►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-10-07] (Part 1 of 2)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
The
ongoing
governance
initiatives,
probably
nothing
that
nothing
new
to
anyone
kind
of
on
this
call
it's
kind
of
just
some
of
the
the
things
that
we've
been
working
on
in
the
last
week
or
so,
but
I
am
trying
to
update
this
from
time
to
time
and
kind
of
use
it
weekly
as
we
go
through
and
use
it
as
a
to
track
some
of
the
things.
I
think
there's
a
couple
things
in
here
that
I
highlighted
in
yellow
that
I
think
we
like
don't
really
have
any
updates
on,
and
I
don't
really.
B
And
then
next
just
wanted
to
show
that
and
then
just
kind
of
going
over
to
governor's
1.0
stuff.
I
just
noticed
that
we
were
about
passing
a
new
month,
so
I
wanted
to
check
in
on
what
we're
doing
for
the
voting
gas
refunds
for
this
month.
I
don't
know
if
there's
the
same
script,
we
run
the
same
instructions
that
we
had
done
before,
just
wondering
what
we
should
be
thinking
about
that
going
forward
or
if
nico
is
on
the
call.
D
B
D
Yeah,
there's
a
slightly
more
tricky
thing
like
I
was
doing
all
the
bot
work
for
like
a
week
and
a
half
like
an
extra
something
and
and
nico
said
he
could.
I
think
he
can
easily
pinpoint
those
types
of
transactions
and
and
refund
me
for
those
like
so
it's
gonna
be.
He
has
to
do
a
little
extra
work
and
so.
D
B
D
E
G
D
D
They're
showing
these
lists
and
there's
company
there's
entities
in
the
space
that
are
using
the
list
that
they've
that
they're,
showing
to
like
drive
points
to
the
twitter
community
and
some
of
the
lists
are
kind
of
misleading.
So
it's
it's
almost
like
arming
people
with
not
fully
correct,
like
really
limited
information,
and
then
people
are
spreading
that
and
then
it
looks
it
makes
the
whole
space
see
that
and
they
just
see
the
picture
of
the
graph
and
then
or
the
picture
of
the
table.
And
then
it's
it's
not
really
accurate.
D
A
D
Which
is
related
because
the
whole
point
of
gas
refund
could
put
our
that's
up
right
like
to
look
to
have
more
people
to
participate.
I
think
everyone
was
probably
voting
on
most
stuff,
so
that's
really
good,
like
rep
percentage
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
trying
to
make
an
effort
every
time
gas
is
cheap
to
like
vote
on
proposals
all
the
time
most
dows.
Don't
do
that,
like
once
it's
gonna
pass,
there's
no
reason
to
vote,
but
we're
trying
to
make
we're
clearly
trying
to
change
that
right.
B
Yeah
and
like
I
think
it's
been
good,
I
mean
I
don't
know
if,
like
it's
a
silly
thing
to
say,
but
like
I've
been
checking
the
proposals
looking
at
people
voting
and
it
just
kind
of
you
know,
I
think
it's
a
good
way
of
encouraging
like
governance
participation,
and
so
I
guess
it's
at
least
working
internally,
but
is
it
achieving
the
like
external
benefit
of
higher
voting
participation
and
how
that's
represented
in
different
stats?
Probably
not,
but
I
think
at
least
is
the
internal
tool.
It's
been.
B
E
E
D
Yeah,
I
I've
been
watching
snap
related
snapshot,
which
I
think
you
guys
also
talked
about
on
the
last
the
call
you
had
with
dallas
tech,
but
the
last
time
I
had
looked
at
snapshot
like
three
weeks
ago.
There
were
like
five
projects
on
there
and
when
I
opened
it
this
week
we
were
like
there
were
like
75
projects,
and
I
don't
know
what
happened
in
two
weeks,
but
it
seems
like
everyone's
using
it.
B
Gonna
vote
versus,
if
there's
just
like
one
or
two
votes
on
something
and
you're
like
well,
I
don't
know
if
this
is.
