
want
to
base
how
much
you're
buying
back
on
a
daily
vault
as
a
percentage
of
daily
volume,
because
obviously
this
would
move
the
market
a
lot,
and
so
we
only
want
to
be
doing
it.
A
Based
upon
how
much
volume
per
day
dxd
is
is
is
seen
on
an
average,
so
we're
probably
netting
out
around
50
000
in
terms
of
the
daily
amount
that
we
could
potentially
buy
back
and
execute
through
that.
That's
also,
I
think,
like
the
minimum
amount,
that
it
would
make
sense
from
a
gas
perspective
right
if
it
takes.
A
I
guess
maybe
it
would
take-
maybe
four
or
five
hundred
dollars
to
execute
one
of
these
trades
through
that
and
then
the
question
is
like
how
much
do
we
want
to
do,
because
I
think
it
would
make
sense
if
we're
doing
a
buy
back
to
set
a
like.
We
are
going
to
like
do
these
purchases
every
day
at
like,
and
these
are
our
constraints
rather
than
like.
A
We
did
it
once
and
then
we'll
decide
later
like
what
we're,
whether
we
want
to
continue
that
this
is
all
part
of
like
a
specific
buy-back
campaign
that
we're
instituting
over
like
a
month
or
something
so
yeah,
just
kind
of
open
for
questions
or
comments
on
really
like
the
two
things
we're
looking
for
is
is
one:
what
are
we
doing
with
it?
A
We're
going
to
say
that
we
want
to
put
it
in
swapper
and
do
we
want
to
burn
any
of
it
or
just
have
it
all
go
into
the
treasury,
and
then
two
is
we're
landing
kind
of
at
the
amount
per
day.
Maybe
is
around
50
000
dollars
and
then
how
do
we
want
to
like
structure
the
total
amount,
we're
indicating
that
we
we
want
to
buy
so
that
we
can
craft
like
a
whole
like
buyback
campaign,
that's
happening
over
a
period
of
time,
irrespective
of
market
market
movements.
H
That
was
a
great
great
summary
chris,
okay,
so
yeah,
I
think
the
50k.
This
is
it's
somewhat
of
a
technical
question
we
need
to.
We
need
to
know
how
the
relayer
is
going
to
work,
because
just
by
plugging
in
50k
for
buy,
you
know
buy
order
on
a
decentralized
dex.
You
know
you're
going
to
have
about,
let's
say
like
a
10
increase
in
in
the
value
of
the
token
which
keeps
us
within
that
minimal
area.
Where
we're
not,
you
know
completely
encompassing
the
market
for
that
day.
H
So
one
question
I
had
actually
is
with
the
technicals:
what
what
exchanges
would
we
be
getting
the
price
from,
and
what
and
and
could
we
even
purchase
just
off
of
one
exchange,
because
that
would
lower
the
costs
as
far
as
the
buy
order
is
concerned
versus
multiple
exchanges?
H
H
H
We
think
you
know
we've
our
treasury
right
now
is
an
east
and
we
have
the
ability
based
off
of
our
financial
situation
and
our
budget
to
do
the
buyback.
So
what's
what's
the
amount
of
you
know,
this
also
could
be
possibly
used
as
like
a
marketing,
a
marketing
angle
as
well
for
our
own
exchange.
There's
just
like
many
different
things
we
could
think
about
for
this,
so
we
could
potentially
do
the
buyback
over
the
course
of
you
know.
H
Six
months
even
and
I
one
thing
I
was
wondering-
because
I
know
hey
christopher
brought
this
up-
that
there
could
be
issues
with
front
running
and
I
think
that's
going
to
be
an
issue,
no
matter
what
and
with
the
relayer.
H
Is
there
any
way
if
we
put
in
a
certain
amount
that
we're
going
to
do
the
buyback
program
for
say
that's
500,
000
worth
of
dxd
over
the
course
of
six
months
just
say:
could
would
there
be
any
way
to
set
up
a
relayer
or
to
set
up
some
sort
of
like
smart
contract
that
would
randomly
choose
which
days
the
50k
would
be
purchased
like
the
10
days
of
50k?
