►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-04-28]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
dk
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
april
28th,
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup.
There
are
two
proposals
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
the
mainnet.
Both
are
actually
resubmissions
of
the
deposit
400
each
into
swapper
x.
I
proposal
this
is
one
that
passed
last
monday,
but
there
was
an
issue
with
the
transfer
from
the
dow
to
the
multi-sig.
B
So
there
was
a
new
relayer
contract,
an
e3
layer
contract
that
allows
heath
transfers
from
the
dow
to
the
multi-sig
that
was
deployed
by
gusto,
and
then
we
just
resubmitted
these
two
proposals.
The
first
one
is
a
proposal
for
five
eth
to
be
sent
just
so
we
can
test
out
the
new
e3
layer
and
then
the
rest
one
is
for
the
395
each.
B
So
then
that
will
eventually
find
its
way
into
xdi
swapper
on
xdi,
so
we'll
need
to
trade
and
convert
those
into
the
five
different
pairs
and
then
bridge
them
over,
and
then
it
will
need
to
go
through
the
proposal
process
on
nextdie.
But
I
think
this
is
important.
Important
component
of
increasing
liquidity
on
swapper
on
next
die,
so
hopefully
we'll
be
moving
forward
with
that
yeah
and
that's
it
for
mainnet
right
now,
just
those
two
proposals.
B
I
have
some
thoughts
on,
maybe
a
couple
others
we
want
to
get
to
in
a
second,
but
just
looking
at
the
current
ones,
on
xdi
for
right
now.
There's
a
proposal
for
I
think
it's
I
want
to
say
levitate
every
time
I
see
this
one
but
levothyate,
and
then
there
is
a
somewhat
exciting
proposal
for
slash
the
full
amount
for
the
compromise
account.
B
So
this
was
from
gemino's
proposal
and
we
actually
think
nylon
was
able
to
find
a
specific
amount
of
rep
down
to
like
18
decimals
that
the
attacker
had.
So
this
proposal
is
just
a
simple
subtraction
of
that
rep
there
and
so
yeah.
Hopefully
that
will
go
through
and
that
will
be
a
good
precedent
set
for
those
trying
for
being
able
to
slash
her
up
on
xdi
and
also
just
have
a
run
us
through
that
process.
Yeah.
C
Now,
on
to
find
nylon
was
able
to
pull
the
exact
amount
of
rep
using
a
a
graph
query
which
not
everyone
maybe
knows
how
to
do,
and
because
xdxdow
on
x
on
x
die
is
not
a
verified
contract.
I
think
you
can't
interact
with
it
on
using
block
scout,
which
it
would
be
good.
Obviously
if
we
could
interact
with
it
directly
using
block
scout
so
like
we
can
on
main
net
with
ether
scan.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
can
get
that.
C
C
D
Ide
for
ethereum,
so
you
should
be
able
to
interact
with
the
contract
and
you
know
run
everything
that
you
like,
as
you
would,
with
blog
scout
or
ether
scan.
D
I
can
maybe
make
a
tutorial
it's
not
very
difficult
to
like
query
the
graph
and
maybe
make
a
quick
tutorial
for
that,
and
but
anyway,
like
we
like,
we
should
probably
ask
them
to
verify.
I
think,
like
this
option
in
block
scout
is
fairly
new,
so.
B
Yeah
and
I
think
to
block
scout
is
doing
the
verification
themselves.
I
know
etherscan
does
that
and
I
guess,
when
you
verify
contract,
that
means
you
can
connect
your
web3
wallet
and
basically
interact
with
that
contract
with
the
functions
that
are
outlined
there
and
so
ether
scan,
I
guess
controls
the
verification
process
for
them,
but
for
block
scout.
How
does
that?
How
does
that
work.
D
D
And
then
you
can
interact
with
the
different
functions,
because
it's
not
fully
open
source,
I'm
not
sure
how
you
do
it
on
blogspot,
but
I
would
imagine
it's
the
same
thing
like
you
would
have
to
go
to
the
contract,
verify
it
and
then
enter
the
contract
of
the
code,
the
code
of
the
contract
and
then
you're
able
to
interact
with
different
functions.
C
D
In
ether
scan
it's
it's
anyone,
anyone
who
has
the
code
of
the
contract
in
I'm
not
sure
about
blah
blah
blah,
but
I
would
imagine
it's
the
same.
B
D
B
D
B
Cool
well,
I
think
it's
specifically
just
like
figuring
out
black
scout,
because
we
rely
on
that.
Everyone
knows
ether
scan
so
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
talk
about
this
offline
just
to
go
through
the
rest
of
the
proposals.
There
was
a
rep
boost
for
cabela,
which
is
outstanding
amount
from
the
first
rep
boost.
Cabela's
been
a
really
active
community
member
omen
key
base
in
the
in
the
discord
there
was
a
member
balance
or
payout
for
covering
a
usd
shortfall.
B
This
is
a
request
to
get
die
back
for
an
address
that
had
sent
usdc
to
xdxdow
because
it
needed
about
3
900
usdc
to
complete
a
swapper
liquidity
order.
So
this
is
just
a
member
balancer
for
that
there
is
the
proposal
to
retain
outside
counsel
for
dick
style,
which
I
think
should
pass
in
a
couple
days.
