►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-03-31]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
march
31st,
I'm
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
a
bunch
of
proposals
in
the
queue
on
both
mainnet
and
xdi
on
mainnet
starting
first,
there
are
six
proposals
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
and
that
pending
the
pending,
boosting
number
may
include
ones
that
transactions
have
been
sent,
but
not
yet
confirmed,
but
the
the
three
proposals
on
mainnet
one
deposit,
300
eth
in
swapper
mainnet-
that
pass
passes-
I
think
in
36
hours.
And
so
this
will.
B
B
I
think
that'll
bring
it
to
like
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
treasury
liquidity
into
swapper
on
mainnet
and
then
there's
three
different
treasury
diversification
proposals
all
for
underneath
one
two
for
susd
one
for
usdt,
we'll
talk
about
treasury
in
a
little
bit
because,
like
there's,
been
some
good
conversations
there,
another
member
balancer
gen
reimbursement
to
transfer
from
mainnet
to
xdi,
and
then
there
is
the
halt,
the
dxd
bonding
curve
proposal.
B
So
this
was
submitted
last
week
by
augusto
I
had
looked
john
had
looked
at
it.
I
looked
at
it
kind
of
I
ran
some
tests,
kind
of
evaluate
everything
looks
good.
Obviously
this
is
a
huge
change
to
to
dxd,
and
so
it's
important
to
be
diligent
about
it.
I
just
was
an
update.
I
submitted
a
staking
proposal
about
two
hours
ago
and
I
think
gas
prices
moved
on
me
right
then,
and
I
even
sped
it
up,
and
now
I'm
still
looking
at
the
transaction,
and
so
it
should
boost.
B
I
think
when
gas
prices
come
down
in
like
the
next
hour
or
two,
and
then
that
will
presumably
pass
then
in
eight
days,
so
that
would
be
like
next
thursday
friday
and
this
would
be
yeah
pretty
significant
change
to
to
dxd.
It
would
kind
of
make
dxd
a
supply
capped
asset
right
now.
Of
course,
you
know.
B
Dxdow
is
ultimately
in
control
of
the
bonding
curve
contract
and
of
the
gt
token,
so
it
can
kind
of
do
it
whatever
it
wants,
but
governance
would
have
to
do
something
again
to
change
the
supply
structure
of
dxd
so
yeah.
I
think
that
could
be
a
a
pretty
big
change.
It's
something
that
will
probably
have
ripples
as
people
look
at
deex,
dow
and
now
like
okay.
Well,
now
it's
a
fixed
supply
cap
that
was
it
for
mainnet.
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
thoughts,
questions
comments
on
mainnet.
B
Cool
and
then
looking
to
ex
die
where
there
are
19
proposals
that
are
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
so
just
like
a
whole
bunch
of
governance
going
on
on
xdi.
So
there's
three
different
rep
boost
sinks
for
keenan
kanye
fork
or
myself
and
venky.
There
are
worker
proposals
for
keenan
and
violet
caden
and
federico.
B
There
is
a
payment
for
an
audit
for
the
gnosis
protocol,
relayer
and
swapper
farming
contracts
proposal
to
fill.
I
think
that
might
be
his
first
one.
That's
on
xdi,
then
there
are
a
series
of
proposals
related
to
funding
swapper.
So
as
a
reminder,
this
needs
to
be
there's
two
separate
proposals:
there's
one
to
fund
the
liquidity
relayer
to
put
the
assets
in
there
and
then
there's
a
second
proposal
to
take
the
assets
from
the
liquidity
layer
and
put
them
directly
in
into
swapper.
B
B
In
swapper
x,
die,
weth,
x,
die
pool,
and
I
think
it
is
larger
than
honey
swap,
but
maybe
smaller
than
bow
swap,
even
though
bounce
swap
doesn't
get
that
much
volume
there
and
then
there,
the
other
three
pairs
are
in
a
series
of
are
in
a
series
of
proposals
that
they
need
to
have
the
funding
proposal
to
send
them
funds
to
the
liquidity,
real
layer
and
then
to
get
them
put
them
directly
into
swapper.
B
And
then
I
want
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
more
in
a
second
but
then
just
the
last
other
proposal
is
there's
a
signal
proposal
should
deke
style
stake
with
the
eth
2.0
validator
through
stakewise.
This
is
submitted
by
nylon.
I
think
stakewise
was
on
the
biz.
Dev
call,
I
think,
last
monday,
so
yeah,
that's
kind
of
the
what's
on
x,
die
now
any
thoughts.
Questions
comments,
concerns
on
the
open
proposals
on
xtime.
B
I
should
say
there
was
a:
there
was
a
proposal
that
was
not
was
submitted
after
last
week's
call
that
also
passed
before
this
call,
which
is
a
pretty
cool,
pretty
cool
thing,
so
that
was
to
change
the
fee
on
the
house,
weft
pair
on
swapper
and
then
to
add
house
token
to
the
into
the
xdi
list.
So
house
is
a
token.
B
I
guess
it
did
a
sale
a
couple
weeks
ago,
because
it
just
kind
of
officially
launched
or
got
liquid
or
for
tradable
just
on
monday,
so
they
have
an
incentivized
pool
on
honey
swap
and
skye
had
been
talking
with
them
about
getting
some
liquidity
on
swapper,
and
particularly
they
were.
They
were
specific
to.
They
were
specific
to
wanting
the
higher
fees.
B
So
if
the
pool
on
swapper
has
a
three
percent
swap
fee-
and
I
think
there's
about
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
worth
of
house
with
liquidity,
but
I
think
more
than
anything,
it's
just
like
a
really
great
example
of
like
fast
acting
governance,
of
something
that
like
this
was
a
need
that
we
wanted
to
have
for
this
token
launch
very
quickly
and
the
only
way
to
get
that
proposal
passed
was
to
get
a
majority
of
rep.
So
we
did
that
twice
within
like
six
or
seven
hours.
B
So
it's
a
nice
accomplishment
and
shows
what
we
do
when
we
have
like
in
tune
governance
on
on
xda
sky.
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
to
that.
C
Yeah
not
on
that
one.
Specifically,
I
think
it's
cool
that
we
could
move
that
quickly.
I
did
have.
I
know
people
have
mentioned
so
the
dallas
alchemy
platform
is
is
kind
of
turning
into
what
it
was
meant.
What
is
built
for
where
there's
like,
let's
say,
there's
hundreds
of
proposals
like
there's
hundreds
of
regular
proposals
there
like
there's
tens,
okay,
but
hundreds
it's
actually.
C
So,
if
you're
not
going
to
boost
it
yourself
and
you
need
gen
to
boost
the
proposal-
and
you
know
everyone's
still-
some
people
are
still
learning
this
process.
But
if
you
just
create
a
proposal
and
leave
it
there
sitting
as
a
regular
proposal,
it
could
literally
just
sit
there
for
like
45
days
and
then
disappear
right.
It
has
to
be
boosted,
but
in
order
for
people
someone
to
boost
it,
people
have
to
know
that
it's
a
real
proposal
that
should
be
boosted
and
you
can
ask
people
to
boost
it.
