►
From YouTube: CA2 SIG - IEEE Blockchain Governance Framework
Description
IEEE P2145 working group has been working on Blockchain Governance standards, to provide a common nomenclature and framework for blockchain governance across different use cases and contexts, including public, private, permissioned, permissionless, and hybrid solutions. The standards follow a modular approach for blockchain governance, recognizing that governance of blockchain solution involves governance of many different components and facets of the solution. The standard provides guidance for identifying the governance targets, and provides a consistent structure for governance design. The session will introduce the standard and discuss how the extensible framework can be applied for various aspects of CA2SIG projects, including ecosystem, technology solution and system lifecycle.
----
Hyperledger – Open Source Blockchain Technologies
Hyperledger is an open source community focused on developing a suite of stable frameworks, tools and libraries for enterprise-grade blockchain deployments.
It serves as a neutral home for various distributed ledger frameworks including Hyperledger Besu, Fabric, Sawtooth, Indy, as well as tools like Hyperledger Avalon, Cactus and libraries like Hyperledger Aries, Ursa. Learn more about Hyperledger projects: https://www.hyperledger.org/use
Discord: https://discord.gg/rVCn4j7UFd
Case Studies: https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/case-studies
Training & Certification: https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/training
Tutorials: https://www.hyperledger.org/use/tutorials
Webinars: https://www.hyperledger.org/learn/webinars
Events: https://www.hyperledger.org/events
Vendor Directory: https://www.hyperledger.org/use/vendor-directory
Subscribe to the Hyperledger Newsletter: https://www.hyperledger.org/newsletter
Follow-us on Twitter @Hyperledger
Learn about Hyperledger Membership: https://www.hyperledger.org/about/join
#Hyperledger #Blockchain
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
A
C
A
Okay,
all
right
so
I'll
hop
right
into
it.
I
wanted
to
make
a
couple
different
announcements.
We
do
have
a
couple
different
opportunities
to
participate.
There
are
Technical
and
non-technical
opportunities.
One
thing
that
I'm
looking
for
that
I
could
use
some
supporters
that
I'd
like
to
build
awareness
for
the
stick
next
year,
so
I'm
looking
for
kind
of
communications
and
engagement
officer
or
role
to
use
a
lot
of
the
content
that
we
have
a
lot
of
the
presentations.
A
We
have
one
programming,
call
that
every
like
it's
actually
I
have
to
go.
Look
at
it.
It's
on
the
counter
on
the
left-hand
side,
which
is
not
showing
on
my
screen,
but
we
have
programming
calls
where
people
with
some
of
the
different
kind
of
key
made
painters
are
getting
together.
Sharing
the
active
projects
that
are
being
built
in
hyperledger
Labs
there's
a
lot
of
activity
there
so
highly
recommend.
You
go
join
that
group
some
some
really
great
folks
there
working
on
some.
A
A
So
for
those
who
might
not
know,
we
have
a
net
admissions
profile
tracking
prototype
that
they
got
a
couple
different
Awards.
Last
year
we
are
focused
on
developing
a
solution
for
essentially
tracking
the
admissions
through
Supply
chains
go
one
two
and
three.
We
are
starting
way:
Upstream,
focusing
on
methane,
flaring
reduction,
so
tracking
that
and
then
using
the
information
to
be
able
to
essentially
Market
that
environmental
data
to
government
Regulators
and
also
the
marketplace
to
be
able
to
find
resources
to
decarbonize
that
supply
chain.
A
So
that's
the
big
picture
we've
been
having
some
really
good
conversations
with
some
oil
and
gas
producers
who
are
interested
in
through
running
prototypes
and
just
in
general
kind
of
working.
Through
all
the
contacts
we
met
at
cop27,
so
it's
a
really
good
momentum.
There.
We
also
have
a
couple.
Research
projects
objects,
one
with
a
graduate
student
from
the
University
of
Columbia
on
just
a
kind
of
a
market
analysis
of
the
existing
Solutions
or
the
feasibility
of
using
DLC
to
develop
this
supply
chain
problem
and
another
project.
A
That's
really
kind
of
focused
on
the
the
business
model,
the
economics
of
of
what
we're
describing
as
the
measurement
economy,
which
essentially
is
the
ability
to
unlock
different
levels
of
government
regulation.
Green
Finance
consumer
demand
to
work
in
a
concerted
effort
to
provide
a
value
proposition
for
corporations
to
to
want
to
decarbonize
the
supply
chains.
