►
From YouTube: 2023 04 27 Jenkins GSoC Office Hourse
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
So
where
are
we
standing
right
now?
The
mentors
did
a
lot
of
work
in
grade
in
grading
and
ranking
older
proposals
and
projects
builds
the
project
teams
and
doing
a
lot
of
discussions
because
it
was
this
year.
It
was
particularly
difficult
to
choose
so
we
had
over-
let's
say:
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
disclose
it,
but
over
60
proposals,
so
huge
amounts,
a
good
proportion
of
very
good
ones
and
the
only
limited
resources.
So
we
had
to
choose
and
it
was
not
easy
at
all.
We
have
a
choice.
A
We
have
our
list
of
projects
and
mentors
that
were
submitting
to
Google
in
a
particular
order.
We
say
these
are
the
projects
we
can
Mentor
this
year.
Please
support
and
sponsor
these
projects
and
they're
going
to
decide
if
there
is
enough
money
for
all
the
proposals
for
that
I'm
crossing
fingers.
I
think
that
all
projects
that
we
submitted
will
be
accepted
by
Google,
but
this
is
an
unknown
as
we're
getting
into
another
crisis
but
turbulent
times
in
some
of
our
industry
right
now.
A
The
deadline
for
the
last
tweaks
is
it's
1800
UTC
today
then
it's
closed
and
then
mentors
can
rest
for
a
week
until
the
announcement
of
next
week.
A
So
that
will
be
in
the
middle
of
the
night
for
India
and
Asia,
so
you
will
learn
it
in
the
middle
or
you
will
learn
it
in
the
morning
or
if
you
want
to
stay
late,
because
you're
too
curious
we're
welcome
the
day
after
that,
on
Friday
usual
time,
we
will
hold
the
office
hour
where
we
will
cheer
the
selected
people
the
winners
and
we
will
discuss
and
and
see
and
give
advice
to
the
people
that
were
selected
but
also
advise
and
follow
up
to
the
people
to
the
people
that
didn't
make
it
this
year
so
and
a
lot
of
very
good
work.
A
My
curiosity
won't,
let
me
sleep,
says
harsh
well.
I
I
can
share
that
feeling.
We
can
share
that.
So
this
is
the
news
from
from
this
side,
so
we're
in
a
middle.
Nothing
really
strong
to
share
or
to
work,
just
need
waiting.
I
know
it's
nail
biting
stress
for
for
the
people
on
the
the
selection
apart,
but
this
is
how
it
goes
so.
Other
questions
comments
or
things
I
hope
that
arsh
will
not
miss
his
sleep
for
one
week
now.
B
I
think
we
we
can
thanks
all
the
all
the
upon
all
the
contribution
and
the
proposal
we
got.
It
was
very
difficult
to
choose.
It
was
very
interesting
to
read
the
proposal
and
so
and
I
think
we
we
can
say
we
recognize
that
a
lot
of
them.
A
lot
of
people
put
a
lot
of
work
in
in
those
proposals
and
that
we
appreciate
that
that
was
our
job
was
hard,
but
we
do
recognize
the
the
work
that
have
been
done
and
it
it
was
hard
work,
but
rewarding
for.
A
A
C
A
C
A
So
your
question
is
no
I'm
I'm,
not
sure
I
understood
it
correctly.
So
if
you
are,
if
you
are
selected
or
if
you
are
not
selected
selected.
C
And
with
discussion
with
my
mentor
that,
like
I,
came
up
with
an
amazing
ride-on
and
then
can
I
Implement.
That
idea
like
that
is
not
mentioned
in
my
proposal
or
do
I
have
to
go
through
that
proposal
of
responding.
A
One
danger
is
that
you
try
to
embrace
too
much
is
that
you
widen
the
scope
of
what
you're
trying
to
do
far
to
and
and
that
you
will
not
end
correctly
so,
and
this
is
during
the
bonding
period
that
this
will
happen
when
the
project
teams,
the
the
contributor,
will
work
together
to
finalize
the
project
plans
and
the
project
plan
is
saying
we're
going
to
start
with
that
feature
with
this
epic.
A
With
this
this
feature,
and
so
you
you
put
Milestones
one
after
the
other
and
also
going
to
do
that,
and
if
we
reach
that,
then
we
have
that
additional
stretch
goal.