A
I've
got
a
two
quick
thoughts
about
that.
Chris
says
the
government's
proposals
channel
discord,
which
is
a
really
good
idea
and
another
thing
directly
related
to
worker
proposals,
is
we
should
be
putting
when
our
proposal
is
live
on
our
draft.
I
think
I
I
think
we
used
to
do
that
and
I'm
not
seeing
it
a
lot
recently
and
I'm
not
doing
it.
But
if
you
put
up
a
draft
proposal
and
the
proposal
goes
live,
you
should
be
saying:
hey
it's
live
here.
B
B
So
we
we've
kind
of
avoided
this
problem
on
maine
at
the
last
couple
months,
and
so
I
would
say
it's
like
if
you
not
just
about
people
who
submit
a
proposal,
but
if
you
want
a
proposal
to
pass
like
you
kind
of
have
to
like
tell
someone
right,
and
so
you
there's
a
couple
different
ways
to
do
that,
like
one,
you
could
buy,
jen
and
stake
it
yourself
and
be
like.
B
I
think
this
is
a
really
important
proposal
or
you
could
tell
people
lobby,
people
that
are
involved
in
governance
right
and
I
think
people
that
are
voting
often
are
staking
often
like.
These
are
people
involved
in
governance.
You
can
like
ask
them
or
like
tell
them
that
this
is
about.
You
know
this
important
proposal
and
we
want
to
like
boost
it
or
or
or
promote
it.
So,
like
I
have
jen
on
next.
B
I
have
jen
on
on
on
mainnet,
like
I
looked
through
a
lot
of
different
proposals,
I'm
starting
to
look
through
like
technical,
more
like
technical
proposals
in
terms
of
that.
So,
if,
like
anyone,
has
any
proposal
that
they're
like
I
submitted
this
proposal
and
of
course-
and
I
want
to
get
it
passed,
you
know
reach
out
kind
of
lobby
someone
to
kind
of
to
get
make
that
happen.
B
And
that's
actually
drawing
there's
a
main
net
there's
a
one
or
two
proposal:
maintenance
too,
that
I
wasn't
even
sure
about,
but
and
then
related
to
that.
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
holographic
consensus
and
staking
and
john
had
some
posts
in
the
in
the
governance
disc
in
the
governance
channel
on
key
base
this
morning
about
kind
of
the
the
dynamics
with
with
with
boosting
proposals.
So
since
we
have
so
many
proposals
now
that
are
like
going
through
x
die
that
changes
the
the
amount
you
of
gen.
B
You
need
to
stay
boosted.
Dynamically
changes
based
upon
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
which
can
be
tricky
because
you're
when
you're
boosting
a
proposal
you're
looking
at
the
number
of
boosted
proposals,
then,
but
the
proposal
is
boosted
or
not
dependent
on
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
throughout
like
after
even
after
you
make
that
initial
initial
bet.
B
So
we
have
had.
We
had
a
little
bit
of
trouble
with
that
on
some
of
the
exti
proposals
as
they
relate
to,
as
it
relates
to
swapper
liquidity
because
remember
with
swapper
liquidity.
We
have
like
the
two
proposals.
We
have
the
liquidity,
deposit,
liquidity
relay
or
deposit
proposal
and
then
the
second
one,
and
they
need
to
go
in
that
order
right.
B
You
can't
you
can't
deposit
liquidity
and
swapper
if
it's
not
in
the
liquidity
relay,
so
one
of
the
liquidity
relay
or
funding
deposits
was
submitted
with
enough
gen
to
be
boosted
initially.
But
then,
after,
like
12
hours
or
16
hours,
there
were
other
proposals
that
got
boosted,
which
meant
that
it
no
longer
met
the
threshold
for
the
amount
of
gen
needed
to
be
boosted.
B
So
I
think
john
re-upped
a
bunch
of
these
proposals
now,
but
that
reset
the
clock
on
some
of
these
boosted
proposals,
and
I
wanted
to
talk
specifically
about
the
west
funding
proposal,
because
the
web
funding
proposal
is
now
delayed,
and
that
means
we
need
to
basically
delay
the
deposit,
the
lp
deposit
proposal
in
the
multi-call
scheme,
one
because
that
needs
to
happen
in
conjunction.
So
I
think
what
you
know.
This
is
kind
of
coordinating
governance.
B
We
can
kind
of
talk
about
how
this
this
plays
out,
but
what
I
was
hoping
to
do
was
to
basically
wait
to
vote
on
any
of
the
multi-call
scheme.
Proposals
that
use
the
wef
from
the
delayed
proposal
wait
until
it
is
under
over
under
two
days
to
vote
on
it
so
that
when
someone
votes
positively
on
it,
then
we
kick
off
the
new
overtime
and
that,
like
pushes
the
potential
date
that
the
proposal
will
be
executed
to
after
the
west
proposal.
B
What
proposal
which
was
delayed
goes
through,
and
so
remember
when
in
in
on
dalsack,
I
guess
it's
holographic
consensus,
but
when
the
end
result
of
a
vote
changes
then
it
goes
goes
either
from
negative
to
positive
right.
It
goes
against
to
four
or
four
to
against,
or
even
goes
from,
zero
percent.
No
one
voted
on
to
positive
saying
this
will
pass
that
it
kicks
off
a
48-hour
clock
that
it
has
that
the
proposal
has
to
stay
in
that,
like
passing
state
for
that
entire
48
hours.
B
So
if
we
don't
vote
on
it
these
these
proposals
for
the
next
couple
days,
then
we
can,
when
we
vote
on
it,
that
clock
will
be
extended
to
after
the
west
deposit
proposal
went
through.
I
know
it's
kind
of
confusing
and
I'm
kind
of
trying
to
coordinate
this,
but
questions
or
like
comments
about
that.
Let
me
paste
a
specific
proposal
in
here
that
I'd
be
like
don't
vote
on
until
it
matches
up.
C
A
cool
feature
in
alchemy
would
be
if
you
could
like
put
like
notes
on
these
things
and,
like
you
know,
who
writes
those
notes.
So
you
were
able
to
like
put
a
warning
or
put
a
flag
or
put
a
comment.
E
Yeah
I
can
share
my
screen
real,
quick
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
that
boosting
yeah
threshold
works
here
just
so
like
people
can
kind
of
like
so
okay.
So
if
I'm
on
the
xd
account,
people
can
see
my
screen
right.
So
if
you
go.
A
E
E
So
like
question
that
you
need
to
ask
yourself
when
you're
boosting
is
like
how
much
gen
is
going
to
be
needed
to
get
it
into
the
boosted
state
right,
and
so
the
protocol
is
calculating
how
much
gen
is
needed,
based
on
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
when
the
thing
actually
boosts
so
like
these
are
pending,
boosting
this
one's
set
to
boost
in
six
hours
right.
So
the
threshold
that
will
like
matter
is
like
what
is
what
will
depend
on
how
many
are
boosted
in
six
hours
right
so
like?
E
How
do
we
figure
that
out?
So
if
we
go
to
information
tab,
you
see
like
some
important
parameters.
There's
a
threshold
constant
down
here.
