►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-04-07]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
april
7th,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
on
mainnet.
There
are
currently
five
proposals,
boosted
or
pending
boosted.
Three
of
these
are
treasury
diversification
proposals,
one
for
susd
two
for
usdc
and
then
a
combined
one
for
su
susd
and
usdt,
and
once
these
are
executed,
we
will
hit
the
three
million
dollars
of
stable
coins
in
mainnet
treasury
there.
B
I
think
the
last
one
will
pass
sometime
in
the
weekend,
but
once
we
get
that
that'll
that'll
kind
of
just
have
the
three
million
of
each
of
those
outlined
in
the
original
proposal
on
in
in
treasury.
So
I
think
we'll
talk,
maybe
a
little
bit
later
about
the
next
treasury
authorization
proposal
and
but
that
does
not
include
stable
coins
that
are
in
swapper
on
xdi
or
maintenance,
which
I
think
is
about
another
like
700,
800
000.
B
and
then,
of
course,
there
is
the
big
proposal
that
is
slated
to
pass
in
just
under
30
hours
to
halt
the
bonding
curve.
So
by
halt
the
bonding
curve.
This
means
that
the
the
proposal
will
adjust
the
minimum
investment
amount
to
something
really
really
really
high.
B
I
can't
see
how
many
digits
there
are
augusto
and
there's
like
no
zeros
either
it's
like
just
like
the
maximum.
It's
the
maximum
integer
that
you
can
buy.
B
B
B
B
There's
also
funny
because,
like
we
have
fractional,
there's
a
fractional
token
out
there,
because
it's
like
the
total
supply
is
like
149
point,
149,
000.26
or
something,
and
so
I
guess
we'll
probably
like
stay
on
an
extra
0.26
token
for
eternity,
but
anyway
this
is
exciting.
This
is
like
a
big
change.
It's
actually
almost
like
I'm
almost
a
year
to
the
date
I
think
april
20th
was
when
dx
dow
voted
to
launch
the
bonding
curve
a
year
ago,
and
then
it
kicked
out
in
in
may
the
next
month.
B
So
a
pretty
wild
wild
ride
for
the
for
the
bonding
curve
there,
or
if
anyone
has
any
thoughts
on
the
proposal
or
we
will
do,
people
saw
it
on
twitter.
There
was
zed
had
done
a
fun
pause
image,
and
so
we
kind
of
set
that
around
yesterday
and
then
we'll
try
to
do
and
we'll
have
a
medium
article
about
the
passing
of
it
probably
go
out
on.
B
B
Cool
and
then
the
other
mainnet
proposal
is
update
to
swapper
to
alpha
six.
I
think
this
is
gonna
pass
in
the
next
couple
hours,
and
this
includes
the
network
switcher
there
so
swap
routines
have
been
cranking
out
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff,
and
so
this
is
a
new
release
and
I
think
omen
had
just
had
a
new
release
that
passed.
I
think
over
the
weekend
there
too
yeah.
C
It
also
includes
bow
swap
into
the
eco
running
the
next
time,
which
is
kind
of
cool,
because
it's
like
got
26
million
well,
it's
got
the
biggest
pool
and.
B
It's
like
untouched,
it's
basically
like
no
one's,
not
that
many
people
are
trading
on
the
funds,
because
the
funds
have
like
come
into
bow,
swap
to
be
staked
to
earn
bow
and
the
actual
like
trading
interface
for
battle.
Swap.
Is
that
not
not
two
up?
So
it
would
be
really
interesting
to
see
like
if
swapper
like
how
much
of
bow
swap
volume
swapper
is
driving,
but
that's
hard
to
figure
out
yeah.
C
We
don't
know
that
because
there's
no
analytics
or
tracking,
like
in
yeah,
like
a
regular
web
2
site,
you
you'd,
have
these
kinds
of
data,
but
we
don't.
We
don't
do
it
because
yeah,
I
think
mainly
the
main
blocker
is
like.
Is
there
a
descent
if
we
can
find
a
decentralized
way
to
do
it
in
a
transparent
way?
Where
no
single
person
could
like
own
the
data,
then
we
could
implement
something,
but.
B
But
yeah,
I
just
love
this
as
a
description
of
like
up
something
that
dx
ventures
can
fund
like
we're
kind
of
constantly
running
into
these
things
of
like
oh
wow.
This
is
a
tool
that
like
we
would
have,
but
of
course
like
no
one
out
there
has
it,
because
no
one
has
like
the
unique
need
of
us.
So
I
think
this
is
over
there.
Other
ones
like
that,
where
we
can
fund
people
they're
building
things
for
yeah,
I
mean
like
that's
like
a
pitch
there.
B
B
E
On
that,
I
guess
it's
slightly
related,
but
that
example
of
a
specific
need
that
dx
dow
has
we,
I
think-
and
we
have.
We
have
a
couple,
other
ideas
that
we've
been
talking
about
recently
and
I
and
we
got
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
like
write
that
up
as
a
like
a
like
a
memo,
I
I
kind
of
think
of
at
amazon
like
apparently
jeff
bezos,
makes
everyone
with
a
new
idea
like
write
a
two-pager.
E
If
you
can't
put
the
whole
idea
on
two
pages
of
like
what
is
needed
and
why
it's
good,
then
you
shouldn't
be
able
to
talk
about
it
right.
So,
if
someone,
if
like
there's
an
idea
that
someone
thinks
is
important,
if
someone
that,
like
really
wants
to
push
that
idea,
I
can
create
this
two-page
memo
that
could
kind
of
become
a
bounty
or
a
called
like.
