►
From YouTube: English Google SEO office-hours from March 19, 2021
Description
This is a recording of the Google SEO office-hours hangout from March 19, 2021. These sessions are open to anything webmaster related like crawling, indexing, mobile sites, internationalization, duplicate content, Sitemaps, Search Console, pagination, duplicate content, multi-lingual/multi-regional sites, etc.
Find out more at https://developers.google.com/search/events/join-office-hours
Feel free to join us - we welcome webmasters of all levels!
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
Do
you
understand
what
I
say?
No,
I
would.
B
B
Yes
has
to
make
it
other
side
outside
to
social
media.
Sometimes
I
send
to
me
magazine
what
should
I
say.
One
part
one
magazine
with
many
by
many
magazine
with
a
few
content.
A
B
I
put
on
my
website-
and
I
say
it's
on
some
website-
click
link
back
to
my
website
to
to
have
more,
I
mean
more
more
backlink
to
my
website.
Yes,
yeah.
A
Okay,
yeah
I
in
general,
if,
if
you're,
publishing
the
content
on
your
website-
and
you
send
information
about
it
to
to
other
people
and
they
think
it's
good
content
and
they
link
to
you
and
that's
fine,
that's
fine!
I
I
think
it's
something
where
you
you
have
to
try
to
find
the
balance
between
sending
everything
to
everyone
and
really
trying
to
focus
on
finding
someone
who
understands
what
you're
writing
about
who
thinks
that
it's,
it's
good
content
that
you're,
creating
and
then
links
to
you.
A
D
A
Guest
posts-
something
like
that
for
for
us.
If,
if
you're
the
one
who
is
publishing
the
content
on
someone
else's
site,
then
we
would
try
to
ignore
those
links
and
try
to
say
well
you're
putting
the
content
there.
It's
not
a
natural
link,
essentially
yeah,
but
rather
you
put
it
there.
So
that
would
be
something
that
you
would
want
to
use
nofollow
for
for
the
links.
A
B
Yeah,
I
have
one
more
question.
I
have
a
user
said
array
content
every
day.
I
have
two
thousand
content,
a
blog
to
my
website.
However,
among
them
there
are
by
800
to
900
duplicate.
Then.
A
B
Thing
the
same
thing,
but
they
get
around
800
to
900
percent.
They
change
some.
Some
like
some,
some,
like
some
barracks
to
make
it
different.
To
yes,
is
that,
okay,
I
should
ask
them
to
arrive
or
rewrite
they
contain
more
or
change
content
on
not
applause,
content
anymore.
Yes,
I
yeah.
I.
A
I
think
it
would
make
sense
if,
if
you
had
more
more
unique
content
and
valuable
content,
so
not
just
like
taking
the
same
thing
and
rewriting
it
and
then
doing
it
again,
but
rather
trying
to
find
something
new
that
that
they
can
add,
and
if
these
are
users
that
are
posting
on
your
website,
it's
from
from
google's
point
of
view.
It's
still
your
website
and
it's
still,
you
are
publishing
all
of
this
content
and
where
the
content
comes
from.
That's
between,
like
that's
your
problem.
A
A
It,
I
think,
is
very
hard
because,
most
of
the
time
they're
they're
doing
this
for
free
for
you
and
if
you
go
and
say
like,
I
have
strong
rules
and
you
you
must
work
on
my
rules,
then
maybe
they
will
just
go
away,
but
if
it's
still
something
where
you
can
say,
this
is
content
that
I
I
feel
is
valuable
and
make
it
visible
to
search
and
other
parts.
B
A
For
that
yeah,
it's
it's
something
where
you
have
to
think
about
it!
From
from
your
side,
if
users
go
to
your
website,
what
you
would
want
to
do
there,
yes,.
B
One
more
watcher
my
my
company
gradually
developed
new
business,
translate
itself.
People
in
our
of
our
company
will
always
separate
website
for
sale
and
for
marketing.
B
B
I
have
many
sales,
many
people
except
I
give
them
a
website
and
they
give
content
of
my
company
to
say
on
their
website.
Yes,
they
they
their
chat,
sales,
skill,
not
content
skills,
so
they
just
know
could
be.
A
C
C
Okay:
okay,
thanks!
Oh
right,
let
me
copy
it
yeah,
okay,.
F
Right,
I'm
muted,
so
this
is
something
that
hits
me
the
other
day.
So
there
was
an
old
function,
I
think
back
in
2015,
which
was
basically
google.com
ncr,
which
allowed
you
to
access
the
american
index
without
from
another
country.
Basically,
so
you
could
get
the
american
results,
and
since
I'm
sitting
at
a
like
a
in
a
global
function,
I'm
working
in
a
global
capacity
from
from
sweden.
F
Is
there
any
way
to
like
force,
chrome
or
a
browser
via
some
url
to
use
the
local
index,
because
I
I
I
can
get
so
I
I
have
put
in
some
custom
search
engine
in
my
chrome
browser
to
use
the
american
index
and
it
seems
to
get
their
american
organic
results.
But
I
would
also
like
to
get
like
the
ad
results
from
other
countries.
A
Yeah,
I
I
don't
know
so
in
the
the
ncr
is
essentially
no
country
redirect,
which
was
in.