It's
1.2,
that's
like
a
number
that
gets
used
in
the
equation
and
then
there's
this
min
dao
bounty.
That's
like
how
much
the
dao
is
automatically
down
staking
a
proposal
and
then
the
equation
that
you
have
to
do
is
1.2
raised
to
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
and
that's
the
ratios.
Then
you
multiply
that
by
200
or
whatever.
The
current
down
stake
is
right.
E
A
E
Went
through
and
make
sure
like
all
of
these
are
good,
but
here
it
gets
a
little
tricky
because,
like
you
can
see
like
these
three
proposals
at
the
top
are
about
to
pass
in
about
11
hours,
so
the
number
of
boosted
ones
will
change
when
those
pass
right.
So,
like
they're
gonna,
pass
ahead
of
this
one.
So
that's
gonna
subtract
three
from
it.
You
get
five,
but
then
this
one
will
probably
boost.
So
then
you
get
six.
E
So
this
one
actually
only
needs
1.2
raised
to
the
six,
which
is
almost
three
times
200,
so
just
under
600.
So
this
one's
like
good
too
right.
So
it's
a
little.
E
The
math
and
you
basically
have
to
ask
yourself
like
what
is
the
boosted
count,
gonna
be
in
24
hours,
but
like
anybody
trying
to
figure
that
out
like
feel
free
to
like
just
penguin
governance,
channel
or
whatever,
and
we
can
like
talk
through
it.
If
there's
any
confusion,.
B
E
Like
this,
like
threshold
and
calculation,
is
done
within
each
scheme,
so
it's
a
little
different
like
there
might
be
a
different
down
stake
on
like
a
different
scheme
like
the
automatic
downstate
from
the
dow
might
not
be
200
in
a
different
scheme.
I
think
the
threshold
constants
tend
to
be
1.2
across
the
board,
but
they
could
be
different
as
well.
You
should.
E
Changes
but
the
automatic
is
yeah
you
can
think
of
it
as
a
general
award,
but
it's
like
the
bounty
yeah,
the
it's.
The
debt
like
how
much
the
dow
is
automatically
down
staking
on
any
new
proposal
and
that's
sort
of
an
incentive,
an
automatic
incentive
for
people
like
so
200
gen.
E
I
don't
know,
maybe
it's
worth
like
40
50
and
current
prices
and
like
if
you're,
the
only
up
staker
on
a
proposal
that
passes
and
you
get
that
200
gen,
which
is
something
maybe
we
should
also
talk
about,
is
like
once
you
get
up
to
you
know,
there's
like
15
16
proposals
like
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
at
that
point.
It
takes
3000
gen
to
boost
something.
So
it.
E
E
You
know
if
that
number
doubles.
It's
it's
an
exponential
too.
So
it
gets
like.
Let
me
just
type
in
some
numbers
like
if
it's
20
now
you're
talking
7600
gen,
so
we're
not
that
far
from
like
the
cost
to
boost
the
proposal
being
like
thousands
of
dollars,
which
is,
I
don't
know,
if
that's
really
where
we
want
to
be,
I
think
we
can
actually
vote
to
configure
the
scheme
and
lower
the
automatic
down
stake,
because
the
other
side
of
that
too
is
spending
gen
right.
D
You
can
also
lower
the
threshold
like
that,
like
the
yeah,
so
from
1.2,
you
can
put
it
as
one
so
like
like
everything
can
be
basically
reduced,
and
I
don't
know
while
we're
at
it
and
gusto
is
on
the
skull.
So
he's
going
to
be
happy
like
we
should
look
into
using
dxd.
For
that.
H
Yeah
we
have
a
lot
of
dxe
and
yeah.
We
have
a
dxe
boarding
machine
that
I'm
testing
on
dx
boat
and
on
cable
and
we
have
been
using
it
yeah.
The
only
change
that
I
did
was
allowing
on
the
body
machine
that
we
are
using.
I
don't
want
to
use
other
erc20
token
yeah,
so
a
very
simple
change
that
can
be
possible
in
the
future.
H
Every
scheme
uses
special
machine
right
now
we
are
using
the
genesis
protocol
body
machine
that
uses
gen
but
yeah
that
can
be
changed
and
about
the
the
threshold
yeah.
We
were
talking
about
about
it
on
on
an
outer
topic,
where
nico
proposes
a
new
vertical
installation.
H
Maybe
we
can
talk
about
it
later,
and
I
just
mentioned
that
yeah
we
can
change
the
threshold
if
we
are
going.
If
we
are
going
to
have
a
lot
of
proportions
on
it
on
a
scheme
and
scheme
is
going
to
be
very
popular,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
use
a
lower
threshold.
B
The
number
of
boosted
proposals
so
yeah
I
mean,
I
think
it
makes.
I
guess
I
don't
like
having
that
just
be
one,
because
I
do
like
the
idea
of
like
needing
to
like
you
want
to
have
some
constraint,
but
yeah
it
does
make
it.
You
can
see
how
it
grows
exponentially
there
too
and
yeah,
I'm
all
in
favor
of
figuring
out
how
to
use
dxd.
For
this.
E
If
we
change
it
to
1.1
for
the
funding
and
voting,
it
would
30
boosted.
Proposals
would
then
correspond
to
about
3
500
gen
to
boost
with
a
200
down
stake,
so
we
could
also
like
if
we
change
the
downstream
that's
the
other
other.
We
can
change
it.
D
Yeah,
so,
by
the
way,
the
goal
behind
this
is
that
you
know
to
increase
the
cost
for
someone
to
basically
ddos
the
dow,
which
is
important
because
in
theory
like
this
is
like
this
could
happen.
E
I
also
think
the
auto
down
stake
creates
an
incentive
for
like
people
to
pay
attention
as
well
right
because
you're
actually
earning
a
reward
when
you're
right,
yeah.
G
G
B
B
So
yeah
because
it's
like
I
maybe
I'm
in
favor-
I
guess
if
nylon
said,
like
the
ddos
protection
and
that's
more
of
like
the
exponential,
like
growth
of
it,
and
making
sure
that
that's
intact,
as
opposed
to
like
the
base
yeah.
Maybe
if
we
look,
we
could
lower
it
to
like
100
150
and
then
keep
the
1.2
there.
H
Yeah
yeah,
even
using
a
value
like
1.05,
something
like
that
where
it's
going
to
grow
exponentially,
it's
going
to
protect
you,
it's
going
to
protect
you
against
ddos,
which
again
in
an
attack
on
a
mainnet,
a
ddos
attack
or
blocked
on
blockchain
or
maintenance.
Like
it
it's
something
that
sounds
so
real
right,
but
this
can
happen
because
we
use
holographic
concessions
and
if
you
create
a
proposal
now
one
vote
on
it,
it
will
be
triggered.
It
will
be
executed
like
it
will
be
accepted
or.
A
H
A
small
body
can
go
there
and
create
a
sheet
of
proportions
and
we
are
going
to
hold.
We
are
going
to
have
to
go
through
each
of
them.
