►
From YouTube: Manage::Import UX Office Hours 2020-12-15
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
So
with
that,
then
being
said
I'll
go
ahead
and
share
my
screen,
and
and
we
can
so
what
I
was
thinking
ilya
is-
and
let
me
know
if
you
have
something
else
you'd
like
to
discuss
or
have
something
else
in
mind,
but
we
can
walk
through
the
solution.
Validation,
findings
for
the
group,
migration,
nbc
and
harris,
and
I
can
kind
of
talk
about.
What's
like
the
results
and
the
outcomes
and
kind
of
what's
in
store
for
the
near
future,.
B
Yeah
for
sure
I
will
be
happy
to
hear,
because
we
finally
got
to
merge
to
master.
It
means
that
approximately
tomorrow
it
will
hit
staging
and
then
I
will
be
able
to
enable
feature
flag.
So,
finally,
both
of
you
will
be
able
to
take
a
closer
look
at
at
least
how
and
how
it
the
accent
feels
on
the
staging
before
it
will
get
to
the
production.
A
Okay,
so
what
I
did
within
the
research
issue,
if
you
want
to
actually
look
at
the
recordings
and
see
a
little
bit
more
of
the
interviews
and
details
as
well
as
the
transcripts
you
can
sign
up
for
that
dovetail
link
and
that's
where
we
house
a
lot
of
our
research
so
in
the
future,
you
might
need
access
to
that,
possibly
so,
for
so.
This
is
the
better
ux
for
group
creation,
solution,
validation.
A
So
what
we
interviewed
five
participants,
they
were
all
internal
and
I
shared
with
them
a
prototype
and
basically
it's
the
prototype.
A
Of
the
group
migration
experience
from
end
to
end,
and
then
we
asked
several
questions
related
to
the
group,
migration
experience
and
here's
some
of
the
insights
so
in
respect
to
finding
the
new
group
creation.
So
we
asked
like
how
would
you
go
about
that
navigating
to
the
import
page,
a
lot
of
folks
went
to
the
groups
and
projects
dropped
down
within
the
main
navigation
top
bar
navigation.
A
So
that
was
pretty
interesting
and
let's
see
they
expect
everything
to
be
imported.
We
have
some
discrepancy
on
how
the
plus
drop
down
is
used.
Like
one
really
interesting
one
was
one
user
said
it
looked
like
an
option
to
customize
the
top
board
or
top
bar.
Rather
another
thought
it
was
an
overflow
of
the
top
navigation.
A
So
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
can
be
done
around
that
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
necessarily
import
per
se
or
I
think
we're
trying
to
figure
out
which
group
owns
that
type
of
navigation
and
some
suggestions
are
to
guide
the
user
as
to
you
know
how
to
import
your
group.
So,
if
they're
importing
for
the
first
time,
maybe
give
them
some
sort
of
language
around,
this
is
step
one.
This
is
step
two.
A
This
is
what
to
expect,
etc
and
let's
see
again
we're
missing
information
on
why
we
should
connect
to
another
instance
and
then
the
simple
one
of
changing
text
from
to
groups
to
insinuate.
A
There
are
multiple
imports
that
can
be
done
so
here
I've
listed
out
some
of
the
action
items,
so
here
we're
talking
about
the
navigation,
which
is
kind
of
a
hot
topic
right
now,
given
that
I
have
found
out
that
there
are
a
couple
of
folks
working
on
this
area
of
navigation,
so
I
think
we
need
to
coordinate
and
consolidate
and
figure
out
who
owns
what
and
how
that's
going
to
look.
So
this
will
be
definitely
more
of
a.
A
I
don't
want
to
say
work
and
project,
but
a
larger
effort,
I
would
say,
or
it's
turning
in
to
be
maybe
more
of
a
larger
effort,
again
guide
users
to
the
first
step
in
moving
over
a
group
and
then
update
the
text.
A
Next,
we
went
on
to
the
group
import
page,
so
this
is
where
we
give
them
two
options:
one
to
connect
to
an
instance,
the
other,
to
upload
a
file.
So
everyone
generally
understood
the
difference
between
the
two.
A
There
were
some
you
know
manual
versus
automatic,
but
there
was
definitely
the
distinction
between
the
two.