I
don't
know
early
days,
maybe
a
couple
of
years
ago,
when
we
had
the
different
country
domains
where
we
would
redirect
automatically
to
a
local
version,
and
that's
that's
what
the
ncr
version
does
there?
We,
we
don't
have
different
indexes
for
search.
So
it's
not
that
there's
different
content
that
is
indexed
depending
on
the
location.
A
A
So
the
the
hl
is
for
the
language
and
gl
is
for
the
geographic
location.
I
think
yeah
and
with
with
those
you
you
kind
of
get
an
approximation
for
for
the
the
specific
country
versions.
A
What
you
don't
see
is
city
level
information,
and
I
think
what
you
also
don't
see
is
kind
of
the
geographically
limited
ads
there.
So
so
things
like
the
local
search
results
where
you
have
the
map
and
and
all
of
that-
that's
that's
not
visible
there
in
in
chrome
there.
There
is
a
way
that
you
can
specify
the
location
that
your
browser
gives.
A
I
don't
know
if
that
would
be
enough
to
do
so
somewhere
in
the
developer
options
you
can
specify,
like
google
chrome
should
use
this
location
if,
if
an
app
asks
for
the
location,
yeah
yeah
someone
just
linked
to
it,
fantastic
that
might
be
an
option.
The
other
option
that
that
I
know
lots
of
people
do
is
just
to
use
local
proxies
and
just
do
it
essentially
that
way,
because
then
you,
you
know
that
you
really
have
kind
of
local
settings
local
ip
address.
A
All
of
that,
I
think
search
isn't
isn't
trying
to
go
out
of
its
way
to
make
this
hard
for
you.
It's
just
lots
of
people
have
really
weird
browser
settings
and
ip
address
combinations,
and
we
try
to
work
hard
to
make
it
as
easy
as
possible
to
to
get
the
results
that
are
nearby
and
then
some
sometimes
that
means
that
if
you
want
to
act
like
you're
somewhere
else,
it's
a
lot
harder.
My
points
yeah
all.
F
Right,
thank
you
thank
you,
but,
but
just
since
you
are
saying
that
you
have
basically
the
same
index
so,
even
though
I
am
in
sweden,
if
I
use
like
google,
fr
and
google.com
and
then
try
to
force
google
to
be
the
american
google,
I
get
slightly
different
search
results
for
the
same
phrase.
Yes,
so
the.
F
A
Yeah,
the
the
rankings
will
be
different
also
with
hflang
with
the
country,
language
location
settings.
We
might
swap
out
the
urls,
so
we
have
one
url
index,
but
we
know
there
are
different
country
versions.
We
might
swap
that
out.
So
that's
also
something
that
you
would
see,
but
the
in
from
an
indexing
point
of
view.
G
John
one
follow-up
was
on
the
same:
okay,
yes,
okay,
so
john
in
google,
dot,
fr
and
google.com
version,
and
if
I
add
that
gl
equals
to
that
particular
country
in
dot
com
version,
why
the
results
are
different,
because
both
of
these
things
are
saying
the
same
thing
like
good.google.com
google.com
for
india
and
I
am
using
gl
equals
to
I
I
am,
and
then
I
am
going
to
google
dot
co
dot
in.
I
am
also
seeing
that
in
organic,
the
ranking
is
different
or
it
should
be
the
same.
A
It
it
can
be
different
for
for
lots
of
different
reasons.
So
that's
that's
something
where
lots
of
things
play
in
to
the
kind
of
localized
rankings,
and
sometimes
that's
that's
as
simple
as
you're
in
different
experiments
and
we're
trying
things
out
with
rankings
and
that's
why
you
can
sometimes
see
different
things,
but
even
when
we
try
to
recognize
like
a
city
level,
information
and
try
to
improve
the
local
search
results.
For
that,
that's
another
really
common
reason
why
you
would
see
that
now:
okay,
okay.
A
Let
me
just
go
back
to
your
question
thanks
thanks
for
posting
that
good,
my
so
so
the
question
is
my
country
created
a
business
strategy.
Each
of
our
sales
people
is
equipped
with
a
separate
website
with
a
sales
kit,
and
the
information
is
essentially
copied
across
the
different
sites.
Would
that
be
in
violation
of
google
spam
policy
so
for
something
like
that,
depending
on
the
number
of
websites
that
you
have?
A
It
might
be
kind
of
tricky
what
I
would
recommend
doing
if,
if
these
websites
are
mostly
used
in
in
a
way
that,
like
the
individual
sales
people
point
at
that
website-
or
they
have
it
on
their
business
card
or
they
have
it
in
their
email
or
something
like
that
is
to
make
it
so
that
you
have
one
version
of
your
website,
which
is
indexed
and
the
other
versions
use
the
rel
canonical
to
point
at
that
index
version.
So
the
individual
versions
can
still
be
accessible.
People
can
still
go
there.
A
You
can
still
track
the
the
activity.
What
is
happening
there,
but
for
search.
We
combine
everything
into
that
one
central
website
and
that
has
the
advantage
of
your
central
website
being
much
stronger
and
also
that
the
individual
versions
are
not
indexed
and
with
that
you
don't
have
any
trouble
with
the
web
spam
side
with
the
policy
each
side.
