►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-01-27] - Part 2 of 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
From
the
beginning,
exactly
even
if
the
goal
is
to
get
to
that,
you
know
reputational
based
governance
system
in
the
end
and
or
maybe
like
combine
them.
It's
just
like
the
way
that
omen
is
developing.
It
seems
to
be
like
more
of
like
the
the
token
led
governance,
but
it's
you
know.
I
think
it
is
yeah.
I
think
that
was
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
thinking.
B
Yeah
just
the
question
of
what
what
is
the
purpose
for
which
we
are
going
to
do
the
token,
and
I
think,
geronimo,
you
said
it
so
nicely
with
talking
about
how
you
want
to
get
the
omen
community
behind
really
directing
these
awesome
decisions
that
you
know
really
could
quickly
develop
omen,
and
I
think
that
in
order
to
do
that,
the
token
should
be
connected
to
some
sort
of
governance.
How
that's
distributed
with
the
token
you
know
can
definitely
be
considered
to
like
get
all
stakeholders
who
have
the
token
involved.
C
Do
the
do
the
omen
tokens
that
the
dx
dao
holds
account
in
governance.
D
E
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
that
there's
like
we
basically
have
like
a
blank
slate
and
we
should
like
I
don't
know.
I
think
we
can
pre
in
launching
this
initial
governance
structure
like
we
can
be
because
geeksdale
would,
you
know
own
a
large
portion
of
them
because
we
can
launch
these
in
the
beginning
like
we
can,
I
don't
know
we
can
build
whatever
system
to
account
for
like
the
short-term
considerations
there.
But
to
me
it
seems
like
that.
The
omen
token
itself
needs
to
be
involved
in
the
initial
governance
system.
F
The
weight
of
those
tokens
around
in
governance.
Right
sort
of
that
would
sort
of
short-circuit
the
whole
point
of
having
a
separate,
only
kill.
So
I
think
it
would
probably
be
important
to
have
those
not
participating.
Covenants
was.
F
Yeah,
I'm
not
saying
that,
like
treasury
tokens
should
categorically
not
have
governance
capabilities,
I'm
saying
if
dxo
holds
over
50
of
the
tokens
and
they
were
to
access
exercise
that
control
it
sort
of
defeats.
The
purpose
of
even
having
the
guild
in
the
first
place
right
right.
B
Right
yeah,
I
think-
and
I
think
that
should
be
communicated
that
that's
the
you
know
where
I
don't
know
not
locking
but
somehow
we're
you
know,
freezing
you
know:
governance
use
of
the
tokens
for
some
period
of
time.
As
the
you
know,
as
the
community
builds
around
the
tokens
and
decides
to
start
voting
with
them.
F
I
think
ultimately
dsl
has
like
is
going
to
retain
ownership
of
like
omen.ethan.
That
kind
of
thing,
so
I
mean
it
could
probably
even
just
be
like
an
understood
if
it's
communicated,
maybe
like
a
single
proposal
or
something
that
like
these,
like,
I
was
not
going
to
exercise
it's
unless
something
like
really
needs
to
be
like
certain,
like
rescued
or
something.
D
D
Would
it
be
bad
to
just
like
make
sure
we
actually
meant
100
new
rep
in
two
years,
like
let
people
lock
their
tokens
and
like
get
let
them
get
the
the
ownership
of
it?
Would
that
be
bad?
Like
I
mean
first,
the
question
is
esc
20
guild
liquid
token
governance
or
dao
stack
conservative
way,
which
kind
of
proved
itself,
but
make
sure
that
the
old,
the
old
guys
are
like
getting
getting
inflated
away
to
make
sure
that
the
newcomers
are
like,
probably
taking
over
in
the
next
two
years.
A
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
for
any
new
governance
system.
It's
all
about
distribution
right
like
where
are
who
is
being?
Who
is
going
to
have
control,
and
how
do
you
distribute
to
those?