So
so
that's
what
we
have
with
the
carbon,
accounting
and
I
guess
the
research
working
group
Christian
did
you
want
to
share
anything
about
the
standards
work
and
then
any
progress
that
you
guys
have.
D
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you
Sherwood
just
to
say
we
are,
we
are
done
for
the
year.
I
think
we
have.
We
have
made
a
very
good
progress
thus
far
and
we
hope
to
to
give
it
a
little
bit
of
a
acceleration
in
January
again
so
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
for
making
their
contribution
and
yeah
I
think
we
have
a.
We
have
a
we
are.
We
are
building
on
the
ontology
that
we
have
that
we've
developed.
D
We
are
already
building
project
designs
and-
and
you
know,
based
on
that
on
that
on
on
those
inside
insights,
we
have
developed
there
and
we
hope
to
to
bring
in
some
some
people
in
January
to
to
you
know
from
I'm
I'm
bringing
some
people
into
my
office
just
to
to
to
accelerate
some
of
the
some
of
this
stuff
and
and
and
and
and
and
and
address
some
of
the
to-do's
that
we've
identified.
So
we
we
we
hope
to
to
have
a
big
year
next
year.
Thanks.
A
Okay,
you
must
be
away
okay,
great
so
with
that
I'd
like
to
I'm
very
excited
about
the
speaker
that
we
have
today,
I
had
the
fortunate
opportunity
to
catch
part
of
savita's
presentation
when
she
gave
it
to
the
toip
one
of
their
meetings.
I
think
it
was
Financial
objects,
working
group
meeting
and
I
was
just
really.
A
What
was
kind
of
impressed
upon
me
is:
is
her
ability
to
take
something
like
blockchain
governance
and
provide
a
framework
to
really
kind
of
look
at
blockchain
Solutions
and
understand
the
different
inflection
points
where
governance
is
is
needed.
So
Savita
is
the
chair
of
the
IEEE
p2145
of
blockchain
government
standards,
working
group,
so
she's
heavily
involved
in
kind
of
crafting
and
kind
of
developing
these
government
standards
so
and
she's
also
a
founder
of
stem
soft
Solutions,
which
I'm
sure
she
can
speak
to.
A
A
F
So
when
we
started
this
work
to
be
honest,
I
was
really
confused
like
when
we
use
that
term
blockchain
governance,
it
meant
different
things
for
different
constituents.
Different
stakeholders,
so
looking
at
it
from
the
Enterprises
in
Enterprises,
will
wanting
to
kind
of
create
a
blockchain
solution
or
making
a
decision
in
terms
of
whether
they
should
or
not
join
a
particular
blockchain
Network.
F
That
was
considered
as
a
governance
question
the
four
king
of
the
you
know:
blockchain
Network.
That
is
considered
as
a
governance
question
and
so
on
so
forth.
So
now
what
we
decided
is
to
get
to
the
basics
and
answer
these
three
basic
questions.
So
what
is
governance?
What
is
blockchain
and
then
we
can
talk
about
what
is
blockchain
governance
so
again,
going
to
the
definitions
of
governance.
F
Those
are
kind
of
key
elements
of
governance,
but
that
is
not
sufficient.
We
feel
that
who
makes
decisions,
who
is
impacted?
The
people
side
of
things
covers
that
aspect.
The
membership,
the
decision,
rights
and
so
on.
The
process
is
about
how
the
decisions
get
made,
the
coordination
among
stakeholders
or
the
parties
involved,
the
it
may
include
the
coordination
amongst
governing
members
or
coordination
with
the
community
and
so
on.
So
the
process
for
decision
making
the
policies,
what
are
the
actual
disease
decisions
that
are
made
again?
F
F
The
practice
talks
about
how
those
decisions
are
executed
or
implemented
and
forced
Etc
and
throughout
all
of
this
incentives
plays
a
big
role
and
again
the
word
incentives.
In
this
context,
we
are
using
to
mean
both
positive
and
negative
incentives,
and
it
is
not
incentives
as
in
tokenomics,
but
it
is
incentives
as
in
what
is
the
business
value
for
my
organization
or
if
there
are
regulatory
compliance
issues,
then
what?
If
I
don't
do
it
so
both
of
those
we
categorize
under
incentives?
The
positive
and
negative
incentives.
F
So
with
that
view
of
governance,
we
then
went
to
the
second
question:
what
is
blockchain
and
everyone
on
this
group
is
aware
of
the
the
core.