We
discussed
that
last
week
on
the
governance,
call
there's
pulp,
machina,
mainnet
repsync
good,
to
see
more
rep
being
claimed
on
xdi,
then
there's
a
software
development
for
dx
dow.
B
This
is
quail
codes
proposal,
they'll
pay
them
and
it
was
just
boosted
recently
and
then
there
is
the
dx
dow
discord
rep
boost
signal
proposal.
So
this
is
an
initiative
that
keenan
has
been
driving
to
give
rep
rewards
for
active
discord
contributors,
so
he
calculated
up
for
different
numbers,
and
I
think
this
is
something
he
plans
to
do.
We
plan
to
try
to
do
quarterly
as
a
way
to
give
like
another
different
types
of
rep
distribution
to
different
community
members.
B
So
I
think
this
is
a
a
good
initiative
and
there's
a
yes
the
signal
proposal.
I
think
I
just
boost
that
this
morning
there
so
we
can
vote
on
that
and
then
lastly,
there
is
a
add
busd
to
the
swapper
xdi
token
list
proposal.
So
any
questions,
thoughts,
comments
on
the
xdi.
B
Proposals
cool
and
then
just
because
I
mean
exercise
interesting
because,
like
typically
when
we
do
like
proposals,
everything
lasts
for
seven
days
on
mainnet,
but
this
is
x
died.
It's
five
days,
sometimes
like
proposals
get
submitted
and
voted
before
the
week
and
then
also
because
we
have
majority
votes.
That
also
happens
so
just
like
a
couple
of
a
couple,
two
proposals
that
passed
recently
so
the
exec
search
or
marketing
lead
actually
just
passed
last
night.
I
think
melanie
will
hit
on
that
later
and
then
this
is
kind
of
important.
B
B
This
was
to
create
the
farming
test
on
swapper
xdy,
so
there
was
two
proposals
to
fund
the
swapper
farming
relayer
and
then
one
proposal
to
actually
set
the
parameters
of
the
campaigns,
and
since
this
was
a
majority
rep
boost,
that
means
everyone
who
voted
for
it
voted
before
it
was
boosted,
and
you
need
to
go
back
and
redeem
the
proposal
to
reclaim
your
rep
right,
because,
basically,
the
way
that
the
system
works
is
every
time
you
vote
on
an
unboosted
proposal.
You
stake.
B
I
think
it's
point,
zero
four
percent
of
your
rep
on
that
proposal
and
therefore
you
can't
use
that
amount
of
rep
on
to
vote
on
other
proposals
until
that
proposal
is
passed
and
has
gone
through.
So
if
you
vote
on
those
proposals,
you
have
rep
that
is
not
yet,
and
you
haven't
claimed
that
you
have
rep.
That
is
not
able
to
be
claimed
at
least
be
able
to
use
for
other
proposals
right
now,.
F
Yes,
yeah,
that's
pretty
you
got
it
kind
of
both
right,
it's
.04
or
four
percent
of
rep
is,
is
locked
up.
I
think
on
most
of
these
schemes
and
it
sort
of
makes
sense
that
the
person
who
would
have
made
those
proposals
or
like
that,
nobody
boosted
it
because
there
was
sort
of
this
push
to
get
an
absolute
majority,
and
it
doesn't
need
to
be
boosted
if
it
ends
up
getting
an
absolute
majority.
B
B
F
B
F
It
was
really
impressive
to
see
how
quickly
I
think,
especially
the
second
one
passed
like.
I
think
it
was
like
a
matter
of
an
hour
or
something,
so
it's
really
cool
to
see
how
quickly
the
community
can
like
execute
and
move
on
something.
There
was
a
moment
there,
where
I
like
was
a
little
scared
that
the
second
one
was
not
gonna
make
it
because
of
all
this
rep.
That
was
locked
up
from
the
first
one.
I
was
like,
oh
my
god.
This
would
be.
F
Yeah,
like
two
percent
less.
C
Also
related
to
that,
like
in
that
case,
you
have
to
go
claim
your
rep.
That
was
staked
the
note
just
so
everyone
knows
the
notification
that
tells
you,
if
there's
something
for
you
to
claim,
does
not
work
on
xdi.
So
if
you've
ever
done
that
that
specific
action
before
or
you
staked
on
proposals,
you
need
to
go
find
the
proposals
that
you
did
something
on
and
go
redeem
find
the
redeem
button
on
that
proposal
and
redeem
whatever
you're
owed.
The
notification
thing
doesn't
work,
which
is
better.
F
But
they
do
have
some
support,
and
I
just
took
a
note
to
like
tell
them
about
this
bug,
because
it
is
pretty
annoying
one
like
kind
of
work
around.
That
is
like
at
least
thorough
if
annoying
would
be
to
go
to
block
scout
with
your
address
any
like
staking
that
you
had
done.
F
If
you
click
on
that
transaction,
where
you
did
the
staking,
you
can
see
a
proposal
id
in
on
block
scout
and
feel
free
to
dm
me
or
whatever
ping
me
about
how
to
do
this,
I'm
happy
to
help
you
get
the
proposal
id.
You
can
paste
that
into
the
alchemy
url
and
like
find
that
proposal
that
you
had
staked
on
and
then
you
should
be
able
to
redeem
from
there.
C
G
F
B
I
mean,
to
be
honest,
that's
actually
what
happened
with
me.
