►
From YouTube: Ethereum Cat Herders Meeting #8
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/PM/issues/16
A
So
the
Prague
pal
update
what
we
have
is
we
released
on
Monday,
a
blog
post,
that
kind
of
gave
an
overview
of
why
we're
doing
the
Prague
Pal
audit.
It
gave
some
links
to
some
surveys
and
interviews
we
gave
on
basically
from
some
prague
house
stakeholders,
it
showed
the
coin
vote
and
the
hash
vote
and
then
explained
the
audit
and
how
we're
fundraising
for
it.
So
we
are
fundraising
through
a
git
coin,
bounty
for
some
community
support,
but
we're
also
talking
to
some
major
organizations
how
that's
going
right.
A
C
B
C
Yep,
just
a
quick
one
before
we
go
there,
just
a
quick
update.
The
the
fundraising
link
that
we
gave
through
for
white
block
in
the
last
meeting
is
incorrect.
That
has
been
updated
in
the
agenda
or
in
the
action
items
or
at
least
comments
in
the
agenda.
So
that's
the
correct,
fundraising
address,
also
just
with
regards
to
the
Prague
power
being
tentatively
included
in
the
Istanbul
fork.
Just
from
the
meeting,
we
have
some
final
clarification
where
we
landed
with
that
from
the
core
developers
meeting.
B
Yes,
like
overwhelmingly,
there's
been
like
a
hundred
percent
vote
for
Prague
POW
and
something
like
seventy
percent
of
minor
turnout,
I
think
but
then
the
rest
of
the
community,
who
aren't
miners
so
in
honor,
my
application
developers
and
whatnot
seem
to
be
a
follows
to
profile
for
a
bunch
of
various
reasons,
and
it
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
clear
way
to
reconcile
these.
So
some
people
have
suggested
doing
some
like
community
calls
to
talk
about
it.
There's
been
a
whole
bunch
of
threads
on
like
Twitter
and
eath
magicians
and
get
her
about
it.
D
This
isn't
the
time
or
the
place
to
discuss
this
I
mean
just
sort
of
something.
That's
I
guess
bothering
me
a
bit
is
in
a
decentralized
process.
What
does
a
decision?
Look
like
anyway,
I
mean
one
of
the
things
I'm
sort
of
confused
by
the
crowd
from
the
crowd
here
is
I'm
not
ever
really
clear.
When
I'm
looking
at
the
naysayers
about
what
they
would
rather
see
happen,
I
mean
right
now,
there's
information
out
there.
There
are
signals
out
there
there's
data
out
there.
The
only
thing
that
looks
like
it
could
happen.
A
I
am
too,
but
one
thing
that
I
I
did
see
as
a
valid
point
was
that
the
naysayers
said
that
they
didn't
have
a
clear
picture
of
why
we
needed
it,
and
that's
also
something
that
I
have
kind
of
seen.
I
guess
it
just
depends
on
where
you
land
on
a
6/10
realisation,
so
I
think
that
yeah,
so
I
guess
I'm
not
exactly
sure
where
everyone's
landing
on
that,
but
hopefully
after
the
audit,
we
can
continue
to
discuss
it
as
kind
of
what
people
are
saying.
A
A
B
A
F
This
one's
mine-
let
me
just
give
a
little
bit
of
a
tiny
bit
of
background
here,
just
to
recap
how
this
happened.
In
the
first
place
there
was
an
anonymous
community
member
who
requested
that
this
happened
and
offered
a
bounty
for
it.
So
it
wasn't
really
a
cat
herders
initiative,
strictly
speaking,
but
I
sort
of
have
it
on
the
agenda
here,
because
it
kind
of
falls
under
the
broader
heading
of
you
know,
kind
of
gauging
the
sentiment
of
the
community
for
Prague
POW
anyway.
F
So
a
few
things
have
happened
right
as,
as
you
guys
mentioned
earlier,
it's
been
up
for
I.
Think
close
to
two
months
now.