Blockchain
technology
provides
decentralized
and
distributed
Ledger.
It
is
cryptographically,
secure
Etc,
so
we
went
to
this
definition
of
blockchain
solution,
which
is
a
technical
solution.
A
software
Hardware
solution
that
utilizes
blockchain
technology.
So
in
this
particular
diagram,
the
bottom
two
layers
kind
of
provide
the
blockchain
technology
and
the
applications
are
built
on
top
of
blockchain
Technology.
F
So
this
is
a
very
simplistic
View.
Today
it's
there
are
multiple
intermediate
layers,
so
on
top
of
blockchain
Technology,
there
are
blockchain
platforms.
On
top
of
that,
there
could
be
application
platforms
and
applications
are
built
on
top
of
that
or
there
could
be
an
application
which
is
directly
used
using
blockchain
technology.
So
with
those
various
flavors
of
blockchain
Technology,
blockchain
Solutions,
each
one
of
them
is
successful
only
when
we
can
effectively
and
successfully
engage
multiple
stakeholders
in
the
community.
F
So
in
a
way
you
could
think
of
it,
as
that
is
the
technical
Network,
the
blockchain
network.
But
then
there
is
a
business
Network
which
is
critical
for
the
success
of
the
solution,
and
so
this
is
another
point,
though
it
is
kind
of
considered
in
every
blockchain
Solutions
it
is,
it
is
not
something
we
found
was
explicitly
identified
and
then
the
third
thing
is
so
sorry
before
that,
so
that
this
diagram,
this
is
from
the
world
economic
forums.
F
So
in
order
to
achieve
that,
the
the
collaboration
between
the
technology
and
business,
the
stakeholders-
it
is
critical,
so
we
have
identified
the
four
stages
of
blockchain
solution
life
cycle.
It
is
the
creation
of
the
blockchain
solution
itself,
where
stakeholder
alignment
is
needed
around
the
objectives,
the
vision,
the
business
strategy,
the
business
model,
Etc
the
operation
of
the
blockchain
solution,
where
you're
operating
the
blockchain
network
and
the
solution
on
top
of
it,
the
evolution.
F
This
is
where
the
changes
in
the
protocol
are
changes
due
to
regulations
may
occur,
and,
finally
retirement,
though
we
don't
talk
much
about
it
like
like
I,
say
that
in
Utopia,
new
world
blockchain
will
live
forever.
The
retirement
of
a
blockchain
solution
are
real
concern,
sense
and
Wendy.
Actually,
Wendy
Charles
is
also
part
of
p2145,
and
she
has
brought
the
group's
attention
to
this
particular
stage.
F
So
going
into
the
details
of
the
targets
of
governance,
though
these
are
the
highest
level
targets,
the
technology,
solution,
ecosystem
and
life
cycle.
They
can
be
further
subdivided
into
additional
targets.
Again,
keeping
in
mind
that,
for
whenever
you
need
direction
and
control,
we
need
to
have
governance,
so
the
direction
and
control
could
be
provided
at
the
highest
level
for
a
technology
solution
and
that
direction
and
control
may
may
include
each
of
these.
F
So
software
development
versus
business
strategy,
the
the
stakeholders
involved
that,
for
both
of
those
components,
are
different
stakeholders.
The
decision
making
may
be
different.
How
you
implement
the
decisions
may
be
different,
and
so
we
do
not
in
our
standards,
define
specific
targets
of
governance.
But
we
say
that
consider
these
three,
the
technology
solution,
ecosystem
and
life
cycle
at
highest
level
of
governance
targets
and
within
each
of
this,
depending
on
your
solution
and
what
is
critical
for
your
particular
use
case.
Define,
the
governance
targets.
F
We
ask
to
describe
the
blockchain
solution
under
consideration
and
it
would
include
things
such
as
the
business
use
case,
the
industry
sector,
the
type
of
solution
from
technology
perspective,
whether
it
is
a
blockchain
platform
or
is
it
an
application,
whether
it
is
a
scaling
solution,
Etc,
whether
it
uses
public,
private
or
hybrid
blockchain,
the
resources,
data
ownership
issues,
liability
issues
ETC?
So
basically,
the
overview
provides
input
for
identifying
in
order
to
govern
this
particular
solution.
