►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-01-27] - Part 1 of 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
january
27,
2021,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
actually
a
little
bit
less
proposals.
Now
than
the
last
couple
weeks.
We
kind
of
cleared
out
a
lot
of
those
worker
proposals,
there's
still
two
worker
proposals
in
there,
one
from
dev
violet
and
one
that's
about
to
pass.
I
think
from
sky
I
think
maybe
I
should
have
passed
and
then
there
is
additional
funding
for
omen
squad.
B
I
think
these
proposals
have
actually
just
passed,
but
they
have
not
been
executed
so
yeah
and
then
there
is
a
new
mesa
mvp
worker
proposal
from
birdie
that
has
just
been
boosted
now
and
that's
all
for,
like
the
main
funding
and
voting
power
scheme,
and
then
there
is
a
dx
style
market,
curation
badge
for
omen
markets
that
has
just
been
boosted
and
then
lastly,
there
is
the
multi-call
scheme
is
just
under
one
day
away.
B
It
looks
like
22
hours
and
45
minutes
from
passing,
so
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
comments
on
those
on
proposals
live.
C
Yeah,
I
hope
that
the
alchemy
issue
will
be
behind
us
in
around
30
minutes,
more
or
less
and
yeah.
This
is
one
we
had
kind
of
a
crisis
with
the
top
buff
and
with
the
graph.
So
we
we
are
on
it.
B
B
Been
one
we
know
of
from
kenan
and
then
I
guess
some
of
the
other
proposals,
and
so
this
is
an
issue
with
the
graph
or.
B
C
Yesterday
it
was
an
issue
with
the
graph.
Today
it
was
issue
which
both
both
our
subgroup
and
the
graph
I
can
maybe
I
will
write
a
kind
of
a
summary
of
this
event
and
what
what's
happened
and
how
we
can
mitigate
that
in
the
future
and
but
yeah.
But
I
will
do
that
after
we'll
be
after
we,
the
storm
will
pass
okay.
C
D
C
B
Yeah
and
just
you
know,
this
is
just
for
the
current
right
now.
This
is
obviously
like
a
potential
attack,
vector
specifically
if
for
like
boosted
proposals,
because
there
could
be
proposals
that
are
boosted
at
the
smart
contract
level
and
then
voted
on
at
this
smart
contract
level
without
anyone
being
aware
of
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
for
us
to
so.
C
We
have
we
have
our
own
dow
stuck
bot,
and
I
know
that
you
have
your
own
boat
in
which
one
which
we
pose
to
key
base
and
yes,
but
I
think
it's
all
good,
because
anyhow,
it's
like
it's
take
seven
or
sixteen
days.
Fourteen
days
to
to
you
know,
to
propose
to
be
to
pass
so
all
good
and
yeah,
and
I
also
want
to
say
a
word
about
the
the
multicol
proposal.
That's
going
to
be
approved
tomorrow,
right
by
tomorrow,
so
yeah.
I
think
we
spoke
about
that
last
week.
C
Last
time
we've
been
here
but
yeah
we
need
to
be
in
general.
We
need
to
be.
You
know,
alert
using
this
scheme
and
you
are
the
first
one
who's
actually
using
that
on
production
and
tomorrow
we're
going
to
have
a
session
dedicated
session
on
the
with
the
alchemy
team
and
with
the
double
strike
team.
Just
focusing
on
the
on
this
game.
C
Look
also
looking
on
the
on
the
governance
setup
of
this
scene
and
trying
to
figure
out
if
there
is
a
way
to
improve
it,
like
lowering
fruits,
improving
the
ui,
improving
and
any
any
issue
we
will
find.
So
maybe
you
guys
can
join
the
effort
as
well.
Just
you
know,
report
on
any
weird
issue
that
you
are
seeing.
E
Sounds
good
yeah
or,
let's
you
know
I've
been
thinking,
we
should
have
a
call
to
kind
of
get
people
updated.
So
there
are
a
few
scripts
that
are
run
to
monitor
proposals
right.
So
we
have
there's
a
private
one,
run
by
dow
stack,
that's
kind
of
the
og
one,
there's
the
one
in
key
base
that
nico
put
together
that
everybody
can
see
in
the
security
channel
there's
also
in
addition
to
that,
a
script
that
was
written
by
augusto
and
this
can
be
run
locally
right.
E
So
it
does
not
depend
on
on
the
graph
right.
So
I
think
it's
time
like
you
know,
we've
had
a
lot
of
people
working
on
this
stuff
and
and
discussing
it
from
early
on,
but
I
think
with
new
folks
and
stuff.
It's
time
to
kind
of
refresh
on
the
security
practices,
and
absolutely
this
is
like
should
be
on
top
of
everybody's
mind
like
bad
security,
could
make
all
of
this
kind
of
move
right.
E
B
E
This
script
so
like
locally,
you
can
run
it
on
your
machine
and
I
think
what
we
need
to
do
is
we
just
need
to
get
more
organized
about
how
we
are
like
you
know,
monitoring
these
things.
I
think
we
have
the
basic
infrastructure
in
place.
We
just
need
to
get
more
organized,
and
so
that's
why
I
think
we
should
have
a
dedicated
call
for
it.
C
Yeah
we've
got
power,
you
you
are
this
your
real
name,
paris,
what
it's
my
last
name
yeah,
I
like
it.
I
think
you
are
right.
We
can
also.
We
can
also
you
know,
look
on
the
contract
and
eat
eater
scan
and
try
to
understand.
What's
going
on,
there
does
all
the
contracts
are
verified
and
you
can
look
on
the
events.
C
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
this
does
highlight
not
just
with
alchemy
but
in
general,
like
the
vulnerability
that
front
ends
introduce
and
relying
on
certain
front
ends
because
we're
kind
of
beholden
to
them.