You
know
many
people
have
had
the
opportunity
to
vote
on
it.
We
have
I,
haven't
looked
at
in
the
past
few
days,
but
last
I
saw
it
was
something
like
three
million
either
so
I
mean
you
know
it's
it's.
It's
still
a
small
amount
percentage-wise,
but
it's
in
absolute
terms,
I
think
that
that's
a
decent
amount
of
signaling
that's
happened.
F
F
Another
reason
is
that,
in
order
to
vote
in
a
carbon
vote,
I
think
people
who
have
their
ether
in
certain
places
like
on
exchanges
actually
need
to
move
it
off
the
exchange
to
vote,
and
so
it
would
kind
of
be
night
and
I
have
to
keep
it
there
as
well,
because
if
they
were
to
move
it
back
and
then
their
vote
would
be
removed,
that's
the
way
carbon
vote
works
so
anyway.
What
guess?
What
I'm
saying?
Is
it's
been
long
enough?
F
We
should
let
people
move
their
ether
back
to
wherever
they
want
it
to
be
shut.
The
thing
down
the
donor,
who
asked
it
to
be
set
up
in
the
first
place,
also
wants
it
to
be
taken
down.
However,
we
do
need
to
make
an
announcement
about
this
and
give
people
something
like
two
three
four
weeks
to
get
their
final
votes
in
before
we
do
that.
So
that's
the
back
story.
C
B
Various
platforms
like
Twitter
reddit,
eath,
magicians,
github
in
a
chat
or
a
so
that
it's
just
clear
that
this
is
being
shut
down
and
out.
If
people,
maybe
we
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
like
agree
on
a
specific
block
for
a
snapshot
or
something
like
that
for
the
final
vote,
or
a
time
when
it'll
be
last
counted,
I
was
trying
you
get
that.
C
A
A
I
haven't
made
much
movement
on
that
because
of
the
prog
Powe
stuff,
so
I
don't
really
have
an
update
except
to
say
that
was
something
where
I
know.
Joe
had
volunteered
and
Dean
had
volunteered
and
then
I
think
a
few
other
people
had
said
they
can
step
up
if
need
be,
and
so
that's
just
kind
of
hanging
out
there
for
now.
B
So
pooja,
do
you
mean,
like
the
EIP
one
thing,
I
sent
you
and
okay,
so
maybe
I
can
give
an
update
there,
but
Boris
has
been
working
with
Alexa
to
submit
a
PR
to
the
meta.
Eeap's
templates
he's
talked
about
this
before
so
that
the
meta
efore
hard
fork
would
linked
the
eeap's
better
suggested
and
accepted
for
this
hard
fork
and
maybe
I
can
find
a
PR
and
post
it
in
our
catheters
dinner
or
afterwards.
I.
Don't
have
it
handy?
B
First
Pacific
hardcore
can't
say:
I'd
like
this
to
be
included
there.
One
tiny
thing
that
I
did
was
just
go
over
the
f1
definitions,
where
there
were
like
conflicting
definitions
of
what
it
meant
for
an
EP
to
be
accepted,
so
I
have
a
small
PR
open
there
and
to
just
try
and
harmonize
those
definitions
so
that
they're
consistent
at
least
across,
like
that
single
document
and
Boris,
wanted
to
start
working
on
a
way
to
just
better
describe
the
process
around
creating
and
submitting
an
EP.
B
So
right
now
the
f1
document
is
like
a
pretty
good
resource
on
the
technical
side.
But
it's
quite
vague
in
terms
of
how
do
you
get
like
community
buy-in
or
people
to
look
at
your
EEP?
So
we're
not
sure
how
to
do
that.
Maybe
it's
just
like
updating
to
read
me
of
the
heaps
document
or
the
front
page
of
like
each
side,
Assyrian
org
they're,
both
kind
of
similar
right
now,
but
most
like
a
direct
copy
of
each
other.
A
One
thing
I'd
like
to
say
about
changes
to
e
IP,
one
that
requires
a
pull
request
and
approval
from
the
EIP
editors,
and
that
usually
happens
after
community
comment.
