►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello,
everybody
and
welcome
to
the
team
growth
and
ich
weekly
status
meeting
today
is
Tuesday
the
20th
of
June,
so
our
Odyssey
to
finish
the
Jason
or
PC
methods
continues
last
week
was
probably
a
bit
of
a
slow
week.
We
had
we
had
quite
a
few
holidays,
but
we
still
managed
to
make
make
some
some
progress.
A
B
B
B
C
B
First,
you
see
method
that
we
can
use
to.
Our
city's
methods
is
the
EPA
to
get
lots,
but
it
takes
as
the
parameter
is
the
filter
object
and
we
can
use
to
filter
out.
Only
the
events
will
actually
be
logs.
That
we
are
interested
in
I
will
just
tell
it
to
get
the
events
from
that
single
contract
that
I
just
created,
and
we
should
be
able
to
get
the
free
logs
that
will
created
when
executing
the
two
methods
so
decide
specified
address.
B
Let's
find
the
exact
topic.
We
can
also
specify
an
empty
array
or
just
a
null,
which
means
that
any
topic
should
match
this
predicate,
and
you
can
also
specify
the
or
operator
let's
say
I
want
the
logs
with
either
this
or
this
topic,
which
should
return
all
the
Lots.
It
was
just
two
topics
that
I
have
so
if
this,
if
this
event
had
more
than
one
topic,
I,
could
also
specify
them
in
the
next
field
in
the
other.
A
B
Okay,
so
the
first
topic
I
think,
is
the
name
or
some
kind
of
heart
of
the
filter
on
the
VM.
These
are
just
the
topics
and
actually
solidity
that
gives
us.
This
is
hush.
I
think
the
first
problem
is
with
the
kind
of
event
specifier
and
the
other
topics
are
the
parameters,
but
only
the
parameters
that
are
marked
as
index
are
included
in
the
topic.
So
if
I
change
the
contract
so
that
the
address
field
is
not
indexed,
this
bidder
field
will
become
a
field
in
the
topic
other
than
that
remaining
fields.
B
A
B
Well,
it
doesn't
give
you,
but
you
can
check
them
in
compiled
code
yeah.
Maybe
there
is
some
kind
of
switch
or
parameter
that
you
can
list
them,
but
I'm
not
sure
about
that,
and
also
when
using
what
free
API
you
can
just
use
the
event
object
and
and
don't
have
to
worry
about
what
is
the
heart
of
the
topic.
B
A
B
To
start
at
a
particular
blog,
for
example,
in
most
cases
you
know:
where
did
you
deploy
your
contract?
And
so
we
can
just
start
from
that
blog,
because
you
are
sure
that
there
are
no
events
before
and
maybe
you
can
in
some
cases
specify
the
target
blog.
But
it's
not
always
possible
so
so,
and
I
can
also
show
that,
if
actually
words
I
project,
look
for
this
one
and
each
dollar
you
can
do
unlock,
because
the
other
two
are
two
file.
B
B
For
the
filters
is
the
new
filter
method
and
it's
used
to
actually
register
a
filter
on
on
the
node.
I
will
get
the
same
filter
maybe
have
to
specify
any
topic
inside
to
the
address,
and
let's
wait
for
the
light
is
not
blocked
and
what
it
returns
is.
The
idea
of
the
filter
that
has
just
been
created-
and
there
are
two
more
methods
that
we
can
use
to
get
data
from
the
filter.
One
of
them
is
get
user
logs,
which
should
behave,
behave
same
way
as
the
ETH
get
logs.
B
The
only
difference
between
those
methods
is
that
with
ETH
get
logs,
you
have
to
send
the
whole
theater
object.
Every
time
you
request
and
with
new
filter
usually
disturb
the
filter
ones,
and
you
can
just
get
the
logs
by
the
filter
ID.
So
this
should
give
you
the
same
result,
but
the
other
kind
of
more
interesting
and
I
think
more
useful
method
with
the
great
filter
changes
which
is
used
to
get
only
the
logs
that
appeared
since
you
recently
asked
for
them.
B
B
At
least
some
time
to
mine,
I
now
ask
for
changes.
It
returns
me
only
the
log
that
was
created
and
if
we
use
the
th
get
logs,
it
should
still
return
all
the
logs
well,
I
should
specify
the
Lakers
Rock
gives
all
the
logs
and
also
the
address
field,
for
example,
is
optional.
You
don't
have
to
specify
the
address,
and
in
such
case,
if
you
return
all
the
logs
that
match
these
topics
from
all
the
addresses
and
I
have
used
this
contract
before.
So
you
can
see
with
a
bunch
of
logs
here.
B
A
B
B
Since
my
recent
query,
we
can
see
that
blog
blogs,
new
blogs,
created
all
the
time
if
I
stop
the
miner
for
a
while,
it
won't
return
any
new
blocks
and
the
last
method
is
the
pending
transaction
filter.
It's
similar
to
your
blog's
filter,
it's,
but
it
seems
to
get
the
transactions
from
the
pending
transactions
queue.
So,
if
I
create
such
a
filter
and
get
the
changes
of
it,
it
returns
nothing
because
there
are
no
pending
transactions.
B
A
B
Are
transactions
that
you
have
sent
and
by
you
I
mean
from
these,
are
the
transactions
that
were
sent
from
any
address
that
is
managed
by
this
note.
So
if
you
execute
ETH
list
accounts
or
personnel,
these
accounts
and
you
sent
a
transaction
from
any
of
these
accounts,
this
transaction
will
be
returned
in
the
new
pending
transaction
filter.
B
B
A
Okay,
great
and
then
there's
a
there's,
a
couple
more
and
then
hopefully
will
be
they'll,
be
a
bit
of
testing
I
know:
we've
we've
already
started
some
testing,
there's
a
bit
of
testing
on
the
RPC
stuff
and
I
think
we're
so
we're
we're
quite
close
at
this
stage.
Right
Adam
you,
you
finished
one
AD
during
the
week,
which
M
that
would
say
the
get
transaction
hash
right.
C
Yes,
so
it
is
similar
to
get
a
transaction
by
hash,
but
instead
of
returning
the
transaction
you
are
returning
received
for
that
for
this
transaction.
And
additionally,
if
the
transaction
is
creating
a
contract,
then
you
have
to
also
calculate
and
return
contract
address
with
this
received
response
and
it
receives
con
zipped
contains
analogs.
It
is
also
included
in
the
response,
so
it
is
still
in
code
review.
C
A
A
This
week
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
I
guess:
work
done
on
reviewing
the
various
POS
and
get
another
other
adjacent
methods
through
ICM,
Alan
and
Nico
have
joined
us
despite
the
fact
that
I
believe
there's
a
holiday
in
in
Argentina,
so
I
don't
know
how
we
should
feel
about
that,
but
thanks
for
stopping
by
and
okay,
so
that
is
I.
Think
roughly
is
we're
still
as
I
say
last
week
was
a
little
bit
light
in
terms
of
we
had.
We
had
quite
a
few
days
off,
there's
a
few
days
office.
A
Suppose
it's
because
it's
June-
and
we
should
probably
expect
that
so
we're
inching
closer.
We
expect
to
see
at
least
seven
of
these
Jason
or
PC
guys
get
merged.
I,
think
that
would
be
pretty
much
all
of
them.
So
then,
we'll
have
to
go
and
do
some
some
testing
on,
missed
and
and
just
and
check
ourselves
gets
to
get
get
some
integration
testing
going
up
and
that'll
be
that
okay,
I
think
that
does
anyone
else
have
anything
to
add.
Or
will
we
finish
up.