E
Yeah
john,
my
question
is
regarding
duplicate
content
or
copied
content.
So
we
have
two
sites
and
I
want
to
merge
contents
of
the
two
sites
into
one
and
we
are
marking
one
of
the
site
has
no
index,
but
then
we
are
not
using
301
redirect
as
we
want
the
existing
customers,
which
are
coming
to
the
other
side
to
view
the
same
content,
and
if
I
use
the
same
content
on
my
other
side,
will
that
be?
E
Will
that
be
counted
into
copied
content
or
duplicate
content,
since
both
the
sites
are
indexed
and
is
the
same
content
which
is
just
available
online,
different
location.
A
Yeah
I
I
would
also
see
that
as
something
where
you
would
want
to
use
a
rel
canonical
to
to
pick
one
of
the
urls
to
show
and
to
make
sure
that
things
are
concentrated
on
on
that
one
version.
So,
with
with
two
copies,
I
don't.
I
don't
think
it
would
be
a
problem
but
you're
kind
of
spreading
yourself.
Then
it's
like,
instead
of
making
one
strong
page
for
your
piece
of
content,
you're
saying
like
I,
I
will
spread
it
out
further,
and
that
means
all
of
these
pages.
A
A
E
Cool
john
thanks,
so
I
have
an
another
question,
so
this
question
is
regarding
the
content,
which
is
included
in
the
first
fold,
so
that
is
available
on
desktop,
but
not
on
mobile.
So
once
we
have
mobile
indexing
or
what
would
be
the
effect
so
why
we
don't
have
on
mobile
is
the
reason
because
we
don't
want
our
users
to
be
overwhelmed
with
the
chunk
of
content.
While
they
are
browsing
the
page
since
the
screen
is
screen,
size
is
smaller
and
we
have
very
real,
less
real
estate
to
display
our
products.
A
Yeah,
so
if
it's
not
available
at
all
on
the
mobile
version,
we
will
not
index
it.
So
that's
it's
it's
from
from
our
side.
It's
it's
a
fairly
technical
thing.
Essentially,
if
it's
not
in
the
html
on
the
mobile
version,
we
don't
have
a
chance
to
index
it.
So
that's
something
where
you
have
to
decide
is
the
content
important
for
your
website
and
if
so,
you
should
also
show
it
to
your
mobile
users.
A
E
Okay,
john,
what
if
I
add
the
same
content
in
and
collapsible
table
or
collapsible
tab,
so
that
it's
also
available
and
does
not
hamper
my
user
experience
as
well.
So
will
this
be
treated
in
the
same
way
as
a
non-collapsible
format
on
desktop?
That's.
A
That's
perfectly
fine
yeah,
that's
something
that
that
a
lot
of
sites
do
to
take
a
a
bigger
ui
and
try
to
combine
it
into
a
smaller
version.
I
think
I
I
would
just
be
careful
from
usability
point
of
view
there
to
make
sure
that
it's
actually
usable
because
just
taking
a
big
website
and
combining
it
into
a
small
version,
you
can
do
that,
but
sometimes
it's
it's
not
as
useful
for
users,
and
sometimes
that
leads
you
to
think
about.
Well.
A
H
Hi,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time.
So
I
I
look
after
a
news
website
that
specializes
in
kind
of
gaming
content
and.
H
In
terms
of
organic
search
and
from
stuff
on
guides,
and
things
like
that
and
plenty
from
social
feeds
to
do
with
interviews
and
features
the
one
area
that
we
kind
of
have
a
lot
of
difficulty
from
is
kind
of
reactive
news,
and
because
we
don't
show
up
at
the
moment
in
news
tag
or
top
stories,
we'd
accepted
on
publisher
center,
around
kind
of
december
2019.
But
we've
not
had
any
kind
of
success
since
then,
and
traffic
from
all,
I
can
tell
is
fine.
H
The
website
is
quite
healthy
because
we'll
appear
quite
highly
in
search
results,
but
it's
obviously
the
news
thing
is
where
we're
a
little
unsure
as
to
what
we
could
maybe
be
doing
extra
to
kind
of
ensure
that
we're
maybe
being
making
the
website
set
up
as
best
as
it
can
to
potentially
be
included
in
kind
of
news
tab.
And
so
I
didn't
know
if
you
had
any
advice
on
that.
A
A
A
The
the
one
thing
with
discover
that
that
I'm
kind
of
aware
of
where,
where
the
team
is
looking
into
algorithmically,
determining
which
content
makes
sense,
there
is
the
content
guidelines
that
we
have
there,
which
are
a
bit
kind
of
different
from
just
pure
web
web
search
kind
of
content
guidelines,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
content
that
we're
highlighting
there
is
not
clickbaity
that
it's
really
high
quality
content.
All
of
these
things,
and
sometimes
I've
I've
seen
sites
that
have
like
some
parts
that
kind
of
fall
afoul
with
these
guidelines.
D
A
We're
like
we're
saying
it's
a
bad
website,
but
some
parts
don't
align
with
those
guidelines
and
other
parts
do
align
with
those
guidelines
and
our
systems
might
look
at
that
overall
and
say:
well,
we're
not
sure,
and
then
they
wouldn't
include
it
in
discover,
because
for
us
the
the
bar
to
be
shown
and
discover
is,
is
a
bit
higher
just
because
we're
proactively
showing
that
content
to
users.
