►
From YouTube: EOS MANDEL Meeting #10 (April 13th 2022)
Description
All EOS Mandel Meetings : https://github.com/EOS-Nation/mandel/...
#eos #mandel
Everything EOS is the official media channel of the EOS Network Foundation (ENF). The EOS Network Foundation coordinates financial and non-financial support to encourage the growth and development of the EOS Network. We’re harnessing the power of decentralization to chart a coordinated future for the EOS Network as a force for positive global change.
// EOS Network Foundation //
https://eosn.foundation
https://twitter.com/EosNFoundation
https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos-...
https://t.me/EOSNetworkFoundation
https://discord.gg/eos-network
info@eosn.foundation
#EOS #EOSIO #ENF
A
All
right
we're
rolling
it's
april
13th.
This
is
our
10th
time
meeting
now.
As
a
group,
I've
got
the
agenda
or
the
summary
up
from
last
week
and
quickly
go
over
just
to
refresh
our
memories.
We
talked
about
transaction
lifecycle
features
last
week
how
they're
currently
tracking
towards
june,
to
be
available
for
start
testing
in
jungle.
We've
got
two
of
the
new
enf
engineers
joining
today.
I
think
we
might
even
have
some
of
them
on
the
call.
We
talked
about
mandel
testing
on
jungle,
eos
nation
has
a
bunch
of
our
nodes.
B
Date,
I'd
like
to
add
an
item
for
today.
If,
if
it's
permitted
to
the
agenda
anyways,
it
is
to
revisit
an
old
item
which
I
believe
you
have
closed,
where
we
discussed
the
versions
or
essentially
the
software,
what
we
would
support
or
would
you
be
able
to
either
I
see
that
randall's
on
the
call,
either
through
eos
support
or
through
pomelo
pomelo's,
probably
the
combination
of
both
send
out
a
questionnaire
to
because
now
we
have
145
applicants
which
represent,
I
think,
a
really
good
representation
of
the
developers
on
eosword
good
chunk
anyways.
B
B
B
For
intel
architecture
or
for
arm
as
well-
oh
that's
why
I'm
saying
standard
so
arm
is
the
m1
and
doesn't
exist
at.
D
B
C
B
B
What
that
means?
It's
just
not!
We
don't
know
what
that
means
yet,
but
we
just
need
that
first
part
of
whether
or
not
we
should
drop
it
or
keep
it,
and
I
think
that
through
pomelo,
because
we've
got
outreach
to
a
lot
of
developers
right
now,
it
would
give
us
a
better
sense
which
would
be
outside
of
the
block
producers
of
whether
or
not
people
the
community
would
value
at
keeping
max
support.
If
the
answer
is
yes,
then
we
can
figure
out.
B
How
do
we
support
it
afterwards
and
then
what
you
mentioned
stan
becomes
relevant,
but
for
now
just
the
first
part.
Oh
I
mean
we
have
experts
in
the
community,
so
yeah
we've
already
has
this
discussion
in
this
call.
These
people
have
already
weighed
in
I'm
asking
to
do
a
questionnaire
specifically
for
the
people
in
pomelo,
because
there's
145
applicants
it
will
give
us
a
much
broader
data
input
than
the
people
that
are
typically
on
this
call.
We
already
know
the
people
on
this
call
what
their
preference
was.
We
ended
up,
dropping
max
support,
yeah.
A
So
we're
happy
to
send
out
a
survey
to
the
pamela
users.
We
need
some
help
crafting
the
survey
questions
specifically,
maybe
there's
an
opportunity
to.
I
don't
know.
If
that's
the
only
question
while
we're
surveying
you,
maybe
there's
some
other
questions.
We
want
to
ask
at
the
same
time-
and
I
know
we're
talking.
A
We
might
be
getting
more
participation
that
way.
I'd
have
to.
I
haven't
done
that
before
we
have
to
experiment
with
that,
but
I'm
sure
there
is
click
a
button.
Yes,
no,
we
could
track
that
somehow
it's
not
something
we've
experimented
with
yet,
but
the
technology
exists
for
sure.
Do
we
what's
the
timelines
we're
looking
at?
How
soon
do
we
need
to
get
a
response
on
this?
Well.
B
B
145
or
so
actual
you
could
even
do
that.
The
ones
we
didn't
approve,
that's
fine
as
well
it'd
still
be
developers,
but
that
at
least
would
give
us.
You
know
even
a
50
reply,
a
good
at
least
70
responses,
or
something
like
that,
which
would
be
more
than
the
typical
20
we
have
here.
Okay
and
yeah.
I
think
wording
it
the
way
you
would
suggest
it
before
or
somewhere
thereof
might
be
better
than
do.
You
want
a
feature
right.
A
Yeah
I'll
think
about
that
wording,
a
little
more
and
we'll
need
to
give
some
context
in
there
about
mandel
coming
all
that
sort
of
stuff,
but
this
is
a
good
first
step.