And
so
I
guess
I
would
have
to
hear
like
what
the
governance
distribu
the
reputation
distribution
would
be
for
a
gnomon
guild,
because
I
think
that
would
kind
of
be
the
determinant
of
whether
that's
successful
item
or
that's
a
good
point.
D
Yeah,
for
now,
I
think
the
circulating
supply
will
be
just
eight
percent
txt
holders
airdrop
with
like
in
combination
with
omen,
omen
users
and
five
percent
mesa
sales,
so
this
will
be
like,
probably
for
a
longer
time,
be
the
circulating
supply
of,
but
we
need,
like
I
mean,
that's,
that's
interconnected
right
if
we
actually
going
the
the
way
with
like
hundred
percent
new
new
minted
rep
over
two
years,
I
think
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we're
actually
giving
out
a
little
bit
more
into,
like
other
buckets.
F
I
think
for
me,
it's
like
on
one
hand,
I
think
we
should
be
kind
of
proponents
of,
like
you
call
it
our
brand
around
like
non-transferable
voting
power,
on
the
other
hand
like
in
the
long
run,
we're
moving
to
governor
2.0
like
that's
kind
of
the
hill
I
would
want
to
fight
on
right
is
the
governor's
2.0
hill
and
I
would
not
want
to
repeat
some
of
the
struggles
we've
had
with
the
dhc
versus
rap
like
in
the
overkill.
D
B
I
think
there's
an
issue
of
communication
that
it
will
seem
like
they
don't
have
ownership
from
the
get-go
and
then
how
you
know.
How
does
how
does
their
participation
lead
to
the
old
guys
getting
inflated
out
over
two
years?
So
I
think
it
kind
of
needs
to
be
started
at
the
beginning,
where
you
know
it's
easy
to
obtain
ownership.
C
Also,
if
you're,
if
you're
using
the
token
as
governance
and
dx
dao's
holdings,
aren't
for
governance
gnosis
according
to
this
will
be
the
decision
maker.
By
far
of
all
omen
tokens
right.
A
If
you
do
do
token,
based
voting,
it's
just
like
it
does
kind
of
open
it
up
more
towards
uncertainty,
and
so
I
would
be
hope,
there'd
be
some
way
of
of
kind
of
having
this
be
like
a
more
guarded
launch.
D
C
G
B
It
seems
a
little
silly
why?
Why
would
you
even
do
the
token?
If
that's,
if
that's,
what
essentially
is
going
to
be
the
outcome.
G
I
mean
you're,
giving
the
token
to
people
who
use
the
omen
right
and
people
will
give
liquidity
to
them,
and
then
you
tell
them
here.
You
can
get
voting
power
in
this
omen,
dao
with
the
token
that
we
are
dropped
to
you,
if
you
believe
in
the
long
term,
you
know
in
omen
long
term.
If
you
don't,
then
you
know
you
just
sell
that
token.
That's
fine
yeah
another.
F
So
there's
like
a
question
of
who's
in
the
airdrop,
but
I
do
think,
like
the
pope's
point
like
distribution
matters,
a
lot
here
if
like
if
you
give
some
voting
power
to
all
of
the
participants,
but
they
are
dwarfed
compared
to
like
gnosis,
dow
or
even
like
geeksdale,
or
even
existing
rep
holders
like
they're,
not
gonna,
feel
empowered
right
and
they're.
Not
it's
not
gonna.
Be
that
exciting.
C
So
this
is
the
conundrum,
because
it's
the
whole
point
of
giving
dx
dow
70
of
the
tokens
is
the
revenue
part
right.
That's
like
the
that's
the
reason
you
want
it
to
flow
to
dxe
holders.
Yet
then
we're
trying
to
figure
out
governance
distribution,
that's
more
equal!
The
only
way
to
do
that
is
to
use
the
rep
and
to
give
take
the
current
dx
dial
rep
and
then
do
a
whole
another
100
of
d
of
that
amount
of
rep
and
give
it
out
to
basically
omen
users
and
omen
token
holders.