H
F
I
don't
know
if
nico
already
spoke
to
this
at
all,
when
I
was,
I
had
to
take
a
call,
but
I
think
in
theory
doing
some
kind
of
a
random
thing
is
technically
possible,
but
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
implement
with
the
updates
to
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer.
We
would
have
the
ability
to
do
it
with
one
proposal
have
several
orders
kind
of
staggered
with
different
start
times,
but
it
would
be
transparent
what
those
dates
are
and
when
those
orders
would
go
in.
H
H
So
right
now
our
treasury
is
at
30
approximately
33
million
dollars
worth
of
eth,
not
including
obviously,
we've
already
done
some
transition
over
to
stable
coins,
and
I'm
just
not
including
that
for
this
scope
of
conversation
so
say
for
some
reason:
eath
drops
50
and
we
haven't,
you
know,
moved
more
over
into
stable
coins,
which
we
intend
on
doing
so
worst
case
scenario
say
we
go
down
to
having
you
know,
16.5
million
in
eath,
somehow
in
the
next
year,
and
then
we
have,
I
think,
based
off
of
chris's
budget
calculations.
H
It
looks
like
two
years
if
we
have
a
two
year
runway,
it's
about
5.6
million
dollars,
so
you
know
say
for
say
for
some
reason:
in
a
year
from
now
the
treasury
you
know,
goes
down
in
half
of
eth
and
we
have
a
runway,
then
still
with
5.6
million
for
two
years.
That
would
leave
us
still
with
like
something
just
under
9
million
9
million
in
each.
H
H
Could
we
do
do
people
think
more?
How
how
are
people
feeling
about
keeping
our
eat
reserves?
How
robust
of
a
buy
buyback
program
do
we
want
to
do
you
know
considering
the
worst
case
scenario,
if
all
of
a
sudden
each
drops
by
half
the
price
it
is
now
that's
the
question.
D
So
in
order
to
do
that,
you
probably
are
going
to
want,
and
if
you're
assuming
you're
only
going
to
use
dxc
you
buy
back
with,
I
mean
you
could
use
dxd
we
already
have
if
the
price
is
high
enough,
so
you
don't
maybe
need
to
buy
it
all
back,
but
maybe
more
than
250k
would
give
more
flexibility
around
having
more
awesome.
Swapper
pulls.
I
think.
H
Okay,
all
right.
D
But
but
but
yeah,
but
I
guess
to
my
point,
though,
when
you
start
this
buyback
and
people
are
aware
of
it
and
it's
gonna.
It
could
likely
change
the
price
of
dxd
very
dramatically
right
once
that
happens,
you
have
to
be
able
to
dynamically,
adjust
the
what
we're
doing
with
our
pools
and
what
we're
doing
with
dxd
we
already
have
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
it's
hard
to
know
exactly
how
everything
will
react
to
this
and
then
you'll
have
to
be
dynamically.
Changing
your
plans.
I
think.
H
So
one
thing
I'd
like
to
propose
is
that
I
think
we
need
to
play
out
these
scenarios,
maybe
during
the
product
strategy
chat
as
well,
because
I
think
this
buyback
is
directly
in
relation
to
our
strategy
with
swapper
and
so
like
what
the
the
pros
and
cons
like
the
benefits
are
with
this,
and
I
think,
like
so
50k
in
one
day
with
a
buy
order,
is
about
10.
H
H
So
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
like
think
about
how
this
plays
into
like
our
overall
strategy
with
swapper
and
like
what
best
works
for
swapper,
if
that's
the
main
goal,
as
well
as,
of
course
rewarding
dxd
holders,
because
we
believe
the
price
is
too
low
and
how
how
do
people
feel
about
that?
Like
do
I
you
know
like
us
talking
about
it
now
is
good,
but
maybe
we
need
more
like
more
of
a
thorough
strategy
analysis
in
regards
to
how
this
benefits
swapper.
A
Yeah
I
mean
I
feel
like
swapper
is
the
one
thing
we
kind
of
know
that
we
want.