You
know
I
should
be
voting
on
that,
but
I
think,
like
the
I
think,
just
as
they
as
corker
said
like
we
should
be
thinking
of
other
ways.
I
think
we
are
to
eliminate
the
cost
of
voting,
but
I
just
think,
as
a
you
know,
I
guess
we're
not
two
months
into
the
gas
refund
for
voting.
B
I
think
it
has
been
a
good
initiative
so
far,
so
we'll
get
to
those
two
things
in
the
layer
two
and
the
x
die
stuff
in
in
a
second
next.
I
just
wanted
to
chat
about
rep
boost,
just
because
it's
kind
of
been
a
couple
weeks
since
all
of
the
initial
10
have
gone
through
and
there
have
been-
I
guess,
a
couple-
people
that
would
maybe
be
part
of
a
rep
boost
campaign
that
are
currently
in
the
queue
and
I'm
thinking
of
zoron
and
daniel.
B
But
those
were
not
like
kind
of
part
of
a
community
rep
boost
campaign.
I'm
still
working
on
kind
of
gathering
some
data
on
this
and
presenting
it.
But
I
just
how
should
we
yeah
I'm
such
a
good
one
augusto
right
there,
like
I'm
just
kind
of
thinking
about
a
couple,
different
people
that
we
should
rep
boost,
there's
actually
a
russian
guy
who
did
like
a
podcast
on
dx
dao
that
youtube
that
I
was
thinking
of
kind
of
doing
that.
B
G
I
Because,
like
with
the
first
proposal,
that's
going
through
right
now,
that's
going
to
be
my
first
like
rep
ever
earned,
and
ideally
I
I
don't
know
exactly
what
a
rep
boost
is
per
se.
That
would
be
a
nice
content
piece,
maybe
for
the
medium,
but
in
general
I
think,
like
earning
it
is
better
than
just
having
it
been
given
to
me.
B
Yeah
I
mean
well,
I
mean
typically
people
the
rep
boost
are
people
that
we
feel
have
earned
it
it's
more
of
kind
of
outside
the
like
formal
worker,
compensation
or
former
kind
of
core
contributor
angle,
and
so
it
may
be
people
that
are
doing
things
but
not
getting
compensated
for
them.
So
I
would
imagine
jordan
if
you
had
you've,
been
doing
a
lot
of
great
work.
The
last
I
guess
like
month,
or
so.
B
If
you
kind
of
waited
a
little
bit
to
and
you
weren't
asking
for
any
compensation,
then
that
would
be
well.
Okay,
let's
have
a
boost
come
in,
but
it's
clear
that
you
like
want
to
get
more
involved
in
the
community
and
kind
of
like
work
directly.
So
I'm
not
sure
if,
like
the
rep
boost
campaign,
is
best
for
that,
but
I
think,
like
the
as
augusto
says,
like
phil,
the
auditor,
that's
someone
who's
been
contributing
and
I
think,
providing
a
lot
of
great
value.
D
I
think
overall,
like
without
a
doubt
we
should
people
should
do
proposals
themselves.
Ask
for
compensation,
ask
for
rep
it's
becoming
easier
to
know
like
what
to
ask
for
it
used
to
be
like
a
lot
harder.
I
think
it's
a
lot
easier,
so
it's
easier
for
people
to
do
that.
There
are
there
in
the
in
the
reckless
program,
the
initial
batch.
D
I
B
Yeah,
I
think
we
have
the
voting
for
free
and
eliminating
voting
costs
is
something
I
think
we've
been
thinking
about,
working
on
a
lot,
it's
a
little
bit
more
complicated
because
it's
not
erc
20
based
voting.
So
that's
why
the
snapshot,
option
doesn't
kind
of
work
and
plus
there's
some
security
issues
with
snapchat,
but
I
think
lowering
voting
is
a
is
a
top
priority.
Actually,
we
have
two
other
items
on
the
agenda
that
are
kind
of
on
that.
