►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #9 [2019/04/02]
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/PM/issues/23
B
D
B
B
B
B
All
right.
Oh
great,
first
agenda.
Item
update
on
the
progress
there
are
some
new
promising
leads
for
money
and
me
and
Charles
the
other
day
were
chatting
back
and
forth,
and
he
mentioned
that.
We
should
update
the
community
on
this
and
I
agree
with
him
I'm
trying
to
find
the
right
timing
for
that.
It's
gonna
be
before
the
end
of
the
week,
I
think
because
I
don't
want
to
put
out
something,
and
then
we
suddenly
have
new
information,
so
I'm
trying
to
find
just
the
sweet
spot
of
time.
A
B
F
I
think
I
understand
the
math,
but
I
don't
I,
don't
know
offhand
the
number
that
60
K
sounds
about
right.
It's
on
that
order
of
magnitude,
so
yeah
I
don't
think
that
there's
any
way
that
any
particular
projects
didn't
get
that
much.
That's
probably
the
amount
maximum
amount
matching
was
offered
I
see
what
they
have
I
mean.
There's
a
blog
post
on
kick
point
about
this,
so
it
should
be
pretty
easy
to
check.
Okay.
A
G
One
quick
one
is
I
think
there
was
some
confusion
by
people
around
like
the
fact
that
the
audit
was
only
50,
J.
I
sorry
did
the
the
grant
was
only
50
K,
but
the
audit
would
cost
more
than
that.
So
I
think
if
we're
issuing
a
clarification
and
be
good
to
just
like
explain,
you
know
that
breakdown
and
like
the
fact
that
we're
looking
for
funds
from
other
parties
to
pay
for
whatever
the
difference
is
and
to
give
people
like
a
feeling
of,
like
you
know
the
like
relative
to
the
grant.
G
B
E
A
F
C
G
Just
said,
it
should
probably
be
after
if
it's
during
the
burnin
me
that
that's
fine
as
well,
but
just
that
probably
not
before
then,
given
that
there's
probably
going
to
be
some
changes,
decided
I
like
during
those
meetings
and
am
I
just
like.
If
we
do
like
three
months
hard
Forks
and
we
change
the
whole
Istanbul
schedule,
then
you
know
God
will
have
it
all
the
consequences
on
the
coordination,
so
it
doesn't
seem
like
before
then
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
questions
that
get
answered.
So
that
was
just
kind
of
my
point.
A
A
B
Yes,
it'll
depend
on
how
quickly
we
can
get
things
together.
It
might
be
after
Istanbul
it
might
not
yeah
so
yeah
still
up
in
the
air.
That's
a
good!
That's
a
good
reason
to
have
this
during
or
after
the
Berlin
meeting,
but
to
have
at
least
one
cat
hurt
or
involved
in
those
discussions
so
that
week
they
can
come
back
and
say
here's
what
people
have
been
talking
about
and
get
the
feel
for
what
people
want,
or
what
the
core
Deb's
and
others
want.
No.
B
A
B
B
E
A
That's
stable
enough
before
they'd
own,
their
own
clients
test
neck
rather
than
having
a
multi
one
before
so
they
said
we
we've
got
to
jump
through
a
couple
of
Hoops
before
get
to
multiply,
and
so
we
will
just
hold
off
on
that
for
the
time
being.
But
that
said,
I
think
there
is
still
somebody
that
the
theorem
cat
herders
could
potentially
assist
with
specifically
around
which
versions
the
clients
are
working
on
and
in
half
are
ahead.
B
A
Hugo
will
be
checking
the
website
in
his
spare.
Time
is
what
I've
got
from
Charles
and
he
also
mentions
that
Greg
from
China.
This
was
going
back
very
quick
to
earth
to
coordination.
Help
from
China
safe
who
works
with
McAra
says
he
would
love
to
connect
with
us
for
our
the
cat
herders
up
with
2.0
cool.
B
A
F
That's
hard
to
say:
I
mean
generally
with
these
events.
We
push
it
back
a
week
and
especially
because
this
one's
in
Australia,
so
it's
gonna,
be
like
middle
of
the
night
for
everyone,
I
guess.
The
question
is
like
how
many
of
the
regular
participants
are
gonna,
be
ed,
Khan
I
think
it
might
actually
not
be
that
high,
because
it's
so
far
that's
kind
of
the
question.
In
my
mind,
yeah.
G
Would
it
maybe
make
sense
to
have
it
on
an
Australian
time
zone
and
I?
