►
From YouTube: English Google SEO office-hours from March 12, 2021
Description
This is a recording of the Google SEO office-hours hangout from March 12, 2021. These sessions are open to anything webmaster related like crawling, indexing, mobile sites, internationalization, duplicate content, Sitemaps, Search Console, pagination, duplicate content, multi-lingual/multi-regional sites, etc.
Find out more at https://developers.google.com/search/events/join-office-hours
Feel free to join us - we welcome webmasters of all levels!
A
Hi
everyone
and
welcome
to
today's
google
search
central
seo
office
hours.
My
name
is
john
mueller.
I'm
a
search
advocate
at
on
the
google
search
relations
team
and
part
of
what
we
do
are
these
office
hour
hangouts,
where
people
can
join
in
and
ask
their
questions
all
around
search
and
their
websites.
A
So
many
people
joining
us
today
is
fantastic
cool
to
see
a
bunch
of
new
names
and
faces
as
well.
So
that's
always
neat
and
bunch
of
things
were
submitted
on
on
youtube
as
well.
But
as
always,
maybe
we
can
get
started
with
some
first
questions
and
I
think
what
probably
works
easiest
is
if
you're
live
in
here,
just
use
the
raised
hand
feature
and
then
I'll
try
to
go
through
in
in
that
order
and
wow
okay,
lots
of
people
raising
hands
already:
okay
praveen.
Maybe
you
can
get
started
with
your
question.
B
So
it's
a
bit
weird
and
long
question,
so
please
don't
mind
so
there's
this
website
we
have,
which
is
a
global
website,
and
they
have
pages
in
multiple
languages
like
in
english
and
like
japanese
and
korean,
so
this
website
has
implemented
hreflin
tags
and
all
that
stuff
and
they're
doing
pretty
good
in
google
in
all
the
local
regions.
B
Now
the
problem
is
that
in
south
korea
there
is
a
local
search
engine
called
neighbor
and
never
has
problem
with
these
href
syntax
like
it
doesn't
understand
them,
and
this
website
has
this
languages
like
they
have
used
directory
system
folder
system
for
multiple
language,
multiple
languages.
They
are
not
using
subdomains
or
separate
domains,
and
this
makes
even
harder
for
neighbor
to
understand
that
this
website
is
in
multiple
languages.
So
the
solution.
So
what
it
does
is.
It
shows
english
version
to
the
korean
audience
for
korean
queries
and
that's
the
problem.
The
management
had
decided.
B
Why
not?
We
should
make
a
separate
website
for
korean
audience
in
only
korean
language,
and
the
concern
from
google's
point
of
view
is
that
if
we
allow
that
website
to
be
indexed
by
google
too,
can
that
new
website
impact
performance
of
the
existing
global
website
like
is
there
a
possibility
that,
because
google
can
figure
out
that
both
these
websites
belongs
to
the
same
domain
and
they
are
basically
targeting
targeting
the
same
audience,
but
that
new
website
won't
be
just
copy
paste.
B
It
will
be
with
a
website
with
new
user
interface,
new,
fresh
content
and
everything
will
be
new.
The
only
concern
is:
can
the
new
website
impact
performance
of
the
existing
website,
because
that
existing
website
is
doing
pretty
good
on
google?
I
I
think.
A
Oops
a
little
bit
echo
somewhere.
I
I
think
if
it's,
if
it's
a
completely
separate
website,
then
it's
a
completely
separate
website.
So
that's
no
concern
from
from
that
point
of
view.
If,
if
it's
just
on
a
different
domain-
and
it's
essentially
a
part
of
the
same
set
of
pages,
you
can
still
use
ahreflang
between
those
different
domains,
so
hreflang
doesn't
have
to
be
just
within
one
domain.
A
B
Actually,
don't
want
to
confuse
google
with,
like
we
have
so
many
pages
on
directory
system,
and
then
one
is
on
the
subdomain.
So
we
just
want
to
keep
things
simple.
So
the
only
new
website
should
not
impact
the
performance
of
the
existing
website.
A
A
But
if
these
are
queries,
where
your
site
is
very
visible
anyway,
then
probably
it
doesn't
make
a
big
difference,
but
essentially
that's
up
to
you.
It's
not
it's
not
that
the
web
spam
team
will
look
at
this
and
say:
oh
two
websites
is
too
much
sure.
Thank
you.
That's
a
thank
you
sure,
xiao
chen,
oh
man.
We
cannot
pronounce.
D
Your
name.
Sorry,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
also
typed
my
question
here.
So
my
question
is
a
while
ago
I
was
reading
one
that's
google's
guide.
They
say
that
do
not
index
internal
search
result
because
they
generally
not
serve
user
intent.
Well,
I
agree
with
that.
If
it's
an
informational
site,
because
people
won't
be
landing
on
the
page.
That
directly
answer
your
question.
D
However,
I'm
not
quite
sure
it's
also
the
same
for
e-commerce
site,
for
example,
when
you
are
searching
for,
for
example,
sling
computer
and
the
first
result
is
actually
amazon's
search,
internal
search
result
page
and
as
a
customer,
I
won't
be
unhappy
seeing
that
because
it
did
provide
a
lot
of
options
for
me
to
buy,
and
so
my
question
is
just
that
for
for,
like
a
very,
very,
like
transactional
account
transactional
intent,
keyword,
e-commerce
site,
it's
also
not
recommended
to
index
internal
research
page
a
third.
