►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-05-05]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
deep
style
governance
discussion
for
may
5th,
it's
1500
utc,
I'm
starting
with
the
proposal.
Roundup
mainnet,
actually
with
a
little
bit
of
a
cl,
a
lot
more
proposals
than
exercise.
We
have
seven
proposals
that
are
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
mainnet
and
actually
just
three
on
xi
base.
So
for
mainnet
there
is
the
second
deposit
into
swapper
xi.
A
This
is
the
two
of
two
resubmission
of
a
proposal
that
we
had
the
eighth
transfer
problem.
The
test
proposal
just
went
through
last
night
and
the
five
eighth
went
went
to
the
multisig
with
no
problems,
so
this
proposal
will
pass
tonight
and
we
can,
I
think,
it's
like
a
late
late
tonight,
and
then
we
can
move
on
that
tomorrow
and
then
there's
convert
and
transfer
100
to
x
textile
base
on
x
diet.
This
is
just
like
a
moving
of
funds.
A
We
haven't
done
this
since
it's
been
about
four
and
a
half
weeks
since
the
last
one
east
payout
worker
proposal
for
quarkus,
two
omen:
eth
content,
e
s,
domain
proposals
updates,
so
one
for
the
x
die
domain
and
one
for
the
just
regular
omen.eth.
A
And
then
there
is
the
safe
multi-call
installation
which
is
boosting.
I
think
it
will
be
boosted
in
like
a
couple
hours
that
actually
has
a
has
a
two
day,
boosting
period
and
so
john
know.
If
you
want
to
talk
about
the
safe
multi
call
and
and
that
we've
done
some
verification
yesterday.
But
this
has
been
a
big
big
step.
C
Yeah
sure
I
can
address
it,
it's
the
safe
multi
call
installation
is
called
this.
It's
like
the
intermediary
governance
parameters
of
the
three
multi-color
installations
that
are
proposed
looks
like
it's
been
verified
because
it's
boosting,
I
mean
I
took
a
look
at
it
myself.
I
encourage
other
people
to
go
and
just
follow
the
instructions
on
the
proposal
to
actually
verify
that
it's
set
up
correctly
with
the
right
parameters
and
the
right
whitelist.
C
What
it
is
enabling
through
the
whitelist,
is
the
ability
to
connect
with
the
gnosis
protocol,
relayer
the
swapper
liquidity,
relayer
and
also
a
swapper
farming
relayer,
and
you
might
realize
that
swapper
farming
is
actually
not
deployed
on
mainnet
yet,
and
that
is
that
is
right.
It's
not
deployed,
but
this
relayer
could
connect
to
the
eventual
deployment
to
enable
dxdot
to
to
interact
with
it
in
terms
of
setting
up
campaigns
with
rewards
that
are
funded
from
dxdow
itself,
the
treasury.
C
So
you
could
imagine
something
like
a
dxd
campaign
for
like
the
dxd
eth
pair
on
mainnet.
That
could
be
done
with
that
swapper,
firming
relayer,
so
yeah
super
important
proposal
encourage
people
to
take
a
look.
It's
going
to
open
up
a
lot
of
doors
in
terms
of
what
we
want
to
do
with
governance
and
that
we've
been
anxious
to
get
started
so
excited
for
that.
One.
A
And
this
is
a
longer
proposal,
time
period,
so
it
takes
a
even
the
boosting
time.
I
think
it's
48
hours
too,
so
this
is
actually
boosted,
I
think
monday
afternoon,
and
so
that
it'll
just
be
get
it
boosted.
This
afternoon.
A
Cool
moving
along
then
there
is
also
the
style
treasure
diversification
number
15
eat
to
die,
which
I
think
we'll
get
to
in
a
sec,
but
that's
the
first
one
of
the
treasury
authorization
proposal
v2
and
then
just
quickly
on
xdi
base.
There's
augustus
contribution,
work
proposal,
number
one
which
is
for
a
single
xda
and
then
there's
venki's
worker
payment
for
april,
and
then
there's
also
a
proposal
to
add
busd
to
the
swapper
xdi
token
list.
A
So
those
are
all
of
the
outstanding
proposals.
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
questions,
comments
or
concerns
on
those
proposals.
A
Okay
and
then
yeah
just
moving
to
discussion
items,
so
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
treasury
diversification
proposal,
v2
the
execution
plan
and
yeah
and
dave.
I
guess-
had
sent
the
first
transaction
of
that
yesterday.
That
is
already
in
the
queue
so
dave.
If
you
want
to
just
maybe
give
a
preview
of
what
what
to
expect.
D
Yeah
sure
so
I
mean
we
already
transferred
some
funds
that
were
held
in
the
multisig
right,
so
that
was
approved
in
the
signal
proposal
because
from
the
last
treasury
diversification
we
had
some
funds
left
over.
Give
me
one
second
yeah
I'll
mute
the
noise
and
better.
D
Okay,
that
should
be
better,
so
we
already
transferred
the
funds
in
multisig
into
usdc,
and
I've
submitted
the
first
proposal
for
250
ether
to
be
moved
into
die.
D
I
post
a
little
update
on
dow
talk
and
the
idea
is
to
just
retain
the
limitations
imposed
by
the
proposal,
so
250
ether
max
every
two
days,
so
we
can
do
two
transactions,
two
proposals
a
week,
so
to
speak
and
we'll
just
be
fitting
out
the
various
currencies
as
we
go
and,
of
course,
ultimately,
the
let's
say
like
the
last
week
of
the
proposals
that
we'll
send
we'll
just
adjust
the
ether
amount
dynamically
to
make
sure
we
reach
the
5
million.
D
Of
course
that
will
change
all
the
time
depending
on
the
rates,
so
just
try
to
do
250
twice
a
week
and
then,
when
we're
getting
close
to
the
five
million,
which
should
be
two
and
a
half
week,
of
course,
relying
on
ether
volatility,
the
last
transactions
will
just
adjust
them
to
make
sure
we
hit
our
targets
correctly
and
we
hit
the
five
million
more
or
less
yeah
and
then
I'll.
I
don't
know
how
often
I'll
post
I
could
post
every
week.
D
D
A
D
Yeah,
that
was
the
plan
like
next
week,
go
over
the
yield
stuff
and
see
how
we
can.
Maybe
I
believe
compound
is
the
first
one
we
authorized
so
just
see
how
we
could
put
some
capital
into
compound
and
then
later
on,
explore
other
or
yield
farming
and
but
yeah
I'll
post.
Something
about
that
next
week
as
well.
F
E
A
Connected
say
that
again
it
is
or
it's
not
one
of
those,
that's
the
main
question
like.
Can
we
actually
interact
with
the
compound
contracts
with.
C
A
A
A
D
Yeah
sure
so
we
actually
had
a
small
bug
in
the
code
which
actually
the
redeem
contract
itself
was
like
becoming
illegible
to
redeem
some
ether.
So
that's
been
corrected
and
attributed
correctly
to
the
various
addresses
that
actually
did
redeem
and
the
contract
is
already
deployed
and
I'll
be
creating
a
proposal
to
fund
the
contract
right
after
this
call.
So
as
soon
as
that
proposal
passes,
the
smart
contract
will
also
be
funded.