Guess
I'm
saying
this
like
half
of
our
team
is
in
Australia
and
they
don't
attend
the
Chordettes
call,
because
of
that.
So,
given
that
there's
gonna
be
more
of
like
people,
there,
then
maybe
changing
the
time.
Usually
like
end
of
the
day.
Est
Americas
is
like
a
good
time
for
Australia,
so
it
might
allow
different
people
also
from
Asia
to
jump
in
who
otherwise,
wouldn't
that's.
B
F
Well,
it's
so
hard
to
say
you
know,
on
the
one
hand,
like
I
believe
in
being
equal
opportunity
and
I
would
actually
go
even
a
step
further
and
say
we
should
just
rotate
the
time
by
like
four
hours.
Every
call
you
know
so,
like
everyone
gets,
you
know
like
screwed
some
time
and
everyone's
like
gets
a
good
time
at
other
times,
but
I
really
think
the
price
we
pay
there
is
greater
because,
like
just
having
a
regular
fixed
time
on
the
calendar
means
everyone
just
knows
it's
going
to
happen
at
that
time.
F
F
Hudson,
even
even
like
you
know
this
week,
you
know
the
Europe
times,
I'm
shifted
again
and
it's
so
chipped
it
for
Americans
and
stuff.
Every
time
that
happens,
we
have
people
that
missed
calls
like
you
and
I
are
guilty
of
this
as
well.
Sometimes,
I
just
feel
like
moving
things
is
gonna,
create
more
chaos
than
value
yeah.
B
F
The
only
hard
part
is
the
streaming
part
that
part
can
actually
be
like
full
disclosure,
the
first
time
first,
three
times
I
did
it.
It
was
like
terrifying
because
you're
juggling
all
these
like
sound
settings
and
stuff,
so
Hudson
I'm
wondering
maybe
the
right
thing
to
do
here
would
be
to
ask
like
live
here
or
someone
to
come
on
and
like
handle.
The
streaming
parts
at
10:00
doesn't
have
to
worry
about
that.
B
F
Have
a
little
bit
of
a
sense
I
might
be
wrong
that,
like
people
are
gonna
freak
out.
If
because
because
they're
all
streamed
right,
if
like
suddenly
one
of
them
is
not
streamed
but
yeah
I,
don't
know.
Maybe
it's
not
such
a
big
deal,
maybe
it
maybe
we
should
try
once
and
see
if
anyone
cares,
if
anyone
notices
yeah.
B
G
B
Cool
we'll
talk
more
about
that
later,
I'll
think
about
that
a
little
bit
more
cuz.
It
might
not
I
mean
and
I.
The
other
reason
I
wouldn't
want
to
want
you
to
go
through
the
trouble
of
streaming.
It
is
if
there's
not
going
to
be
as
many
people
on
the
call
and
it's
gonna
be
a
real,
quick
call
to
run
through
anyway
and
might
not
even
might
not
even
be
worth
it
so
yeah
I
will
talk
to
you
more
about
that
off
the
call
good
great
so
we're
just
running
through
hey
Charles
yeah.
B
D
Sure
so
for
the
four
small
room,
I
started
two
of
them,
don't
believe
which
ones
that
put
in
variant
in
progress
board,
probably
following
up
with
people
this
week
and
putting
some
stuff
together
after
the
developer
portal,
I
was
speaking
with
Anthony
from
each
hub,
as
he
was
quite
interested
and
proposing
that
to
be
funded
by
a
Moloch
or
some
sort
of
thing.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
are
interested
in
general
and
we're
gonna
speak
about
that
together
and
show
them
what
I
have
and
other
ideas
in
place.
D
I
think
lane
lanes
looked
at
it
briefly
and
I've
asked
Jamie
Pitts
to
look
at
it
as
well,
so
the
overall
conflict.
There,
though,
is
if
it's
going
to
be
a
part
of
the
actual
aetherium
dot
or
website
in
the
redesign
there
I
think
we
covered
that
last
time,
so
you
wouldn't
obviously
be
ideal
for
a
repeating
content
and
doing
all
that
so
finding
some
time
to
chat
about
that
would
be
helpful.
D
F
Just
a
quick
thought:
I
don't
worry
about
the
etherion
better
work
stuff
like
ok,
I
have
no
idea.
What's
going
on
there.
No
one
seems
to
want
to
offer
any
information
on
that.
