►
Description
Everything EOS is a weekly podcast from ICO Alert that follows the EOS ecosystem: dApp spotlights, VC partnerships, announcements, and more!
—————————————
The ICO Alert Podcast showcases exclusive, in-depth interviews with founders of past, present, and future Initial Coin Offerings. New episodes are released weekly. If you’d like, you can request a guest to appear on a future episode by tweeting us @icoalert
The ICO Alert Podcast is available on iTunes and anywhere podcasts are found.
ICO Alert Podcast: https://blog.icoalert.com/podcasts/home
ICO Alert: https://www.icoalert.com/
Cypherglass: https://www.cypherglass.com/
Twitter: @Cypherglass
A
Welcome
to
everything
yes,
I'm
Zack
gall
and
I
CEO
data
analyst
at
ICO
alert
the
trusted
ICO
discovery
platform
visit,
ICO
alert,
calm.
The
most
complete
calendar
of
all
active
and
upcoming
ICO
is
to
discover
the
latest
projects
and
opportunities
like
ISIL
and
I'm.
Here
today,
with
the
founder
of
ICO
alert
and
CEO
of
block
producer,
cypher
glass,
Rob,
Finch,.
B
Thank
you
all
so
much
for
joining
us
forget
another
episode
of
everything.
Yes,
it's
kind
of
crazy
that
we're
already
on
episode.
20
here,
if
you
enjoy
the
show,
please
do
let
us
know
by
liking,
subscribing
or
following
the
podcast
on
YouTube
iTunes
SoundCloud
Spotify,
wherever
you
may
be
listening.
We
do
appreciate
the
feedback
in
comments
we
get
about
the
show
and
we
hope
you'll
continue
to
share
your
thoughts
and
opinions
to
help
us
continue
to
grow
and
improve
on.
B
Before
we
get
started,
I
do
need
to
mention
that
this
is
not
a
sponsored
podcast.
We're
just
too
excited
members
of
the
EOS
community
who
hold
es
tokens
ourselves,
but
we
are
not
receiving
compensation
from
la
Kwan
or
anyone
else
with
INEOS
for
this
podcast.
In
addition,
I
do
need
to
mention,
as
a
matter
of
disclosure,
that
boats
that
call
and
I
do
hold
es
tokens
ourselves
and
that
this
podcast
should
not
be
construed
as
legal
financial,
tax,
professional
or
any
other
kind
of
advice.
B
A
B
So
an
ETF
is
what's
called
an
exchange-traded
fund
and
essentially
it
allows
someone
to
trade
and
assets
of
something
like
gold,
or
even
you
know,
corn
or
oil.
It
allows
you
to
trade
that
asset
or
I
guess
the
price
of
that
underlying
asset
kind
of
like
a
stock.
So
in
this
case
you
know
with
in
a
Bitcoin
ETF.
B
You
know,
for
example,
one
of
the
ones
that
got
declined
yesterday,
because
they
were
actually
nine
I
think
that
the
SEC
declined,
even
though
they
only
had
to
answer
on
one,
was
an
ETF
that
was
pinned
to
the
CBOE
Bitcoin
futures
price
and
settles
in
dollars.
Some
other
ETFs
that
were
declined
were
pinned
directly
to
the
value
of
a
Bitcoin
or
25
Bitcoin,
for
example,
but
that's
basically
what
an
ETF
is.
It's
an
investment
vehicle
that
represents
value
in
some
other
asset,
so.
A
B
A
It
wasn't
too
long
ago
that
the
Winklevoss
ETF
appeal,
which
wasn't
even
their
application.
This
was
actually
the
appeal
to
their
original
denial
from
from
a
ETF
proposal
they
proposed
last
year,
yeah
and
when
that
got
denied
that's
whenever
we
saw
that
spike
down
from
like
an
$8,500,
a
quick
short
little
run
on
bitcoins
yeah,
but
this
one,
the
market
kind
of
had
it
price,
didn't
no
one
expected
it
to
pass
and
I.
Don't
think
anyone
actually
suspected
the
Winklevoss
one
would
pass
either,
but
the
market
reacted
regardless
and
I
thought
yesterday.
A
B
I
knew
a
four
that
were
coming
out,
I,
think
three
of
which,
including
the
one
that
we
all
you
know,
saw
that
was
gonna,
be
either
approved
or
denied.
Yesterday
all
got
to
climb,
but
it
looks
like
the
the
CBOE
vinick's
solid
x.
Bitcoin
etf
is
the
only
one
that
hasn't
been
denied,
so
everything
else
basically
across
the
board,
got
wiped
clean
and
that
CBOE
one
still
exists.
That's.
A
That's
the
thing
right:
there
is
everyone's
got
their
eyes
on
the
Van
Exel
iudex
Bitcoin
trust
ETF,
that
one
got
delayed,
which
all
nine
of
the
ones
yesterday
were
outright
denied.
The
winklevosses
was
denied
and
every
time
it
gets
denied
the
sec
outlines
a
list
of
reasons
why
it
was
denied
right
and
one
that
one
of
the
main
reasons
listed
in
the
proShares
denial
yesterday
was
that
quote
that
a
national
securities
exchanges
rules
be
designed
to
prevent
fraudulent
and
manipulative
acts
and
practices.
B
And
this
to
me
feels
like
a
reason
from
the
SEC
to
be
completely
honest:
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day
they
have
the
ability
to
approve
it
analysis
if
they
want
I.
Think
last
time
they
had
mentioned
manipulation
in
Bitcoin
markets.
But
what
was
interesting
about
this
ETF
that
I
highlighted
on
Twitter
and
said
I
had
the
best
chance
of
being
approved
so
so
far
was
that
it's
actually
pin
to
CBOE
Bitcoin
futures
and
not
Bitcoin
and.
B
So
the
SEC
couldn't
kind
of
use
that
this
time
and
say
hey,
you
know
the
underlying
asset
is
manipulated
since
the
CBOE
Bitcoin
futures
are
already
regulated
and
approved
by
the
SEC,
so
I
think,
ultimately,
whether
they,
if
they
want
to
deny
something
I,
can't
come
up
with
any
reason
they
want
to
deny
it.
But
this
to
me
seems
like
I,
don't
know
not
a
legitimate
reason,
so.
B
A
A
100
X
leverage
would
basically
or
any
type
of
leverage
means
that
you're
using
the
the
either
tether
or
Bitcoin
or
any
type
of
crypto
collateral
you're
you
you're
using
it
as
a
collateralized
loan
to
borrow
more
of
another
asset,
so
you
don't
actually
have
to
own
a
hundred
x
of
Bitcoin.
