►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Meeting [2021-02-10]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
february,
10th
2021,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
lots
of
different
worker
proposals,
there's
been
almost
kind
of
a
jam.
I
guess
in
the
in
the
proposal
queue
I
think,
there's
11
different
proposals
that
are
boosted
now
so
there's
one
for
federico.
Cayden.
B
And
yeah
and
then
there
is
two
separate
eth
to
die
transfers
right.
So
I
think
the
first
one
is
supposed
to
be
transferred,
I
think,
to
the
multisig
today
or
it's
13
hours,
and
so
that's
a
hundred
teeth
and
that
will
be
transferred
and
then
sent
back.
I
think
that's
the
second
time
the
multi-stake
is
done
the
transfer
and
then
there's
another
one
that
just
got
boosted.
B
That
is
another
exchange
for
each
die.
That
will
has
actually
not
been
voted
on,
but
we'll
presumably
go
ahead
in
five
five
and
a
half
days.
I
think
the
only
thing
interesting
about
that
is
it
does
show
how
we
can
be
somewhat
strategic
in
terms
of
like
boosting
proposals
and
having
ones
go
forward,
because
I
think
the
second
proposal
was
actually
submitted
before
the
first
proposal.
B
But
the
first
proposal
has
the
wallet
identifiers
or
I
guess,
signatures
in
it
there.
So
it's
good
that
that
proposal
went
first
and
then
the
other
proposal
could
then
just
be
boosted
and
put
into
the
queue
there.
And
then
there
is
the
all
press
workers
proposal.
I
guess
all
press
is
the
name
for
almanite,
or
I
don't
know
which
is
hominy
is
the
blog
I'll
press,
the
the
company,
and
so
that's
the
first
one
of
two.
B
So
it's
a
7
500
payment
and
this
is
to
build
a
textile
blog.
They
already
have
the
prototype
out
and
it
uses
ens
and
ipfs
to
do
it
skye,
and
I
I've
checked
it
out
and
it's
a
pretty
pretty
cool
product.
I
think
so.
That'll
be
interesting
and
of
course
this
is
this
is
paying
for
services
but
and
mostly
to
to
build
the
dxdot
blog.
B
But
this
there
is
also
interest
of
maybe
potentially
funding
and
investing
in
now
press
as
part
of
that
and
we've
skye's
been
working
on
dx
ventures
posts
for
that.
If
you're
interested
in
more
like
that
and
then
the
last
there
is
another
member
balancer
proposal,
so
I
think
we're
up
to
like
350k
that's
been
transferred
through
the
through
that
and
not
that
yeah,
I'm
not
going
350
on
member
balancer
right.
No.
B
Through
the
treasury,
including
the
yeah,
because
I
think
there's
been
this-
is
the
third
member
balancer
one.
I
think
it
was
like
yeah
like
50
50
80.
I
think
yeah.
D
B
Poor
one
out
for
yeah-
and
so
I
guess
that
will
be
we'll
just
keep
kind
of
this
pattern.
I
think
both
of
them,
you
know
we'll
get
there.
We
have,
you
know
a
sizeable
chunk
of
stable
coins
there
and,
of
course,
I
think,
almost
all
of
the
proposals
this
month
actually
are
requesting
some
amount
in
stable
coins
as
a
way
yeah.
C
There's
so
we
have
a
ambitious
goal
to
get
stable
coins.
Obviously,
we've
been
slower
than
we
thought.
We're
gonna
go
with
some
like
drawbacks,
but
luckily
youth
price
is
going
up,
but
we
still
need
to
like
get
this
going
faster,
so
like
in
the
in
the
multi-sig
method.
C
I
think
in
the
authorization
proposal
like
we
could
do.
I
think
it
was
a
hundred
eth
like
every
two
days
so
like
that
would
be
the
fastest
pace
to
like
run
that
to
run
that
method
and
if
people
think
that
that's
a
good
way
to
do
it.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
we're
kind
of
I
assume
we're
kind
of
on
pace
and
I
think
there's
like
obviously
like
a.
We
want
to
get
stable
coins
in
the
treasury,
but
I
think
there's
something
if
you're
like
diversifying
like,
I
think
dollar
cost
averaging
just
has
its
benefits.
Yep
there
we
go,
martin's
got
the
dca
there
and
I
think
it
also
puts
like
some
impetus
on
us
to
use.
I
think
like
gnosis
protocols
like
when
we
want
the
relay,
we
want
to
be
able
to
use
that.
B
So
the
only
other
thing
I'd
add
is,
I
do
think
we
need
to
have
and
I'll
get
to
this
later,
a
proposal
on
potentially
moving
some
funds
into
the
x
die
dx
dow,
and
so
the
question
is:
will
that
go
through
how?
What
what
process
will
you
use
for
that.
D
Well,
yeah
the
two
day
point
like
that's
right
about
the
authorization
proposal
and
the
most
and
the
there's
two
active
ones
right
now
for
the
multisig
one,
which
is,
you
know
about
half
a
day
out
from
potentially
passing
and
then
another
one
that
has
been
boosted
for
about
like
a
day
just
over
a
day
now
so
like
if
it
takes
a
data
boost
and
now
this
one's
been
boosted
for
days,
so
we're
basically
like
10
hours
into
when
you
could
actually
make
another
one
now.
So
I
don't
think.
D
B
Now
cool
any
thoughts
on
the
proposals
or
anything
outstanding,
I
know
there's
some
a
couple
promos
that
they
need
to
be
boosted
that
are
working
proposals.