A
H
Just
as
a
very
brief
follow-up,
so
the
the
only
thing
that
I
had
noticed-
and
it
was
something
that
I've
checked
with
a
few
other
publishers
as
well,
is
that
around
kind
of
september
time
there's
like
a
two
day,
weird
spike,
where,
if
you
look
at
like
the
whole
16
months
for
the
site,
it's
completely
zero
and
then
there's
sort
of
a
two
day
period
in
the
start
of
september.
Where
suddenly
it
goes
like
that
and
then
drops
off,
and
I've
noticed
this
from
a
few
other
publishers
as
well.
H
So
I
don't
know
if
it
is
simply
something
that's
kind
of.
We
are
doing
everything
that
maybe
we
need
to,
but
it's
just
waiting
for.
I
know
that's,
probably
not
a
simple
but
like
a
switch
to
be
kind
of
turned
on.
So
what
is
it
just
the
case?
Would
you
think
of
just
kind
of
bearing
with
and
and
kind
of
waiting
it
out.
A
So
what
what
I
would
do
is
maybe
post
in
the
news,
publisher
forum
or
in
the
search
central
forum
in
general
just
to
get
some
insights
from
other
people,
especially
with
regards
to
the
kind
of
inclusion
in
the
the
news
mode
question
just
to
make
sure
that
you're
not
missing
anything
that
the
the
new
side
would
be
watching
out
for.
A
With
regards
to
discover,
I
think
it's
really
tricky,
because
you
don't
really
see
what
kind
of
like
how
close
you
are
kind
of
thing
and
with
discover.
I
I
see
a
lot
of
times.
The
traffic
is
very
binary
and
in
that
either
you're
visible
in
discover,
and
then
you
get
a
lot
of
traffic
or
you're
not
visible
and
discovering
you
don't
get
any
traffic,
and
I
assume
that's
what
that
that
spike
was
that
you
saw
there.
That's
like
well,
oh
we.
H
H
A
Yeah,
I
I
don't
know,
I
I'd
really
suggest
getting
some
input
from
other
people.
I
I
think
I
don't
know
mihai
might
have
some
ideas
as
well,
but
uh-oh.
I
I
woke
him
up,
he's
active
in
the
forums.
It's
it's
something
where
sometimes
there
are
small
things
that
you
can
do,
and
sometimes
it's
just
our
algorithms
waiting
to
collect
enough
positive
signals
and
then
suddenly
everything
is
good
and
working
well
cool.
Thank
you
very
much
sure
ritu.
D
Yes,
sir,
I
have
few
questions
really
related
to
my
website.
Actually,
I'm
working
from
last
one
year
and
my
website
alexa
ranking
was
that
time
sixty
three
thousand
and
now
it
is
five
thousand
after
six.
When
I
have
worked
for
it
now,
it
is
five
thousand.
I
put
lot
of
achievement
on
it,
but
my
domain
authority
it
was
not
enhancing
like
it
was
43
that
time
before
last
one
year
and
it
is
only
45
and
we
are
getting
a
very
good
organic
traffic
for
all
this
side,
but
there's
no
effect
on
domain
authority.
A
Oh
domain
authority-
okay-
oh
sorry,
okay
yeah,
I
I
I
don't
know
so.
Essentially
we
we
don't
use
alexa
rank,
that's
that's
kind
of
one
thing,
so
I
think
if
you're
tracking
your
website
there,
I
think
that's
perfectly
fine.
It's
something
that
is
sometimes
useful
to
compare.
We
also
don't
use
domain
authority.
Domain
authority
is
also
a
metric
created
by
a
third
party.
A
I
I
have
no
idea
what
what
they
count
there.
So
I
I
really
can't
speak
for
that,
but
if
you're
seeing
good
traffic
in
search,
then
I
it
sounds
like
you're
doing
things
well.
A
So
if,
if
the
domain
authority
metric
is
really
important
to
you,
then
I
would
try
to.
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
from
moz
or
someone
else
but
check
in
with
them
to
see
what
what
they're
doing
with
that,
but
it
doesn't
have
any
effect
at
all
on
search,
it's
something
that
they're
doing
on
their
side
and
it's
not
meant
to
be
something
from
from
google
side
that
we
would
worry
about.
D
Okay,
okay,
seven
one
question
related
to
toxic
links,
actually
I'm
getting
so
many
toxic
links
for
my
website,
so
I
I
have
recently
uploaded
a
desal,
but
it
is
not
reducing
the
number
of
toxic
rings.
It
is
doing
very
slowly
like
a
little
bit.
It
has
reduced
only
four
links
out
of
126
links.
It
is
reducing
very
slowly,
so
it
is
a
processor
of
the
google
or.
A
Okay,
so
I
I
think,
first
of
all,
for
for
most
websites,
you
don't
need
to
worry
about
toxic
links,
it's
something
that
our
systems,
when
they
run
across
links
that
they
think
are
bad.