A
Page,
so
I
think
that's
something
where
you
could
argue
that
these
are
more
like
category
pages
or
where
you
could
say.
Well,
it's
more
like
a
category
page
and
it's
indexable.
A
The
the
tricky
part
with
internal
search
pages
is
that
it's
often
an
infinite
space
in
that
you
can
enter
any
random
word
and
it'll
create
a
web
page
for
it
and
that's
something
you
kind
of
want
to
avoid.
But
if
there
are
specific
topics
where
you
say
this
is
kind
of
like
an
important
topic,
then
you
can
definitely
keep
that
indexed.
It's
not
that,
like
the
webstorm
team
is
reviewing
these
and
seeing
oh
internal
search.
D
I
see
thank
you
so
much
so
would
you
recommend
only
pick
some
of
those
internal
search
pages
to
index
while
blocking
the
majority
of
them.
A
Yeah,
I
I
think,
if,
if
you
can
do
that,
that's
that's
what
I
would
do
like
take
take
a
list
of
keywords
where
you're
saying
these
are
okay
and
everything
else
just
block
those
just
to
avoid
the
situation
that
people
create
random
pages
for
random
words
or
also
what
I've
sometimes
seen.
Is
people
create
pages
for
words
that
you
don't
want
to
rank
for,
like
I
don't
know,
maybe
they're
searching
for
medical
terms
and
your
website
is
about
computer
products,
then
you
don't
want
to
rank
for
that
content.
E
Yes,
no,
I
was
muted,
sorry.
Thank
you.
Okay.
I
have
a
few
questions,
but
I
think
they're,
quick,
so
I'll
try
to
get
through
them
number
one
is
if
enhancing
core
web
vitals,
let's
say,
reduces
the
we
get
rid
of
a
bunch
of
old
scripts
and
reduces
the
page
size
in
half.
Would
that
correlate
with
an
increase
of
crawl
rate
budget.
A
Maybe
maybe
so
the
there
are
two
things
there.
On
the
one
hand,
if
we
can
access
your
html
pages
faster,
we
can
probably
crawl
more,
so
that
would
kind
of
go
into
the
crawl
budget
side
of
things.
The
other
part
is
if
we
can
render
your
pages
faster,
if
they're
javascript
pages,
then
we
can
also
get
through
them
faster,
but
it
all
depends
on
the
demand
as
well,
so
for
crawl
budget.
We
have
kind
of
the
capacity
of
the
website
and
the
demand
from
our
side.
E
Got
it
now,
the
other
question
is
a
little
more
difficult.
I
basically
there's
the
amount
of
pages
that
are
being
indexed
by
google
in
the
in
the
coverage
report
and
then,
if
I
go
to
the
internal
link
report
in
the
link
section,
I
see
that
all
the
links
that
are
in
the
header
and
footer
are
the
top
ones
with
the
same
number
pretty
much.
So
I
know
that
it's
collecting
those
as
internal
links
to
report
on
regardless
of
its
effect
or
impact.
E
But
the
number
is
a
tiny
fraction
of
the
total
index
pages
and
when
I
do
a
site
search
in
google,
it's
somewhere
around
the
range
of
the
total
index
pages
in
the
coverage
report.
But
then
I
go
to
the
internal
link
section
and
it's
it's
I'm
talking
about
indexed
is
six
million
and
in
the
in
internal
links,
is,
is
30
000
for
all
of
those
header,
footer
pages
and
those
are
on
every
one
of
those
pages.
A
E
Got
it
so
it's
just
to
get
an
idea
of
which
internal
links
are
found
more
often
than
others
exactly
okay
and
then
the
next
thing
is
she
mentioned
it
about
the
url
parameters
for
search
pages,
if
you're
dealing
with
a
site
that
the
search
is
set
up,
that
it
auto
corrects
and
redirects
to
a
proper
search
that
we
want.
That's
in
our
site
map
that's
relevant.
E
Is
that
a
redirect
that
will
hurt
like
in
terms
of
crawl
budget,
because
it
could
be
anything
someone
could
put
input
anything
even
though
it
will
find
the
right
page,
probably
the
most
relevant
on
the
site?
Is
it
gonna
impact
anything
and
how.
E
A
I
think
a
small
number
of
redirects
immediately
and
it's
kind
of
seen
as
a
part
of
the
same
request,
and
I
think
the
limit
is
something
like
five,
something
like
that
where,
if
there
are
five
redirects
in
a
row,
we'll
just
follow
that
and
look
at
the
final
content
and
treat
that
as
one
one
request.
If
it
takes
more
than
five
steps,
then
we
would
treat
that
as
separate
requests,
but
usually
for
something
like
this.
A
F
G
Sure
can
you
hear
me
yes
great,
so
our
question
has
to
do
with
core
web
vitals
I'll
post
it
here
in
the
chat.
Basically,
we
want
to
know
how
it
relates
to
amp,
so
we
have
enhanced
our
site
for
amp
and
90
of
our
mobile
traffic
goes
to
amp
pages,
but
now
we're
addressing
like
core
web
vital
stuff,
but
in
our
core
web
vitals
dashboard
looks
like
only
50
of
our
pages
are
like
hitting
good
marks
there
for
mobile.