I
was
like
going
back
and
putting
these
proposals
in
and
then
I
just
like
clicked
on
the
link
and
I
was
like
oh
redeem
like
and
then
I
was
like.
Oh
that's
right,
like
you
kind
of
see
it,
and
so
now
I'm
just
looking
at
proposals
in
the
past.
C
Well,
chris,
I
I
I
don't
see
it
on
the
agenda,
but
in
recently
past
proposals,
so
we
the
I
don't
think
we
talked
about
last
week,
but
the
treasury
diversification
v2.
The
xdi
proposal
passed.
You
know
a
couple
days
before,
but
then
the
main
net
proposal
also
passed.
So
that
is
go
ahead.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
didn't
actually
put
anything
specific
on
the
agenda
with
that,
but
yeah.
So
now
let's
go
ahead
like
it's,
so
anyone
now
could
fulfill
or
submit
a
proposal
that
is
falls
into
those
conditions.
There's
actually
there's
actually
two
different
proposals
that
I
think
we
need
to
do
this
week
that
are
related
to
kind
of
bigger
ones.
B
So
one
we
need
to
do
some
type
of
transfer
to
xdi,
just
because
we're
about
like
150
000
xdi
now,
and
we
all
we
have
some
weft
there,
but
it's
a
little
bit
less.
So
I
imagine
we
probably
want
to
do
just
like
a
hundred
eth
proposal
that
transfers
x
die
there.
So
that's
one
and
then
the
second
one
is
is
what
sky
mentioned.
B
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
someone
to
start
the
the
first
treasury,
the
first
proposal
that
falls
under
the
treasury
authorization
proposal
v2,
and
so
that
would
you
just
need
to
follow
the
the
conditions
laid
out
in
that
proposal.
B
And
he
thought
just
quickly
on
the
x
stack.
I
was
thinking
I
wanted
to
submit
that
today.
So
we
could
get
those
funds
in
is,
do
we
need
more
wealth,
or
do
we
just
kind
of
want
x
die?
I
mean,
I
think,
we've
been
primarily
using
it
for
funding
things
right
and
that's
what
knows
the
x
die
is
coming
out.
B
Some
people
are
claiming,
or
some
people
are
requesting
weft,
but
just
for
we
have
150,
000
x,
die
and
then
98.5
weft
and
I
think
the
west
there's
really
there's
only
about
five
withdrawals,
so
I
think
it
probably
makes
sense
just
to
do
a
hundred
eighth
transfer,
that's
converted
to
xdi,
but
I
wanted
to
see
if
anyone
else
had
any
other
thoughts.
F
F
To
include
some
usdc
for
the
purposes
of
like
the
payments
like,
I
know
like,
for
example
like
phil,
is
the
auditor,
like
you,
know,
he's
exiting
through
usdc,
so
like
it's
just
makes
it's
one
step
easier.
If.
F
E
F
B
Yeah
definitely
the
usdc.
I
think
that's
a
good
point,
any
any
other
thoughts
on
on
the
funding.
This
is
separate
from
swapper
liquidity.
We
have
separate
proposals
for
that
and
and
now
it
gets
a
question
in
terms
of
the
process,
I've
kind
of
just
been
using
the
previous
authorization
posts,
and
I
think
you
know
the
the
fun
transfers.
B
Our
fault
are
kind
of
clear
under
that,
because
we're
really
funding
another
base,
but
we've
been
pretty
clear
that
this
does
these
type
of
trades
do
not
fall
under
the
treasury
authorization
proposal,
a
diversification,
authorization
and
I
think
that's
right.
We
should
continue
to
do
that
and
maybe
we
should
think
about
the
specific
frequency
of
these
transfers
just
so
we
can
automate
them
a
little
bit
by
dave,
and
I
were
talking
a
little
bit
about
this.
B
So
in
the
proposals
that
have
gone
on
xdi,
the
first
one
said
500.
B
When
we
got
to
like
300
or
400
000,
it
was,
we
should
increase
it
primarily
because
we're
going
to
put
swapper
liquidity
and
swapper
in
there.
So
I
feel
like
the
swapper,
the
assets
and
swapper,
like
I
feel
like
shouldn't
count
or
like
those
are
more
like
investments
in
products,
but
in
general,
like
I,
don't
think
we
should
have
more
than
we
don't
need
more
than
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
xdi
to
fund.
C
Well,
even
if
the
bridge
disappeared,
I
guess
you
could
still
use
the
money.
The
next
time,
but
anyway,
like
like
10
million
dollars
of
the
doubt
of
dxo's
treasury,
is
like
a
number
that
people
are
comfortable
with
having
on
x,
die,
which
is
another
chain,
or
is
it
more
than
that,
or
is
it
less
than
that
or
something
like
that?
H
B
It's
literally
gonna
say
the
exact
same
thing.
It's
like
it
feels
kind
of
right
like
10,
is
that's
kind
of
where
we
probably
shouldn't
go
above
that
right,
because
if,
if
things
exploded,
we
lost
10,
that
would
be
really
really
bad,
but
it
would
not
be
crippling
and
we'd
have
everything,
but
10
is
still
pretty
significant
right.
I
mean
the
portfolio,
I
mean
we're,
that's
like
six
or
seven
million
dollars
right.
So
if
we
think
we
got
five
million
of
that
in
swapper,
like
that's
a
good,
that's
a
good
chunk.