F
What
in
turn,
we
need
to
provide
Direction
and
control
for
and
list
of
selected
blockchain
governance
targets
identifies
those
components
where
governance
is
needed
and
the
final
section
is
about
defining
governance
for
each
of
those
identified
targets
of
governance.
So,
for
each
targets
of
governance
we
do
identify
the
its
purpose,
the
context
within
which
it
lives
and
finally,
Define
the
governance
for
that,
including
the
people
process,
policy,
practice
and
incentives
elements.
F
So
that's
kind
of
whatever
work
is
on
the
p2145.
Now,
how
do
we
apply
it?
For
a
project
such
as
the
ca2
Sig
lab
the
driving
decarbonization
with
environmental
data,
so
by
the
way
sure
would
the
the
draft
that
you
shared
with
me.
The
group
has
done
wonderful
work,
so
I
want
to
acknowledge
that
we
have
already
identified
the
objectives
both
from
the
global
ecosystem
perspective
and
for
this
project.
F
However,
for
the
each
of
these
systems,
you
may
have
to
drill
down
and
identify
the
lower
levels
of
Targets
in
the
technology
area,
such
as
the
standardization
of
data
that
could
be
in
itself,
something
that
requires
difference,
governance
or
the
business
objectives
and
strategy
right
that
might
need
its
own
governance,
then,
coming
to
the
ecosystem,
again,
you've
identified
the
stakeholders.
The
question
is
how
these
stakeholders
would
be
organized.
F
You
have
identified
the
need
for
a
Dao
for
the
audit
contracts,
but
the
governance
of
Dao
itself
also
will
have
to
be
considered
and
and
similar
things.
So
it's
like
again
looking
at
your
project
and
identifying
the
targets
of
governance
would
be
that
first
step
and
then
applying
the
governance
model
would
be
that
next
step.
So
that's
what
my
presentation
is
and
I'm
open
for
any
questions.
A
Well,
thank
you
so
much
Savita,
I
I
was
so
glad
to
be
able
to
see
this
for
a
second
time,
because
it's
such
great
information
and
I
think
such
Clarity.
You
bring
to
the
you
know
the
challenge
of
of
governance
in
the
blockchain
environment
that
it
was
very
informative.
The
second
time
as
well
for
everybody
else
on
the
call
just
to
provide
a
little
bit
more
background
around
the
kind
of
the
last
part
of
savita's
presentation
and
Savita.
Would
you
mind
going
back
two
slides
just
so?
A
This
is
related
to
a
project
proposal
that
we're
working
on
in
Savita
is
graciously
offered
to
to
kind
of
be
be
a
part
of
kind
of
advising
on
this
project,
but
we're
working
on
submitting
a
project
proposal
for
consideration
by
the
the
TOC
within
hyperledger.
It's.
This
is
a
work
in
progress,
but
it's
built
around
this
idea
of
using
some
different
hyperledger
DLT
Solutions
to
essentially
create
climate
accounting
solution.
They
can,
in
the
upper
in
the
upper
right
hand,
part
of
the
screen
here.
A
E
A
So
this
emissions
data
management
system
is
a
it's
a
prototype,
that's
under
development
and
actually
the
kind
of
the
lead
I,
don't
know
what
I
call
you
for
trying
developer,
not
a
concept
guy.
The
the
driving
force
behind
this
project
is
it's
on
the
call
and
I
wanted
to
see.
If
you
wanted
to
kind
of
speak
to
it,
actually,
you
might
have
had
to
drop
off
yeah.
So
this
is.
This
is
active.
A
A
We
are
actively
engaged
with
some
different
pilot
Partners
to
to
work
on
getting
off
the
ground,
and
this
is
also
the
kind
of
the
core
part
of
our
our
project
proposal,
but
yeah.
If
you
are
interested
in
it,
please
reach
out
to
me
happy
to
chat
about
it,
but
this
is
definitely
a
yeah.
It's
kind
of
active
in
moving
forward
sure.
E
A
F
Yeah
so
so
again
like
on
this
particular
slide,
you
can
see
that
there
are
three
subsystems
that
have
been
identified.
The
data
management
system,
so
data
management
system
itself
would
need
governance
now
in
order
to
what
does
that
mean?
So
if
we
drill
down
into
data
management
system,
the
data
is
being
provided
by
multiple
stakeholders
and
it
needs
to
be
interoperable.
So
are
there
data
standards
going
going
to
be
developed
for
that?
