►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2020-12-09]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
the
governance
discussion
for
december
9th
2020
for
dx
dau,
so
just
to
go
over
the
agenda
briefly,
on
the
governance
1.0
front,
going
over
some
of
the
funding
and
proposal
round
proposals
in
the
queue
and
then
there's
also
a
couple
ens
public
resolver
proposals
and
then
touching
on
swapper
kind
of
the
governance
side
of
things
and
what
to
expect
there
in
terms
of
proposals
going
forward
and
then
talk
briefly
about
paul
mcinerney's
worker
proposal.
A
Some
of
the
feedback,
I
think,
it'd
be
good
to
have
some
of
the
feedback
on
the
scope.
Given
that
the
pulpal,
the
worker
proposal
focuses
on
some
governance
things
and
then
maybe
a
little
repeat
of
monday.
But
if
we
wanted
to
touch
on
onboarding,
I
think
keenan
had
some
good
thoughts
there
and
then
on
the
one
point
x
stuff.
I
know
there's
been
some,
I
think,
there's
one
proposal
now
in
the
x
idx
dow
for
community
competition
for
omen
market.
A
A
Cool
and
so
just
starting
on
the
worker
proposals
just
to
kind
of
give
an
idea
of.
What's
out
there,
there's
several
different
worker
proposals.
I
know
one
from
ingomar,
that's
on
september
and
october
compensation
and
then
some
from
federico,
cayden
and
a
bunch
of
others.
A
There
are
two
separate
swapper,
relayer
audits,
and
so
this
is
the
relayer
that
will
allow
deke
style
to
provide
liquidity
to
swapper,
and
so
this
has
been
audited,
I
think
already
and
so
there's
a
the
first
fee
proposal
is
about
to
expire
today
and
then
the
second
one
was
just
kind
of
submitted
and
boosted
and
will
go
through
six
days
and
then
there's
also
a
gnosis
protocol,
relayer
audit
payment
that
actually
just
got
put
in
there
and
so
again,
that's
for
geeks
out
to
be
able
to
interact
with
nosis
protocol
and
be
able
to
like
sell,
sell
tokens
or
something-
and
so
that's
been
nico,
had
been
working
on
that.
A
So
that's
now
ready,
I
think
it's
being
audited
now
and
so
there's
a
proposal
there
and
then
yeah,
and
then
there
were
kind
of
two
proposals,
one
for
omen,
one
for
rails
that
are
just
kind
of
updating
and
new
releases
that
are
are,
I
think,
just
got
boosted
today
and
we'll
kind
of
go
forward.
So
that's
kind
of
the
current
queue.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts,
comments
or
kind
of
concerns
in
any
of
the
proposals
that
are
that
are
out
right
now.
C
Regarding
the
audit
proposals,
I
would
just
add
that
we
do
talk
about
it.
A
decent
amount
on
the
dev
call
and
it's,
I
think,
pretty
well
understood
on
the
product
team.
But
it's
definitely
on
my
kind
of
to-do
list
to
do
a
better
job
of
surfacing
services
surfacing
the
existing
audits
that
have
been
delivered.
I
think,
like
the
you
know,
compiling
them
somewhere
in
the
landing
page.
What
will
be
something
that
gets
done
and,
and
also
it's
on
me
to
do
a
little
bit
better
job?
C
I
think
on
making
clear
what
the
schedule
is
coming
up.
This
is
really
just
a
function
of
me
being
a
little
bit
backlogged,
but
on
the
dev
side,
I
think
everybody
has
had
great
feedback
on
phil's
work
on
the
audience
and
he's
found
some
pretty
critical
things,
and
so
I
think
everybody
should
be
pretty
happy
with
the
work
that
he's
been
doing
and
I
think
it's
top-notch
and
at
a
relatively
like
a
competitive
price,
especially
if
you
look
at
comparison
to
some
of
the
more
brand
names
things.
C
It's
it's
much
more
affordable,
but
I
think
you're
getting
as
good
a
quality
there
compared
to
like
an
open,
zeppelin
or
sigma
prime.
So
yeah
look
look
for
more
on
that
soon.
A
Yeah
and
I
think
that's
a
kind
of
a
good
example-
maybe
we
haven't
it
hasn't
gotten
as
much
credit
as
it
as
it
has.
But
I
mean
auditing
is
a
very
competitive
market
right
now
we
have,
I
think,
a
pretty
good
relationship
with,
as
you
said,
top-notch
auditor,
and
I
think
I
would
say
at
least
the
governance
process
has
worked
a
bit
in
being
able
to
kind
of
maintain
that
relationship
over
the
last
couple
months.
A
As
he
audits,
I
know,
swapper
and
I
think
he's
done
some
governance
stuff
too,
and
knows
his
protocol
this
one
there.
So
it's
really,
I
think,
helpful,
to
have
an
auditor
that
has
a
lot
of
familiarity
with
the
contracts
that
are
there
and
so
just
kind
of
as
a
meta
point
it
is,
you
know,
phil
has
worked
as
a
contractor
with
geeks
out,
for
you
know
as
long
or
longer
than
some
of
the
full-time
workers.
A
So
I
think
there
are
other
types
of
ways
that
people
can
contribute
positively
to
geeks,
dow
without
kind
of
being
as
engrossed
in
the
the
day-to-day,
and
so
I
think
we
should
be
open
to
those
more.
But
I
think
the
auditing
is
something
that
we're
really
fortunate
to
have.
I
think,
over
the
coming
months,
because
I
know
that
that's
kind
of
the
a
big
hold
up
for
most
projects
now.
C
B
What's
interesting
is
that's
another
we've
had
a
couple
examples
of
dx
dao
hiring
really
like
a
third
party
service
right,
but
what
you
realize
is,
and
that's
something
that
could
get
that
can
grow
right,
like
dx
dow
can
hire
people
to
do
anything
in
the
world
really
like
whatever
it
is,
but
without
in
the
audit
case,
without
jon
being
like
this
really
important
in
between
between
the
dow
and
the
external
party,
it
wouldn't
have
gotten
done
right
and
then
in
like
with
higher
bloc.
B
The
dow
has
higher
block
rocket
do
something,
but
in
those
cases
there
was
little
interest
of
the
of
that
third
party
to
like
get
involved
on
their
own
now,
they're
quite
they're,
quite
interested
in.
What's
going
on,
but
they're
not
like.
I
want
to
work
for
the
dow.
I
want
to
do
a
project.
I
want
to
earn
rep
right.