F
Weighing
risks
against
like
what
the
ambition
is
right
and
I
mean
and
we're
doing
pretty
well
on
next
night-
I
mean
I
think
swapper
could
potentially
be
like
the
best
exchange
on
next
time.
If
we
kind
of
keep
going
with
the
development
and
the
liquidity
and
stuff
I
mean,
obviously
it's
still
behind
honey
swap
and
bow
swap
with
the
farming.
F
Well,
there's
some
like
tail
risk
that,
like
extang,
gets
shut
down
because
it's
too
centralized
and
somebody
gets
like
you
know-
the
governments
go
after
the
validators
or
something
something
like
that
could
happen,
and
you
just
want
to
like
yeah,
have
some
kind
of
measured
balanced
view
on
that.
H
I
guess
it
changes
all
the
time
as
well
right
as
chains
mature
or
become
worse.
I
mean
it
would
be
awesome
if
one
day
of
course,
x,
die
is
self-sufficient
right,
like
that
the
products
on
x
die
generate
enough
revenue
to
to
cover
the
cost.
I
would,
of
course,
be
awesome,
but
yeah
10
percent
sounds
reasonable.
I
guess
to
start.
B
That
is
a
good
point
that
our
revenue
generation
is
highest
on
extent
right,
we're
actually
generating
kind
of
some
real
revenue
there,
both
obviously
the
protocol
fee.
You
know
it's
a
0.0025
of
each
trade
dx
takes
dow
is
getting,
but
also
the
assets
that
are
deployed
are
gaining
trade
fees,
earning
trade
fees.
H
F
Right,
which
is
like,
I
guess,
a
little
bit
un
and
you
give
it
to
like
we.
We
want
to
like
track
that
and
eventually
like
make
sure
it's
going
because
right,
like
the
the
idea,
is
to
deliver
that
right
to
the
bonding
curve,
at
least
another
current
model.
I
think,
and
but
yeah
I
mean
it's
pretty
cool
if
we
could
get
to
a
million
dollars
a
day.
F
I
think
we're
kind
of
consistently
above
100k
in
volume,
between
midnight
and
ecstatic
lately
and
like
a
million
dollars
a
day
is
about,
like
you
know,
90k
per
year
in
protocol
fees
and
then
10
times
that,
if
all,
if
all
of
that,
like
liquidity,
was
the
established
liquidity,
it's
like
10
times
that,
like
just
the
swap
liquidity
fees
overall,
so
I
mean
that
starts
to
be
meaningful
right.
It
like
can,
can
really
like
impact
our
budget
and
profits,
and
it's
pretty
cool
and
like
yeah.
Hopefully
we
keep
that
up.
B
C
C
F
Well,
so
I
think,
as
long
as
we
are
like
keeping
as
long
as
we
have
a
holistic
picture
on
like
that,
includes
the
liquidity
in
the
products
as
like
part
of
the
diversification
strategy.
Right,
like
I
mean
I
think,
it's
better
to
earn
revenue,
while
also
diversifying
right,
which
is
like
there's
other
reasons
to
do
that
right,
which
is
like
we
don't
know.
F
If
there's
going
to
be
a
bear
market
like
we
want
to
have
revenues
like
we
want
to
have
runway
secured
for
at
least
a
few
years,
I
would
say
five
years
so
if
we
can
like
meet
that
goal,
while
also
earning
on
that
money,
then
like
yeah,
it's
a
win-win.
B
Yeah
and
I
think
eath
die
or
eat,
usdclp
is
a
great
part
of
is
a
great
part
of
portfolio
that
also
includes
just
stable
coin,
yielding
right,
because,
like
that's
going
to
be
that
that's
a
part,
it's
one
allocation,
but
I
think
earning
fees
and
also
being
exposed
a
little
bit
to
the
the
the
price
of
is
a
good
part
of
the
overall
portfolio
structure.
B
Cool
all
right,
so
I
will
we'll
do
an
x-die
transfer
proposal
and
then
we
should
think
about
another
treasury
authorization
proposal
moving
forward
with
that
yeah
and
then
I
think
that
was
it
for
proposals
that
were
out
there
next
to
talk
about
is
want
to
give
an
update
on
the
dxd
buyback
so
just
before,
or
during
or
on
it
seemed
that
the
code
for
the
swapper
liquidity
relayer
has
been
released
and
then
there's
now
some
steps
for
the
multi-call
installation.
B
So
I
think
that
community
member
computer
members
will
be
able
to
deploy
that
shortly.
I
don't
know
if
john
or
federico
want
to
comment
on.
F
Yeah
exactly
basically,
this
testing
has
gone
well
on
x-tie
for
the
swapper
farming
liquidity
relayer,
which
basically
means
the
code
is
ready.
I
just
made
the
public
announcement
and
so
now
we're
just
waiting
for
the
community
to
do
the
deployments
and
we'll
see
that
you
know
I
mean
typically,
like
you
know,
with
product
releases
and
stuff.
This
usually
takes,
like
you
know,
less
than
a
day
before
you'll
see
a
proposal
to
so
we're
just
waiting
for
that
now.
B
Sweet-
and
this
does
say
relay
or
everything
is
a
relayer-
I
guess
in
a
way,
but
so
this
one
is
the
farming
liquidity
relayer.
So
this
would
allow
these
dow
to
interact
with
the
farming
contracts
that
like
power,
swapper,
and
so
this
was
what
we
did.