We
spent
a
lot
of
time
doing
amp.
A
I
don't
think
you
would
be
penalized
for
for
that
in
in
that
sense,
but
what
I
mean,
what
what
happens
on
our
side
with
regards
to
the
core
web
vitals?
Is
we
use
the
chrome
user
experience
report
data
as
kind
of
the
baseline,
and
we
try
to
segment
the
site
in
into
parts
what
we
can
recognize
there
from
the
chrome
user
experience
report,
which
I
think
is
also
reflected
in
the
search
console
report
and
based
on
those
sections.
A
When
it
comes
to
specific
urls,
we
will
try
to
find
the
most
appropriate
group
to
fit
that
into.
So.
If,
if
someone
is
searching,
for
example,
for
amp
pages
within
your
site-
and
you
have
a
separate
amp
section
or
you
have
a
separate
amp
template
that
we
can
recognize,
then
essentially
we'll
be
using
those
metrics
for
those
pages.
A
A
We
will
treat
that
as
as
one
group,
so
if
those
are
good,
then
essentially
pages
that
fall
into
those
groups
are
good.
The
the
tricky
part
I
think
with
the
amp
report
is
that
we,
we
show
the
the
pages
there,
but
we
don't
really
include
information
on
how
much
traffic
goes
to
each
of
those
parts.
So
it
might
be
that
you
have
let's
say
100
pages
that
are
listed
there
and
your
primary
traffic
goes
to
10
of
those
pages.
A
Then
it
could
look
like
you
have
like
all
of
these,
like
90
or
slow.
Perhaps
if
those
90
other
pages
are
slow
and
those
10
that
people
go
to
are
fast,
but
actually
like
the
majority
of
your
people
will
be
going
to
those
fast
pages
and
we'll
take
that
into
account.
F
So
two
follow-up
questions
there.
One
you
mentioned
that
you
segment
these
results
into
like
different
sections
right.
So
when
I
look
in
the
search
console
you're
right,
I
can
see
that
they're
like
grouped
together,
but
I
see
the
amp
and
the
non-amp
pages
separately.
So
will
you
take
into?
If
I
you
know,
if
you
do
a
search
result-
and
I
have
you
know-
maybe
a
site-
that's
not
amp
canonical,
but
you're,
showing
an
empty
result
for.
Would
I
use
it
will
use
the
results
from
the
amp
section
of
that
page.
E
But
it
has.
A
A
We
we
would
follow
the
canonical
and
use
use
it
based
on
that.
Okay,
so.
A
We
I
mean
what
we
do
is
we
take
into
account
what
users
see.
So
if
it's
a
valid
amp
page
and
we
can
serve
it
from
the
cache,
then
we'll
use
that,
whereas,
if
it's
a
kind
of
not
a
valid
amp
page-
and
it's
still
an
amp
page
and
pretty
fast,
but
we
can't
serve
it
from
the
cache,
then
obviously
we
don't
use
that.
F
A
A
And
we
will
notice
that,
like
the
the
canonical
url
and
the
cache
page
and
those
urls
change
fairly
quickly,
so
it's
it's
more
something
where
I'd
say
you
have
that
time
period
between
when
we
know
about
the
url,
when
we
show
it
in
the
search
and
when
we've
updated
it,
which
might
be.
I
don't
know
a
couple
days
time,
so
it's
it's
definitely
less
critical
than
with
the
normal
pages.
But
ideally
you
would
still
redirect
those
as
well.
C
Okay
and
then
I
have
a
second
question
ready
to
amp
again,
so
I
think
it's
been
stated
a
few
times
that
there
isn't
a
direct
ranking
boost
a
ranking
factor
from
amp.
However,
last
year
we
removed
our
amp
pages
and
we
redirected
amp
urls
to
our
clinical
pages,
and
then
we
saw
a
decrease
in
traffic
straight
away,
but
over
six
days
it
was
10
decrease
in
organic
traffic.
So
we
so
we
redeployed
it.
We
turned
it
back
on
because
we
didn't
want
to
keep
losing
traffic.
A
I
don't
know
it,
it
kind
of
depends
on
the
site,
so
they
on.
On
the
one
hand,
I
I
think
there
there
might
be
an
effect
of
things,
just
kind
of
like
still
pointing
at
the
amp
pages
and
kind
of
getting
lost
if
you
just
turn
it
off.
So
that's
something
that
would
be
something
more
of
a
temporary
effect,
that's
something
you
can
also
try
to
mitigate
by
using
the
the
amp
cache
api.
A
I
think
where
you
can
force
a
refresh
so
that
we
can
see
like
these
amp
pages,
actually
no
longer
exist
kind
of
thing.
I
think
we
have
a
help
center
article
on
on
disabling
amp.
Actually
that
covers
like
all
of
those
steps.
The
other
effect
that
you
might
be
seeing
there,
depending
on
the
type
of
site,
is
that
for
certain
search,
experiences,
kind
of
like
search
search,
features
that
we
show
in
the
search
results.
We
we
do
use
amp.