So
so
what
that
basically
means
is,
if
I
have
one
dollar
I
could
buy
up
to
a
hundred
dollars
worth
of
Bitcoin
with
that
one
dollar,
because
I
have
a
dollar
of
collateral.
But
if
the
price
would
even
move
a
pen,
I
would
get
liquidated.
A
And
most
platforms,
like
I,
think
polo
actually
was
one
of
the
first
platforms,
I
used
that
allowed
leverage
trading
and
their
us-based,
which
is
interesting,
but
they
only
allow
it
on
Bitcoin
pairs
and
they
require
you
to
have
I
think
like
40%
of
your
wallet
collateralized.
So
you
can
only
go
about
two
X
leverage
which
which
is
fair,
because
then,
if
if,
for
example,
the
price
of
V
s
moves
up,
one
dollar
you're
gaining
two
dollars.
If
it
goes
down,
one.
B
B
A
When
that
happens,
when,
like
ideally
I
guess,
you
won
it
50/50,
because
then
there's
a
long
for
every
short
and
it
kind
of
evens
out
the
market
right.
But
whenever
you're
top-heavy
on
one
way
or
the
other,
that
there's
always
a
chance
for
what's
called
a
short
squeeze
or
a
long
squeeze,
which
basically
means
that
the
price
will
go
up
and
start
liquidating
shorts
and
when
a
short
gets
liquidated
automatically
turns
into
a
market
by
order
which
further
does
the
price
upwards
yeah.
B
A
Of
all
the
shorts,
either
closing
or
getting
liquidated.
So
basically,
what
happened
was
bit
Mex,
which
is
the
highest
leveraged
highest
volume
trade
platform
for
Bitcoin.
It
was
down
for
maintenance,
so
anyone
who
had
a
short
position
wasn't
able
to
deleverage
it
or
close
it
out,
and
everyone
are
not
everyone.
Probably
a
group
of
whales.
B
B
A
A
What
they're
actually
using
is
a
price
indexed
based
on
a
group
of
OTC
platforms,
yeah
which,
for
those
unaware
an
OTC
trade,
it
means
basically
trades
that
happen
off
of
an
exchange
because
they're,
very
big
buyer
sell
orders
so
we're
talking
millions
of
dollars
of
Bitcoin
changing
hands,
and
if
you
were
to
do
that
kind
of
selling
on
an
exchange,
you
would
drive
the
price
either
up
or
down
in
one
direction.
Just
due
to
the
liquidity
on
the
books,
yeah.
B
A
If
you're
trying
to
sell
a
lot
of
Bitcoin
they'll
match
you
up
with
a
buyer
and
vice
versa,
so
they're
using
a
price
index
based
on
a
group
of
in
index
of
OTC
funds
and
they
call
themselves
the
MV
B
TCO
index,
not
sure
what
that
stands
for,
but
basically
the
price
is
going
to
be
calculated
every
15
seconds
it's
going
to
close
at
4:00
p.m.
every
day
and
that
that's
a
major
difference,
because
those
prices
can't
be
manipulated.
Like.
B
B
We
see
well
that's
one
of
the
main
things
that
the
SEC
mentioned
and
one
of
the
previous
denials,
not
the
ones
that
happened
this
week,
but
one
of
the
previous,
maybe
the
the
Winklevoss,
but
anyway
mentioning
that
there's
no
real,
accurate
price
measurement
right
now.
You
have
all
these
different
exchanges.
Some
in
Korea
are
trading
$100
higher
some
of
your
trading
$100
lower.
So
by
having
some
kind
of
index
like
this,
that
represent
a
reliable
Bitcoin
price
I
think
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
Mm-Hmm.
A
And
I
mean
I,
don't
work
with
any
OTC
trading.
This
myself,
but
it
sounds
like
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
talk
that
they're
doing
a
lot
of
volume
right
now,
a
lot
of
the
volumes
going
on
in
these
OTC
trading
desks.
So
whenever
you're
talking
about
million
dollar
sales
changing
hands
the
price
that
they're
paying
is
going
to
be
like
an
agreed-upon
price,
it's
gonna
be
flat.
It's
not
gonna,
be
susceptible
to
market
manipulation.
A
B
B
A
A
delay
is
good
because
we
know
that
the
backed
platform
is
going
to
be
launching
I
believe
in
November
yeah
and
the
deadline
for
the
the
solid
X
Bitcoin
trust
the
final
possible
deadline.
After
all,
possible
delays
is
gonna,
be
February,
27,
2019,
yep,
I
I.
Think
early
2019
is
gonna,
be
the
perfect
time
for
this
thing
to
get
approved.
I
think
another
delay
is
gonna,
be
extremely
bullish.
A
I
think
we're
probably
gonna,
see
some
positive
price
movement
leading
up
to
September
and
then
we'll
probably
see
another
decline
with
the
delay,
but
I
see
the
delay
is
the
most
bullish
thing
possible
just
by
knowing
about
the
ice
and
the
backed
stuff
coming
up
at
the
end
of
this
year.
Oh
absolutely
so,
I
guess
that's
it.
Let's
get
back
in
that!
Yes,
yeah.
A
A
Vote
decay
has
been
a
big
issue,
so
I
think
it'd
be
a
good
time
to
remind
our
audience
to
restate
your
votes,
because
your
votes
actually
decay
if
you've,
if
you
vote
for
your
top
30
block
producers
today
after
one
year,
your
your
let's
say
you
vote
a
hundred
EOS,
your
vote.
Power
is
only
gonna,
be
fifty
after
one
year.
B
Votes
basically
lose
roughly
a
little
bit
more
slightly
more,
but
roughly
one
percent
of
their
voting
power
per
week.
So
if
you
don't
continue
to
revote,
part
of
your
stack
basically
gets
chipped
away
every
single
week
and
your
votes
count
less
and
less
and
less.
But
if
you
go
in
and
just
vote
the
same
way,
you
did
the
first
time
your
votes
will
automatically
be
renewed
back
to
100%
voting
power.
It.
A
Was
something
that
was
being
overlooked
for
a
while?
Oh
yeah,
I
did
the
show
last
week
with
es
Canada
in
New
York,
with
a
Kevin
and
Josh
and
after
the
call
or
after
the
podcast
recording,
we
kind
of
were
just
talking
a
little
bit
and
they
brought
up
the
vote.