All
these
things
are
are
are
open.
It's
the
The
Proposal
is
not
a
contract,
it's
a
base.
It's
a
starting
point.
B
No
I,
I
think
I
I.
Think
the
the
proposal
is
like
a
good
plan.
It
it
doesn't
survive
the
first
activity
yeah
you,
you
have
it's
larger
than
open
source,
it's
probably
the
same
for
in
companies
working
and
so
on
and
again,
if
you
mention
that,
with
your
with
the
mentor
and
and
or
with
the
team
of
mentors-
and
everyone
agrees,
that
was
that's
a
good
idea.
Let's
go
for
it.
There's
no,
no
need
it's
not
yeah,
it's
not
a
strict
plan.
B
The
proposal
is
just
for
us
to
see
what
you
understood
of
the
project
and
what
you
want,
what
you
see
Evolution
or
what
you
need,
what
needs
to
be
done
for
the
project,
but
not
the
strike
plan
yeah.
A
C
Good
when
the
like
topic
that
I
wanted
to
discuss
like
there
was
an
issue
of
like
plagiarism
one
time.
So
what
do
we
consider
previously
in
open
source
like
in
the
g-soc?
There
is
mentioned,
like
plaguism
of
code
like
what
can
be
copied
and
what
cannot
be
copied.
What
is
considered
as
criticism.
A
A
Building
so
the
principle
of
Open
Source
is
that
you,
the
expression,
is
you're
building
on
the
shoulders
of
giants
of
the
people
that
were
before
people
that
are
working
together
with
you,
and
this
can
only
be
done
by
sharing
ideas,
make
them
grow
and
build
on
them.
A
What
is
important
like
in
science
is
that
you
do
a
correct
attribution
and
say
this
idea
comes
from
that
person.
This
part
of
code
I
copied
I,
improved
it
or
extended
it
with
this,
and
this
and
this
so
you
absolutely
need
to
be
respectful
to
other
people's
work
exactly
in
the
same
way
same
way
as
you
want
other
people
to
respect
your
work,
so
don't
do
to
others
what
you
wouldn't
like
others
to
do
to
you.
A
So
it's
a
plagiarism
is
something
that's
that's
used
only
in
in
a
competition.
Okay,
gsoc
has
a
competition
part
and
because
only
a
limited
numbers
will
be
selected,
but
working
with
the
ideas
of
others
is
an
a
very
important
part
of
Open
Source
and
sharing
ideas
and
and
making
them
grow.
This
is
a
critical
value
of
Open
Source,
so
we
cannot
use
plagiarism
in
this
in
this
scope
am
I
clear
with
what
I
I
try
to
explain
or.
C
So
like,
if
I
like,
take
a
piece
of
code
from
sapper
flow,
so
like
I
should
like
said
that
I
took
that
from
here
in
comment
or
like
in
the
pr
I
am
raising
or
what
should
be
the
optimal
approach
for
that
to
win.
A
Right
in
the
in
the
comments,
unless
it's
it's
super
trivial,
but
if
you
find
an
algorithm
or
a
neat
trick,
just
add
it
as
a
comment
and
say
this
these
following
lines
or
the
principle
of
this
method.
C
A
Well
yeah:
this
is
this
is
why
it's
a
very
different
from
this:
the
scholars
purely
School,
a
procedure
or
or
a
way
of
working
in
the
scientific,
World
research.
A
There
are
other
rules
that
that
need
to
be
to
be
followed
and
in
open
source.
It's
even
another.
Another
interpretation
Chris,
you
wanted
to
say
something.
D
Yeah,
so
it
also
depends
on
which
school
you
go
to
is
like
normally
in
the
west.
It
is
always
slightly
discussed
at
the
beginning
of
the
program,
but
it
it
has
taught
in
Hong
Kong
to
in
most
universities,
but
in
China
I'm,
not
sure
and
India
I'm,
not
sure.
A
I
I
know
that
these
kind
of
things
are
so
plagiarism
is
considered,
cheating
in
many
schools,
because
they're
expecting
that
you
do
all
the
work
yourself
because
you're
learning
and
then
you
need
to
start
doing
your
first
research
a
paper,
but
there
you
cannot
invent
everything.