D
And
then
I
also
posted
the
gas
cost
for
the
multi-sig
right,
but
I
think
this
is
a
little
bit
less
formal
right,
like
you
guys,
just
that's
the
amounts
and
there's
still
some
ether
left
as
well
in
the
multisig
to
refund
those.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that
the
governance
refunds-
I
think
so
this
is
for
the
whole
quarter.
I
guess
q1
and
I
think
the
number
was
23.4
east
or
24
east.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
could
say
that
that's
like
seven,
I
mean.
Obviously,
if
we
get
today's
numbers,
that's
you
know
eighty
thousand
dollars
at
the
time.
It
wasn't
eighty
thousand
dollars
because
we
were
spending
that.
A
But
this
is
a
huge
chunk
of
change
that
we
are
reimbursing
here,
but
it
is
over
the
three-month
period
and
then
we
did
because,
starting
in
march
a
lot
of
the
we
most
of
the
worker
proposals
had
been
shifted
over
so
there's
actually
a
pretty
big
decline
in
the
gas
expenditures
there,
but
even
obviously,
whenever
we
do
one
of
these
fund
transfer
proposals
all
of
the
ens
domain
proposals
installing
these
schemes
there's
still
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
things
we're
doing
on
on
mainnet.
A
A
Okay,
next
item
is
dxd
buyback
signal
proposal,
so
this
was
a
post
that
went
live.
I
think,
almost
a
week
ago
and
a
lot
of
got
a
lot
of
discussion.
A
lot
of
people
involved
a
lot
of
ins
and
outs,
and
so
I
think
this
is
the
kind
of
first
step
that
we're
taking
here,
and
this
would
be
a
signal
proposal
to
lay
out
the
intentions
of
the
program
and
then
that
would
be
followed
by
execution
on
that.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
to
be
had
on
this.
Given
we've
talked
about
this
a
lot,
but
just
wanted
to
talk
about
it
here
and
and
see
if
there
are
any
other
thoughts.
I'm
hoping
to
put
this
into
a
formal
proposal
by
the
end
of
the
day,
both
on
main
net-
and
I
guess
x,
did
definitely
mainnet
and
then
assuming
that
would
pass,
we
would
be
able
to
move
forward
from
there.
A
As
john
said,
the
the
multi-call
scheme
on
mainnet
is
needed
to
be
able
to
execute
the
buyback,
that's
to
actually
actually
the
buyback
on
mainnet,
but
we
could
do
this
sooner
on
xdi,
because
the
multicall
scheme
on
x-side
does
not
have
a
white
list.
So
presumably
we
could
be
like
you
know,
seven
to
eight
days
away.
If
this
signal
proposal
passes
from
starting
the
first
buyback
on
on
xda,
so
yeah
any
thoughts,
questions
on
the
buyback
signal
proposal
in
the
program.
A
A
I
could
check,
I
think
about
90
west,
so
there
would
be
enough,
I
think,
to
execute
the
like-
probably
20k,
25k
30k
orders,
but
we
should
like
replenish
it
and
fund
those
orders
specifically,
but
that
wouldn't
be
necessary
a
hold
up
in
terms
of
the
proposal
process
where
we
would
have
to
make
weight
on
a
mainnet
proposal
for
the
funds
to
arrive
in
xdi.
We
have,
I
think,
the
funds
to
to
start
that
proposal
now.
E
A
Yeah,
I
mean
the
only
thing
I'm
thinking
on
the
x
die
is
like
for
the
size
of
the
funds
we've
calculated
like
using
25
percent
of
it,
and
I'm
wondering
maybe
that
if
we're
just
using
on
x
die,
maybe
we
should
have
a
little
bit
smaller
order
for
that
first
one.
So
we
were
going
to
do
like
a
35k
order,
but
maybe
it's
a
20
20k
or
something,
but
that
would
come
when
actually
would
submit
the
order.
A
Do
we
have
a
total
max
amount
of
value
to
bridge
to
x,
die
yeah
yeah,
the
400
that
we've
we've
bridged
over
the
funds
we
bring
up
the
x
die?
You
know,
we've
done
for
two
reasons:
one
to
fund
xda
base
and
have
it
deal
with
operation
funding
operations,
and
so
we
have.
Those
proposals
are
second
to
deposit
liquidity
into
swapper.
So
for
that
we
have
the
multi,
the
dev
multisig
that
will
like
bridge
the
assets
over
and
then
deposit
them
into
dx
dial
based
on
x,
dot.
A
Yeah,
I
think
we
could.
I
think
it
would
be
great
for
deex
dao
itself
to
execute
this.
I
think
it's
a
pretty
cool
thing
to
have
that,
and
I
think
especially
because
we
can
do
it
on
x,
die
soon,
that
that
will
be
the
the
first
instance
and
yeah.
Then
I
think
it
would
probably
be
only
three
or
four
more
days
after
we
would
complete
the
trade
on
xdi
or
we'd,
be
able
to
complete
it
on
mainnet,
with
the
multi
multi
call
scheme
being
installed.
A
So
I'm
I'm
in
favor
of
waiting
until
that.
But
yes,
we
could.
We
could
use
the
the
dead
multisig
now
to
execute
the
buyback.
C
I
think
I
would
favor
doing
that
on
xdi,
where
we
could
get.
You
know
the
consensus
of
the
dao
directly
involved
in
it
I
mean
I
think
the
multistick
is
sort
of
a
crutch
that
we're
trying
to
get
away
from
in
general
and
especially
something
as
you
know.
C
A
Direct
the
I
mean
just
something
to
think
about,
though
I
mean
so
if
we
do
put
this
in
proposal
today,
that'll
be
eight
days
from
when
it
could
go,
and
you
know
if
we
are
doing
this
on
x-I
one
of
the
fun
things
about
doing
proposals
on
x-die
is
we
can
get
majority
vote,
so
it
would
be
really
cool
if
we
could
set
this
up
and
get
majority
vote
on
this,
and
that
would
obviously
speed
the
timeline
up.
A
But
it
would
also
kind
of
be
like
a
a
big
thing,
and
so
I
guess
that
would
be
like
friday,
thursday
and
friday
of
next
week
would
be
when
those
times
we
get
kind
of
organized
and
we.
C
Yeah
exactly
yeah,
it
would
be
great
to
get
that
going
as
soon
as
we
can
there's
a
a
side
benefit
of
doing
it
on
next
day
as
well,
because
I
think
in
theory,
people
might
want
to
do
their
investing.
I
know
some
people
expressed,
you
know
not
wanting
to
do
vesting
contracts
on
xdi
because
of
the
potential
risk
of
you
know
x,
die
in
over
two-year
time
frame,
but
I
mean
in
theory,
people
who
are
waiting
for
the
vesting
system
to
be
put
into
place
could
be
getting
their
dxd
on
xda.
A
And
also,
I
think,
we're
talking
about
launching
a
swapper
farming
campaign
using
some
dxd
and
it
would
be
great
to
be
able
to
have
the
buyback
actually
be
able
to
fund
the
dxd
for
the
swapper
farming
campaign,
as
otherwise
we
would
have
to
use
like
the
multi-sig
decimal
get
gxd
from
from
mainnet
to
xdxdown.