E
Like
I'll,
spend
the
next
six
months
building
it
that's
kind
of
how
uniswap
was
built
right
like
we
just
need
a
kid
with
that's
willing
to
build
it
and
we
can
fund
them
and
he
can
make
what
we
need,
but
we
need
to
like
communicate
what
those
things
are
in
a
better
way,
because
right
now
we
just
like
talk
about
them,
but
we
don't
there's.
You
can't
show
it
to
someone
right
exactly
shark
tank
or
similar,
but
we
we
can
initiate
it.
We
just
need
to
communicate
it
basically.
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
idea
for,
like
you
know,
specific
problems
that
the
community
feels
are
like
high
priority
or
there's
like
a
kind
of
a
clear
need
for,
and
we
don't
have
a
solution
for
yet
like
actually
just
kind
of
creating.
I
could.
I
think
you
could
even
do
it
in
less
right.
Probably
like
a
one
page,
you
know
a
couple
paragraphs
just
describe
the
problem
and
like
have
a
standing
like
kind
of
like
request
for
proposal,
basically,
and
maybe
even
with
some
amounts
tied
to.
B
That
definitely-
and
I
love
the
memo
idea
in
general-
I
think
that's
like
a
good
way
of
capturing
information.
I
think
amazon
does
it
where,
like
they
make
people
read
it
before.
You
start
the
meeting.
So
it's
like
they're
five
minutes
of
silence,
while
everyone's
reading,
what
the
meeting
is
about,
and
then
they
have
the
meeting
but
anyway,
okay
and
then
on
to
xdi
base.
B
There
are
13
proposals
boosted
or
pending
boosting
most
of
these
are
related
to
a
swap
or
liquidity
deposit.
There's
four
pairs
that
we're
putting
in
so
there's
eight
proposals
total
one.
Each
of
the
pairs
have
a
funding
proposal
and
a
liquidity,
provisioning
proposal
in
the
multi-call
scheme.
This
all
of
these
pairs
already
have
existing
liquidity
on
swapper,
and
I
think
this
is
will
just
top
up
all
of
them.
It
will
make,
I
think,
all,
but
the
west
dpi
pair,
the
largest
on
xdi
or
close
to
it.
B
I
think
the
bow
swap
has
a
large
wet
dpi
pair,
but
we
should
have
the
largest
after
this
proposal
goes
through.
I
think
it's
in
two
and
a
half
days.
We
should
have
the
largest
wef
x,
dipole
on
x,
I
like
six
hundred
thousand
and
then
just
as
like
a
shout.
I
did
also
just
post
a
proposal
yesterday
about
an
additional
round
of
liquidity
to
go
into
swapper
in
those
four
pairs
and
then
an
additional
pair
for
steak,
just
because
that's
the
the
native
token
for
x
died.
B
So
if
you
have
any
thoughts
on
like
the
next
round
of
swapper
liquidity
direct
to
that
that
threat.
B
Yeah
and
then
there's
just
a
bunch
of
different
worker
proposals:
kaiden
gemino,
melanie
venki
myself.
We
did,
we
are
still
kind
of
getting
better
at
getting
proposals
through
and
boosting.
We
had
a
have
had
a
little
bit
of
a
clogged
proposal
cue
over
the
last
week
or
two.
A
lot
of
that
is
because
of
these
liquidity
proposals
and
they
like
clog
clogged
things
up
and
yeah.
If
you
have
any,
I
think
I
noticed
I
think
federico's
proposal
might
have
become
unboosted
recently.
B
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
that
one,
but
remember
that
the
amount
of
gen
you
need
is
not
based
upon
the
current
number
of
boosted
proposals,
but
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
in
24
hours
after
you
stake.
So
if
you
want
to
make
sure
it
gets
boosted
up,
make
sure
and
calculate
that
additionally,
on
xdi,
we've
had
also
have
had
some
problem
with
alchemy
syncing
with
the
graph.
So
we
had
some
issues
on
this
on
friday
with
proposals
not
showing
up.
B
I
know
this
is
tough
for
a
couple
people
that
had
were
doing
their
proposals
for
the
first
time
and
go
to
the
whole
process
of
submitting
and
then
it
doesn't
show
up,
but
I
think
we've
got
all
of
that
settled
now
and
yeah.
That's
it
for
xdi.
I
don't
know
if
there
were
any
thoughts
or
questions
on
xdi.
B
Cool
yeah
and
then
just
moving
on
to
regular
business.
Just
to
give
a
brief
update
on
that,
the
gas
refunds
we
had
posted
the
list
for
q1
last
week
on
thursday.
I
think
there
was
some.
The
script
was
not
picking
up
everything,
specifically
as
it
related
to
redemption
costs
and
all
redemption
costs
are
actually
like
incurred
by
one
address.
B
So
I'm
not
we're
trying
to
figure
out
that
precisely
what
that
is,
and
then
we'll
update
the
amounts
and
then
we'll
get
we'll
get
the
amounts
and
then
we'll
do
a
proposal
and
fund
those
again
on
mainnet
nico.
I
don't
know
if
you
had
any
specific
thoughts
or
if
you
had
any
like,
did
you
figure
out
why
redemptions
are
being
done
through
that
that
one
contract
yep?
I.
F
Indeed,
checked
it
earlier
today
and
it's
interesting
something
I
wasn't
really
aware
of
they're
kind
of
like
two
different
contracts,
depending
on
what
you
are
actually
redeeming.
So
let's
say
it's
eve
or
it's
dxd.
F
You
are
using
another
contract
as
if
you're,
using
an
external
contract
and
that's
the
reason.
So
we
actually
just
had
one
of
those
two
contracts
in
the
redemption
scripts
and
I
am
currently
in
contact
with
daostack
for
the
other
contracts.