C
And
then
you
have
this
really
balanced
governance,
which
is
not
dx,
dow,
it's
it's
rep
holders
and
then
it's
new
holders
and
they're
about
equal,
including
gnosis,
and
then
it's
his
balance,
which
makes
sense.
But
you
can't
do
that
with
omen
token,
because
you're
saying
omen,
token
is
financial
token
and
and
dx
dow
needs
70
percent
of
them.
So
it's
impossible
to.
F
I
wouldn't
put
like
constraints
on
what
we
could
do
technically
I
mean
just,
for
example,
like
you
could
actually
do
exactly
what
we're
talking
about.
If
we
give
if
gnosis
down
gets
vested
tokens-
and
it's
only
unvested
tokens
that
can
vote
dx
now
just
doesn't
vote,
then
it's
just
the
people
who
buy
in
the
mesa
sale
and
get
airdropped
right.
Those
would
be
the
people
with
the
influence
from
day.
One.
F
That
that's
that
should
be
understood
from
the
beginning.
Just
because,
like
this
is
like
a
sub
system
right
like
it,
but
that
doesn't
mean
like
the
whole
idea
is
delegation
right,
like
the
exam,
is
delegating
control
of
certain
things
from
omen
to
the
omen
guild
so
like
in
your
normal.
Day-To-Day
operations
like
it
shouldn't,
be
involved
right,
but
it
does
ultimately
have
ownership
right.
G
G
That
over
the
next
12
months,
oh
I'm
gonna
call
from
the
delivery
guy
one.
E
F
But
I
mean
I
think,
just
because
the
excel
retains
ownership,
I
don't
think,
is
really
the
the
key
thing.
I
think
the
key
thing
is
people
feeling,
like
their
vote
matters
right.
So
if,
if
the
they're
voting
and
like
there's
another
big
voter
voting
and
that
happens
like
even
once
or
twice
right,
they're
gonna
be
like
well
screw
this
right,
like
I'm
insignificant.
A
Yeah,
I
feel
like
the
same
thing
applies,
though,
to
like
using
a
reputation-based
governance
system
from
the
start
too,
because,
like
then,
the
people
like
receiving
the
omen
token
are
like
well,
there's
like
I
have
to
go
through
this
other
process
or
like
there's
some
other
way
of
like
actually
getting
voting
power.
C
Yeah
the
same
amount
equal
equal
to
the
x
dow,
the
rep
holders.
G
Yeah,
let
me
maybe
finish
that
thought:
okay,
so
we
have
one
million
reps
right
now
and
then
we
say
there
is
an
option
for
over
the
next
12
months
to
distribute
another
one
million
reputation
and
essentially
inflating
by
100,
and
this
will
be
given
to
anyone
who
stakes
omen,
basically,
pro
rata
and
each
month,
what
is
it
12
divided
by
one
million?
I
don't
know
one
million
divided
by
four.
G
I
don't
know
and
that's
distributed
every
month
and
now,
if
the
dxdao
wants
to
like
get
a
lot
of
reputation,
it
cannot
just
grab
it.
It
has
to
actually
stake
it
and
then
get
its
reputation
out
of
that
auction
that
specific
month's
option.
So
it
cannot
just
like
take
over
the
dao
immediately
yeah
piper.
I
see
you.
I.
D
See
a
point
about,
like
those
those
people
will
take
over
the
the
guilds
like
they're,
already
like
400
old
guys
sitting
around
and
like
waiting
for
them
to
cut
to
get
in
it's
kind
of
not
attractive,
but
like
one
way
we
could
do.
It
is
like
making
the
100
new
distribute.
Distribution
is
actually
like
quicker,
so
they
actually
feel
like
okay.
This
is
like
a
period
where
they,
where
they
actually
can
join,
like
maybe
even
three
months
that
we
actually
like
in
three
months.