B
We
did
this
on
xdi
last
week,
and
that
was
what
the
test
proposal
was
for,
but
it's
important
for
this
multi-core
scheme
to
basically
connect
and
be
have
whitelisted
all
of
the
different
relayers
we
have-
and
I
guess
now
we
have
a
gnosis
protocol
relayer,
a
swapper
liquidity
relayer,
which
deposits
liquidity
into
swapper
and
then
a
farming
liquidity
relayer,
which
interacts
with
the
the
farming
contracts.
B
F
Yeah
some
some
of
this
is
a
function
of
we're
a
little
constrained
with
our
current
governance
contracts,
where
they
can't
do
approves
right.
So
that
sort
of
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
you
need
like
a
relayer,
sometimes
other
times,
you
just
have
all
this
other
stuff.
You
need
to
like
be
done
that
you
want
like
a
relayer
for
but
yeah.
I
think,
like
eventually
work
we'll
like
have
more
flexibility
with
the
the
newer
government
systems
that
will
develop
and
also
like
you
know
this
discussion
about
the
multi-state.
F
F
B
Cool
yeah
so
that
that'll
be
exciting
and
then
just
going
along
with
that
tammy
and
my
myself
and
a
couple
others
and
working
on
documentation
to
try
to
explain
and
provide
some
structure
to
what
this
buy-back
program
would
be,
and
I
think
you
know
thinking
about
how
the
treasury
authorization
proposal
laid
out
the
parameters
of
what
dx
dow
was
trying
to
do,
and
then
it
was
up
to
specific
proposals
that
would
fall
within
those
parameters
to
actually
execute
on
those
trades.
And
so
that's
that's
similar.
B
What
we're
doing
here,
this
is
meant
to
be
a
signal
proposal
that
will
include
all
the
information
about
what
the
buyback
would
look
like
and
then
we'll
get
that
approved
by
rep
holders,
and
then
there
will
be
separate.
Proposals
can
be
proposed
by
anyone
that
are
dxd
buyback
orders
that
fall
into
the
parameters
outlined
on
that
and
then
those
orders
themselves,
of
course,
will
be
relying
on
the
relay
contracts
that
we
were
just
the
the
gp
relayer
contract
that
we
were
just
discussing.
F
E
F
E
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
totally
pro
you're,
just
using
xdi,
it's
faster,
it's
cheaper.
The
whole
rap
base
can
vote
and
participate
at
the
end
of
the
day.
We
want
to
buy
back
as
quick
as
possible
because
dxdow
is
very
undervalued,
so
I
really
just
care
about
buying
back
dc
as
cheap
as
it
is
right.
E
F
B
Yeah,
that's
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
thinking,
especially
because
you
can
do
x
dive
first,
because
I
think
there's
something
I
mean,
like
main
net
is
center
stage
right.
It's
kind
of
like
get
some
attention
and
I
think
I
actually
think
we're
noticing
this
a
little
bit
with
swapper.
Now,
like
I
think,
even
if
mainnet
is
very,
very
crowded,
I
think
we
need
to
be
devoting
resources
and
attention
to
swapper
mainnet,
just
as
a
way
to
build
it
up.
B
So
it
gains
some
legitimacy
right,
and
so
I
think,
with
this
it
would
kind
of
be
the
same
thing.
There's
a
dxt
there's
like
a
good
dxd
market
on
xdi
like
it's
all
on
swapper.
We
kind
of
all
have
that,
but
I
think
we
also
want
to
like
compete
on
on
on
main
net
too,
so
I'd
be
in
favor.
Both.
J
Yeah,
I
think
that
one
thing
we
could
do
is
we
were
sorry
it's
my
dog,
so
one
thing
we
could
do
is
focus
the
swapper.
I
know
we're
trying
to
do
some
swapper
liquidity
as
well
from
the
buyback.
So
we
could
focus
some
of
that
as
well
onto
onto
the
onto
the
xdi
buyback
part
and
then
whatever
we
put
in
the
main
treasury,
you
know
because
we're
not
putting
everything
into
swapper.
We
can
put
that
from
the
main
net
repurchase.
B
That's
a
really
good
point,
because
there's
no
x
dxd
in
dx
in
xdx
style
right
now.
So,
presumably,
if
we
want
to
have
deke
style,
providing
liquidity
on
x
die,
we
need
to
somehow
get
dxd
over
there,
so
it
might
actually
just
be
easier
to
buy
the
dxd
on
xdi.
For
that.
E
Yeah
and
martin
made
a
good
point,
like
our
products
are
not
active
on
maintenance
besides
swapper,
but
I
think
our
products
are
kind
of
like
we
are
focusing
ourselves
completely
on
exeter.
So
why
not
just
use
accent.
F
I'm
looking
at
something
go
ahead,
I
kind
of
agree
with
all
of
the
above
and
like
the
the
dual
approach,
I
think,
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
I
think
just
to
add
in
there
is
another
like
wrinkle
to
this,
which
is
an
anxiety
around
the
fact
that
we're
using
or
like
you
know
at
least
the
plan
has
been
to
use
gnosis
protocol
v1,
but
at
the
same
time,
like
gnosis,
is
looking
to
basically
sunset
gnosis
protocol.