A
G
A
A
He
said:
there's
4
800
eth
and
there
are
discussions
already
about
people
wanting
to
diversify
out
of
eth,
because
we
want
to
have
some
stable
assets,
and
so
of
course
that
was
a
good
decision
not
to
not
to
do
that,
and
the
number
of
eats
in
the
treasury
group
grew
a
lot
after
that
too,
but
anyway,
yeah
and
then
next
similar
to
the
buyback
program.
Signal
proposal
is
a
post
from
john
on
the
dxd
token
model.
So
john,
do
you
want
to
talk
about
what
what
this
post
is
and
what
it?
C
So
I
think
there's
sort
of
this
question
with
product
tokens
of
like
how
is
this
big
picture
going
to
work
right
and
so
there's
a
couple
ideas
in
the
post.
I
hope
people
get
a
chance
to
read
it.
C
One
of
the
main
ideas
is
to
actually
retire
the
bonding
curve.
I
kind
of
point
to
a
few
reasons
why
we
should
do
that.
I
mean,
I
think,
for
one
thing:
it's
not
being
used
effectively
day,
the
buys
have
been
paused,
there's
no
mincing
anymore,
the
sale
price
is
lower
than
the
market
nobody's
ever
sold
on
the
curve,
at
least
intentionally.
C
I
think
there
was
an
accidental
sell
like
very
early
on
it
felt
bad
for
that
person,
but
because
it's
not
really
being
used
and
there's
2499
eth
sitting
in
the
buyback
reserve
right.
So
the
intention
of
this
it
was
10
of
the
buys
in
the
curve
or
set
aside
into
the
buyback
reserve
to
support
the
sell
price
on
the
curve.
C
Right,
so
I
mean
it's
literally
called
the
buyback
reserve
right
and
that
each
is
just
sitting
there
like
doing
nothing
for
the
dxd
holders,
and
so
the
main
idea
here
is
to
change
the
model,
and
we
already
have
the
example
that
you
know
chris
was
just
highlighting
about
how
we're
planning
to
do
a
txt
buyback.
We
could
basically
piggyback
on
on
that
and
change
the
model
to
like
a
buyback.
C
You
know
and
there's
basically
I
guess
two
ways
you
could
do
this
buy
back
and
burn
or
buy
back
and
holds,
and
maybe
that's
a
little
bit
of
of
a
question
that
could
be
discussed
and
then
and
yeah,
and
then
I
think,
because
it's
a
buyback
reserve.
It's
only
natural
that
that
2500,
each,
which
is
worth
I
don't
know,
eight
and
a
half
million,
or
so
these
days
would
be
dedicated
to
buying
back
dxd
and
supporting
the
price
of
dxds.
That
was
always
intended
to
do
and
then
like.
C
The
second
idea
is
like
how
to
handle
product
tokens
and-
and
I
think
I
don't
know
I
actually
haven't-
read
the
omen
post.
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
do
that,
but
I
think
that
it
ties
into
that.
But
the
basic
idea
would
be
that
dx
dow
is
issuing
these
product
tokens
to
benefit
the
products
to
grow.
C
The
pie
to
you
know
help
with
the
brand
recognition
and
growing
user
communities
around
these
products,
and
it
would
issue
these
tokens
to
the
benefit
of
itself
in
the
product
communities
and
retain
you
know
whatever
it
thought
was
a
good
amount
and
we
could
do
a
dividend
model
where
people
who
have
the
product
tokens
can
stake
those
tokens
and
it's
probably
going
to
be
in
a
governance
contract
that
is
actually
responsible
for
doing
things
like
setting
the
protocol
fee
anyways
and
any
fees
that
are
collected
a
share
of
those
fees.
C
Could
be
sent
to
the
staking
contract
and
the
product
token
holders
would
be
earning
their
like
share.
The
fees
by
staking
and
the
portion
like
corresponding
to
the
amount
held
by
the
dxnow
treasury
would
then
be
sent
to
dxtile
for
the
purpose
of
buying
back
dxd
and
either
like
burning
or
holding
it.
E
Yeah,
what's
also
important,
is
like
back
to
the
buyback
reserve,
those
eve.
They
are
basically
owned
by
dxd
holders
and
if
we
are
actually
using
that
eth
to
buyback
dxd,
we
need
somehow
to
like
either
burn
the
dxd
or
distribute
them
to
the
dxd
holders.
Like
I
don't
think
those
ease
which
we
potentially
gonna
use
should
go
to
like
the
d
star
treasury.
C
G
Yeah
now
the
question
is
how
much
dxd
do
we
need,
because
we
already
have
a
hundred
thousand
dxe
on
a
best
in
contract
that
is
going
to
be
running,
I
think
for
three
or
five
years.
That
is
actually
right
now,
so
do
we
really
need
those
clc?
Because
in
my
eye
as
a
dxe
holder,
it
would
be
better
if
we
use
the
buyback
reserve
to
buy
it
and
burn
the
dfd
and
remove
them
from
the
market,
because
there
is
already
a
huge
amount
of
exe
on
the
lock-in
based
in
contract
down.
E
A
Oh,
I
like
that,
because
it's
like
six
there's
like
18
decimals.
It's
amazing
that
you
could
get
like
one
tiny,
tiny
little
bit
of
dxt,
but
maybe.
A
I
guess
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
product
tokens
like,
because
I
mean
basically
like
there's
the
model
of
like
a
buy
and
burn
model
or
whatever
it's
always
what's,
funding
the
buy
part
of
that
right,
and
so
we're
talking
about
the
buyback
reserve
is
literally
what
would
be
funding
this,
but
in
general
it's
typically
revenue
like
new
revenue
coming
in
that
it's
funding
the
buy
and
then
buying
that
back,
and
so
I
guess
for
product
tokens
like
how
would
revenue
from
the
products
flow
to
dxd,
if
not
through,
like
the
value
of
the
treasury
rising
or-
I
guess,
like
maybe
run
through,
maybe
run
through
the
process
of
like
product
revenue
leading
to
yeah
yeah.
A
C
Think
nathan's
hitting
it
on
the
head
here
right
so
like
with
a
product.
You
have
fees
through
the
protocol
fee
like
eventually
there
could
be
a
fee
on
omen.
You
know
on
the
trades
or
whatnot
that's
going
to
be
collected
somewhere
in
a
smart
contract,
and
then
those
fees
could
be
distributed
to
the
product.
Token
holders
and
dx
now
is
going
to
retain
a
portion
of
that,
and
so
those
fees
could
be
directed
to
and
it
could
be.
A
C
Okay,
yeah.
Let
me
I'm
maybe
making
a
couple
of
steps
in
my
head
that
I'm
not
clearly
explaining,
but
so,
if
you
imagine
a
staking
contract
that
can
distribute
a
share
of
protocol
fees
to
omen
token
holders
and
say
dx
now
retains
I
think
70
is
the
current
proposal.
Right
so
say,
70
percent
of
omen,
token
is
in
the
dx
dow
treasury
30
is
elsewhere
and
in
different
people's
hands,
and
you
know
say,
like
you
know,
half
of
whatever.