A
So
I
think
that's
in
particular
the
top
story
section
on
mobile,
where
we
essentially
require
amp
pages,
at
least
at
the
moment,
and
if,
if
it's
a
news
website,
for
example,
that
has
a
lot
of
content.
That
is
shown
in
the
top
story
section
when
it's
on
amp,
then
you
will
see
that
kind
of
disappear.
A
That's
something
where,
with
the
update
that
we're
doing
in
may
around
core
web
vitals
and
page
experience,
we're
going
to
start
allowing
normal
pages
as
well
when
they
reach
that
that
appropriate
bar
to
be
visible
in
the
top
story.
Section
so
that'll
be
a
little
bit
more
mitigated,
but
it
really
depends
on
the
kind
of
site
like
if
it's
not
a
news
website.
If
there's
no
kind
of
newsy
content
on
there,
that
would
would
have
been
featured
in
the
top
stories
section.
C
Okay,
yeah:
it's
not
a
direct
news
website
per
se,
but
it's
a
medical
article
website
and
we
do
have.
We
do
a
feature
in
the
carousel,
amp
carousel,
so
yeah.
H
Hi,
I
I
work
in
an
iit
company.
We
put
lots
of
tons
of
tons
of
quality
content
at
our
website,
but
recently
we
got
to
know
that
there
are
few
websites
that
have
been
copying
our
content
and
publishing
it
on
their
website.
In
fact,
they
are
not
making
an
effort
to
change
the
images,
so
I
just
want
to
know
what
kind
of
action
we
can
take
or
how
does
google
consider
this
kind
of
activities
and
how
we
can
protect
ourselves
and
feel
for
future
regarding
these
fraudulent
activities.
A
A
The
dmca
process
is
a
legal
process,
so
I
can't
give
you
legal
advice
on
when
it
applies
and
when
it
would
not
apply,
but
that
might
be
something
that
you
could
look
into
with
the
dmca
process.
You're
basically
saying
my
content
is,
is
my
my
content
and
someone
else
has
copied
it
and
you're
giving
google
that
information
on
a
per
page
basis
and
based
on
that
our
systems
or
the
the
legal
team.
A
A
That
could
be
something
where
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
take
a
step
back
and
think
about
your
website
overall
and
try
to
find
ways
to
significantly
improve
the
quality
of
that
to
make
sure
that,
when
our
algorithms
run
across
your
website,
with
the
content
on
it
and
some
random
website
that
they
don't
know
about
with
the
same
content
on
it
that
they
say
well,
actually,
your
website
is
the
one
that
we
should
trust
and
not
so
much
like
some
random
website
is,
is
perhaps
just
as
good
or
kind
of
even
better
than
this
website
that
we
know
about
that.
A
H
Okay,
that
means
that
we
have
a
loopholes
in
our
own
website.
How
do
you
mean
like
we,
we,
we
are
not
up
to
that
quality.
That's
why
other
websites
are
copying
our
content.
A
I
I
don't
know
why
why
other
people
are
copying
your
content,
I
I
can't
say,
but
if,
if
you're
regularly,
seeing
that
the
copied
content
is
ranking
above
your
content,
then
to
me
that
would
point
at
some
kind
of
quality
worries
that
our
algorithms
have.
Okay,
thank
you
sure.
Darcy.
I
I
think
it
was
mid
or
late
february.
A
couple
of
the
tracking
tools
were
reporting.
Some
drops
in
featured
snippets
the
amount
of
times
that
those
showed
up.
I
Judging
by
your
reaction,
I
don't
know
if
you
are
familiar
with
that
at
all,
just
wondering
if,
if,
if,
if
that
was
deliberate
by
any
means
on
google
side
to
reduce
the
featured
snippets
from
showing
up
or
if
it
was
maybe
a
for
another
reason
that
that
might
be
happening,
that's
just
some,
you
know
featured
snippets
when
you
get
them
are
pretty
awesome
and
to
lose
them
is
pretty
disastrous.
I
A
I
don't
know
I
I
don't
know
like
the
the
featured
snippets
and
rich
results
in
general.
Those
kind
of
things
can
fluctuate
over
time,
and
I
know
the
teams
are
always
working
on
on
those
features
and
trying
to
fine-tune
the
triggering
so
when
we
would
show
them
or
when
we
wouldn't
show
them.
Sometimes
the
the
triggering
changes
over
time
that
we
just
kind
of
reduce
the
threshold
overall
or
that
we
change
the
focus
a
little
bit
and
say
it's
like
less
here
and
more
here.
A
Sometimes
that
happens
across
geographies
or
languages.
But
these
kind
of
changes
from
from
our
side
are
essentially
normal
organic
changes
in
search
how
they
can
always
happen.
So
it's
not.
It's
definitely
not
the
case
that
we
say
well
like
there's
some
technical
requirement.
That's
missing
on
these
pages.
Therefore
we
dropped
it.
It's
more.
We
we
need
to
refine
which,
which
types
of
results
we
show
over
time.
I
So
yeah
just
more
of
a
balancing
act,
I
guess
yeah
so
would
you
would
you
think
that
it
was
a
deliberate
kind
of
reduction
in
featured
snippets
or
maybe
some
other
change
that
might
have
then
caused
that
reduction.