Even
if
I
take
one
rep
on
each
proportion,
I
can
make
sure
that
I'm
going
to
create
enough
proportions
to
cause
so
much
pain
in
the
ass
for
the
for
the
exile
holders
that
are
going
to
go
and
have
to
dumpster
all
of
them
so
yeah.
H
What
we
need
to
do
is
to
deploy
a
dxz,
boring
machine
and
assign
use
that
body
machine
in
the
new
schemes
like
we
will
have
to
deploy,
for
example,
on
the
new
multi-core
skin
that
we
are
planning
to
deploy.
Maybe
we
can
use
a
dxe
boring
machine
for
a
special
scheme.
G
Yeah,
I
think,
like
anyone,
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
we
need
to
basically
work
on
this
dow
stack
subgraph
to
get
our
own
voting
machine
in.
H
G
Yes,
I
think
that
means
like
we're,
basically
depending
on
dx
volts,
to
be
there
to
have
like
dxt
staking
token.
H
The
super
chip,
and
then
you
can
use
it
for
for
a
staking,
so
it
is
actually
how
it's
working
on
wrinkle
and
it's
working
fine,
and
just
as
you
work
with
gem,
you
use
dxe,
wrinkle
and
yeah.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
use
if
we
figure
out
an
xd
bridge
for
dxz
on
xi.
We
can
use
dxe
for
staking
on
its
side.
H
Hundred
percent-
yes,
that
was
avoidable-
to
use
the
xds
as
body
machine
token.
I
I
think,
will
be
a
huge
success
because
it
will
get.
It
will
give
dxe
our
first
real
use
case
like
okay.
What
do
you
use
the
exist
for
right
now?
You
use
it
for
anything,
because
there
is
no
dft
kill
like
you.
Just
have
a
stake
on
our
organization,
but
here
it
will
create
some
appreciation
because
you
are
going
to
need
dxe
to
support
proposals.
B
Cool,
it's
always
interesting
when
we
just
to
learn
about
the
system,
just
because
we're
running
on
and
answering
questions
on
like
how
to
how
to
get
things
done.
So
it's
good
to
know
yeah
how
everything
works.
I
want
to
get
to
the
new
multi-call
installation
in
a
second
that
that
agusto
mentioned
but
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
move
to
hr
check-in
so
melanie,
who
I
think
is
on
the
call
has
been
she
her
worker
proposal.
B
Trial
draft
was,
I
think,
spent
the
end
of
last
week,
beginning
this
week,
she's
been
on
a
couple
calls,
I
think,
talked
to
a
couple:
different
people
and
yeah
we're
trying
to
work
on
some
improvements
to
the
worker
proposal
process,
helping
people
along
and
tracking
things
better.
Some
milling-
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
kind
of
give
a
brief
update
on
on
what
you've,
what
you've
been
up
to.
F
Yeah
definitely
guys,
and
then
for
those
of
you
who
don't
know
me,
I'm
melanie,
like
chris
stated,
I
did
submit
my
worker
proposal
on
dow
talk
on
monday,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
go
check
it
out
if
you
haven't,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
kind
of
an
update
on
what
we've
been
doing
in
hr
or
you
know
the
contributor
experience
we're
kind
of
thinking
of
a
new
name
for
it,
but
for
the
past
week,
ali
my
counterpart
and
I
have
been
working
on
tracking
for
current
and
past
worker
proposal.
F
F
We
are
working
on
an
alert
system
of
how
we
plan
to
contact
each
of
you
and
let
you
know
when
your
next
proposals
are
due
for
now
it
will
be
a
pretty
manual
process
we
put
in
place
until
we
figure
out
a
more
permanent
and
scalable
solution
to
notifying
everyone
from
the
data
we've
captured.
So
far,
a
lot
of
you
guys
are
late
on
your
next
worker
proposal
submission,
but
we're
working
on
that
and
getting
that
all
figured
out.
We've.
F
I've
also
started
on
standardizing
our
onboarding,
I'm
going
to
be
setting
up
meetings
like
chris
stated,
if
I
haven't
already
with
all
of
you
to
get
your
input
on
where
we
can
improve
on
the
onboarding
process.
I
know
at
the
moment
there
isn't
a
consistent
process
that
is,
is
being
used
to
bring
on
each
new
contributor.
F
For
example,
everyone
introduces
themselves
in
the
introductions
on
keyways
and
attends
meetings
and
then
has
a
copy
of
our
contributor
guidelines,
but
really
once
it's
past
that
point,
it
seems
as
if
there's
no
set
process
for
incoming
contributors,
while
this
weeds
out
the
not
as
strong
candidates.
I
think
I
think
it's
a
little
unfair.
I
think
we
need
a
consistent
orientation
to
make
each
new
contributor
feel
more
comfortable
and
it'll
really
help
them
adapt
to
our
ecosystem
and
it'll
really
promote
communication
and
confidence
with
the
excel.
F
So
I'm
definitely
going
to
be
leaning
on
on
you
guys
over.
You
know
the
next
few
weeks
or
so
just
to
get
some
more
information
about.
You
know
what
what
changes
you
guys
think
need
to
be
made
to
just
the
overall
onboarding
process
and
and
bringing
new
contributors
in.
Definitely
I
want.
I
want
to
be
able
to
lend
my
experience
and
expertise
to
you
all
just
to
make
everything
a
little
bit
easier
and
just
to
kind
of
avoid
any
confusion
for
new
contributors
coming
on,
but
yeah.
B
Thanks
adam,
I
think
that
is
a
good
idea.
Maybe
we
need
some
was
it
gpt,
3
or
the
ai
to
write
the
write,
the
proposals
for
everyone,
but
yeah?
I
think
you
know
it's
really
exciting.
So,
in
addition
to
mel
melanie
so
ali,
who
I
think
kenan
introduced
has
also
been
helping
a
little
bit
part-time
on
this
and
so
she's
helping
with
some
of
the
data
entry
there
and
yeah.
B
I
think
this
is
like
a
really
like
it's
kind
of
just
about
like
building
more
communication
channels,
because,
like
all
of
this
is
like
how
do
we
communicate
in
across
different
people
in
in
the
org,
where
it's
not
hierarchical,
where
it's
not
kind
of
coming
elsewhere,
and
so
yeah?
I'm
hoping
that
that
that
we
can
yeah
gather
some
feedback
on
this
and
and
surface
some
things
that
we
can
work
on.
H
Yes,
sorry,
I
just
also
wanted
to
say
that
the
idea
here
is
also
to
have
someone
that
will
be
responsible
for
keeping
track
of
how
many
workers
are
we
having
in
the
organization
right
now
and
who
is
working
on
what,
how
much
is
getting
paid
and
how
much
money
is
owned,
and
I
think
something
very
important
that
we
haven't
that.
We
talk
a
lot
last
month
regarding
that
the
topic
was
brought
regarding
my
work
proposal,
where
we
analyze-
and
we
talk
about
my
my
my
derivatives.
A
H
If
I
deliver
what
I
why
I
what
I
say
that
I
was
going
to
deliver
on
my
proposal
or
not
so
it
was
a
huge
discussion
about
that,
and
I
think
it
would
be
awesome
if
we
can
also
start
keeping
track
of
our
deliveries
and
start
measuring
how
our
work
is
in
our
dxo
internally.
