►
From YouTube: Quality Engineering Productivity Weekly 2020-05-12
Description
Weekly Engineering Productivity meeting from 2020-05-2012
A
B
C
Sounds
great
yeah
I
was
I
was
trying
to
get
food
ready
for
for
Mike.
My
kids
did
you
already
get
started
at
all?
Well,
no,
all
right!
Let's
start
with
everyone's
favorite
snack
food
I!
Don't
just
keep
it
simple.
Today,
mine
is
chips
and
salsa,
I
think
I've
eaten
chips
and
salsa
as
long
as
I
can
remember,
and
very
particular
in
my
sauce,
that
has
to
be
like
a
restaurant
style
and
here
in
the
US.
That's
like
very
smooth,
so
everything's
like
blended
up
no
chunks.
C
D
Yeah
I
think
for
me
chips.
Also.
D
We
really
love
that
and
with
my
girlfriend
I
think
every
week
we
we
have
what
we
call
an
Appy
ho,
which
is
like
you
know
before
the
before
the
meal,
so
like
appetizers
I
would
say
and
by
the
way
I
think
in
France.
We
learn
that
chips
is
crisps
and
I.
Think
in
the
in
the
UK.
Actually
that
I
call
creeps,
Chris
I
mean
yeah
anyway,
I
think
it's
always
confusing
for
us,
because
friends,
we
say
chips
as
well.
So
that's
but
I'm
relieved
that
in
the
u.s.
D
B
Mines,
it's
not
something
I've
always
eaten
I,
actually
discovered
it,
maybe
about
four
or
five
years
ago.
It's
these.
Like
polish
wafers.
There
are
just
really
kind
of
small
light
wavers,
so
they're,
not
too
sweet,
but
there
they
would
be
considered
a
sweet
snack
rather
than
a
savory,
snack
yeah.
So
in
the
UK
we
call
chips,
crisps
and
we
call
like
fries
chips.
So.
B
Yes,
so
but
Australians
call
chips,
so
crisps,
chips
and
then,
like
potato
fries,
hot
chips,
you
have
chips
and
hot
chips,
but
yeah.
Yes,
crisps,
crisps
are
more
like
potato
based,
but
then
you
have
like
corn
based
snacks,
like
tortilla
chips.
You
know
which
you
dip
in
souther
and
stuff.
So
we
have
I,
think
Doritos
they're,
pretty
good,
like
cheesy
cheesy
kind
of
flavored.
C
Yeah
yeah,
like
a
tomato-based
salsa
to
me
that
usually
tomatoes,
red
onion,
think
like
a
pico
de
gallo,
oh
yeah,
so
like
that
and
just
all
those
ingredients,
just
I
like
pico
on
its
own,
but
I
like
everything,
just
smooth
so
puree,
all
that
and
it's
spicy
or
not
spicy
I,
like
spicy.
Actually
the
salsa
there's
like
piece
is
like
a
brand
in
the
u.s..
C
It's
like
pretty
prevalent
in
all
the
grocery
stores,
I
like
their
hot
salsa,
and
it
had
been
out
since,
like
coronavirus
started
and
all
the
gross
I
like
I,
think
I
went
to
like
three
different
grocery
stores
and
over
the
last
month
and
a
half
and
it's
been
out
everywhere.
My
in-laws
found
three
jars
of
it
and
brought
them
this
weekend
to
me.
So
I
finally
have
my
favorite
salsa
back.
It's
been
awesome
care
package.
B
Yeah
yeah
I
find
that
there's
been
snacks
are
kind
of
one
of
those
things
that
you
go
to
in
time.
Well
and
I
found
like
here
I've
been
stocking
up
on
those
snacks
that
I
like
during
this
period,
because
we're
not
going
shopping
as
much,
but
it's
also
something
that
I'd
like
to
have,
and
it's
kind
of
like
a
comfort
thing
for
me.
I
guess
so
I've
been
trying
to
get
more
C's
more
of
these
wafers
recently,
probably
more
so
than
before.