So
I
think
some
of
the
discussions
about
having
redundancy
front-end
redundancy
through
different
versions-
I
think,
is
a-
is
a
good
idea.
Precisely
for
these
type
of
moments,.
F
So
so
I
I
just
you:
have
the
security
channel
on
key
base,
which
I
think
you
know,
even
if
we
like
something
we
could
consider
doing,
is
maybe
reviewing
everything.
That's
on
there
like
weekly,
maybe
in
the
weekly
call
or
yeah
or
the
governance
call,
it
will
show
you
basically
all
the
open
proposals
and
what's
their
state,
so
you
can
see
if,
like
anything,
is
like
not
appearing
or
something
doesn't
look
right.
F
Yeah,
I
mean
it's
a
monitoring,
I
guess
it's
a
monitoring
tool
and
we'll
have
to
use
it
like.
We
have
to
actively
monitor
exactly.
G
Or
is
it
go
nope
it's
actually
using
the
direct
blockchain
data
and
running
its
own
node,
so
it's
actually
not
depending
on
inferior
as
well.
It's
not
using
the
craft.
E
Okay,
good,
that's
good
yeah!
I
mean,
in
addition
to
this,
goose
is
not
on
the
call
right
now,
but
his
voting
gap
does
not
use
the
graph
and
that's
actually
going
to
help
us
as
well
with
something
like
that.
So,
like
I
said
the
infrastructure
is
there,
there's
no
need
to
like
panic.
We
just
need
to
be
more
organized
and
everybody
should
take
it
seriously.
So,
like
it's
good,
everybody
should
be
a
little
scared
about
this,
because
that's
the
way
we're
gonna
maintain
security.
D
Yeah,
I
think
the
first
good
step
is
to
make
sure
that
all
the
depths
are
going
to
run
those
scripts
on
like
daily
basis,
and
then
we
like
breach
out
once
we
have
all
the
depths
knowledge
knowledgeable
about
the
scripts,
to
make
sure
that
we're
actually
like
improving
this
process
for
like
normal
for
other
people
for
other
worker
areas,
just
to
make
sure
that
they
are
like
everyone
should
be
able
to
check.
What
kind
of
proposals
are
active
right
now.
B
B
B
Okay,
any
other
thoughts
on
this
or
any
like
kind
of
the
live
proposals.
Now
I
guess
we
will
yeah,
as
this
gets
resolved,
that'll
kind
of
affect
our
voting
on
things,
but
yeah
any
thoughts
on
on
the
current
bachelor.
I
guess
the
multi-goal
scheme
is
is
going
to
presumably
pass
in
a
day.
So
if
there's
anything,
I
I
think
that's
a
another
potential
vulnerability
in
regards
to
this,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
that
we're
thinking
about
in
that.
E
Yeah
multicall
is
new
and
experimental,
but
there
are
kind
of
precautions
here,
like
there's
a
white
list
of
contracts
that
I
can
interact
with,
all
of
which
were
like
you
know,
either
audited
by
us
or
just
kind
of
general
utilities
like
the
ens
and
yeah.
In
addition
to
that,
it's
limited,
there's
like
you,
can't
send
funding
or
mint
reputation
for
multicultural.
That's
intentional
right,
like
so
it's
kind
of
isolated
where
it
was
and
we're
not
doing
anything
new
there.
E
So
so
it's
more
like
you
know,
let's
see
how
it
works,
get
used
to
it.
You
know
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
tricky
for
people
who
are
not
familiar
with.
What's
going
on
to
like
make
proposals
for
some
of
these
things
or
to
really
process
them,
so
it's
going
to
have
to
be
kind
of
like
dev
oriented
for
a
couple
of
these
things
and
it
passing
is
going
to
allow
us
to
do
a
few
things
that
are
going
to
each
kind
of
require
a
little
bit
of
effort.
E
Right,
like
first
thing,
is
pausing
the
bonding
curve.
Second
thing
is
issuing
trades
on
gnosis
protocol
relayer.
So,
like
you
know,
making
trades
from
the
treasury
from
like
east
to
stable
coins,
etc,
and
the
third
thing
is
depositing
liquidity
into
swapper
and
so
yeah.
We
I
mean
we,
we
should
get
together,
it's
not
clear
exactly
who
would
be
working
on
on
those
chris,
but
maybe
we
should
also
get
a
little
organized
on
kind
of
putting
these
things
together,
because
also
these
things
are
probably
going
to
need
to
be
done
at
a
regular
cadence.
E
You
know
it's
almost
like.
There's
like
treasury
management
itself
is
almost
like
a
department
right
like
we
have
a
lot
of
money
in
the
treasury
and-
and
it
requires
some
kind
of
care
to
actually
do
a
lot
of
this
stuff.
So
we
might
want
to
think
about
kind
of
who's
responsible
there
and
allocating
resources
for
that.
H
One
one
other
thing
that
we
haven't
been
able
to
test
on
the
multi
call
on
x
die
is
like
the
white
list
so
immediately.
We
should
like
test
whether
or
not
only
white
listed
contracts
can
use
the
multi
call
right
like
we
should
try
to
use
a
different
contract.
I
don't
even
know
if
that's
possible
but
like
we
haven't,
been
able
to
test
that
because
that
doesn't
exist
anywhere.
H
G
There's
like
a
special
feature
on
x-I,
it's
currently
non-white
listed
so
actually
on
extra.
You
can
interact
with
any
kind
of
contract.
That's
a
special
feature
on
x-style
that
is
obviously
deactivated
on
mainnet,
so
we
should
test
it
on
mainnet
once
it
has
been
activated.
Yes,
since
tomorrow.