It's
unfortunately
not
verified
yet
on
mainnet,
which
makes
it
a
bit
more
complicated
to
see
what's
actually
going
up
there,
but
I
hope
the
dowstek
team
can
help
and
verify
that
contract
and
we
can
update
the
redemption
script
there
as
well
to
take
those
transactions
into
account.
B
Cool
well,
thank
you
for
figuring
that
out.
I
know,
that's
that's
kind
of
a
pain,
especially
because,
if
it's
unverified,
I
guess
that
means
it
doesn't
show
up
on
like
ether,
scan
or
or
anything
but
cool.
Well,
hopefully,
we'll
get
that
solved
in
the
next
week
or
so
here
and
we'll
get
the
refunds
out.
B
Next,
just
wanted
to
on
these
calls,
I
thought
it'd
be
kind
of
a
good
opportunity
that
we
just
kind
of
have
to
check
in
with
hr
and
peoplemover
stuff.
I
think
we're
still
figuring
out
what
we're
calling
those
things
so,
there's
kind
of
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
terms
of
tracking
working
on
making
the
proposal
process
better
for
for
people
melanie,
actually
just
submitted
her
proposal
through
alchemy
and
so
went
through
that
process.
B
So
yeah,
I
thought
it'd
be
a
good
opportunity
for
on
these
calls
to
just
have
like
a
check
in
with
hr
people
move
your
stuff
and
whether
melanie
melanie
has
business
or
there's
other
questions.
We
can
kind
of
carve
out
this
time
in
the
call
so
melanie.
Do
you
want
to
give
a
brief
update.
G
Yeah
sure
and
I,
and
I'm
definitely
more
than
happy
to
carve
out
a
time
on
this
governance
call
just
to
to
talk
about
hr
and,
like
the
contributor
experience,
so
just
an
update
about
what
we're
doing
in
the
people
mover
contributor
experience
squad
ali
and
I
are
beginning
to
track
dxd
payments,
for
example,
whether
it's
been
issued
or
not.
How
much
is
owed
and
dates
of
proposal
submission
while
we
will
be
tracking
it
internally.
G
It
may
also
be
beneficial
that
each
of
you
has
your
own
personal
record
as
well
in
the
event
that
we
contact
you
to
just
clarify
anything
also.
We
are
aware
that
many,
if
not
most
of
you,
have
not
submitted
your
dxd
investing
proposals
requesting
your
payments,
mainly
this
is
because
of
the
cost
on
of
gas
on
mainnet
chris,
I
see
you
raising
your
hand
so
yeah.
We
are
aware
and
circling
back
to
worker
proposals.
G
G
We
will
be
adding
a
few
contributor
experience,
sections
of
our
own
and
help
with
any
any
additions
to
the
current
content,
and
if
there
are
any
new
contributors
on
this
call
hello
and
welcome,
do
not
hesitate
to
reach
out
to
ali
or
myself
with
any
general
questions
regarding
onboarding
and
next
steps
with
your
proposal,
recruitment
has
also
been
a
hot
topic
lately.
So
if
you
know
anyone
who
is
interested
or
fits
the
role
of
any
of
our
open
positions,
let
us
know
we'd
be
happy
to
engage
them.
D
B
It's
really
helpful,
even
just
already
in
terms
of
having
melanie
and
ali
just
like
walk
people
through
the
process
and
be
comfortable
like
going
to
them
and
asking
questions
and
like
I
guess
the
word
like
hub
is
thrown
around
here
in
terms
of
trying
to
create
a
contributor
hub
where
people
can
go
for
information,
but
in
a
lot
of
ways
the
hub
will
be
like
melanie
and
ali
themselves
right
because
they
will
be
a
lot
of
the
communication
flows
will
be
going
through
them.
B
So
I
think
they'll
be
great
resources
for
people
that
have
questions
on
like
very
random,
random
things,
because
they'll
start
to
aggregate
all
of
those
inputs
and
so
yeah
and
I
think,
in
terms
of
a
proposal
process.
I
think
we're
we're
gonna
be
making
it.
So
the
contributor
experience
is
much
more
smoothly.
I
like
that
that,
for
its
contributor
experience
cool
any
any
kind
of
hr,
related
items
or
things,
the
contributor
experience
related
items
that
people
want
to
bring.
H
I
I
just
I
just
added
a
new
topic
on
dao
talk.
It
was
like
15
minutes
ago
before
the
talk
where
I'm
requesting
a
new
type
of
compensation
based
on
the
work
that
I
did
this
month
so
yeah
I
just
I
I
started
I
check
out
with
other
with
our
excel
workers,
so
maybe
this
would
be
an
interesting.
I
I
don't
think
to
add
on
the
on
on
the
contribution
guidelines
where,
when
I
submit
when
I
created
the
this
out
of
topic-
or
I
was
talking
with
another
with
other
deals-
are
working,
they
were
asking
me,
so
you
are
going
to
stop
being
a
full-time
contributor.
Are
you
going
to
be
a
contractor
now,
so
I
won't
call
it
like
that.
I
As
a
contractor,
I
think
that
maybe
the
contribution
guidance
are
missing,
some
a
part
where
it
can
allow
the
worker
or
the
contributor
here
to
be
more
flexible,
so
they
can
still
be
attached
on
the
organization
like
showing
the
course
talk
with
other
talk
with
other
people.
Right
now
you
know
be
still
engaged,
but
in
their
own
terms
and
how
they
see
fit
so
yeah.
I
This
may
be
something
that
we
can
explore
like
we
have
workers
and
we
have
full-time
people
who
are
comedians,
who
have
working
a
lot
and
we
have
their
hours
work
and
they
are
organized
and
you
have
contributors
that
they
are
individuals
or
companies
that
are
going
to
be
part
of
the
actual,
but
maybe
in
in
in
our
terms
right.
So
it
will
be
interesting
if
we
can
explore
those
type
of
engagement
in
the
in
in
the
future.