A
Any
idea
yeah,
I
don't
know
yeah,
I
don't
know
I
usually
we
don't
think
of
it
as
much
as
we
want
to
reduce
the
the
number
of
times
we
show
a
feature,
but
rather
we
want
to
improve
the
targeting
and
the
relevance
of
when
we
show
the
feature,
and
sometimes
that
does
mean
overall,
it's
like
fewer,
but
it
might
be
that
they're
fewer
here
and
there's
a
little
bit
more
here
kind
of
kind
of
thing
and
that's
something
that
it
just
happens
over
time.
A
They're
they're
always
trying
to
find
a
better
balance
of
of
what
to
show
and
search
and
improve
that
gotcha
cool.
Thank.
A
Sure
clint.
J
Good
morning,
john,
my
question
relates
to
the
to
the
mobile
index
and
specifically,
a
responsive
design.
So
if,
for
example,
there
is
an
element
on
the
page
which
links
to
you
know-
let's
say
it's
a
you
know
online
catalog
or
something
like
that,
so
that
component
on
the
page
is
essentially
linking
to
the
catalog.
The
catalog
itself
is
not
mobile
friendly.
So
as
a
result
under
the
responsive
design,
we
would
basically
hide
that
component,
but
essentially
it's
still
part
of
the
dom.
J
A
A
Yeah,
no,
I
sometimes
what
we
try
to
do
is
figure
out
which
parts
of
a
page
are
visible
and
kind
of
empathize
emphasize
those
in
the
with
regards
to
ranking,
but
especially
on
mobile.
We
see
that
there's
a
lot
more
interactivity
on
a
page
in
that
you
kind
of
activate
different
tabs.
You
kind
of
see
different
things
and
actually
it's
all
a
part
of
the
same
html
page
and
from
that
point
of
view
like,
if
it's,
if
it's
not
visible,
but
it's
in
the
html
in
the
dom,
then
that
would
work
for
us.
E
K
I
am
very
interested
that
I
can't
talk
with
you,
john.
I
was
waiting
for
this
online
session
because
of
a
particular
reason.
I
have
four
more
important
questions
for
an
extra
purpose,
but
the
four
questions
are
somehow
big.
Then
I
will
ask
the
first
two
questions.
I
wish
that
I
can
get
sometimes
during
the
session
to
to
ask
the
very
many
questions.
K
First
of
all,
for
websites
that
have
amp
pages
at
non-amp
pages,
how
we
can
measure
the
core
with
vitals
to
get
a
general
idea
idea
about
the
whole
performance
of
the
website.
I
mean
that.
Do
we
need
to
measure
the
performance
of
amp
pages
alone
and
the
non
amp
pages
alone.
What
is
the
the
best
practice
here.
A
So
you
you,
depending
on
the
way
that
you
have
the
amp
and
non-amp
pages
set
up.
You
may
be
able
to
see
the
difference
in
search
console
or
in
the
chrome
user
experience
report
data,
because
that
could
be
split
out
by
url.
So
I
I
would
double
check
that.
The
other
thing
that
you
definitely
can
do
is
do
lab
testing,
especially
if
you're
modifying
pages.
A
If
you're
trying
things
out,
then
I
would
do
lab
testing
with
like
page
speed
insights
with
chrome
directly
in
the
browser
to
test
things,
especially
to
compare
different
versions
of
the
same
page
and
when
it
comes
to
lab
testing
for
amp
pages.
If
it's
a
valid
amp
page,
then
definitely
also
check
it
on
the
amp
cache
so
to
see
what
what
users
would
see
when
they
click
on
a
search
result,
and
that's
that's
kind
of
the
approach
that
I
would
take
there.
A
K
A
I
don't
know
so
that's
something
I
I
would
check
with
the
analytics
team
and
with
the
analytics
help
forum
to
get
some
input
there.
The
the
one
thing
I
I
would
kind
of
suspect,
but
I
don't
know
how
how
it's
implemented
on
your
side
is.
Since
you
mentioned
amp
pages,
it's
possible
that
the
amp
pages
are
being
tracked
separately
in
analytics.
A
So
depending
on
how
you
have
amp
set
up,
it
might
be
that
you
have
a
separate
property
for
the
analytics
pages
and
they're
kind
of
separated
out,
whereas
in
search
console
we
focus
on
the
canonical
url,
so
we
would
show
all
of
that
traffic
together.
So
that
might
be
one
reason,
but
I
I
would
really
get
some
tips
from
the
amp
help
forum.
K
But
but
sorry
sometimes
sometimes
we
saw
a
vice
versa
data.
We
saw
that
google
analytics
show
that
more
than
the
the
real
data
on
google
search
console,
not
not
every
time
google
search
console
shows
data
more
than
the
number
of
organic
traffic
at
google
analytics.
A
Is
it
really
from
google
search
or
is
it
someone
just
using
the
wrong
referrer
like
this
kind
of
weird
kind
of
I
don't
know
weird
behavior
is,
is
pretty
common,
it
just
happens
on
the
web,
so
sometimes
you
do
see
some
discrepancies,
but
especially
if
you
see
a
lot
more
data
in
search
console
than
in
analytics,
then
to
me
that
feels
like
something
in
analytics
is
tracking
wrong.
