►
From YouTube: Compliance weekly - 2023-05-09
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
B
C
B
C
B
Next,
one
is:
don't
create
group,
seven
membership,
audit.
C
E
Yes,
this
is
for
exporting
the
Frameworks
on
this.
This
was
the
back
end.
Part
of
the
change.
The
front
end
part
is
shipped
but
not
enabled
yet
there's
one
Mr
left
that'll
tie
those
two
together.
C
This
was
actually
a
bug
which
is,
in
the
group.
Protective
branches
feature
flag
rollout.
This
was
fixed
by
front
end
by
J.
So
thanks
for
fixing
this
day,
I
have
another
update
on
this.
One
I
started
rolling
out
the
feature
flag
today,
since
this
was
the
last
one
of
the
bugs
which
were
blocked
on
rolling
the
feature
plug,
but
while
rolling
the
feature
flag,
I
encountered
a
couple
of
other
issues.
I
have
recorded
a
video
of
that
and
added
it
to
the
feature
flag
issue.
C
The
current
state
is
that
this
particular
feature
flag
is
enabled
in
all
the
non-production
environments.
Right
now,
it's
still
not
enabled
on
production.
If
anyone
wants
to
enable
it
for
production
environments,
it
supports
the
group
actors,
so
we
can
enable
it
for
a
particular
group.
If
you
want
to
test
on
production,
the
comments
I
have
added
on
the
feature
flag,
rollout
issue,
which
is
still
in
workflow,
ready
for
development.
B
Okay,
next,
we
have
is
Spike,
determine
the
unit
test
coverage
for
compliance
features
to
this.
B
C
A
Yes,
the
front
end
had
a
little
bit
more
interesting,
but
we're
not
100
sure
about
that.
So
I've
created
a
follow-up
issue
to
have
a
look
in
that
and
Future.
B
Yeah,
so
let's
wait
for
today
or
if
there
are
any
offers
that
we
need
to
push.
We
can
call.
D
I,
don't
have
any
open
review
requests
so
if
anyone
needs
some
I
have
availability.
Okay,.
B
E
I
haven't
started
looking
deep
into
it
yet,
but
that
did
State
me
as
kind
of
odd.
There
might
be
some
reasonability
of
finders
for
me,
but
I,
don't
see
us
using
graphql
apis
called
up
from
the
back
end
feel
free
to
correct
me
if
there
there's
a
pattern
of
that,
but
it
seems
odd
to
me.
F
I,
don't
think
so,
I
think
the
first
one
I
will
like
got
the
filter.
One
I
will
do
it
this
week
and
the
ux
Sim
one
I'm,
still
working
on
the
solution:
validation,
prepare
for
the
Prototype
and
the
roadmap.
One
I
think
I
need
to
put
it
on
post
because
we
are
waiting
for
the
research
from
Michael,
but
he
won't
be
able
to
do
it.
This
Milestone
so
I
need
to
sync
with
him
to
see
when
we
can
pick
it
up
again.
So
that's
the
update.
A
The
sorry
thing
was
there
any
other
release
posts
that
we
need
to
get
written
up
before
that
elegant.
B
It
be
completed
if
that,
if
those
Mrs,
for
instance,
level
audit
event
destinations
get
merged
before
in
this
release,
then
we
might
have
to
send
that.
C
A
Yes,
yeah
and
I
think
also
earlier
has
done
some
of
the
quick
edits
and
create
hidden
framework
stuff
on
that
report
as
well.
That's
Milestone,
so
that
would
be
good
to
release
as
well.
A
D
Way,
I
don't
know
if
you've
looked
at
the
merge
request,
but
the
database
reviewer
wants
me
to
revisit
the.
D
Original
implementation,
using
the
in
operator
thing
so
just
started,
re-bricking
that
French
Quest
now
so
still
going
back
and
forth,
then
virtuous.
A
All
right
so
next
on
the
agenda,
I've
got
the
next
two
items
so
in
the
engineering
all
hands
you
might
have
seen,
there
was
a
discussion
around
Development
Fund
budget
for
Q2
I've
created
an
issue
and
linked
it
in
the
stock
as
well.
A
So
please
put
your
thoughts
on
what
we
could
introduce
this
budget
for
to
catch
up
and
do
some
fun
stuff
and
the
second
one
was
I
mentioned
the
okay,
as
for
Q2
were
added
in
last
week,
one
of
them
was
around
increasing
the
AI
knowledge
within
the
team.
So
I've
opened
up
an
issue
around
some
of
the
training
and
ideas
that
we
have
which
I've
linked
there
as
well.
So
please
add
your
thoughts,
ideas.
C
A
Cool
anything
else
from
anyone
to
discuss.