H
B
Yeah,
it's
just
as,
as
john
said,
it's
a
wake-up
call
in
a
lot
of
ways,
and
I
think
it
you
know
shows
why
operating
slow
is
is
can
have
its
benefits,
so
we
can
kind
of
talk
about
it.
I
guess
the
two
things
I'm
hearing
is
the
takeaway
here
are.
B
We
think
we
need
to
have
like
a
sep
security
update
or
maybe
meeting
around
some
of
these
things
that
we're
doing
and
try
to
codify
them
or
organize
them
a
bit
and
then
second,
specifically,
I
think
on
the
treasury
management
aspect
of
that,
because
I
think
we
are
going
to
be.
B
You
know
using
or
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
outflow
funds
from
the
treasury
as
it
looks
to
diversify
and
as
we
provide
the
clarity
on
swapper,
even
as
we
introduce
guilds
to
the
process,
so
we're
no
longer
just
be
having
these
like
five
to
ten
eth
withdrawals
from
the
treasury
and
I
think,
figuring
out
how
we
have
some
a
better
system
on
that
is.
B
Cool
yeah,
okay,
then,
moving
on
to
the
contributor
guidelines
that
we've
been
putting
together,
there
were
two
things
that
I
wanted
to
tee
up
here.
Martin
had
provided,
I
think,
some
helpful
feedback
because
he's
kind
of
going
through
this
process
here,
and
so
I
think
one
that
we
need
to
get
some
type
of
codify.
This
in
the
contributor
guidelines,
I
think,
is
the
precise
amount
of
pricing
for
the
dxd
compensation.
B
B
I
think
that
that
is
that
the
spirit
of
that
is
to
get
at
when
the
last
fundraising
came
into
geek
style
to
make
sure
that
that's
kind
of
the
maximum
there,
although
that
could
run
into
some
problems
if
people
just
like
sent
a
little
bit
of
eath
into
the
bonding
curve
to
kind
of
raise
the
price
and
obviously,
when
we're
gonna
shut
down
the
bonding
curve
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
Here
we'll
need
to
have
some
like
system
for
calculating
that.
B
I
think
at
the
for
the
time
being,
we
should
agree
on
a
on
the
dxd
all-time
high
as
a
way
to
price
this.
So
presumably
the
all-time
high
is
getting
at
the
same
spirit
of
the
high
from
the
the
dxd
eth
price
on
the
bonding
curve,
which
I
think
was
occurring
around
the
same
time.
I
think
it
was
early
september,
so
we
could
use,
I
think,
coin
gecko
or
coin
market
cap
for
that.
B
B
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
like
just
going
forward
from
now
use
the
all-time
high
in
order
to
price
dxd
or
whether
that's
a
short-term
fix,
but
I
think
at
least
for
the
the
time
being,
we
should
use
the
dxd
all-time
high
as
a
way
to
price
that
so
any
any
thoughts
on
this,
and
I
think
we
probably
need
to
award
it
specifically
in
the
yeah
in
dollar
terms.
Again,
we
need
to
word
it
specifically
in
the
contributor
guidelines
trying
to
find.
B
I
think
it
is
in
there
already,
but
it's
I
think
we
should
just
be
like
much
more
explicit
with
like
if
the
all-time
high
using
this
source,
just
because
that
might
create
some
clarity
pulp.
I
don't
know
if
you
had.
I
Yeah,
I
know
I
updated
it
after
seeing
martin's
comments
to
reflect
that
and
just
wanted
to
confirm
that's
what
everyone
else
wanted
to
do.
Yeah
and
it
says,
as
and
I'll
put
a
link
but
to
coin
gecko.
H
E
Right,
it's
been
since,
since
basically
since
eath
broke
500,
which
was
what
in
december
or
something
like
that.
B
Yeah
because,
like
october,
would
have
even
october,
even
though
there
was
at
1.02
dxd
for
eth,
I
think
like
eath
was
still
like,
was
not
at
a
high
enough
amount
where
it
would
surpa.
The
dxd
number
would
surpass
the
dollar
terms,
so
I
think
it
would
have
only
been
yeah,
as
jean
was
saying
like
november
or
december
on
that.
B
I
think
we
should
be
consistent
here
and
and
have
kind
of
the
same
things,
but
we
need
to
like
have
specifics
on
like
the
documentation
of
like
what
each
of
those
were,
and
I
think
which
we
have
like
an
anchor
with
the
coin.
Gecko
price
all-time
high,
which
is
you
know,
central's
eight
a
little
centralized.
But
that's
like
a
reliable
thing.
Then
I
think
it
should
be
pretty
easy
for
anyone
to
like
show
how
past
proposals
were
maybe
not
as
much
dxd.
B
E
I
wouldn't
I
wouldn't
let
it
hold
up
any
worker
proposals.
Yeah
we
need
to
block
rockets
should
be
starting
this
week
and
I
think
they
had
put
like
an
eta
a
couple
weeks
on
their
work,
but
we
gotta
audit
it
launch
it.
You
know
things
take
time,
so
I
wouldn't
hold
up
anything.
B
Cool
and
then
the
other
thing
that
was
on
the
wanted
to
yeah
and
then
the
proposal
process
for
the
worker
trial
period,
and
so
I
think
the
the
way
it
reads
now
where
we've
been
talking
about
this,
would
be
that
the
first
trial
period
proposal
for
two
weeks
that
we've
agreed
on
that
time
period.
B
That
would
actually
just
go
to
dow
talk
first,
rather
than
actually
submitting
a
proposal
on
alchemy
and
then
at
the
end
of
that
two
weeks,
then
the
additional
proposal,
the
the
actual
alchemy
proposal,
would
come
through,
which
would
include
the
time
from
the
two
weeks
and
then
that
would
go
through
the
formal
proposal
process
there.