H
H
But
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
find
a
way
where
it's
not
going
to
consume
our
time
of
our
workers,
but
we
can.
We
can
find
time
about
how
value
is
being
each
worker
for
the
exile,
because
there
is
a
lot
of
people
we
need
to
define
hub.
It
would
be
great
to
have
some
sense
of
value.
How
much
everyone
is
giving
back
to
the
exile.
G
Yeah,
did
you
guys
see
a
product
from
yearn
collaborate,
nope.
G
Oh
okay
and
that's
actually
like.
I
think
we
should
like
look
into
what
what
they're
doing,
even
if
like
they
just
use
github,
which
we
also
use
like.
Maybe
that's
totally
fine.
But
maybe
it
is
useful
for
us
because
it's
like
showcase
how
there's
like
how
those
developers
are
actually
working
together
through
github.
H
There
are
a
lot
of
tools
on
github
that
we
can
use
to
track.
Project
development
like
a
lot
of
stuff.
Github
has
improved
a
lot
on
the
on
the
project-
development,
at
least
tracking
of
of
us.
What
is
happening
like
you,
you
now
have
you
can
create
issues
and
that's
for
everything.
So
I
think
it's
very.
It
will
be
very
helpful
for
us
to
start
using
github,
more
often
leon.
I'm
sure
you
know
what
we
are
working
on
our
code
reviews,
even
even
for
not
even
for
non-technical
people
to
get
involved.
H
That
is
something
that
I'm
going
to
try
to
position
on
the
expo:
to
get
common
users,
for
example
like
like,
like
chris
dummy
sky,
who
are
not
developers
to
get
the
github
account
and
review
the
work
that
is
going
to
be
done
on
dx
ball
and
they
are
going
to
say
hey
what
is
happening
here,
because
we
we
need
final
user
to
review
our
tasks,
not
just
in
our
developer.
Another
developer
is
fine,
but
it
would
be
great
if
we
gonna
start
using
it
as
a
community.
B
For
the
record,
I
do
have
a
github
account
so,
but
I
know
I
think
it's
a
good
idea-
and
I
know
melanie
can
maybe
answer
this
better,
but
I
kind
of
see
us
as
like,
basically
like
first,
we
need
to
like
figure
out.
What's
happened
right,
we
need
to
like
track
everything,
that's
kind
of
going
on
the
last
several
months,
because
we've
put
it
on.
We
put
it
down
in
proposals
right
in
the
forums
we
kind
of
know
it's
there.
B
We
don't
have
a
way
of
kind
of
seeing
everything,
that's
kind
of
like
understanding
like
what
we've
done
and
then
figuring
out
like
a
system
for
incorporating
new
proposals,
kind
of
additional
ones,
and
then
it's
kind
of
I
think
I
think
what
you're
talking
about
in
terms
of
tracking
and
performance
is
in
that,
like
new
system
that
we
we
do
so
I'm
hoping
that
we
kind
of
move
move
to
next,
as
we
get
a
understanding
of
like
our
retrospective
activity
over
the
last
few
months.
F
Yeah,
definitely
I
mean
right
now
we're
really
kind
of
we're
going
through
all
of
like
the
current
and
past
proposals
and
just
like
identifying
areas
that,
like
need
to
be
improved,
you
mentioned
deliverables.
I
think
that
that
needs
to
be
on
everybody's
proposal,
so
we
can
easily
track.
You
know
what
deliverables
have
been
completed
and
which
ones
haven't
definitely
a
lot
of
kind
of
missing
pieces,
but
I
can
you
know
I
really
want
to
be
able
to
lend
a
hand.
You
know
people
have
questions,
you
know
adam.
F
Of
course
you
can
hire
me
to
help
help
with
your
proposal.
I
want
to
walk
you
through
it.
I
want
it
to
be
like
an
easy
task,
something
that's
not
daunting.
You
know.
This
is
something
that
you
have
to
submit
every
two
months,
whether
we
all
really
like
it
or
not.
So
let's
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
easier.
G
Yeah
like
I
would
also
argue
that
the
working
groups
themselves
can
judge
about
p,
like
people
contribute
inside
those
working
groups
if
they
actually
delivered
what
they
promised.
So
I
think
that
is
already
like
a
bottom-up
approach,
which
works
pretty
fine.
Like
I
know
my
my,
like
my
own
team
is
doing
a
lot
of
hard
work.
B
Cool,
I'm
so
excited
to
see
that
go
forward,
and
hopefully
everyone
will
benefit
and
gain
some
ease
of
or
yeah
kind
of,
make
everyone's
lives
a
little
bit
easier,
so
cool
and
then
yeah
next
wanted
to
talk
about
a
new
multi-call
scheme,
installation,
so
nico
has
a
post
out
about
installing
a
new
multi-call
scheme
that
would
change
a
couple,
different
things
and
kind
of
split
it
up
into
three
different
components
and
three
different
types
or
tracks.
B
I
guess
of
proposals
augusto
had
some
good
follow-up
questions
there
and
that
the
threat
is
is
on
dow
talk
so
nico.
Do
you
want
to
kind
of
give
the
background
on
that
and
and
what
we
should
be
looking
at.
I
Yeah
definitely
like
I'm,
sharing
my
screen
in
a
sec
about
what
we
are
actually
proposing,
but,
firstly,
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
get
some
background
about
it.
What
we've
been
using
the
multi-color
in
the
past,
so
basically
multicalled
has
been
installed.
I
think
it
was
late
december
that
we
installed
it
so
beginning
from
this
year
on.
We
used
it
to
actually
be
able
to
interact
with
external
contracts
that
we
have
been
using
dedicated
plugins
before
so
that
basically
meant
before
we
had
the
multicall.
I
That
was
the
idea
and
back
in
the
days
we
we
decided
to
keep
it
relatively
easy
to
also
like
to
to
enable
us
to
to
monitor
the
proposals
relatively
easy
because
of
security
concerns,
etc.
I
And
while
that
was
probably
like
a
first
good
step,
it
now
makes
sense
to
work
on
a
new
structure
that
gives
us
a
bit
more.
Flexibility
and
augusto
has
also
been
sharing
that
idea
later
last
year,
and
I
think
it's
a
good
time
to
to
get
that
started
and
help
us
get
a
bit
more
flexibility
here,
yeah.
So
as
mentioned,
we
would
not
use
one
multi-core
in
the
future,
but
basically
install
three
different
kind
of
multi
calls.
I
One
of
them
is
what
we
call
a
quick
multi
call,
so
that
would
basically
allow
us
to
grade
and
execute
proposals
within
three
days.
So
we
will
probably
want
to
use
that
for
product
specific
proposals,
for
example,
updating
a
release,
updating
an
uns
domain
or,
for
example,
updating
repositories
on
on
reticle.
Something
like
that.
That
is
not
really
critical
from
the
governance
perspective.
I
Then
we
would
have
a
safe
multi
call,
which
is
basically
the
one
that
we
are
currently
using.