A
Sure
read
to
I
I
don't
know
if
I'm
pronouncing
your
name
right,
hey.
A
L
Actually,
I
have
a
few
questions
related
to
schema.
Actually,
I
have
implemented
schema
markup
for
knowledge
panel
graph
on
my
website,
but
still
it
is
not
appearing
knowledge
graph.
Please,
let
me
know
which
factors
we
need
to
consider
like
to
implement
knowledge
panel
graph
for
a
brand.
A
Yeah,
I
I
don't
think,
there's
any
specific
markup
that
you
can
use
to
force
a
knowledge
panel,
okay
to
to
appear
for
a
brand.
So
what
you
can
do
is
give
some
general
company
information
like
like
the
logo
like
address
opening
hours.
Things
like
that,
but
just
because
that
specified
in
structured
data
doesn't
guarantee
that
we
will
show
us
a
knowledge
panel
entry.
Sometimes
what
you
can
also
do
is
the
google
my
business
entry,
which
also
appears
in
the
side
similar
to
a
knowledge
graph
entry.
L
Okay,
my
another
question
is
related
to
site
links.
Actually,
I
need
to
appear.
Some
desired
pages
is
cycling
in
google
scrp,
but
still
I'm
trying
from
last
six
months-
and
I
have
even
lots
of
activities,
but
still
my
desired
pieces
are
not
appearing
as
a
cycling
in
google
serp.
Please
let
me
know
what
can
I
do
for
this.
A
We
try
to
pick
up
the
site
links
based
on
your
site's
internal
navigation,
primarily
so,
if
we
can
understand
how
people
can
kind
of
navigate
your
website
better,
then
we
have
more
of
an
opportunity
to
show
site
links,
but
it's
not
guaranteed
that
they
will
be
shown
and
for
most
websites.
I
think
we
we
just
don't
show
side
links.
A
Yeah
the
site
link
search
box
is
something
where
you
can
add
structured
data
to
your
pages
too,
but
the
structured
data
is
only
used
when
we
show
the
sitelink
search
box
and
it's
similar
to
site
links
in
that
for
a
lot
of
sites.
We
just
don't
show
the
sitelink
search
box.
I
think
it's
it's
a
confusing
feature
because
of
that
because
you
can
add
markup,
but
the
markup
only
has
an
effect
if
we
would
already
show
something
for
your
site.
A
A
M
Okay,
I
have
a
question
I
have.
My
website
have
problems
with
related
hundreds.
M
M
To
new
ul
is
that
I
have
any
problem
with
my
website
for
our
hong
kong
city.
If
that's
my,
I
have
problem
from
when
I
do
redirect.
Please
please:
okay,.
M
Yes!
Yes,
yes,
when,
yes
to
lean
flynn,
uef
to
clean
your
to
clean.
A
M
A
M
A
Understand
yes,
a
little
bit
it's
hard,
but
in
general,
when,
when
you
redirect
from
one
url
to
another,
we
try
to
forward
all
of
those
signals.
A
M
A
C
A
N
John,
the
the
question
is
also
in
the
chat.
I
think
it's.
N
More
clearer
with
the
structure
there,
I
think
it's
the
case
that
there
are
some
district
related
pages
that
have
canonical
to
the
main
city
page,
but
the.
C
N
The
new
structure
includes
a
separate
district
page
as
a
as
as
their
own
pages.
So
what
what
would
happen
if
those
all
those
parameter
urls
are
then
redirected
to
the
new
district
pages
if
they
had
a
canonical
until
now
to
the
main
city
page.
A
Yeah
I
they,
as
I
understand
it,
it's
like
we
would
follow
these
redirects
on
a
per
page
basis
and
if
there
are
individual
redirects
there
that
take
place
where
you
have
multiple
pages
redirecting
to
one
page
or
if
you
have
individual,
like
this
parameter,
url
redirecting
to
one
clean
url,
and
you
have
other
pages
that
stay
the
same.
That's
like
we!
A
We
would
all
look
at
that
on
a
per
page
basis,
so
I
think
if
you're
cleaning
things
up
like
for
a
handful
of
pages
for
different
sections
of
your
website,
that's
that's
perfectly
fine
to
do
like
this.
M
M
A
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
very
common
problem.
If
you
have
a
kind
of
classified
content,
then
it
it
comes
and
goes
fairly
quickly.
Yeah.
There
are
two
approaches
that
people
take
and
for
us
they
they
are
very
similar.
So
one
is
to
say
the
old
product
that
no
longer
exists
or
the
the
page
that
no
longer
exists
redirects
to
the
category
page
to
us.
That
would
be
seen
as
a
soft
404,
which
is
something
we
we
discourage,
but
for
users.
Maybe
it's
okay.
A
The
other
is
to
just
say
this
page
that
no
longer
exists
returns
a
404
error
and
then
we
would
just
drop
that
page.
So
in
practice,
in
both
of
these
cases,
the
old
page
will
drop
out
of
the
search
results
and
we
will
be
able
to
focus
on
the
rest
of
the
website
more
so
the
only
thing
I
I
would
not
recommend
doing
is
for
the
long
run,
keeping
the
old
page
and
just
adding
like
a
label
on
top
saying.
Oh,
this
is
obsolete.