They
they
have,
they
provide
a
service,
and
you
have
this
in-between
person
that
allows
that
service
to
happen.
B
A
Cool
and
then
switching
to
swapper
updates
and
so
there's
a
remember
there.
We
have
had
kind
of
a
swapper
has
been
development
for
a
while
and
there's
been
kind
of
a
separate
process
to
figure
out
how
to
kind
of
deploy
it
and
update
it.
Since
this
is
kind
of
the
first
time
that
dxdow
is
owning
and
governing
at
the
smart
contract
level.
There's
a
proposal
last
week
and
then
there
will
be
kind
of
some
more
proposals
and
john.
A
C
So
advance
the
capability
yeah.
So
there
is
the
funding
proposal
to
fund
and
authorize
the
deployer
for
the
swapper
core
contracts,
and
I
think
this
provides
a
good
opportunity
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
broadly
about
why
that
proposal
exists
and
like
what
the
you
know,
kind
of
the
idea
was
there
with
that
proposal,
and
I
actually
just
made
a
post
about
this,
which
I
linked
to
here.
C
I
talked
to
also
a
bit
about
this
on
the
developer
call
yesterday,
but
like
at
the
core
of
this,
is
you
know
how
do
daos
actually
deploy
stuff
and
own
stuff
right?
I
think,
and
I
actually
think
tx
now
is
leading
the
way
in
this
regard.
I
think
most
projects
are
kind
of
doing
it
in
a
very
traditional
sense
of
you
know,
somebody
owns
it,
they
own
a
url.
You
know
if
you
see
a
dot
finance
or
you
know
dot,
whatever
people
are
using
now,
then
that's
like
somebody
owns
that
right.
C
It's
centralized
it's
an
individual
and
a
company
or
something-
and
they
just
you
know,
do
the
deployments
themselves
and
whatever
they
have
the
authorization
through
the
company.
But
with
a
dow,
we
don't
like
want-
and
it's
just
not
really
acceptable-
to
have
an
individual
with
that
kind
of
power
over
an
asset
right
like
you're,
not
going
to
give
me
or
chris,
like
the
power
to
control,
omen
or
or
mesa
right,
like
that's
owned
by
the
tao,
and
so
the
dow
needs
to
like
come
to
consensus
with
the
control
over
these.
C
These
key
kind
of
product
assets
right.
So
so,
how
does
that
actually
work
and,
like
I
think
people
are
probably
familiar
with
these
ems
proposals
right,
so
the
the
primary
way
or
the
really
the
way
in
which
well
I'll,
say
the
primary
way
in
which
dx
now
controls
its
like
products
is
through
the
ens
domain.
C
So
if
you
take
omen
or
base
or
any
of
our
products
right
like
the
way
it
works,
is
the
dx
style
owns
an
ems
address,
like
the
actual
avatar
address,
like
the
same
one
that
controls
the
that
has
the
treasury
funds
and
everything
actually
owns
ens
addresses.
So
if
you
go
to
like
app.ems
and
you
look,
you
can
see
the
whole
list
of
addresses
owned
by
dxdao
and
then
through
proposals.
C
You
can
actually
update,
what's
called
the
content
hash
field
on
these
ems
names,
and
so
actually,
when
you
go
to
these
ipfs
gateways
or
like
the
dot
link
gateway
or
you
use
meta
mask
and
you
go
to
the
ems
address,
what
it's
doing
is
checking
that
content
hash
and
actually
resolving
to
the
the
value
of
that,
which
is
what
we
do.
Is
we
set
it
to
an
ipfs
hash?
C
So
so,
basically
you
take
the
deployment
of
the
dap
you
like
deploy
it
on
ipfs,
you
pin
it
there
and
you
get
this
hash
that
represents
and
points
to
that
deployment
that
gets
set
through
a
proposal
on
your
asset
while,
like
you,
have
a
site
now,
that's
updated
and,
and
that
is
like
how
dx
now
exercises
control
so
yeah.
That's
exactly
how
we've
deployed
everything
so
far.
C
So,
for
the
most
part
dxdot
owns
front
end
dapps,
like
omen,
is,
is
purely
adapt
front
end
that
uses
gnosis's
conditional
token
framework
mesa
is
a
front
end.
Dap
that
uses
gnosis's,
gnosis
protocol
and
rails
is
a
front
end
that
uses
loop
rings,
zk
roll
up
right,
so
these
are
all
like
interfaces
leveraging
like
existing
smart
contracts.
C
C
The
proposal
has
to
like
kind
of
pull
all
that
together,
but
there's
room
to
improve
here
because
really
like
there's
kind
of
a
a
gap
there,
if
you're
doing
everything
at
once,
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
shoot
for
or
want
shoe
for
my
view
is
approve
smart
contracts.
First
then
do
the
debt
and,
like
I
talk
about,
for
example,
with
the
bonding
curve.
C
What
happened
is
there
was
a
proposal
to
update
the
dap,
and
this
was
the
first
time
anybody
knew
that,
like
the
smart
contracts
were
deployed,
I'm
sorry
did
somebody
say
something
yeah.
Let
me
know
if
there's
anything
unclear,
but
this
is
a
little
bit
long,
but
so
that
proposal
was
the
first
time
everybody
knew
the
smart
contracts
were
deployed,
and
it
was
fundraising
right.
So
there's
like
think
of
ideas
like
there's
an
incentive
to
get
in
earlier
right.
C
So
people
saw
these
smart
contracts
in
this
proposal
to
like
deploy
it
to
tap
and
we're
like
okay.
They
can
now
actually
deposit
money
in
here,
but
the
dao
actually
hadn't
authorized
it
yet
right.
So
there's
this
like
sort
of
conundrum
as
like
a
potential
investor
in
the
dx.
Now
that
should
you
go
in
now
and
like
hope
that
this
does
pass
and
like
take
the
or
are
you
risking
that
it
doesn't
pass,
and
then
your
money's
like
lost
in
this
thing
that
wasn't
the
real
thing.
C
So
we
can
improve
on
this
by
actually
doing
the
smart
contracts
first,
and
so
that's
exactly
what
this
deployer
proposal
was
about.
It
was
about
authorizing
deployment
of
the
smart
contracts
for
swapper
before
the
dap
proposal
and
augusto
did
this
great
job
of
like
creating
this
deployer
contract
and
the
way
the
authorization
is
done
is
basically
the
deployer
contract
waits
to
get
ether
from
the
dao
through
a
funding
proposal,
and
then
that
changes
its
state
to
be
able
to
deploy
all
the
swapper
smart
contracts.