You
read
other
people's
Theory,
other
people's
techniques
or
it
depends
on
what
field
you
are
and
you
need
to
be
taught
how
you
handle
that
an
open
source
is
something
completely
different
because
having
the
ideas,
flow
in
exchange
and
moving
very
rapidly
behind
is
important.
A
There
is
an
important
competition
being
first
being
successful,
with
the
idea
being
able
to
put
the
idea
further.
This
is
also
an
important
element.
A
C
So,
if
I
like
use
that
and
to
like
create
a
piece
of
code
like
so
will
that
be
considered
a
plagiarism
like
it
is
inside
the
source.
It
says
that
it
has
created
that
code
from
scratch
and
it
is
inside
that
inside
the
source
from
which,
like
it,
has
used
to
generate
that
code.
So
what
will
be?
What
should
I
do
if,
like
I'm
using
charge,
repeat
reconsider
case
like
I'm,
using
charge
Equity
to
like
help
me
and.
A
Now
yeah:
well,
we
need
we
need
to
to
put
the
the
scope
correctly
and
we
we
are
running
out
of
time
there,
the
scope
of
what
is
plagiarism
and
how
and
so-
and
we
had
an
interesting
start
of
discussion
last
week
about
artificial
intelligence,
one
of
the
biggest.
A
How
can
I
say
that
a
culprit
I
think
is
the
correct
English
word
or
dangers
with
chat
GPT?
Is
that
it's
so
assertive,
and
it
looks
good
that
you
turn
off
your
own
intelligence
and
are
not
critical
and
say
in
in
saying
this.
This
will
work.
This
is
bug
free.
A
A
People
can
trick
it
to
make
you
and
assert
things
that
are
just
stupidity,
I'm,
I'm
off
from
the
history
background
and
I've,
seen
statements
that
and
I
could
spot
where
it
was
created
on
Wikipedia
and
and
this
Cupid's
it
was
about
women's
rights
related
to
the
end
of
the
first
world
war.
So
something
but
this
assertion
exploded
on
the
webs
and
people
were
were
just
re-quoting
it
with
chat
GPT.
A
You
will
just
have
that
by
the
power
of
a
thousand
that
and
and
so
it
it
it
will
help
at
one
time,
but
you
absolutely
need
to
be
critical,
and-
and
this
is,
why
use
your
brain?
Don't
trust
it?
It's
a
helper
can
give
you
good
tips
as
trusting
everything
that
you
find
on
Google
or
you
find
on
the
internet.
A
C
Yes,
I
I
agree
with
that,
like
like
it
wrote
a
piece
of
food
that
was
completely
illogical,
so
I
can
agree
with
that,
but
it
can
help
and
people
people
have
also
tricked
like
treated
to
do
certain
things,
which
should
not
be
possible
like
saying
for
certain
race
or
say
certain
things
which
is
like
wrong,
and
people
are
expected
to
do
so.
I
think
like
charge,
it
is
like,
but
what
about
plagiarism
like?
What
about
the
code?
It
is
writing
if.
A
If
it's
well
anyway,
chat
GPT
is
one
of
the
the
problems
behind
it.
It
uses
sources
on
the
internet.
It
learns
from
it.
I
should
quote
where
he
he
learned
it,
how
it's
done,
but
it's
hidden
behind
that.
So
you
don't
know
where
it's
its
knowledge
is
coming
from.
But
if
you
yourself,
you
use
information
produced
by
chat,
GPT,
but
just
attribute
it
and
say
this
code
has
been
generated
by
check
GPT
on
that
date.
A
With
these
parameters
or
these
data-
or
this
is
not
coming
from
from
me-
it
comes
from
Chachi,
BT
and
and
like
it's
a
hearsay,
so
it's
it's
now
making
people
believe
that
you
created
that,
while
it's
coming
from
from
this
type
of
engine,
this
is
not
plagiarism.
This
is
cheating
and
and
you'll
have
once
it's
it.
A
People
find
it
out
that
in
fact,
you
you
make
believe
that
you
can
do
all
these
things
and
that
in
fact,
you
can't
or
that
your
your
impersonating
something
else
once
people
find
that
out,
you're
out
of
the
game.
So
the
benefits
that
you
get
from
it
is
very
dangerous
and
limited.
C
But
the
reason
of
cycling,
something
is
that
if,
in
future
it
is
found
wrong
or
if
in
future
it
is
found
like
that
something
was
where
was
it
taken
from
or
like
what
was
the
thought
process
on,
creating
that
or
how
it
was
produced?