Decane
they're,
looking
into
it
and
eight
to
ten
percent
of
almost
every
block.
Producers
votes
were
completely
decayed
or
oh
yeah,
because
a
lot
of
this
vote
happened
that
Genesis
and
then
people
just
kind
of
forgot
about
it.
Yeah.
B
And
a
lot
of
people
have
been
talking,
you
know:
hey
remove,
vote
decay.
This
is
horrible,
but
the
whole
point
of
vote
decay
and
I'm
in
favor
of
this
vote.
Decay
for
sure
the
whole
point
of
it
is
to
get
you
every
time.
You
re
staking
your
votes,
whether
that's
once
a
week
or
once
a
month
or
even
once
a
year,
if
you
don't
really
care
as
much
going
in
and
making
sure
that
the
block
producers
that
you
voted
for
the
first
time,
our
steel
block
producers,
you
want
to
vote
for
now.
B
Maybe
you
want
to
remove
some.
Maybe
you
want
to
add
some
others,
but
it
sort
of
gives
you
an
opportunity
and
forces
you
to
go
in
and
say:
hey.
Am
I
okay
with
the
block
producers?
I
voted
for
or
do
I
want
to
switch
it
up,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
feature
and
something
that
I
think
will
ultimately
benefit
the
health
of
the
network
in
the
long
run,
even
though
it
may
be
a
little
bit
annoying
at
the
beginning,
some
of
the.
A
Complaints
I
saw
in
telegram
or
maybe
suggestions
where
that
some
people
aren't
happy
that
the
vote.
Decay
also
happens
when
you
vote
for
a
proxy
yeah,
but
I
I'm
all
for
it.
I
think
that
the
same
rules
should
apply
across
the
board.
It's
kind
of
a
nuance.
Oh
you
just
got
to
deal
with,
because
what
it
is
is
people.
A
Some
people
are
using
proxies
to
handle
their
votes
because
most
token
holders
don't
have
the
time
to
research
all
100-plus
block
producers
to
choose
their
top
30,
so
basically
that
they're
their
chosing
a
reputable
proxy
who
they
say
all
right.
I
give
you
all
of
my
voting
power
and
I
trust
that
you're
going
to
distribute
my
votes
to
the
top
block
producers
based
on
your
research
right.
A
B
Totally
agree
and
I
think
it
is
a
good
thing
for
proxies,
because
then,
even
if
you
don't
have
time
to
go
out
and
research,
the
hundred
plus
block
producers
make
sure
that
if
you
did
vote
for
a
proxy
that
the
proxy
still
doing
what
you
want
it
to
do.
If
they're,
you
know
voting
for
only
bps
with
their
metal
just
follow
up
with
them
and
telegram
or
just
make
sure
that
they're
still
doing
what
they
said.
They're
doing
and
then
renew
your
vote
for
them.
So.
B
Had
a
significant
amount
of
votes
from
BitFenix,
so
for
those
you
don't
know,
Biffen
x
allows
the
users
on
their
exchange
to
vote
through
their
internal
voting
tool
and
then
once
a
week
or
it's
been,
you
know
once
every
couple
weeks
now
they
renew
the
votes
based
through
their
BitFenix
proxies
based
on
the
votes
of
their
users.
On
the
exchange
that
hold
that
EOS.
We
noticed
one
week
that
suddenly
we
went
from
having
you
know
say
ten:
twenty
thirty
million
votes
on
their
platform
to
having
none
and
our
name
didn't
come
up
along
with
I.
B
Think
one
other
blog
petition
name
didn't
come
up
in
their
public.
You
know
transparency
JSON
file
at
all.
We
were
just
totally
eliminated
from
the
platform.
Anybody
the
cast
a
vote
for
us
wasn't
actually
counting
on
Biffen
X,
so
we've
been
working
with
them
working
with
Paulo
the
CTO
up
in
Phoenix
over
the
last
couple
weeks
to
basically
fix
their
voting
tool.
The
tool
had
some
issues.
We
made
it
a
little
bit
easier
for
them
to
recast
their
votes,
made
it
easy
for
them
to
tally
their
votes
and
now.
B
Finally,
that
tool
is
working
again
and
we
got
another
I
think
it's
17
million
votes
from
those
Biff
and
X
proxies,
so
we're
back
up
at
I
believe
as
of
today,
position,
26
and
I
think
we're
five
or
six
million
votes
away
from
the
top
twenty
one.
So
pretty
good
move-
and
you
know
we
appreciate
the
folks
at
BitFenix
Paulo
and
a
shout
out
to
James
Sutherland,
our
our
star
tech
guy,
who
worked
with
him
all
these
weeks
to
really
help
them
fix
that
voting
tool
and
get
it
all
back
on
track.
Were.
B
Yeah
I
mean
any
time
the
rankings
get
shuffled
significantly,
it's
generally
when
bid
for
next
revote.
So
it's
those
proxies
that
are,
for
you
know
that
biggest
voter
on
the
network.
Right
now,
through
all
the
Biffen
X
users,
I
noticed
you
work,
dropped
down
a
bunt.
She
goes
Canada
down
to
14
yeah,
someone.
A
B
A
Mean
I
feel,
like
you've,
gained
a
lot
of
respect
from
the
other
bps,
but
there's
there
was
also
other
good
BP's
that
were
ranked
a
lot
lower
than
I
thought.
They
should
be
no
absolutely,
but
but
the
shuffle
man
see
it
seen
the
people
who
were
in
the
top
five
dropped
to
like
the
tens
and
teens
oh
yeah,
I.
B
A
B
Said
for
once
and
not
know,
what's
gonna
happen,
but
I
think
this
seeing
what's
happening
in
the
block
producer
rankings
and
seeing
what's
happening
with
the
token
price
is
the
strongest
argument
I've
seen
for
keeping
the
worker
proposal
fund
because
block
producers
right
now
are
worried
about
covering
their
infrastructure
cost.
Some
are
breaking
even
some
are
maybe
making
a
little
bit
of
profit
and
a
lot
are
losing
money
so
to
also
expect
block
producers
to
be
out
funding
gaps
and
funding
projects
rather
than
the
worker
proposal
fund.
A
B
A
Get
it
done,
maybe
in
the
next
couple
months,
definitely
within
a
year
yeah,
but
like
we're
not
trying
to
rush
this
to
turn
into
just
a
money
grab
for
it
for
everyone
with
wale
votes.
So
like
we
want
to
do
everything
we
can
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen,
but
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
need
funding
and
debt.