I've
got
my
eye
on
today.
Maybe
when
gas
prices
come
down,
but
anything
else,
people.
C
We,
it
hadn't
been
including
redeems
in
the
past,
and
now
I
believe
it
will
be,
including
redeems,
because
redeems
are
like
a
mandatory
part
of
the
process
and,
like
you,
don't
have
a
choice
and
you're
not
like
just
because
you're
claiming
your
money,
you're,
not
getting
extra
money.
Usually
so
I
believe
that
the
redeems
will
be
refunded
90
as
well,
at
least
for
now,
even
though
I
don't
know
if
that's
written
anywhere,
yet
it
would
probably
be
part
of
like
the
next
refund
proposal,
that
nico
would
post
an
outline.
F
D
F
Redeems,
the
gas
playback
or
whatever
we
call
it
and
like
yeah
just
do
it,
because
I
think
everyone's
thinking
later
later
later
and
then
goes
month,
and
then
you
actually
miss
it.
B
So
I
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
We
could
we
could
do
it
on
this
call.
I
think
my
guess
is
like
next.
I
think
the
governance
gas
refunds,
the
third
one
is
out
now
so
nico,
I'm
guessing.
We
are
probably
another.
I
don't
remember
if
I've
claimed
that
one,
but
we
need
there's
another
proposal
that
I
could.
I
think
I've
already
claimed
mine,
but
if
someone
wants
to
the
next
week
or
or
whenever
we're
through
the
next
gas
refunds,
I
think
that's
a
good
idea.
F
F
B
The
only
I
have
been
waiting
because
that
gas-
it's
actually
very
it's
very
cost
efficient.
It's
not
very
much,
but
it
is
like
probably
now
like
15
or
so
dollars
to
claim
that
that's
why
I've
been
waiting
for
that
to
go
down,
but
it's
a
it's
a
pretty
easy
process
and
I
think
yeah
it
doesn't.
I
don't
know
what
the
exact
way
is
cost,
but.
G
C
So
so
that
would
be
a
good
practice
that
we
can
start,
and
these
things
should
sit
in
the
in
the
docs
thing
that
that
keenan
and
milan
violet
have
been
working
on
the
the
thing.
The
problem,
the
main
problem
is
right
now
these
docs
that
like
show
people
how
to
do
this
stuff
exist,
but
they're
like
google
docs
sitting
out
there
in
the
ether.
C
F
Hopefully,
in
the
future,
we
don't
have
this
problem,
but
we
will
have.
We
have
our
own
dashboard,
our
own
place,
where,
like
our
own
version
of
alchemy,
whatever
it
could
be,
we
actually
have
a
button
where
you
press
or
it's
you
can
see
like
hey.
Your
account
has
this
much
to
claim
right,
and
that
would
be
the
right
way
to
do
it.
C
So
so
already
nico
could
take,
we
could
take
the
spreadsheet
and
we
could
do
like
a
multi-call
that
sends
refunds
to
everyone,
but
I
think
the
idea
was
that
well,
at
least
in
the
past,
the
original
one,
which
was
everything
in
the
like
for
a
year.
B
B
Cool
but
I'll
shoot
for.
I
think
regardless,
let's
do
next
week,
I
think
I
have
not
we
can.
We
can
figure
out
a
a
claim,
video
we'll
do
it
on
this
call
to
do
that.
F
C
B
C
G
Yeah,
what
about
not
dot
ethers
like
dot
crypto
and
the
handshake
guys
yeah?
I
don't
know
they've
been
like
publicly
sort
of
attacking
ens,
so.
C
Yeah
not
crypto
is
less
interesting.
The
handshake
thing
which
there's
a
handful
of
people
I
I've
talked
to
that
know
a
lot
about
it,
it
that
can
like
literally
change
the
way
the
internet
works
like
there's
a
decent
chance
that
a
browser
embeds
handshake,
which
is
a
really
light
browser
client,
apparently
that
can
they
can
do
it
versus
embedding
like
dot
eth
like
because
the
handshake
is
like
dot
everything.
C
So,
if
a
brow,
if,
if
a
browser
is
gonna,
allow
that
functionality,
you
would
think
they
would
allow
dot
handshake
over
like
dot
eth.
A
I
mean
that's
not
even
the
main
issue.
The
only
question
we
need
to
ask
is
is
a
dx,
though
able
to
govern
non-ens
domains?
If
not,
then
we
don't
need
to
talk
about
it
like
handshake.
Is
the
d
star
is
not
able
to
hold
handshake
stuff?
So
then
handshake
is
not
an
option.
C
How
do
you,
how
do
you
handle
handshake
is,
is
its
own
blockchain,
right,
yep,
okay,
so
the
the
x
dialog
is
expanding
to
multi-chain
world,
so
dx
dow
could
be
on
that
blockchain
too
right.
A
B
Geronimo's
bags
for
him
yeah,
I
was
just
pretending
I
was
geronimo
there
yeah,
I
mean
I'm
not
sure
if
it's
like
possible
now,
but
maybe
it
I
just
think
like
owning
property.
Owning
real
estate,
like
you
think,
is
like
the
you
know
this
world
decentralized
world's
expanse.
I
think
these
are
like
things.
We
should
be
keeping
an
eye
ion.
B
Cool,
okay
and
then
moving
on
the
contributor
guides
are
up
on
xdi
dxdo,
so
I
want
to
get
to
the
x
die
stuff
in
a
second.
I
have
some
things
to
share
on
on
what
we
can
maybe
do
there,
but
those
are
up
there
and
they.