A
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
my
preference
that
I'm,
I
think,
I'm
a
little
bit
different
opinion
than
everyone
is.
I
think
it
would
be.
I
think
we're
like
not
at
the
point
yet
where
we
know
what
the
omen
guild
reputation.
Distribution
should
be.
That's
because
omen
hasn't
been
governed
at
all,
except
for
dx
dow,
and
so
there
needs
to
be
like
some
way
of
like
figuring
out
what
that
distribution
is.
A
There
are
like
reputation,
earning
items
that
are
kind
of
being
constructed,
then,
and
then,
at
the
end
of
that
like
period,
then
you
have
like
reputation
like
an
actual
reputation
based
system
that
can
be
used
for
governance.
That
is
like
based
upon
rewarding
those
that
have
actually
been
like
governing
omen.
I
just
like,
I
feel
like
we
need.
There
needs
to
be
like
some
way
of
omen
guild
being
out
in
the
wild
before
you
issue
like
the
reputation
on
it.
F
D
But
just
like
it's
very
important
for
us
like
to
get
like
a
feeling
about
is
every
I'm
asking
like
the
other
way
around.
Should
we
use
the
liquid
token
governance
model
with
esc
20
like
who
is
for
this.
A
I
am
because
I
think,
if
you're
gonna
launch
a
token
like
a
new
token,
a
new
thing
like
it
needs
to
have
some
governance
capabilities
in
the
initial
stage,
or
else
people
will
be
like
wondering.
What's
the
point
of
the
token,
I
don't.
A
F
A
A
Out
the
initial
staking
period,
like
the
initial
rep
staking
period,
was
so
important
to
like
having
a
like
real
reputational
based
governance
system
out
in
the
wild
and,
like
I
don't
know
what
omen
could
do
to
have
that
initial,
like
somehow
like
distributed
reputation
based.
So
I
would
like,
if
you're
going,
to
introduce
liquid
choke
of
voting.
A
I
just
think
it
would
be
cool
to
have
some
initial
period
of
liquid
token
voting
to
build
up
those
like
governance
capabilities
and
then
issue
rep
based
on
that
time
period.
C
So
the
summary
is
that,
because
omen
is
a
sub
product
of
dx
dao
and
then
it's
not
its
own
living
product
ecosystem
and
it
still
has,
it
can
be
fully
controlled
by
dx
dial.
Because
of
that
liquid
token
governance
is
not
a
risk
that
it
is
in
open,
true,
open
systems
with
where
the
only
thing
is,
the
liquid
token
right.
A
C
Yeah,
so
that's
the
that's
geronimo!
That's
the
safety
net.
Is
that
like
it's
okay,
to
have
liquid
governance
tokens,
which
we
think
in
general
are
not
great
but
because
dx
dow
actually
has
full
control
and
can
override
anything?
That's
done
it's
okay!
To
have
liquid
governance
tokens!
The
question
is
the
person
who
has
that
token?
Do
they
care
about
that
that
that
thing
that
is
in
place,
do
they
do
they
think
their
voice
is
not
going
to
count
because
it
can
over
always
be
overwritten
by
dick
style.
B
Well,
that's
why
we
have
to
you
know,
communicate
in
a
very
clear
way,
like
for
dx
dow,
that
you
know
this
is
like
we're.
This
is
a
security
mechanism
and
we're
you
know.
Basically,
this
is
you
know.
Fractalization
and
omen
is
still
a
part
of
dx
dao,
but
you
know
we
want
the
token
holders
to
govern
and
make
strategy
decisions
and
make
partnership
decisions
for
omen,
and
that's
that's
the
role
they
manage
the
entrepreneurial
efforts
of
omen,
but
if
there's
a
security
breach
of
some
kind,
then
yeah
it's
something
I'll.
C
Yeah,
I
I
feel
like
it's
not
just
security
breaches,
though
it's
like
contentious
votes.