Maybe
in
the
following
months,.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
a
great
point
not
to
put
some
things
on
the
contributor
experience
plate,
but
I
think
we
are
due
for
overhaul
might
be
an
aggressive
word,
but
a
a
large
update,
I
think,
to
the
contributor
guidelines
and
the
compensation
guidelines
in
general,
and
I
imagine
that's
something
that
maybe
it's
not
like
the
first
thing
we
can
challenge
right
now,
but
in
like
the
next
month
or
two.
I
think
we
need
to
take
a
more
like
systematic
approach.
G
Is
long
overdue
and
completely
understanding
that
people's
circumstances
in
their
life
change
and
we
need
to
be
flexible,
and
you
know,
updating
to
accommodate
people's
just
lives
is
something
that
we
can
definitely
do
so
thanks
for
bringing
that
to
our
attention,
you
know
and
putting
that
front
and
center
center
when
we
think
about
reevaluating
what
we
currently
have.
I
Yeah,
even
uber
marques
has
wanted
to
also
mark
that
this
is
generalization
that
we
have
workers
spread
all
around
the
world
working
in
different
cities
and
with
different
lights
with
different.
You
know
with
different
lifestyles
all
around,
so
it's
not
like.
We
are
a
company
based
in
you
know,
bulgaria,
right
where
we
know
everyone
works
in
bulgaria.
I
What
some
do
they
eat,
like
you
know,
so
I
think
flexibility
is
should
be
very
important
here,
because
yeah
we
are
all
around
the
world.
We
need
to
be
flexible
to
allow
everyone
to
be
the
exact
member.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
way
you
did
it
was
like
actually
very
positive
for
the
dx
down
like
you,
contributed
work
and
then
ask
for
compensation.
I
think
we
should
even
like,
encourage
and
be
very
positive
about
that
and
really
try
to
make
sure
that
people
who
put
work
first
and
then
get
paid
like
we
need
to
make
sure
that
they
there's
like
like
a
99
chance
that
they
will
get
paid
and
well.
B
It's
a
it's
a
labor
version
of
member
balancer
right,
so
the
idea
being
you're
committing
first
and
then
you're
kind
of
like
trusting
that
the
dow
will
will
do
and
I
think,
like
goose.
I
think
flexibility
is
a
good
order.
I
think
scaling
is
another
good
word
like
we
need
to
figure
out
how
we
can
scale
to
more
contributors.
That
means
different
types
of
contributors.
That
means
a
whole
bunch
of
different
backgrounds,
and
I
think
the
current
system
is
not
necessarily
one
that
can
scale
to
meet
all
of
our
needs.
I
Yeah
and
also
like
adding
to
what
hero
said,
but
on
what
do
you
work?
I
mean.
Maybe
you
work
on
something
that
is
super
useful
and
helpful
for
you
on
the
exile.
But
when
you
submit
your
one,
you
ask
your
compensation.
It's
like
meh.
You
know
this
wasn't
so
important
for
the
rest
of
the
community
and
suddenly
you
get
like
okay,
but
I
want
to
get
paid
for
it,
but
this
is
what
it
wasn't,
but
this
is
not
on
our
roadmap
right.
What,
if
I
know
a
new
contributor
appears
hey.
I
I
built
this
awesome
that
and
they
show
it
and
they
say
I
want
you
the
exact
to
have
it
and
we
see
it
up
and
it,
and
it
is
like
you
know,
so
we
need
to.
I
think
it's
awesome
to
work
and
then
be
paid
after
that,
but
we
need
to
organize
ourselves
to
work
on.
What's
it
or
what
is
important
for
the
exile
or
at
least
not
to
lose
track
of
sight
on
our
mission.
A
But
like
I,
I
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
the
people
who
commit
their
like
full-time
work,
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
reward
them
for
that
right,
like
they
are
not
as
flexible
as
our
gusto.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
those
people
who
commit
fully
should
get
rewarded.
Yeah.
K
But
you
can
just
state
that
in
your
worker
proposal
you
know
and
you
get
feedback
from
the
community
about
how
much
you
want
you'd
like
to
be
compensated
for
that
and
if
we
all
agree
upon,
like
you've,
been
doing
at
gusto.
I
will
there's
no
reason
that
we
can't
go
forward
with
that.
And
then
you
know
you
get
your
first
50
percent
payment
at
the
beginning,
and
the
question
is:
is
you
know
what
you
promised
to
deliver?
K
Did
you
deliver
it
at
the
end
and
usually
99
of
the
time?
It's
yes
and
you
get
the
second
payment,
but
if
it's
questionable
as
to
anybody,
if
they
you
know
followed
through
on
what
they
said,
they
were
going
to
do
then
yeah
the
dow
may
or
may
not
pay
that
person
for
their
work.
That's
just
like
right,
like
any
any.
That's,
usually
just
how
dis,
regardless
of
where
the
company's
based
that's.
I
think
how
it's
going
to
go
and
that's
pretty
damn
flexible.
I
would
say.
J
I
saw
it
but
yeah
that's
good
okay,
so
I
I
actually
like
us
to
to
maybe
start
talking
about
one
thing
we
discussed
earlier
this
year
and
it's
about
team
tokens,
even
though
we
don't
have
team
tokens
yet
like
having
team
goals
where
a
whole
team
can
complete
something
a
milestone
as
a
team
or
a
squad
where
we
yeah,
like
first
of
all,
can
have
like
a
nice
reward
to
get
people
joining
us
or
to
yeah
compensate
hard
work
right.
J
So
if
we
have,
if
we
have
goals
set
to
dates,
maybe
I
think
we
should
reward
work.