F
My
expectation
is
that
things
will
be
able
to
work
just
fine
for
like
the
near
term,
but
like
eventually
we
need
to
move
to
something
else,
and
so
I
do
have
a
little
bit
of
anxiety
around
like
the
fact
that
we're
beholden
to
a
platform
that
is
actively
being
sunset
but,
like
I
said,
I
think,
they've
indicated
that
it
they'll
like
help
us
and
support
things
for
the
near
term.
F
But
in
the
back
of
my
mind,
I'm
like
there
is
some
outside
chance
that
we
would
need
to
scramble,
and
I
think
the
easiest
backup
would
be
to
do
a
buy
back
through
swapper
itself
but
yeah.
Sorry,
general.
E
So
if
we
do
both
networks,
both
one
right.
F
They
could
both
be
tp
v1,
I
mean
the
other,
the
the
backup
that,
like
the
next
alternative,
I
had
in
mind,
was
doing
it
directly
on
swapper,
and
that
would
that's
attractive
as
a
next
option,
because
it
requires
kind
of
relatively
small
modifications
to
the
swapper
liquidity
relay
like
you
know,
we
basically
add
the
buy
function
instead
of
the
deposit
potion
and
then
that
thing
works
somewhat.
Similarly,.
B
If
we
do
like
one
buyback
on
so
we
do,
we
do
a
single
buyback
on
gnosis
protocol
v1
that
works
well,
but
then
gp1
v1,
like
shuts
down
completely
we're
kind
of
left.
I
think
that
that
buyback
and
the
things
we're
talking
about
with
swapper
farming
can
drive
liquidity
to
dxd
on
swapper
xdi,
so
that
we
should
be
able
to
more
easily
even
make
good
trades
right
and
especially
the
size
that
we're
doing
so.
I
think
if
the
if
gpu
v1
does
not
work
out
or
like,
we
don't
think,
that's
a
long-term
solution.
B
A
F
Probably
about
a
week
like
we
need,
like
you,
know,
a
day
or
two
of
development
and
then
like
a
couple
days
of
auditing,
and
of
course
it
just
needs
to
be
like
worked
into
people's
schedules,
but
yeah.
The
problem
with
that
on
mainnet
is
like
to
install
it.
You
then
have
to
do
another
multi-call,
which
takes
three
weeks
to
think
that
yeah,
so
I
mean
it's.
A
In
that
case,
why
don't
we
use
gpv
one
for
mainnet
and
and
while
it's
running
use
that
one
week,
while
it's
running
on
mainnet
on
gpv1,
to
do
the
modification
and
kick
off
from
the
second
week
on
x
time
with
swapper
like
do
both.
F
Yeah
I
mean
it's,
maybe
even
possible
to
like
reverse
that
and
like
while
we're
we're
installing
the
multi-color
and
maintenance
get
the
swapper
version
installed
on
x9
and
actually
get
that
going.
First,
I
mean
that
that
would
actually
from
a
technical
perspective.
I
think
that's
actually
like
a
timeline
we
can
do,
but.
B
F
E
John
one
like
if
we
do
multi,
mainnet
and
xdi
buyback,
I
think
xd
will
be
faster
to
be
ready
right.
We
also
need
to
add
a
multi,
the
new
multi-color
next
time.
F
Yeah
exactly
x
die.
We
can
be
faster
in
in
several
respects.
Like
I
mean
one,
one
reason
x
die
is
faster.
Is
there
is
no
white
list
on
the
multi
call?
The
reason
for
that
is
like
there's
just
less
funds
at
risk
on
on
the
x
diet
right
so
like
so
we're
more
comfortable
with
taking
that
approach
there
versus
mainnet,
where
there's
50
million,
we
have
a
more
conservative
approach
to
multi
call
so,
like
you
know,
there's
no
need
for
a
new
multi-call
installation.
F
F
B
Day
and
the
good
news
is
from
a
technical
perspective,
there's
like
no
difference,
I
mean
between
x,
I
and
maintenance.
So
it's
like
we're
outlining
the
same
process
that
we'd
be
going
through
the
same
technical
explainer
there
just
like
the
times
are
mostly
the
big
difference.
F
The
times
and
then
like,
I
think
the
other
thing
to
consider,
which
is
yeah
not
technical,
really
but
like
the
majority
of
dxd,
is
still
on
main
map.
But
if
you
think
about
it,
though,
like
gp,
gnosis
protocol
requires
a
deposit,
and
so
in
some
ways
it's
not
unlike,
like
you
know,
bridging
over
to
the
trust
assumptions
are
different,
like
gp,
you
know
is
like
a
smart
contract
on
ethereum.
B
B
Of
awesome,
switching
gears
melanie
wanted
to
get
some
updaters
on
contributor
ux.
K
Yes,
everyone
so
just
an
update
of
what
we're
doing
in
the
contributor
experience
squad
tim.
What,
tomorrow
we're
going
to
be
starting
the
process
with
trey
and
chase
from
position
to
find
our
marketing
lead.
I
will
update
everyone
when
we
have
more
information
about
the
candidates
coming
through
the
pipeline
internally,
we're
working
through
the
process
of
how
to
review
candidates
once
received
from
position
at
the
moment.
We
think
the
process
will
consist
of
an
extensive
review
of
all
candidate
prior
experience.
K
References
and
media
then
conduct
formal
interviews
with
each
candidate
identify
which
are
the
strongest
fits
for
the
role
after
screening
the
candidates.