This
the
virus
started.
E
E
E
A
B
E
A
F
F
F
It's
a
big
fan
of
Korean
snacks,
so
this
is,
this
is
very
famous
in
South.
Korea
is
called
choco
pie
and
it's
it's
kind
of
like
money
in
the
in
the
military
camps
in
South
Korea.
It's
very
valuable
for
some
reason
like
you
can
get
like
ask
for
favors,
and
you
pay
your
fellow
comrades
with
with
this
and
they're
they're,
really
happy
and
yeah.
We've
got
a
bunch
of
other
things
that
I
did
not
buy
this
so
for
transparency
and
this
Remy.
F
D
D
C
That's
a
whole
thanks
for
joining,
hopefully
everything's
going.
Okay,
I
know
it's
very
early
on
the.
F
C
D
C
Well,
we'll
move
into
the
announcements:
I
want
to
call
attention
and
my
son
is
running
around
so
I
apologize
for
the
noise,
but
the
next
round
of
360
feedback,
but
first
for
some
of
us
is
starting
May
18th,
there's
a
nice
page
in
the
handbook
with
a
lot
of
details,
including
the
timeline
and
a
video
by
Rose
that
kind
of
describes
the
process.
I
would
encourage
everyone,
watches
there's
an
AMA
tomorrow
as
well
I
linked
to
the
docs,
so
that
you
have
a
question,
feel
free
to
add
it.
C
Awesome
next
announcement
is
a
group.
Conversation
is
Wednesday,
I
linked
the
slides
here.
Please
review
them,
make
any
changes
that
you
bike.
If
you
have
questions
you
can
you
can
just
we
can
discuss
them
in
the
slack
thread,
but
I
appreciate
everyone's
collaboration
on
these
and
to
make
them
make
them
as
good
as
they
can
be.
F
Since
I'm
here
can
I,
just
let
you
a
team
know
so
I
added
one
more
page
for
for
each
team.
Actually,
that
captures
just
a
team.
Okay
are
so
that
that's
slide
13.
So
we
have
the
Oakley
arts
at
the
top
at
the
department
level
and
we
track
and
that
each
team
is
have
the
other
on
one
page,
landing
page
for
the
for
the
okay
ours,
so
that
that
should
be
clear.
Now
know
where
things
land.
F
And
there
were
some
discussions
on
on
slack
earlier
on
I'm
duplicating
chaos.
It's
essentially
a
pass
through
we
are,
but
we
can
assign
one
issue
to
multiple
epochs.
So
it's
there's
this
excerpt
paperwork
that
that
I
have
to
deal
with,
because
we
want
to
track
it
from
what
the
chief
of
staff
it's
asking
us
to
do
this
time,
so
yeah
I
I,
am
planning
to
give
some
feedback
to
the
p.m.
because
this
is
a
this
is
gonna,
be
our
process
going
forward.
F
One
thing
we
could
do
is
just
just
resolve
or
mock
mic
ers
duplicate,
but
I
I
was
hoping
that
it
doesn't
close
the
issue.
Obviously
it
closes
the
issue
so
that
might
cause
confusion
as
well.
So
right
now,
I
just
have
to
see
it
open
and
just
link
liberally
down
down
down
down
down
to
the
team
care.
Yeah.
C
And
and
Remy
Albert
you,
you
both
have
provided
good
feedback
throughout
this
whole
process.
I
I
know
that
there's
room
for
improvement
to
make
it
clearer
the
thread
and
slack
Remy
I
know
you
just
added
a
bunch
haven't
been
able
to
read
it
yet,
but
let's
keep
the
ideas
coming
on
how
we
can
improve
this
and
make
it
clearer,
because
there's
definitely
room
for
improvement.
C
D
Yeah
one
one
small
thing:
I
was
thinking
like
without
changing
the
whole
thing,
but
just
like
I
saw
that
the
CEO
chaos,
our
name
like
actually
see
o
KO
in
the
title
and
that's
clearer,
and
that
makes
that
clear.