That
can
I
work
outside
of
our
original
pay,
and
maybe
it's
easier
to
have
that
when
we
have
our
like,
let's
say
swapper
token
omen
token.
C
Yeah,
I
think
both
tokens
and
milestone-based
rewards
are
interesting.
I've
actually
been
meaning
to
write
a
post
on
dow
talk
about
like
milestone,
pace,
rewards
and
I
think
it
could
be
cool
to
like
yeah
tie
some
extra
like
reward
to
like
a
job
well
done,
something
that
makes
like
a
big
impact
and
and
like
having
that
be
sort
of
part
of
the
culture.
I
think
yeah.
J
I
mean
we,
we
kind
of
get
the
critique
of
hey
we're
just
on
a
payroll
and
we're
gonna
pay
from
a
dow,
and
we
we
are
the
those
like.
We
can
decide
what
we
get
paid
and
stuff
like
that.
If
we
have,
I
would
say
if
we,
if
we
try
to
reward
ourselves
with
with
the
milestones,
we
can
actually
show
like
hey,
no
we're
not
just
working
and
draining
the
dow
right,
we
actually
working
towards
milestones
and
and
if
we
don't
complete
them,
we
don't
like
reward
ourselves
with.
H
Yeah
yeah.
I
think
that
that
would
be
very
great.
I
was
thinking,
for
example,
like
the
last
omen
release.
We
had,
for
example,
if
we
had
the
milestone
if
we
complete
this
milestone
by
this
date.
Like
I
don't
know,
we
would
get
like
some
reward,
like
maybe
we
would
work
over
the
weekend,
maybe
like
we
were
some
insane
hours
to
meet
that,
and
then
we
would
like
get
rewarded
for
it.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
definitely
like
a
multi-multi-pronged
approach
that
we
can
kind
of
incorporate
a
bunch
of
different
things
to
make
it
appealing
and
incentivize
people
in
different
ways.
We
just
need
to
think
about
how
we
kind
of
fit
all
these
things
together.
I
do
want
to
keep
going
because
I
know
people
are
jumping
to
a
meeting
at
the
top
of
the
hour.
I
wanted
to
touch
briefly
on
the
new
multi-call
scheme.
B
F
Yep,
I
can
at
least
give
a
short
update,
so
the
things
that
we
were
actually
waiting
for
was
that
somebody
deployed
the
gnosis
protocol
relays.
That
meanwhile
happened
both
on
extire
and
minute.
We
have
the
addresses
for
it
and
we
wanted
to
double
check
with
frederico
about
the
farming
contracts
if
there
needs
to
be
something
white
listed
as
of
now,
but
we
don't
need
it
for
now.
F
B
Sweet
and
then
yeah,
I
guess
we
actually
already
talked
about
alchemy
graph
issues,
that
there
were
some
issues
with
the
alchemy
in
the
graph
and
I
think
not
much
to
else
to
report,
except
for
we're
working
with
dow
stock
on
trying
to
make
alchemy
on
x
to
as
usable
as
possible,
and
then
this
also
kind
of
underscores
the
importance
of
working
on
dx
to
vote,
which
does
not
rely
on
the
sub-graph
or
it's
time
to
rely
on
the
graph.
B
So
I
think
that'll
be
something
that
we'll
be
thinking
about
a
little
bit
more
and
maybe
trying
to
develop
some
resources
into
that.
I
think,
particularly
if
we're
thinking
about
dx
vote,
if
we
want
to
get
a
governance
structure
up
on
arbor
trump,
so.
B
Cool
and
then
yeah,
I'm
just
seeing
dxd
older
24's
comment
in
the
chat
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
just
kind
of
talking
about
different
ways
of
incentivizing
people,
and
I
think
our
goal,
because
of
the
incentive
structure
now
is
to
drive
the
price
drive
value
to
dxd,
considering
most
of
individuals,
compensation
is
in
dxd.
Actually
one
of
the
things
that
I
want
to
talk
about
today
in
terms
of
driving
price
to
txd
is
dxt
buyback
programs.
B
So
I
just
made
a
proposal
or
sorry
a
dow
talk
post
on
this
today.
I
want
to
share
my
screen
quickly,
yeah,
and
so
this
is
supposed
to
be
kind
of
the
start
of
the
process,
and
so
I
just
want
to
kind
of
lay
out
some
of
the
different
things
that
we're
trying
to
do
here.
B
B
So
the
way
that
I'm
kind
of
we're
thinking
of
structuring
this
is
basically
this
post
would
be
the
first
signal
proposal
to
convey
the
intentions
to
repurchase
dxd
according
to
certain
conditions,
once
that
would
pass,
then
we
would
move
to
execute
that
trade
through
separate
proposals
and
requires
actually
two
proposals
to
actually
execute
trades
with
that.
B
So
this
is
meant
to
be
like
the
proposal
that
we
basically
kind
of
all
agreed
to
the
the
program
here
and
the
way
that
it's
like
laid
out
is
if
this,
if
this
proposal
passes
basically
like
this,
is
the
announcement
that
we
would
want
to
kind
of
convey
to
everyone.
This
would
be
the
public-facing
announcement.
B
It'd
be
like
deke
style
has
agreed
to
this,
and
this
is
the
conditions
that
would
kind
of
be
like
publicly
putting
ourselves
out
there
and
that's
what
we
have
for
like
the
announcement
page
and
that
would
detail
the
specifics
of
the
program
and
everything
like
such
as
that,
and
then
we
have
several
different
like
risk
and
considerations
or
documents
and
disclosures
that
we're
working
on
here.
So
there's
a
bunch
of
these
that
start
the
tami's
been
putting
together
a
lot
most
of
these
too.
B
So
we've
been
working
on
on
this
and
also
with
dave
on
some
of
the
treasury
stuff.