We
are
hoping
to
have
at
least
three
or
four
really
great
candidates
to
present
to
the
expo,
and
then
we
decide
on
who
we
feel
can
best
take
on
this
position
together
and,
as
always,
we're
looking
for
more
contributors
to
join
us
in
an
updated
positions
list
with
the
just
their
descriptions
on
the
contributor
hub,
either
today
or
by
the
end
of
the
week.
K
At
the
moment,
we'd
like
to
bring
on
quite
a
few
new
contributors,
we're
looking
for
two
senior
web
three
front,
end
developers,
a
senior
solidity
engineer,
a
solidity
engineer:
a
ux
whiz,
an
asia
focused
marketing
guru,
a
product
support
manager,
a
qa
engineer
and
we're
also
discussing
bringing
on
a
few
low-level
marketing
contributors
for
each
product.
We
have.
K
In
addition,
we've
been
communicating
with
ethworks
to
provide
us
the
front-end
developer
for
swapper,
if
they're
able
to
provide
us
with
one
keep
an
eye
out
for
for
a
post
on
dow
talk
with
the
details
and
then
finally,
an
update
on
dxd
tracking
ali
has
gone
through
all
the
proposals
on
alchemy
to
track
the
most
accurate
version
of
dxp
allocations.
K
We
have
taken
into
account
issued
dxd
to
vesting
contracts
and
unissued
dxd,
which
should
be
rewarded
to
contributors
along
the
besting
stipulations
outlined
in
the
worker
compensation
guidelines.
I
will
be
reaching
out
to
each
of
you
individually
today
with
the
totals
and
breakdowns
of
how
much
issued
and
unissued
dxd
we
have
for
you.
I
will
send
you
all
individually
as
a
spreadsheet,
to
review
and
if
you
have
any
questions
or
find
any
discrepancies,
let
me
know,
and
we
can
talk
through
them
and
resolve
them
together.
B
F
And
there
is
a
one-year
cliff,
so
nothing
is
basically
really
like
outstanding
at
the
moment,
but
it
is
a
ticking
clock
on
the
you
know,
the
dxd
vesting
system
that
we'd
like
to
stand
up
that
block
rocket
had
started
and
a
little
update
on
that
is.
I
had
spoken
with
black
scale
and
he
is
interested
in
kind
of
taking
over
development
of
that
and
kind
of
bringing
it
home
in
terms
of
the
development
is
actually
starting
by
like
doing
more
of
an
audit
review
so
yeah.
B
Txt
and
we'll
do
this
for
rep
to
kind
of
develop
a
system
for
that
and
then
yeah.
If
there's
any
other
proposals
outstanding
check
in
with
melanie.
C
B
I
love
how
it's
like
a
certain
ringtone,
just
like
that
sounded
european.
It's
like
the
the
police
yeah.
So
I'm
thinking
mostly
about
the
tracking
component,
because
I
think
that's
a
very
important
thing
that
we
like
with
dc
right,
there's
like
we
need
to
make.
We
need
to
track
what
everyone's
do
and
then
we
need
to
like
actually
distribute
it
and
the
same
thing
with
the
rep.
B
We
need
to
devote
some
resources
to
figuring
out
how
to
do
the
distribution
of
rep
and
there's
some
options
out
there,
but
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
of
heavy
lifting
there,
but
I
think
just
from
the
contributor
ux
side,
the
most
important
ux
squad
side,
the
most
important
thing
they
can
do
is
tracking
the
rep.
C
B
That
we
should
definitely
instead
of
that.
I
think
the
only
way
we
get
to
that
is
if
we
get
this
sheet
just
because
the
last
two
or
three
months,
we've
we've
been
with
the
x,
I
think
there's
confusion,
but
I
agree
like
I
mean
it's
it's
if
we
did
like
three
or
four
month,
rep
sinks,
even
for
individuals
like
that
wouldn't
be.
If
gas
is
not,
you
know
we're
in
the
40s
and
50s.
It's
not
crazy.
Now.
C
F
Yeah,
I
think,
if
you're
talking
about
like
net
passing
like
20
proposals,
that
seems
like
a
reasonable
expense
for
the
doubt
to
kind
of
pursue
that
avenue
I
mean
potentially
similarly
with
like
dxd
best
thing
like
rolling
up
yeah
several
months
of
that
like
that
could
be
an
alternative.
Hopefully
we
get
like
the
kind
of
more
robust
system
up
and
running,
though.
B
But
yeah,
but
I
do
think
just
it
is
important
that
we
just
like
track
this
and
get
this
all
this
information
out
there.
Just
so
we
can
be
sure
on
whatever
we
end
up
doing
and
like
it
takes
a
lot
of
time
to
do
that,
because
it's
going
proposal
by
proposal
and
then
everyone's
gonna
have
questions
so
yeah.
C
I
mean,
I
guess
we're
not
doing
that
many
votes,
but
when
there's
going
to
be
an
important
vote,
we
want
the
latest
contributors
to
have
enough
rep
to
do
like
a
50
approval
if
needed,
or
something
like
that
yeah.
I
agree.
B
I
Yeah
sure,
well,
first
of
all,
we
receive
the
results
of
the
audit
of
the
smart
contract
that
are
going
to
be
used
in
the
the
export
application
and
where
the
it
went
pretty
well,
the
auditor
feel
identified
two
critical
issues,
which
is
good.