A
lot
of
users
said
that
they
would
choose
the
connect,
to
instance,
so
adding
your
url
and
just
because
it
was
a
simpler
process.
It
looked
like
it'd,
be
faster,
essentially,
and
let's
see
oh,
the
beta
badge.
So
when
we
observed
folks
interacting
with
the
beta,
if
they
would
even
mention
it
like
everyone
skipped
over
the
beta,
so
we
have
since
updated.
A
C
It's
closed.
If
you
scroll
down
to
the
bottom
of
it,
there
may
be
a
link
to
which
one's
closed
against
warning
message
down:
yeah.
A
Yeah,
so
we're
changing
that
to
be
a
little
bit
more
impactful
and
then
again,
which
one
would
they
likely
use
import
groups
from
another
instance,
because
it
looks
easier,
any
suggestions
would
be.
A
Oh,
this
is
a
big
one,
showing
groups
that
have
previously
been
imported,
so
they
wouldn't
like
duplicate
the
effort,
so
that's
important
to
not
only
the
admin
but
also
different
members.
I
think
of
the
group
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
in
saying
any
of
this,
but
let's
see
mostly
suggestion
center
and
lack
of
clarity.
You
know
just
really
communicating
to
the
user
what
can
be
brought
over
and
from
where.
A
A
Oh
this
is
interesting
too,
which
I,
I
can't
believe
I
didn't
catch,
but
one
user
expressed
that
they'd
like
the
ability
to
create
a
new
parent
group
within
the
drop
down.
So
if
you
imagine
the
import
page,
you
have
that
drop
down
that
you're
able
to
select
which
group
they
are
saying
that
they
would
like
the
ability
to
create
a
new
parent
group
within
that.
A
So
some
action
items
out
of
there
again
more
clarity,
probably
involving
text
and
then
increase
awareness
around
the
beta
import
limitations.
A
A
Then
we
from
here
we
went
into
importing
group
from
another
instance
of
gitlab.
So
essentially
I
just
asked
them
to
do
so
like
walk
me
through
the
steps
and
take
and
verbalize
what
they
see
on
the
screen,
etc.
So.
A
A
Created
where
is
it
that
we're
adding
showing
one
out
of
20
out
of
163
groups?
What
we're
also
going
to
include
that
I'm
working
on
currently
is
pagination.
So
how
does
how
does
that
work,
and
perhaps
do
we
get
rid
of
showing
one
out
of
20?
That's
still,
you
know
to
be
determined,
I
suppose,
and
then,
when
we
asked
the
user,
what
they
would
be
able
to
sort
search
by
everyone
said
source
name.
C
I
did
just
a
quick
point,
the
second
bullet
point
in
in
what
they
asked
when
asked
what
they
would
right
above
that
yeah
the
scary
point.
I
have
created
an
issue
for
that
and
I'll
we're
gonna
link
that
later,
but
I've
created
an
issue
for.
C
It
was
definitely
up
around
when
you
say
search
it
felt
like
they're
gonna
get
a
different
result
set
than
the
one.
That's
on
the
page,
whereas
you
know
filter
would
be
more
appropriate
because
it's
really
taking
the
issues.
All
the
issues
are
shown
right
now
and
just
showing
a
smaller
subset,
where
search
felt
like
it's
gonna,
just
search
everything
again
and
we're
gonna
get
a
new
result
set
to
begin
with.
C
So
I
created
an
issue
to,
I
think
I've
added
a
note
in
the
issue
that
already
existed
to
replace
the
word
search
with
the
word
filter.
A
I
think
that
sorry,
I'm
just
reading
through
this
quickly
and
calling
out
anything
important,
so
perhaps
group
templates,
is
something
that
we
explore
in
more
of
a
distant
future.
But
that's
something
interesting
that
a
concept
that
was
brought
up
by
during
our
user
interviews.
A
I
think
that
one
user
was
confused
by
why
the
source
group
had
the
external
link
icon
and
the
new
group
that
you
created
that
you've
imported
does
not.
So
that
was
just
a
usability,
import
or
issue,
and
then
everyone
was
saying
or
not
everyone
I
should
say,
but
bulk
import
is
extremely
important,
which
you
know
that's
coming.
B
Made
me
jack
beam
harry
says
multiple
and
bulk
import
is
extremely
low
hanging
fruit.