So
within
eight
days
we
would
be
able
to
kind
of
approve
and
find
concepts
about
geek
style,
overall
governance
proposals,
and
then
the
third
one
is
a
opening
call,
and
the
big
difference
here
is
why
quick
and
safe
multi
calls
would
still
use
a
white
list
that
need
to
be
defined
when
we
installed
the
multi
call.
The
open,
multi
call
would
be
able
to
speak
with
any
kind
of
protocol
that
we
want
to.
I
I
That's
the
that's
the
basic
idea,
so
we
have
what
like.
If
we
need
something
that
needs
to
be
executed
fast,
we
could
add
it
on
the
white
list
of
this
quick
multi
call,
and
if
there
is
something
new
that
we
haven't
thought
about,
we
could
still
use
this
open
vertical.
Even
though
it's
a
bit
low
yeah.
I
That's
the
structure
and
then
some
just
some
some
notes
there
still
some
limitations
that
we
currently
have,
and
that
needs
to
be
researched
on
is
that
we
actually
are
currently
not
able
to
transfer
any
kind
of
eth
or
any
ec20
tokens
transferred
or
either
approve
it.
So
that
is
currently
something
that
is
really
exclusively
limited
to
this
funding
proposal
plug-in
so
ever
so.
I
Whenever,
like
we
want
to
speak
to
another
protocol
and
send
funds
or
prove
something
on
another
protocol,
we
would
still
have
to
use
that
it's
less
like
a
technical
complexity,
more
like
a
security
concern,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
external
treasury
is
not
at
risk.
So
that's
something
we
currently
do
not
support.
B
Niko,
just
that's
that's
like
with
the
swapper
liquidity.
That's
why
there's
like
two
different
proposals
right
there's
like
a
funding
proposal
that
is
sending
the
funds
and
so
you're,
proposing?
Basically
the
same
thing
here,
where
any
multi-call
proposal
that
would
require
funds
would
presumably
need
a
second
corresponding
funding
proposal.
I
Exactly
yep
that
that's
like
the
current
structure
that
we
would,
as
we
would
propose
it
here,
but
I'm
also
aware
that
this
is
like
a
bigger
restriction
and
we
should
focus
on
on
building
up
a
possible
solution
or
researching
at
least
how
that
could
could
work
in
the
in
the
next
releases
or
generation
of
emoticon
cool
yeah.
So
that's
like
the
dot
post.
There
are
some
technical
parameters
that
we
are
trying
to
find
concerns
about.
I
I
would
be
happy
if
we
maybe
could,
today
or
tomorrow,
at
latest,
get
all
of
the
feedback
from
the
community
about
that
governance,
parameters
and
then
move
forward
and
go
and
install
it
on
alchemy
and
make
sure
we
get
those
plugins
installed
soon.
B
And
you,
you
do
have
a
poll
in
the
I
think
reply
here
and
I
guess
I'm
just
looking
at
that
and
I
feel
like
we
actually
kind
of
discussed
that
a
little
bit
and
that's
earlier
and
that's
asking
about
the
threshold
constant
for
the
multi-goal
scheme.
So
this
would
be
what
like
increases.
What
we
were
talking
about
earlier
about
increases
the
amount
of
gen
that's
needed
to
steak.
D
Yeah,
so
I
I'm
just
like,
maybe
my
wonderings
is
around
the
open,
multi
call
and
do
we
feel
safe
with
14
days,
because
theoretically,
if
any
proposal
passes
there,
you
could,
with
one
proposal
or
like
with
one
pass,
could
essentially
steal
all
the
all
the
funds,
all
the
treasury
and
everything.
So.
I
D
I
H
Yeah
I
mean
we
feel
safe.
If
you
can
do
this,
you
can
steal
everything
with
the
contribution
reward
right
now.
If
you
want
also
sure
yeah,
I
mean
it's
exactly
the
same.
We
have
been
using
and
we
had
this
option
for
ever
and
ever
you
were
always.
You
were
told
if
you
can't
find
a
way
around
our
corners
to
steal
everything.
It
was.
D
H
E
Yeah,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
the
fun
transfers
limited
to
a
single
scheme,
which
is
the
contribution
reward
scheme
just
so
that,
because
I
think
this
is
the
safety
is
really
about
voter
attention
right,
like
it's
all,
about
people,
understanding
what
is
happening
and
because,
as
long
as
voters
are
paying
attention,
we
should
be
in
good
shape,
and
so
that's
why
I
think
having
it
in
one
scheme
makes
sense
and
yeah.
I
don't
think
14
days
is
like
something
to
feel
scared
like
I
don't
I'm
not
too
worried
about
that
either.
E
Like
you
agree
with
the
gusto
there
like
it's
longer
than
the
funding
one,
it's
also
about
the
same
as
adding
a
new
plug-in,
so
it
sort
of
already
exists
to
some
degree
yeah.
I
guess
that
would
be
a
two-step
process,
but
if
you
could
add
any
plug-in
in
like
15
days,
then
you
can
also
pretty
much
do
anything
right.
So.
D
Yes,
I'm
trying
to
kind
of
like
think
forward
with
like
the
stakewise
proposal.
D
Theoretically,
we
like
it
isn't
like
what
you
you
want
to
register
is
an
open
multi-call,
but
because
you
cannot
transfer
funds
like
we
still
wouldn't
be
able
to
use
that.
For
let's
say
we
wanted
to
stake
in
statewide.
I
Yeah
that
that's
definitely
like
the
one
missing
piece
that
is
currently
not
possible,
so
whenever
we
actually
want
to
transfer
funds,
we
need
some
kind
of
like
intermediary
contract,
but
I
mean
still
that
that
could
be
like
a
like
a
next
iteration
of
the
multi-core
we
could
research
on
and
like.
I
I
think
there
are
some
possible
ideas
there
as
well,
but
yeah
still,
we
we
wouldn't
really
be
able
to
stake
or
provide
liquidity
or
whatever
we
want
to
do
in
the
default
space
without
currently
the
need
of
writing
intermediary
smart
contracts,
which
is
for
the
long-term
vision.
What
we
want
to
achieve
through
governance-
probably
not
not
the
best
situation,
but
it
could
be
just
an
iteration
we're
working
on.
H
E
Just
a
call
to
action
if,
if
there
is
anything
on
that
list
or
anything
missing
from
that
list,
that
you'd
like
or
think
we
should
be
interacting
with
like
now
is
the
time
to
suggest
it
before
we
get
to.
You
know,
proposals
and
stuff
that
cost
money
and
take
time
to
install
so
yeah.
If
there's
anything
that
you
think
is
missing,
and
it
goes
for
anybody
here,
just
like
say.
B
B
That
cool
all
right
so
check
out
the
teletalk
thread,
anything
that
we
may
be
missing
and
yeah
all
right.
Moving
on
just
to
brief
update
on
on
gas
stuff,
I'm
gonna
talk
with
dave
a
bit,
and
so
today
is
the
last
of
the
month
and
the
last
of
the
quarter.