Obviously
there
would
need
to
be
some
type
of
like
reassurance
or
some
consensus
that
we
want
to
engage
with
with
the
initial
trial
trial
period.
B
So
you
could
imagine
someone,
I
think,
posting
on
dow
talk,
that
they
want
to
start
that
they're
going
to
start
their
trial
period,
and
then
I
think
we
need
to
have
like
some
confirmation
from
maybe
a
squad
leader
or
another,
some
other
geek
style
member.
That's
like
yes,
this
trial
period
is
is,
is
going
to
start
for
the
next
two
weeks
but
yeah,
but
we
wouldn't
have
any
formal
approval
by
governance
system
until
the
formal
proposal
was
was
initiated
after
conclusion
of
trial
period,
which
would
be
for
the
two
months
there.
B
I
think
that
was
the
the
discussion.
So
pulp
was
at
did
that
describe
what
we
were
trying
to
do
and
I.
I
Think
that
that
was
accurate.
The
only
thing
that
martin,
I
kind
of
discussed
a
little
bit
in
the
comments
was,
I
think,
the
simplest
way
to
to
do
this
is,
I
think,
pretty
much.
What
we've
all
been
doing
is
you
know
new
people
come
on
to
a
meeting
and
introduce
themselves-
and
everyone
says:
oh,
this
person's,
going
to
be
a
worker
they're,
going
to
be
doing
x,
y
and
z,
they're,
starting
the
trial
period
now
and
then,
after
the
two
weeks.
I
That's
when
you
know
they
everything
goes
well
assuming
they
put
the
their
post
on
on
dow
talk
and
then,
if
it
gets
approved
on
alchemy,
and
that
would
be
for
two
and
a
half
months
of
work
and
oh
yeah
and
one
other
thing
we
did
do
the
poll
thanks.
Everyone
who
participated
and
it
looks
like
we
actually
had
a
majority
which
is
nice
for
just
the
two
months
after
the
two-week
trial
period
of
doing
80
pay
for
that
time.
I
So
that
would
be
what
what
folks
are
gonna
get
paid
for
their
first
two
and
a
half
months.
It's
a
fifty
percent
for
the
two
week
trial
period
and
then
eighty
percent
of
full
pay
for
the
following
two.
B
Months,
cool
and
martin
just
to
update
you,
because
we
were
just
talking
about
some
of
the
things
you
your
suggestions
on
the
proposal
process,
so
we
did
agree
to
use
the
coin.
Gecko
all-time
high
and
we'll
just
kind
of
be
explicit
with
that
in
there
one
and
then
two
on
the
proposal
process,
it
will
start
the
initial
trial
period.
Workers
scope
will
actually
occur
on
delta,
talk
right
and
then
we'll
have
the.
After
that
two
weeks,
then
you'll
actually
submit
a
formal
proposal.
There,
yeah
you're,
you're,
muted,
well,.
A
B
Yeah,
this
is
a
good
point.
I
think
in
the
I
can't
remember.
Where
exactly
is,
but
I
think
like
we
should
anyone.
That's
working
for
dx
dow
should
get
rep
in
some
amounts,
not
just
full-time
workers,
and
I
think,
like
just
taking
the
proportionate
amount,
that
you're
working
and
getting
paid
for
in
monetary
compensation,
just
taking
that
same
percentage
and
applying
it
to
the
rep
amount.
I
think
makes
sense,
but
I
think
in
the
document
it
was
a
little
unclear
if
it
only
applied
to
full-time
workers.
I
A
Yeah
cool
yeah
onboarding,
you
know
I
send
I
had
like
first-hand
experience.
I
sent
this
sheet
to
the
people
and
some
of
them
really
got
it
and
they
they
tried
to
to
reflect
it
on
their
proposal.
But
it's
not
so
easy.
It's
it's
yeah,
it's
not
so
easy.
Yeah,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff,
still
complicated
in
a
way,
but
it's
the
way.
A
It
is,
I
think,
as
a
guideline
it's
perfect
and
people
can
just
do
it
different
than,
and
I
think
the
digital
has
room
enough
to
be
yeah
like
if
somebody
is
like
doing
it
different,
then
we
have
will
have
some
feedback
and
then
be
changed
if
it's
not
good
but
yeah.
It's
just
that
I
I
have.
Maybe
I
do
it
a
little
different
on
ball,
because
I'm
really,
I
just
tried
to
get
people
in
and
I
I've
it
looks
like
I
failed
with
ali.
You
know
it
blowed
up
anyway.
A
E
B
E
Yeah,
I
wouldn't
consider
that
a
failure
martin,
like
I
think
it
in
my
experience-
people
expect
a
wide
range
of
things
from
like
their
workplace
and
there's
a
big
difference
between
working
at
like
an
established,
large
corporation
and
being
at
a
startup,
and
I
think
what
we're
doing
is
more
like
a
startup
and
maybe
even
a
little
crazier
in
some
ways
and
things
of
all
town
were
distributed
and
all
this
other
stuff,
that's
kind
of
unique
challenges
for
what
we're
doing,
and
it's
not
going
to
be
for
everybody.
E
So
I
wouldn't
beat
yourself
up
about
it.
Yes,
yeah,
it's
okay,.
D
I'm
still
waiting,
I
agree.
Imagine
I
like
some
as
someone
who's
like
who's
leading
some
kind
of
team,
and
I
think
we
have
a
different
role
here
like
we
actually
can't
demand.
We
need
to
be
like
very
respectful
with
our
workers
and
if
the
other
side
is
just
saying
like
I'm,
not
interested
and
then
like,
what
can?
What
can
we
do
right,
yeah
yeah,
they
just
say
no,
and
it's
like
okay.
A
A
Calls-
and
I
I
did
see
that
he's
like
I
know
I
didn't
get,
what
really
his
take
is
and
what
he's
like.