You
know
I
think,
skye's
completely
right
that
it's
it's
hard
to
project
future
behavior,
because
it
could,
it
will
be
the
our
current
or
future
behavior
will
affect
the
future
environment
right,
and
so
I
think
it's
going
to
be
hard
to
come
up
with,
like
that.
This
is
the
plan
we're
executing
without
knowing
what
that
future
environment
is,
and
so
I
think
we
need
to
just
figure
out
exactly
what
we're
signaling
and
indicating
yeah.
D
So
I
picture
that
this
this
proposal
would
say
something
like
dxd.
Dx
dow
can
buy
back
up
to
1
million
dollars
in
dxd
over
the
next
year
and
that
and
it
will
never
be
done
in
more
than
25
000
dollars
worth
or
50
000
worth
in
one
day
right
and
it
wouldn't-
and
it
won't
happen
in
multiple
days
in
a
row
yeah,
and
if
you
outline
those
parameters,
then
we
can
dynamically
make
decisions
within
those
parameters
and
that
has
been
fully
communicated
to
the
to
the
public
and
so
then,
as
long
as
you're.
D
In
those
parameters
like
like
the
treasury
authorization
proposal,
it's
that
that
is
that
protects,
like
your
liability,
and
it
shows
you
have
this
program,
that's
fair
and
transparent,
but
you
can
still
and
all
of
these
individual
dynamic
decisions
will
still
be
public
on-chain
actions
that
people
can
follow
along
and
see.
I
think.
H
Yeah,
that's
that's
exactly
right,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
so
to
me
1
million
dollars
based
on
our
treasury
worst
case
scenario.
It
wouldn't
be.
We
could
make
that
the
overall
amount
potential
overall
amount
subject
to
change,
of
course,
and
then,
like
you,
said
sky
kind
of,
like
the
specific
dynamics
of
that
we
can
allocate
and
need
that's
needed.
Okay,
yeah.
A
I
think
that's
a
good,
let's
so
paul
we'll
work
on
that
and
then
like
hopefully,
next
wednesday,
we
have
a
draft
with
some
of
these
parameters
and
then
we
can.
That
will
be
what
we
hopefully
push
to
dow
talk.
F
F
They
have
a
higher
fee,
so
you
could
actually
compete
with
it
on
with
the
less
liquidity
and
the
lower
fee,
and
then
the
second
thought
is
that
if,
if
there's
like
a
parameter
for
the
buy
back
to
be
operational,
it
could
be-
and
I
think
pope
you
had
mentioned
something
like
this
in
your
write-up
or
in
previous
conversations.
But
you
know
there
being
a
threshold
that
the
buyback
is
active.
If
you
know
circulating
market
cap
is
below
a
certain
percentage
of
treasury.
F
I
think
that
could
be
an
interesting
approach
to
like
and
with
some
upper
cap
on
how
much
actually
could
be
spent.
You
know
like,
but
yeah.
Those
are
just
like
two.
H
Exactly
we
could,
we
can
have
both
as
factors
like.
Obviously,
if
the
price
of
dxd
moves
significantly
up,
then
the
buyback,
the
need
for
the
buyback
is,
is
less
likely
to
be
the
case
and
also
the
trading
volume
is
going
to
go
way
up,
independent
of
anything
we're
doing.
If
it's.
If
it's
going
up
that
high.
D
A
I
mean
you
can
see
that
where,
like
the
price
moves
a
little
bit
and
like
things
are
yeah
and
there's
like
then
the
dxd
and
the
treasury
becomes
yeah.
I
mean
it's,
it's
just
tough
to
game
everything
out,
we'll
have
to
like
stay
nimble
and
respond
to
these
things.
But
it
is
it's
good
to
try
to
project
things
out
and
then
just
be
able.
F
H
A
Good
cool
all
right
just
want
to
move
along.
I
wanted
to
just
touch
on
treasury
stuff
sky.
I
think
you
had
a
really
great
sheet.
Can
I
I'm
thinking
of
maybe
share
it
if
that's.
D
Yeah
yeah,
that's
public!