A
M
N
Hey
john,
by
the
way,
regarding
the
the
question
in
the
chat,
I
think
a
more
general
I
mean
to
put
it
in
a
more
general
way
is
to
is
when
you
have
a
lot
of
urls
doing
something
like
they
all
have
a
canonical
to
a
certain
page,
and
then
you
change
it
and
all
of
those
urls
no
longer
have
a
canonical,
but
they
do
something
else.
Maybe
they're
just
indexable.
N
Maybe
let's
say
you
have
an
e-commerce
website
and
you
have
a
category
page
and
all
of
the
filters
or
something
like
that.
They
all
have
a
canonical
back
to
the
main
category
page.
But
then
you
decide.
Okay,
I
need
those
filters
to
be
indexed
or
redirect
them
somewhere.
I
don't
know
and
you
break
the
canonical
and
then
you
use
them
in
whatever
other
way
you
want
to
use
them.
N
A
N
Right,
but
that
means
that
if
you
start
making
the
blue
car
indexable
or
do
it
whatever
else
with
it,
that
means
that
the
blue
car
will
start
gaining,
maybe
in
in
rankings
and
get
traffic,
especially
if
it
has
links
and
everything
else,
but
you're
no
longer
canonicalizing
to
the
green
car,
so
the
green
car
kind
of
loses
that
loses
those
ranking
signals
that
came
through
the
canonical
until
now.
So
it's
yeah,
you
lose
some,
but
you
might
get
a
lot
more
traffic
by
being
more
specific
towards
certain
queries.
A
N
So
I
want
to
ask
very
quickly
about
something
regarding
core
web
vitals
in
search
console
because
the
core
web
vitals
are
taken
from
the
chrome
user
experience
report.
So
the
data
in
search
console
is
taken
from
the
chrome
user
experience
report.
Yet
for
let's
say
you
have
a
cls
issue
with
a
bunch
of
your
pages,
you
have
the
option
to
validate
fix,
but
that
doesn't
make
as
much
sense
as
you
would
validate
fix
on
a
coverage
report
because
it
doesn't
matter
if
google
recruits
those
pages.
N
A
Yeah
yeah
we
we
have
that
there
for
consistency,
reasons,
but
it's
based
on,
like
you
said,
like
the
chrome
user
experience
report
data,
so
it's
not.
It
wouldn't
be
the
case
that
we
would
be
able
to
say
it's
like
more
people
should
click
on
this
link,
and
then
we
have
more
data
to
look
at.
We
basically
have
to
wait
for
things
to
to
update
there.
N
A
Makes
sense
cool
we're
running
low
on
time,
so
let
me
just
go
through
some
of
the
questions
that
were
submitted
that
we
didn't
get
to
yet
and
I'll
stick
around
a
little
bit
longer.
If
anyone
wants
to
to
chat
for
more
as
well.
The
the
first
one
I
have
on
top
is
about
amp.
A
I
think
we
talked
about
that
also
amp,
the
ranking
factor.
Will
google
consider
the
origins
field
core
web
vitals
data
for
the
whole
domain,
or
will
it
be
ranking
on
a
per
page
basis?
We
talked
about
that
a
bit
as
well
kind
of
the
different
groupings
that
we
show
how
accurate
is
crawled,
currently
not
indexed
in
search
console
despite
being
a
page
with
sufficient
content
without
issues,
many
pages
are
excluded
from
the
site
from
being
indexed,
that's
fairly
common.
A
So
for
the
most
part
we
don't
index
all
pages
that
we
know
about
on
a
website.
We
have
to
prioritize
a
little
bit,
so
that's
something
where
it's
less
a
matter
of
like
this
individual
page
is
fantastic,
but
more
that
we
need
to
understand
that.
There's
a
lot
of
value
to
be
gained
from
showing
your
website
more
visibly
in
search
and
that's
something
that's
more
of
a
like
a
long-term
process
and
less
something
on
a
per
url
basis.
Where
you
can
say
this
page
is
good
now
for
passage.
Indexing
rolling
out
does
passage.
A
Indexing
relate
with
core
web
vitals
for
ranking
or
indexing
factors.
No,
that's
something
completely
separate.
Also
passage.
Indexing
is
a
kind
of
a
bad
name.
I
hope
the
people
who
decided
on
calling
it
indexing
don't
listen,
but
it's
it's
not
based
on
indexing,
so
nothing
changes
with
indexing.
It's
really
based
on
ranking.
So
understanding
what
is
on
a
page
and
how
to
show
that
in
the
search
results,
does
the
url
parameters
tool
in
the
old
search
console
still
work?
When
will
the
new
version
go
live?
Yes,
it
continues
to
work.
A
I
don't
know
of
any
date.
With
regards
to
new
version,
I
think
that's
one
where
we're
talking
with
the
team
to
figure
out
what
what
the
right
approach
is
there,
and
it
might
be
that
at
some
point
we
decide
well,
it
still
works,
but
it's
not
as
valuable
for
all
users
to
actually
migrate
to
the
new
version
of
search
console
and
maybe
it'll
go
away
at
some
point.
Maybe
it'll
be
migrated
in
in
a
different
way.