So
when
there's
a
contentious
vote
and
omen,
tokens
omen
holders
vote
and
they
and
then,
and
then
it
like,
doesn't
go
the
way
that
dx
dow
wants
it
to
dx.
Dow
can
override
that
like,
and
I
know,
there's
a
social
contract
that
it
won't,
but
it
can
so.
B
That's
a
bad
bad,
bad
precedent
to
rest
on
as
like
some
sort
of
security,
because
then
it
just
creates
a
distrust
in
the
system
that,
if
a
vote
is
actually
garnering
considerable,
you
know,
debate
and
we're
not
leaving
it
up
to
the
people.
We're
telling
to
manage
omen,
how
you
know
how
do
we
know
better
than
them?
I.
A
Think
you
would
say
deliberately,
I
don't
like
we
don't
trust
those
people
to
manage
on
them
yet
because
they
haven't
done
it
yet
like
they
need
to
like
learn
how
to
do
that
and,
like
I
don't
think,
people
just
owning
tokens
or
owning
or
even
have
a
reputation
means
that
they
are
like
better
governors
of
a
system
that
are
governors
of
a
product
or
anything
like
that
is
something
that
is
like.
A
You
know
debatable
on
who
is
good
or
who
is
not,
but
I
think
we
would
be
saying,
like
the
people
that
know
the
most
feminine
are
like
the
best
now,
but
like
long
term,
we
would
want
to
hand
that
off
to
other
people,
that
last
thing
I'd
say
on
this
is
like
I
mean
compound
and
uniswap
that
are
all
doing
this
right,
like
compound,
has
like
50
of
the
tokens
or
with
the
team
and
investors,
but
they're
like
going
through
their
little
like
decentralization
theater
argument
that
they're
doing
there
and,
like
obviously
even
compound,
had
a
vote.
A
I
think
a
month
ago
that
the
team,
actually,
I
think,
wanted
to
pass.
They
wanted
to
have
a
compensation
component
of
that
because
they
thought
that
compensation
for
like
that
act
would
build
long-term
trust
in
the
compound
brand
yada,
yada
yada,
and
so
maybe
that's
an
example
of
where
you
would
want
to
like
intercede.
But,
like
I
don't
think
people
just
like
getting
tokens
means
that
they're
ready
to
fully
govern.
A
F
Delegation
is
a
good
word
and
I
think
this
transition
right,
like
you,
start
with
the
curation
elements.
Product
approvals,
maybe
like
a
bigger
step
in
the
future,
would
be
like
the
actual
budget
management
right
like
I
don't
think
it
makes
sense
to
start
in
day
one
and
for
one
thing,
because
it's
gonna
be
kind
of
complicated,
like
workers
are
kind
of
doing
multiple
things,
they're
not
dedicated
fully
to
only
gilding.
I
don't
know
if
it
makes
sense
on
day
one
to
give
to
have
the
guild
responsible
for
like
budgetary
stuff
for
the
squad.
F
D
I'm
I'm
actually
worried
about
omen
the
product.
If
we're
gonna,
do
the
liquid
token
governance,
because
it
will
require
a
quorum
which
means
like
curating,
a
market
curating
in
the
sc20
token,
for
that
specific
market
will
not
allow
like
the
liquid
token
governance.
D
F
Like
it
doesn't
control
the
treasury
right,
it
doesn't
like.
This
is
you're
talking
about
curation
right
right,
so
yeah
it
depends
what
you're
talking
about,
I
think
and
how
like
dangerous.
A
Grew
up
in
curation
right
and
it's
like,
oh,
but
that's
like
a
learning
process
right
and
then
that,
like
is
like,
oh
like
this,
is
how
we
do
things
better
and
then
you
can
kind
of
like
give
more
responsibilities
and
then,
of
course,
like
I
really
do
think
like
a
reputation.
Business
system
is
like
a
very
good
thing
to
have
precisely
for
someone
it's
like
having
this
long-term
thinking.