It's
just
a
it's
just
a
summary
of
all
of
the
proposals,
basically,
but
in
a
organized.
A
So
do
you
want
to
maybe
just
walk
us
through
this,
because
I
thought
this
was
really
great
right.
So
this
is
the
treasury
authorization
proposal
was
like
a
month
about
a
month
ago
and
we've
been
executing
this
in
a
variety
of
different
ways,
whether
dev
multi-sig
and
then
the
member
balancer
program.
I'm
sure
here
it
says
the
exchange,
the
actual
transaction
and
then
like
the
proposal
that
had
it
yeah,
and
I
think
the
total
number
that
we've
done
is
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
is
1.8
million.
Is
that.
D
Yeah,
the
you
just
scroll
up
just
because
there's
a
few
there's
four
there's
the
x
die
and
then
the
three
usdc
ones
which
are
not
executed
yet
so
it
depends
on
the
market
price,
obviously,
but
like
assuming
it's
around
that
price.
D
If
you
assume
that
those
are
done,
then
yeah
so
then
go
down
again
and
you
have
the
average
rate
like
you
know,
it
shows
that
we've
averaged
in
we
started
at
like
you
know
when
we
were
around
1200
and
now
we're
at
nine,
and
we
went
up
to
1900
now
we're
at
1600,
and
so
then
we
had
allowances.
We
went,
I
guess
we
went
a
tiny
bit
over
with
die
because
most
a
lot
of
the
member
balancers
were
actually
in
die.
D
So,
like
that's,
the
one
thing
is
member
balancer
is
a
is
a
is
a
thing.
That's
you
know,
kind
of
on
a
on
a
member
right
and,
and
the
dao
has
less
control
of
that
it
could
disapprove.
It
could
disapprove
the
the
a
proposal
and
it
could
send
back
the
heat
to
the
person
right
theoretically,
but
we're
basically
on
track
for
the
targets
that
we
were
aiming
for.
The
x
die
one,
which
is
an
additional
160
or
100
each,
so
160
x
die
that
was
kind
of
outside
of
so
that's
like.
D
In
addition
to
so,
we
went
over
a
little
bit
extra
there,
but
that's
more
for
like
payroll,
so
that
I
guess
we
could
include
that
in
die,
but
that's
being
used
for
payroll
on
next
day.
D
So
really
we
need
more
susd
and
then
usdt
to
get
to
the
target
amounts
down
below
for
the
total
of
3
million
us
dollars
worth
do
yeah,
that's
what
that's
what
we
had
approved
in
the
as
long
as
I
I
mean.
Unless
someone
has
an
issue
with
susd
and
usdtd,
that's
what
we
had
approved.
That's
what
we're
still
going
to
do.
A
D
F
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
the
preference
in
general
would
be
for
more
decentralization,
and
I
think
that's
why
dye
is
attractive.
I
think
that's
also
one
of
the
reasons
scsd
is
potentially
more
attractive,
although
I
don't
know
how
decentralized
their
governance
really
is
at
this
point,
but
I
mean
I
think
at
least
it's
an
on-chain
synthetic
asset.
I
think
the
other.
F
Is
is
to
do
this
to
provide
this
liquidity
on
the
swapper
and
yeah
also
kind
of
help
build
connections
with
synthetics.
A
A
I
think
susd
actually
has
probably
some
of
the
juicier
yields,
but
that's
a
maybe
secondary
consideration.
I
Yeah,
like
I
just
think,
collateral
protected,
stable
coins
are
like
way
more
secure
for
the
stablecoin
holders,
like.
F
I
Is
basically
senior
share,
it's
just
backed
by
snx
and
if
snx
is
like
going
to
like
south,
the
whole
system
could
break.
I
Yeah
like
and
then
people
start,
disbelieving
sust
is
going
back
to
one
dollar
and
then
it's
like
a
death
spiral
like
it's
unproven,
but
I
just
think
having
like
again
collateral
based
stablecoin.
I
I
it's
it's
a
personal
thing,
but
I
expect
we
will
see
some
senior
share
like
they
have
been
stable
coins
which
are
backed
by
like
some
token,
which
went
like
south
and
they
never
recovered
back.