C
Now
there
wasn't
actually
an
issue,
though,
here
with
this
proposal
it
passed,
which
is
great
25,
I
think,
was
in
favor
for
it.
But
if
you
actually
go
to
the
proposal
and
try
to
execute
it,
it
it
fails,
and
this
was
a
big
surprise
to
everyone,
because
you
know
we
had
swapper
contracts
were
audited.
C
We
did
a
bunch
of
testing
on
rink
b,
you
know,
we've
been
simulating
things
and
the
reason
it's
actually
failing
is
because
this
deployer
contract
is
leveraging
a
fallback
payable
function,
I'm
getting
a
little
technical
here,
but
essentially
it
doesn't
have
enough
gas
to
do
what
it's
supposed
to
do,
despite
the
fact
that
it's
just
accepting
each
from
the
dow.
C
I
literally
can't
do
that
because
it
doesn't
have
enough
ether
to
pay
that
gas
due
to
like
how
salinity
works
and
this
the
fact
that
this
gas
mod
is
is
fixed,
we'll
go
actually
preparing
a
post.
That
may
probably
be
ready
today
to
kind
of
go
into
the
technical
details
of
what
happened
here.
C
C
It's
just
not
what
we
were
trying
to
do
like
we
kind
of
came
up
a
little
short
on
what
we
were
trying
to
do
here,
but
I
think
this
is
a
good
opportunity
to
kind
of
like
talk
about
it
more
and
like
refine
it
so
that
it
works
next
time
and
and
next
time
actually
get
this
sequence
going
where
it's
like
smart
contracts.
First,
then,
then,
that
if
that
makes
sense,
does
that
make
sense
that
people
have
questions
on
that
any.
A
Yeah,
it
seems
like
the
the
challenge
I
like
with
the
bonding
curve.
It's
a
good
example.
It's
like
how
can
dxtal
authorize
a
smart
contract
before
anyone
else
can
use
it
right
and
not.
You
know
not
to
bring
up
andre
right,
but
of
course
now
like
as
soon
as
andre
or
anyone
like
deploys
a
contract.
People
are
pouring
into
it,
and
so
I
think
it
would
be
like
nice
to
be
able
to
have
some
way
of
the
dow
be
able
to
like
decide
when
that
happens.
A
C
Well-
and
I
think
what's
interesting
about
this
process
as
well
is
like
dxtel
can
hire
developers
from
anywhere
in
the
world
and
they
can
deliver
software,
and
then
you
know
once
they
deliver
it.
Also
anybody
from
anywhere
any
community
member
can
make
a
proposal
to
dxnow
with
the
deployment,
so
it's
literally
open
to
the
entire
world,
and
you
know
this
could
be
anonymous.
People
doing
it
for
the
dow
or
whatever.
So
I
think
it
really
like
creates
this
decentralized
aspect-
that's
really
powerful
for
4dx
style
and
yeah.
C
A
Yeah
and
of
course,
another
angle
here
I
think,
is
radical
right
and
having
like
the
decentralized
github
that
could
also
plug
into
this
this
process
up
there.
So
I
think
this
is
cool
stuff
and
so
just
for
like
timeline.
So
the
next
thing
that
we
should
expect
is
a
proposal
to
authorize
the
dap
once
that's
kind
of
finalized
and
then
from
there
it'll
be
five
day
or
five
days
for
the
ins
resolver
scheme.
A
Before
that's
that's
done,
and
so
I
think
that's
about
the
same
timeline
as
john
said,
because
it
it
doesn't
affect
that
and
so
yeah,
hopefully,
by
next
week,
that'll
be
passed.
C
Right
exactly
like
the
good
thing
is,
it
doesn't
impact
the
swapper
timeline
because,
like
the
two
steps,
you
can
kind
of
go
back
to
the
one
step
process.
Instead,
yeah
and,
like
I
said,
we'll
have
a
post
up,
probably
today
kind
of
going
into
the
technical
details
of
that
laying
out
the
options
I
mean
the
community
could
like
decide
to
go
back
to
the
try
to
redo
it,
but
I
think
for
time
witness
sake.
A
Cool
and
then
just
kind
of
moving
on,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
had
seen
it,
but
there
was
a
work
proposal
from
pulp
mackinac
to
kind
of
help
on
some
of
these
governance
issues
we
had
put
in
the
worker
when
we
were
looking
for
workers,
one
of
the
items
was
kind
of
governance,
ambassador
and
someone,
I
think,
could
kind
of
document
these
things
a
bit
better
part
of
that
was
governance,
other
governance
systems
kind
of
interacting,
but
I
think,
as
you've
seen
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
capabilities
that
we'd
like
to
be
able
to
like
document
better,
and
this
is
something
that
I
wish
I
had
kind
of
more
time
to
do.
A
But
I
think
that
pulp
is
has
had
some
good
thoughts
on
some
of
these
and
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
yeah.
We
can
kind
of
find
something
there.
I
do
think
as
we
discussed
last
week.
There
is
some
diff
different
components,
because
this
is
synonymous,
and
so
I
think,
just
wanted
to
kind
of
bring
the
worker
proposal
out
more
in
the
open
to
see
if
anyone
had
any
kind
of
questions
on.
That
would
be.
A
The
first
thing,
and
then
the
second
thing
is:
if
you
look
at
the
proposal
scope,
there
are
some
kind
of
recommendations
for
different
areas
that
we
should
be
working
on
and
kind
of
during
to
document,
and
I
had
laid
out
a
couple
in
pulpit
laid
out
a
couple
and
I'd
laid
out
a
couple
in
response.
I'd
also
be
interested
to
see
if
anyone
had
any
like
general
ideas
on
where
we
should
be
kind
of
working
and
documenting
on
this
so
pulp.
A
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
kind
of
add
anything
and
maybe
kick
off
the
discussion
on
what
type
of
improvements
or
things
that
we
can
kind
of,
or
suggestions
from
people
that
you
may
be
looking
for,
that
we
can
kind
of
start
to
start
to
work
on.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
chris.
So
the
main
things
that
were
outlined
at
this
point
in
the
proposal
were
more
research
based
information
regarding
voting
trends,
something
that
we
had
looked
at
a
bit
but
want
to
look
at.
Maybe
a
bit
more,
but
work
on
is
definitely
prioritization
of
proposals
and
trying
to
streamline
things
that
need
to
be
voted
on
chain,
but
maybe
are
not
huge,
controversial
or
huge
strategic
issues
that
we
want
to
really
get
full
opinions
from
from
the
community.