A
B
B
B
If
the
project
is
the
cup
you
put
the
cup
under
the
faucet,
which
is
the
worker
proposal,
find
and
fill
it
up,
and
then
you
turn
the
faucet
off
I,
like
that,
a
lot
better
than
just
sort
of
letting
this
money
collect
and
collect
and
collect,
and
then
opening
that
money
up
to
manipulation.
If
somebody
coming
in
and
asking
for
a
ton
of
money
and
getting
wale
votes
so.
B
A
What
a
caps
at-
and
that
makes
sense
to
me,
because
we
don't
want
to
fund
everyone
in
their
brothers
projects,
but
there's
a
few
key
projects
and
they're
mentioned
last
week
on
the
episode.
If
you
want
to
go
back
and
listen
to
the
episode
about
the
worker
proposal
system,
but
it
just
blows
my
mind
that
Dan
spoke
out
so
heavily
against
it.
When
the
the
a
similar
fund
to
this
on
bitshares
was
the
reason
that
he
left
bitshares
in
the
first
place
was
basically
in
a
bear
market.
A
So
so
bitshares
allows
dolls
kind
of
to
operate
within
their
own
platform
and
it
was
originally
supposed
to
be
self
funding.
So
it
fund
its
own
development
yeah
and
during
a
bear
market.
I,
don't
know
if
his
2014-2015
I
don't
know
when
it
was.
But
the
voters
voted
against
funding
dan
lemurs
development
on
the
platform.
B
B
The
episode
yeah
one
thing
I
wanted
to
mention.
You
know.
Speaking
of
all
these
new
products,
there
are
new
products
that
are
moving
to
EOS,
but
all
of
the
projects
that
have
already
moved
to
EOS
that
have
already
air
draft
people
have
been
wondering.
You
know:
where
can
I
trade?
These
things
did
a
video.
B
So
a
lot
of
people
right
now,
don't
think
any
of
these
air
drops
other
than
maybe
IQ
the
ever
PDO
to
Kenard
trading
because
they
go
to
coin
market
capcom,
they
search
it
and
they
don't
see
it
pulled
up
there,
but
all
of
these
tokens
are
actually
being
traded
on
decentralized
exchanges
that
aren't
hooked
into
coin
market
cap.
So
if
you
go
to
Dec
Co,
Co
or
new
decks
dot
IO,
you
can
see
pretty
much
all
the
air
drops
on
new
decks.
Some
of
the
air
drops
on
deck
ce
o--'s
that
are
trading
now.
B
So
if
you
missed
out
on
an
air
drop
and
you
want
to
buy
more
head
over
and
buy
some,
if
you,
you
know
have
some
that
you
want
to
sell
that
you're,
not
too
too
excited
about,
you
can
go
over
there
and
sell
them
as
well.
So
new
centralized
exchanges,
both
launching
Neos
and
one
of
the
things
I
mentioned
in
the
video
that
I
kind
of
want
to
restate
here
now
it's
just
using
these
Dex's,
even
if
you're
only
buying
one
token
or
selling
one
token.
B
It's
pretty
crazy
to
see
the
power
of
yos
first
hand,
because
if
you've
ever
used
it
a
centralized
exchange
on
aetherium,
you
know
how
horrible
it
can
be.
You're
waiting
a
couple
minutes
for
your
trade
to
confirm
you're,
paying
a
dollar
transaction
fee,
sometimes
more
and
on
EOS
no
transaction
fee.
It's
totally
free
and
all
of
the
trades
are
settling
instantly
with
that
half
second
block
time.
So
it's
a
really
good
user
experience
feels
just
like
a
centralized
exchange,
which
I
think
it's
important
and
one
of
the
reasons
why
it
has
so
much
liquidity.
B
You've
personally
used
both
I
have
used
both
both
deck
cos
and
new
decks
I
personally,
like
new
decks
better
just
because
they
list
all
of
the
air
drops
versus
only
some
of
them
on
deck,
see
us,
but
you
know,
if
you're
in
there
looking
to
buy,
maybe
buy
from
both
because
they
they
both
can
sell.
At
the
same
price
and
combine
the
liquidity,
how
is
their
UI
good.
B
Say
new
decks
reminds
me
a
lot
of
buy
Nance,
it's
very
simple.
You
know
you
have
a
scroll
to
pick
your
pair.
You
can
go
in
by
cell
it's
very
similar
to
a
centralized
exchange
and
other
than
having
to
click
approve
in
scatter.
It
functions
exactly
the
same
as
any
centralized
exchange,
but
it's
decentralized.
How
about
liquidity?
Liquidity
is
pretty
good
more
so
on
some
tokens
than
others.
Obviously,
IQ
CET
now
EOS
black
have
a
ton
of
liquidity.
B
There
are
others,
that's
kind
of
up
and
down
where
you
may
go
into
you
know
by
and
see
how
there's
not
a
ton
of
cell
orders.
They
a
little
bit
then
an
hour
later,
there's
a
bunch
of
cell
orders
that
then
I'll
get
bought
up.
So
it
just
depends
on
the
time
of
day,
but
a
lot
of
these
projects
have
a
pretty
significant
amount
of
liquidity
or
trading
at
decent
prices.
So
your
air
drops
are
worth
something.
That's.
B
A
A
They
actually
tweeted
out
with
their
official
Twitter
account
that
they're
interested
in
becoming
an
active
member
of
the
EOS
Alliance
which
I'll
get
into
later,
and
they
basically
said
that
they
share
their
same
vision
and
then
later
on
their
co-founder
Scott
Shepherd.
He
followed
up
on
on
the
EO
subreddit,
basically
saying
that
they're
committed
to
having
their
Oracle
network
support
a
OS
which
will
basically
enable
yo
smart
contracts
to
call
out
to
the
real
world
for
location
data
via
the
XY
o
network
API
yeah.
A
There's
another
project
called
Sentinel
which
I
don't
know
much
about,
but
I
do
know
it
was
moving
from
the
icon
platform.
I
see
X
for
it,
for
anyone
familiar
with
that
and
that
that's
one
of
the
I've
seen
that
mention
is
like
an
EOS
competitor.
It's
supposed
to
be
a
scalable
platform.
So
it's
real
interesting
to
see
a
project
moving
off
of
icon
des
yeah.