So
we
will
need
to
kind
of
advertise
that
we're
trying
to
make
changes
to
e
IP
one.
The
last
time
we
did
this.
It
was
really
difficult,
as
there
was
a
lot
of
conflicting
opinions
on
it,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
doing
this
and
it
seemed
like
we're
trying
to
do
this
surreptitiously.
E
P.M.
I
think
I
still
do
not
have
access
to
much
so
I
did
not
do
that,
but
that
is
regarding
the
readme
update
where
I
mentioned
life
comes
how
we
can
go
ahead
and
help
in
planning
and
coordination
thing.
My
question
as
well
as
suggestion
was
the
question
is
I
mean
the
role
that
do
we
as
a
catted
are
going
to
play
over
there
for
the
particular
heart
for
coordination
like
for
this.
E
Taking
here
is
like
we
need
to
collect
the
EITS
that
needs
to
be
considered.
As
for
the
discussion
of
Horus
and
the
last
chord
F
called,
he
is
suggesting
a
way
that
we
should
be
submitting
the
PRS
for
the
EIP
to
be
considered
in
this
particular
hard
book,
and
if
we
can
do
that
in
the
github,
where
we
submit
all
be
e
ID
saying
that
e.
E
F
E
I
think
I've
also
created
a
list
of
peers,
a
list
of
EITS
those
are
available
on
github
and
etherium
magician
and
other
forums
for
this
Istanbul,
and
now
we
can
like
at
address,
can
manage
that
I
am
I'm
ready
to
do
that.
If
this
is
acceptable
manage
the
list
over
there,
you
can
keep
on
updating
the
list
as
we
go
like
first,
the
proposals
will
be
selected.
Put
it
in
a
place
saying
that
these
are
the
proposed
one.
Take
it
to
the
meeting
I
mean
to
the
coders.
E
If
they
accept
it,
we
can
change
it
like
under
discussion.
If
it
is
ready,
we
can
change
it
to
accepted
and
done
for
the
time.
So
first
thing
I
would
request.
Is
somebody
should
please
look
into
the
political
that
I
have
a
turn
and
merge
it?
That
would
give
a
rough
idea
how
we
can
do
that,
and
second
second
thing
about
this
tracker:
the
IB
tracker
to
be
considered.
I
have
created
it
and
I
will
send
it
as
soon
as
possible.
E
Go
so
does
this
sound
reasonable
likely
as
a
cat
herders
sure
to
go
ahead
and
maintain
this
tracker,
so
that
people
should
get
one
place
to
look
into
like
which
yetis
are
being
considered
and
when,
if
they
want
to
submit
the
IP
for
consideration,
they
can
go
ahead
and
submit
an
EIP
at
github.
Just
mentioned
that
50
IPS
should
is
for
consideration,
for
Istanbul
will
pick
up
the
IP
from
there
and
take
it
further
to
the
kunais.
E
A
E
B
So
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense,
and
this
is
kind
of
what
Boris
is
open.
Pull
request
is
about
I.
Think
the
other
thing
you
mentioned
with
the
tracker
puja.
What
would
be
valuable
in
the
tracker
is
also
tracking
up
on
a
per
clients
basis
right,
so
that
the
mela
April
just
track,
which
eeap's
are
at
which
stage
and
then
the
tracker
will
tell
you
which
clients
have
actually
implemented
it
once
it's
been
agreed
upon.
So
this
way
we
know
if
we're
ready
for
for
the
hard
fork.
E
So
that
we
should
know
that
is
actually
going
to
be
considered,
for
example,
hard
phone
and
once
it
is
ready,
then
there
is
another
declined
packet
that
has
been
created
by
Boris,
where
it
will
mention
like
which
client
has
already
implemented
that
and
what
is
the
status
of
each
and
every
client.
So
it
has
to
be
in
two
parts.
One
part
did
which
he
kept
it
on.