C
Let's
say
it's
all
being
staked
just
for
sake
of
argument
right
in
that
that
contract
we
could
set
up
that
staking
contract
so
that
it
recognizes
tx
tao
as
a
special
case
and
splits
the
share
of
protocol
fees
such
that
you
know
the
share
for
the
30
is
just
left
in
that
contract
to
be
earned
by
the
stakers
and
the
70
of
the
of
the
share
that
is
sent
to
the
staking
contract
could
be
redirected
to
say,
like
the
mace,
the
auction
contract
to
buy
back.
C
C
Yeah
that
could
be
another
way,
so
the
rf
noob
is
suggesting.
Why
not
just
having
the
extensive
staking
all
of
its
70
omen.
Token,
and
maybe
tammy
you'd,
want
to
jump
in
here
and
feel
free,
but
I
think
that
that
is
a
potential
technical
implementation
that
would
achieve
the
same
thing.
C
I
think
yeah
I'll
go
ahead.
Timmy.
H
We
we
could
potentially
stake
off
the
tokens,
but
there
is
a
we.
We
also
want
to
have
the
ability
to
have
omen
as
its
own
governance,
token
kind
of
flourish
and
be
able
to
self-govern
and
there's
a
bit
of
a
public
perspective
issue.
H
If
we
as
dx
dao
stakes,
70
of
our
tokens
and
governance,
are
then
basically
controlling
omen
and
then,
therefore,
how
can
omen
guild
really
turn
into
real
value,
and
how
does
the
omen
token
have
value
so,
of
course,
they're
we're
holding
the
tokens
right
now
and
we're
going
to
use
the
tokens
and
issue
them
the
future,
and
I
think
it's
it's
somewhat
symbolic,
but
still
important
to
hold
the
tokens
currently,
especially
as
the
guild
takes
form
and
grows
over
time.
H
Like
we
there's
like
a
multitude
of
things
that
could
happen
that
you
know
there's
a
reason
why
we
should
have
the
tokens.
If
there's
like
some
sort
of
attack,
vector
or
something
like
that,
but
yeah
we
don't.
We
don't
actually
need
to
use
the
tokens
to
do
what
john's
describing
it
can
all
be
done.
You
know
just
on
the
smart
contract
level
to
pass
a
fee
to
a
buyback
reserve.
E
Yeah
and
the
cool
thing
with
that
model
is
it's:
it's
also
like
easily
applicable
to
the
multi-network
product
roadmap
right
as
soon
as
you
have
the
guild
base,
they
will
like
they
will
be
able
to
earn
the
fees
on
that
specific
network
and
everyone
is
able
to
like
just
have
their
own
buying
burn
contracts
on
on
a
specific
network,
so
that
will
all
work
out
pretty
well.
A
A
Yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
there
are
two
ways
to
drive
value
to
a
token,
either
through,
like
promised
future
cash
flows
or
because
that
token
has
a
claim
on
underlying
assets,
and
I
think
the
current
dxd
model
has
been
about
driving
value
through
like
fees
accrued,
but
I
I
think,
if
we're
switching
or
kind
of
as
we
morph,
I
think
tying
the
value
of
dxd
to
the
value
of
the
treasury.
I
think
is
like
a
really
important
thing.
A
I
actually
think
we
can
accomplish
that
by
like
meaning
it
there
and
that's
kind
of
what
we're
doing
and
we're
really
doing
that
through
the
buyback
is
like
we're
kind
of
establishing
that
that
standard.
So
the
market
knows
it
and
we're
supporting
it,
but
I
think
that's
an
important
thing
to
to
convey
kind
of,
as
like
a
forward
forward
guidance.
Almost.
C
The
idea
of
tying
it
to
the
treasury
would
be.
I
mean,
because
this
was
an
idea
that
had
been
floated
a
little
bit.
Last
fall
of
you
know,
having
kind
of
a
unified
capital
pool
or
redemptions
of
the
dxda
is
actually
possible.
So
I
mean,
I
think
in
theory
that
could
could
still
eventually
be
done
now.
Obviously,
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
heavier
left
in
terms
of
the
technical
implementation,
because
it
involves
upgrading
how
the
treasury
itself
works,
but
yeah.
A
But
I
think,
like
I
mean
there's,
this
is
a
huge
move
away
like
what
john
scattered
we're
talking
about
like
almost
steps:
six,
seven,
eight
nine,
but
just
like
the
there
there
there
is
kind
of
consensus
that
I
think
we
want
to
move
from
the
existing
bonding
contract
to
a
new
one,
and
we
want
to
have
that
buyback
reserve
that
exists
due
by
back
dxd
to
to
do
that,
and
I
think
that's
we're
definitely
in
in
agreement.
I
think,
to
move
to
that
direction.
C
Yeah
one
of
the
things
I
kind
of
pointed
out
was:
you
know
that
to
get
the
200
sorry
2499
out
of
the
bonding
curve,
is
going
to
require
that
the
contracts
be
updated.
Obviously,
that's
going
to
take
even
if
it's
a
relatively
simple
contract
that
replaces
the
bonding
curve.
There's
a
process
there.
It's
obviously
a
very
sensitive
contract,
we're
going
to
be
doing
a
couple
audits
and
a
lot
of
testing
and
it's
going
to
take
some
development
work.
So
what
I
suggested
is
that
you
know
through
a
proposal
whatever.
A
C
Enough
in
the
treasury
to
like
get
that
buyback
moving,
I
mean
I'm
already
doing
a
buy
back
kind
of
separately
right,
so
tying
that
amount
into
the
overall
buyback
program,
I
think,
could
just
be
pursued
leveraging
the
existing
funds
in
the
treasury.
Knowing
that,
once
that
update
is
done,
those
funds
would
be
replenished
from
from
the
buyback
reserve.
B
E
Yeah
I
mean
the
the
end
result
will
still
be
the
same.
What
we
just
do
now
is
we
don't
like
we
basically
say
we
take
the
amount
of
ease
which
which
are
sitting
in
the
buyback
reserve
from
our
treasury
and
do
the
action
first
and
burn
the
dxd
for
dxd
holders
and
yeah,
and
then
we
just
like
take
the
east
back
into
the
treasury.
A
Yeah
and
just
if
the
dxd
was
tied
with
the
value
of
tr,
the
treasury,
then
dxd
holders
would
feel
like
dxd
that
is
being
bought
back
is
like
they're
getting
too
right,
and
this
is
like
what
you
mean
you
look
at
all
of
the
like
unit
swap
unit
swap
has
billions
of
billions
and
billions
dollars
of
treasury
that
they're
going
to
deploy.
So
I
do
think
it's
like
important
that
geek
style
has
its
the
dxd
component,
so
I
don't
know
the
burn
model.
I
still
have.
H
I
I
agree,
I
think
I
think,
there's
like
a
a
mixed
option
that
could
also
work
where
what
work
you
know
we
can
do
a
partial
burn
and
a
car
a
partial
keep
for
build,
because
I
agree
that
it
would
be
an
issue
if
we
just
do
a
full-on
buy-back
and
burn
everything.
Definitely.
A
I
mean
obviously
geekster
was
the
biggest
dxd
holder,
so
it's
like
it
burning
that
it
makes
it
like
it
gives
it
more
percentage.
