►
From YouTube: Docs SIG 2020 07 24
Description
Jenkins documentation special interest group July 24, 2020 with summary data from the last month of documentation development plus a question and answer session on techniques the Jenkins project uses to manage documentation development, documentation issues, and software issues.
A
Hi
welcome
to
the
jenkins
documentation
special
interest
group
meeting.
It's
the
24th
of
july
2020..
Today.
We've
got
several
topics:
let's
go
through
those
I'm
going
to
start
sharing
my
screen
and
we'll
take
a
look
at
the
topics
and
work
through
them.
A
So
we're
going
to
review
review
the
agenda
today
report
on
previous
action
items.
I
have
the
action
item
to
create
the
docsig
blog
post
to
highlight
our
current
progress.
A
That
effort
will
not
happen
until
after
we
get
started
on
google
season
of
docs,
but
it
is
in
progress
and
being
given
some
thought
grateful
to
those
who
are
attending
our
doc's
office
hours.
We
had
four
who
attended
office
hours
on
monday
of
last
week
and
three
who
attended
yesterday
on
thursday,
we're
willing
to
change
those
hours
as
needed.
Grateful
to
have
people
helping
in
terms
of
the
terminology
updates
terminology
voting
is
in
progress
and
on
the
terminology
proposal
chain,
changing
master
to
something
more
appropriate.
A
We're
also
delighted
that
google
season
of
docs
we've
received
a
number
of
very
effective
proposals
for
projects.
Those
projects
will
be
reviewed
and
the
reviews
will
be
submitted
to
google
by
july
31st
and
after
the
july
31st
submission
it'll
be
about
two
weeks
and
then
submitters
will
be
notified
of
their
of
the
project
results.
A
Xena
great
to
have
you
with
us.
I
was
just
working
through
the
agenda
last
item
on
the
agenda
and
then
maybe
we
can
ask
if
you
have
questions.
A
A
A
That
shows
that
someone
has
begun
the
process
of
looking
at
it,
and
we
like
this
one
to
be
under
one
day
and
what
the
data
shows
is
that
the
median
value
is
well
under
one
day
and
has
been
well
under
one
day
for
for
many
months.
So
that's
a
good
sign
time
from
pr
open
to
merge
is
not
quite
as
attractive
in
that
it's
showing
we've
got
an
increase
of
time
to
merge
going
from
what
used
to
be
roughly
two
days,
pushing
more
towards
taking
us
up
to
four
days
to
get
pull
requests
merged.
A
A
A
A
B
So
the
question
also
is
for
the
user
pages
that
are
currently
on
wiki
that
are
currently
in
migration
process.
B
The
issues
on
github
do
they
cover
all
pages
on
the
wiki
or
one
has
to
go
to
the
wiki
check
the
page
find
out
which
one
is
not
yet
on
jenkins,
dot,
io
and
my
migrate
or
you
just
go
through
the
issues
and
pick
up
one
issue
that
states
okay.
This
is
for
migrating,
for
instance,
like
remote
access
api.
There
was
an
issue
created
for
that.
So
my
question
here
is
issues
created
for
all
pages
on
wiki
or
just
some
of
them.
A
That
is
required
before
we
decide.
A
We
decide
where
to
place
a
wiki
page
in
the
jenkins.ios
infrastructure
in
the
jenkins.io
site
and
which
content
should
be
migrated
and
which
should
not
so
very
good
question.
A
So,
let's,
let's
take
an
example,
there
is
a
triage
spreadsheet,
striat
sheet
that
mark
uses
that
I've
used
to
record,
which
pages
have
been
triaged,
which
pages
have
been
reviewed,
and
so
we
could
take
a
look
at
that
now.
Let's
see
if
I
can
find
that
really
quickly,.
A
C
A
Yes,
this
is
it
good,
okay,
so
I'll
embed
a
link
to
this
sheet
into
the
meeting
notes
you
know
so
that
we've
got
it
so
here's
the
triage
sheet
and
what
I
do
there
is
when
I've
reviewed
a
page
and
created
a
github
issue
for
it.
I
make
an
entry
in
this
sheet
and
the
reason
I
do
that
is
this
access
count
column
here.
A
Maybe
we
should
make
this
sheet
a
little
more
readable
there.
This
access
count
is
an
accid
a
count
of
number
of
times.
The
pages
page
was
accessed
in
a
90-day
period,
and
so
what
we
did
is
we
intentionally
said:
let's
migrate,
first,
the
pages
that
are
most
frequently
accessed
and
let
other
pages
wait.
A
And
so,
if
we
look
here,
you
can
see,
for
example,
that
pages
like
how
to
run
jmeter
at
row.
72
is
in
that
90
day
sample
period
was
only
accessed
4
000
times.
Now,
that's
still
lots
of
accesses.
So
it's
interesting,
but
it
doesn't
yet
have
a
github
issue,
so
someone
would
need
to
triage
it
all
the
the
others
above
it
have.
A
So
as
an
example,
if
we
go
to
issues
here
and
if
I
click
the
new
issue
button
wiki
migration
here
is,
is
it
provides
a
template
of
the
kinds
of
information?