I
think
that
they
they
can
be
in
this,
in
a
specific
condition
that
the
auditor
presented.
They
can
cause
a
big
trouble,
but
those
conditions
are
very
are
very
hard
to
present.
I
And,
moreover,
if
we
have
a
clear
process
on
like,
I
think
we
do
on
which
addresses.
Do
we
allow
the
the
avatar
to
call
we
are
doing
with
a
multi
call,
where
every
time
that
we
are
going
to
deploy
a
new
multi-core
will
review
the
addresses
that
this
multi-core
is
going
to
be
calling
on
what
the
action
that
is
going
to
be
taken,
because
on
dx
vote,
what
we
have
is
a
permission
registry
that
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
allow
and
to
add
permissions
on
a
scheme
that
are
already
deployed.
I
I
So
what
has
been
done
is
the
the
audit
and
I
did
a
huge
refactor
on
on
the
application,
trying
to
load
the
information
in
a
more
optimized
way
and
creating
a
cache
of
all
the
data
that
is
needed
for
each
network.
I
Right
now
we
are
using
online
ringkevi,
but
we
are
going
to
have
a
cache
of
information
for
rink
by
xi,
arbitrome
that
we
are
going
to
be
updating
every
two
weeks
a
month,
something
like
that
and
it's
going
to
allow
the
app
to
work
independently,
connect
being
connected
directly
with
the
neural
network
and
fake
and
fetching
all
the
information
from
there.
So
we
are
going
to
be
testing
that
yeah.
That's
it
I'm
going
to
submit
the
proposal
for
for
what
I'm
going
to
be
working
on
that.
I
I
already
share
on
our
talk
on
the
version,
1.0
issues
and
tasks,
and
we
were
talking
with
chris
or
about
setting
a
bi-weekly
call
on
related
with
dx
vote,
where
we
can
review
more
review,
discuss
or
and
prioritize
on
what
we
should
be
working
on
on
the
current
version
that
we
are
working
on
on
future
versions
and
to
share
experience
and
request
more
features
or
share
bugs
or
or
experience
on
the
on
the
app.
I
Right
now
on
on
the
link
that
we
always
share
it,
it's
unusable
because,
like
I
said
knowing
a
huge
refactor
and
I'm
testing
the
wrinkly,
but
as
soon
as
she
sit
he's
ready
to
start
playing
again
with
the
changes
on
the
contract
that
were
audited,
I'm
going
to
share
again
the
the
application
url
and
we
can
start
playing
testing
there
playing
there
and
start
thinking
about
the
deployment
on
arbitrary.
B
I
get
a
little
just
a
little
bit
exciting
every
time
you
say
deploy
on
arbitrom
both
because
it's
like
the
opportunity
for
swapper,
but
I
mean
it's
like
the
opportunity
for
swapper
l2s
in
general
on
ethereum
and
then
also
like
geek
style,
like
truly
morphing
into
a
multi-chain
like
governance
structure.
I
just
think
it's
yeah.
It's
an
exciting
thing
and
I
think
dick's
vote
is
kind
of
building
towards
that
and
that's
that's
really
exciting.
I
I
I
think
that
something
for
sure
will
go
wrong
at
the
at
the
first
month
on
the
on
there
with
the
network,
and
if
it's
going
to
be
the
first
layer
to
experience
connected
directly
with
mainnet,
so
yeah,
let's
see,
let's
see,
we
are
going
to
be
ready
there
and
we
are
going
to
we
are.
We
are
going
to
have
our
governance
there.
At
least
we
are
going
to
have
our
government's
platform.
We
are
going
to
be
able
to
use
it.
We
don't
necessarily
need
to
have
funds
or
have
a
lot
of
funds
so.
B
B
Which
is
like
kind
of
true
the
idea
of
being
like
this
is
a
huge,
like
you
know,
shift
in
in
lots
of
really
new
things
being
used,
and
so
yeah
it'll
be,
but
I
think
like
again,
this
is
why
we've
had
experience
and
like
the
xdi
experience,
I
think,
is
just
going
to
become
so
important
to
this
and
just
thinking,
I
think
we
first
deployed
xdxdow
in,
like
september
october,
took
a
little
while
to
get
up,
and
so
I
guess
for
arbitram
it
will
be.
B
I
I
I
I
mean
we
need
arbitrary
in
terms
of
governance,
because
we
are
going
to
have
a
product
there,
but
I
think
that
we
are
going
to
end
up
using
for
our
governance
structure
and
and
funding,
and
all
our
worker
proposals
and
everything
that
we
have
been
using.
B
Cool
and
just
as
good
said,
haven't
done
it
yet,
but
maybe
trying
to
set
up
a
bi-weekly
call
just
to
just
kind
of
be
able
to
gather
some
feedback
and
check
in
to
maybe
support
that.
So
if
you
have
any
interest
in
that
get
in
touch
and
be
on
the
lookout.
I
I
B
Sweet,
I
think
that
was
it.
The
only
other
thing
just
to
note
no
proposal
yet,
but
there's
a
good
discussion
about
what
type
of
farming
campaign
we
maybe
want
to
launch
with
swapper
beta
and
there's
some
polls
to
vote
on.
And
so
I
think
it
would
be
good,
maybe
for
us
to
find
signal
by
the
end
of
the
week,
so
that
we
can
start
to
move
that
towards
a
formal.