That
is
a
clear
for
the
CEO,
specifically
and
I.
Think
in
our
case,
maybe
we
should
like
add
quality
director
care
care,
because
I
think
that
what
confused
me
is
that
I
didn't
know.
D
F
That's
a
great
suggestion,
like
every
everybody
across
the
company
has
like
K
R,
K
R,
so
it's
kind
of
confusing
right
now,
yeah,
that's
that's
something
we
could
do
and
just
check
it
that
we're
Thanks
and
to
echo
what
caused
that
it's
still
very
much
an
experiment.
I
personally,
like
the
older
from
older
format,
however,
we
were
trying
out
what
the
what
they
the
overall
process
would
be
going
forward
and
then
Sid
wants
us
to
use
epics
I.
Think
that's
also
the
key
and
like
linking.
F
D
The
only
thing
that
I
find
strange
out
is
duplicated
chaos,
like
that
true
tales
and
I
still
don't
understand
why
you
cannot
just
be
assigned
to
the
bottom
letter,
K
I
would
say
and
an
iPhone
that
in
out
n
book
page
we
actually
we
actually
say
that
we
shouldn't
duplicate
issues
and
just
use
the
top
like
the
bottom
one
issue:
oh
yeah,
I
yeah,
that's
still
not
clear
for
me,
but
I
mean
personally
I
don't
have
to
care,
because
I
just
should
just
look
at
the
team.
Okay
else,
yeah.
C
So
I
would
say
we
also
care
about
the
efficiency
Department
kr,
because
our
team
is
responsible
for
providing
those
results.
So
I
do
want
to
try
to
be
clear.
There
I
know
it's
a
director
level
and
that's
where
I
think
a
lot
of
this
confusion
started
is
but
I'll
say.
That's
where
it's
confusing
for
me,
I
should
be
clear
in
my
language
here
that
there's
a
department
level
K
are
the
our
team
is
responsible
for
that's
not
at
our
team
of
all
were
partially
in
our
team
level
through
duplication,
so.
C
We'll
we'll
look
at
how
we
can
clarify
that
I
think
I
as
well.
Like
I
said
you
have
some
good
suggestions,
I've
seen
the
slack
thread
and
haven't
necessarily
read
through
those
I
like
the
pass
through
Kay.
Ours
are
like
one
thing
on
that
that
maybe
met
can
provide
some
more
detail
into
it.
That's
that's
something
that
we're
trying
out
in
the
engineering
organization
from
Eric.
So
that's
an
ass
from
Eric
that
we're
trying
out
throughout
the
whole
organization.
C
C
My
goals
with
all
this
is
to
try
to
be
clear
in
communication.
You
know
like
have
a
drive
accountability
with
the
milestone
and
create
that
sense
of
urgency
and
increase
the
opportunity
for
everyone
to
have
knowledge,
transfer
and
learn
new
things.
I'm,
not
trying
to
add
more
stress
through
these.
So
if
due
dates
are
settings
like
creating
this
strong
sense
of
urgency,
that's
adding
stress,
please,
let
me
know,
or
any
of
these
actions
are
confusing
or
adding
stress.
Please,
please
pass
that
feedback
along
any
questions
on
that
item.
C
I
can
add
them
the
security,
so
I'll
say
that
the
two
issues
where
there
are
some
examples.
Here's
the
security
MRI
said
a
do
data
on
to
say:
let's
follow
up
on
this
plan
by
this
date
or,
let's
see
if
we
can
have
a
better
understanding
of
the
the
scope
by
this
date
and
setting
a
milestone
just
to
kind
of
set.
A
target.
Chinchin
was
great
to
provide
feedback
that
where
he
said
this
isn't
necessarily
achievable
so
on
setting
that
that
was
I.
C
D
C
The
next
item-
I'll
just
kind
of
get
this
started.
