►
From YouTube: Compliance weekly - 2023-05-16
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
welcome
to
the
compliance
weekly
sync
for
the
16th
of
May.
The
first
order
of
business
is
to
walk
the
Milestone
board.
Is
there
anyone
else
that
wants
to
share
this
screen.
C
C
B
C
Yeah,
that
was
just
some
dark,
update
and
I
think
adding
a
little
tool
tip
for
status
check
so
that
users
had
more
info
without
merged
and
verified.
A
I
can
talk
the
create
and
edit
compliance
Frameworks
report
that
Elia
completed.
This
was
one
of
our
release
posts
for
this
Milestone
as
well
now
and
the
compliance
framework
report
you
can
create
and
edit
the
Frameworks
themselves,
rather
than
having
to
go
all
the
way
into
the
groups
set
in
general
settings,
which
makes
it
a
lot
easier
to
edit
and
create
them
and
add
them
to
projects.
So
it's
a
great
bit
of
work.
A
I
think
Jay
did
you
do
the
verify
the
export
one.
C
Yeah
I
was
gonna
just
say,
I
think
I
verified
that
one
and
I
also
was
the
reviewer
for
customer,
so
yeah
the
compliance
framework
report
export
and
it's
been
working
on
that
and
verified
that
we
now
can
export
the
Frameworks
on
the
page
and
seems
like
it's
working
properly.
Emails
are
sent
pretty
much
promptly
and
everything
is
working
as
this.
It's
good.
C
And
then
for
the
other
one
I'm
just
trying
to
find
that
more
for
that,
if
I
remember
correctly,
the
email
was
designed
for
audit
events
and
I
just
can't
find
the
Mr
right
now.
B
B
B
If
that
is
what
actually
was
the
root
cause
of
that
issue
those
encountered,
but
it
was
basically
if
a
cash
refresh
paled,
for
example,
Reddit
is
being
down
that
would
cause
it
to
situation
where
the
audit
event
would
not
be
created,
even
if
the
protective
Branch
was
removed.
So
I
basically
added
just
some
code
to
prevent
that
from
happening,
and
hopefully
hopefully
that
was
the
root
cause,
but
no
real
way
to
know
for
sure
other
than
see
if
Dickerson
so.
B
Fixed
Edge
and
key
step
vegetation:
this
is
just
some
refactoring
of
the
helper
use
in
some
specs,
not
really
a
big
change.
There.
D
A
Follow-Ups
around
the
message
when
you're
filtering
the
violations
report
and
also
not
it
would
have
adding
debounce
into
the
UI
as
well.
A
In
the
set
instance
level,
external
audit
event
destination,
that
was
the
what
hadesh
has
completed,
and
this
is
all
of
the
apis.
Now,
for
the
instance
level,
streaming
audit
events
I
know,
he's
still
working
on
adding
emitting
all
the
order,
events
and
then
on
the
headers
and
event
filters.
But
this
is
the
first
step
towards
that.
We
have
all
the
apis
ready
foreign.
A
I
can
talk
to
those
two
as
well:
the
inform
user
win
compliance
framework
report,
filtered
results,
have
changed.
Elia
had
completed
this,
so
in
the
compliance
framework
report
we
knew
filter
and
then
apply
a
framework
to
one
or
a
subset
of
those
projects.
A
The
the
results
don't
update,
so
it
can
show
project
view
with
the
wrong
results
as
part
of
that
filter,
so
it
pops
up
with
a
little
dialogue,
just
asking
to
refresh
the
search
and
the
disable
compliance
pipeline
field
and
the
compliance
Frameworks
for
premium
users.
A
B
C
Oop
are
you
muted
and
that
one
we
had
initially
wanted
that,
so
that
owners
could
see
the
full
external
sales
check
URL
after
some
reviews
in
the
Mr
and
some
talk
with
app
that
we
decided
to
just
strip
all
tokens
from
the
URL
displayed
the
status
check.
So
that's
no
longer
displayed
from
the
configurations
page
just
not
on
each
Mr
status,
check.
C
I
was
on
the
verifier,
so
that
one
is
mostly
good.
It's
just
the
streaming
audit
s
for
when
you
create
a
merge
request
and
then
either
merge
it
and
destroy,
or
if
it's
not
merged
yet
and
destroy
it
just
having
those
come
through
the
streaming
logs.
It's
mostly
coming
through
there's
just
one
issue
that
I
observed
with
it
not
showing
the
merged
by
ID,
and
otherwise
it's
pretty
good
but
yeah.
Just
waiting
on
a
reply
on
that.
One.
B
Compliance
weekly
this
one
Aaron
I'd,
see
girl
the
verifier
on
it.
You're
not
really
going
to
be
able
to
verify
this.
This
is
index
to
production
and
it's
got
to
be
done
in
like
three
separate
word
trusts
and
this
first
one
it
is
already
merged
in,
but
it
will
run
over
the
weekend.
B
You
got
merged
Friday,
but
it
didn't
get
merged
early
enough
to
run
this
past
weekend.
So
you
can't
really
do
anything
until
Monday,
so
just
a
heads
up
and
further
verification,
there's
just
chat
ops
command,
that
I
posted
in
a
comment
on
the
issue
or
on
the
mergeros
or
issue
I.
Think
of
the
issue
that
you
run
so,
but
nothing
to
do
with
that.
One
right
now.
B
Cool
in
review
those
anyone
have
something
they
want
to
call
out
use.
First,
three.
B
Yeah,
probably
not
did
anything
you
want
to
say
about
this
one.
There.