So
it's
like,
I
think
the
difference
is
probably
like
it's
either
like
the
dow
is
getting
70
of
the
value
or
like
100
of
the
value
because
it
owns
you
know,
two-thirds
of
the
dxd
already
so
limiting
the
supply
would
benefit
it.
E
C
And
part
of
the
balanced
approach
to
because
I
agree
that
there
is
potentially
need
for
dxd
in
the
future,
for
liquidity,
incentives,
etc.
Right,
incentivizing
people,
basically,
but
part
of
the
balanced
approach
could
be
to
go
back
to
augusto's
previous
proposal
of
actually
burning
some
of
what
maybe
seems
like
an
excessive
amount
of
dxd
slated
for
the
treasury
at
this
point
right,
so
the
treasury
really
need
two-thirds
of
the
supply.
I
mean
if
some
of
the
circulating
is
burned,
it'll
be
even
more
than
that
right.
So.
A
Probably
not
solved
on
on
this
call
today,
but
things
we
need
to
be
thinking
about
and
considering,
and
I
think
we'll
be
like
flowing
on
after
we,
you
know
got
the
buyback
signal
proposal
will
go
and
then
we'll
execute
on
that
and
there'll
just
be
some
swapper
liquidity.
So
there
will
be
a
lot
of
things
that
we
need
to
move
forward
on
this.
A
I
do
want
to
keep
moving
just
to
keep
in
mind
of
time,
and
so
next
on
the
agenda
is
the
dx
ventures
grant
investment
to
opolis?
So
this
is
a
discussion.
That's
been
on
ongoing
for
a
bit,
I
think
has
been
in
the
forum
for
the
last
eight
days
and
is
looking
to
go
to
proposal
soon,
so
tammy
or
sky.
Do
you
want
to
introduce
the
dx
ventures
into
opolis?
Grant.
H
Yeah,
I
was
actually
a
little
late
getting
on
this
call,
because
I
got
distracted,
updating
the
post
with
some
relevant
information.
I
got
from
the
founder
john
from
opolis,
so
well
two
things
we
definitely
had
a
really.
I
think
lively
and
good
debate
in
the
in
the
actual
forum
about
the
first
investment
option.
Currently,
what
is
proposed,
of
course,
and
we
could
change-
is
50
000
dollars
to
opolis
from
dxdow
and
50
000
from
contributors
that
have
now
been
listed
in
in
the
post.
H
This
would
be
an
exchange
for
tokens,
approximately
300
000
tokens
for
dx
dow.
The
same
amount
would
be
split
up.
I
think
of
of
the
approximate
five
contributors,
along
with
a
percent
of
equity.
That's
really
coming
in
the
form
of
a
grant
of
future
tokens
upon
sale
of
opolis
to
likely
the
commons.
H
The
main,
I
think
we
should
just
generally
like
open
up
for
any
critiques.
The
only
update
I
have
is
a
positive
one,
which
is
good.
Is
that
john?
Just
let
let
us
know
that
he's
now
they've,
since
launching
it
on
april
22nd
they've
increased
from
60
members
of
the
commons
to
3
000
members,
which
is
like
vastly
outblown
their
projections
of
having
300
members
by
the
end
of
2021.
So
that's
good
news
and
I
think
they
have
some
other
traction
related
deals
going
on
with
maker,
dow
yeah.
A
I
Yeah
hi
guys,
so
thank
you
very
much
for
the
for
inviting
me
here
to
express
the
opinion.
So
I
to
be
honest,
I
have
nothing
against
this
police
investment,
so
it
seems
like
a
very
healthy
future
company
and
everything
looks
good.
So
my
points
that
I
raised
in
the
forum
were
more
about
the
process
here
of
of
doing
this
investment.
So
I
have
nothing
really
against
police.
It
seems
a
sound
thing.
I
So
the
first
thing
is
that
you
know
in
crypto.
Everybody
can
basically
invest
on
everything
right,
so
the
tokens
are
divisible,
so
it's
open
to
everybody,
so
we
don't
need
to
invest
through
a
dao
in
general,
the
the
exception
being
when
the
dao
offers
some
advantage
right
like
like.
Indeed
it
is
in
this
case,
but
because
they
basically
give
us
better
deals
than
there
for
single
persons
right,
but
I
think
it's
very
important,
then,
to
discuss
disadvantages
with
a
lot
of
details
right.
I
So
my
first
impression
was
that
the
forum
post
was
very
brief
in
the
sense
that
it
was
not.
I
mean
the
discussion
after
introduced
more
details,
but
my
first
reaction
was
that
it
was
too
brief
because
the
dxd
holders
might
be
interested
in
this
investment,
but
only
if
they
are
really
convinced.
I
That
is
something
you
know
such
a
good
opportunity,
because,
generally
in
crypto,
everybody
wants
to
do
its
own
business
right,
it's
open
and
we
don't
need
an
intermediary
basically
to
do
investments,
and
the
second
point
was
that
I
felt-
and
I
still
feel
that
there
is
no
enough
discussion
on
the
forum.
So
the
discussion
is
not
so
lively,
so
basically
we
have
three
or
four
people
I
mean
included,
answering
and
and
this
if
compared
to
the
large
number,
I
mean
one
thousand
six
hundred
or
something
these
the
holders.
I
I
think
it's
it's
not
sufficient
to
to
to
consider
it
as
a
healthy
discussion,
especially
because
these
these
the
ventures
was
not.
I
You
know,
launched
at
the
very
beginning
of
this
now
something
more
recent,
and
I
don't
know
if
the
dxd
holders
are
voting
on
this
right,
because
I
think
the
votings
at
the
moment
is
in
the
hands
of
the
right
holders,
which
is
great
for
development.
I
mean
you're
doing
a
great
job
and
I
have
nothing
against
this
rap
model.
I
I
know
it's
going
to
be
modified
with
governance
2.0,
but
at
the
moment
I
think
this
investment
is
only
voted
by
rep
holders
right,
so
I
I
might
be
mistaken,
but
and
other
things
that
I
wanted
to
say
yeah,
that's
basically
everything
I
wanted
to
say.
I
I'm
a
bit
puzzled
on
this
50
involvement
by
community
members.
I
mean
it's
great
in
general
potentially
to
have
this,
but
where
was
this
discussed
before
announcing
it
right?
So
it
seems
like
an
internal
discussion
that
you
had
internally
between
reporters.
I
I
don't
know
if
there
was
a
an
announcement
in
twitter
or
something
inviting
all
these
the
holders
to
join
this
group
or
not.
But
to
me
that
was
I
I
felt
like
it
was
like
announced
as
an
internal
discussion
and
yeah.
And
finally,
the
last
point
I
have
is
that
it's
very
difficult
to
follow
these
calls.
I
mean
these
are
great.
I
Like
me,
let's
say
that
maybe
now
I
have
time
to
follow,
but
in
three
months
maybe
I'm
busy
with
my
work-
and
I
don't
have
time
to
spend
hours
in
youtube
following
everything,
so
I
think
it's
very
important
to
have
a
forum,
a
paper
trade
right,
so,
where
you
know
things
are
expressed
and
discussed
in
details
on
the
forum,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
giving
pointers
to
the
calls
or
something
like
this.