I-
was
curious,
with
the
team's
thoughts
were
on
trying
out
merge
strain
for,
like
short,
durations,
very
similar
to
what
was
done
on
the
handbook
repo.
So
we
can
have
a
coordinated,
maybe
an
hour
two
hours
and
then
look
at
ramping
up
to
see
what
the
impacts
are.
D
So
yeah
she
knew
I,
replied
and
yeah.
Basically,
we
have
the
problem
of
folks
that
don't
run
with
like
that
runs
in
the
in
their
own
namespace
I
would
say,
like
trough,
talk
pipelines,
so
so,
basically
for
community
contributions
that
wouldn't
work,
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
Isabel's
mesh,
like
I,
think
we
can
still
merge,
but
that
bypass
and
make
the
train
derailed.
If
I
can
say
that,
and
so
that
would
like
remove
all
the
current
node
requests
from
the
Train.
E
A
So
it
makes
sense
if
we
always
create
a
branch
in
the
canonical
which
has
for
any
community
contribution
and
merge
from
there,
because
it's
it's
it's
an
extra
work,
but
probably
not
too
many
extra
or
because
we
just
need
to
do
it
when
it's
ready
to
be
merged
and
that
avoids
all
kinds
of
fork.
Issues.
C
C
The
thing
I
guess
the
context
I
didn't
provide
as
I
was
hunting
for
the
issues.
The
things
that
I'd
be
looking
to
understand
better
by
experimenting
is
like
any
like
how
how
often
does
the
merge
trinket
reset
from
like
flaky
pipelines,
so
how
reliable
is
it
what's
the
performance
of
our
master
pipelines?
How
would
how
would
that
change
from
the
car
state
and
then
Remmy?
One
of
the
things
you
brought
up
yesterday
when
we
chat
about
this
was
what
does
the
pipeline
graph
look
like
for
the
subsequent
Mrs
that
are
in
the
pipeline?
C
So
if
you
have
a
docks
pipeline,
that's
first
in
line
and
a
pipeline
get
started
for
the
second
one.
That's
like
a
code
change.
Does
that
also
include
the
docks
jobs
and
the
code
change?
Does
it
just
do
the
code
changes?
Those
are
that
there's
there's
some
questions
on.
How
do
all
the
rules
like
configuration
rules
in
our
pipeline
kind
of
overlay
with
merge
trains
where
there
could
be
really
valuable
feedback
for
the
verify
team,
just
even
through
the
experimentation
by
the
loan?
It's
master
stability.
C
So
it
doesn't
sound
like
there's
any
reason
other
than
the
fork
pipelines
which
looks
like
it's
scheduled
and
lurching
one.
So
we
can
work
around
that
by
encouraging
maintain
errors
to
not
merge
prime
ours
from
forts
during
that
time,
but
it
doesn't
sound
like
there's
a
reason
not
to
try
or
not
to
consider
trying.
C
Okay,
alright,
so
I
will
go
back,
I,
see
I'm,
you
real
quickly,
I'll
go
through
and
do
a
plan
to,
or
just
like
a
proposal
on
that
issue
and
get
some
more
feedback
from
the
team
async
before
we
look
to
do
it,
it's
not
anything
that
we'd
look
to
do
like
in
this
release,
maybe
in
the
middle
to
the
end
of
thirteen
one.
So
it's
not
something
that
I
want
to
set
high
urgency
on
just
wanted
to
discuss,
go
ahead.
Mac
is.
F
It
is
it
because,
so
if
we
can't
use
motions
all
in
one,
I
assume
the
merge
results
pipeline
and
merge
trains
can't
coexist
in
the
same
implementation.
Can
it
meaning
the
ones
from
the
one
from
our
team
members
go
through
the
merge
train
but
then
anything
from
Forks?
Can
we
use
convinced
to
use
just
merge,
super
spy
apply
and
they
they
just
go
in
another
pathway,
not
not
cool,
and
we
had
a
train.