B
So
at
the
end
of
the
month,
we're
going
to
calculate
the
last
three
months
of
gas
cost
and
then
deploy
a
contract
and
fund
that
and
we're
going
to
do
that
on
mainnet,
because
that's
where
people
will
be
funding
and
that's
where
people
are
paying
the
cost
for
that,
and
I
think
we'll
probably
get
into
the
habit
of
doing
this
every
three
months
I
think
just
to
maybe
save
on
on
gas
costs,
but
once
we
do
it
this
time,
I
think
we
can
yeah.
We
can.
B
We
could
talk
about
next
time
there
and
then
on
the
multi-sig
gas
costs.
Dave,
I
think,
is
also
going
to
provide
gonna
recalculate
it
at
the
end
of
the
month
now
and
so
we'll
have
those
like
gas
cost
there
and
we'll
be
able
to
reimburse
those
through
through
that.
B
And
dave's
also
been
working,
pretty
sweet
on
some
like
treasury
stuff,
doing
a
lot
of
pulling
a
lot
of
cool
data
and
looking
up
the
dx
style
treasury
and
not
just
like
the
one
we're
talking
about
here,
but
also
like
xda,
and
we
have
the
buyback
reserve,
which
now
has
usd
usdc
in
it
and
yeah
so
next
thursday,
to
plug
a
little
bit
we'll
be
presenting
a
treasure
report
on
the
q1
activity
there
and
yeah.
Hopefully
that
will
spark
some
conversation
about
what
we're
kind
of
doing
with
the
treasury.
B
I
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
good
good,
good
discussion
lately,
whether
it's
the
staking
or
like
earning
additional
yield.
I
really
liked
what
skye
said
in
the
treasury
channel
this
morning,
just
of
kind
of
like
the
list
of
things
you
want
to
do
so.
This
guy
was
just
going
to.
I
was
going
to
share
my
screen
and
see
if
you
had,
you
wanted
to
kind
of
talk
through
that
quickly.
B
C
C
But
let's
say
let's
say
we
call
it
like
we'll
call
it
a
risk
ladder
from
now
on,
and
I
think
as
we
as
we
all
know,
it
started
from
like
the
early
beginnings
of
there
was
a
dow
and
there
was
there
was
no
money,
there
were
a
few
people
and
there
was
no
money
and
so
like.
How
do
you
climb
a
wrist
ladder
from
there?
C
Then
it
got
comfortable
with
holding
capital
right,
which
these
are
all
things
that,
like
most
dows
in
the
world,
have
never
done,
and
most
people
in
the
world
have
never
done.
So.
These
are
not
like
easy
things
right.
So
a
dow
has
to
be
able
to
hold
capital
and
then
adao
the
dow
started
using
that
capital
to
build
products
and
grow,
and
then
we
realized
you
know.
C
So
the
first
step
is
to
practice
smart
risk
management
and
that's
secure
some
runway
for
your
project
and
therefore
we
started
turning
some
capital
into
stable
dollar
capital
right,
just
basic,
stable
dollar
capital
alongside
that
that
secures
runway,
but
then
that
that's
also
the
the
product,
the
the
type
of
assets
that
we
can
use
in
the
products
that
we're
building
so
especially
swapper
and
also
omen
omen
markets.
We're
mainly
using
you
know,
part
of
our
risky
assets,
plus
the
dollar
stable
assets.
C
That
were
that
we
required,
and
so
we
start
to
use
the
the
capital
that
we
have
in
our
own
products,
which
we've
built,
which
which
do
a
few
things
it
actually
like,
earns
you
some
yield.
We
don't
know
how
much
yield,
but
there's
more
than
that
like
in
omen.
For
example,
like
I
don't
overall,
like
omen
squad,
I
don't
think
has
made
money,
but
it's
allowed
people
to
like
it's
we're
learning
a
lot
of
lessons.
C
People
can
use
omen
product,
it's
good
for
marketing,
so
you
can.
You
can
move
capital
around
that
way,
but
it's
really
like
uses
in
our
products
and
then
the
next
step
related
to
our
products
would
be
to
really
use
our
capital
for
yield
farming,
so
incentives-
and
that's
a
that's
that
that's
obviously
something
that
has
been
hugely
popular
in
the
last
year.
It's
it's
giving
out
capital
or
ownership
in
your
protocol
in
order
to
attract
users.
Now
is
that
sustainable
in
the
long
run?
C
C
And
then
the
next
thing
which
we
now
have
established
is
to
use
the
capital
that
we
have
to
invest
and
build
important
projects
outside
of
dxdow
that
we
think
would
be
beneficial
to
dx
dow,
and
so
that
is
the
establishment
of
dx
ventures.
We
haven't
made
an
investment
yet,
but
we're
like
getting
close,
maybe
on
a
couple,
but
that's
a
great
use
and
then
the
you
know
these
are
all
getting.
C
You
know
more
advanced
and
riskier
as
we
go
up
this
ladder
right
and
then
the
next
one
would
be
like
yield
like
holding
yield
earning
assets
instead
of
just
plain
like
either
risky
and
dollar
stable
assets,
and
so
the
simplest
basic
version
of
that
which
people
have
talked
about
is
something
like
compounded
ave
so
like.
If
we're
gonna
hold
two
million
dollars
in
dx
dial,
that's
just
gonna
sit
there
as
like
a
runway
that
maybe
not
even
for
payroll
but
just
kind
of
sits
there.
C
You
rather
hold
it
in
compound
or
ave
dye
than
just
normal
die,
because
then
you
at
least
you're
earning
some
interest,
but
at
the
same
time,
compound
and
aveir
are
pretty
safe.
Like
they've
been
around
for
a
long
time,
people
are
pretty
confident
you
mean.
Theoretically,
you
can
buy
insurance
on
them
too,
which
is
relatively
cheap
but
you're,
but
you
have
the
plan
to
hold
those
for
a
long
time
so
because
the
extent
doesn't
move
very
fast,
holding
those
assets.
Long
term
is
like.
C
If
you
hold
ave
earning
die,
you
you're,
not
you
don't
need
to
switch
between.
You
know
every
week
like
you
could
literally
hold
that
for
five
years,
and
you
know
that
you'll
be
fine
for
five
years
right.
So
that
would
be
like
the
next
step
and
then
then
you
can
take.
You
can
go
up
the
wrist
ladder
to
like
something
like
y
earn
and
you
can.
But
you
know
you
could
hold
y
earn
for
like
two
years
and
still
be
fine
right.
Once
you
put
an
allocation
there,
you
can
just
hold
it.
C
That's
fine
and
then
the
next
thing
would
be
like
taking
more
risk,
that's
more
dynamic
with
your
capital,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
checked
out
dhedge.
It's
actually
pretty
super
cool
enzyme.
I
think
which
nico
told
me
about
is
similar,
and
these
are
like
actual
traders
trying
to
add
alpha
with
whatever
capital
you
are
assigned
to
them.
C
But
but
I
think
this
is
the
future
of
of
hedge
funds,
where
the
actual
trader
doesn't
have
your
capital,
like
you
own
your
capital
and
now
the
risk,
the
the
trader,
the
person
you
give
your
capital
to
can't
take
your
money,
but
they
can
take
massive
risk
with
your
money
right
and
so
then.