B
B
E
With
those
rewards
but
they're
actually
like
really
cool
just
because,
like
it's
appreciated-
and
I
think
this
those
red
boos,
it's
a
clear
signal
that
we
are
like
openly
inviting
members
which
is
like
yeah.
We
can't
sit
around
and
wait
for
like
people
who
want
to
work,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
we're
like
we
should.
E
We
should
be
proactive
about
like
you
and
you're
an
important
member,
and
you
should
like
be
invited
into
governance
and
having
that
like
a
proactive
thing
is
like
a
way,
more
way,
stronger
signal
than
like
workout
proposals,
and
I
think
we
should
continue
with
that
and
like
we
should
do
that
like
monthly
or
be
monthly.
There's
also
one
omen
user
who's
contributing
a
lot.
He
like
dcc
one.
He
created
like
the
first
batch
of
ballot
markets
and
he's
cons
constantly
providing
feedback
for
for
omen.
J
Yeah
sorry,
I
want
to
give
I
want
to
give
nico
and
pepo.
They
were
helping
me
in
the
x
diet,
employment,
and
I
want
to
kind
of
like
make
a
proposal
for
like
their
contribution
for
like
a
red
boost.
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
there
should
be
like
a
pipeline
of
that
type
of
stuff.
I
think
that
anyone
who
wants
to
give
someone
else
should
you
know,
create
a
proposal
and
then
the
dow
can
agree
or
disagree
exactly.
D
G
You're
teaching
them,
can
you
guys
hear
me
yeah
we
can
yeah
yeah
okay,
but
if
we're
never
teaching
them
how
to
use
alchemy,
it's
like,
even
if
they
get
the
rep,
they
don't
know
what
to
do
with
it.
So
at
some
point
teaching
them
you
got
to
teach
them
how
to
use
alchemy.
You
might
as
well
do
it
when
they've
done
enough
to
earn
it
and
so
say,
like
hey
dude,
you
could
totally
get
voting
power
in
this
miss
dow
and
it's
cool
and
here's
how
I
make
a
proposal
yeah.
So.
D
D
H
D
A
B
B
A
D
D
B
Well,
yeah:
we
can
actually
talk.
Let's
actually
stay
on
this,
because
is,
I
know
you
were
looking
it's
like
kind
of
the
homepage
part,
and
it
probably
would
be
like.
Is
it
that
there's
a
governance
part
on
there
and
so
having
things
like
that,
would
be
yeah
a
good
place
to
aggregate
that
information.
I
I
I
mean
it's
going
to
sound,
maybe
silly,
but
a
centralized
place
where
people
can
access
data
about
dxdow
in
general
about
omen
about
mesa
about
rails,
all
in
one
place
and
medium
at
the
moment,
even
though
it's
a
central
solution
until
the
the
decentralized
solution,
I
forget
its
name
algonate
or
something
like
that.
Until
they
come
to
fruition,
we
shouldn't
sleep
on
it.
I
think
we
should
activate,
and
I
I
I'm
fully
prepared
to
take
responsibility
for
creation.
L
Yeah-
and
I
can
add
a
suggestion
for
that,
because
in
a
company
I
was
working
before
like
we
always
had
some
someone
who
is
not
taker
and
it
was
different
every
time,
and
so
he
would
listen
like
for
everything
that
was
talked
about
and
he
would
write
like
notes
and
then
he
will
like
publish
it.
So
I
think
it's
important
that
he
have
someone
who
is
responsible
and
it's
not
like
bullet
points.
L
H
A
I
M
A
M
So
this
way
that
we
can
assign
the
ownership
of
blog
that
the
exile.eth
to
this
multisignature
and
on
our
website
redirect
the
when
you
enter
to
blog
to
the
ipfs
version
of
our
blog,
that
will
be
managed
by
by
a
group
of
people
interested
in
managing
the
blog.
So
essentially
it
will
be
owning
the
ens,
an
ens
subdomain
related
with
the
blog
that
can
easily
be
updated
and
it
will
be
hosted
on
ipfs,
something
medium
alike.