B
A
B
B
So
I
don't
know
a
ton
about
this
other
than
the
video
I
watched
and
I
checked
out
their
website,
but
Infinite
Earths
is
sort
of
like
decentraland,
which
allows
you
to
buy
virtual
land,
but
rather
than
buying
that
virtual
land
in
a
virtual
world
you're
buying
that
virtual
land
in
the
real
world.
So
your
backyard,
for
example,
could
be
a
plot
of
land
and
you
wear.
B
A
B
Yeah
I
mean
Infinite
Earths,
you
go
to
infinite,
you
can
check
it
out
and
see
their
cool
promo
video,
but
this
is
a
totally
new
project
that
just
announced
that
will
be
running
on.
Eos
will
be
air
dropping
on
EOS,
as
many
of
these
other
projects
are,
and
it's
just
cool
to
see
more
and
more
developers
coming
out
and
announcing
their
support
to
build
a
neo
snap,
especially
when
we're
in
this
bear
market.
B
A
B
Ideas
selling
stuff
I
mean
this
is
what
I'm
so
excited
about
about
games
on
us
that
are
finally
tokenized.
We've
talked
about
this
since,
since
Bitcoin
in
2013
people
were
talking
about.
Oh,
you
can
have
tokenize
games,
it's
gonna
be
awesome,
but
now
to
actually
see
it
happening
and
see
people
making
money
on
it.
Since
there
are
new
transaction
fees
like
on
crypto
kitties
and
all
these
other
things
it's
it's
very
exciting.
I
tried
out
ES
Knights,
it's
it's
not
that
it's
not
well
done
or
well
built.
B
It's
that
it's
not
a
style
of
game
that
I
enjoy,
where
you
don't
actually
control
the
characters,
you
sort
of
level
them
up
and
power
them
up
and
give
them
armor,
and
then
they
automatically
fight
other
enemies
sort
of
on
your
behalf.
But
it's
worth
checking
out.
If
you,
google,
us,
Knights
or
I,
believe
it's
yes
night
Co,
you
can
go
check
it
out
and
play
it
a
little
bit.
B
A
B
Maybe
I
mean
there
have
been
so
many
different
dice
games
that
have
launched
on
pretty
much
every
platform
now,
but
what's
interesting
about
EOS,
better
I
guess
new
about
a
u.s.
bet.
Vs.
efj
bet
is
that
everything
happens
instantly
confirms
instantly
because
it
is
on
EOS
and
you're,
also
not
paying
that
dollar
transaction
fee.
So
people
can
do
a
variety
of
different
bets.
You
know
in
the
past,
if
you
wanted
to
bet
20
cents
and
do
that
on
a
theorem
you're,
also
paying
that
dollar
doesn't
make
sense.
B
A
A
B
Yeah
I
mean,
if
you
go
to
us
bet,
you
can
see
all
of
the
different
bets
that
are
happening.
You
can
see
whether
they
won
or
lost
how
much
they
won
or
lost
based
on
the
dice
it
I,
don't
personally
recommend
it,
but
it's
because
I
don't
personally
gamble
other
than
like
bets
with
friends
that
are
just
sort
of
fun.
Yeah.
B
Called
me
out
on
that
Twitter
know
it's
a
good
point,
but
I
mean
with
dice
games.
You
know
they
tell
you
straight
up
that
the
house
always
wins
even
if
you're
doing
49
51
odds,
you're
gonna
lose
in
the
long
term,
but
it's
a
fun
game
to
play
to
you
know,
see
the
power
of
us
and
see
how
quickly
it
all
confirms
what.
A
I
think
is
cool
about
these
games
are
like
it's
like
cleanest
slot
machine.
Just
you
repetitively
hit
the
button
and
keep
reeling
the
dice.
So
it's
actually
adding
a
lot
of
transactions
to
the
network
to
really
show
its
true
speed.
Oh
yeah
I
saw
something
on
Reddit
said
it
had
a
really
high
number
of
like
40
40
thousand
transactions
or
something
within
the
24
hour
period.
Oh.
B
A
Could
be
wrong
on
that
I!
Don't
have
this
that
right
in
front
of
me
I'm
looking
on
block
tivity,
though,
and
it's
saying
our
record
TPS
for
a
day-
is
10
million
one
hundred
one
thousand
seven
hundred
twenty-five
yeah
for
the
whole
network.
So
I
don't
know
what
that
works
out
per
hour,
but
that's
pretty
damn.
B
B
You
have
to
use
scatter
to
interface
with
all
that
they're
actually
working
on
mobile
support,
so
once
their
mobile
app
is
ready,
even
though
it
won't
be
a
hardware
wallet
like
block
ones,
upcoming
wallet
which
I
would
use
over
scatter
at
that
point,
but
in
the
meantime,
you'll
be
able
to
play
games
like
ES
nights
and
play
you
know.
Bedding
games
like
us
bet
right
on
your
phone,
so
imagine
you're
sitting
on
the
train.
You
know
on
your
way
to
work
sitting
in
a
taxi.
A
Maybe
their
own
wallet
yeah
we're
the
block
one,
hopefully
yeah,
so
I
asked
I,
asked
Josh
and
Kevin
their
thoughts,
so
Dan's
been
teasing
some
sort
of
announcement
at
the
London
hackathon,
that's
gonna,
be
on
September,
22nd
and
23rd
in
London.
It's
going
to
be
the
third
event
of
the
global
hackathon
series
and
then
the
fourth
one's
coming
up
in
November
has
announced
that
it's
going
to
be
in
San
Francisco
yeah,
which
was
also
big
news.
So
what
do
you
think
we're
gonna
see
at
the
London
hackathon,
the
more
I
think
about.
B
It,
the
more
I,
tend
to
agree
with
you
and
sort
of
build
off
of
your
idea,
so
I
honestly
think
we're
going
to
see
finally
that
iOS
hardware
wallet
from
block
1
and
to
your
point
about
limiting
abuse
of
people
signing
up
so
for
those
that
don't
know
through
this
hardware
wallet
that
uses
the
secure
Enclave
chip
in
your
iPhone
and
basically
turns
your
iPhone
into
a
ledger
or
a
treasure
wallet
and
makes
storing
your
coins.
Super
super
secure,
keeps
your
private
keys.
Offline
block.
B
1
is
said
that
users
who
sign
up
through
that
wallet
will
be
given
free
use
accounts,
which
basically
means
that
block
1
is
covering
the
couple
bucks
that
it
takes
to
generate
a
new
account
and
pay
for
that
ram.