We
will
primarily
ignore
them,
so
it's
not
something
that
individual
links
that
you
find,
which
are
not
good,
would
be
counted
against
your
website.
A
So
that's
that's
kind
of
the
first
step.
So
for
the
most
part,
probably
you
don't
even
need
to
to
worry
about
that.
With
regards
to
the
disavow
file,
we
use
that
internally
to
ignore
those
links
after
we've
discovered
those
links
so
that
they
don't
have
any
effect
at
all
on
your
website.
It's
it's
a
kind
of
a,
I
think,
a
guarantee.
If
you're
worried
about
these
links,
you
can
use
the
disavow
tool.
A
However,
they
still
appear
in
search
console.
So
if
you
go
to
the
links
report
in
search
console,
they
will
still
be
there,
so
it
wouldn't
be
that
you
submit
a
bad
link
in
the
disavow
file
and
then
a
couple
of
days
later
it
disappears
in
search
console.
It
would
still
be
there
so
kind
of
that
connection
between
the
disavow
file
and
the
link
report
and
search
console.
A
That's
something
I
I
would
not
worry
about,
but
again
just
about
the
links
in
general,
especially
if
you're
seeing
individual
links
that
pop
up-
and
you
say-
oh
this
looks
like
a
spammer
drop,
the
link
or
whatever
I.
I
would
completely
ignore
those
and
instead
focus
on
your
website
and
just
keep
keep
moving
forward
and
kind
of
ignore
all
of
those
automated
spammy
things
that
are
happening
because
these
these
spammy
links
they
they
happen
to
every
website,
and
google
system
has
seen
them
so
many
times
over
the
years.
D
So
one
more
question
related
to
code
where
battle
issues
like
nowadays,
we
are
looking
for.
We
are
getting
lots
of
core
battle
issues
and
I
have
seen
the
update
also
in
search
engine
land
related
to
it
like
it
affects
on
our
ranking
for
the
website.
If
we
having
so
many
core
vital
issues,
if
we
are
going
to
resolve
them
on
a
time.
A
Yeah,
so
the
the
update
is
is
currently
planned.
I
think
for
may
for
it
to
take
effect
in
in
search
and
that's
something
we
we
call
it
a
ranking
factor.
It
does
have
an
effect
in
in
the
search
results,
but
for
I
I
think,
for
many
websites,
the
the
relevance
of
the
content
is
still
the
primary
topic
for
ranking.
A
So
it's
something
where
I
think
it's
useful
to
make
a
website
faster
and
make
it
better
for
users
that
always
make
sense.
There
will
be
a
small
ranking
bonus
attached
to
that,
but
a
lot
of
times
you,
you
get
a
lot
of
value
out
of
just
making
your
website
much
stronger,
so
improving
the
content
overall,
creating
something
really
fantastic.
That
people
want
to
find
in
search
kind
of
the
the
relevance
aspect
of
your
website.
A
I
think,
is
still
very
important,
so
not
not
to
say
core
web
vitals
doesn't
matter
it.
It
is
a
factor
that
we
take
into
account,
but
there
are
lots
of
factors
that
we
use
for
search.
So
it's
not
something
where
I
would
say
you
should
stop
working
on
your
website
completely
for
the
next
couple
of
months
and
only.
C
A
D
So
is
there
any
points
which
we
need
to
consider
to
resolve
these
type
of
issues
like
I
didn't
research
on
it
and
got?
I
got
some
points
for
it,
but
it
was
not
working
like
these
are
very
common
points.
A
We
use
the
data
that
users
actually
see.
So
that's
something
where
the
the
data
in
search
console.
I
would
use
that
as
a
guide
to
recognize.
Oh,
I
have
a
lot
of
problems.
I
can
work
on
or
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
problems
and
then,
with
the
live
tests
you
can
figure
out.
This
is
how
I
can
improve
for
this
problem,
so
that's
kind
of
the
two
sides
there
and,
depending
on
the
the
type
of
website
you
have
sometimes
things
like
using
different
plugins
or
removing
plugins.
A
They
can
make
a
big
difference,
so
our
documentation
has
all
of
these
technical
details
on
like
here's,
how
to
make
your
html
faster
and
how
to
make
your
javascript
faster,
but
a
lot
of
times,
especially
if
you're
working
on
a
system
like
wordpress
or
a
lot
of
these
other
platforms,
just
disabling
plugins,
that
you
don't
need
or
swapping
out
plugins
against
simpler
ones.
Sometimes
that
makes
a
very
big
difference
with
regards
to
speed.
So
that's
something
you
can
you
can
try
it
out.
A
You
sure,
let
me
run
through
some
of
the
submitted
questions
as
well.
It
looks
like
we
still
can
still
answer.
Live
questions
forever,
I'll
I'll
be
on
here,
a
little
bit
after
the
recording
as
well.
So
it's
like,
if
any
of
you
want
to
stick
around,
ask
more
questions,
then
feel
free
to
do
so
as
well.
Let
me
see
so
I
think
the
top
question.
I
can't
I
can't
really
answer
much.
A
So
the
question
is,
for
the
past
seven
years
domain
that
google's
organic
visibility
has
grown
in
multiple
countries,
and
it
goes
into
like
why.