M
So
I
think
we
can
assign
an
ens
sub
domain
by
with
a
proposal
to
a
multi
signature
that
will
just
handle
this
block
content
and,
let's
say,
okay.
I
I
have
this
new
article
to
be
uploaded,
someone
redeploys
the
new
blog
on
ipfs.
This
is
the
hash
you
assign
the
hatch
of
the
blog,
and
when
you
enter
to
blog
to
the
south
domain
of
the
blog,
you
will
see
the
content
updated
from
ipfs.
B
B
With
this
clone,
that's
on
x
die.
Obviously
so
there's
two
proposals
now
to
send
ten
thousand
dollars
to
it
through
a
multi-sig
and
then
three
thousand
gen
to
like
fund
the
dow
or
kind
of
help
the
have
the
doubt
operate
on
x,
die
and
then,
after
that,
there's
obviously
a
whole
bunch
of
things
we
can
do.
I
think
we
could
use
that
dollars
for
competitions
like
marketing
initiatives
and
then
also
we
could
use
that.
J
So
this
is
just
like
a
small
example
just
like
about
or
to
name
the
dxt
excel
competition
yeah
about
the
competition
competition.
Basically,
if
you
know
right
now,
we
have
a
yes
or
no
question
on
dows
like
that's
how
it
works
so
with
the
competition.
If
the
answer
is
yes
to
a
proposal,
then
it
opens
up
a
competition
where
anyone
can
propose
a
choice
and
then
like
this
is
the
first
period
then
the
second
period
anyone
could
vote
from
the
dao,
and
you
apply
your
entire
reputation
to
each
vote.
J
J
C
J
C
Yeah
totally
and
gnosis
protocol
was
actually
designed
with
prediction
markets
in
mind
to
be
like
kind
of
this
place
where
a
long
tail
of
trading
could
happen.
If
you
had
a
lot
of
outcome,
tokens
with
you
know,
maybe
low
liquidity,
so
it
might
be
cool
to
actually
see
you
know,
hands
actually
asking
if
we
should
just
copy
the
main
lists.
Well,
yeah
they're
different
addresses
right
because
they're
they're
actually
different.
J
I
mean
it
depends
like
how
did
they
employed
it?
I
think
for
for
dao
stack
like
the
gen
is
the
same
address,
but
it
depends
on
like
if
they
deployed
it
or
not,
yeah
it's
actually.
I
actually
just
used
it.
The
gen
x,
gen
bridge,
and
it
took
it
like
10
minutes
to
show
up
on
because
I
was
like
I
just
transferred
like
5000
gen.
J
No,
it
confirmed,
but
then
it
didn't
show
up
and
then
it
took
it
like
a
while.
So
I
panicked
for
a
bit
yeah
like
another
thing
we
could
do
is.
Is
I
actually
think,
like
a
lot
of
the
votes,
a
lot
of
the
proposals
that
we're
doing
that
are
not
really
related
to
the
protocols
themselves
or
trying
to
gauge
things
could
be
done
there
so
yeah?
That's
that.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
the
to
me.
There's
kind
of
like
x
die
things
right,
whether
that's
running
competitions
or
like
managing
dx
style
products
on
xdi
and
then
separate
from
that
is
like
how
can
we
use
really
just
cheap
voting
on
xdi
to
alleviate
some
some
of
that
from
the
main?
And
so
I
guess,
like
things
like
signal
proposals,
could
they
could
those
be
done
on
xdi.
D
So
so
what
the
it
becomes,
two
different
places
for
like
that
have
different
voices
and
different
amounts
of
rep,
but
like
status,
for
example,
to
make
like
this
more
of
an
official
partnership.
I
wanted
to
do
an
on-chain
proposal.
I'm
happy
to
do
that
on
xdi,
like
it's
really
a
signaling
vote,
I'll
try.
I
can
I'll
do
that
one
and
then
we'll
see
how
it
turns
out
then
goes
and
looks
like.
Oh
does.