Part
of
our
goal,
also
with
mandel
upgrade,
is
the
communication
strategy.
So
this
is
like
a
nice
first
dribble
of
a
engaged
population,
letting
them
know
that
this
is
coming
and
how
it
might
impact
them
and
getting
their
feedback.
So
I
think
that's
a
good
place
to
start.
Anyone
have
anything
to
add
on
that
topic.
B
A
Guys
it's
happy
to
have
you
are
we?
I
don't
know
if
we
have
any
updates
on
that,
there's
a
new
request.
I
saw.
I
don't
think
this
impacts.
I
don't
know
what
this
is
for
your
team
or
for
I
saw
matthew
post
this
request
to
back
port.
Another
feature
from
2.1.
I
see
kevin
has
commented
that
maybe
kevin
can
provide
some
context
if
he's
on
yeah.
E
A
E
B
Time
for
sure
great
are
there.
Other
features
that
you
know
of
kevin
that
aren't
currently
being
captured.
You
know,
would
be
worthwhile
capturing
in
the
short
term
to
include
in
3.1
and
then
some
that
would
be,
and
maybe
we
can
make
the
distinction
some
that
should
be
captured
but
might
not
fit
in
the
time
frame
of
what
we're
trying
to
achieve
with
3-1
but
still
should
be
captured
for
later
versions.
Yeah,
and
would
you
be
able
to
kind
of
make
a
list
of
that
or
or
we
can
help
you
out
with
that?
E
I
started
that
list.
It's
rather
involved
to
actually
do
a
detailed
list.
I
I
thought
at
first
it
would
be
fairly
easy,
but
there's
a
lot
to
to
be
frank,
so
I
did
start
a
list.
I
need
to
get
back
to
that
list
and
clean
it
up
and
make
it
complete,
and
I
just
haven't,
had
the
opportunity
to
do
so,
but
yeah
there.
B
E
E
But
not
all
of
them,
there's
I'd,
say
at
least
half
of
the
optimizations
and
two
one
are
not
in
too
low
and
so
yeah.
Those
should
be
a
backboard,
so
there's
optimization
and
then
there's
a
slew
of
features
as
well.
That
are
useful
from
things
block
striding,
which
I
know
is
something
that,
like
block
producers,
are
very
interested
in
to
actually
running
with
no
block
log
at
all.
It's
a
feature:
that's
over
there
on
esio's
side
as
well
to
a
whole
slew
of
other
kind
of
minor
things
like
logging
enhancements
and
myriad.
F
E
G
E
There's
a
number
of
things
that
you
know
that
were
found
via
dog
food.
It's
amazing
what
happens
when
you
actually
use
your
software.
You
know
in
terms
of
like
enhancements
that
who
would
have
known
those
of
us
that
were
screaming
actually
we're
breaking
stuff.
So
yeah
there's
a
lift.
We
should
work
on
that
list.
You
know
it's
one
of
those
things
that
like
if
I
was
to
sit
down
and
do
a
complete
list,
it
would
probably
take
you
know
a
day
and
a
half
of
time
maybe
longer
actually
create
the
list
itself.
D
E
I've
got
a
spreadsheet,
actually,
that's
a
stand
created
that
I've
been
filling
in,
but
it
needs
cleaned
up
and
it
needs
to
be
complete.
So
it's
it
was
just
a
bit
more
than
I
imagined
at
first
I
mean
you
have
to
remember
that
2-1
was
in
development
for
like
a
year
and
a
half
with
a
sizable
team,
so
yeah
there's
things
in
there
that
we
certainly
don't
want,
like
you
know,
prune
transaction
stuff,
which
is
just
a
mess,
but
there's
a
number
of
other
things
that
are
very
useful,
that
that
are
in
there.
E
So
you
know
it's
just
a
matter
of
calling
through
all
those
and
saying
yeah.
We
want
that.
No
that
doesn't
make
it
and
then
working
on
on
getting
them.
Then
backboarded
some
of
them
come
over
rather
cleanly.
Others
are
intermixed
with
the
pack
transaction
stuff,
which
makes
them
very
difficult.
For
example,
block
log
striding
is
intermixed
with
all
the
pruning
stuff
and
it
makes
it
very
difficult
to
backport,
we'll
probably
wind
up
almost
just
implementing
it
from
scratch
again,
so
you
know
that
that
comes
in
as
well,
so.
A
C
C
There's
additional
lists
of
yeah
there's
an
additional
list
of
features
which
might
be
useful
to
get
in,
but
I
haven't
updated
for
like
two
months.
I
need
to
go
through
them
again.
A
D
C
F
Point
we
want
to
make
sure
we
don't
bite
off
more
than
we
can
chew
and
delete
delay
the
3.1
release.
So
if
it's
helpful,
maybe
we
should
do
a
call.
You
know
once
stan
once
you've
updated
your
list
and
kevin.
You
have
a
list,
I
know
matt
wants
to
go
through
and
comb
stuff.