The
bikini
gives
it
a
really
key
another,
the
first
tracker
for
the
consideration.
We
will
keep
it.
E
B
You
and
I
think
having
specific
Lynch
would
be
valuable.
The
only
thing
I'm
concerned
about
is,
we
don't
want
to
duplicate.
If
we're
tracking
the
eeap's
in
the
meta
EEP
associated
with
the
hard
fork,
we
don't
necessarily
want
to
duplicate
that
somewhere
else.
We
just
want
it
to
be
clear
for
people
how
they
can
signal
so
just
having
like
specific
links,
maybe
and
like
what
the
purpose
of
them
would
be,
that
that
would
be
really
valuable.
Yes,.
E
A
B
B
B
Look
first,
who
John
Stephens
had
given
like
some
feedback
on
it.
I
had
a
quick
look
saying
that
it
was
quite
long
and
it
seemed
like
a
bit
of
overkill
for
what
we're
doing
yet
cat
herders,
and
maybe,
if
we
could
extract
like
whatever
the
most
important
parts
were,
it
could
help
define
them.
I,
don't
think
kids
on
the
call
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
had
anything.
They
wanted
to
add
about
this.
E
It's
not
the
entire
process,
but
this
is
going
to
give
a
brief
idea
of
what
task
that
we
are
doing
and
who
we
should
reach
out
to
for
that
particular
task.
This
may
not
be
the
most
updated
list.
We
can
update
that,
but
this
would
probably
help
community
know
what
we
are
doing
on
how
we
should
take
it
ahead.
I'm
everybody's
feedback
on
it.
Oh.
C
C
C
Rather
than
one
when
X,
it
should
be
for
etherium
and
here's
also,
as
you
may,
engine
turn
quite
rigid
in
its
application,
whereas
there's
multiple
tasks
rather
than
one
specific.
If
they're
in
one
point
next
task,
it
is
worth
people
having
a
look
at
Luke's
work.
If
you
haven't
already
just
to
review
it
I
think
it's
probably
a
little
bit
too
detailed
for
us,
but
might
be
with
taking
some
of
that
stuff
and
pushing
that
out
a
little
bit
better,
potentially
around
the
ERP
process,
going
forward.
C
B
F
F
Chris
sorry,
cool
Chris
is
also
not
on
the
call.
Okay
just
wanted
to
let
people
know
that
happened.
It's
all
been
documented.
Everything
in
that
Dow.
This
is
on
meaning
that
this
is
real
funds.
Everything
in
that
Dow
is
also
fully
transparent
and
and
auditable
and
accounted
for,
and
everything
and
I
don't
think
anything's,
but
done
with
that
funding
yet,
but
but
just
want
to
make
people
aware
of
that.
A
People
donate
people
can
donate
to
the
multi-sig
as
an
individual
like
Ethan
died
and
whatever
other
token,
as
well
as
doing
it.
On
get
coin,
we
recommend
get
coin
because
there
is
$50,000
matching
for
certain
grants
or
up
to
that
amount,
so
based
on
a
CLR
system,
if
I
understand
it
correctly,
so
use
the
get
coin
if
you're
gonna
donate.
A
B
B
G
Yeah
so
I
originally
was
working
on
that
and
I
created
some
preliminary
designs
and
ideas
for
structure
and
content
and
I've
shared
with
a
couple
people,
but
it
kind
of
depends
on
what
the
status
is
of
the
newly
formed
org
site
and
what
that
will
entail
if
it
will
have
more
technical
documentation
for
users
to
get
started
or,
and
if
not,
we
can
move
forward
with
it.
But
we
don't
want
to
create
something.
That's
essentially
the
same
thing.
Duplicated
twice:
Blayne
do
have
a
many.
They
do
yeah.
F
So
I
added
an
agenda
item
on
a
theorem
that
work
update.
Let's
just
jump
right
to
that
now,
if
everyone's
okay
with
that,
so
a
couple
things
are
happening.