Luckily
I
I
didn't.
Actually
I
didn't
have
any
gen,
but
I
saw
someone
boosted
them
and
said:
it'll
go
through
the
same
process
there
and
yeah
pop.
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
to
add
or.
B
B
Yeah
and
then
just
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
update,
is
that
so
the
dxd
buyback
and
then
like
treasury
stuff,
we've
been
working
on
a
bit
and
so
there's
some
things
that
polson
working
on
john
and
so
we're
gonna
touch
on
some
of
the
plans
or
what
we
can
do
with
that
tomorrow
on
the
resource
coordination.
B
Gas
is
too
damn
high.
I
think
everyone
knows
that
everyone's
experienced
that
even
when
dick
stow
is,
is
reimbursing
it.
I
still
get
like
anxiety,
like
spending
hundreds
of
dollars
on
transactions,
and
I'm
still
also
trying
to
you
know,
even
if
I
that
deke
style
is
is
reimbursing
it,
there
still
is
a
cost
to
dx
dow
and
as
a
rep
holder
as
a
dxd
holder,
I
would
hope
that
we
can
figure
out
how
to
minimize
it
so
yeah,
so
just
kind
of
a
overview
of
where
we
are.
B
You
know:
we've
been
subsidizing
gas
for
several
months.
This
is
an
overhead
cost,
the
cost
of
doing
business,
and
I
think,
we've
all
understood
that
it
does
allow.
You
know
us
to
coordinate
and
have
that.
I
calculated
in
the
fall
that
we
were
spending
about
seven
to
ten
each.
I
think
one
one
month
we
were,
we
did
about
18
per
month,
but
that
was
only
four
to
six
thousand
dollars
at
the
time.
Given
ease
price.
B
I
don't
know
exactly
what
we'll
know
for
another
month
when,
when
niko
does
the
gas
refunds,
but
I
would
guess
it's
somewhere,
like
maybe
in
like
the
28th
range
for
30
days,
just
considering
the
the
the
cost
for
submitting
a
proposal
boosting
a
proposal
voting
on
a
proposal.
You
know
we
could
be
spending
upwards
of
like
30
30
000
in
in
cost
every
month
on
that,
and
so
I
think
that's
just
something
we
need
to
to
minimize
and
figure
out
a
system
for
that.
So
obviously,
oh
wait.
B
So
we
set
this
base
up
in
the
fall.
It
involved
a
somewhat
complicated
process
of
mapping
rep
holders
because
there's
a
safe
issues,
nylon
and
pepo
actually
did
some
really
great
work
there.
B
B
So
what
do
we
need
to
do
this?
I
think,
first
and
foremost,
we
do
need
some
type
of
authorization
proposal
from
mainnet
connecting
this
xdx
style
to
dxl
partially.
So
we
can
authorize.
B
Partly
so
we
can
authorize
some
of
the
specific
actions
that
are
going
to
be
done
like
if
we're
going
to
have
something
like
the
contributor
guidelines
like
how
do
we
know
that,
and
also
because
there
are
a
couple
different
xd
excels
on
xdi,
so
making
sure
that
we
authorize
the
right.
One,
I
think
is,
is
somewhat
important.
B
B
We
had
already
done
this
before
with
the
getting
the
10k
in
there
10k
in
there
and
then
yeah
we
can
kind
of
handle
that
I
think
handle
the
convert
and
deposit
or
convert
bridge
and
deposit
all
through
like
the
multi
sig.
Oh
sorry,
so
it's
xdi,
I've
got
x,
style,
almost
everywhere
else,
yeah
and
then
things
we
need
to
do.
B
Obviously,
we
need
to
review
and
monitor
the
proposals
on
xdi
so
like
we
need
to
start
doing
that
on
this
call,
we
need
to
start
people
like
going
to
xdi
just
to
see
what's
going
on
there
and
then
the
big
requirement
on
contributors
is
that
contributors
will
need
to
deal
with
the
x
die
to
mainnet
migration,
or,
I
guess
bridge
is
probably
a
better
word.
B
It
should
be
used
here
so
that
you
get
paid
in
presumably
xdi
or,
and
then
the
contributor
would
be
responsible
for
bridging
that
back
to
mainnet
or
elsewhere.
I
don't
know.
C
Is
a
bridge
transaction
for
you
personally,
and
it's
actually
really
cheap
and
efficient
compared
to
like
anything
on
alchemy.
So
it's
that's,
not
a
big
issue.
It's
just
it's
a!
I
guess.
It's
a
technical!
The
bridge
is
pretty
easy,
but
it's
a
technical
know-how,
extra
step,
but,
like
priced
cost
wise,
it's
like
it's
really
good.
It's
it's!
It's
super
efficient
and
cheap.
So
it
sounds
like
we
need
a
video
in
our
docs
to
explain
that
yeah
yeah
we
yeah
those
already
exist.
We
can.
We
can
make
it
like
a.
C
B
And
then
the
docs
like
to
it,
I
every
time
I
go
there,
I'm
like
that
is
their
website,
that's
kind
of
cool.
I
think
yeah
yeah,
just
to
kind
of
highlight
you
know
the
problems
and
risks
before
kind
of
getting
more
specific,
so
like
rep,
so
there's
no
updating
of
rep
balances
between
the
two
like
these
are
basically
separate
entities.
The
only
way
that
we're
saying
that
this
would
be
like
geek
styles
bass
is
because
the
rep
mapping
matches
the
rep
holders.