I
just
think
it's
like
the
distribution
of
that
is
is
can
be
hairy.
D
I
mean
they're
like
two
to
two
views
here
right,
like
from
my
point
of
view.
It's
like
I
care
about
oman
the
product
and,
if
we're-
and
you
guys
care
about
like
making
omen
tokens
successful
by
actually
giving
the
token
holders
like
true
ownership,
but,
like
the
question
is,
are
we
able
to
be
still
more
efficient
with
the
guild
like?
If,
if
you,
if,
at
the
end,
it
will
require
three
days
to
create
a
market?
The
guild
is
not
was
not
a
good
idea.
D
Right,
like
my
like
how
I
see
the
guild
on
xtine,
if
someone
is
creating
a
market
with
diagnosis,
safe
proxy
kit,
they're,
actually
creating
the
market,
creating
a
proposal
for
curation
all
in
one
like
they
don't
even
know,
they're
actually
requesting
curation,
because
it's
so
cheap
and
you
can
combine
all
those
actions
into
one
and
like
in
the.
In
the
background.
The
guild
is
like
doing
the
hard
work
similar
to
like
catnip.
They
they
there's
just
like
one
dude
who's
who's,
making.
D
Sure
the
front
end
is
like
legit
and
like
curated,
but
the
the
guild
is
like
the
background
system
who's
like
making
sure
that
the
omen
the
product
is
awesome
and
I'm
worried
that,
like
we're
getting
confused
about
like
making
the
token
successful
instead
of
thinking
about
making
omen
the
product
successful-
and
this
can
be
done
with
the
guild
web-based
holographic
consensus,
one
dude
like
it's
enough
that
one
dude
is
taking
care
of
it.
F
F
I
think
for
like
action
items
here
next
steps
like,
I
think
we
could
maybe
do
a
poll
or
something
kind
of
with
this
core
question
of
like
liquid
token
governance
or
not
like,
is
that
kind
of
like
what
or
you
know?
Maybe
it's
described
a
little
bit
differently
and
then,
I
think
also
we
can
do
a
little
bit
of
a
trade
study
on
erc20
guilds
versus
alchemy
and
like
what
that
would
look
like.
C
Yeah,
so
we
should
post
our
like
feelings
and
comments
in
that,
in
the
doubt,
talk
thread
right
like
where
am
I.
F
I'm
worried
that
this
becomes
its
own,
like
this
is
kind
of
a
single
dimension
of
that
higher
level
thing,
and
I
don't
want
to
turn
that
into
a
200
response
thread
talking
about
stuff
that
most
people
don't
really
even
care
about.
So
like
I
think,
maybe
it
could
be
another
thread
or
we
do
some
something
else.
C
Do
both
so
have
the
token,
have
rep
and
give
all
the
token
holders
the
same
amount
of
rep.
And
then
you
have
something
that's
in
between
the
two
and
you
can
see
if
that
works.
If
that
doesn't
work,
then
the
the
the
liquid
token
ones
definitely
not
going
to
work
like
you
were
like
making
a
big
jump
versus
like
halfway
there.
I
feel,
like.
D
I
I'm
skeptical
about
that
and
like
if
we
actually
want
to
just
give
true
ownership
of
like
we
could
also
do.
The
d
style
itself
is
getting
100
rep
of
the
guild
first
and
then
allow
all
the
token
holders
to
get
like
like
stake.
D
Their
tokens,
like
my
point,
was
if,
if
the
clone
the
wrap
state
clone
is
an
issue
here,
then
we
could
get
rid
of
it
by
just
allowing
the
d
star
itself
be
100
owner
first,
just
like
as
an
initial
rap
state,
and
then
all
the
other
people
can
like
stake
and
like
really
from
the
start,
be
like
one
of
the
first
true
rap
holders.
F
I
would
describe
it
as
like
without
question
that
the
excel
brand
is
reputation
based
governance
right.