The
first
is
that
there
is
an
initiative
as
I
know
that
I
told
you
guys
before
spearhead
it's
so
hard
to
explain
it's
quote/unquote,
not
officially
an
aetherium
foundation
initiative
or
not
primarily
an
EF
initiative,
but
it
is
being
spearheaded
by
a
very
small
number
of
people
within
the
foundation
to
build
a
new
aetherium
org.
F
F
The
bad
news
is
that
they
won't
tell
me
sort
of
when
they
expect
the
first
MVP
of
this
to
be
done,
that
the
claim
is
that
there's
going
to
be
some
sort
of
you
know
basically
MVP
like
a
Minimum
Viable
site
that
is
released
sometime
soon
for
some
definition
of
soon
and
that
it
will
be
opened
up
to
a
wider
audience
at
that
point
in
time,
but
I
don't
know
who's
working
on
and
now
I
don't
know
when
that
will
be
I.
Don't
know
what
they
mean
by
water
audience,
but
I
don't
know.
F
F
You
know
at
some
specific
point
in
time
in
parallel,
just
in
the
past
24
hours
or
so
there's
been
yet
again,
another
call
in
the
community
for
a
new
etherium
gorg
right.
This
tends
to
happen
every
few
months
and
it
seems
like
today
is
the
next
one,
and
so
some
folks,
including
Lewis
one
of
the
the
founders
of
Aragon,
basically
has
said
that
he's
willing
to
commit
time
and
resources
to
this,
and
some
of
the
people
have
stepped
up
as
well.
F
I
I
went
ahead
previously
and
created
a
github
organization
for
this,
which
is
github.com,
slash,
cerium,
org
and,
while
I'm
a
little
bit
sort
of
concerned
about
duplicated
effort
in
general.
I
think
multiple
initiatives
are
good
and
I
think
that
they
might
both.
But
both
the
one
I
described
a
moment
ago,
as
well
as
a
community
initiative,
might
both
arrived
at
valuable
content
and
that
we
may
find
some
way
in
the
future
to
kind
of
reconcile
these
or
have
them
be
two
sections
of
a
site
or
something
and
in
general
I.
F
A
To
Joseph
from
the
etherium
foundation
about
this
about
having
a
separate
repo
for
the
etherium
org
website
and
the
concern
I
have
from
a
DevOps
perspective
is
that
there
are
special
settings
that
me
and
Jamie
have
to
set
up
when
we
are
doing
a
redirect
from
the
etherium
controlled,
aetherium,
org,
repo
and
the
etherium
github
organization.
So
if
it's
in
a
different
organization,
I
feel
that
that
might
be
affected.
F
Thank
thanks
for
pointing
at
a
hudson.
That's
that's
perfectly
valid.
I
don't
think
anyone
at
this
particular
moment
is
contemplating
transferring
ownership
of
like
the
org.
You
know
kind
of
dns
and
the
what's.
It
called
the
devops
side
of
that.
Thank
you,
of
course,
for
your
ongoing
work
on
that
good
question.
F
You
know
the
flip
side
just
to
play
devil's
advocate
here
is
that
if
it's,
if
it's
a
community
initiative
and
not
an
EF
initiative,
then
you
know
you
could
make
the
case
that
the
community
should
have
ownership
of
it
and
it
shouldn't
live
inside
the
etherium
org
I
guess
maybe
let's
not
take
too
much
time
on
this
call
like
the
good
thing
about
git
is
that
git
itself
is
decentralized
right.
It's
the
worst
case.
We
can
always
have
a
snapshot
of
it
or
a
fork
of
it
or
something
inside
the
etherium
org,
if
necessary.
F
D
F
Yeah
my
take
on
this
is
instead
of
trying
to
fight
the
secrecy
like.
Let's
just
do
the
right
thing
in
open
and
in
public
and
people
can
kind
of
choose
to
support
what
they
want
to
support
and
again
I
just
want
to
be
very
explicit,
like
there's
no
coup,
no
one's
planning
to
take
over
at
their
games
or
be
like.