F
I
F
And
then
on
tether,
I
think
that
you
know
one
of
the
reasons
that
tether
is
lower
here
is
people
have
concerns
about
the
solvency
behind
tether,
though
there
was
some
I'd
say
fairly
positive
news
for
tether
this
week
because
they
settled
with
new
york
attorney
general
on
the
case
against
that.
So
I
guess
there's
not
any
potential
like
legal
threats
against
them
right
now.
I
don't
know.
D
I
Like
a
more
like,
I
expected
that
we
have
like
stablecoin
pools
and
then
it
will
allow
people
to
use
any
stablecoin
to
buy
dxd.
If
we
have
a
uct
ustc,
then
people
could
still
route
through
that
pool
and
it
would
like
way
less
risky
for
the
d
star
to
provide
liquidity.
I
D
Yeah
yeah,
I
I
mean
I
wasn't
thinking
usdt
usdc
pool
is
like
a
great
pool
for
swapper,
but
it
could
be.
It
would
be
awesome
if
dxd
was
the
connector
of
the
different
tokens
right
like
that's
what
one
is
doing
with
one
inch
token.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
usdc
and
usdt
and
really
die
are
all
like
you
have
to
have
them
to
play,
because
people
are
going
to
come
with
those
tokens
to
the
exchange
right
to
swap
or
even,
if
really,
even,
if
it's
an
aggregate,
so
you
have
to
have
like
a
route
for
those
just
for
some
numbers
here,
susd
is
250
million
dollars
in
circulation,
die
is
2.26
billion,
usdc
is
8.2
billion
and
usdt
is
20
billion,
so
the
susd
I
mean
250
million
is
is,
is
pretty
significant.
A
I
I
mean
I
think
it's
important,
that
I
mean
I
think
stable
coins
are
probably
gonna,
be
maybe
it's
a
winner
take
all,
but
it's
probably
like
a
dime
a
dozen
right,
and
I
think
that
there
are
like
centralization
concerns
here,
and
so
the
question
is
like
how
to
how
to
minimize
those
did
you
minimize
them
just
by
like
having
the
most
decentralized
stable
coin,
or
do
you
minimize
it
by
having
multiple,
stable
coins.
A
A
Money,
so
I
guess
there's
questions
on
specifically
what
we're
doing
with
this.
The
one
question
is
like
I
mean
susd
if
we
want
to,
if
there's
any
want
to
change
course
on
that,
and
then
secondly,
like,
I
think
we're
getting
to
the
conversation,
we
start
like
the
next
treasury
authorization
proposal,
because
just
off
of
like
the
same
timeline,
you
know
we're
probably
going
to
hit
that
three
million
number
in
three
two
or
two
two
or
three
weeks,
maybe
so
yeah.
How
are
people
thinking
about
how
we
should
we
move
forward
after
after.
D
That
once
we
have
three
million,
that
was
our
initial
goal
like
we
want
to
continue
it
probably,
but
maybe
at
a
slower
pace
like
to
average
in
at
us,
at
a
slower
pace
or
do
we
want
to?
A
A
Are
those
all
going
into
swapper
right
or
how
much
of
those
are
going
into
swapper,
because
the
x
exile
will
handle
worker
proposals
and
and
funds
in
there
and
then
like?
Should
we
be
putting
stable
coins
in
non-dx
style
products?
You
know
thinking
of
getting
some
some
yield.
Is
that
are
we
looking
to
do
that
now
or
do
we
want
to
get
things
in
the
swapper
first
and
then
try
to
increase
the
number
of
stable
coins
more
diversify?
Further
out
of
eth
yeah,
I
guess
the
swapper
getting
getting
things
into.
A
Yeah
and
one
of
the
things
I
I
agree
with
that
and
this
kind
of
the
buyback
is-
is
somewhat
related
to
this
too,
but
I
do
think
the
for
swapper.