I
So
these
are
just
my
comments,
so
I
have
nothing
against
this
investment
50
000
dollars
is
not
a
huge
amount
for
dxdo,
but
still
I
feel
is
it's
a
bit
premature
perhaps
to
to
to
go
into
this,
even
if
it
is
a
great
opportunity.
I
understand
this
for
the
reasons
that
I
explained
so.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
attention.
H
I
thought
you
all
had
a
lot
of
great
points,
especially
expressed
on
the
forum
as
well.
One
thing
that
we
actually
all
discussed
amongst
ourselves,
because
the
way
dx
ventures
was
was
formed
was
kind
of.
I
think,
once
it
started
with.
It
became
very
clear
that
the
amount
of
research
that's
involved
in
deciding
whether
something's
a
good
investment
or
not
is
is
quite
a
bit
right
and
if
we're
using
other
people's,
you
know
basically
money
raised
through
the
bonding
curve.
H
So
one
thing
that
has
been
discussed,
something
that
skye
set
up
was
a
meeting
with
some
individuals
from
metacartel
who
could
be
doing
more
of
a
proper,
fully
fledged
deal
memo,
and
I
think
that
could
be
something
that
would
be
really
good
in
the
future
to
include
on
any
post
kind
of
explaining
the
viability
of
any
anything
that
dx
ventures
wants
to
get
behind
to
maybe
success
out
these
bigger
questions
in
a
more
like,
thorough,
but
also
quick
way
regarding
the
the
the
contributor
investment
portion.
H
That's
something
that
I
think
we
all
need
to
I
mean.
If
people
have
opinions
on
it,
we
can
either
decide
to
not
do
the
contributor
investment
any
longer
or
how
do
we
basically
think
about
opening
it
up
to
a
wider
community?
H
I
think
that
it
could
cause
some
some
issues,
maybe
with
like
liability
and
things
like
that
when
it's
such
a
risky
high-risk
environment,
that
you
know
people
might
be
investing
in
something
they
don't
realize
that
there's
like
really,
you
know
who
knows
what
the
level
of
return
is
going
to
be
on
it.
So
there
might
be
some
efficacy
issues
in
that,
as
well
as
a
dow.
H
If
we're
just
opening
things
up
for
you
know-
and
it's
also
a
question
of-
does
the
you
know
the
individual
founder
want,
you
know
basically
to
be
something
similar
to
like
a
token
raise
or
something
like
that
from
the
dow.
Maybe
they
just
want
to
you
know,
do
like
very
known
entities
investing
in
in
their
their
their
first
round
or
seed
round
of
investments,
so
it'd
be
good
to
get
others
feedback
about
that
question
of
contributor
investments
in
projects
going
forward.
B
Yeah,
just
from
tammy
and
and
our
new
all
really
good
points
on
on
the
on
the
additional
investment,
so
in
general,
the
idea
of,
if
you,
if
you
go
back
and
look
at
the
history
of
the
discussions
around
the
idea
of
dx
ventures
before
it
was
even
dx
ventures
and
then
the
post
about
the
idea
of
dx
ventures.
B
You
will
the
way
I
interpret
it
and
everyone
have
their
own
interpretation
is
it.
It
is
never
outlined,
as
like
a
professional
venture
entity
arm
within
dx
dow
that's
going
to
have
like
full-time
professional
people
looking
at
it
and
executing
like
deals
based
on
like
what
is
the
average
return
expected
over
the
next
five
years
of
holding
this
investment
like
how
how
vcs
and
private
equity
companies
look
right.
Nowhere
does
it
like
outline
that
kind
of
like
background
of
it.
B
So
the
question
is
like
what
is
it
right
and
I
I
shared
in
the
forum
how
I
interpret
it.
Other
people
have
different
may
have
different
opinions.
B
I
also
like
rf
noob
would
love
if
some
of
the
1600
dxd
and
other
rep
holders
would
also
share
their
ideas
and
how
they
think
about
it
in
the
forum
as
well,
but
like
to
rf
noob,
which
is
you're
relatively
new
here,
like
in
general
yeah,
a
lot
of
times,
forum
posts
which
are
really
interesting
like
get
posted,
and
there
will
be
like
a
couple
discussions
and
everyone
always
hopes
that
there's
more
discus
wishes.
There
was
more
discussion
and
productive.
B
You
know
asynchronous
forum,
public
discussions
around
topics
and
a
lot
of
times
like
people
heart
it
and
they're.
Like
oh,
sounds
like
a
great
idea.
I
heart
that
and
then
like
no
one
right,
no
one,
so
no
one
writes
anything
in
more
detail.
So,
like
increasing
the
forum,
answers
and
questions,
and
what
are
the
doubts
I
agree
is
like
really
important
to
do
and
maybe
more
effective
on
the
forum
than
in
calls,
because
then
anyone
like
dxd
holders,
anyone
could
just
follow
it
in
one
forum
thread,
which
is
great.
B
So
some
people
like
chris
does
a
really
good
job
of
putting
any
topic,
and
we
can
start
to
put
like
any
topic
in
the
forum
and
have
more
discussion
and
then
like
to
the
conflict
of
interest
thing.
The
only
reason
why
we
ever
considered
adding
additional
funds
into
this
actual
venture
opportunity.
B
The
only
reason
is-
and
we
even
question
opolis
like.
Why
do
you
have
this
mechanism?
Where,
like
the
more
you
invest
the
better
terms
you
get?
If
you
would
invest
5x
the
amount
of
money
you
get
25x,
better
numbers
right
and
it's
like
well.
Why
do
you
do
that?
And
it's
because
they
didn't
like?
Oh,
we
didn't
want
tons
of
like
small
tickets
right.
We
rather
have
like
bigger
size
tickets.
It's
just
easier
and
you
know
maybe
it's
more
effective.
So
the
only
reason
we
ever
anyone
ever
started.
B
Thinking
about
like
should
we
put
additional
money
in
to
the
dx
ventures.
Money,
which
is
the
point
of
dx
ventures,
is
to
use
dx
dao's
money.
The
only
reason
anyone
ever
mentioned,
that
is,
to
get
dx
dow,
better
terms
on
this
investment
into
opolis
right,
and
so
the
question
is:
how
are
we
going
to
get
extra
money
to
get
better
terms
for
dx
dow,
and
we
talked?
B
Should
we
open
it
to
the
like
dx,
dow
community
or
just
dx,
dow
contributors
or
dxd
holders,
and
very
quickly
you
get
to
if
it's
like
dxd
community,
that
no
matter
how
you
look
at
it?
It's
basically
the
public.
So
it
becomes
a
public
opportunity
and
how
do
you
manage
a
public
opportunity
of
taking
money
from
the
public
and
then
giving
it
to
opolis
as
a
dx,
dow
dx
ventures,
investment?
B
The
only
way
that
we
came
up
with
is
to
limit
it
to
you
know,
trusted
full-time
contributors
that
actually
have
reputation
and
get
paid
by
dicks
down
on
a
monthly
basis,
and
that
was
the
proposed
thing
in
the
in
the
forum,
and
that
was
it
was
open
to
those
it
was
never
open
to
the
public.