D
I
mean
everything
is
an
opinion
from
the
community,
but
really
try
to
get
full
voter
engagement
or
maybe,
as
I
think
nylon's
mentioned
a
few
times-
work
on
getting
more
signaling
off
chain,
so
that
when
proposals
are
passed
with
lower
voter
engagement
on
chain,
we
have
some
direct
correlation
there
to
show
what
the
community
consensus
was.
D
Regarding
those
issues,
that's
something
that
I
know
chris
has
mentioned
to
us
and
something
we'd
definitely
like
to
work
on
another,
and
I
list
or
we
list
a
whole,
quite
a
few
areas
of
interest
regarding
kind
of
research
and
yeah.
Please,
you
know
feel
free
to
take
a
look
at
those,
but
just
common
things
that
are
brought
up
during
our
discussions
here
during
the
governance
call
and
on
the
forums
another
one.
D
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
streamlining
and
internal
communication
is
the
main
goal
just
to
make
workers
and
the
community
understand
what
what's
going
on
as
far
as
expectations
with
governance,
and
you
know
where
to
find
governance
related
questions
and
to
clarify
those
questions,
just
an
example
of
something:
that's
not
so
research
based
that
something
that
we
definitely
want
to
update
and
maybe
work
with
keenan
on.
I
know,
he's
been
working
on
some
onboarding
and
worker
proposal.
D
D
How
much
is
that?
What's
the
community
think
about
that?
That's
a
very
small
example,
but
just
all
those
points
of
ambiguity
that
would
make
it
easier
for
everyone
just
to
have
some
clarity
on
and
aside
from
that,
definitely
continue
to
update
on
research
regarding
what
other
dows
are
doing
and
work
on
the
flat
governance
structure
that
decentralization
the
dow
wants
to
promote,
but
yeah
really
interested
in
suggestions
and
feedback
on
the
proposal.
E
D
No,
I'm
sorry,
we
we're
co-owners
of
a
business
based
in
europe.
So
that's
why
we
are
splitting
the
position
50
50,
because
we
felt
that
that
would
make
the
most
sense,
based
on
our
particular
areas
of
experience,
to
kind
of,
as
we've
been
doing,
collaborate
on
the
work
and
that
that
would
be
the
the
fairest
way
going
forward
to
you
know
allocate
time
to
the
position,
so
each
of
us
would
be
putting
20
20
hours
a
week.
D
We
all
we
work
from
home
now,
so
it
would
just
be
a
continuous
process
of
working
from
home.
Okay,
previously
I
I'm
still
a
licensed
attorney
in
the
united
states.
I
live
in
europe.
Now
in
my
business
I
had
a
more
than
full-time
job
in
the
united
states,
which
is
you
know
where
all
my
experience
was
garnered
from
and
my
partner
is
trades
with
with
capital,
mainly
crypto.
D
Maker,
I
think,
is
really
interesting.
Obviously,
what's
going
on
with
genosis
and
the
future
arche,
I
think
is
very,
very
interesting,
and
otherwise
I
think
it's
just
going
to
be
more
research,
not
just
regarding
dowse,
but
also
regarding
other
forms
of
governance
systems
that
can
be
pulled
from
yeah.
E
D
E
I'm
just
specifically
interested
like
in
anything
that
we
could
publish,
and
that
would
maybe
provide
like
a
little
bit
of
visibility
for
the
excel.
D
Well,
that
would
be
something
we'd
be
very
interested
in
working
on
with
the
whole
community
and
definitely
very
comfortable
with
pulling
from
academic
scholarship
to
support
anything.
We
want
to
talk
about
as
a
case
study.
We
can
even
pull
from
our
own
statistics,
but
that's
really
up
to.
I
think
that
would
be
in
my
experience,
aside
from
all
of
the
kind
of
hr
quote,
unquote
tasks
that
we
need
to
accomplish.
D
That
would
be
something
that
we
would
do
over
a
six-month
period,
and
that
would
be
with
some
focus,
so
it
wouldn't
be
an
immediate
thing
and
then
you
know
from
there.
You
can
actually
there's
a
lot
of
different
ways.
You
can,
you
know,
publish
it
be
a
medium,
but
we
could
also
shop
it
around
to
journals
in
the
united
states
actually
worked
for
a
law
journal.
A
Just
thinking
on
that,
because
I
have
been
thinking
after
gov
2.0
that
that
will
kind
of
be
a
way
for
us
to
push
forward
another
narrative
and
kind
of
explain,
geek
styles
governance.
I
think
that'll
be
an
opportunity
with
that,
and
I
think
this
would
kind
of
be
separate
and
more
like
a
research.
You
know
kind
of.
I
don't
really
know
exactly
what
more
like
a
research
overview
and
maybe
even
like
intended
for
yeah.
It's
just
like
a
non,
maybe
a
non-crypto
audience,
but
I
do
think
that
type
of
material
would
be
good.
A
Having
said
that,
that's
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
you
can
do
that,
do
that
in
in
one
month
and
kind
of
doing
that,
I
do
think
there's
like
a
natural
way
where
we
evolve
things
that
we've
built
on,
and
I
think,
like
the
the
worker
compensation
guidelines
that
you
said
were
kind
of
a
great
example
of
this
and
how
we
kind
of
at
the
beginning,
put
down
the
bare
bones
like
what
can
we
kind
of
all
agree
on,
and
then
we
have
a
couple
months
of
doing
that
and
then
it's
like.
A
Okay,
where
are
we
at
now?
How
can
we
kind
of
improve
on
that?
So
I
think
that's
like
a
natural
thing
that
we
should
try
to
do
and
I
think
that's
a
yeah.
I
think
that's
a
good
area.
A
I
do
think
it's
a
little,
I
think
as
kind
of
christopher,
and
I
are
both
thinking-
we're
kind
of
thinking
a
lot
like
long
term
like
oh,
we
could
do
this,
we
could
kind
of
do
that,
and
so
I
do
think
it
is
a
little
tricky
to
figure
out
what
are
the
short-term
things
to
kind
of
work
on.
I
think
one
of
the
ones
that
I
do
like
that
we've
kind
of
talked
about
that
may
be
something
substantive
is
working
on
some
type
of
specific
proposal,
strategic
proposal.
A
That
is
intended
to
be
that,
like
engagement
with
the
community-
and
so
I
don't
know
if
that's
unlike
products,
product
strategy
or
something,
but
maybe
like
a
first
example
of
how
we
can
try
to
like
delineate
proposals
from
the
community,
I
also
think
it's
like
actually
important
that
we
need
to
come
up
with,
like
a
name
for
like
what
this
type
of
strategic
proposal
is.