A
D
Yeah
and
we,
if
we
were
talking
about
like
five
million
of
value
like
into
like
x,
die
swapper
to
like
beat
honey,
swap
what
tokens
are
those
and
and
that
will
take
a
while
yeah
I
mean
well,
we
can
do
it
faster,
but
then
how
much
is
a
is
another
is
a
unanswered
question.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
we
should
start
you
know-
we
notice
this
whenever
we're
doing
anything
like
there's
all
the
process
of
doing
we
learn
things,
and
so
it's
like
we
should
start
thinking
about
additional
liquidity
into
x,
x
di
swapper,
maybe
eventually
it
could
go
up
to
what
you're
talking
about
sky,
but
we
should
start
flirting
with
that
idea
and
thinking
about
how
it
would
play
out.
D
We
should
turn
on
a
faucet
to
like
move
like
like
we're
going
to
have
the
first
proposal
to
move
into
x
die,
but
you
basically
start
by
moving
across
the
bridge
and
that's
x
die.
So
we
could
do
that
like
every
two
days
to
get
like
a
million
dollars
onto
x
die
to
start
and
then
once
you
have
a
million
dollars
on
x
die.
You
can
put
something
to
swap
her
right
so,
but
we
need
to
get
more
money
on
to
ex
die
right.
A
Yeah-
and
maybe
I
can
do
you
know
after
this
authorization
proposal
passes,
we
can
just
do
another
one
after
that,
I
guess
it
will
complicate
things
a
little
bit
because
x
dies.
You
know,
presumably
that's
the
exposure
to
die
but
yeah.
I
just
think
like
we
just
need
to
keep
rolling
these.
F
I
have
to
be
exposed
to
that.
We
could
do
wrap
teeth.
F
I
Also,
I
think
we
will
provide
dxd
liquidity
on
swapper
as
soon
as
possible.
Right,
like
I,
don't
think,
that's
I
don't
think
we
need
to
do
the
buyback
before
we
provide
the
clearing.
I
Yeah,
the
discussion,
I
think,
did
we
had
the
discussions
where
bonding
curve
was
open
like
if
we
close
it.
There's
no
issue
like
I
think.
B
J
J
D
I
Like
my
feeling
is,
and
that's
like
a
small
subset
of
the
the
overall
public
opinion-
probably,
but
I
have
the
feeling
that
xd
holders
really
want
to
see
liquidity
on
swapper
like
they
don't.
Actually,
they
all
want
to
see
like
dig
star
generating
revenue
and
we
we're
losing
out
of
revenue.
Why
using
flopper.
J
That
would
be
much
more
wiser
like
right,
like
so
people
that
want
to
actually
exit
dxd
edit
their
token.
They
can
do
that.
Also
people
holding
they
want
to
hold
long
term
and
want
to
see
the
price
going
up
will
be
happy.
But
if
we
put
our
own
liquidity,
which
stabilizes
the
price
at
the
lower
lower
like
and
we're
not
sure.
J
I
Wrong
from
from
teams
who,
like
based
on
experience,
the
more
liquidity
you
add,
it's
actually
like
way
better
in
terms
of
price
appreciation,
because
it
will
allow
like
whales
to
buy
in
easier.
So
there's
right
now.
No
one
can.
J
But
so
like
we,
we
need
to
expect
whales
to
buy
for
that
to
happen
right.
So
maybe,
obviously,
if
we
build
build
something
up,
do
events
to
like
announce,
announce
our
product.
Lineup
do
partnerships
stuff
like
that,
will
I
that
actually
drives
these
whales
to
buy
yeah
then
I
agree.
Let's
do
it,
but
if
we
just
like
just
add
liquidity
and
like
I
think,
everybody's.
F
Right
here,
right,
like
I
mean
that's
right,
that
if
we
put
in
more
liquidity,
there's
literally
more
dxt
that
has
to
be
bought
for
the
price
to
go
up,
it's
going
to
be
harder
for
the
best
spot.
But
I
think
the
point
is
correct
that,
like
some
people
are
actually
deterred
from
buying
because
there
just
simply
isn't
enough
liquidity
and
they're
not
going
to
move
the
price.
50
percent,
thereby
and
pope
raised
their
hand.