But
in
order
to
prevent
people
from
just
signing
up
a
thousand
accounts
and
and
abusing
the
system
and
draining
block
1
of
all
their
money,
they
have
to
have
some
kind
of
spam
prevention.
B
What
makes
more
sense
than
anything
is
biometric
ID,
so
using
that
iOS
hardware
wallet
in
order
to
use
it
in
order
to
sign
transactions,
are
gonna
sign
transactions
either
with
your
face.
If
your
phone
has
face
ID
or
with
your
fingerprint,
if
your
phone
has
touch
ID,
but
whichever
one
you
use,
you're
sort
of
linking
all
of
your
transactions
to
your
biometric
ID,
so
I
would
not
be
surprised
to
see
block
one
also
release
some
kind
of
an
identity
solution
and
say:
hey.
B
You
can
sign
up
and
get
a
free
wallet
as
long
as
you
link
your
fingerprint
or
your
face.
Id
to
this,
get
that
free
wallet
and
they're
also
building
out
their
sort
of
identity
platform,
and
the
reason
why
I
think
this
makes
sense
for
them
from
a
business
perspective
is
every
business
whether
you're
a
software
company,
or
you
know
us
on
a
podcast.
We
all
have
you
know
a
cost
per
customer.
B
So
it's
something
that
I
think
makes
a
ton
of
sense
and
is
what
I'm
hoping
is
launched.
I
hope
that
they
come
out
and
say:
hey
here's,
our
iOS
hardware,
wallet,
here's
the
identity,
solution
to
prevent
abuse
of
us,
giving
out
free
accounts,
and
that
alone,
just
the
horror
wallet,
but
also
the
identity
solution,
would
offer
up.
So
many
new
use
cases
for
us
that
I'm
really
hoping
it's
that,
but
I
I
also
recognize
that
it
could
be
a
hundred
other
things
as
well.
Yeah.
A
That's
why
I
mentioned
they're
not
gonna,
give
away
free
accounts
without
some
sort
of
spam
protection
absolutely
and
I'm,
trying
to
like
dig
into
more
details
to
try
to
figure
out.
What's
going
on
and
I've,
never
really
I've
heard
he
in
Gregg's
name
a
lot
he's
a
block
one
employee,
but
I
never
really
dug
into
his
background
much
so
the
more
I
dug
into
the
background,
the
more
he
has
he
does
hold
presentations
on
identity.
Oh
really,.
B
A
Like
it's
like
one
of
his
specialties
and
he's
got
his
own
project
he's
working
on
like
Africa,
where
he's
trying
to
basically
crowdsource
like
loans
and
all
kinds
of
crazy
stuff,
but
involves
identity
and
as
soon
as
I
get
more
time,
you
gonna
try
to
dig
deeper
into
it.
So
I
could
share
my
findings
with
everyone,
but
his
knowledge
of
decentralized
identity
runs
deep.
That's
amazing,
deep.
B
And
if
you
think
about
it,
decentralized
identity
is
something
that
so
many
cryptid
projects
have
tried
to
solve.
For
so
long,
Civic
is
sort
of
the
main
one
that
I
think
uses
your
phone
number,
but
can
still
be
abused
in
that
way.
So
linking
something
to
Hardware
wallet
that
uses
your
fingerprint
or
your
face
through
face
ID
is
something
that
you
can't
fake,
something
that
you
can't
go
out
and
get
a
bunch
more
of,
unless
you're
paying
people
to
give
them.
Your
fingerprint
yeah.
A
B
I
think
it's
worth
noting
that,
even
if
you
are
a
whale
that
wants
to
pay
people
to
give
them
your
fingerprint
you're,
not
gonna
pay
them
more
than
it
cost
to
make
a
Neos
account.
If
that's
four
dollars,
somebody
on
the
street
is
not
gonna
put
their
fingerprint
into
your
phone
for
four
dollars.
They're
gonna!
Look
at
you
like
you're,
crazy
and
call
the
police
I'm.
A
Absolutely
I'll
sum
all
of
the
voting
right.
Now
is
one
token
one
vote
and
I
think
that's
always
going
to
exist,
but
I
think
there
will
be
other
voting
methods
for
different
parts
of
the
u.s.
puzzle
here,
yeah
and
it
let's
say
I,
don't
think
this
will
happen.
But
if
block
producer
voting
went
to
one
US
account
one
vote
which
I'm
not
saying
this
will
happens.
I,
don't
think
it
will
happen.
A
B
For
you
absolutely
that's
why
I
think
biometric
makes
the
most
sense
I
mean
then
you're,
not
relying
on
a
phone
number
you're,
not
relying
on
a
government
ID,
which
some
people
don't
have
it's
very
accessible
for
anybody.
That
already
has
an
iPhone
or
a
Mac
that
you
know
has
those
features
built-in
mm-hmm
and.
A
B
A
As
far
as
Dan
teasing
things,
this
kind
of
came
about
in
the
u.s.
general
chat
someone
some
tap
developers
named
Steve
Harmon.
He
basically
said
at
current
pricing
that
he
has
about
two
hundred
thousand
users
that
they
want
to
move
over
to
the
es
main
net,
and
he
said
that
even
at
today's
price
would
cost
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
stake
to
create
these
accounts.
And
then
Dan
responded
directly
to
him
and
said:
if
users
sign
up
through
our
coming
service,
then
you
won't
have
to
pay
for
their
accounts
yep.
So
that's
all!
B
Yeah,
well,
it's
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
you
mentioned
I
think
this
was
in
telegram
one
of
the
things
that
people
sort
of
forget
is
through
our
coming
service
that
part
of
that
sentence.
People
just
assume,
oh,
if
your
user
sign
up
through
you,
know
the
hardware
wallet
and
then
they'll
get
a
free
account,
but
there's
a
service
that
goes
along
with
that
hardware
wallet
that
I
think
has
to
be
identity,
because
what
other
servers
can
also
simultaneously
prevent
abuse,
yeah.
A
B
A
B
Yeah
some
people
have
sort
of
brought
up
this
question:
hey,
don't
I
have
to
make
a
new
account
for
every
DAP
I
have
to
make
an
account
for
that
depth.
Specifically.
No
it's
it's
one
use
account
that
works
across
every
single
guest,
app,
so
by
block
one
doing
this
and
bringing
all
these
people
into
the
ecosystem.
These
are
people
that
now
can
use
any
of
the
hopefully,
at
that
point,
hundreds
of
DAPs
that
exist
on
AOS,
totally
free
without
making
any
new
accounts
or
anything
so.