F
So
that
is
one
of
the
considerations
so
consider
any
of
these
elements
so
data
standardization,
or
how
do
we
really
control
the
permissions
to
who
gets
access
to
what
data?
All
of
those
are
kind
of
governance,
questions
and
by
governance?
Questions
like
the
way
we
Define
it
is
that
governance
is
all
about
making
decisions
and
decisions
for
what
decisions
so
that
the
thing
that
you
are
developing
would
function
as
it
is
intended
to
so
data
pooling
Solutions.
F
There
is
some
objective,
so
governance
is
needed,
such
that
you
provide
Direction
and
control
in
order
to
achieve
that
objective,
and
so
we
kind
of
drill
down
on
both
the
sides,
what
needs
Direction
and
control
and
what
are
the
elements
of
governance?
So
elements
of
governance
include,
then,
who
is
a
decision
making
Authority
again?
The
word
Authority
is
strong,
but
it
can
be
decision
making
Authority
in
a
decentralized
model
too.
So
who
makes
the
decisions
about
the
data
pooling
Solutions?
F
What
process
do
they
follow
in
order
to
make
those
decisions?
How
do
they
communicate
the
decisions
to
all
involved
and
how
do
they
implement
it
and
through
all
of
this,
what
incentives
do
you
provide
for
the
parties
involved
such
that
they
are
going
to
make
the
right
decisions
aligned
with
the
objectives
of
the
data
pulling
solution?
So
that's
kind
of
is
the
approach
we
are
like
from
the
p2145
model.
That
is
the
approach
we
would
propose.
E
E
A
For
those
of
us
who
are
are
interested
in
learning
more
about
governance,
specifically
with
regards
to
the
work
with
IEEE,
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
how
we?
What
resources
there
are
that
come
out
of
that?
How
how
we
might
engage
and
whether
whether
there's
the
opportunity
to
bring
prototypes,
for
example,
some
people
they
call,
might
be
working
on
prototypes?
F
Absolutely,
and
in
fact
we
are
kind
of
finishing
the
kind
of
the
group
review
and
approvals,
hopefully
this
month,
and
then
it
will
go
through.
The
ipal
leaves
process
where
the
ballot
ballots
would
be
formed
and
public
comments
would
be
invited
Etc.
So,
while
that
path
is
going
on,
we
are
in
fact
working
on
some
prototypes
some
applications.
F
D
F
So
he's
working
on
reverse
Logistics
use
case
and
applying
this
model
for
that
particular
use
case.
There
are
some
other
a
couple
of
initiatives
also
going
on
right
now
in
early
stages,
but
we're
also
drilling
down
onto
into
specific
aspects
and
considerations
for
blockchain
governance,
which
need
to
be
considered
in
order
to
design
the
governance
and
it
can
go
into
further
details
in
terms
of
when
is
on
Chain
versus
off-chain,
blockchain
governance,
appropriate
and
so
on
so
forth.
But
that
is
a
supplementary
work
to
this
standard.
A
Great
and
in
developing
these
standards,
did
you
look?
Were
there
specific
exam,
like
with
your
approach?
Were
there
specific
examples
of
a
blockchain
standards
that
were
in
place
that
you
looked
at
to
kind
of
inform
your
approach
to
developing
the
standards?
Are
there?
Are
there
good
kind
of
use
cases
out
there
that
kind
of
stick
in
mind?
That
would
be
good
for
people
to
look
at,
because
standards
are
one
thing,
but
seeing
it
in
action
is
another.
F
So
we
did
take
this
meta
approach
compared
to
any
other
governance
standards
work
where
we
are
not
specifically
kind
of
identifying
that
you
need
to
do
this
or
this,
but
we
are
saying
that,
depending
on
your
use
case,
you
identify
what
needs
to
be
governed
and
consider
these
elements
of
governance.
So
in
that
sense
it
is
flexible,
it
can
be
applied
to
different
use
cases
and
so
on,
but
applying
the
standard
two
specific
use
case.
A
F
I
I
think
I
mean
it's,
it's
a
real
problem,
real
Challenge,
and
so
whoever
is
developing
a
blockchain
solution
needs
help
and
they
want
help
right
away
so
the
prescriptive
models,
if
you
could
say
that
do
this-
that
that
then
it
seems
easier
to
do,
but
governance
needs
real
understanding
of.
Why,
like?
Why
do
you
need
governance
in
the
first
place?