What's
he
struggling
with,
but
yeah
it's
the
way
it
is,
but
in
a
way
I
also
you
know,
I
I
had
another
talk
today
with
a
really
fresh
level,
one
guy
and
for
in
this
one
I
had
a
really
com,
different
complex.
A
F
A
E
D
That's
why,
like
level
like
level
ones,
level
twos,
I
see
them
as
like
a
potential
that
like
if
they,
if
they
are
like
self.
How
do
you
say
like
on
their
own
and
they
learn
how
to
work
with
the
d?
So
I
think
they're
like
way
more
important,
longer
term
for
the
dc,
because
they
learn
how
to
work
with
the
geek
style
and
like
they
are
thriving,
because
they
don't
have
bosses
who
tell
them
all
the
tasks
they
need
to
do,
but
actually
like
caring
about
the
project.
D
I
guess
to
not
like
like
milan
is
one
good
example.
He
he
started
as
like
a
level
one
level
two
needed
to
get
into
react,
but
he
proved
like
very
quickly
to
like
understand
the
d,
so
the
purpose
of
it
that
is
actually
dow
and
then
like.
A
B
Yeah,
both
of
what
just
to
kind
of
close
this
up,
as
you
say,
both
of
what
geronimo
and
martin
said
it's
like
one.
There
are
trade-offs
to
this,
like
whatever
we're
constructing
it's
not
gonna,
be
for
everyone,
but
like
that's
fine.
We
just
need
to
you
know,
be
acknowledge
the
trade-offs
and
and
and
move
forward,
and
I
think
for
me
it's
all
about
you
have
to
get
it
right.
B
We
only
want
people
to
get
it
and,
like
I
don't
really
know
what
it
is
in
a
way,
but
it's
like
everything
that
we're
kind
of
doing
here
and
you
have
to
understand
it
and
like
be
into
it,
and
I
think
we
should
all
try
to
be
good
at
evaluating
whether
or
not
people
get
it
very
quickly
and
then
we
can
kind
of
move
on,
because
it's
just
not
worth
our
time.
If
people
like
don't
get
it
because
you
won't
really,
you
know
lots
of
things
so.
D
Yeah
not
only
evaluating,
but
also
like,
even
if
we're
getting
burned
all
the
time,
I
think
we
should
still
like.
If
someone
is
going
to
the
introduction
chat,
we
need
to
make
sure
we're
shilling
the
out
of
us
right
like
even
if
we're
getting
burned.
We
should
still
be
very
positive
in
making
sure
that
they
have
the
chance
to
get
in
sounds
like
a
religion,
but
it
is
like
this.
J
I'm
happy
I
took
the
extra
steps
with
the
what's
his
name,
the
newest
guy
fury
like
I
was
afraid
of
my
past
experience
and
I
got
burned
too
much
and
I
saw
all
the
patterns
and
it
was
clear
to
me
like
hey.
Maybe
I
shouldn't
like
put
energy
on
this,
but
I
did-
and
I
actually
went
like
really
far
and
talked
to
their
his
old
boss
and
and
everything
was
good.
It
looked
good
and
and
hopefully
like
we
get
something
out
of
that,
but
I
think
yeah.
I
think
it's
it.
J
That's
good,
so
I
I
mean
I
don't
know
in
this
like
we
are
we're
doing
something
that
is
really
hard.
First
of
all,
we
like
onboarding
people
the
same
day
they
talk
to
us
or
whatever
it
is
we're
doing,
and
it's
obviously
in
even
on
the
normal
companies.
It
takes
time
you
can't
just
we
don't
just
have
stuff
prepared
for
zero
day
people.
J
A
A
D
D
Right
right,
like
the
question
is,
can
we
mitigate
ourselves
getting
burned
by
finding
like
ways
to
allow
people
to
still
get
it
like
chris
said
right?
They
just
need
to
get
what
we
are
and
then
get
into
it
and
like
we
need
to
get
those
quizzes
going
and
like
bounties
and
like
they
need
to
find
easy
ways
to
like
okay.
This
is
a
spec.
D
I
just
need
to
code
it
down
easy,
and
then
I
like
need
to
go
through
the
manifesto
and
get
those
answers
in
to
like
start
talking,
and
I
think
those
ways
like
we
need
to
find
ways
to
not
get
burned
because
money,
you
don't
actually
want
to
do,
and
I
accept
that
but
yeah
and
we,
the
others.
We
still
need
to
like
try
to
to
continue
and
to
like,
be
very
open.
A
I
think
it's
different
if
it's,
if
we
find
somebody
who
is
like
doing
it
from
time
to
time,
then
he
has
like
his
own
style
and
also
he's
not
really
yeah.
You
know,
for
me,
it's
also
like
a
distraction
and
if
somebody
says
it's
more
his
task
doing
this
stuff,
then
it's
would
be
more
easy,
because
this
person
is
more
neutral
in
a
way
and.
J
Yeah,
I
I
think
it
would
be
a
good
thing
if
we-
maybe
I
don't
know
if
it's
good
now,
it's
good
timing,
but
we
should
get
like
some
kind
of
hr
person
that
is
also
like
a
recruiter
or
or
can
like,
maybe
like
find.
A
J
A
D
J
A
J
I
Yeah
definitely
one
follow-up
question.
I
just
looked
over
everything
regarding
the
guidelines
and
the
only
remaining
thing
that
martin
brought
up
and
we've
talked
about
it
before,
but
just
want
a
final
confirmation
on
is,
if
you
max
out
on
rep,
like
some
of
our
some
folks
have
do
we
want
to
offer
dxd
as
an
alternative
when
you're
no
longer
able
to
receive
rep
through
your
work
or
compensation.