B
I
guess
it's
actually
from
like
seven
or
two
or
three
months
ago,
but
there's
no
updating
wrote
balances
between
the
two
we'll
have
to
think
about
how
to
what
we.
What
we
think
about
that
and
then
second
is.
B
We
cannot
do
mainnet
rep
distribution
from
x
dot,
so
I
think
rep
distribution
on
mainnet
is
still
very
important,
so
I
don't
know
if
that
means
we
bundle
proposals
in
like
three
or
four
six
month
time
periods
and
do
rep
rewards
all
in
one,
but
we'll
have
to
figure
out
that
and
we
cannot
control
dns
names.
So
there'll
still
be
a
lot
of
overhead
that
will
be
functioning
from
the
other
schemes
that
we'll
need
to
maintain
on
there
and
then
lower
security.
B
Just
make
sure
we
understand
this
like
xdi
is
a
sidechain
or
maybe
even
a
multi-sig.
If
you
want
to
be
not
very
generous,
so
yeah,
so
that's
why
we
probably
shouldn't
be.
You
know,
moving
all
of
geeks
down
there,
but
I
don't
think
anyone
wants
to
do
that,
but
we
should
be
aware
of
some
of
the
the
security
concerns
and
sort
of
the
problems
there.
So
thoughts
nylon,
you
had
some
ideas
on
on
rep
map.
G
Yeah
so
basically
there's
a
solution,
sort
of
to
mapping
the
rep
onto
mainnet-
and
this
can
be
essentially
done
with
one
like
with
one
multi
call.
There's
a
scheme.
That's
called:
it's
basically
called
the
reputation
admin
which
gets.
You
know
an
amount
of
reputation.
It
can
mint.
G
Then
you
we
would
be
registering
that
scheme
and
then
you
know
giving
a
reputation
to
a
list
of
addresses,
and
then
we
can
do
that,
like
once
every
three
months
like
once,
every
quarter
or
once
every
six
months
and
just
update,
you
know
the
changes
from
x.uminet
that,
like
redeeming,
that
transaction
is
probably
going
to
be
very
expensive
because
it
takes
basically
a
list
of
addresses
and
the
respectable
reputation.
G
I
managed
to
mint
reputation
to
100
addresses
when
I
tested
this,
but
that
that
was
basically
filling
up
a
block,
so
like
all
the
gas
in
a
block,
so
it
will
be
very
expensive
yeah.
So
that's
that
and.
B
That
can
work,
and
I
mean
I
just
I
think,
being
able
to
like
distribute
rep
to
multiple
dresses
is
like
extremely
important
and,
like
the
biggest,
I
think,
impediment
to
like
how
we
kind
of
scale
on
main
net.
Now
like
we
can
transfer
funds
in
many
different
ways.
We
have
like
the
multi,
we
have,
the
different
we'll
have
x
die
and
we
can
even
use
like
the
multisig
for
something
if
we
needed
to
but
like
rep,
is
a
challenge.
So
this
is
a
good.
B
D
G
It's
sort
of
sort
of
disposable.
Let's
say
you
know:
okay,
this
quarter.
We
want
to
mint
a
hundred
thousand
reputation
because
that's
how
much
we
got
so
you
initiate
the
scheme
with
a
hundred
thousand
reputation
and
then
call
it
with.
You
know
the
proper
basically
list
of
addresses
yeah,
and
I
think
I
wanted
to
say
one
more
thing,
but
can
you
put
the
presentation
back,
oh
yeah
or
next
time,
yeah?
I
was
kind
of
looking
into
some
security.
G
I
was
talking
to
ayal
from
almonitz
about
like
deploying
on
xda
and
all
that
stuff
and
he's
like
you
know
this.
It's
it's
worse
than
a
multi-sig.
It's
got
like
five
nodes
running
all
on
aws
and
yeah.
I
mean
this
is
just
so
you
know
we
are
aware:
it's
it's
not
really
decentralized
at
all.
G
B
Yeah-
and
that's
I
mean
that's-
why
I
think
we
should
be
using
it
like
almost
on
a
monthly
basis
where
it's
like
we're,
basically
using
it
as
a
way
to
distribute
funds
to
workers,
so
I
I
wouldn't
want
to
be.
I
don't
think
we
should
be
putting
more
money
than
like
a
month's
payroll
in
there.
I
think
to
federico's
point.
B
You
know
this
is.
I
don't
think
this
is
a
long-term
solution,
maybe
effects
I
can
figure
out
how
to
decentralize
quicker,
but
we
need
there
will
be
some.
We
need
to
move
someplace
in
in
terms
and
be
able
to
practice
like
more
like
cheaper
governance,
and
I
think,
if
it's
going
to
cost
25
30
000
like
a
month
just
to
do
payroll,
I
think
we
should
figure
out
like
a
a
quicker
solution
for
that,
that's
more
immediate.
Even
if
it's
not
the
long-term
solution.
F
F
B
B
Well,
so
I
think
there
are
yeah.
I
think
there
are
two
different
ways
to
do.
This
one
would
be
like
specific
amounts
that
go
out
every
month
to
like
a
multi-sig
if
it's
a
squad
multi-stick
if
it's
like
the
developer,
multisig
and
then
that
multisig
is
actually
like
releasing
the
payments
to
the
workers.
I
think
we
still
run
into
like
two
problems:
one,
that's
still
like
kind
of
expensive.
B
If
we're
doing
four,
if
it's
like
four
proposals
a
month
like
you
know,
that's
a
little
bit
less,
but
that's
probably
still
like
three
or
f.