Why
is
this
site
ranking
so
well,
and
I
I
think
first
of
all,
we
we
tend
not
to
talk
about
other
other
people's
sites
and
why
they're
ranking.
So
that's
that's
always
kind
of
tricky
and,
second
of
all,
the
I
think,
kind
of
the
underlying
assumption
that
google
domains
must
be
doing
something
kind
of
behind
the
scenes
to
get
this
kind
of
ranking.
A
A
A
A
But
essentially
this
policy
is
extremely
strict
on
google
side
and
we
do
not
kind
of
circumvent
that
to
help
any
particular
site,
and
it
goes
so
far
that
I
I
almost
feel
that
the
the
folks
who
work
on
seo
at
google-
they
almost
have
like
a
disadvantage
compared
to
other
other
people
in
that
they're
kind
of
stuck
in
this
weird
world
where,
if
they
went
and
asked
through
the
usual
channels
that
we
tell
them
to
use,
it
would
look
totally
awkward.
A
It's
like
these
people
from
google
are
asking
these
other
people
from
google
about
this
basic
question
and
therefore
they're
they're,
almost
like
stuck
in
the
situation.
Well,
okay,
maybe
we
won't
ask-
and
that
goes
so
far
as
questions
about
like
how
do
I
verify
my
site
in
search
console
and
it's
it's
not
even
about
about
ranking
a
lot
of
times.
So
from
from
that
point
of
view,
I
I
would
strongly
question
if,
like
google
domains,
has
any
kind
of
secret
insider
knowledge
with
regards
to
search
how
how
things
are
ranking.
A
Obviously
I
think
google
is
a
very
strong
brand
has
very
strong
websites
and
any
strong,
strong
company
might
have
some
advantages
in
that
regard
if
they
work
together.
But
it's
not
something
where,
from
a
search
point
of
view,
there's
any
inherent
advantage
to
any
given
google
property-
and
I
think
sometimes
you-
you
even
see
this
very
visibly
and
we
we
sometimes
see
case
studies
that
are
made
externally
where
they're
like.
A
Why
is
this
google
property
not
showing
up
at
all
in
search,
and
it
turns
out
well
they're
using
javascript
in
a
way
that
breaks
search
completely
and
anyone
can
figure
this
out?
But
these
google
engineers
like
we
thought
they
were
really
smart
people.
They
didn't
figure
it
out,
and
these
things
happen.
A
A
Let's
see,
the
next
question
is
about
chrome
user
experience,
report
data
also
kind
of
the
the
core
web
vitals
data
as
well
similar
to
to
the
previous
question,
and
it
kind
of
goes
into
the
aspect
of
well
there's
these
big
differences
with
the
testing
tool
versus
what
what
I
see
in
in
search
console
and
the
testing
tools
are
sometimes
really
weird.
A
I
I
don't
have
any
specific
insights
into
this.
This
particular
issue
here
and
it
looks
like
it's
also
being
raised
directly
with
the
chrome
team.
So
I
think
that's
fantastic.
I
think
that's
that's
about
the
best
approach
to
take
there,
because
we
use
the
chrome
data
as
a
basis
for
the
data
that
we
show.
A
So
that's
something
where
essentially
it's
it's,
I
think
going
in
the
right
direction.
I'm
not!
I
don't
know.
I
think
it's
it's
tricky
with
a
lot
of
these
core
web
vitals
issues,
and
I
see
various
questions
externally
about
them.
Where
they're
like.
How
do
I
figure
out?
What
is
actually
the
problem
here
or
is
there
even
a
problem
here?
A
Is
it
just
a
testing
tool
that
is
broken
and
I
I
think
a
lot
of
that
we
we
still
need
to
get
critical
feedback
on
these
kind
of
topics
and
make
sure
that
things
are
aligned
before
we
have
everything
ready
to
roll
out.
So
it's
it's
a
bit
of
a
rush,
I
think
on
both
sides,
but
it's
coming
together
fairly.
Well,
I
think,
how
can
we
help
speed
up
the
mobile
first
indexing
for
our
site?
Our
site
is
adaptive
and
mobile
friendly,
but
google
is
still
using
a
desktop
cloud.
A
I
totally
wouldn't
worry
about
this.
If
your
site
is,
if
from
what
you
can
tell
when
the
mobile
version
is
used,
has
all
of
the
content
that
you
need,
then
it
will
switch
over.
So
we
we
have
the
deadline
I
think
set
for
we
essentially
had
it
set
for
march.
A
I
think
there's
still
some
technical
details
with
the
the
last
sites
that
we're
working
out
so
that
we
can
switch
them
over
in
the
optimal
way,
but
at
some
point
it'll
just
be
switched
over
if
that's
like
still
in
march
or
maybe
in
april,
or
maybe
even
ends
up
in
may.
I
I
don't
know,
but
we're
we're
gonna
be
switching
over
all
of
these
sites
and
if
your
site
is
ready,
then
that
will
just
happen.
Then.
A
I
think,
from
from
what
I
I
heard
from
the
team,
we're
we're
currently
in
a
state
where
we're
not
automatically
moving
sites
over
anymore,
but
rather
kind
of
like
saving
all
of
these
up
for
for
that
last
moment,
and
then
switching
a
lot
of
those
over
at
once.