I
believe
from
all
of
this.
We
have
backend
100
ready
for
bulk
import.
It
is
like,
so
we
need
a
zero
back-end
job.
We
have
front
and
actually
built
in
mind
that
we
will
perform
bulk
import
in
future.
I
mean
right
now.
Actually,
when
you
click
the
import
button,
it
is
requesting
bulk
import
of
one
group,
so
it
was
built
with
this
in
mind.
So.
C
What
do
you
consider
bulk
import
requesting
more
than
one
group
at
a
time?
Right?
Yes,
okay,
yes,
so.
C
B
I
can
do
that,
but
I
suggest
exploring
like-
and
we
previously
discussed
that
a
bit
ago-
and
this
was
also
built
with
this
in
mind-
possibly
having
something
like
a
email-like
checkbox
experience.
So
you
have
the
checkbox
across
allowing
select
multiple
groups.
You
have
one
checkbox
at
the
top
allowing
to
select
the
selector
groups
at
the
import
button,
in
top,
which
will
saying
import,
five
groups,
six
groups
or
whatever,
how
many
you've
selected.
B
But
in
terms
like,
I
said,
if
we
have
a
design
agreed,
this
will
be
a
very
quick
delivery
and,
as
mentioned
a
lot
of
people-
and
I
also
when
I
tried
this
by
myself-
asked
about
bulk
import
and
I
believe
we
can
deliver
a
lot
of
value
with
significantly
low
effort.
Because
we
built
that,
with
this
feature
in
mind,.
C
C
A
So
when
asked,
if
viewing
the
history
of
imports
would
be
useful,
yes,
because
of
duplicating
efforts
that
which
they
could
avoid
also
re-running
an
import
is
desired,
and,
let's
see
so
when
asked,
if
they
expect,
if
they
expected
a
reimport,
will
rewrite
existing
data.
Yes,
they
do
or
that
we
only
ask
one
participant.
B
You
get
to
see
that
I
bet
this
is
about
that.
We
currently
show
only
top
level
groups.
That
means
you
will
not
be
able
to
see
user
instances.
On
the
other
side,
I
mean,
for
example,
if
I'm
I'm
user,
a
on
my
gitlab
instance,
and
I
have
multiple
projects.
I
will
not
be
to
perform
bulking
part
of
that
pro.
I
bet
this
is
about
it
because
it's
mentioning
about
other
users.
A
Yeah
an
audit
page
for
admins-
I
think
we've
been
talking
about
this
for
a
while
and
then
filter
on
imported
groups,
page
to
show
imported
verses,
available,
so
kind
of
exploring
what
that
looks
like
if
that's
a
filter
or
perhaps
that
then
becomes
tabs-
I
don't
know,
still
still
tbd.
So
that's!
Basically,
the
summary
of
you
know
just
some
of
the
insights
that
we
learned
from
our
user
interviews.
B
Yeah,
it
makes
perfect
sense
one
second,
I'm
just
bringing
my
local
gitlab
instance
where
I
have
this
one
enabled,
because
I
want
to
check
that.
I
believe
we
have
an
ability
to
search
groups
in
drop
down.
This
is
addressing
the
step
three
when
asked,
if
able
to
edit
any
information
on
page,
the
destination
group
should
have
a
way
to
search.
C
Yeah-
and
there
was
there-
was
several
comments
around
that
one
was
the
ability
to
search
or
narrow
down
those
choices,
because
if
you
have
a
large
structure
that
you're
importing
from
that
could
be
really
big.
Another
question
was:
is
this
a
flat
list
of
the
tree
that
exists
on
the
other
side,
or
is
this
a
flat
list
of
just
the
top
level
things
on
the
other
side
or.
C
Right,
but
so
so
you
know
where
we're
going
to
go
in
the
future
is
potentially
be
able
to
show
a
tree,
and
you
know
pick
from
a
tree
and
also
where
we're
going
to
so
the
destination
drop
down,
also
the
ability
to
create
a
new
group
there
that
didn't
exist
before,
and
there
was
also
a
question.
What
does
that
look
like
if
there
is
no
top
level
groups
on
the
destination?
So
let's
say
this
nation
has
no
groups
right
now
whatsoever.