We
need
to
begin
a
wiki
migration
project
process
and
it
will
ask
which
page
are
you
migrating?
Where
should
it?
Where
should
it
go?
What
are
the
notes
that
should
be
added
about
migration
and
then
put
additional
comments
there?
A
What
we've
found,
particularly
as
we
get
further
along
in
this
wiki
conversion
process,
is
that
there
are
some
pages
that
require
quite
a
lot
of
work.
Other
pages
that
should
just
be
discarded,
other
pages
that
are
are
of
a
portion
of
the
page
is
useful,
but
the
entire
page
is
not
useful,
as
is
we
have
to
make
significant
changes
to
make
it
useful.
A
B
Yes,
it
did
so
well,
I
think,
while
I
was
working
on
the
proxy
documentation,
I
I
think
I
saw
another
sheet,
I'm
not
sure
if
it
is
this
with
pages
like
this
old
school,
I
think
that
had
progress
or
something
if
it
had
been
merged
or
it
had
a
progress
column
to
show
if
it
had
been
matched
and
all
that.
So
I
was
looking
for
a
page,
an
issue,
a
github
issue
to
work
on.
I
noticed
that
there
are
some
issues
where
you
have
someone.
Okay,
I
want
to
work
on
this.
B
I
want
to
work
on
this,
the
same
person,
probably
on
like
five
six
seven
issues.
I
want
to
work
on
it.
I
want
to
work.
The
person
had
indicated
interest,
but
I
don't
see
any
pull
requests
or
any
work
associated
to
that
issue
ongoing
already.
So
is
there
a
wait
like
probably
okay,
one
for
one
person?
B
I
believe
at
a
particular
point
you
shouldn't
like
indicate
interest
or
more
than
two
three
issues
at
once
when
you're
done
with
that
you
can
move
on
to
others,
so
other
people
can
also
have
you
know
the
opportunity
of
working,
because
when
I
see
an
issue-
and
I
see
someone
has
already
indicated
an
interest-
I
wouldn't
want
so
there
won't
be
any
conflict.
But
in
a
situation
where
I've
seen
one
person
indicating
interest
on
like
10
different
issues
at
once
and
work
has
not
started
on
the
issue.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
Okay,
this
one,
I
think,
was
one
that
it
had
an
assignee
and
the
assignee
said.
Oh
hey
I'd
like
to
take
this
on,
and
this
was
my
response,
but
notice
that
kumar
harsh
is
not
assigned
here,
so
it
could
be
assigned,
but
then
again
someone
else
could
pick
it
up.
This
was
just
an
I
finally
got
to
answer
this
question.
C
A
Now
you
you
did
mention-
and
this
is
a
good
page
for
us
to
to
to
note
the
plug-in
micro
migration
progress
report
page
is
a
great
place
to
go.
If
you're
thinking,
I
want
to
migrate,
plug-in
documentation,
but
I
think
you
were
specifically
interested
in
wiki
pages
that
are
not
plug-in
specific,
but
rather
our
general
purpose.
Documentation
from
the
wiki
is
that
correct.
A
A
Page,
which
is
one
good
link,
and
then
there
is
also
the
plug-in
document-
the
plug-in
migration
documentation
page
that
guides
how
to
do
that.
There's
the
exporter
here
that
can
help
with
the.
D
A
A
Then
there
is
also
a
github
project
that
we
use
to
track
progress
on
that,
and
now
I
I'll
have
to
think
about
where
that
github
project
is
because
plug-in
docs
progress.
I
think
nope,
that's
not
it
docs
this
one
here
it
is
so
this
is
a
a
github
project
which
tracks
the
tries
to
track
the
various
pull
requests
through
their
stages
in
progress
merged
and
released.
A
B
Yeah,
finally,
when
I
was
going
through
the
resources
before
I
started,
contributing
I
saw
a
template
issue
on
jira
for
migrating
pages
is
jira?
Is
the
jira
issue
still
in
use,
because
I'm
trying
to
understand
the
link
between
github
issues
and
issues
on
jira
also
actually
created
one
issue
for
the
plug-in
page,
I'm
currently
migrating,
but
I
just
wanted
to
be
sure
if
that
is
still
very
much
active.
A
Good
question
all
right,
and
so
there
are
two
answers
to
it.
The
and
the
two
answers
jira
is
the
the
most
common
track:
bug
tracking
system
for
four
plugins
right,
plugins
and
jenkins.
Core
we've
switched.
A
The
jenkins.io
site
from
jira
to
github
issues,
and,
and
so
there
are
still
issues
in
jira
that
are
related
to
jenkins
dot
io,
but
we
found
for
the
the
documentation
purposes,
it's
easier
for
us
to
do.
Jenkins.I
o
work
in
github
issues.
We
get
more
involved
people,
they
better
understand
how
to
use
it,
etc.
A
B
So,
just
to
be
sure
for
english.
I
o
tub
is
the
primary
source
for
issues,
but
for
plugins
jira
is
still
in
use.