A
I
myself,
I
think
it's
not
good
to
have
like
this
may
may
style
writing,
because
in
a
way
somebody
who
is
like
maxed
out
the
rap
he
maybe
he
comes
later
and
tells
us
yeah.
You
know
I
didn't
get
rap
at
this
time,
so
I
can
like
have
it
now
and
I
think
we
should
clarify
this
right.
It
may
produce
some
problems
in
the
future
because-
and
I
think.
I
It's
yeah
right,
so
you
mean
the
idea
that
someone
doesn't
request
dxd
when
they've
maxed
out
on
rep
and
then
later
on,
say
hey.
I
never
got
the
dxd,
I
never
requested
yeah,
so
we
either
we
can
either
say
you
know.
There's
this!
You
are
you
know
you.
Can
you
receive
this
amount
of
dxd
or
we
just
say
you
max
out
and
rep,
and
you
know
that's
it.
How
do
people
feel
about
that?
I
It
was
something
that
was,
I
kind
of
just
grandfathered
in
from
the
previous
guidelines
for
worker
compensation
that
we
had
written
in
there,
but
it
doesn't
seem
like
anyone's
opted
to
use
it.
Yet
so
maybe
it's
just
more
complicated,
I'm
only
two
chair
anymore.
I
think
john,
have.
A
H
H
It
would
be
a
good
way
to
like
keep,
maybe
on
a
side
ledger,
keep
track
of
some
of
the
rep
that
people
are
it's
passing
by
them
or
that
they're
not
accumulating,
because
if,
if
we
we
don't
have
a
way
to
cap
their
vote
now,
but
in
the
future
we
hopefully
will-
and
you
kind
of
they've
still
earned
this
reputation
for
contributions
to
the
exile.
I
H
So
that's
one
path,
the
other,
because
I
don't
I'm
not.
I
I
it
is
like
getting
dxd,
which
is
financial
reward
in
place
of
rep,
and
we've
moved
away
from
like
the
kind
of
the
financial
value
of
rep
other
than
maybe
rep
will
get
dxd
like
distribution
in
the
future,
or
something
like
that.
We're
not.
We
don't
currently
have
a
dollar
value
of
rep,
so
so
giving
dxd
or
eth
instead
of
rep
does
seem
a
little
weird.
I
Right
well
now,
and
also
dxd
will
have
managerial
voting
power
rights
in
the
future.
So
in
a
way
you
are
getting
some
voting
power
by
get
by
receiving
dxt
just
to
kind
of
flip
that
for
future
stuff,
but
yeah
I
mean
I,
I
think
it's
it's
okay,
to
have
an
open
moment
here,
though,
about
you
know
if
if
people
are
working
and
they
should
be
rewarded
for
their
work,
I
think
we
kind
of
talked
about
this
briefly
yesterday
about,
like
some
forms
of
you,
know,
proposal
rewards
and
stuff
like
that
with
dxd.
I
This
doesn't
necessarily
this
kind
of
fits
into
that
same
category.
Just
because
you've
been
you
know,
continuing
to
work
for
or
contribute
you
know
and
being
paid
by
by
the
dao
doesn't
mean
you
should
stop
receiving
some
sort
of
additional
compensation,
but
we
also
have
the
salary.
You
know
scale
in
place
right
now,
so
maybe
we
just
leave
that
to
something
like
once.
I
I
know
chris
is
thinking
about
source
cred
as
a
potential
avenue
for
us
as
far
as
rewarding
work
done
instead
of
something
like
this,
you
know
capped
on
rep,
here's
dxd
thing.
H
Yeah
john
mentions
nft,
so
there
are
actually
some
other
echo
systems
in
the
d5
space
who
are
thinking
about
like,
for
example,
like
well-known
devs,
who
have
the
dev
knowledge.
They
get
a
certain
nft
which
makes
them
like
a
dev
expert
in
that
ecosystem,
and
then
there
are
certain
proposals
and
things
that
they
that
only
people
with
those
like
knowledge,
nfts
can
propose.
So
I
know
right
now
we
have
an
open
ecosystem,
but
it
may
be
with
gov,
2.0
or
dx
vote.
H
So
it
like
it
like
it
really
allows
specialization
and
there's
other
deep
ecosystems
doing
that.
Apparently,
I
think.
B
Yeah
I
mean,
then
it's
really
cool
when
you
think
about
compensation
from
dx
dow.
It's
like
you
get
paid
in
money
dollars,
eth
whatever
you
want
to
say,
dxd
this
thing
rep,
which
is
non-transferable
and
then
like
nfts
right
in
some
ways.
I
don't
know
it's
just
kind
of
cool
to
think
of
the
possibilities
on
that.
I
think
it
does
kind
of
introduce
some
flexibility
and
maybe
attract
some
different
people.
So.
I
Right,
I
think
it's
a
cool
idea
as
far
as
I
think,
even
attracting
people
that
aren't
full-time
contributors
potentially
to
be
able
to
do
nf
like
a
proposal
or
something
like
that
in
their
special
specialty,
especially
if
they're
holding
dxd
or
one
of
our
other
tokens
to
kind
of
feel
like
they
have
like
more
management
responsibilities
within
the
dow.
I
think
that
could
be
the
most
useful
place
for
it.
B
Cool
yeah
I
just
want
to
keep
moving
on
next.
I
want
to
talk
about
the
omen
guild
as
there's
a
fire
truck
coming
down
my
street
now
so
jeronimo.
If
you
want
to
kick
off
here
on,
I
guess
this
is
kind
of
like
what's
the
governance
structure
of
a
potential
omen
guild,
so
there
was
the
post
about
introducing
an
omen
token,
but
like
how
exactly
does
that
governance
stack?
Look?
Does
it
look
like
dallas
stack?
B
This
looks
like
one
of
the
other
systems,
so
you
want
to
kick
us
off
and
not
what
you're
thinking.