F
What
are
the
objectives,
and
what
we
are
proposing
is
really
that
deep
thinking
in
terms
of
why
do
you
really
need
it
and
then
considering
Who's
involved
and
how
it
would
work
to
meet
the
objectives?
So
I
think
that
I
know
that
in
our
standard
we
are
putting
a
lot
of
onus
on
the
users
of
the
standards
to
think
it
through,
but
we
are
providing
the
guidelines.
It's
it's
something
similar
to
ieee's
software
engineering
standards
right.
A
B
F
C
F
Right
right,
yeah,
absolutely
again,
the
the
standard
IEEE
standard
is
like
I
said
it
is
at
meta
level.
We
are
not
saying
that
you
need
to
govern
one
specific
thing
or
and
and
then
again
the
governance
consider
this
like.
That.
Is
this
the
context
within
which
a
blockchain
solution
sits
right.
So
there
is
it's
deployed
say
across
the
globe
versus
deployed
within
one
particular
jurisdiction.
F
We
consider
that
as
the
context
within
which
the
blockchain
solutions
sits,
so
the
work
is
focused
on
the
governance
for
the
blockchain
solution
and
that
governance
need
to
take
into
consideration
the
context
of
the
regulatory
requirements
for
the
Nations,
the
compliance
requirements
Etc.
So
in
a
way
we
are
not
dictating
anything
that
the
the
governments
are
doing,
but
whatever
are
the
regulations.
We
are
considering
that
as
input
for
defining
governance
for
the
solution,
I
don't
know
if
that
helps.
F
A
A
Is
there
kind
of
thought
given
to
the
Consortium
building
or
the
awareness
building
or
or
what
is
it
that
that
ensures
that
that
these
standards
are
used
that
that
you
know,
there's
this
kind
of
a
network
effect
that
people
using
them?
Can
you
can
you
share
a
little
bit
about
the
thinking
there
and
the
strategy.
F
F
We
are
working
on
and
we
feel
that
if
we
can
provide
some
use
cases
and
some
you
know
examples,
that's
what
what
would
be
useful
for
the
practitioners
and
and
even
the
question
that
Elizabeth
is
Raising.
It's
a
great
question
and
how
does
that
interaction
works?
That's
something
you
know.
Everyone
who
wants
to
create
such
solution
is
interested
in.
So
that's
something
would
become
clear
through
the
examples
through
that
we
create,
and
so
that
is
our
next
step,
but
in
the
meanwhile
we
would.
F
A
F
E
A
So
I'm
curious
to
hear
your
thoughts
on
the
commercial
environment
that
you
foresee
building
on
top,
even
though
they're
not
open
source,
but
is
there
there's
an
opportunity
for
like
different
commercial
stakeholders
to
participate
in
value
exchanges
that
are
not
IEEE
and
who
are
the
players?
And
what
does
that
look
like.
F
A
F
E
F
So
so
this
this
is
again
really
a
good
question,
so
I'm
also
part
of
trust
over
IP
and
participated
in
that.
So
the
trust
and
reputation
is
like
again
those
those
words
kind
of
go
kind
of
hand
in
hand,
but
coming
back
to
police
work,
we
say
that
okay,
who
is
governing
and
who
needs,
needs
to
abide
by
those
governing
those
decisions
that
the
governing
party
makes
so
in
that
particular
realm
who
is
governing
the
deputation
of
who
is
governing
becomes
important.
F
That
kind
of
gives
some
some
additional
trust
in
the
decisions
made,
because
when
you
are
told
that
do
eggs
even
in
in
a
family,
the
governance
of
the
family,
if
you
considered
If,
the
child
is
told
that
do
X
by
by
by
dad
versus
Mom,
and
if
the
mom,
let's
go.
If
you
don't
do
X,
you
will
have
certain
consequences
and
mom
never
follows
rumors.
His
dad
always
follows
through
so
there's
a
reputation
there
right
so
based
on
that
reputation.
What
is
the
impact
on
the
decision
making
processes
the
decisions
themselves?
F
A
Right
right,
so
this
this
last
question
from
me
is
because
well
I
work
for
in
Internet
governance
for
I
can.
This
is
also
for
Anna,
for
somebody
who's
really
interested
in
exploring
the
space
and
and
interested
in
potentially
participating
in
development
of
government
standards
and
just
kind
of
getting
up
getting
a
feel
for
for
what's
going
on
what
are
the
working
groups?
What
would
you
recommend
if
somebody
wants
to
get
involved
and
start
actively
engaging
and
participating.