We
all
want
to
work
together
as
a
community
and
kind
of
come
up
with
the
best
possible
content
that
we
can
and
I'm.
H
D
D
The
effort
that
had
less
transparency
is
the
one
that
ends
up
getting
implemented,
especially
because
that
is
the
EFS
own
effort.
I
could
see
that
causing
a
certain
amount
of
al
cry
about.
You
know
centralization
secret
dictatorship,
like
sort
of
thing
valid
or
not
is
a
different
question,
but
I
could
J.
I
could
just
like
see
that
trope
coming
from
here
I
can.
I
A
D
A
Guess
that
could
still
I
should
say
put
it
this
way.
That
can
still
happen,
but
there
is
only
a
handful
of
people
on
the
side
of
the
the
EF
secret
project
at
the
EF
right
now,
even
so
as
my
perception
so
when
I
say
on
the
side
of,
like
everyone
supports
the
fact
that
it's
getting
done,
but
people
are
frustrated
with
how
slow
it's
going
or
how
lack
of
the
lack
of
transparency
around
it
to
the
point
where
I
don't
think
the
etherium
foundation
would
take
a
public
stance
on
it.
That
would
be
aggressive.
F
Cool
yeah
I
agree
with
that
III
think
we
should
approach
this
like
without
promises.
I,
don't
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
promise
that
that
that
any
another
initiative
is
also
you
know
whatever
comes
out
of.
It
is
definitely
going
to
live
on
a
theory
about
org,
but
I
would
say
that
if
what
comes
out
of
it
is
good
and
if
the
community
feels
that
way
that
it's
highly
likely
to
happen.
F
Think
there
will
be
I
think
so.
Lewis
is
preparing
a
proposal
which
I'm
going
to
contribute
to.
So
let's
wait
till
that's
done
and
yeah
I
think
we
should
probably
add
it
up
for
the
next
call
to
just
circle
back
on
it.
I
do
think,
there's
quite
a
bit
that
the
cat
herders
can
can
do
to
help
with
this
initiative.
A
C
F
There's
a
few
schools
of
thought
here.
My
thought
is,
it
should
be
as
simple
as
possible
and
if
it
were
up
to
me,
I
would
say:
let's
just
replace
all
free
and
have
a
some
other
person
be
a
third
key
holder
and
that
person
I
don't
have
any
strong
preference.
But
it
should
be
someone
that
you
know
it's
kind
of
nominated
from
the
group
in
general.
I
support,
adding
kind
of
more
people
and
expanding
it
and
maybe
moving
instead
of
a
one
event.
F
We
could
have
like
a
you
know,
three
or
five
or
four
of
seven
or
something
in
the
future,
but
I
also
think
that
that's
not
super
critical
right
now
and
I
do
think
that
there
should
be
some
minimum
length
of
time
that
someone
has
kind
of
contributed
to
the
herders
community
before
we
would
give
them
a
key.
So
those.
I
F
F
A
A
B
F
A
F
I
I
I
A
My
suggestion
would
be
that
I
mean
unless
someone
here
knows
of
anyone
in
the
cat
herders,
who
has
a
2.0
experience,
I
guess
in
order
to
coordinate
this
correctly
and
knows
the
people
from
the
other
teams.
I
think
it
would
be
more
of
an
uphill
battle
for
the
cat
herders
to
do
it
compared
to
someone
else
in
the
f
2.0
ecosystem
from
one
of
those
calls.
That's
my
first
thought
on
it.
F
Yeah,
thanks
for
sharing
your
thoughts,
Hudson
and
Makara.
Thank
you,
of
course,
for
reaching
out
about
this
I
kind
of
disagree
with
you.
Hudson
I
mean
I
agree
that
it
would
be
slow
in
the
beginning.
But
the
point
that
I
disagree
about
is
that
like
to
me,
this
is
exactly
what
the
cat
herders
is
for
and
is
supposed
to
help
with
and
so
I'm
suggesting
that
I
mean.