A
Another
big
news
that
came
out
actually
before
last
week's
episode,
but
we
didn't
do
a
regular
recap:
here's
the
launch
of
the
EOS
Alliance
yeah
and
the
EOS
Alliance.
They
published
a
mandate
and
it
says
the
EOS
Alliance
will
serve
under
its
guiding
vision
of
empowering
EOS
for
all
to
curate
and
coordinate
various
existing
efforts
within
the
EOS
community.
The
Alliance
will
facilitate
multi-language
conversations
initially
in
English
Korean
and
Chinese,
and
educate
around
key
ecosystem
issues.
A
Debates
and
developments
they're
going
to
refrain
in
accordance
to
its
bylaws,
which
are
now
being
drafted
from
gaining
any
executive
power
within
the
EOS
governance
structures
and
they're
also
going
to
facilitate
discussion
and
help
among
workgroups
to
make
clear
recommendations
as
its
first
act.
The
EOS
Alliance
has
already
begun,
forming
a
series
of
working
groups
with
diverse
community
participation
to
inform,
advise
and
advise
on
the
EOS
ecosystems,
most
challenging
topics.
B
A
B
So
essentially,
the
EOS
Alliance
will
have
seven
core
board
members
that
are
appointed,
that
oversee
the
Alliance,
make
sure
everything's
running
properly
and
then
have
a
series
of
sort
of
sub
directors
based
around
different
topics.
So
there'll
be
seven
people
that
talk
and
discuss
about
the
Constitution,
seven
people
that
talk
and
discuss
about
working
proposal,
fund,
seven
people
that
do
things
on
block
producers
or
governance.
A
What
I
thought
was
interesting,
is
they
capped
their
annual
budget
to
a
million
dollars
per
year?
Yeah.
That's
basically
saying
hey
this.
Isn't
some
big
money
grab
we're
not
just
trying
to
get
us
all
a
bunch
of
huge
salaries,
we're
capping
the
finance
for
this
entire
organization
at
a
million
dollars
per
year?
Absolutely.
B
B
So
because
I
am
a
CEO
of
cypher
glass,
a
block
producer
I,
presumably,
would
not
be
able
to
participate,
and
neither
would
any
other
blog
producers
but
I
think
that's
a
good
thing
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
avoid
conflict
of
interest
and
avoid
any
parties
from
gaining
too
much
power
within
the
ecosystem.
What.
A
A
I
don't
know
much
about
his
back.
I
know
he's
a
big
blockchain
enthusiast.
He
has
been
doing
doing.
He
has
a
project
I
think
in
Africa
he's
working
on
so
I'm,
not
gonna
like
take
a
stab
at
his
credibility,
he's
probably
very
knowledgeable
but
from
me
on
the
outside.
Looking
in
I'm,
just
like
a
con
and.
B
A
B
I
mean
I'm
I'm
all
for
anybody
joining
the
US
ecosystem,
regardless
of
your
past
background,
whether
you're,
a
platinum
artist
like
he
was
or
you're
somebody
else
that
hasn't
done
anything
in
your
life
before
I'm,
all
in
favor
of
you
joining,
and
it's
interesting
to
notice
here,
actually
that
a
couple
of
the
chair,
a
couple
of
the
core
people
on
the
board
are
members
of
block
producers.
So
maybe
that's
not
a
conflict
of
interest
that
they're
looking
at,
we
have
Bank
or
yes,
gravity,
Yost
or
I.
Think
that's
it.
B
B
A
Totally
fun
and
then
some
other
big
names
associated
with
the
u.s.
alliances,
Kevin
Wilcox,
who
I'm
guessing
probably
played,
played
a
major
role
of
launching
this
he's
going
to
be
the
communications
director
and
also
Thomas
Cox,
who
used
to
work
for
block
one
he's
gonna
serve
as
the
interim
executive
director,
yeah
and
I'm.
Assuming
that
he'll
be
the
permanent
executive
director
he'll
get
voted
in
I
would.
B
Agree
in
a
second
and
I
think
you
know.
A
lot
of
this
is
interesting
to
see
two
people
who
used
to
be
at
block
one
now
sort
of
running
this
I
think
it's
it's
good
I
mean
I.
Think
even
though
they're
not
working
at
block
one
any
more
I'm
sure
that
they're
sort
of
carrying
over
some
of
the
opinions
that
block
one
has,
and
you
know
in
forming
the
Alliance
and
inform
the
community
of
what
block
one
wants
to
do
in
addition
to
what
the
community
wants
to
do.
B
A
One
of
the
big
initiatives
with
the
EOS
Alliance
is
they
need
a
group.
They
need
a
lot
of
volunteers.
They
need
a
lot
of
thought
leaders.
They
need
a
lot
of
people
with
a
strong
opinion
on
how
the
governance
should
work
and
a
lot
of
these
other
issues.
So
actually
this
Monday
and
this
upcoming
Tuesday,
that's
the
27th
and
the
28th.
The
EOS
Alliance-
is
actually
hosting
open
conference
calls
for
anyone
in
the
community
who
wants
to
volunteer
to
be
part
of
some
of
these
smaller
working
groups.
A
B
B
And
exactly
I
think
you
know
it's
important
to
keep
in
mind
that,
after
a
lot
of
these
constitutional
articles
are
proposed,
it's
then
up
to
a
referendum
of
the
community
to
basically
tell
the
block
producers
hey.
We
want
this
article.
We
don't
want
that
one.
We
want
these
three,
but
we
don't
want
those
of
the
three.
So
it's
gonna
be
cool
to
see
what
people
end
up
voting
on
and
what
the
community
really
values
when
it
comes
to
the
Constitution.
So.
A
B
B
So
the
honestly,
the
biggest
driving
force
behind
this
is
when
we
think
about
block
one
voting
in
the
future,
once
they're
a
minority
voter,
meaning
they're,
not
you
know
fifty
percent
or
more
of
the
total
votes
with
their
hundred
million
and
they
decide
to
vote.
One
of
the
things
that
Dan
mentioned
is
that
he
would
really
like
to
be
able
to
vote
for
fifty
or
more
even
a
hundred
or
more,
even
an
infinite
number
of
block
producers.
B
If
we
think
about
somebody
like
block
one
who
is
the
biggest
beneficiary
or
the
system
owns,
10%
of
the
tokens
has
presumably
the
best
interest
of
the
network
at
heart.
The
ability
for
them
to
then
vote
for
a
hundred
people
versus
thirty
allows
them
to
remove
some
of
these
quote-unquote
fake
block
producers
or
block
producers.
