►
From YouTube: EIP Editing Office Hour Meeting 9
Description
Agenda: https://github.com/ethereum-cat-herders/EIPIP/issues/201
A
A
The
pull
request
number
would
be
here
is
six
two,
two
one:
six,
zero.
Five
nine
is
the
EIP
number.
So
thank
you,
Sam
for
joining
Sam.
If
you
would
like
to
screen
share
and
maybe
yeah
start
reviewing
the
proposal
we
are
joined
by
author
Stephen
here.
A
Stephen,
we
can't
hear
you
if
you're
talking,
if
you
have
any
specific
question
on
this
beer,
please
feel
free
to
share.
B
Yes,
yes,
we
can.
Okay
thanks.
B
Sure
yeah
I
can
I
can
do
that.
So,
generally
speaking,
authors
are
responsible
for
finding
their
own
reviewers
I'll
set
a
peer
reviewer
from
our
list,
but
generally
speaking,
they
do
a
pretty
light.
Look
so
far,
so.
B
Oh
sure,
so
you
move
your
EIP
from
drafting
to
review
like
you're
doing
here,
and
then
this
is
when
you
as
an
author,
will
go
out
and
find
people
who
are
relevant
to
either
implement
it
or
give
feedback
on
it.
B
B
So
in
this
case,
since
it's
like
a
non-fungible
token,
there's
a
working
group
that
I'll
I'll
share
the
link
with
you
might
want
to
look
on,
say
the
openc
Discord
or
a
few
other,
like
you,
know,
nft
related
places
and
see.
If
anybody
there
would
like
to
review
for
you
and
then,
whenever
you
think
that
your
EIP
is
ready,
you
can
move
it
into
last
call.
B
B
Yeah,
so
it's
restarting
the
list
every
time.
So
if
you
want,
you
can
indent
these,
so
just
I
think
it's
two,
maybe
three
spaces
or
you
can
use
the
backslashes
that
Panda's
suggesting
and
it'll
actually
put
them
into
the
list
for
you
so
it'll
yeah.
You
see,
you
should
probably
fix
that
first
and
then
Panda
will
probably
merge
it
once
once
you
make
that
change.
D
C
A
B
So,
generally
speaking,
we
we
like
people
to
remove
the
build
system
configuration
so
like
you're,
prettier,
config,
okay,.
C
B
Let's
take
a
look
at
this
pull
request.
C
Yes,
we've
we've
been
working
with
the
actually
the
two
eips
which
are
needed
for
this
one,
one
for
multi-assets
and
one
for
nestable
nfts.
So
there
were
a
couple
of
other
wish
Implement
something
similar
on
nesting,
but
we
are
in
in
the
other
rationale.
We
explained
how
the
nestables
is
different
and
this
one
utilizes,
the
the
other
two
okay.
C
B
Quick
read,
it
seems
fine,
like
a
you're
following
the
format
well
and
all
that
I
don't
want
to
get
too
in
depth
in
in
actually
reviewing
it
right
now.
Just
because
I
don't
know
we're
we're
on
a
call
and
I.
B
C
Yeah,
the
purpose
today
is
for
it
to
be
in
your
radar,
so
you
can
check
it
someday.
Probably
next
year.
B
Yeah
I'll
I
I
will
get
around
to
it
so
yeah
thanks
for
for
proposing
and
yeah.
It
looks
good
so.
C
D
A
Wherever
the
next
one
is
PR
number
6051,
the
author
is
here,
but
it
seems
like
it
is
merged
right
now,
a
few
minutes
ago,
okay,.
B
A
Yeah
VG,
if
you
have
any
other
specific
question
related
to
this
proposal,
feel
free
to
ask.
No,
it's
a
good,
no
okay,
cool,
very
good!
Thank
you.
A
All
right
and
I
do
not
have
any
other
specific
number
for
discussion.
So
probably
we
can
pick
up
from
The
Proposal
in
the
last
call,
which
is
6185.
A
B
B
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
B
B
A
So
I
think
people
are
discussing
again
on
having
ens
as
an
author
name,
yeah.
B
A
B
D
D
D
D
D
B
D
B
D
B
At
least
something
very
similar
reference
implementation.
B
B
A
So
the
next
three
proposals,
six
one,
eight
eight,
six,
one,
eight
nine
and
six
one
nine
zero.
All
three
are
related
to
self-destruct
proposed
by
Panda
babe
yeah.