I
really
think
that,
like
in
any
way
shape
or
form
like,
depending
on
that's,
probably
a
mistake,
and
it's
like
the
reason
that
if
they're
in
metalwork
hasn't
been
updated
in
three
years
so
like
I,
think
we
should
just
press
forward
and
you
know
kind
of
cross
that
bridge
when
we
get
there.
Okay,.
A
D
A
Yeah
it
you
know
just
just
with
regards
to
coordination.
They
basically
said
that
at
this
stage
a
multi
clients,
taste
nate,
is
not
really
required.
I'm
first
get
the
individual
test
needs
for
the
arm
and
then
once
that's
all
set
up,
then
we
can
perhaps
start
looking
at
multi
client,
but
it's
still
a
little
ways
off
there.
They
feel
and
they
want
to
testing
on
them
all
on
their
individual
clients.
Obviously
before
they
could
say.
A
Yes,
it's
running
them,
it's
all
sweet,
but
I
was
saying
that
they
might
still
be
somebody
that
we
could
add
to
theory
and
to
point
Sarah
in
the
sense
that
at
the
moment,
no,
he
really
has
a
single
source
that
they
could
look
at
and
say
these
are
what
all
the
clients
are
running
on
and
I
basically
have
the
tick
box
aside.
We're
here
we're
here
we're
here
over
here,
so
we
may
be
able
to
see
something
like
that
that
could
help
them.
B
B
It
still
needs
to
be
done.
Yeah,
six
point:
seven
yeah,
Hugo
and
Joseph
to
work
together
to
write
up
a
general
overview
of
how
Moloch
down
might
benefit
the
etherium
community
us
to
do
Hudson
to
provide
feedback
on
hard
for
coordinators,
yet
to
do
cat
herders
to
look
at
handbook
proposed
by
Luke's
shown
and
discuss
over
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
I
actually
have
never
looked
at
that
and
I
thought
I
thought
I
had,
but
I
hadn't
ever
clicked
on
it.
Oh,
this
is
neat.
A
He's
put
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
into
it's
probably
worth
just
having
a
look
through
it
and
see
what
we
want
to
include.
It's
probably
a
little
bit
more
detailed
and
specific
to
a
specific
project
rather
than
a
generalization
of
the
cat
herders,
but
it's
certainly
got
some
good
stuff
there.
Oh
yeah.
G
B
E
E
F
F
A
F
B
Let's
finish
the
action
items,
that's
a
good
idea,
so
8.5
makiura
to
bring
the
idea
to
assist,
coordinating
task
to
the
8th
room,
2.0
call
and
we'll
provide
feedback.
Next
meeting
yeah.
That
already
happened
because
makiura
brought
that
up
and
then
they
decided
to
not
have
us
come
on
fully
for
the
moment.
B
E
A
process
part
the
helpful
coordination
process
pocket
sorry
I'm
a
little
late
on
that,
but
would
it
be
good
enough
to
have
a
process
set
up
irrespective
of
the
time
and
period?
Is
such
a
thing
like?
If
the
codecs
decide
it
has
to
be
three
months,
hon
folk
or
if
they
decide
to
six
to
nine
months,
whatever
it?
If
what
we
can
probably
come
up
with
the
process,
parts
like
as
I
discussed
in
the
last
call
like
we
should
go
ahead
and
submit
aap
for
consideration
pick
up
somewhere.
E
E
B
F
Got
to
go
in
60
seconds,
I
just
realized
I
have
another
call
but
I'll.
Just
if
it's
okay,
just
very
very
briefly
share
my
kind
of
concerns
about
the
multi-sig.
Can
we
do
do
that
super
quickly
right
now,
yeah
go
ahead
yeah,
so
it's
just
the
following
right,
like
I've,
been
saying
all
along:
let's
not
get
hung
up
on
this.
F
Is
always
a
possibility
and
I
just
like
I,
just
try
to
be
like
ultra
aboveboard
on
this
stuff?
So
we're
not
gonna
solve
it
right
at
this
moment,
but
like
one
easy
thing
we
could
do
here
is
just
bump
it
up
to
a
two
of
three
right,
so
any
transaction
requires
two
of
us.
I
also
think.
Another
thing
we
might
consider
doing
is
moving
the
prague
power
funds
into
a
separate
multi-sig,
which
just
makes
our
counting
simpler,
because
right
now
they're
all
like
intermingled.
You
know
what
I
mean
with
our
regular
ongoing
funding.