Obviously
it's
not
up
to
you
or
I
right,
it's
up
to
the
other
people
in
the
group.
F
But
if
anyone
in
this
group
is
interested
in
helping
out
with
eath
2:00
p.m.
work,
I
think
they
should,
and
I
think
that
yes,
there
will
definitely
be
a
learning
curve
and
it
will
take
some
time
to
get
up
to
speed.
But
I
do
see
value
in
that.
Given
that
we
have
a
group
of
professional
project
managers
here
and.
J
B
Yeah,
yes,
the
reason
I've
sorry
about
that,
but
it's
just
we
were
talking
about
coordination
for
a2,
dot,
o
and
micro,
saying
that
there's
some
work
then
being
between
her
team
and
Artemis
already.
So
how
do
we
just
like
coordinate
more
broadly
amongst,
like
the
two
Donnell
team,
to
make
sure
we
do
get
like
a
multi-client
that's
net
and
whether
or
not
the
cat
herders
are
like
the
right
group
to
do
that.
J
Yeah
I
bet
I,
can't
say
I
think
coordination
is
going
pretty
good.
Now
we
have
some
like
rough
patches
in
the
beginning
kind
of
like
everybody
getting
used
to
everybody,
and
this
might
be
slightly
off
topic
for
planning
on
it
on
it.
Interoperability
workshop
sometime
in
July,
we're
like
Co
planning
that
with
chain
safe,
but
that
surely
that
won't
bring
us
everything
for
interoperability.
That
will
you
know
the
one
kind
of
like
milestone,
I
think
but
yeah
yeah
I
think
so
far
we're
doing
pretty
good.
J
G
I
I,
don't
have
much
PM
experience,
but
what
comes
off
the
top
is
more
like
setting
deadlines
for
things
and
perhaps
trying
to
gather
bottlenecks
and
what
what
can
be
done
in
order
to
resolve
those
ball
necks
and
making
sure
that
all
the
teams
are
like
implementing
the
spec
on
time.
So
various
so
there's
various
releases
and
different
teams
are
targeting
different
releases,
but
in
order
to
have
a
multi-client
test,
net
we'd
have
to
target
any
0.5,
0
or
above
because
those
those
releases
have
tests
consensus
tests.
I
A
Yeah,
something
like
that
wouldn't
hurt
I'd
the
more
I
think
about
this,
the
more
I'm
starting
to
change
her
mind
and
agree
with
Lane
that
we
could
come
up
with
certain
things,
even
if
they're
small
things
at
first.
That
would
help
with
coordination
like
the
chart
you're
talking
about,
for
instance,
and
that
would
also
give
whoever
is
running
that
a
chance
to
get
to
know
the
earth
2.0
team's
a
little
bit
more.
F
E
Definitely
like
to
look
into
it,
I'm
not
sure
how
much
helpful
could
be,
but
as
far
as
I
can
understand,
Mike
Harris
came
from
what
she
may
be
looking
from
us
as
a
being
in
perspective.
It's
more
of
tracking
and
coordination
thing
like
if
it
is
being
implemented
in
a
plan
and
properly
and
what
is
ready
or
not
so
I
would
like
to
get
in
touch.
E
G
I
E
C
B
Cool-
and
maybe
we
should
just
leave
this
on
the
agenda
for
next
time
for
for
like
this
group
to
report
back
about
what's
happening
and
I
think
like
McCrory,
said
you're
bringing
it
up
in
two
days
at
the
to
call
as
well
right,
so
I
think
getting
a
feel
from
what
all
those
people
want.
Their
dough
cloth
will
be
valuable
as
well.
B
E
It's
regarding
the
ECHL
website,
I
think
that
needs
to
be
updated,
so
I'm
not
sure
who
is
taking
of
that.
But
probably
they
can
look
into
a
couple
of
stuffs
like
we
can
update
the
upcoming
hard
folk
with
the
new
one,
and
we
can
add
these
you're
playing
credit
and
get
a
link
and
something
we
can
make.