E
I
I
That,
like
another
intermediate
question,
is
like:
when
are
we
actually
ready
with
the
farming
feature
right?
I
think
it's
still
like
a
few
a
few
weeks
away,
which
means
like
those
weeks
away.
We
need
like
we're
losing
out
the
longer
there's,
no
liquidity
on
swapper,
the
more
we
lose
out.
A
A
Right,
like
I
mean,
there's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
traded
on
dxd
in
a
day
so
like
just
the
fees
on
that
are
like
not
going
to
be
super
super
high
that
we're
we're
getting.
So
it
seems
to
me
like
to
me
it's
like
part
of
the
puzzle
of
like
making
swapper
a
really
great
thing,
but
it's
like.
A
Is
it
like
the
first
step
because,
like
what
does
it
get
us
in
in
the
short
term
like
that
to
me,
this
is
like
a
multi-step
process
and
like
it's
probably,
I
guess
I
see
buyback
first
in
a
lot,
but.
F
D
D
D
J
A
I
I
Like
one
one
point
is:
if
the
g
like,
if
we
do
a
snapshot,
mode
and
dxc
voters
say
yes
put
liquidity
on
swap
and
we
do
it
all
right.
That's
easy.
J
I
mean
yeah,
let's
do
it,
I
I
I
wanna
do
like
I'm
not
arguing
like
from
from
from
the
perspective
of
of
the
style.
It's
it's
better,
but
from
the
perspective
of
investors
holding
dxd
and
then
I
would
say
like
if
we
had
a
plan
where
we
release
like
multiple
announcements
and
and
drive
hype,
drive
driving
new
investors
and
yeah,
that
that
would
make
sense
to
put
liquidity
from
our
side.
J
But
if
we
just
gonna
do
like
internal
stuff,
where
we
just
update,
put
liquidity
and
and
then
like
weeks
later,
do
something
else
and
something
like
I
think,
if
we
do
that,
we
need
to
to
do
it
as
an
event
right.
We
need
to
do
like
three
or
four
more
stuff
after
that.
Right
just
add
announcements
on
that.
They
don't
need
to
be
directly
connected,
but
just
which.
F
We're
planning
anyways
right
like
we
have
and
we
need
to
coordinate.
This
is
a
topic
for
the
product
strategy
called
this
friday
right
like
how
we're
coordinating
the
the
slew
of
things
that
are
upcoming,
I
would
just
I
think
we
should
do
something
to
boost
txt
liquidity
in
parallel
with
the
buyback.
We
don't
need
to
wait
three
months
to
do
this,
like
I
think
so.
F
J
J
G
I
Like
I
think,
we
should
sell
dmm
as
soon
as
possible
like
why
not
get
rid
of.
D
I
D
H
D
H
C
A
F
D
A
Okay,
so
it
sounds
like
we
can
continue
some
conversation
on
the
friday
product
strategy
call
because
it
really
is
unlike
how
we're
implementing
swapper
liquidity
we
didn't.
I
mean,
I
think
that
even
the
multi-chain
part
of
this
is
even
more
is-
is
relevant
too
there
because
yeah.
A
If
we're
going
to
launch
something
on
on
xdi,
we
want
to
have
having
the
dx
having
dxd
part
of
that,
I
think,
could
be
very
important
too
and
then
yeah,
we'll
kind
of
wait
to
push
forward
with
another
treasury
authorization
proposal
until
we've
got
more
insight
into
what
we
need
from
swapper
liquidity
needs.
A
Cool
the
only
other
thing
we
didn't
really
get
to
was
dxd
guild
and
what
that
kind
of
looks
like.
I
don't
really
have
any
big
thoughts
on
that,
but
augusta's
been
working
on
that,
I
think
he's
gone
through
the
audit
and
so
how
we
kind
of
roll
dxd
holders
into
the
current
rep
governance
is
something
we
need
to
think
about
as
a
design,
yeah
and
so
don't
have
to
have
answers
now,
but
something
to
keep
thinking
about.
A
Cool
anything
else,
reflections
on
on
things
earlier
any
comments
or
things
to
to
think
of.