That
aren't,
you
know,
complying
with
the
block
producer
agreement.
Block
producers
like
Jetta,
and
there
were
a
few
others
that
have
been
totally
anonymous
like
us.
B
Cleaner,
would
basically
allow
them
to
sort
of
push
those
people
out
by
voting
for
the
hundred
plus,
maybe
two
hundred,
plus
that
they
believe
to
be
legitimate.
But
in
addition,
when
you
think
about
our
current
state
before
block
one
votes,
giving
people
the
ability
to
vote
for
a
hundred
people
that
they
want
versus
thirty
allows
us
to
spread
the
votes
out
more
and
as
a
result,
spread
the
payments
out
more
by
giving
people
more
options
of
who
to
choose
from
and
more
slots
to
fill
so
to
speak.
B
If
I
have
a
hundred
years,
tokens
I
can
give
those
hundred
US
votes
to
one
hundred.
If
and
block,
producers
will
actually
end
up
with
more
stand
by
block
producers,
so
I
think
it's
a
way
for
us
to
get
more
stand
by
block
producers
like
a
lot
of
people
have
been
wanting
without
reducing
the
requirement
below
the
hundred
US
pale
per
dead.
So
it's
a
way
to
achieve
that.
A
A
B
And
you
know
this
is
something
where
we
really
just
wanted
to
start
a
conversation
where
we
know
the
exact
proposal
we
put
out
will
likely
not
be
the
one.
If
anyone
does
get
approved,
it
won't
be
the
one
that
gets
approved
it'll
be
some
sort
of
modified
version
of
that.
But
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
people
out.
There
mainly
proxies
that
I
think
are
going
to
want
to
vote
for
more
than
thirty
that
still
meet
their
requirements.
B
You
know
there
have
been
cases
where
we're
talking
with
a
proxy
trying
to
you
know,
get
their
vote
where
they
have
to
unload
someone
else
or
in
order
for
them
to
bring
on
somebody
that
meets
their
proxy
requirements
better
than
we
do.
They
have
to
leave
us
off
so
for
them
to
have
the
ability
to
add
more
than
thirty
votes.
I
think
would
make
a
massive
impact
on
the
ecosystem.
You.
A
B
I
would
support
that,
but
I
don't
see
a
reason
why
individuals
need
to
have
a
different
limit,
then
yeah,
then
then
the
proxies,
especially
since
you
don't
have
to
cast
the
full
30
or
the
full
hundred.
You
mean
that's
one
if
you
want
to,
but
it
gives
you
the
flexibility
and
the
ability
to
do
that.
Then
do.
B
I,
don't
know
that
number
now.
That
would
be
interesting
to
see,
though
there
are
a
lot
of
interesting.
Some
other
block
producers
have
some
pretty
cool
stats,
I
can't
think
of
the
name
off
the
top,
my
head
at
the
website,
but
there
are
a
bunch
of
different
tools.
You
can
see
a
block
producer
votes.
Maybe
that's
one
of
the
metrics,
if
not
would
be
cool
to
see
that
I'd
be
curious.
A
Of
one
the
average
of
everybody
and
then
the
other
one
would
probably
be
a
more
manual
analytic
of
like
looking
at
the
big
wheel,
wallets
I've,
seen
the
different
voting
tools
where
you
could
see
kind
of
the
bar
charts
with
right,
solid
colors
for
the
huge
wallets
and
seeing
if
how
many
of
those
huge
wallets
are
only
voting
for
like
five
or
less
bp's
yeah.
It's
ensure
there's
cases
of
that
I'm,
just
not
sure.
If
how
big
of
an
issue
it
is
right,
I,
just
don't
have
the
time
to
look
into
that.
I
think.
B
That's
a
good
place
to
stop.
One
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
start
doing
is
getting
more
feedback
from
you
guys
so
you're,
obviously
leaving
great
comments
in
our
youtube
channel
or
on
soundcloud
you're.
You
know
letting
us
know
by
subscribing
that
you
like
the
show,
but
if
there's
a
topic
that
you
hear
about,
maybe
we
haven't
heard
of
it.
Maybe
we
have
or
an
interesting
article
that
you
read
that
you
think
would
you
know,
benefit
us
here
on
the
show
you
think
we
could
have
an
interesting
discussion
on
please
tweet
at
us.
B
My
analyst
Finch
fi
Zak's
is
blockchain
Zak
with
a
k'
tweeted
at
us,
and,
let
us
know
hey.
You
know
mention
this
on
next
week's
everything
else.
We
we
want
to
hear
about
this
or
hey.
What's
the
status
on
RAM,
if
you
have
any
questions
about
EES
that
you
sort
of
want
us
to
discuss
and
give
you
an
update
on,
please
do
let
us
know
and
we'd
love
to
discuss
it
here
on
the
podcast.
Alright,.
A
So
I
think
that
covers
everything
for
this
week.
We
look
forward
to
talking
to
you
guys
next
week
and
like
Rob
said,
let
us
know
what
you
guys
want
us
to
talk
about
we're
we're
open
to
bringing
on
more
guests.
We
want
to.
We
want
to
talk
about
some
of
these
governance
issues.
More
yes,
Alliance
issues,
I
kind
of
talked
to
Thomas
Cox,
a
little
bit
we're
gonna,
try
having
him
on
and
to
talk
about
the
u.s.
alliance.
B
See
it
is
August.
Yes,
he
did
say
he
started
on
the
14th
Lea
Ribeiro,
who
was
doing
some
great
work
for
us
on
our
windshield
monitoring
tool
on
glass,
which
is
our
transparency
tool,
all
kinds
of
stuff.
Now
it
was
a
full-time
employee
at
block
one.
So
we
were
sad
to
see
him
go,
but
also
very
excited
that
you
know
he
has
this
opportunity
to
go
and
work
for
you
know
now
what
I
think
is
probably
one
of
the
most
promising
companies
in
the
world.
Yes,.
A
B
What
he
mentioned,
you
know,
pending
their
approval,
that
he
would
love
to
come
on
the
show
and
sort
of
be
a
tech
consultant
for
us.
So
explaining
some
things
like
the
eos
rex
market,
when
you're
gonna
be
able
to
lend
out
your
eos
explaining
other
complex
technical
issues
that
he
can
do.
A
better
job
of
explaining,
since
he
is
a
developer,
is
a
programmer
in
sort
of
developing
now,
on
top
of
he
owes
at
block.