But
the
kind
of
additional
documents
we're
trying
to
put
together
are
one.
This
consolidate
consolidated
balance
sheet,
and
so
this
is
where
some
of
the
dxd
payments
and
regular
payments
that
were
where
missing
comes
are
really
important.
So
we
need
to
update
these
numbers,
but
I
did
my
best
actually
to
go
back
and
look
at
some
of
the
payments
that
may
be
deferred
in
both
dxd
and
also
people
that
have
not
done
their
proposals.
B
So
I've
estimated
that
here
and
then
yeah
this
balance
sheet
is
just
looking
at
the
mainnet
treasury.
The
x
die
base
the
buyback
reserve-
and
you
know
it's
kind
of
landing
on
this
final
value
here
for
net
assets,
which
should
be
30
37.9
million,
and
this
is
what
this
would
be.
What
would
be
considered
like
book
value
that
we
would
be
be
having
there
and
there's
yeah?
There's
a
google
sheet
with
with
all
the
supporting
information
on
there.
B
As
I
said,
a
lot
of
that
is
based
upon
the
value
of
the
treasury
and
different
index
science
and
and
elsewhere,
but
it
also
includes
some
estimates
on
the
liabilities
in
terms
of
dxd
compensation
and
regular
compensation
for
the
last
couple
months,
so
that
we
can
have
an
idea
of
that.
As
I
said,
the
risk
factors
it's
a
document
tammy
put
together,
that
is
denied.
B
It's
got
things
you
should
be
scared
of
to
be
fearful
of
because
the
risk,
and
then
we
have
a
governance
overview
document
that
just
intended
to
kind
of
provide
some
information
on
geeksdow
and
how
things
operate,
how
rep
holders
kind
of
exert
influence
and
also
outline
the
move
to
governance,
2.0
and
then
dxd
average
trade
volume.
This
is
just
a
supporting
document
to
show
how
much
like
on-chain
volume
there
has
been
for
dxd.
B
I
had
pulled
this
about
three
weeks
ago
and
it
was
162k,
and
so
I
think
it'll
be
actually
about
that.
But
I
need
I
need
to
update
that
information,
and
then
this
is
a
document
I
have
not
produced
yet,
but
I
want
to
have
a
technical
explainer
for
a
technical
explainer
for
the
like
gp
relayer,
and
so
this
will
be.
B
I
actually
have
some
of
the
bases
I
think
from
the
relayer
that
worked
with
before,
but
this
will
kind
of
just
provide
very
specific
details
on
that
and
that's
actually
the
one.
I
think
I
need
to
to
work.
B
We
need
to
work
on
the
most
here
and
just
in
terms
of
like
next
steps
or
the
things
that
were
we'd
be
hoping
to
do
so,
presenting
briefly
today
on
the
governance
discussion
and
then
I
think,
there's
a
couple
different
things
we
need
to
discuss,
but
hopefully
we
can
discuss
in
the
forum
here
on
the
call
and
reach
something
I'm
hoping
to
get
a
this
proposal
submitted
next
wednesday
and
then
corresponding
to
this
timeline.
B
We
are
installing
the
multi
call
and
scheme
installation
which
nico
just
touched
on
and
when
that
gets
launched
it
takes
17
days
submitted.
It
takes
17
days
to
be
fully
in
in
installed
and
once
that's
fully
installed,
then
we
can
actually
execute
the
trades.
So
presumably
this
signal
proposal
will
pass
while
the
multi-call
scheme
is
being
installed
during
that
17
days
to
discuss
today.
B
Like
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
there's
agreement
that
we
need
to
do
this
to
kind
of
return
value
and
given
the
the
state
of
the
treasury,
but
to
discuss
today
is
like
details
of
the
first
trade
I've
put
35k
at
a
2.5
percent
above
unit
swap
top
12
price.
B
That's
based
upon
using
140k
average
trading
volume,
the
definition
of
book
value
so
for
book
value,
I've
included
everything
on
tr
on
geeksdale's
balance
sheet,
except
for
things
in
the
buyback
reserve,
because
we
can't
actually
control
that
now,
but
including
like
swapper
lp
tokens
stable
coins,
everything
in
that
and
also
on
on
xdi,
and
then
it
would
be
good
to
discuss.
B
Do
we
want
to
do
this
as
a
signal
proposal
on
xdi,
or
do
we
really
also
want
to
do
it
on
on
mainnet
and
yeah
and
then
other
other
thoughts,
so
yeah?
What
are
kind
of
people?
Thinking
about
this?
What
are
the
steps
or
really
just
these,
these
kind
of
discussion
points
here.
B
C
There's
certainly
more
txt
on
mainnet,
I
mean,
of
course,
like
the
vast
majority
of
it
still
is,
but
I
mean
I
guess
in
either
case
the
orders
are
going
through
gnosis
protocol
so
like
the
arbitrage
would
have
to
happen
across
and
to
notice
this
protocol
anyways.
I
don't
know
I
mean,
maybe
it's
not
unreasonable
to
do
it
on
extant,
I'm
not
sure.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
was
thinking
it
would
just
I
mean
I
just
had
2.5
above
obviously
like
the
this
will
be
public
information,
so
someone
would
be
able
to
manipulate
the
price
like
before
it
would,
you
know
execute,
so
there
is
some
risk
there
that
we
would
have
to
put
a
ban,
but
yeah
I
mean
do
we
need
what
would
the
premium
need
to
be,
or
maybe
we
just
kind
of
try
it.
Try
it
out
right
if
no
one
bites.
F
On
the
cheap,
gp
relayer,
I
mean
first
yeah,
so
with
the
multi
call,
we
actually
can
batch
trades.
We
haven't
done
the
gas
fee
tests.