But
maybe
that's
something
that
could
be
done
or
accomplish
like
in
in
in
a
shorter
time
frame.
D
Yes,
I
think
that
would
be
something
that
we
could
kind
of
brainstorm
on
and
then
bring
suggestions
to
the
community
also
circulating
some
sort
of
public
document
to
get
feedback
on
whoever
wants
to
participate
and
then
post
it
to
the
forum
and
just
really
just
trying
to
create
more
clear
timelines.
D
Maybe
with
this
kind
of
thing
like,
for
example,
something
like
this
could
be,
you
know
we
could
post
something
once
we
start
a
week
from
that
point-
and
you
know
talk
about
the
next
meeting,
so
we
can
kind
of
move
a
little
quicker
if
people
want
to
do
it.
That
way,
you
know
so
it's
like
we
have
everyone
can
make
their
comments.
Then
we
can
kind
of
come
to
a
consensus
at
the
next
meeting
seem
like
that.
D
I
I
think
it
was
mentioned
well
we're
we're
both
sitting
here,
but
we're
dxd
holders
and
rep
holders,
so
we've
known
about
it
since,
since
its
start
and
crypto
investors
so
we're
just
aware
of
the
community,
the
community
d5
community
as
a
whole.
C
C
Yeah
and
I
think
it's
pretty
cool-
I
think
there's
like
a
few
opportunities
here,
like
one
like
holding
d
style,
accountable
to
becoming
more
decentralized
and
continuing
to
like
lead
in
governance.
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
of
like
a
pr
angle
to
that
as
well
and
then,
and
also
kind
of
like
yeah
keeping
dx
now
informed
on,
like
what
is
the
state
of
the
art
what's
going
on
in
in
the
world,
and
I
know
chris
does
a
great
job
of
a
lot
of
this
stuff,
but
you
could
probably
use
some
help
so.
D
He
definitely
does,
and
I
do
think
it
could
be
more
for
fun,
but
I'm
I'm
we're
hoping,
maybe
even
just
I'm,
to
start
kind
of
cataloging
some
of
these
articles
that
people
keep
throwing
up
on
key
base,
as
maybe
a
resource
for
people
when
they're
coming
up
to
interesting
topics.
Just
to
build
off
of
that,
and
then
add
things
we
come
up
with
and
maybe
figure
out
some
ways
to.
Like
summarize
things
as
interesting,
you
know
pertinent
topics
come
up.
That
would
be
unique
and
helpful
to
our
governance
structures.
B
We
we've
talked
about
like
the
dx
dow,
if
you
combine
everything
in
key
base
in
the
forum
and
these
discussions,
it's
producing
a
shitload
of
content
right,
which
is
awesome
content.
B
A
lot
of
it
is
governance
and,
and
just
sharing
and
publishing
more
of
that
governance
content
into
the
space
dxdao
will
just
stand
out
as
the
leader
in
it.
It
already
is,
but
like
no
one
knows
right,
so
just
organizing
that
push
of
content,
whether
it's
gathering
or
collating
or
whatever
it
like
that,
will
help
dx
thousand
image
a
lot.
I
think.
B
D
A
My
favorite
example
of
this
so
far
is
kind
of
gnosis
right,
no
sister
and
someone
that
someone,
without
any
knowledge
like
applied
to
work
for
gnosis
and
use
dow's
worker
compensation
guidelines,
and
that
was
only
because,
like
we
have
that
documentation
out
there
and
we're
talking
about
it,
so
I
mean
yeah.
A
I
think
this
is
something
we
could
do
a
lot
and
even
returning
to
the
previous
conversation
about
dows
deploying
contracts
like
the
same
thing
there
I
could
see
how
other
dials
are
kind
of
copying
that,
but
it
does
all
come
down
to
like
documentation
for
that
so
and
so
for
the
record,
it
is
machina
right.
I
remember
that
movie.
D
D
D
Works
but
yeah
if
things
come
up
key
base
or
a
quick
email
or,
however,
people
are
communicating
with
each
other
aside
from
key
base
and
telegram
with
ideas.
Please
send
them
our
way
and
we're
it's.
It
sounds
like
it
should
be
fun.
A
Cool
next
keenan
I
was
hoping
just
because
we
talked
about
onboarding
a
lot,
and
I
know
that
we
talked
about
this
on
monday,
but
I
just
kind
of
I
thought
you
had
some
interesting
comments
on
monday
turn.
The
biz
dev
call
about
the
onboarding
process,
and
I
think
this
is
kind
of
related
to
some
of
the
things
we're
doing
there.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
can
kind
of
briefly
kind
of
talk
about
how
your
onboarding
experience
has
gone
so
far,
and
what
you're
kind
of
planning
to
do.
A
G
Yeah,
I
am,
I
just
ask
that
you
bear
with
me.
I
think
my
my
heater
might
have
kicked
the
bed
overnight.
I
am
absolutely
freezing
right
now,
but
I'll
do
my
best
so
yeah
I
had
a
bit
of
peace
on
monday
discussing
a
bit
of
the
process
I
went
through
as
chris
mentioned.
Would
anyone
like
me
to
highlight
the
problems
again?
I
I
do
recognize
a
lot
of
the
faces
here.
D
G
Yeah
yeah
sure
I
do
have
a
couple
of
bullet
points
regarding
the
issues
I
I
figured
that
were
most
pressing
with
the
with
the
onboarding,
so
the
first
one,
unless
communicated
by
a
community
member
figuring
out
the
next
step,
can
be
needlessly
difficult
and
as
a
quick
aside
to
this
for
you
pulp,
there
is
a
document
that
I
will
link
here
that
exists
that
I
do
think
actually
solves.
Quite
a
few
of
the
main
issues
I'll
be
bringing
up
the
main
problem.
G
Is
we
don't
really
have
a
location
where
this
is
accessible
in
my
eyes
and
actually
a
lot
of
the
points
that
I
did
make
initially.
I
was
unaware
of
this
document,
and
so
I
kind
of
had
to
rehash
and
re-strategize
based
on
that
document,
but
that
document
john.
G
That
document,
I
think,
touches
on
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
the
issues
I'm
gonna
bring
up.
The
second
one
is
potential
workers,
don't
have
reasonable
means
to
identify
diegstow's
current
needs
again.
That
document
does
solve
it
and,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
write-up,
I'm
writing.
G
Currently,
the
only
place
to
find
this
document
is
twitter
when
it
is
refreshed.