You
know,
I
guess
it's
not
a
thousand
dollars
a
proposal,
but
it's
like
a
little
maybe
like
600,
and
I
think
two
is.
B
What
do
we
do
about
the
individual
worker
proposals
just
in
terms
of
like
updating
and
approving
those,
because
in
this
case
it's
all
be
rolled
into
one,
and
so
that
would
be
like
for
the
payment
but
like
for
a
lot
of
workers
like
we
wanna,
I
think
we
wanna
be
able
to
have
like
different
worker
proposals
that
are
like
approved
and
brought
and
for
brought
forth
to
the
community.
D
Another
not
that
complicated.
I
think
all
these
optimizations
are
like
good,
and
I
support
all
of
this,
but
just
the
other
thing
is
the
payroll
system
is
being
developed
by
blackrock.
I
actually
looked
at
the
you
know.
The
first
draft
of
the
smart
contracts
has
already
been
done
and
we
like
so
another
approach
to
this,
or
I
mean
we
could
do
the
payroll
thing
on.
I
think
it
makes
sense
on
next
night
too,
because
it
actually
makes
the
user
experience
for
the
worker
better.
So
it's
not
like.
D
The
goal
is
to
have
basically
a
multi-call
proposal
like
authorized
workers,
like
you
say
you
know,
chris
is
level
five
working
for
the
next
worker
period
and
it
calls
the
payroll
system
and
the
payroll
system
basically
creates
entries
in
it.
That
says,
like
you,
know,
level
five,
it
checks
what
the
pay
is
and
like
sets
chris
up
for
the
next
couple
of
months
and
also
sets
up
the
vesting
of
the
dxd
and
then,
as
chris.
All
you
really
have
to
do
to
get
paid.
D
Is
you
just
go
to
the
payroll
dap
and
you
click
click
claim
that
that
should
be
it
right,
so
so
even
on
mainnet.
It
helps
us
a
lot
because
creating
one
of
those
entries
is
like
a
200
000
gas
and
it's
going
to
be
paid
by
the
dow
with
the
multi-cal
or
whatever
I
mean
we'll.
D
You
could
do
multiple
at
the
same
time.
So
even
if
we
wanted
to
do
that
on
mainnet,
I
think
it
could
make
sense
to
be
doing
worker
proposals
on
xda
and
let
people
vote
on
it.
There
express
their
opinion
and
then
we
could
pass
one
multi-call
with,
like
all
the
past.
Workers
like
load
them
up
into
the
payroll
system
and
people
could
still
collect
their
pay
directly
on
mainnet
was
still.
E
D
B
Way
we
could
approach
this
yeah
because
no
one
is
like
there's
not
fiat
on
ramps.
Next,
I
don't
think
like
people
are
going
to
have
to
come
back
to
main
net
at
some
point,
so
that
cost
will
that
cause
is
like
a
is
a
standard,
so
if
the
cost
could
be
limited
through
the
payroll
system,
I
think
that
would
make
sense
and
then
just
a
couple
comments
in
the
chat
like
I
think,
arbitrage.
B
You
know
we
could
think
about
that,
and
that
could
maybe
be
something
that
we
work
to
also-
and
you
know,
could
potentially
even
increase
some
of
the
some
of
the
amounts
that
we're
we're
using
for
this,
and
I
think,
like
as
john
was
saying
this
earlier
in
the
week
like
dows,
are
probably
not
made
for
like
layer,
one
right.
B
We
have
to
kind
of
think
about
that
as
like,
the
costs
are
rising,
like
all
these
things,
like
voting,
we're
probably
like
that,
doesn't
make
sense
really
to
have
that
long
term
on
on
on
mainnet,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
think
about
ways
to
scale
that.
So
I
think
this
is
just
the
the
start
and
then
pulp's
question
so
about
rep
yeah.
I
don't
think
we
have
a
precise
answer
yet
I
guess
nylon's
point
about.
Maybe
we
could
do
a
multiple
mint
rep.
B
I
think
for
the
time
being,
I
guess
the
question
is:
should
you
request
any
rep
on
x
die
like
what's,
the
rep
makeup
on
x
die
because
I
think
that
hasn't
been
updated
in
a
couple
weeks
and
then
the
second
question
is,
then:
how
do
we
get
people's
rep
rewards
back
on
mainnet,
and
so
I
I
don't
really
have.
I
don't
know
what
people
thoughts.
B
Yeah-
and
I
think
like
this
is
things
we
can
doc
documenting-
is
just
important
right.
Putting
in
your
worker
proposal
like
even
if
you're
not
requesting
just
like
this
is
the
the
rep
reward.
I'm
thinking
about
this,
actually,
the
dxd
things
too,
like
getting
those
getting
that
just
documented,
so
it's
easier
to
come
back
going
forward.
Obviously
that
requires
a
bit
of
trust
there,
but.
A
D
My
feeling
is
that
they
should
be
allowed
to
diverge,
because
you're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
different
activity
on
different
bases
and
it's
in
the
rep
on
the
main
that
should
be,
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
it
could
get
really
messy
and
you
don't
want
it
to
be
messy.
So
I
think
basically,
maintenance
should
control
win
that
rep
and
if
it
wants
to
like
authorize
certain
things
that
it
will
like
reimburse.
You
know
like
acknowledge,
rep
on
different
bases
as
like
main
net
bases,
then
that's
good,
but
yeah,
I'm
not
sure.