How
many
actually
go
into
one
proposal,
but
I
would
say,
like
five
to
seven
would
probably
even
be
possible
and
we
can
set
a
certain
start
and
end
times,
so
we
could
in
theory,
we'll
create
five
traits
and
set
the
early
state.
They
can
be
executed
on
gp,
that's
possible
yeah.
B
Yeah,
so
we
could
alternately
do
that
like
set
100k
to
the
relayer,
I
sent
100k
to
the
relayer
and
then
do
that
across
four
trades
like
every
day,
and
so
then
the
trade
would
actually
only
be
25k
a
day.
F
A
F
Yeah
so
the
background
for
that
is
like
the
gauss
fees
on
mainnet
and
that's
why
gnosis
at
some
point
decided
to
only
submit
solutions
from
the
solvers
over
2.5
k
value
and
that's
on
mainnet
on
x-style.
We
don't
have
that
limitations,
because
gas
costs
are
almost
free
on
x-9.
B
I
actually
really
like
the
xdi
idea,
it's
more
of
like
will
that
require
like
additional
implementation
or
like
considerations,
and
I
think
like,
for
my
perspective,
I'm
just
trying
to
like
what
do
we?
What's
the
quickest
possible
move,
because
I
think
like
executing
on
this
move
is
the
most
important
because
it's,
I
think
it
sends
a
signal
to
the
market,
but
I
do
like
xdi
if
that's
doable
in
without
work.
A
F
Yep,
actually,
the
gpu
layer
is
deployed
both
on
xdi
and
and
mainnet,
and
it
has
already
been
tested
on
extra
as
well.
B
Cool
I
mean
we
could
just
change
this
a
little
bit
to
you
know.
This
is
because
this
is
supposed
to
be
like
the
signal
proposal
initiating
the
buyback
program,
but
this
is
separate
from
the
actual
proposals
that
would
do
the
buyback.
So
we
could
just
say
that
the
buyback
program
is
active
on
xdi
and
mainnet,
and
then
we
could
execute
through
both
and
like
when
we're
actually
executing
it
might
be
cool
to
do
the
first
one
on
xdi
kind
of
as
a
test
and
then
could
do
others
on
on
mainnet.
A
Yeah
I
like
that,
like
especially
like
just
seeing
like
I
actually
expect
we
will
have
way
better
results
on
next
time.
Just
because,
like
I
remember,
participating
on
the
icon
miser
and
then
like
you
moving
stuff
into
misa,
and
then
you
don't
you're
not
lucky,
then
you
wasted
200
bucks
and
on
next
day
you
actually
didn't
waste.
Anything.
You
just
moved
a
little
bit
of
stuff
around
and
actually
try
to
participate
and
then
you're,
not
not
annoyed
of
not
like
not
winning
the
game
and
on
managers
will
be
probably
different.
B
C
I
don't
know,
though
I
mean
I
think,
since
most
of
the
existing
trading
volume
is
on
main
net,
that's
an
argument
to
keep
it
on
main
net
there's
also
a
little
bit
of
a
price
discrepancy
between
extend
mainnet,
often
but
yeah.
I
don't
know.
A
A
C
C
Dimension
to
this
too,
and
there's
some
discussion
about
this
yesterday
on
the
discord
like
like
lack
of
txt
liquidity,
is
a
problem
right
and,
and
I
think
the
way
to
address
that
would
be
through
an
incentive
like
a
liquidity,
mining
campaign
or.
B
But
I
guess
I
think
we
can
do
both
right,
like
I
don't
think
you
can't
like
do
one
buyback
like
you
could
do
a
25k
trade.
You
could
do
a
10k
trade
and
I
think,
like
the
signal
of
that
independent
of
its
effect
on
liquidity,
is
incredibly
important
and
then
I
think,
like
once
we
signal
that
you
know
and
kind
of
convey
the
value
that
dc
is
is
capturing.
B
Then
I
think
that's
also
like
the
way
that
we
increase
liquidity
at
large,
but
I
don't
see
how,
like
the
current
liquidity
landscape,
is
affected
like
why
we
couldn't
do
a
25k
trade
in
this
liquidity,
landscape.
C
You
can
do
it,
there's
just
going
to
be
significant
slippage
right
unless
more
liquidity
comes
to
play,
but
yeah.
No,
I
mean
I'm
not
saying
that
it
doesn't
make
sense,
but,
like
I
think
it's
a
separate
and
but
also
it's
it's
its
own
problem,
that
liquidity
is
not
good
and
then
it's
sort
of
related
to
the
buyback
too
right
because,
ideally,
like
you'd,
be
doing
it
with
like
peace
and
liquidity.
B
A
Yeah,
like
I
don't
like
the
like
that
we
do
on
the
first
buyback
on
our
next
day,
is
actually
not
pushing
us
back
in
any
way.
I
think
it's
actually
better
to
to
do
the
first
thing
or
next
just
to
see
how
everything
works
and
that
it
actually
works
and
like
we
should
actually
do
both
just
try
to
buy
back
on
both
sides.
B
Cool
just
in
terms
of
next
steps,
some
of
these
docs
need
to
be
updated,
but
comments.
I
think
the
one
thing
big
thing
to
add
that
I'll,
try
to
add
to
the
post
is
the
x
die
because
I
was
not
included
in
that
and
then
like.
Hopefully,
we
can
have
feedback
and
comments
for
the
next
week
and
then
try
to
get
this
into
signal
proposal
by
next
wednesday.
B
I
was
happy
to
talk.
I
thought
we
were
talking
about
dxd
like
we
were
talking
about
supporting
the
price
of
dxt,
so
it
was
kind
of
the
things
and
I
think
all
feedback
is
is
good.