A
So
if
you've
improved
your
site
so
that
it
is
usable
for
mobile
first
indexing,
then
that'll
just
happen,
and
if
it's
already
showing
the
same
content
on
mobile
as
on
desktop,
then
you
wouldn't
see
any
effects.
It's
not
that
you
would
have
a
ranking
boost
or
any
kind
of
improvement
in
indexing.
Because
of
that,
even
though
breadcrumbs
help
provide
a
better
user
experience
on
the
site,
do
they
also
give
crawlers
better
context
that
will
translate
into
improved
rankings?
A
Probably
not
so
with
breadcrumbs
you're,
essentially
providing
links
to
the
higher
level
parts
of
your
website
and
for
the
most
part,
I
would
assume
that
you
already
have
links
to
the
higher
level
parts
of
your
website.
In
the
usual
ui,
so
probably
just
purely
from
a
crawling
point
of
view,
we
would
not
get
additional
information
just
from
the
breadcrumbs.
A
However,
breadcrumbs
are
shown
in
the
search
results,
so
it's
more
like
you're
getting
a
special
ui
in
the
search
results
for
these
breadcrumbs
and
not
that
you're
getting
better
rankings
or
that
you're
getting
better
crawling
from
that.
So
it's
I
think
it
still
makes
sense.
It's
just.
I
wouldn't
see
it
as
as
this
one
trick
to
improve
your
rankings.
A
What
are
the
best
practices
for
obtaining
site
links
from
google
when
someone
is
searching
for
your
brand
name?
We
we
don't
have
any
markup
for
site
links.
You
can't
force
them
to
appear.
Essentially
we
try
to
pick
those
up
when
we
think
we
have
multiple
pages
from
your
site,
which
are
relevant
when
a
user
is
searching
for
your
company's
name,
and
we
will
all
show
them
together.
So
essentially,
the
site
links
that
we
show
are
normal
organic
rankings
that
we
would
show.
A
We
just
show
them
in
a
slightly
different
way,
because
it
makes
sense
to
kind
of
group
them
together
to
make
it
easier
for
us
to
understand
which
pages
belong
together.
You
can
work
on
things
like
the
internal
structure
of
your
website,
so
that
it's
easier
for
us
to
understand
which
pages
belong
together,
that
you
have
clear
anchor
text
for
your
internal
links,
but
these
are
all
things
that
you
should
be
doing
anyway.
So
it's
not.
It's
usually
not
something
specific
that
you
need
to
do
to
make
these
site
links
appear.
A
A
I
would
not
guarantee
that
they
always
be
picked
up,
so
if
the
the
rendered
version
doesn't
have
them,
but
the
raw
html
version
does
have
them
it's
possible
that
we
will
like
use
the
rendered
version
for
this.
We
we
also
sometimes
use
the
raw
html
version,
depending
on
kind
of
the
the
current
status
of
of
that
page,
but
it's
not
guaranteed
that
we
would
kind
of
transfer
elements
from
the
raw
html
version
to
the
rendered
version
if
the
rendered
version
removes
them.
A
So
that's
something
where
probably
you
will
see
fluctuations
between
us
seeing
those
links
and
us
not
seeing
those
links.
So
if
you
think
these
links
are
important
for
your
website
that
we
can
crawl
your
website
better,
then
definitely
make
sure
that
they're
visible
to
users
as
well
in
the
rendered
version
upcoming
sitemove.
They
plan
to
gradually
push
new
site
over
to
users
over
a
month,
starting
at
just
10
percent
and
select
regions.
A
A
A
But
if,
if
you're
trying
to
recognize
users-
and
I
don't
know
how
how
you
would
do
that-
maybe
by
by
ip
addresses
or
by
cookies
or
whatever
and
you're,
sending
those
who
have
certain
attributes
over
to
your
new
site,
then
at
some
point
that
will
include
google
bot
as
well,
and
then
at
that
point
we
would
see
the
site
move.
So
that's
something
where
probably
depending
on
how
you
have
that
set
up.
We
would
see
that
move
all
happening
at
once
and
I
think
that's
generally
the
the
optimal
approach
there.
A
I
think,
with
a
site,
move
that
you're
doing
kind
of
step
by
step
like
this
or
kind
of
as
an
experimental
site
move.
I
would
expect
to
see
fluctuations
happening
there
because
it
it
gets
very
complicated
when
suddenly
users
start
linking
to
a
new
version
of
a
site
and
that
new
version
of
the
site
is
not
something
that
we've
seen
before
then
suddenly
we
we
have
both
of
these
indexed.
A
So
that's
something
where
I
I
would
assume
from
an
seo
point
of
view.
You
will
see
issues
until
all
of
this
has
settled
down
and
it
will
take
longer
than
a
normal
site
move
where
you
just
say
on
day
x.
We
move
everything
over
to
new
site,
and
sometimes
you
you
just
have
to
follow
along
with
that
and
say:
well,
the
the
marketing
team
wants
to
do
it
gradually
or
for
policy
reasons
or
whatever
reasons
we
have
to
do
it
like
this,
but
purely
from
an
seo
point
of
view.
A
Mobile
first,
you
previously
noticed
that
mdot
sites
could
have
issues
when
moved
over
to
mobile
first
indexing.