B
A
So
here's
would
the
situation
be
that
a
new
user
joins
git
lab
they
have
all
of
their
data
on
github.
They
want
to
import.
You
know
immediately
after
maybe
they've
created
a
project
or
something
like
that.
Are
you
saying
there's
no
group
created,
so
they
can't
actually
import
into
anything.
C
In
gitlab
there
is
a
group
created,
so
that's
not
a
problem
problem
is
a
new
user
joins
git
lab,
oh
sorry,
as
in
human
joins
gitlab,
as
in
signs
up
for
gitlab
service
right,
yeah
yeah,
a
new
user
signs
up
for
a
new
gitlab
service.
They
land
in
a
blank
instance
that
they're
associated
with
and
now
they
want
to
import
and
if
they
don't
have
any
groups
already
created,
there's
no
way
to
create
groups
and
apparently
just
blows
up.
C
If
the
user
has
no
permission
to
create
any
group,
they
should
be
stopped
at
when
they
click
the
new
group
button.
We
have
a
similar
problem
with
the
new
project.
There
was
a
problem
with
new
project
where
users
who
don't
have
enough
license
to
create
new
projects,
they
were
able
to
actually
proceed
and
it
just
blows
up
somewhere.
So
I
think
we
should
follow
the
same
pattern,
which
is
we
do
not
let
you
get
to
the
point
where
this
happens.
So,
however,
we
have.
B
With
you
pretty
important
point,
it
is
also
right
now
it
is
extremely
and
obvious
blow
up
when
you
reach
the
project
limit
during
group
export.
So.
B
C
B
Yeah,
oh
one,
second,
because
I
I
I'm
just
checking
because
I'm
pretty
sure
I've
hit
some
kind
of
weird
limit
which
was
lit
license
bound.
When
I
was
but
never
mind.
I
will.
I
will
check,
because
I
don't
remember
which
limit
I've
hit
during
the
x
part.
B
B
I
just
wanted
also
to
take
a
look
at
the
kanban
board
to
make
sure
what
of
this.
We
have
prioritized
it
for
next
yeah,
so
one
second,
let
me
share
my
screen
just
for
a
second
yeah,
so
yeah
just
check
it.
Here
we
have
an
auto
complete
for
picking
the
group,
the
two
new
group
destinations,
so
no
matter
how
many
groups
you
have,
you
could
quickly
find
a
new
one
and
it
is
working
the
same
way
the
project
autocomplete
does
so.
B
Yeah,
so
could
we
quickly
take
a
look
in
there,
so
thank
you
you
can.
We
can
now
go
back
to
sharing
your
screen,
probably
sure.
B
Yeah,
so
could
we
quickly
take
a
look,
what
we
have
planned
for
amount
amongst
this?
Could
you
please
add
also
the
label
front
end
to
the
filter.
B
Yes,
and
actually,
I
wrote
the
component,
which
makes
this
a
proper
way,
but
it
obviously
takes
forever
to
replace
it.
In
gitlab
I
mean
this
filter
bar,
so
this
is
as
these
ones
and
and
actually
we
have,
I
believe,
do
we
have
a
label
for
the
just
groups
import
harris.
I
don't
remember.
We.
C
C
B
Okay,
no
problem
because,
like
this
free,
this
free
there's.
C
B
I'm
just
trying
to
see
well
warning
message.
I
believe
I
will
put
await
it
today
and
we
will
put
it
back
in
depth.
So
I'm
just
I
want
to
check
what
we
have
in
in
terms
of
priorities.
C
B
C
I
think
we
need
to
put
that
that
blow
up
issue
ahead
of
at
least
one
or
the
other,
maybe
like
in
between
the
two,
the
one
where
you
don't
have
a
top
level
group
and
then
the
thing
blows
up.
So
I
will
put
that
issue
in
between
these
two.
It's.
B
C
I
mean
if
it,
if
even
if
it
wasn't,
I
would
do
it
just
ahead
of
the
other
ahead
of
the
show
the
total
number.
So
if,
if
only
two
get
delivered,
then
it
should
be
these
two
and
this
one
should
be
just
left
for
39.
So
that's
fine,
I'm
not
even
pushing
for.
B
To
understand
do
we
expect
to
enable
the
feature
flag
for
group
input
on
gitlab.com
as
early
as
possible.