We
understand
that
the
existing
system
for
dx
now
is
not
complete.
It's
a
little
bit
broken
governance.
2.0
is
like
the
north
star
right.
So
that's
where
we
want
to
go
we're
about
to
launch
our
first
guild
open
guild,
which
system
do
we
use,
and
I
think,
there's
a
but
there's
a
few
considerations
right.
It's
like
when
we
reinforce
our
brand
as
reputation
based.
F
What
is
our,
how
does
an
impact
go
to
market
for
omen
and
the
omen
token,
and
how
does
it
impact
operational
capacity
and
effectiveness
of
women
guild
so
like?
I
think
we
could
create
a
thread
about
this.
We
create
some
polls.
We
let
people
voice
their
opinion.
We
can
do
a
trade
study
on
the
technical
aspect
of
it.
F
You
can
ask
dxd
holders
to
get
a
feel
of
like
the
go
to
market
impact
right,
but
personally,
I'm
not
worried
about
it,
like
I
don't
think
going
with
liquid
token
governance
and
oh,
my
guild
would
like
destroy
our
brand
necessarily.
It
would
just
no
not.
F
D
Will
not
make
omen
better.
My
point
with
the
guild
was
to
make
omen
better
and
we
can
do
it
by
reducing
the
curation
time
drastically.
D
Living
on
x
die
like
the
guild
will
be
the
hard
working
system
in
the
background
to
boost
like
to
kill
auger,
to
make
sure
like,
like
the
gate,
needs
so
someone's
requesting
like
an
esc.
Rapper
curation
like
someone
is
creating
an
esc20
token
out
of
like
a
presidential
election.
D
They
don't
even
need
to
like
add
an
image
to
the
tokens,
because
that's
like
a
new
token
right,
the
guild
needs
to
do
to
do
the
job
like
we
need
to
kill
catnip.
We
need
to
make
sure
it
is
replacing
catnip,
so
sure
100
holographic
condenses.
F
F
Maybe
a
hologram
like,
maybe
you
could
convince
me
that
holographic
consensus
is
necessary,
but
I'm
not
convinced
right
now
that
one
is
incapable
versus
the
other
all
right.
A
We
know
some
stuff
here,
though,
like
I
don't
know,
we've
like
experimented.
This
is
like
shows
we're
like
experiencing
going
through
these
things
and
and
like
I
think,
there's
still
like
lots
of
agreement
on
like
the
end
system
of
what
we're
trying
to
build.
It's
just
always
hard
to
get
there
because
you
have
to
have
yeah.
I
think
it's
you.
I
think
it's
unique
for
each
product.
Each
governance
system
like
how
it
ends
up
balancing
all
these
things
and
yeah,
we'll
see
kind
of
how
oman
can.
F
F
D
Yeah
I
shared,
I
shared
a
document
where
I
like
tried
to
like
really
in
simple
words:
no,
like
a
lot
of
text,
describe
what
the
esc
20
guilds
are.
I
already
said:
you'll
see
twenty
year
what
the
guild
will
will
do?
D
Yes,
yes,
so
initially
the
guild
will
be
installed
on
mainnet
on
x,
die.
We
need
the
guild
on
x,
die.
It
needs
to
do
the
job
to
make
omen
great
or
next
time
the
guild
will
receive
trading
fee.
We
can
like
the
fact
that
we
are
on
x
die.
We
can
simply
use
the
safe
proxy
kit
to
like
start
with,
like
a
front
end
fee
without
actually
taking
care
of
the
am
amms.
D
We
could
do
like
this
visit
visit.
The
visibility
push.
So
if,
if
there's
like
a
market
creator
who
wants
to
get
visibility,
we
could
like
include
that
and
those
those
revenue
should
go
to
the
guilds.
Arbitration
service
is
a
no-brainer.