F
F
A
Fantastic
okay,
there
she's,
both
DaVita,
has
posted
her
her
email
to
the
chat
and
I.
If
we
have
time
for
one
more
question,
otherwise,
I
was
going
to
wrap
this
with
a
couple
questions
open
to
the
to
the
Community
to
members
Savita,
do
you
want
to
stop
sharing
your
screen,
or
would
you
be
able
to
do
that.
A
A
For
me,
it
just
really
kind
of
helped
me
get
my
arms
around
the
the
kind
of
high
level
of
how
to
approach
a
governance
problem
and
and
I
think
that's
why
I
find
it
so
exciting,
especially
coming
from
the
internet
governance
world
of
I.
Can
I
can
tell
you
that
the
presentation
that
I
just
saw
that
you
gave
I
think
it's
a
lot
more
concise
than
a
lot
of
the
communication
that
I
think
in
the
internet
government
space.
A
I
wanted
to
I
wanted
to
wrap
this
up,
just
very
quickly
opening
the
floor
to
anybody
on
the
call
and
wanted
to
see
if
anybody
has
anything
that
they'd
like
to
share
as
far
as
upcoming
events
or
initiatives
or
speaking
opportunities
that
that
we
should
be
aware
of,
please
feel
free
to
share
and
potentially
any
items
for
upcoming
meetings
and,
and
so
even
speakers
that
you'd
like
like
us
to
have
so
I'll,
see
the
floor
to
the
group
to
see.
If
anybody
has
anything
to
share.
G
So
we
call
NetZero
protocol
and
we
we
are
currently
looking
at
verifying
emissions
using
satellite
data
and
we
we
started
as
a
part
of
the
chain
link
hackathon
and
now
we've
started
working
very
closely
with
EU
medsat
European
Space
Agency,
to
look
at
basically
the
data
validations
for
meeting
nitrogen
dioxide.
The
list
goes
on
and
on
so
it's
a
big
long
list
of
I.
Think
10
data
sets
that
we're
currently
working
with
just
trying
to
understand.
G
You
know,
probably
from
environmental
scientists
out
there
who
can
help
is
validate
some
of
the
algorithms
that
we
are
currently
working
on
and
also
our
finality
of
emission
reporting
would
utilize
a
hyperledger
solution
and
we're
trying
to
see
the
last
Bridge.
We
we
always
think
that
blockchain
is
a
finality
layer,
so
we
want
to
see
how
we
can
engage
with
the
hyperledger
community
and
move.
The
proposal
forward
appreciate
any
help
around
this
and
happy
to
either
share
more
in
this
session
or
in
in
a
separate
session
But.
A
Yes,
absolutely
so,
first
welcome
I'm
very
excited
to
have
you
here.
It
sounds
like
you're
doing
some
really
interesting
work
and
I'd
love
to
learn
more
I.
Think
with
the
given
time
we
have.
The
best
thing
would
be
for
you
to
reach
out
to
my
email,
I,
just
posted
it
in
the
chat
and
I
can
connect
you
with
some
different
members
within
the
Sig
that
I
think
could
kind
of
help
Usher
that
conversation
forward,
brilliant
okay,
but
yeah
Kathy.
A
Thank
you
for
joining,
looking
forward
to
learning
more
and
kind
of
exploring
how
to
kind
of
integrate
you
and
connect
with
some
different
folks
within
the
ecosystem.
Alex
posted
that
hedera
has
an
ecosystem
week.
This
week,
they're
very
active
in
the
sustainability
space.
Highly
recommend
that
thank
you
for
flagging.
A
I
will
definitely
check
that
out.
Elizabeth
said
that
there
is
a
carbon
offset
retirement
log
for
retail,
carbon
credits
and
green
tokens
that
are
not
Securities
carbon
trading
standards
such
as
mine.
She
has
a
link
there
for
people
to
check
out
thanks
again
Alex
for
the
the
ecosystem
week.
That
sounds
fascinating.
A
A
Attempt
I
believe
I
believe
it's
the
10th,
but
definitely
double
check
to
make
sure
that
I
have
it
right
on
the
calendar
and
yeah.
Looking
forward
to
meeting
you
all
again
next
year,
I
will
send
out
a
an
email
to
everybody
to
let
you
know
about
the
agenda
and
the
focus
of
the
meeting,
and
thank
you
all
for
joining
in.
In
particular.