A
A
A
We
use
the
words
in
a
url
as
a
very,
very
lightweight
factor
and
from
what
I
recall,
this
is
primarily
something
that
we
would
take
into
account
when
we
haven't
had
access
to
the
content.
Yet
so
if
this
is
the
absolute
first
time
we
see
this
url,
we
don't
know
how
to
classify
its
content.
Then
we
might
use
the
words
in
the
in
the
url
as
something
to
help
rank
us
better.
A
The
only
effect
where
I
would
kind
of
worry
about
this
a
little
bit
is
that
users
might
be
a
bit
confused
if
they're
copy
and
pasting
your
url,
if
they're
recommending
it
to
other
people,
then
if
the
url
is
in
german-
and
it
doesn't
make
any
sense
at
all
to
them,
then
that
might
be
something
where
they're
like.
What
is
this
url
actually
about?
A
Usually,
if
it's,
if
it
has
like
product
names
in
there
or
descriptions
that
have
very
similar
words
in
english
and
german,
then
that's
less
of
an
issue.
But
if
the
url
were
in
japanese
and
the
users
were
in
the
us,
then
that
could
be
something
where,
like.
What
am
I
actually
forwarding
to
my
friends
here,
but
that's
not
an
seo
factor,
that's
more
of
a
marketing
issue.
A
But
I
would
strongly
recommend
using
normal
video
structure
data
on
a
page
as
well,
because
you
don't
want
to
rely
on
this
vague.
Google
might
be
able
to
figure
it
out
thing,
but
rather
you
want
to
really
clearly
provide
that
structured
data
to
google,
so
that
google
can
show
your
pages
as
proper
video
landing
pages,
because
it
has
all
of
the
information
that
it
needs
there.
A
So
that's
something
we
definitely
can
carry
some
things
over,
but
for
optimal
video
implementation
for
video,
optimization
in
search.
I
would
use
the
normal
video
structure
data.
Why?
In
the
crawlstats
report
and
search
console,
there
are
also
very
old
urls
that
are
sometimes
crawled
for
discovery
and
not
for
refresh.
A
A
A
We
will
figure
things
out
a
little
bit
more
fine
grain,
but
at
least
the
the
initial
announcement
that
we
made
is
based
purely
on
the
mobile
side,
and
that's
also
where,
for
the
most
part,
the
I
think
the
the
harder
barriers
are,
where
users
really
see
things
a
lot
slower
than
on
desktop,
because
on
desktop
you
tend
to
have
a
really
powerful
computer
and
you
often
have
a
wired
connection
and
on
mobile.
A
You
have
this
much
slimmed
down
processor,
with
less
capabilities
and
smaller
screen
and
then
a
slow
connection,
sometimes,
and
that's
where
it's
really
critical.
That
pages
load
very
fast
search,
console
data
question
data
on
the
search
console
ui
is
slightly
different
than
from
what's
pulled
from
the
api,
and
the
data
in
the
ui
looks
more
approximated.
Is
the
data
pulled
through
the
api
more
accurate,
so
both
of
these
sources
are
based
on
exact,
same
databases
internally
at
google.
A
That's
perfectly
fine,
so
we
do
try
to
understand
the
templates
of
a
page
and
to
understand
which
parts
of
the
page
are
the
primary
content
and
which
parts
are
more
boilerplates
like
everything
around
it.
The
menus,
the
footer
the
titles
things
like
that,
but
we
can
pick
that
up
for
different
parts
of
a
of
a
website
in
different
ways.
So
it's
not
that
the
whole
website
has
to
have
exactly
the
same
template
most
websites.
A
Don't
the
thing
I
would
watch
out
for
especially
since
you
mentioned
international
sites
is,
if
you're
using
hreflang
and
you
have
very
different
infrastructure
across
the
different
language
versions.
Then
it
makes
it
really
hard
to
link
those
pages
together
with
h
reference
playing.
A
It's
not
so
much
that
google
would
have
trouble
with
it,
but
if
you
can't
specify
the
href
flag
yourself
on
those
pages-
and
you
want
google
to
understand
the
connection
between
the
language
versions
or
the
country
versions,
then
that
just
makes
it
a
little
bit
harder,
but
purely
from
an
seo
point
of
view.
If
you
can
create
proper
hr
flang.
If
these
pages
are
normally
crawlable
and
indexable,
then
I
wouldn't
worry
about
that.
A
Okay,
wow,
so
many
questions
and
so
much
more
left.
Okay,
but
maybe
I
can
take
a
break
here,
pause
the
recording
and
if
any
of
you
want
to
stick
around
longer,
you're
welcome
to
do
that
as
well.
Thank
you
all
for
listening
in
for
watching
for
asking
so
many
questions.
A
It's
like
wow,
so
many
hands
are
still
up
so
many
questions
still
in
it
feels
like
we
could
do
these
for
hours
and
hours,
but
then
I
would
probably
I
don't
know,
fall
into
the
ground
or
something
afterwards,
which
would
be
unfortunate
on
a
friday
evening:
cool,
okay,
let's
take
a
break
here,
I'll
pause,
the
recording
and,
like
I
mentioned,
if
any
of
you
want
to
stick
around,
feel
free
to
do
so
otherwise
have
a
good
weekend
and
maybe
see
you
in
one
of
the
next
sessions.