A
couple
times,
and
if
you
google,
you
know
dxdot
worker
opportunities
that
comes
up
so
more
on
that
in
a
minute,
newly
onboarded
community
members
could
be
missing.
G
Vital
information
regarding
internal
communication,
mizet
and
skye
have
been
touching
on
this
a
bit,
and
I
will
go
into
the
solution
in
a
moment,
but
regarding
internal
communication,
we
don't
really
have
an
avenue
to
know
exactly
who's
doing
what
and
where
it's
kind
of
a
learning
curve,
I
suppose
so
trial
workers
or
newer
workers
or
even
part-time
workers,
may
not
have
enough
experience
to
know
who
is
doing
what,
where,
when?
How
why
you
know
and
knowing
when
people
are
available
is
also
incredibly
important.
G
Workers
on
a
trial
period
may
not
have
sufficient
information
regarding
what
is
exactly
expected
of
them
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge
as
a
trial
worker.
I
don't
think
there
is
really
a
guideline
for
what
should
be
expected
kind
of
just
follow
your
proposal,
I
suppose,
but
documenting
and
laying
out
what
that
looks
like
could
be
really
helpful,
because
sometimes
even
I'm
questioning
exactly
you
know,
is
there
going
to
be
a
performance
review.
G
We
do
have
when
you
first,
when
you
first
on
board
you
kind
of
meet
up
with
some
relevant
community
members.
Could
we
have
something
related
to
that
just
to
check
up
on
our
newer
workers,
especially
in
the
non-technical
fields,
where
there
isn't
a
github
or
anything
to
you,
know
actively
see
what
they're
working
on
potential
workers
don't
have
solidified
guidelines
to
follow
concerning
proposals,
and
this
extends
to
current
workers.
I
think
we
just
were
talking
about
that.
Just
having
a
layout
to
follow
regarding
the
proposals
would
be
really
helpful.
G
It
would
help
with
governance.
A
lot
too,
I
believe,
having
a
format
and
see.
Oh,
this
is
where
this
is
what
they
have
done.
This
is
who
their
reference
is.
This
is
what
they
will
be
doing
just
in
a
line
you'll,
you
know
cut
down
the
the
time
it
takes
to
read
these
proposed
proposals
and,
in
fact,
check
them.
I
think
considerably
and
finally,
just
the
little
pieces
trial
workers
may
have
difficulty
with
dxd
compensation
contracts
depending
on
their
field
of
expertise.
G
Sky
does
have
a
document
for
this,
but
I
couldn't
really
find
it
anywhere,
which
kind
of
lays
back
to
my
first
point
is
just
a
congregation
of
information,
so
what
I
am
going
to
be
proposing
and
I'd
like
to
discuss
a
couple
of
these
points
a
little
bit
if
possible,
is
having
a
worker
information
dashboard,
and
there
was
a
bit
of
a
confusion
with,
I
believe,
a
couple
of
uset
regarding
what
exactly
this
would
look
like.
G
I'm
not
looking
for
to
make
this
dashboard
where
the
information
will
be
stored,
but
rather
the
avenue
where
we
can
access
the
information.
Zed
has
been
big
on
the
central
source
of
truth,
having,
I
believe,
gitbook
and
a
couple
other
places
to
keep
all
of
our
information
and
have
it
solid.
In
the
background,
I
don't
want
that
information.
You
know,
rehashed
and
becoming
outdated
on
the
front
page.
G
I
just
want
there
to
be
an
avenue
to
be
able
to
find
these
things
because,
right
now,
it's
just
like
you
have
to
jump
through
hoops
and
it's
just
needlessly
difficult
and
just
quickly.
I
will
post
the
current
if
I
can
find
it.
The
current
updated
front
page
a
good
place
that
we
could
keep.
It
is
under
the
learn
category.
G
That's
been
added,
literally
just
replacing
worker
compensation
with
even
just
workers
and
congregating
all
that
information
there,
because
we
kind
of
are
already
trying
to
do
this
by
putting
the
worker
compensation
here
so
replacing
it
with
just
a
category
specifically
for
workers
and
then
having
links
to
all
that
information
in
one
place
would
be
beneficial.
G
Additionally,
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
clarity,
pass-through
or
creation
of
worker
documents.
As
I
mentioned,
the
compensation
guidelines
need
to
touch
creation
of
the
proposal
guidelines
and
what
that
should
look
like
and
the
ds
dxd
vesting
contract.
You
know
tutorial.
I
suppose
they
should
be
worked
on
made
a
little
bit
more
clean
and
put
somewhere
accessible,
as
I
mentioned
on
the
front
page.
G
You
know
we
can
have
all
of
the
information
and
everything
in
just
in
one
place,
I
suppose,
is
what
I'm
getting
at,
and
what
I'm
looking
for
right
now
for
some
discussion
is,
I
think
the
conversation
that
me
sky
and
zet
had
was
very
important
regarding
the
air
table
and
how
private
or
public
we
want
to
make
it,
because
it
will
have
our
information.
G
C
Sounds
good
yeah,
it's
great
to
hear
this,
like
somebody
actually
focusing
on
this,
because
you
know
it's
it's
like
something
that
at
least-
and
I
I
feel
all
the
time
like
that.
We're
not
doing
these
things,
but
just
like
is
not
something
that
I've
like
yeah.
It's
just
it's
great
to
hear
somebody
actually
focusing
on
it.
A
I
guess
to
the
specific
question
of
kind
of
how
do
we
have
quote
unquote
internal
documentation,
and
I
think
this
is
like
a
just
a
tough
problem.
I
guess
I
always
like.
Maybe
it's
just
me,
but
I'm
kind
of
assuming
that
everything
I
do
is
out
in
the
open
when
I
kind
of
get
on
these
calls
and
I'm
doing
things
that
kind
of
assume
it's
out
in
the
open.
A
So
that's
kind
of
the
way
that
I'm
like
operating
is,
if
like,
and
so
I
don't
know
how
we
provide
or
kind
of
figure
out
how
to
yeah
kind
of
gather
information
but
keep
people
protected
and
and
different.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
tough
problem.
B
So
one
example
would
be:
there
is
the
beginnings
of
a
potential
partnership
between
gnosis,
slash,
gnosis,
dao
and
dx
dao
right.
There
are
some
points
that
everyone
agree.
Both
sides
agree
on
and
there
are
other
points
that
will
be
contentious
like
and
will
be
negotiable
right.