I
think
we
we
should
be
open
to
feedback,
but
I
think
it's
like
we
want
to
like
stay
focused
on
the
task
at
hand
which
is
literally
responding
to
that
that
feedback,
so
that
was.
E
And
it's
good
to
hear
this
feedback
it.
It
is
a
little
tricky
when
it's
an
anonymous
person
that
comes
in
for
the
first
time
in
a
long
time
and
then
just
complains,
but
he
doesn't
give
to
violet's
point.
He
doesn't
give
any
any
suggestions
on
like
what
we
could
do
to
help
accomplish,
what
he's
trying
to
say
other
than
the
one.
The
three
things
that
we're
talking
about
already
that
are
trying
to
do
the
same
thing
right
like
what
else
could
give
us
at
least
one
idea
that
you
have
or
something
right.
A
John,
you
already
made
a
good
point
that
a
few
yield
farming
programs
will
already
like
give
an
answer
to.
What
can
I
do
with
my
dxd?
And
that's
I
mean
that's
the
market
sentiment.
Everyone
can
let
their
tokens
work
and
I
think
it
doesn't
hurt
for
us
to
actually
give
out
some
tokens
to
appreciate
our
dxd
owners.
B
Yeah
I
want
to
next
week.
I
want
to
start
another
post,
that's
about
a
dxd
farming
campaign.
That's
the
same
thing
and
we
I've
we've
tossed
around
some
numbers
there
like
last
week,
dxd
has
gone
up
a
bit
since
then,
so
it
should
be
better,
but
just
getting
that
process
started.
B
So
we
can
figure
out
how
to
do
like
a
very
targeted
farming
campaign
for
swapper
and
on
both
xdi
and
mainnet,
and
just
allocate
some
dxd
for
that,
not
something
that's
widespread,
but
something
focused
very
much
on
the
dxd
eth
pair
and
then
like
two
dxd
holders
like
questions
or
complaints,
like,
I
think,
a
buyback
program
followed
by
a
dxd
farming
program
on
swapper
multi-chain
is
a
good
way
to
drive
value
to
txd,
and
I
think
that's
like
where
we're
headed
for
the
next.
I
B
Yeah
that
was
actually
just
the
the
last
point
and
we
got
people
running
to
the
the
kind
of
treasury.
I
wanted
to
chat
about
just
because
we
had
discussed
last
week
and
I
guess
sky
you
had
not.
I
think
I
saw
a
draft
of
a
treasury
authorization
proposal,
but
maybe
that
was
just
an
internal
draft
and
yeah
and
then
we're
having
the
meeting
tomorrow
will
be
a
q1
treasury
update
from
from
dave.
B
E
I
Yeah
exactly
that
is
something
that
may
we
should
do
in
our
listing
and
see
how
decentralized
these
d5
protocols
are
again.
We
should
start
with
the
with
the
one
that
had
the
lowest
the
lowest
revenues,
because
those
were
actually
going
to
be
the
more
realistic
ones,
for
example,
now
looking
at
them.
If
you
are
lending
ether
at
an
eight
percent
revenue
per
year
like
that
is,
that
is
not
something
where
how
can
I
say
you
can
you
need
to
have
control
over
the
over
data?
I
So
we
need
to
find
the
file
ending
protocols
that
are
completely
centralized
check
out.
Their
smart
contracts
also
came
up
on
a
strategy
of
how
are
we
going
to
lend
the
ether
and
how
are
we
going
to
claim
it?
So
there
is
a
lot
of
logistics
around
it,
but
we
should
start
exploring
that,
at
least
with
a
small
amount
yeah,
I
guess,
for
example,
we
would
be
a
good
nation
start.
I
We
check
out
compound
smart
contracts,
we
see
which
function
that
we
need
to
make
to
the
compound
protocol
to
start
sharing
it
to
start
lending,
some
ether
and
later
we
claim
it
and
we
do
the
entire
procedure
we
test
it
and
we
see
how
it
works.
E
B
I
mean
I
I
agree
we
could
do
both
but
like
point
three
percent
on
eth
at
compound,
like
we're
not
gonna,
we
got
a
lot
of
if
we're
not
gonna
sell
right
like
that's
something,
but
to
your
point
I
definitely
think
stable
coins
are
are
what
we're
looking
for
now,
but
I
definitely
think
we
should
be
looking
for
safe
ways
to
earn
yield
off
of
east.
I
C
Curve
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
It's
just
there's
a
lot
going
on
already
and
it
would
be
a
major
undertaking.
I
I
I
again,
I
think
the
reserve
of
ether
is
if
something
that
the
dxd
holders
control
is
the
reserve
of
italy,
the
cure,
so
the
more
the
higher
reserve
of
eater
that
you
have
and
the
cure
the
more
happy
they're
going
to
be
because
they
don't
have
control
over
any
other
asset
or
on
the
exile
only
on
the
ether
reserve.
B
Cool
but
let's
chat
about
this
again
tomorrow
and
think
more
about
eath,
as
opposed
to
just
the
staple
coins
too
also
nylon
had
something
he
said
about
this
e2
also.
I
Yeah
also,
just
to
finish-
we
have
been
talking
about
for
some
time
about
using
dxe
as
a
token
for
our
holographic
consensus.
So
that's
something
that
we
are
actually
doing
now
on
rinkevi
and
when
the
export
appears
on
xi
or
an
arabic
room
or
or
whatever
or
may
need.
The
plan
is
to
use
dxe
for
holographic
consciousness
and
that.
I
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
great.
It
would
even
be
fun
yeah,
I'm
thinking
about
this
with
arbor
trump
too,
if
we
dx
vote,
but
we
need
a
dx
vote
call
or
something,
because
I'm
just
thinking
more
and
more
about
it
and
it's
kind
of
like.
B
I'm
stoked
thanks
cool
what
what.