D
B
J
D
So
I'm
I'm
guessing
that
most
people
well
not
most,
but
some
half
the
people
probably
don't
know
how
to
get
some
ex
guy
to
start
voting.
If
anyone
has
that
question,
you
can
reach
out
to
me,
or
we
could
just
like
send
a
bunch
of
x
died
to
everyone
as
well.
You
only
need
a
tiny
bit
like
a
dollar
of
x.
Die
will
get
you
thousands.
D
J
D
J
J
B
J
This
is
governed
by
us.
I
mean
we
developed
it
for
ourselves,
so
it
was
like
before
the
omni
like,
because
we've
been
working
on
xdi
since,
like
east
denver.
Basically,
so
we
had
to
create
all
the
infrastructure
for
that.
You
know,
beginning
of
the
year,
like
most
of
the
things
didn't
exist
back
then.
B
Cool,
I
want
to
move
on
to
the
five-point
plan
in
working
groups
and
figuring
out
how
to
kind
of
execute
on
the
vision
from
that.
So
just
had
a
couple
notes
to
run
through
here,
so
the
five-point
plan
was
kind
of
a
response
to
some
of
the
issues
brought
up
over
the
last
couple
of
months,
and
I
can't
lay
out
a
plan
to
kind
of
deal
with
those
going
forward.
This
passed
on
september
24th
as
a
signal
proposal
and
kind
of
at
this
point.
B
It's
like
okay,
how
does
the
community
fulfill
on
this
vision-
and
I
think
some
of
the
five
one
plan
can
be
executed
executed
through
existing
dxtile
contributors
without
outside
counsel?
I
think
like
in
all
three
of
these
things
like
point
one
budget
reporting
point
two
community
onboarding
and
point
four
product
road
maps.
B
I
think
we're
moving
toward
in
that
direction
in
general
and
I
think
that
can
probably
have
outside
counsel
and
after
outside
advice,
but
I
I
think
that
just
keep
with
the
existing
contributors
that
are
getting
funding
from
geeks
dow.
I
think
that
can
that
we
can
accomplish
that.
There
are
other
initiatives
in
the
five
point
plan
I
think,
requires
research
and
additional
resources
outside
of
the
core
contributor,
namely
the
bonding
curve
and
the
governance
2.0
mechanism.
B
These
are
really
difficult
topics
or
you
know
they
involve
a
lot
of
different
moving
parts.
Some
of
it
is
having
additional
research.
Obviously,
like
the
binding
curve
and
governance
2.0
eventually
will
it
will
be
a
huge
technical,
a
lot
of
technical
work,
so
we
need
to
kind
of
come
to
some
consensus
on
those,
but
it
requires
a
lot
of
research
debate,
discussion
back
and
forth,
so
I
think
it's
important
that
we
get
some
other
people
involved
in
this.
B
So
I
propose
or
kind
of
suggesting
that
we
set
up
a
working
group
to
research.
These
initiatives
and
report
back
to
the
style
community.
There's
been
some
discussion
of
working
groups
in
the
past,
but
just
using
trying
to
figure
out
how
we
actually
put
some
structure
onto
this.
So
you
know
is
there
funding?
Is
there
rep
compensation
like
what
is
the
accountability?
B
B
Do
we
want
someone
to
kind
of
go
work
through
that
so
yeah
kind
of
broadly
thinking
about
how
we
use
working
groups
to
push
initiatives
forward,
but
specifically
on
how
we
can
kind
of
fulfill
the
vision
on
the
five-point
plan
by
creating
a
working
group
for
the
bonding
curve
and
a
working
group
for
kind
of
governance?
And
so
the
bonding
curve,
presumably
would
include
people
like
tibbled,
delphi,
maybe
ciel,
and
then
the
governance
2.0.
B
I
think
you
know
dow
stack
having
baton
be
involved
would
be
really
great
and
then
I
think
delphi
would
also
be
helpful
there.
And
maybe
we
can
bring
in
kind
of
some
some
outside
people.