D
Yeah,
like
you
already
said,
we
have
actually
two
paths
forward
right.
We
have
developed
a
dxd
guild
contract
which
could
be
an
alternative.
This
would
mean
we
would
go
the
liquid
token
governance
routes.
D
Would
I'm
like
more,
like
I'm
more
conservative
and
would
actually
try
to
convince
everyone
that
we
should
use
a
dial
stack
clone
with
with
the
ability
to
allow
people
to
lock
omen
tokens
in
in
in
one
year
or
two-year
contract
which
allow
them
to
like
receive
rep
throughout
the
time
period
and
yeah?
There
are
like
several
reasons
why
I
think
the
dow
stick
clone
is
the
better
is
a
safer
path
forward
for
us.
D
The
interesting
part
is
like:
if
we
actually
implementing
governance
super
no,
we
we
need
to
make
sure
that
the
guild
itself
will
transition
into
the
governance
2.0
structure
too
so,
and
another
interesting
idea
with
that
would
be
that
we
could
actually
try
to
like
transition
the
guild
first
to
see
the
impact
of
it
and
then,
like,
hopefully,
see
positive
results
out
of
it,
and
then
we
could
like
transition,
the
dx
star
itself
into
government
supernova.
D
So
that's
like
the
first
point
and
yeah
it's
and
it's
like.
More
importantly,
for
us,
we
established
the
brand
about
like
non-transferable
voting
power
in
combination
with,
like
a
revenue
sharing
token
model,
because
we
believe
liquid
token
governance
is
not
resilient
enough
and
it's
just
actually
bad.
D
That's
my
personal
view,
and
if
we
would
give
up
that
in
with
the
guilds,
we
would
lose
a
little
bit
of
our
brand
and
our
like
culture
of
how
to
govern.
D
So
that's
that's
my
point
of
view
in
terms
of
like
why
we
should
like
and
the
third
point
actually,
my
goal
with
the
guild
was
to
not
have
like
a
stupid
guilt,
which
is
just
like
for
publicity
like
my
goal,
is
that
the
guild
is
doing
things
way
better
than
the
dxo
cam,
because
these,
though,
is
a
like
slow
cockroach
and
the
guild
needs
to
be
like
the
guild's
job
is
to
make
omen
successful,
and
it
can
be
done
because
it
has
way
like
a
way
ways:
a
smaller
treasury.
D
So
it
doesn't
require
like
crazier
time
to
pass
proposals.
It
needs
to
be
flexible.
It
needs
to
needs
to
move
fast
for
omen
and
with
that
I
think
daosec
is
still
like
the
most
capable
to
to
deliver
everything
quickly,
because
we
are
professionals
in
in
the
darsak
system.
We
know
how
to
deal
with
dxdow.
We
know
how
to
operate
on
several
networks
and
it
would
be
easier
for
us
to
use
the
dow
stick
system.
E
I
would
describe
this
as
like,
basically,
the
selection
of
the
governance
framework
for
the
omen
guild
like
what
are
we
going
to
use
and
there's
you
know,
I
think
downstairs
kind
of
the
obvious
and
obvious
possibility.
Erc
20
guilds
is
maybe
another.
I
think,
there's
a
few
dimensions
on
like
how
to
think
about
this.
E
You
know,
I
think
the
one
that
we
should
be
answering
now
is
like
what
does
the
dxo
community
expect
like
from
a
governance
perspective
like
what
are
we
holding
ourselves
to
on
like
how
this
kind
of
like
at
a
high
level
should
work?
I
think,
in
addition,
we
should
also
take
kind
of
do
like
a
technical
evaluation.
E
Almost
do
like
a
a
trade
study
on
like
how
the
two
would
work
from
things
like
gas
costs
and
stuff
like
that,
but
we
can
do
that
separately
when
we
have
the
time.
I
think
the
important
thing
right
now
is
like
yeah.
What
like
toronto
was
saying.
Like
he's
being
conservative,
you
know
we
should
stick
with
non-transferable
governance
rights
like.
E
Is
that
what
we
want,
I
think
maybe
a
third
dimension
is
like
what
do
we
think
the
wider
community
market
etc
would
want
and
react
to
based
on
things,
but
I
don't
really
know
how
to
assess
that.
But
yeah.
D
Yeah
so
like
we
had
to
internal
calls,
like
john
john
and
skye
and
john
actually
like
pitched
the
idea
about
using
just
like
esc,
20
guilds
and
like
first,
we
need
to
know
how,
like
technically,
on
par,
is
it
with
a
proper
dullstake
clone,
which
can
actually
do
like
everything
what
the
dxdow
can
but
better
for
omen
and
that's
yeah,
that's
something
we
actually
need
to
find
contents
and
like
hopefully,
very
soon,
because
we
need
to
move
forward.
We
need
to
execute
on
the
omen
guilds
right.
D
E
Voting
like
important
at
the
guild
level,
and
then
another
like
nuance
to
this
is
we're
moving
towards
governance,
2.0
right
even
at
the
high
level,
so
like
our
current
system
at
for
dx,
now
isn't
really
like
a
complete
system.
That's
what
we
want
governance
2.0.
For
so
I
mean
that's
another
thing
to
consider.
F
I
I
want
to
add
here
that
you
know,
because
there
is
like
governance,
2.0
stuff.
The
omen
guild
should
like
experiment
with
stuff,
and
you
know
in
this
case
it's
kind
of
giving
omen
token
holders
the
ability
to
gain
reputation
from
locking
it,
which
is
this
an
experiment.
Maybe
omen
will
do
a
sorry,
maybe
a
swapper
guild
we'll
do
a
different
experiment
and
yeah.
