►
From YouTube: 2023-08-09 Code Review Weekly
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Start
it
all
right
all
right.
Welcome
to
the
code
review
weekly
for
August,
the
9th
and
it's
good
to
see
everyone.
I
know
it's
been
a
been
a
hot
minute
since
we've
had
this
meeting,
you
know
excited
to
see
everyone
I
they're,
the
first
one,
it's
just
a
read-only
I'll
be
back
out
a
couple
days,
coverages
I
think
in
place,
but
it
usually
goes
by
for
just
a
couple
days.
A
I
think
the
big
one
that
I
wanted
to
ask
about
was
the
Google
models.
I
know
we
like
I'm
Matt
I.
Thank
you
for
documenting
I
I.
Think
we
have
everything
like
at
least
capable
of
using
the
Google
models.
I'm,
not
sure
if
they're
all
turned
on
to
that.
But
I
was
wondering.
A
What
the
status
is
right.
B
I
think
I
think
we
only
have
one
that's
not
on
Google
right
now
and
we
have
a
feature
flag
for
it,
but
it's
not
rolled
out.
So
that's
for
summarize
my
review
that
one
and
I'll
place
it
links
I.
Think
that's
the
only
one
that's
I
should
check,
but
as
far
as
I
know,
the
rest
of
them
have
are
either
already
on.
We've
switched
it
over
to
the
Google
model,
or
they
never
had
it
to
begin
with.
B
So
it
might
not
be
a
bad
idea
to
have
maybe
an
issue
that
just
lists
them
out
somewhere
that
we
can
point
to
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
scrutiny
or
Isa,
and
when
are
we
going
to
get
off
of
all
of
this
I
don't
know
so
my
it
probably
wouldn't
hurt
to
to
be
able
to
track
that
somewhere.
B
B
A
People
are
just
asking
this:
this
flag
does
not
exist
on
production.
A
B
Yeah,
it's
possible
that
we
I'll
I'll,
dig
in
and
try
to
save
it
possible.
We
haven't
even
gotten
to
that
point
yet
to
create
it
to
enable
it
to
anything
which.
A
Yeah
I
think
that
would
be
good.
Okay,
yeah
I
think
that's
the
only
the
only
thing
that
I
needed
covered
was
those.
Those
are
that's
the
big
one
that
I'm
getting
that
we've
been
asked
about
is
the
is
the
status
of
models
on
the
AI
stuff
and
then
I
think
the
rest
of
the
a
stuff
we'll
cover
in
planning
in
terms
of
what
we
need
to
do
to
change
labels
from
experiment
to
Beta
or
to
GA.
However,
we
see
fit
I,
think
I.
A
Think
most
of
them
are
probably
fairly
quick
to
get
to
Beta
they're
they're
there,
it's
just
a
matter
of
yeah
what
what
requirements?
Change
cool
right.
B
It
feels
like
the
code
or
the
features
themselves
are
ready
for
beta.
It's
just
what
what
do
we
need
around
that
around
documentation
and
ux
and
marketing?
Whatever
else
we
need
is
that
seem
like
seem
accurate,
that
that
moving
to
Beta
doesn't
seem
like
it's
going
to
require
a
ton
of
coding
work.
A
Yeah
I
think
what
it's
going
to
require
is
Alex
to
do
something,
and
then
the
coding
work
will
be
where
we
say
experiment
and
have
a
badger
in
parentheses
like
that'll,
all
have
to
get
updated
to
say
beta
right,
like
I,
think
we'll
have
to
do
some
like
cosmetic
things,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
any
like
serious
doubts
about
The
Experience
around
most
of
the
at
least
the
summary
style
features
right
now:
okay,.