You
know
maybe
bucky
will
be
here
next
week.
F
I
know
a
lot
of
this
is
also
being
driven
by
the
api
working
group,
which
I'm
kind
of
loosely
following,
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
makes
sense
to
add
oregon
matt
into
that.
So
they
see
what
you
know.
Matthew
is
discovering
and
what's
going
on
with
these
lost
transactions.
I
think
that's
a
lot
of
what's
driving
some
of
this
right
now.
You
can
add
this.
E
D
E
Keep
hitting
things
it's
like!
Oh
yeah,
I
forgot,
that's
not
mandel,
yet
you
know
and
then
so
and
some
of
the
some
of
those
we've
actually
pulled
over
as
part
of
that
work.
Just
because
it's
like,
oh
you
know
it's
easier
to
just
go
ahead
and
pull
over.
What
we
need,
then,
to
you
know,
say:
well,
okay,
let's
get
it
later,
so
some
of
that
you
know
we're
getting
quote
unquote
for
free,
but
there's
plenty
of
other
stuff
that
that
needs
brought
over.
So.
A
I
guess,
can
I
leave
it
to
you
guys
to
coordinate
that
sounds
like
you're
going
to
make
sense
to
me
offline.
Just
you
know,
maybe
a
handful
of
you
and,
and
you
guys
can
report
back
with
what
you
come
up
with
in
the
coming
either
next
week
or
the
following
week.
I'm.
A
Thank
you
awesome
all
right
anything
else
as
it
pertains.
We
still
you
know
again.
Last
week
we
said
we're
tracking
towards
what
was
it
here
june
early
june,
to
be
ready
for
testing
on
jungle.
Any
reason
to
believe
that's
changed
all
right,
we're
still
good
for
that
awesome.
Testing
mandel
on
jungle
only
update
I
have
is
nation
now
has
the
remainder
of
our
nodes
on
jungle
have
been
upgraded
to
mandel.
The
only
ones
that
have
we
haven't
upgraded
yet
are
diffuse
nodes.
G
I
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
get
all
ours
upgraded,
but
I
did
see
some
questions.
I
I
do
plan
on
hopefully
testing
out
hyperion
on
305
I
mean,
is
it
worth
waiting
until
306
or
31
for
ship
for
anybody
that
may
have
insight
into
the
future
I'll
say
before
I
go
beat
my
head
on
this
version
and
the
whole
version.
Sorry
for
beating.
B
G
But
every
now
and
then
kevin
will
just
be
like
oh
yeah,
that
completely
changed
it's
global
v
sequence,
one
versus
zero.
Now
or
something
so
I
just
generally
ask
if
anybody
had
any
yeah.
You
might
wait
a
month.
Let
me
know,
but
I
do
plan
on
trying
to
tackle
that
once
all
my
dumpster
fires
are
extinguished
all.
A
A
Anyone
else
have
anything
to
add
on
jungle
testing
all
right,
we'll
continue
to
report
back
in
right
now,
nothing
everything's
from
what
we've
seen
is
running
smoothly,
we're
looking
forward
to
getting
defuse
running
on
there
too.
What
else
we
got
here?
Can
we
stan?
Do
you
have
any
updates
on
the
you
know,
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
list
you
put
together.
Are
we
getting
close
to?
Maybe
you
and
I
collaborating
on
assembling
some
of
the
material
you
put
together
in
a
package.
A
A
We're
still,
what
are
we
shooting
for
september?
Is
the
real
big
scary
day
that
people
need
to
worry
about
shouldn't,
be
scary,
we're
going
to
make
it
we're
going
to
make
it
smooth,
but
we'll
be
good
to
get
probably
by
by
august,
when
our
vps
are
upgraded.
We
want
to
have
some
good
communication,
I
think,
with
all
the
resources
and
what
we've
learned
from
that
upgrade.
So
we
still
got
some
time
but
yeah,
let's
not
lose
sight
of
the
time,
passing
I'm
also
going
to
put
together
a
very
high
level.
A
I
said
this
a
few
calls
ago.
I
still
haven't
gotten
to
it,
I'm
in
the
same
boat
as
you
stand
too
many
priorities
at
once,
but
I
think
we're
I'm
in
pretty
good
shape
that
by
next
week
I
should
have
a
very
high
level
summary
of
the
state
of
mandel.
What
our
goals
are?
It's
something
we
can
start
sharing
on
twitter
and
publicly,
and
you
know,
make
sure
everyone's
aware
of
the
high
level
goals
here.
A
What
else
I
think
that's
are
there
any
other
things
that
we're
keeping
an
eye
on
we'll
revisit
docker
april
27th
yeah?
I
don't
know
if
matt
or
arig
wanna
wanted
to
say
a
few
words
or
anyone
else
have
anything
to
add
all
right
I'll.
Take
that
as
a
no
and
we
can
wrap
things
up
and
I'll
post
the
summary
shortly
and
we'll
see
y'all
next
week.
Thank
you.
Bye.