D
D
Yeah
100,
like
even
like,
I
would
even
go
further
and
say
we
will
learn
it
for
the
d
star
itself,
like
what
we
need
to
make
sure
is
that
we
allow
the
guild
to
say
hello
to
the
world
with
like
complete,
open
arms
and
not
like,
like
we
would
still
probably
do
like
a
clone
just
to
have
like
this
backup,
wrap
and
zombie
wrap
with
us.
But
what
we
need
to
make
sure
is
like
I
would.
D
I
would
expect
we
should
do
like
a
70,
80
new
minted
rep,
just
to
make
sure
that,
like
all
the
omen
token
holders
have
the
chance
like
to
actually
take
ownership
of
it
and
not
to
like
present
it.
It's
like.
Oh,
this
is
another
d
style
red
control
thing
like
we
need
to
completely
say:
okay.
This
needs
to
go
out
primarily
because
the
d
star
still
has
like
has
set
the
boundaries
to
where
the,
where
the
guild
can
move
and
how
it
operates.
D
I
Yeah,
I
think,
that's
a
great
idea.
I
think
it
would
be
nice
to
kind
of
turn
our
experiment
a
little
bit
on
its
head
and
see
when
you
really
give
we've
seen
another,
but
you
still
have
some
form
of
rep
and
there's
a
locking
mechanism,
and
we
can
use
some
of
the
formulas
that
we're
still
planning
on
using
for
governance
2.0
to
allow
the
omen
token
holders
to
fully
control
omen.
B
D
What
we
can
do-
and
I
think
that
is
definitely
like
the
right
way-
is
separating
the
roadmap
for
the
guild
and
the
omen
token,
because
the
oma
product
actually
needs
the
guild
to
be
better.
So
we
like
install
the
guild
without
the
token
first
and
then
we
like
open
it
up
and
have
it
operational
functional
with
all
the
tasks
already
available,
because
we
need
to
curate
markets.
D
We
need
to
curate
tokens
and,
like
several
other
things,
so
we
need
to
set
up
the
system
and
then
we
open
it
up
with
the
with
the
token.
So
my
point
was
like:
if
we,
if
we
say
right
now,
we
want
to
keep
the
rap
omen,
the
the
rap-based
governance.
D
Then
we
could
move
ahead
with
having
a
clear
deliverable
regarding
how
the
omen
guild
should
be
installed,
and
that
could
help
us
for
the
oman
product,
because
we
already
could
like
start
installing
the
connections
to
the
product
with
the
guild.
H
Yeah,
so
there's
a
there's
a
pretty
high
chance
that
a
lot
of
the
omen
guild
activity
could
actually
be
taking
place
on
x-die
and
that
that
will
be
related
to
omen
on
x-die
and
that
will
be
related
to
maybe
worker
payments
to
omen
guild
worker
contributors
on
x
die.
So
it
will
be.
That's
that's.
H
That
alone
is
another
experiment
like
if
90
of
the
activity
omen
gill
does
is
on
x,
die
and
it's
using
like
rep,
initially
that
that
could
move
very
quickly
and
that
is
it
you'll
get
to
see
what
what
like,
alchemy
and
rep,
how
it
works
with
like
a
larger
community
on
xdi
in
an
active
product.
D
100,
like
I
actually
even
expect
that
the
guild
will
kind
of
start
on
x,
die
and
then
do
like
a
lot
of
operational
tasks,
because
I
hope
omen
will
be
successful
on
next
day
in
the
next
weeks.
So
they
will
be
like
the
guilds
can
do
great
stuff
for
the
oman
platform
and
we
yeah
so
that.
I
E
Because,
if
that
is
the
consensus,
then
I
would
think
it
would
make
sense
to
give
a
good
look
at
the
erc20
guilds
that
we're
building
anyways
and
see
how
that
compares
from
a
technical
perspective
to
darkly.
D
Right
but
there's
a
such
a
small
caveat
here
right
like
we
could
also
kind
of
make
sure
that
the
omen
token
holders
can
properly
get
ownership
with
a
web-based
system
too.
Right
like
we
could
even
say.
Okay,
this
locking
contract
for
two
years
will
mean
100
new
rep,
and
we
can
even
make
sure
that,
like
on
initial
rep
state,
it
is
not
only
the
geek
style
rep
state
right
now,
but
we
could
make
sure
that
api
three
is
getting
some
some
say
in
it.
D
Gnosis
is
getting
some
said
in
red,
so
we
could
actually
like
make
the
initial
rep
state
grow
and
make
us
smaller
to
make
sure
that
the
other
teams
are
actually
like
getting
rap
ownership
of
it
and
that's
like
not
possible,
with
the
esc,
20
guild
wars,
which
is
purely
liquid
token,
governance.
B
Yeah,
I
think
it's
so
cool
that,
like
we're
talking
about
different
governance,
structures
that
like
dxdow
has
experimenting
is
experimenting
and
that
we
can
like
plug
and
play
them
right
now.
I
think
it
does
speak
a
lot
to
like
the
governance
capabilities
that
were
developing
that,
like,
as
we
launched
this
new
thing,
it's
like
whoa,
we've
done
this
in
the
past
we've
considered
this
like,
which
is,
which
is
the
best
the
way
I
kind
of
you
know.
B
B
But
there
will
be
lots
of
different
adjustments
that
they'll
probably
want
to
make
to
the
different
components,
but
just
as
like
a
broad
level
of
like
how
to
try
to
like
combine
those
those
two,
I
think
maybe
it's
a
model
for
those,
but
I
think
with
geeks
dow,
like
the
existing
or
the
the
the
model
that
we're
trying
to
build
towards
is
very
much
dependent
on
deke
styles
experience
with
distributing
rep
two
years
ago
and
like
launching
a
d
style
fundraiser,
the
way
dhd
fundraiser.