G
Yeah,
so
maybe
just
once
every
quarter
we
could
yeah.
Someone
could
make
a
proposal
or
we
can
discuss
this
of
like
basically
off
chain
on
how
to
reward
the
different
bases
in
the
main
dial
and
then
yeah
once
a
recorder
kind
of
like
add
it
doesn't
it
doesn't
mean
that
we're
syncing
all
the
bases,
but
we
are.
C
The
reverse
direction
is
like
do
we
want
like,
like
today,
the
the
rep
just
the
rep
on
xdx
dial
does
not
line
up
with,
like
even
the
main
net
rep
right.
Do
we
need
to
like
re-update
the
x,
the
xdx
dial
rep
to
current
state
of
mainnet,
or
do
we
just
let
them
diverge
from
the
point
that
it
was
randomly
created
right?
It's.
D
Well,
it
wasn't
randomly
created
right.
Like
I
mean
it
was,
it
was
a
clone
with
signs
yeah
there
was
yeah
yeah
I
mean
I
think
you
kind
of
have
to.
I
think
it's
going
to
become
a
nightmare
to
try
to
like
so-called.
Like
sync
I
mean
we're
already
like
you
said
it's
already
diverged
and
this
is
just
x-time
and
we
haven't
really
done
anything
yet.
Imagine
what
that's
like
when
we
have
arbitrary
xdi
zk
sink
in
like
three
other
chains.
Right,
like
I
mean
forget
it.
C
How
how
are
we
gonna
like
convince?
How
are
we
gonna
continue
main
net
rep
distribution,
which
is
really
important
other
than
very,
like
it's
very
clear
for
workers
like
every
three
months
or
six
months,
a
worker
could
say
I
did
these
six
months,
I'm
requesting
all
the
rep
for
those
six
months.
I
mean
that,
but
like
a
rep
boost,
if
there's
like
little
voting
activity,
only
like
really
big
important
things
on
main
net,
and
but
most
of
the
voting
is
happening
on
on
xdi.
C
B
Think
the
solution
has
to
be
what
nylon
is
saying
before
about
multiple
rep
distribution
of
multiple
addresses,
and
I
I
mean
if
we
have
a
scheme,
if
we
have
something
that
we
can
use
on
that,
I
think
that's
the
solution
to
that,
even
if
it
cost
like
a
lot
of
gas,
because.
G
Yeah,
this
should
be
like
an
event
of
like
we
are
we're.
I
don't
know
we're
doing
like
a
mainnet
distribution
and
then
people
could
come
and
say
you
know
I
did
this.
I
did
that,
and
you
know
we
could,
like
I
don't
know,
maybe
somehow
categorize
it
on
how
much
these
contributions
should
be
getting
on
mainnet
and
then
do
it
like
once
a
quarter
once
every
six
months
or
something.
C
But
you
still
want
addresses
to
basically
like
acknowledge
that
they
want
the
rep
right
like
because
we've
been
hesitant
to
like
push
rep
to
people.
If,
because,
if
something,
if
you
don't
want
rep
you,
maybe
maybe
you
don't
want
it
pushed
to
you,
so
you
have
to
like
somehow
acknowledge
or
claim
it
right.
You.
G
D
D
A
Yeah,
I
agree
like
the
main
issue
is
that
ethereum
minute
is
not
the
right
place
for
the
geek
style,
at
least
the
governance
system?
Is
it's
not
the
right
place,
so
I
think
in
the
next
year.
Hopefully
we
will
find
a
new
like
proper
base
right
like
where
we
actually
can
do
real
governance
and
very
cheap,
and
everyone
can
vote,
and
that
should
be
like
the
new
base
like
the
new
main
base.
But
until
then
we
need
to
survive
via
our
solutions.
We
have
right
now
and
yeah.
A
I
agree
with
john,
like
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
talk
about
like
yeah.
We
have.
We
have
a
huge
buck
with
the
mainnets
okay.
I
should.
I
should
rephrase
that
we
don't
have
a
bug,
but
mainnet
is
not
working
right
now,
so
we
need
an
emergency
solution.
Until
we
get
new
technologies,
we
can
use
to
fix
our
governance.
A
B
So,
just
again,
next
I'll
I'll
write
up
a
dow
talk
post
about
authorization
proposal.
That's
that
kind
of
dictates
that
and
then
I
guess
maybe
separate
from
that.
We
have
like
a
funding
proposal
that
comes
after
that
or
we
could
roll
those
into
two,
but
I'm
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
get
this
on
x
die
before
we
start
seeing
the
worker
proposals
from
like
you
know
the
beginning
of
the
month.
C
A
Also,
I
bet
that
most
workers
like
really
want
to
wait
for
the
extire
approval
right,
because
no
one
wants
to
pay
us
so
much.
D
D
F
F
I
B
Cool
all
right,
I'll
yeah,
hopefully
we'll
get
that
out
in
the
next
dial
talk
post
I'll,
try
to
get
that
out
today
actually
cool
and
then
I
wanted
to
move
and
talk
about
governance,
2.0
signal
proposal.
So
we've
had
some
discussion
in
the
in
the
forum
about
this.
So
there's
kind
of
been
a
couple
different
things
since
we
last
spoke,
I'm
just
going
to
go
over
a
couple
of
things
that
I
think
are
changes
or
things
we're
going
to
include
from
the
original
text.
B
So
one
I
think
we're
on
pretty
wide
consensus
on
the
rep
in
the
voting
power
equation,
the
rep
influence
and
dxd
influence
both
at
fifty
percent.