B
If
that,
if
everything
is
like
fully
out
in
the
open
like
right
all
the
details
of
those
discussions
and
those
negotiations
will
matter
so
we
can
try
to
do
it
fully
on
the
open,
but
that's
typically
not
how
you
know
business
deals
get
done,
and
so
that's
like
an
example
of
like
how
public
should
that
internal
discussion
before
before
speaking
to
the
external
party.
How
should
that
work.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
the
analogy
here
is
actually
closer
to
diplomacy,
rather
than
like
business
deals
right
so
like.
If
the
us
is
like
going
in
and
kind
of
like
negotiating
a
treaty
with
someone
like
you
will
have
a
team
of
people
that
are
going
to
negotiate
and
oftentimes.
Those
negotiations
really
will
be
secret
right
or
that's
actually
a
big
contention.
A
So
I
don't
know
where
we
kind
of
make
those
distinctions,
but
to
me
it's
very
much:
okay
for
individuals
in
dxdow
contributors
in
dick
style
to
have
engaged
in
conversations
that
are
like
private
and
then
select
and
then
kind
of
decide
how
to
unveil
that
or
kind
of
release
that
to
the
public.
I
just
don't
know
if
we
should
have
like
dx
dow
sanctioned,
like
private
conversations.
D
Well
right,
so
I
think
I
think
both
skye
and
powers
had
really
good
points
on
this,
because
there
is
kind
of
like
a
joint
front
that
you
go
into
and,
like
maybe
a
negotiation
setting
that
you
want
to
kind
of
say
this
is
where
everyone
stands
and
it
it's
a
little
bit
more.
It
actually
makes
it
easier
just
to
work
to
us
the
final.
Whatever
solution
it
is
as
far
as
collaborating
with
any
third
party
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
how
everyone
else
feels,
but
it
could
be
useful.
D
You
know
if
it's
more
because
there
needs
to
be
some
structure
right
as
far
as
you
know,
with
everyone's
busy
schedule
as
to
like
when
individuals
or
people
who
are
actually
negotiating
this
come
together
and
talk
about
it,
or
would
it
just
kind
of
organically
happen
that
it's
a
private
discussion
and
then
kind
of
when
it
happens?
It
happens,
and
you
know
like
how
productive
would
that
be
if
it's
not
sanctioned,
I
guess-
or
I
don't
know
that
just
the
thought
I
would
have
is
how
effective
it
could
could
play
out
that
way.
A
Yeah,
I'm
just
agreeing
with
martin
that,
like
the
gnosis,
this
whole
discussion,
it's
just
a
perfect.
You
know
manifestation
of
this.
This
problem
is
like
or
not
problem,
but
situation
like
how
do
we
kind
of
move
forward
talk
about
things
negotiate
and
so
yeah?
It's
we'll
see,
I
think,
with
with
gnosis
here.
B
C
Private
communications
between
individuals
that
are
working
with
textile-
and
I
think
you
know
sometimes
you
know-
there'll-
be
meetings
or
whatever,
because
people
feel
more
comfortable
like
talking
to
the
people
they
know
in
those
contexts.
But
ultimately
everything
comes
back
to
the
public
right,
like
any
private
meetings
are
really
just.
C
But
I
don't
know,
I
guess
it's
totally
possible
for
dixon
to
appoint
a
diplomat
or
something
and
allow
them
to
go
into
some
kind
of
closed
door
meetings
and
like
have
some,
I
don't
know
like.
I
just
don't
see
a
necessity
really
there,
but
but
I
guess
that's
possible.
A
I
may
be
talking
to
people
about
other
things
that
I'm
kind
of
talking
with
them,
maybe
privately
about,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
I'm
coming
on,
this
call
public
call
every
week
to
talk
about
certain
things
and
like
that's
public
kind
of
for
for
everyone,
and
that
like
holds
us
accountable
and
like
if
we're
going
to
negotiate
a
thing
at
the
end
of
the
day
like
rep
like
whatever
deal
it
is
like.
Rep
holders
will
ultimately
like
approve
or
not
approve,
and
so
I
I'm
less
concerned.
A
I
guess
like
for
how
the
negotiations
are
conducted,
but
more
about
ensuring
that
there's
like
times
that
people
or
orgs
like
need
to
report
to
dick
style,
whether
that
be
through
public
forums
like
this
or
like
updates.
You
know,
I
think
we're
doing
this
live
with
the
gov
2.0
group,
but
we're
providing
updates
to
the
community
and
ultimately,
I
kind
of
for
rep
holders.
A
Cool
well
just
wanted
to
kind
of
keep
moving,
as
we
don't
have
that
much
time
just
kind
of
switching
over
to
gov
one
point
x
and
like
x,
dies
so
sky.
I
think
I
posted
a
competition.
There
was
a
community
competition
for
omen
markets
there,
and
I
know
there
was
some
discussion
about,
I
think,
changing
the
time
frame
for
how
proposals
can
get
approved.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
were.
You
wanted
to
give
us
an
update
here.
B
Yeah
this
is
the
first
example
of
a
competition
we
were
trying
to
do
and
what
happened
is
there
seemed
to
be
some
urgency,
so
I
tried
to
squeeze
without
having
all
the
information
and
details
of
how
long
a
competition
proposal
takes
and
how
long
how
the
competition
actually
works,
because
we've
never
done
one.
B
I
tried
to
like
squeeze
it
into
like
set
laid
out
dates
in
like
a
reasonable
time
frame,
so
the
whole
thing
would
take
a
week
and
a
half
or
something,
and
because
of
that
you
know
the
the
the
proposal
period
to
start.
The
competition
which
I
thought
was
like
five
days,
was
really
like
more
like
one
plus
seven
days,
so
it
was
eight
days
so
like
by
the
time
the
proposal
passed.
B
The
the
period
to
enter
for
entrance
to
to
enter
or
markets
into
the
competition
had
already
passed,
so
I've
redone
it
as
a
new
as
a
second
try
with
the
dx
dao
mindset
in
place,
which
is
don't
try
to
squeeze
things
into
too
short
period
of
time
so
gave
it.
You
know
eight
nine
days
for
the
proposal
to
pass,
which
you
can
all
go
and
vote
on
this.
B
The
good
thing
is
dx
xdx
down
now
has
some
x
dye
in
it,
so
spicened
up
the
award
with
a
hundred
x
die
as
well
as
some
x,
dx
dial
rep
for
the
three
winning
markets.
So
once
this
proposal
passes
in
three
and
a
half
days,
I
think
if
it
passes
and
people
vote
on
it,
the
competition
will
start.
I
have
a
post
that
will
explain
to
the
community
the
point
of
the
competition
I
haven't
published
it
yet
and
once
this
we
know
this
is
going
to
pass.