So
that's
kind
of
like
the
vague
structure
and
so
trying
to
get
some
feedback
on
on
on
that
and
and
how
to
move
forward.
J
Yeah
so
like,
I
think
this
is
great
and
I
think
I
would
like
keeps
coming
back
to
like
any
sort
of
organization
tool
to
even
see
that
to
even
see
you
know.
Okay,
we
have
a
working
group,
it's
for
the
bonding
curve
or
for
the
the
reputation,
the
voting
power
formula
and
it's
like
dowstag,
delphi,
martin,
koppelman
and
other
stuff,
so
like
like
any
sort
of
visualization
for
that
as
well.
M
G
M
What
are
what
are
the
goals
of
them?
I
mean
where,
where
is
the
action
involved,
because
here
we
are
talking
about
only
participants
externals
from
the
from
the
excel
some
of
them
they
have
rep
because
we
gave
them
a
red
boost,
but
that's
it
there
isn't
going
to
be
anyone
from
dxo
involved
in
these
working
groups.
M
J
Don't
think
that's
what
you
meant
chris,
like
the
way
I
see
it,
this
xdi
deployment.
It
was
kind
of
like
a
working
group
of
me,
nico
and
and
peppo
helping
a
bit.
So
that's
kind
of
like
you
need
to
have
a
team
of
people
like
doing
a
certain
task,
and
I
guess
one
person
responsible
for
that
team,
and
this
is
kind
of
like
a
momentary
project.
It
could
be.
J
B
So
I
guess
gusto
we're
trying
to
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
the
dx
dow
executes
on
the
proposal
that
was
passed
and
I'm
just
saying
like
we
need
to
figure
out
how
to
execute
on
that,
and
I
think
we
should,
whether
that's
like
the
existing
community
here
or
other
you
know
kind
of
people.
I
think
the
question
is
like:
how
do
we
provide
some
structure
on
executing
on
that.
B
B
M
Yeah
yeah
one
of
the
issues
will
be
how
to
materialize,
like
all
the
ideas
that
we
wanna,
that
we
wanna
execute
right.
For
example,
we
have
we
have
this
working
group
first,
we
need
to.
We
need
to
agree
on
on
which,
on
which
person
are
going
to
be
involved.
Some
of
the
some
of
the
actions
can
be
taken
on
chain,
and
some
of
them
cannot
so
I
think
most
of
them
won't
be
able
to
be
taken
on
chain
they
are.
Will
there
will
need?
M
We
will
have
to
make
someone
appoint
someone
to
take
responsibility
of
certain
of
certain
action
that
we
already
have
the
requirements
like
it
is
materialized
the
way.
Okay,
this
needs
to
happen,
and
these
are
the
requirements
and
needs
to
be,
and
this
should
be
the
final
outcome.
Someone
will
tell
responsibility
for
it
and
someone
is
going
to
be
the
one
that
is
going
to
be
the
to
blame
or
to
be
or
to
be
celebrated
for
a
success
for
a
success
of
it.
B
C
Ultimately,
it's
the
dxtowns
decision
written
has
all
the
decision
power
here.
I
think
the
main,
like
the
point
of
having
working
groups,
is
to
come
up
with
new
ideas,
and
I
think
we
have
the
opportunity
to
engage
outside
groups
to
accomplish
a
couple
of
things
right,
one.
It
can
add
more
legitimacy
to
what
we're
doing
you
know,
especially
if
some
of
the
people
working
on
it
are
like
recognized
names
and
two.
It
can.
B
Cl
is
kind
of
like
my
favorite
example
of
this,
because
he's
now
like
super
active
right,
he's
he's
got
rap
he's,
like
you
know,
active
and
all
the
different
things,
that's
kind
of,
because
we
we
engage
in
the
conversation
and
and
that
disagreed
on
some
things
I
think,
to
to
some
of
the
people.
But
how
do
we
kind
of
bring
more
people
into
that
research
and
discussion
process
because
then
they'll
stick
around.