B
For
I,
I
think
the
like,
like
the
risk,
like
liability,
legal
reasons
like
people
coming
and
saying
what
did
dxdow
get
me
into
like
those
risks
alone
are
like
scary,
right
and
then
there's
like
is
is:
is
dx
dao
supposed
to
be
investing
other
people's
money
like
some
like
there's
things
like
duck,
dao
and
other
investment
communities
which
have
tokens
and
they
have
communities
and
they
have
access
tokens
and
things
like
that,
and
so
dx
ventures
is
never
has
never
done
any
of
that
and
had
doesn't
even
never
had
a
plan
to
do
any
of
that.
B
So
I
think
that's.
The
main
reason
why
it
was
kind
of
cl
was
pretty
closed
right,
and
so
at
this
point
it's
like
should,
like
those
people
be
able
to
invest-
maybe
maybe
not
should
they
be
able
to
vote
on
the
proposal
even
saying
people
saying
no.
So
there
is
a
highlighted
conflict
of
interest
here
which
is
really
relevant,
and
so,
if
you
had
to
choose
between
two
options,
which
is
from
now
on,
we
just
use
dx
dow's
money
for
dx
ventures
or
we
we
let
the
entire
public
come
in
behind
dx
venture
investments.
B
B
Like
returns
of
that
investment,
those
things
make
that
a
no-go.
You
cannot
open
this
to
the
public.
So
then,
if
the
two
options
are
we,
we
should
just
use
dx
dow's
money
and
we
should
not
do
any
individual
contributions.
That's
so
that's
my
kind
of
overall
summary
but
happy
to
put
that
in
the
forum.
That's
yeah,
that's
like
two.
Maybe
too.
J
Detailed
but
yeah
yeah,
I
want
to
maybe
chime
in
here.
I
think
I
think
generally
you're
right
and
like
I'll
just
say
that
in
the
let's
say
in
the
case
of
opolis
originally
spoke
to
john,
and
he
said
like,
like
the
d
style
itself,
doesn't
need
to
manage
everyone's
funds
like
if
I'm
investing
with
the
digs
out,
I
can
transfer
the
funds
directly
to
opolis
and
it'll
be
considered
in
that
kind
of
whatever
the
the
the
exile
investment.
J
J
B
Yeah,
that's
basically
it
nylon
like
you.
We
know
how
duck
down
these
communities
work.
If
you
say
any,
this
is
open,
like
anyone
can
invest
in
this.
This
early
round
of
opelus
just
say
that
you're
with
vxdao
and
send
money
from
your
wallet
and
then
they
get
like
hundred
wallets.
You
think
opolis
wants
that.
No.
K
How
like,
if
you
want
to
do
it
as
like
knock
down
these
other
groups,
that
tactile
is
a
group
investing,
so
the
money
is
sent
to
dak,
tao
and
then
money
from
the
house
and
to
to
the
company.
So
it's
not
each
and
every
person
investing
there
will
never
be
like
individuals
investing
and
there's
many
reasons
for
that.
Many
many
projects
once
kyc
right
and
sometimes
all
you
need
is
one
kyc
one
person
takes
takes
the
takes
the
kyc.
E
Yeah
and
the
opulence
tokens
are
actually
vested
so
like.
Overall,
I
think
it
was
a
mistake
to
include
like
rep
holders
and
slash
full-time
contributors
into
the
dx
venture
project.
I
think
we
should
actually
get
rid
of
that
and
just
have
a
clean
dx
ventures
just
putting
dx
star
funds
invest
basically
just
from
the
dx
down
just
to
have
like
a
clear
without
any
conflict
of
interest,
which
we
have
right
now,
like
I'm
fine
with
not
voting,
but
it's
not
something
which
is
scalable.
C
E
Additional
funds
from
from
the
rep
holders
or
full-time
members
now
with
opolis
or
that's
like
the
only
time
and
the
next
time
like
this,
is
not
going
to
happen.
I
B
The
optimal
would
be
250k
like
if
you
do
250k
you
get
the
best
optimal
purse
percentages
and,
like
return
so.
I
If
that's
the
the
what
you
think
is
best,
why
not
proposing
this,
but
at
that
point
you
know,
I
think
it
would
make
sense
to
to
discuss
this
with
dxd
holders
and
if
they
do
not
participate
in
the
forum.
Perhaps
it's
better.
You
know
to
wait
for
governance
2.0
right.
So
that's
my
feeling.
So
this
thing
thing
seems
a
bit
accelerated
to
me.
I
I
understand
that
oppo
is
the
opportunity
is
now
so
I
I
don't
mind
at
this
investment
just
to
be
clear,
but
in
general
to
me
it
seems
necessarily
accelerated
compared
to
many
other
things
that
are
done
very
carefully
and,
following
you
know,
step
by
step
index.
Doubt
these
things
to
me
even
a
discussion.
We
are
having
suggest
that
something
to
do
to
do
slowly
and
perhaps
asking
dxt
holders
on
chain.
Basically.
D
I
don't
really
have
a
strong
opinion
on
this,
but
if
we
do
go
with
250,
I
feel
like
we're
also
kind
of
falling
into
the
formal
marketing
trap
of
opolus
right.
B
250
250
in,
in
my
mind,
is
a
no
go
because
that
doesn't
fit
into
the
whole
point
of
dx
ventures
and
what's
been
outlined
for
dx
ventures.
To
do
so,
we
can't
do
250
because,
because
that's
not
that's
not
what
dx
ventures
does
we'd
have
to
do
like
a
whole,
separate
request
and
proposal
outside
of
dx
ventures
to
do
an
investment
like
that.
H
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
We
can
do
that
and.
B
Move
forward
from
there,
okay,
so
so
is,
is
the
is
the
snapshot
to
dxd
holders,
which
we've
we've
experimented
with
in
the
past
on
a
few
different
proposals?
B
Is,
is
dx
ventures
like
what
makes
it
specifically
that
dxd
holders?
We
should
get
the
the
signal
proposal
from
dxd
holders
versus
like
spending
money
for
other
things
from
the
dow
like
do
then
why
shouldn't
we
get
their
signal
proposed
like
signal
feeling
every
time
dx
dow
spends
money,
yeah
great
question,
why
why
is
it
specific
to
dx
ventures?
I
guess
is
my
question.
Question.
E
Dx
holder
right
now
raised
concerns,
so
that's
like
one
big
reason
and
like
in
general,
dx
ventures
was
always
meant
to
be
rep
holders
deciding
not
deciding
sorry
proposing,
but
the
dxo
at
the
end
of
the
day
will
ratify
the
proposal
right.
So
in
general,
I
don't
think
we
should
always
include
snapshot
proposals.
This
is
just
like
a
mistake.
We
did
and
we
just
need
to
get
contents
from
dxd
owners.
A
It's
probably
like
a
good
idea
to
start
getting
that
signal
before
we
just
like
flip
the
switch
you
know
for
that,
gov
2.0,
so
yeah.
I
like
the
idea
of
incorporating
more
things
into
this.