B
We
publish
that-
and
hopefully
we
tweet
that
out
and
spread
it
into
like
the
greater
community,
and
then
we
get
all
interested
parties
to
submit
their
markets
into
this
competition,
which
will
last
five
or
six
days
of
entry,
and
then
there
will
be
a
voting
period
and
it's
timed
up
to
end
the
voting
period
to
end
just
before
christmas.
So
it's
like
going
behind.
You
can
see
the
details
dates
of
the
competition
in
this
actual
proposal.
B
If
you
click
the
go
to
competition
button,
so
this
will
be
hopefully
a
successful
competition
and
then
once
we
know
that
it
works
and
the
timing
of
how
things
for
a
competition
should
be.
We
can
do
this
in
other
cases
and
any
new
ideas
around
marketing
or
bounties
or
other
things
as
well.
We
can
do
more
competitions,
but
that's
my
main
concern
still
is
not
many
people
are
looking
at
xdx
dao
right,
so
the
more
money
someone
said,
the
more
money
it
has
in
there.
B
If
we
put
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
there,
more
people
will
look
at
it
right
and
so
the
more
action
that's
going
on
in
that
dow,
the
more
people
will
pay
attention
to
it,
in
addition
to
the
main
net
dial,
and
so
that's
that's
kind
of
a
big
hurdle
that
needs
to
be
overcome,
and
so
it
will
be
interesting
to
follow
this
competition
and
then
hopefully
expand
it
for
future
use.
Cases
too.
A
We
need
some
version
of
like
we
govern
and
prod
or
something
because
I
feel
like
what
we're
doing
here
is
we're
like
trying
out
these
new
like
systems.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
like.
Well,
we
gotta,
like
the
only
way
you
can
figure
out
what
to
do
is
by
like
actually
just
doing
it
and
governing
things.
So
I
think
that's
kind
of
what's
happening
with
xdi.
A
Is
it's
just
kind
of
been
like
a
good
iterative
process
to
figure
out
exactly
what
we
do
and
I
guess
like
just
I
was
looking
at
the
the
rep
award.
So
how
exactly
does
that
work?
Because
I
guess
that's
going
to
a
specific
address
on
xdi
and
like
how
do
you
distribute
rep
from
that
address
or
is
like
rap
on
xdi,
not
transferable,.
B
Sorry
well,
no,
the
cop,
the
the
rep
and
the
the
award
of
1500
or
sorry
300
x
x
die
goes
into,
like,
I
think,
an
escrow,
a
competition
escrow.
If
this
proposal
passes
and
then
you
have
a
percentage
dividing
between
like
a
certain
amount
of
winners,
and
so
those
are
all
entries
entry
fields
in
the
competition
scheme,
so
this
is
basically
if
this
passes
that
that
that
rep
will
well.
Actually
you
know
what
I
should
check
is:
where
did
the
rep
go
from
the
first
competition
that
passed
but
didn't
take
place?
B
I
don't
know
if
that
rep
is
sitting
in
the
escrow
or
if
that
rep
is
still
with
dx
dow.
Maybe
nylon
will
know
the
answer
to
that.
Anyway.
It
goes
into
kind
of
an
escrow
and
then
once
the
entries
happen,
and
then
the
voting
of
the
competition
happens,
the
it
should
automatically
go
according
to
the
top
three
winners
of
the
vote,
the
rep
and
the
x
die
will
automatically
go
to
those
three
wallet
addresses
that
win.
C
Since
rep
is
non-transferable,
I
suspect
it's
not
sitting
anywhere
well.
B
In
some
way,
though,
yeah
all
reps
sits
even
even
main
that
dow,
the
rep
actually
sits
in
the
dow
like.
If
you
look
at
the
dow
holdings
on
on
alchemy,
the
dow
is
sitting
in
all
rep
is
thinking
of
doubt
it's
just
a
sign
to
people.
So
this
would
be
the
same
thing
like
new
rep
is
created
and
it
sits
in
the
dao
and
it
will
be
assigned
to
the
three
winners
of
the
competition
the
x
die
will
be
transferred.
B
Well,
if
the
x
die
is
also
sitting
on
a
contract
and
assigned
to
the
addresses
as
well,
but
you
don't
have
the
option
to
transfer
the
rep
yes,
but
the
language
is
important,
because.
C
Like
I
think,
even
with
with
erc20
tokens
really,
what
that
is
is
is
your
address
in
a
hash
table
on
the
token
contract
right.
So
you
don't
like
when
you
go
to
your
wallet
like
it's,
not
in
your
wallet
right,
but
it's
useful
to
think
of
it
that
way
from
a
ui,
but
you
connect,
but
you
can
change
it.
For
example,
is
you
can
actually
transfer
them
with
rep?
You
cannot
so
I
mean
I'm
just
making
that
distinction.
B
C
B
C
F
There
it'll,
be,
I
mean
most
of
the
stuff.
We're
thinking
is
it's
because
of
how
alchemy
works.
If
we
like,
there's
no
reason
to
hide
x-type
stuff
from
like
you,
don't
need
to
be
able
to
vote
and
and
such,
but
at
least
show
them
show
the
hash
version
of
the
of
the
extire
proposals,
at
least
in
the
dashboard
together
with
other
stuff,
and
we
can
filter
them
out
or
something
I
think
like
for
us.
The
next
step
is
just
to
control
like
we're
going
to
have
governance
on
on
swapper
on
on
xdi.
F
C
F
C
F
And
it's
already
confusing,
like
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
thinks
it's
confusing.
Where
do
you
vote
is,
is
dxd
a
voting
token
like
we
already
have
like
a
education
like
we
need
to
educate
our
our
community
and
our
dxd
holders,
so
complicating
it
more
with
xdy,
mainnets
and
new
new
places
to
vote
on
and
swapper
governance
yeah,
I
think
a
governance
dashboard,
or
at
least
taking
control
of
governance.
F
A
I
mean
I'm
hoping
they
use
the
relayer
for
swapper
in
the
relay
over
gnosis
protocol,
like
I
assume
that
those
are
type
of
you
know,
infrastructure
that
they
could
use
and
also
when
we
do
that,
we
kind
of
like
you
know,
integrate
with
our
own
products
more
and
then,
if
nosis
is
using
it,
then
it's
like
well.
Another
dow
will
use
it
after
that,
because,
oh
all,
you
know
these
two
have
used
it
and
then
we're
kind
of
like
building
just
some
nice
flow
from
integrations.