So
we'll
we'll
change
that
and
move
that
in
there
two.
I
wanted
to
introduce
something
like
overall
max
and
so
the
new
voting.
The
new
voting
power
equation
has
a
rep
max
and
a
dxd
max
that
are
they're
both
adjustable
by
governance,
but
there's
not
necessarily
that
accounts
for
something.
That's
like
an
overall
influence.
B
It's
really
hard
to
calculate
this
because
it
depends
on
how
much
dxd
is
staked
in
the
governance
system,
but
I
just
want
to
put
some
language
in
there.
You
can
check
in
the
thread
that's
just
like.
B
We
can
have
maybe
an
overall
max
if
needed,
to
to
do
that
and
then
yeah
like
the
then
there's
a
language
that
I
wanted
to
add
to
the
bottom
of
the
proposal.
That
is
basically
saying
I'll.
Just
read
it.
The
signal
proposal
encapsulates
the
overall
structure
and
design
of
a
new
governance
system
for
geek
style
that
sustainably
intertwines,
rep
and
dxd.
B
Implementation
of
this
proposal
will
require
additional
technical
details
that
are
unknown
and
outside
of
the
purview
of
this
proposal.
This
flexibility
will
allow
the
new
system
to
account
for
unforeseen
developments,
but
the
implementation
process
should
abide
by
the
text
and
spirit
of
this
proposal
to
the
extent
possible.
So
that's
just
trying
to
like
you
know
when
we
get
to
implementing
this,
it's
going
to
be
a
whole
different
ballgame.
B
So
we
want
to
have
that
like
tight,
but
also
there,
and
so
there's
that
and
then
the
kind
of
two
other
things
or
maybe
the
thing
that
there
was
such
some
discussion
on
is
the
future
dxd
distribution
to
rep
holders.
So
this
is
part
of
the
migration
process
right
so
the
to
give
or
have
some
rep
inflation
that
goes
to
dxd
holders
and
then
also
for
rep
holders
to
approve
to
also
have
some
vested
dxd
that's
distributed.
B
B
B
And
then
we
want
to
say
that
only
rep
holders
that
are
like
have
participated
in
geek
style.
Governance
are
eligible
and
we
can
get
into
maybe
like
the
specifics
of
what
this
actually
means
on
whether
that
means
like
have
you
ever
voted
and
if,
like
you've,
just
voted
once.
Does
that
mean
that
and
then
like?
B
The
last
thing
is,
I
think,
in
this
language,
have
the
dxd
will
be
vested
for
three
years
from
when
this
signal
from
sorry
three
years
from
when
the
governance
2.0
system
is
implemented
and
the
vesting
contract
should
retain
the
ability
to
revoke
dxd
distribution
to
addresses
that
don't
act
in
accordance
with
dxdaw's
best
interest,
just
introducing
some
like
slash
ability
to
that.
Okay,
so
I
said
kind
of
a
lot
there.
I
don't
know
if
people
have
thoughts,
probably
the
most
contentious
one
that
maybe
we're
discussing
is
around.
D
I
have
some
thoughts
on
in
terms
of
like
giving
it
out
to
get
the
dxc
distribution
to
rep
holders
in
terms
of
like
what
is
an
active
rep
holder,
I
think,
as
pope
has
pointed
out
in
the
forum
a
couple
of
times
right.
A
lot
of
people
haven't
actually,
but
a
lot
of
rap
addresses
haven't
voted.
D
I
don't
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
be
giving
out
dxd
to
inactive
rap
addresses
that
may
not
even
be
paying
any
attention.
They
have
probably
haven't
done
anything
right
so
like.
Why
would
you
reward
that?
I
think
giving
them
some
opportunity
to
come
alive
in
the
next
six
months?
Is
a
good
idea
like
in
rewarding
that,
but
then
yeah,
I
don't
know
exactly
how
to
do
it.
I
have
some
thoughts,
but
I
was
kind
of
curious
what
other
people
were
thinking.
H
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
makes
sense
and
it
seemed
like
the
the
dxd
holders
that
were
at
most
issue
with
the
dxd
distribution
also
agreed
with
that.
So
you
know
as
long
as
there's
not
more
pushback
on
that.
Maybe
it's
just
about
structuring
notice,
giving
notice
to
the
dormant
rep
holders
and
see
what
happens
in
the
next
six
months.
B
Yeah-
and
I
guess
there's
like
thinking
about
this-
I
think
was
two
levels:
we're
thinking
about
this
right-
that
I
think
there's
like
a
lot
of
very,
very
small
rep
holders
that
we
want
to
like
incentivize
to
participate,
and
I
said
this
in
in
the
post.
B
You
know,
I
think
the
distribution
of
rep
in
may
and
june
of
2019
is
a
very
underrated
cohort
right
thinking
about,
like
the
the
ethereum
addresses
that
got
wrapped
there,
there's
probably
a
lot
of
people
that
have
stayed
in
ethereum
and
are
like
doing
great
things.
B
So
if
we
can
figure
out
how
to
maybe
kind
of
re-engage
with
them,
so
I
think
that
we
should
think
about
some
like
minimum
amount
for
very,
very
small
rep
holders,
and
so
it's
not
just
like
proportional
base,
and
so
those
would
be
people
that
would
just
like.
Maybe
they
are
just
like
voting
or
participating
in
the
first
time,
but
like
they're,
not
it's
not
necessarily
like
a
percentage
of
their
overall
rep
there's
like
some
minimum
and
then
the
second
concern
is
on
larger
rep
holders
that
have
never
voted.