C
But
yeah
I
mean
so
I
would
say
so.
There's
five
points
here
right.
The
two
that
need
working
groups
are
probably
the
bonding
curve
and
governance
right,
the
other
ones
which
are
product
road
maps,
community,
onboarding
and
like
budget.
I
think
those
are
already
like
in
process
already
to
some
extent
by
people
working
for
dx
now
and
probably
should
just
be
done
by
people
working
3d
excel
already.
B
Yeah
yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
yeah.
I
mean
I
guess,
like
the
bonding
curve
for
me
the
way
that
we've
been
talking
about
it.
Being
this
like
collapsing
it
and
having
it
be
like
this
capital
base,
like,
I
think
it's
a
really
cool
idea,
but
that's
just
like
there's
just
a
lot
to
think
through
on
that
and,
like
I
don't
know
how
to
think
through
that
there's
a
lot
of
technical
things,
there's
a
lot
of
also
like
finance.
M
Yes,
also
how
to
how
to
prep
how
to,
for
example,
prepare
ourselves
for
something
that
that
is
going
to
happen.
For
example,
the
warning
cure
I've
been
working
a
lot
on
the
dx
trust
repository,
because
we
are
going
to
need
a
structure
there
where,
let's
say
the
working
group,
they
decide
on
different
implementations
of
features
that
can
be
added
on
the
on
the
on
the
bonding
queue.
So
we
need
a
way
to
test
it
right.
M
We
need
a
way
to
implement
the
changes
test
it
and
see
how
it's
going
to
perform
in
the
in
the
blockchain
level.
Right
materialize
idea,
put
it
on
call
and
test
it.
So
we
also
need
to
be
ready,
technically
ready
for,
what's
going
to
happen
on
on
each
working
group,
we're
seeing
that
again,
the
depends
on
what
they
are
going
to
be
discussing.
Some
of
some
of
them
are
going
to
discuss
very
technical
stuff
like
the
bonding
cure
and
another
of
them.
F
C
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good
point.
Like
I
mean
in
some
sense,
everything
we're
doing
is
is
pretty
public
and
transparent,
but
I
think
we
could
do
a
lot
more
to
make
it
clear
who's.
Doing
what
and
you
know,
even
just
in
terms
of
worker
proposals
like
what
are
the
active
worker
proposals
like
who
has
what
responsibilities
according
to
those
but
but
also
with
these
other
points
that
are
more
internal.
J
B
The
org
chart
so,
but
we're
like
kind
of
how
do
I,
I
guess
I
one
of
the
bringing
this
discussion
now
is
like
how
do
we
move
from
discussion
about
working
groups
to
reality?
And
so
I
think,
is
this,
like
a
proposal
that
we
have
is
this,
like
we
start
with,
like
a
doubt,
you
know
talk
forum
trying
to
recruit
people.
Do
you
think
this
is
something
that
we
should
go
out
and
say
that
we
want
to
fund
these
people?
Do
we
you
know
trying
to
because
is
it
like?
B
I
agree
with
the
gusto.
The
creation
of
a
working
group
is
like
it's
almost
like
the
famous
famous
last
words
or
something,
or
is
this
kind
of
some
unaccountable
group,
and
I
don't
think
it
will
be,
but
I
just
I
want
us
to
be
mindful
of
how
we
like
go
about
creating
this,
and
so
it
kind
of
fits
in
with
all
of
these
concerns.
C
J
J
Like
is
the
gusto
still
here,
because
I
think
it
goes
to
the
main
guy
to
kind
of
I
guess
convince,
but
the
way
I
see
it,
it's
there's
one
one
person
who's
accountable
for
that
working
group,
and
you
know
maybe
there's
three
or
four
people
that
are
part
of
that
working
group
and
then
it's
it's
still
open
like
anyone
could
join
and
view
and,
like
I
guess,
you
know,
participate
in
the
meetings.
But
you
know
these
are
like
the
four
people
who
are
basically
responsible
with
one
person
who's
accountable.