C
So
I
think
it
makes
sense
that
the
process
is
evolving
and
just
like
a
reminder
that
I
think
the
main
mission
here
is
to
support
pain
points
that
dx
now
has
and
opulis
addresses
a
very
important
pain
point
for
dx
doubts
basically
do
anything
at
all
by
paying
people
to
actually
develop
and
work
for
a
dow
that
does
not
have
a
legal
entity
like
base
somewhere.
So
I
just
want
to
like
make
sure
that
those
points
are
clearly
understood.
B
That
yeah,
it's
it's
pretty
interesting
tammy.
I
think
you
just
recently
shared
it,
but,
like
I
think
you
mentioned
that,
like
maker
planning
to
use
like
opolis
like
maker
is
a
real
doubt.
It's
like
one
of
the
first
real
dows
right
and
the
fact
that
they're
like
they
were
an
early
grant,
giver,
big
participant
and
they're.
Actually
planning
to
like
use
opelus
for
to
solve
the
needs
of
maker.
Actual
dao
is
pretty
pretty
big
signal,
which
is
cool.
H
So
it's
actually
just
to
clarify
it's
a
new
proposed
communications
arm
of
maker
dow
that's
gonna,
be
handling
all
of
their
like
communications
and
updates,
and
they
will
be
creating
an
s
corp
in
order
to
pay
these
individuals
and
in
order
to
do
that,
they're
thinking
about
using
opolis
in
order
to
deal
with
all
the
payroll
complexities
that
come
with
working
with
the
tao.
C
A
There's
a
whole
emergency
room
for
that
that
we
can
put
geronimo
in
to
discuss
maker
dao,
but
just
on
the
the
upload.
So
it
sounds
like
I
guess,
is
tammy
and
skye.
Gonna
lead
follow
things
up
from
from
here
and
along
maybe
the
lines
that
that
geronimo
laid
out.
B
Yeah
so
a
snapshot,
a
dxd
snapshot
and
have
two
options
and
and
only
use
dx
ventures.
Tx,
dow
money.
H
Yes
and
we'll
do
another
kind
of
preface
of
kind
of
what's
been
going
on
with
the
traction
and
the
point
of
dx
ventures
and
give
all
that
information
about.
You
know,
pain,
points
and
things
like
that.
Like
john
mentioned,
because
that
is
important.
A
Cool-
and
I
know
we're
running
late
here,
just
a
couple
other
things:
there
was
a
sky
had
a
post
in
the
forum
about
doing
a
dx
style,
community
competition
for
omen
markets.
This
is
something
we've
done
a
couple
months
ago
and
I
think
it's
something
I
think
it
was
only
1500
or
2000
die,
but
it
would
be
great
to
see
that
move
to
proposal.
Yes,
just
real,
quick
on.
B
That
so
we
learned
from
the
first
one
and
I'm
gonna
post,
like
you,
can
look
at
the
on
chain
like
results
and
all
that
stuff,
but
I'm
just
summarizing
it
I'll
share
that
in
the
forum
thread,
but
my
takeaways
that
I
can
gather
from
it
was
we
need
more
participants,
we
need
more
market
submissions,
we
need
better
markets,
we
need
more
rep
holders,
picking
the
markets,
and
then
we
need
rep
holders
to
be
better
at
picking
successful
markets
because
they're
the
ones
voting
on
this
competition.
B
So
there
were
a
couple
comments
about
like
focusing
on
getting
fewer
markets,
which
I'm
not
I
didn't
know
like
in
my
mind.
We
need
to
throw
more
money
at
the
whole
thing
to
get
the
attention
of
the
best
prediction
market
people
in
the
world
and
if
that
takes
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
like
get
the
best
prediction
market
people
in
the
world
that
know
the
best
markets
to
come,
join
omen
community
and
make
and
offer
markets
and
then
teach
rep
holders
how
to
pick
good
omen
markets
and
then
fund
those.
B
B
You
know,
take
the
first
competition
and
do
a
second
competition
with
like
on
steroids
and
like
overspend,
and
then
this
is
all
leading
into
omen,
token
and
stuff
so
like
it
can't
hurt
getting
like
if,
if,
if
the
defiant
says
like,
oh
my
god,
like
dx,
dow
just
made
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
like
omen,
market
competition
or
something
like
okay,
maybe
a
hundred
thousand
is
too
much
but
like
like
just
more
attention
rather
than
less
attention.
So
like,
let's
make
it
big,
that's
my
that's
my
point.
My
view.
A
Yeah,
absolutely,
I
think,
make
it
big
brian
awareness
driving
everything
and
just
as
we
gave
it
a
shout
out
on
monday's
call
about
omen.
A
lot
of
credit
to
cayden
who's
been
like
creating
a
lot
of
cool
markets
and
if.
C
A
Follow
him
on
twitter
he's
constantly
talking
about
omen
on
twitter.
So
a
lot
of
this
is
just
like
the
daily
grind
of
always
thinking
about
markets,
always
thinking
about
what
could
be
good
so
anyway,
all
right,
we'll
look
forward
to
that
and
then
melanie
just
hopped
off
the
call,
but
she
did
get
a
post
up
on
dow
talk
about
dxd
tracking,
so
obviously
with
the
vesting
contracts
and
gas
and
then
trying
to
get
that
settled
up
with
bottle
rocket.
A
There's
been
a
lot
of
dxd
that
has
been
earned
by
contributors
that
has
not
actually
been
issued,
and
so
this
spreadsheet
is
meant
to
be
the
place
that
we
can
track
and
is
what
the
the
the
bottleneck
bottleneck
is
really
the
bottle
rocket.
A
So
please,
this
is
not
going
on
blockchain,
yet
you're
not
going
to
do
your
dvd
yet,
but
this
will
be
the
basis
for
what
we're
going
to
be
using
when
we
need
to
tie
all
of
this
up
so
make
sure
you
check
that
going
back
and
then
also
be
on
the
lookout
for
another
sheet
like
this
coming
up
in
the
next
couple
weeks
as
it
relates
to
rep
awards,
because
we're
not
doing
the
same
process
there,
and
I
think
we
should
start
thinking
about
doing
around
making
some
rep
awards
on
mainnet.
A
L
I
just
want
to
say
something:
I
totally
agree
with
sky
about
upping
the
ante
on
the
bounty
for
almond.
I
think
we
should
have
many
categories
and-
and
we
should
also
consider
promising
people
talking
so
they
you
know
it's
like
on
boarding
some
someone
onto
a
startup
and
giving
them
equity.
You
know
they
have
interest
in
growing
this
in
the
future.
L
So
if
you
give
them
almond
tokens,
they
won't
sell
them
if,
if
they're
worth
say
twenty
dollars,
but
if,
if
they
create
markets
and
and
they,
you
know
kind
of
like
flower,
that
plant
that
you've
given
them
and
and
it
grows,
they
they'll
have
an
interest
in
participating
further
along
the
line,
and
you
don't
have
to
give
them
money
for
that.
You
know
they
they'll
just
be
focused
on
growing
their
token
value.
K
L
L
A
Over
a
bit
on
time,
we
did
get
started
a
little
bit
late,
but
it's
kind
of
we
want
to
hit
the
recording
and
then
probably
for
the
next
we're
going
to
take.