Is
this
still
the
case,
then?
Is
it
only
a
problem
for
google
if
the
annotations
per
google's
documentation
are
not
in
place,
so
the
the
annotations
are
important
that
we
can
recognize
the
mobile
and
the
desktop
versions.
So
that's
always
important
for
us.
That's
less
of
a
topic
with
regards
to
mobile
first
indexing,
but
more
that
we
can
show
the
right
urls
to
users
in
the
search
results.
A
You
can
also
help
us
with
that
by
setting
up
redirects.
So
if
mobile
users
go
to
the
desktop
page,
then
redirect
them
to
the
mobile
page.
Desktop
users
go
to
your
mobile
page,
redirect
them
to
the
desktop
page.
That's
another
way.
You
can
help
us
with
that.
Usually
the
issues
that
we
see
with
these
kind
of
sites
are
not
kind
of
around
the
annotations,
but
more
around
the
content
that
you
show.
A
So
if
the
mdot
version
has
less
content,
then
that
would
be
a
case
where,
if
we
switch
over
to
mobile
first
indexing,
we
would
have
less
content.
So
that's
usually
where
those
issues
would
would
come
from.
So
from
a
practical
point
of
view,
I
I
think
the
content
side,
you
can
probably
test
you
can
try
out
individually.
There
are
also
some
testing
tools
that
give
you
a
little
bit
information
there
and
based
on
that,
that's
something
where
I
I
would
think
about
like.
A
How
can
I
tell
googlebot
that
it
should
stop
using
my
cookie
disclaimer
as
a
description
to
a
page
and
instead
use
the
description
I
added
to
the
meta
tag,
it's
an
angular
site
with
server
side,
rendering
and
the
server
side,
rendering
version.
I
admitted
it
omitted
the
cookie
pop-up,
but
it
still
gets
used
as
a
description.
A
So
my
guess
I
so
I
I
think
the
last
part
of
the
the
question
is
kind
of
one
aspect
that
you
definitely
need
to
watch
out
for,
if
you're,
if
you
think,
you're
serving
google
about
the
content
without
this
cookie
disclaimer
and
google
is
still
using
the
cookie
disclaimer
in
the
description,
then
probably
that
serving
side
is
not
working.
The
way
that
you
expect
it
so
probably
there's
a
bug
somewhere
on
your
side
that
you're
serving
google
bought
the
cookie
pop-up
anyway.
A
In
general,
though,
serving
google
bought
a
cookie
banner,
something
like
that
is
not
a
bad
thing,
as
long
as
the
actual
content
is
still
in
the
html.
So
if
you're
showing
something
like
a
cookie,
pop-up
or
cookie
banner
on
top
of
your
normal
html,
then
that
should
work
perfectly
fine,
if
you're
serving
this
cookie
banner
instead
of
your
normal
html.
A
So
if
you
have
an
interstitial,
you're
redirecting
somewhere
else
or
you're,
only
loading
the
full
content
after
a
user
has
gone
through
this
interstitial,
then
that
would
be
a
problem
for
search
and
you
can
test
that
in
a
search
console
using
the
inspect
url
tool
and
there
you
can
look
at
the
html
that
is
returned
and
you
can
search
for
some
pieces
of
text
that
you
know
you
have
on
your
site
and
we
should
be
able
to
find
that.
So
I
think
that's
kind
of
a
critical
point
there.
A
A
The
other
thing
there
is,
you
could
also
use
kind
of
a
separate
javascript
file
that
is
blocked
by
robot's
text
with
the
cookie
banner.
From
our
point
of
view,
that
would
also
be
fine
and
if
it's
a
separate
javascript
file,
that's
blocked
by
robot's
text.
We
wouldn't
be
able
to
process
the
cookie
banner
and
we
would
just
see
the
site
without
that.
A
So
maybe
maybe
that's
an
option.
I
don't
know.
Sometimes
there
are
also
policy
requirements
in
play
which
make
this
a
lot
harder.
So
with
cookie
banners,
it's
it's
kind
of
easier,
but
if
you
have
other
legal
consent
requirements
such
as
age
interstitials
or
maybe
you
need
to
block
individual
countries,
then
that
makes
it
a
lot
harder
with
regards
to
search
and
then
it
gets
really
complicated
and
tricky.
But
cookie
banners
should
be
something
that
should
be
doable
so
that
we
can
index
these
pages
properly
cool
wow.
A
We
still
have
a
ton
of
questions
left
and
so
many
raised
hands
as
well,
but
I
I
think
I
need
to
pause
the
recording
for
now
so
that
we
have
a
reasonably
length
of
a
video
I'll
be
around
a
bit
longer.
A
So
if
any
of
you
want
to
stick
around
longer
and
ask
more
questions,
feel
free
to
do
that,
but
otherwise
thanks
so
much
for
all
of
the
submitted
questions
thanks
so
much
for
for
all
of
the
live
questions
as
well
so
far
and
hope,
if
you're
watching
this
as
a
video,
this
was
insightful
and
useful
for
you
and
maybe
you'll,
join
us
in
one
of
the
future
hangouts
as
well.
So
thanks
a
lot
and
see
you
next.