The
question
is
how
much,
how
much
money
do
they
have
in
this
actual
fund?
C
And
if
they
have
say,
like
50
of
the
fund
and
they're
taking
risk
with
their
own
money,
then
you're.
You
should
be
more
confident
that
that
they're
gonna
be
safe,
like
you
know,
smarter,
with
their
with
that
risk.
They're
not
just
gonna
like
go
for
the
fences,
and
so
you
can
actually
allocate
a
portion
to
like
some
of
those
funds
and
that
will
that
should
give
you
like
an
uncorrelated
alpha.
C
In
addition,
as
like
a
percentage
of
your
portfolio,
which
would
be
super
cool,
like
that's
like
smart,
like
overall
portfolio
diversification-
and
you
can
hold
that
long
term
and
then
the
next
thing
is
kind
of
what
was
talked
on,
the
call
is
like
what
can
dx
doubts
do
to
like
act
like
a
hedge
fund
who,
at
dxdow
is
going
to
actually
do
that?
How
fast
can
dxdow
actually
move
in
and
out
of,
yield
farming
assets?
And
I'd
say
that
this
is
similar
to
what
like,
apparently
we've
heard.
C
C
Now,
that's
not
that's
very
hard
for
dx
dow
to
do
and
it's
you
have
to
trust
those
people,
probably
so
like
that's
way
down
the
line
after
we
do
all
this
other
stuff
before
you
start
doing
like
active
risk
taking
like
in
and
out
with
dx
fun,
dx
styles
funds,
and
then
the
last
step
is
the
initial
vision
of
dx
dao,
which
dow
stack
and
gnosis
had
laid
out
from
the
beginning.
Is
that
like
dx,
dow
theoretically,
could
become
the
largest
financial
organism
in
the
world?
B
I
do
like
the
jump
from
10
to
11,
though
just
11.,
it's
and
then
dig
style
is
the
largest
financial
organism
in
the
world,
yeah
yeah,
and
then
I
mean
the
things
I
like
about.
This
is
just
kind
of
the
idea
of
a
doing
a
lot
right
and
kind
of
building
up
the
risk,
tolerance
and
expanding
where
the
treasury's
going
martin's
making
some
good
points
in
there
about
putting
it
across
chains
and
different
bases,
which
I
think
we're
on
our
way
to
doing
now.
B
I
might
move
seven
above
six,
but
that's
like
maybe
the
same
thing
right
we
may
be
ready
to
to
put
in
some
yielding
assets.
I
think
like
pretty
soon
and
yeah
I
mean
I
think,
like
we're
really
talking
about
this
right
now.
I
think,
like
these
are
the
you
know,
six
through
nine.
These
are
the
things
that
we
should
be
talking
about,
trying
to
do
and
come
up
with
a
plan
and
then
yeah
stake.
Each
staking
is
obviously
in
this.
B
C
C
C
That's
the
best
way
to
learn
but
like
how
many
people
here
have
personally
done
that
and
if
you've
personally
done
it,
can
you
please
explain
exactly
how
it
works
to
dx
dao
and,
if
you're
comfortable
with
it
right,
because
I
don't
know,
there's
a
few
people
here
that
might
be
staking
eth
and
I
think
they're
doing
it
on
their
own,
but
using
a
third
party
to
do
it
like
yeah.
It
sounds
to
me
like
block
fi
and
I
hate
block
fi,
like
people
talk
about
block
fight
all
the
time.
C
B
Yeah,
I
would
say
before
the
stake,
wise
presentation,
I
thought
it
was
impossible
and
now
I'm
like
open,
maybe
to
the
idea
that
you
could
do
this
in
a
third
party
like
somewhat
trustless
way,
and
so
maybe
yeah
it's
more
in
the
d-gen
category
of
kind
of
like
yield
farming
if
it
is
kind
of
that
level
of
risk.
But,
like
I
mean
I
don't
know,
this
is
kind
of
our
broader
thing
about.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
like
connect
to
infrastructure
in
some
way.
B
I
think
that's
like
a
long
term.
I
think
for
geeksdown
to
have
some
type
of
organic
contribution
system
of
infrastructure
providers.
B
B
C
Which
is
multi-party
competition
is
the
only
way
to
do
truly
trustless
decentralized,
like
key
management,
and
this
is
what
all
the
big
exchanges
do
like.
There's
a
reason
why
someone
at
binance
or
gemini
can't
like
team
up
with
two
people
and
like
steal
all
the
money
from
from
gemini
right,
because
they
they
don't.
No
one
has
the
full
key,
but
but
what
we
want
and
there's
a
team
that
came
and
talked
to
us
about.
C
It
was
like
you
basically
need
to
have
a
dow
version
of
multi-party
computation
in
order
to
do
decentralized,
key
management
so,
like
the
actual
doubt
like
all
members
of
the
dow,
like
a
hundred
different
members
of
the
dow,
could
actually
all
hold
a
tiny
piece
of
a
key
and
actually
like
run
thing
run.
Infrastructure
with
that
key,
basically
or
the
security
be
so
cool.
B
Cool
yes,
we're
kind
of
over
the
hour
here.
Obviously,
people
left
go
to
the
omen
meeting
so
yeah
any
other
parting
thoughts.
A
Yeah
one
last
thing
from
me:
I'd
mentioned
to
you
last
night
and
I
guess
no
one's
here
now,
but
it's
the
last
day
of
the
quarter.
So
I'm
going
to
take
a
snapshot
of
the
current
participation
in
the
dx
discord
and
probably
work
with
the
eucharist
on
the
numbers
and
proposing
what
kind
of
rep
we
should
be
distributing
and
how
much
etc
per
tier.
But
that
is
underway.
So
those
of
you
that
don't
know
there's
a
90-day
callback
to
participation
on
the
discord.
A
So
I
propose
that
we
take
snapshots
each
quarter
and
and
distribute
some
rep
alongside
her
rep
boost
for
that.
So
that's
being
done
today
and
I'm
hoping
to
share
more
information
either
on
the
the
rep
boost
thread
or
in
a
thread
to
proceed
that
on
dow
talk.
B
Yeah
awesome
and
yeah.
I
just
think
it's
a
building
up
an
engagement
discord,
so
it
is
so
important,
so
yeah.
I
think
it
will
be
just
the
beginning,
there's
also
like
source
cred,
which
would
be
a
much
more
like
systematic
way
of
doing
it.
But
I
think
we
just
need
to
figure
out
how
to
like,
engage
with
those
that
are
engaging
with
us.
A
B
A
Yeah
I
had
I'd
spoke
with
john
about
it.
I've
always
been
interested
in
in
participating
in
governance,
but
I'm
sure
you
know
I
started
right
at
the
start
of
the
of
the
whole
run
and
gwei
was
already
like
250
when
I,
when
I
started
here,
I'm
like
jesus.
I
can't
really
do
anything
here,
so
I'm
really
happy
to
get
involved
with
you
know,
upsetting
down's
sake
and
voting
now
and
and
the
rep
syncs
have
been
great
to
see
from
myself
and
everyone
else
that
submitted
them.