Our
SH
website
updated.
E
B
B
B
One
thing
I
tried
to
do
personally
during
the
last
quarter.
Dev
was
just
kind
of
live
tweeted
that
was
like
a
50
fish,
tweet
thread,
which
is
probably
still
a
lot,
but
a
bit
quicker
to
parse.
So
I'm
wondering
if
people
have
ideas
around
like
how
could
we
just
more
succinctly
share
the
update
remark
or
devs
and
on
which
platforms
I
had
a
few
but
I'm
curious
to
hear
anyone
else
has
like
strong
opinions.
There's
off
I
actually
really
like
the
live,
tweet
idea,
yeah.
C
H
On
what
Brett
said,
I
think
that's
the
correct
way
and
I
you
want
to
suggest
actually
just
crunching
up
the
notes
or
the
tweaks
and
making
it
shorter
summary
with
the
most
relevant
things,
because
people
won't
read
more
than
let's
say
for
400
words
tops
and
on
the
magicians
forum
every
every
time
that
there's
a
court
of
call,
because
we
already
are
using
that
forum.
So
I
think
it
makes
no
sense
to
reinvent
the
wheel.
I.
B
Think
that's
a
great
idea
I,
like
the
idea
of
capping
it
at
400
words
or
around
that
right,
like
less
than
five
minutes
to
read.
One
thing
I
also
noticed
is
that
the
at
etherium
accounts
tends
to
tweet
the
live
stream
for
the
core
devs
call,
but
it
would
maybe
be
good
if,
like
I,
don't
know
if
they
could
just
retweet.
B
That
summary,
because
as
much
as
like,
we
like
the
magicians
and
the
cat,
herders
they're
like
following
of
the
app
aetherium
account,
is
like
two
orders
of
magnitudes
bigger,
so
I
feel
like
Hudson
terrain,
you
would
probably
notice
more
but
I'm
not
sure
if
it'd
be
possible
to
just
share
those
summaries
with
the
broader
community
as
well.
I.
A
Like
the
idea
of
having
a
dedicated
coordinates,
Twitter
account
that
shares
that
and
then
beyond
that
people
like
Evan,
then
Ness
can
do
it
in
this
week
in
aetherium,
and
we
can
do
like
a
reddit
post,
basically
hitting
it
up,
Twitter,
reddit
and
Evan,
and
those
are
the
main
ones
I
can
think
of
right.
Now,
okay,.
H
H
So
I
would
like
for
it
for
easy
access
as
well.
I
would
actually
continue
to
press
on
like
publishing
them
all
image
issues,
because
it
can
actually
make
some
sort
of
a
connection
and
obviously
cross
posting
on
reddit
I
think
that's
ready.
The
loan
will
do,
especially
because
we
have
some
people
in
the
community
that
are
very
interested
and
just
don't
visit
ready
to
anymore
because
of
the
so-called
success
ET
or
whatever
you
wanna
call
it,
but
to
make
these
kind
of
summaries
also
just
to
generate
a
pool
of
two
to
three
volunteers.
B
Yeah
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
so
having
if
magicians
as
like
the
central
repo
of
these
things
having
to
issue
people
dedicated
to
it,
making
sure
to
read
it.
Those
people
will
probably
organically
share
it
on
Twitter
as
well.
The
only
thing
that
maybe
add
is
it
could
be
good
to
add
it
to
the
agenda
for
that
court.
Halves
call.
B
H
B
E
C
E
E
B
E
E
C
E
B
E
C
B
G
B
B
B
F
A
heads
up
two
weeks
from
now
is
during
is
during
Eid
Khan.
Some
of
us
will
be
in
Sydney
Australia
for
that
so
timing,
wise
it's
a
little
tough
with
time
zones
and
stuff,
but
it
doesn't
mean
the
call
shouldn't
happen
just
pointing
that
out
and
we
have
people
who
join
this
call
regularly
from
that
time.
So
and
so
I'm.