D
Yes,
so
that
one
is
like
95
done,
there
is
one
Mr
that
is
still
out
that
harsavar
and
I
have
been
going
back
and
forth
on,
because
we
were
having
some
test
failures
in
the
predictive
tests
in
in
CI
and
I
had
the
time
to
look
at
that
last
night
and
I
think
what's
causing.
D
That
is
because
we
made
changes
to
the
the
audit
method
for
emails
and
because
a
lot
of
these
services
do
generate
emails
as
part
of
what
they
do
what's
happening
is
in
the
specs,
where
the,
where
the
mocks
are
expecting
audit
event,
service
or
audit
event
or
auditor
audit
to
be
called
with
the
serves
in
question
now.
D
I'm
gonna
try
and
get
that
done
as
soon
as
I
can
this
week,
it's
it's
not
difficult.
It's
just
going
to
be
a
lot
of
digging
around
and
making
sure
I
can
just
get
the
test
to
pass.
But
that's
that's
the
reason.
That's
the
only
thing
holding
up
that
this
issue.
At
this
point
everything
else,
the
other
Mrs
that
were
related
to
the
user.
Refactor
are
all
in
verification-
have
been
closed
at
this
point.
So
so
that's
where
we
are
in
that.
C
B
Cool
I
I,
just
gotta,
assign
this
bug
that
came
off
in
some
browser.
Ui
testing.
B
I
read
through
the
issue
and
it
wasn't
really
clear
if
this
happens
or
can
happen
in
sort
of
real
app
code
or
if
it's
just
a
situation
that
you
could
get
in
based
on
how
you
can
Mark
out
different
dependencies
of
other
events
in
past,
but
either
way
the
actual
bug
was
in
presenter
code
like
rendering
a
URL
to
display
in
you
know
the
UI,
so
it
seemed
reasonable
just
to
say
if
there
is
no
URL,
because
some
dependencies
got
deleted,
returning
an
empty
string
for
the
UI
seems
resemble.
B
So
that's
all
I
did
in
this
open
to
merge
requests.
Wait
did
see
if
anyone
has
other
opinions
on
it,
something
else
has
to
be
done
and
then
improve
self
walking.
B
It
is
get
an
update
for
the
office
right
now,
anything
in
Dev.
Anyone
wanted
to
talk
about.
B
C
Oh
sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
see
for
workers.
Does
anyone
know
if
you
can
set
the
time
at
which
a
worker
runs
like
the
interval
other
than
the
pre-defined
urgency?
Consistencies
I
think
that's
what
it
was.
C
Just
ideally
want
this
new
worker
that
I
have
in
Dev
to
run
pretty
frequently
and
at
a
set
time.
So
I
was
just
gonna.
Ask
the
question
in
here
see.
B
Yeah,
you
can
do
a
fun
file,
work
group,
job.
C
Because
it
has
like
default
consistencies
and
urgencies
that
kind
of
schedules
it
in
the
queue
I
was
just
wondering
if
there
was
a
way
to
specify
a
certain
time.
If
anyone
knew
before
I
did
a
deep
search.
B
B
So,
okay,
thanks
yeah
and
then
I'll
just
say
for
this
API:
this
is
blocked
by
the
not
block,
but
in
adding
the
indexes,
all
the
those
merge
requests
have
to
land
in
production
before
this
one
can
be
merged
and
I
just
realized
it's
actually
in
review.
B
So
this
is
for
the
application
code
and
it's
in
review
and
it
has
one
sign
off.
So
it's
kind
of
a
maintainer
review.
I,
don't
think
the
maintain
has
gotten
to
it
yet
so.
A
Okay,
I
did
one.
There
was
one
other
and
see
if
the
other
one
there
excuse
me
the
front
end
for
the
instance.
Level
ordered
event
streaming.
So
there's
one
email
already
been
merged
for
this.
That
adds
the
tab
behind
a
feature
flag
and
there's
a
second
Emma.
That's
up
at
the
moment.
A
B
A
Joseference
doing
the
adherence
report,
technical
implementation
planning
breakdown,
he
has
a
solid
plan
in
place,
but
there
is
a
few
assumptions
there
that
we're
just
waiting
on
Derek
to
confirm
around
using
something
or
things
such
as
it'll,
be
at
a
project
level
and
we're
going
to
use
compliance
Frameworks
to
apply
the
tags
to
them
in
certain
things.
So
once
we
get
that,
we
can
accumulate
that
implementation
plan
and
then
start
building
out
the
issues
for
next
Milestone
to
get
stuck
into
it.
B
These
two
are
blocked
by
things
that
need
to
be
done
first
and
the
one
that
needs
to
be
done.
First,
is
actually
in
review.
B
I.
Just
don't
think
it's
gonna
make
sixteen
dollars.
So
it's
a
16
that
one,
but
it
is
in
review
and
has
one
sign
off,
and
the
maintainer
review
from
the
back
end
is
got
some
feedback.
But
it's
all
you
know
pretty
reasonable,
not
like
posts
strategy
as
a
whole.
Then
it
has
got
through
database
for
me
because
it's
adding
a
column.
A
A
Weekly
for
the
Milestone,
we
actually
did
the
release
posts
last
week
because
of
the
earlier
cut
off
for
merge
requests
due
to
the
16.0
release
so
jump
through.
Is
there
any
O'hare
updates
from
anyone
and
then
just
one
last
point?
A
For
me,
sir
asthma
has
run
a
script
through
all
of
the
ordered
events
in
the
system
and
come
up
with
a
list
of
dynamic
event,
names
that
are
left
to
and
yaml
files,
for
there
was
a
little
there
was
about
20,
odd
string
related
by
Static
ones
as
well,
but
we've
added
the
merge
request
for
that.
So
what
I've
done
is
I've
split
up
that
list
and
tagged
all
the
back-end
engineers
in
that
list
to
share
the
workload.