D
D
Our
just
thing
with
the
issue
that
that,
or
it's
mentioned,
that
that's
scheduled
for
thirteen
one
I,
think
that
should
solve
the
problem,
because
that
would
allow
us
maintenance
and
developers
in
general
of
the
canonical
project
to
start
a
pipeline
into
Connecticut
projects
after
reviewing
the
code.
So
after
checking
that
the
code
is
fine
and
not
exposing
variables,
so
I
think
that
would
solve
the
program
and
I.
E
D
F
E
So
I've
been
looking
into
the
front
end
fixtures
job
recently.
One
thing
I
found
is
that
this
pictures
are
mostly
JSON
and
HTML
fixtures.
They're
static
did
so
they
are
taking
a
long
time
because
it's
running
yes,
our
state
test,
which
creates
the
data
within
two
hours
by
yourself,
like
that
using
factories
and
stuff,
and
so
whatever
also
using
the
background
jobs,
which
then
get
repeatedly
called
in
accumulates
time.
E
So
I
feel
like
it's.
In
most
cases,
it
doesn't
need
to
be
run
repeatedly.
So
I
was
thinking
whether
we
can
use
therapies,
fixtures
or
something
different
or
any
other
solution
that
we
can
to
recreate
this
to
get
to
the
same.
In
result
of
having
the
data
ready
for
a
controller
to
render
JSON
curious
and
water
I
guess
everyone
else.
D
Yeah
I
don't
have
a
good
idea
right
now,
but
yeah.
The
only
thing
is
that
I
always
thought
that
yeah
like
using
a
spec
to
generate
fixtures
is
on
one
hand
it's
knit
and
on
the
other
and
it's
a
hack
so
and
for
very
complex
features
like
the
psycho
analytics.
It
really
requires
a
deep
knowledge
of
how
all
this
data
is
like
what
the
structure
of
this
data
needs
to
be
before
you
can
improve
things.
Yeah,
yeah
I,
don't
have
a
good
solution.
E
D
D
I
think
that
that
was
the
plan
and
there
were
a
few
issues
to
get
to
that
point,
because
the
pictures
need
to
like,
like
the
kilchers,
need
to
be
like
it
impotent
when
you
reach
animate
them
like
the
dates,
shouldn't
change
and
stuff
like
that,
but
yeah
I
think
that
was
thanks
for
reminding
us,
because
I
think
that
was
the
plan.
So
we
should
probably
focus
on
that
and
see
what
is
missing
because.
A
A
C
Other
thing
I
was
gonna,
throw
out
is,
if
you
need
like,
since
these
are
cycling
analytics.
If
we
just
need
help
from
that
team,
we
could
we
can
ask
them,
it
might
be
low
priority,
but
it
doesn't
hurt
to
ask
and
say
hey:
do
you
have
any
ideas,
whether
it's
I'm
not
sure
who
the
front
end
people
aligned
with
with
that
group
part,
but
we
can
ask
there
yeah
I.
C
C
A
So
last
time,
I
move
all
the
group
definitions
from
the
policy
files
to
Ruby
file
and
I
try
to
move
them
into
llamo,
because
we
realize
that
there's
a
lot
of
mismatching
with
the
current
stage
definitions,
so
I
literally
I
want
to
somehow
use
a
script
to
generate
the
fire
and
we
can
adding
any
more
assignments
to
to
generate
fires
if
needed.
So
we
don't
have
to
memory,
go
through
it
all
the
time
and
and
in
order
to
do
this,
this
is
the
first
step
to
make
it
more
like
a
stage
demo
file.
A
C
Yeah
great
great
refactoring
here
I
think
this
will
help
with
the
specific
requests
on
this
Idol
Mr
triage
report.
I
would
lean
towards
having
I'll
say
like
a
script
or
some
sort
of
patching
system,
I
think
just
using
the
stages
or
using
the
stages
diamo
as
a
single
source
of
truth
might
be
a
little
disruptive.
Even
though
they're
weekly
reports
is
but
something
that
we
can
work
through
on
the
issue.