B
So
I
think,
there's
a
couple
that
have
you
know,
there's
like
two
in
the
top
ten
that
have
never
participated
in
voting
like
I
don't
you
know
if
if
they
vote
and
then
suddenly
they
get
like
a
bunch
of
dxd
with
their
because
they
had
like
a
lot
of
rep,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
like
safe,
so
I
yeah
just
a
challenge.
I
think,
to
account
for
both
of
those
extremes.
D
On
the
minimum
or
the
incentive
for
small
people
who
you
know
small
breath,
holders
that
have
never
voted
yeah,
some
kind
of
a
minimum
like
one
two
dxd
for
any
address
that
has
voted
by
the
end
of
like
you
know,
the
six
months
when
the
snapshot
is
taken.
That
could
be
like
one
stipulation
and
then
nothing
for
addresses
that
have
just
like.
If
it's
the
end
of
six
months
and
the
address
has
done
nothing,
then
I
think
they,
it
simply
cut
them
out
right.
There's,
no,
no
response,
nylon's
asking
about
x-9
arbitrary!
D
B
D
D
H
D
B
Or
I
think,
like
all
rep
distributions
over
the
next
six
months,
like
I
mean
we
should
have
lots
of,
we've
had
rep
boost
and
people
are
like,
probably
not
claiming
them,
because
it's
difficult
and
it's
expensive
to
do
that
if
we
have
new
workers
or
like
people
that
are
like,
I
don't
know
how
much
rep
distribution
we're
going
to
do
on
mainnet
like
consistently,
especially
if
we're
doing
it
like
once
a
quarter
or
something
like
that.
B
C
Months,
there's
also
this
process,
though,
of
a
lot
of
people
with
the
safe
wallets
that
have
to
map
their
rep
right.
So,
if
yeah,
a
lot
of
like
that's
a
big
obstacle,
you
have
to
map
your
rep
to
x
die
before
you
can
then
do
something
on
x,
dive
for
quite
a
few
people,
which
is
a
barrier
that's
going
to
keep
a
lot
of
people
out.
I
think.
H
H
H
B
Yeah,
it's
not,
and
I
think
that
represents
like
70
of
rep
right,
and
so
there
are
a
lot
of
the
the
smaller
yeah
and
then
it's
just
an
opportunity
to
reengage
them.
So
I
think
there's
like
it
re-engage
them.
I
think
there's
like
two
incentives
here
that
we're
trying
to
do
like
one
is
like
the
the
short
term,
which
is
like
get
people
to
participate
and
dx
out
governance
over
the
next
six
months.
B
Like
things
are
happening,
just
kind
of
pay
attention
vote
do
that
and
whether
that's
for
older
rep
holders
or
people
that
have
like
not
claimed
their
rep
boost
right.
How
do
they
kind
of
go
about
doing
that
or
people
that
you
know
are
just
wanting
to
to
get
involved?
So
that's
one
and
then
the
second
one
is
on
like
the
long-term
alignment
here
of
that
cohort
of
rep
holders
and
like
making
sure
that
they
are
invested
in
incentivized
into
deep
style
long
term.
H
Right
and
then
I
think,
john
started
kind
of
touching
on
it,
but
the
idea
of
like
how
we
distribute
and
how
much
dxd
we
distribute
are.
We
are
we,
I
I'm
actually,
it
seems
like
there's
some
pushback
from
the
dxd
holders
about
oh
20
percent
of
circulating
supply.
I
know
there's
some
back
and
forth
about
that.
But
if
we
are,
you
know
cutting
out,
you
know
it's
not
gonna
be
450
addresses
that
are
going
to
get
some
sort
of.
You
know.
H
Dxd
drop,
it's
going
to
be
right,
like
maybe
a
quarter,
maybe
35
40
of
addresses.
Do
we
still
think
10
1000
dxd
makes
sense
if
we're
going
to
be
diluting,
circulating
supply
or
does
it
more
is
that
is?
Are
we
are
we
set
on
that
or
do
we
need
to
like
look
at
the
numbers
a
little
bit
more
closely?
I
know
it's
also
going
to
like
everything's
going
to
change
with
with
the
buyback
and
stuff
about
what
actually
is
circulating
supply,
but
just
wondering
what
people's
thoughts
are.
D
D
I
don't
know,
obviously,
that
I'm
sort
of
speaking
against
my
own
interests
by
saying
that,
because,
as
like
a
large
red
holder
like
it
would
help
if,
if
it
was
stated,
10
000,
but
I
think
it
might
make
more
sense
to
kind
of
just
leave
it
as
the
reference,
if
all
active
rep,
if
all
rep
was
active
and
participating
and
then
kind
of
tear
down
from
there.
E
I
agree
with
that
and
I
think
it
it
shows
good
intention
to
the
the
committee
members
that
are
concerned
with
the
initiative.
B
And
then
the
other
thing
that
was
brought
up,
which
would
was,
I
think,
mad
max-
would
be
whether
this
the
snapshot
would
include
rep
distributed
to
dxt
holders
in
the
like
rep
inflation
initiative.
B
So
I
think
originally
we
had
not
included
that
and
I
don't
know,
but
I
think
that's
like
another
thing
in
terms
of
like
the
to
play
with
from
from
pulp,
if
we
wanted
to
to
do
that,
I
think
that's
like
another
that'll
be
a
complicated
thing
itself,
so
I
don't
know
yeah
how
we'd
implement
that.
But
that
would
be
another.