We
today
I
created
first
market
with
the
dx
dollar
as
an
arbitrator
on
xtine,
so
like
we,
I
think
the
geeks
down
and
the
the
guild
itself
will
provide
arbitration
services
which
are
way
cheaper
than
claros.
So
this
is
also
like
a
revenue
stream.
D
It
will
receive
fees
for
like
someone
wants
to
edit,
like
governance,
like
a
token
to
it,
to
make
like
some
experiments
with
prediction
markets.
Well,
it's.
D
And
like,
of
course,
the
gnosis
protocol
version,
two
fee
split,
like
I
think,
that's
already
like
pretty
pretty
interesting
for
the
guild
to
like
get
revenue
in,
but
what
I'm
more
important,
where
I
see
like
a
very
like
they
get
needs
to
make
sure
this
is
like
they
they
their
own
power.
D
They
need
to
do
the
best
job,
to
create
markets,
to
create
esc,
yet
to
create
all
the
token
lists
and
maintain
like
the
conditional
token
list,
with
with
like
images
and
stuff
like
that,
but
like
at
some
point,
all
this
info
hopefully
goes
also
to
to
swapper
right
the
the
work
the
guild.
The
omen
guild
is
doing
on
x.
D
Die
could
allow
us
to
like
easily
have
a
different
trading
venue
on
on
swap
on
xtra,
but
that's
like
a
longer
term
and
like
it
maintains
3d
and
s
domains
what
they
do
with
it
like
that's
up
to
them.
D
But
the
main
point
is
like
omer.eth
and
right
so
like
it's,
it's
pretty
simple,
but
like
longer
term,
the
guild
needs
to
go
to
arbitrary.
At
some
point,
it
could
also
like
start
creating
like
an
omen.
A
really
good
omen.
Dashboard
and
maintain
that
too,
we
could
also
like
start
with
a
worker
payroll.
D
We
are
already
like
trying
to
get
the
contracts
done
for
the
for
the
dsl
payroll.
So
at
some
point
we
could
actually
like
delegate
the
payroll
for
the
omen
project
completely
to
the
gills
and
like
this
is
specifically
interesting.
We
could
like
explore
nft
issuance
for
like
hardcore
omen
users
with
like
achievements
and
stuff
like
that
and
like
this
is
also
pretty
interesting.
D
The
claros
court
is
still
the
most
essential
like
them.
You
can
argue
about
that,
but
it
may
it
may
get
to
a
point
that
the
claros
court
is
a
is
a
good
decentralized
court.
The
interesting
thing
here
is
that
the
guild
itself
could
stake,
p
and
k
and
participate
in
decision
making
of
the
chord.
That's
also
like
something
pretty
interesting,
because
until
now
the
d
star
was
very
neutral
and
yeah
didn't
to
take
positions
about
how
clara
should
resolve
something
for
omen.
D
So
the
guild
could
have
influence
about
like
how
the
how
the
guild
itself
thinks
about
a
specific
market,
and
the
question
like
here
now
is:
can
the
the
esc
20
guild?
D
Do
everything
here,
but
faster
than
the
geek
style
right
now,
because
I
care
about
that.
The
guild
is
doing
quick
jobs,
good
jobs
for
the
oman.
A
Yeah
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
work
or
like
things
to
figure
out,
and
we
obviously
had
the
the
post
kind
of
just
by
the
token
before,
but
that's
really
only
part
of
it.
So
it's
it's
definitely
a
long
process.
D
F
Yeah,
of
course,
I've
heard
that
before
it's
yeah,
so
yeah,
I
think
I
don't
want
to
get
like
we've
been
on
this
call
we're
over
here.
We
can
talk
about
this
a
little
more
in
more
technical
detail.
I
think
we
should
plan
some
time
for
that,
because
is
it
really
quicker?
Are
we
really
like
more
ready
with
alchemy?
I
worry
about
the
ui
from
there's
a
lot
of
questions.
I
don't
want
to
get
into
it
now.