The
purpose
of
citing,
like,
in
my
opinion,
so
every
site
like
it,
was
produced
by
charge
equity.
C
Then
how
many?
How
will
we
come
to
the
conclusion
that
like
how
it
was
created
or
something
like
that
that
how
it
was
generated
or
other
information
being
might
find
is
like
say
it
was
cited
from
cited
from
staple
flow
like?
If
not
if
it
is
a
citation
stack
of
flow
like
then,
we
will
know
that
for
sale.
What
question
lead
to
this
and
what
decision
was
there?
What
discussion
went
there,
so
we
might
get
some
more
information
regarding
that,
like.
C
C
Like
the
person
who
copied
was
like
took
it
from
the
question
itself
and
not
the
solution,
so
that
generated
an
error
here
and
from
that
sighting.
We
can
like
understand
that
what
happened
but.
D
C
Free
site
charge
Equity
like
we
might
not
see
that
so
like
what's
the
Thought
on
this.
A
Yeah
here
this
is
a
very
wide
question
and
and
very
interesting
one
to
conclude.
The
discussion
here
in
this
forum
just
be
aware
that
gbt
does
not
have
the
correct
level
of
quality.
A
A
And
has
dangers
in
it
that
are
that
made
me,
but
here
I'm
an
old
man
so
but
I've
also
seen
a
lot
of
things.
B
If
I
may
just
add
a
comment
on
that,
I
think
if,
if
you
ask
the
good,
if
you
have
the
correct,
you
ask
the
correct
questions
to
any
EI
AI,
you
might
have
somewhat
a
correct
answer
or
almost
correct
answer
code,
but
at
least
on
on
other
subjects.
But
if
you
stop
the
code
that
was
generated-
and
you
don't
say
it,
we
might
not
see
it
out
of
the
box.
We
might
not,
because
everyone
codes
differently.
B
Ai
won't
help
you
there,
because
it
can't
at
the
day
we
are
speaking
it
can't,
and
this
is
where
we
will
anyone
with
a
bit
of
experience
in
it
will
see
that
you
didn't
understood
the
code
that
you
claim
to
be.
Yours
said
the
problem
is
not
using
codes
coming
from
elsewhere
because,
like
a
teacher
told
me
like
a
decade
ago,
we
are
not
really
creating
new
code.
B
We
are
just
creating
new
glue
between
pieces
of
code
and
when
you,
when,
if
you
don't,
if
you
claim
a
piece
of
code
to
be
yours
when
it's
not
your
credibility
on
your
next
submission,
won't
exist
and
it
will
harm
you
more
than
the
benefit
of
claiming.
That
is
your.
It
was
your
code
and
personally
I.
Don't
have
any
problem
saying
seeing
a
piece
of
code
not
coming
from
your
mind.
B
If
you
understand
it,
if
you
are
able
to
tweak
it,
if
you
are
able
to
modify
it
to
to
to
suit
your
needs
or
suit
the
needs
of
the
feature
you're
trying
to
code
or
to
fix
the
test,
you're
trying
to
fix
and
all
that
I'm
fine
I'm
fine
with
that.
But
if
you're
not-
and
you
claim
it,
your
code-
I
want
personally
I
want.
D
B
It's
a
personal,
it's
a
personal
feet,
but
yeah
I
personally,
don't
have
any
objection
on
code
coming
from
AI
or
any
answers
coming
from
AI
as
long
as
it's
correct
and
you
understand
it
as
soon
as
one
of
those
two
requisite
are
not
met,
then
I
do
have
a
big
problem
with
it.
That's
all
yeah.
A
Very
good
here
this
is
an
interesting
subject-
is
already
the
second
time
that
it's
comes
up
and
an
interesting
one.
I
suggest
that
we
stop
at
this
stage.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
people
for
the
questions.
Thank
you
for
the
the
comments
I.
Thank
you
all
for
your
patience
and
hard
work
for
submitting
the
proposals
for
reviewing
them
and
we're
now,
in
the
last
stretch
for
the
for
this
selection.
So
all
the
goods
and
I
hope
that
harsh
will
sleep
enough,
while
waiting
for
the
results.
D
A
Okay,
let's
conclude:
let's
finish
here:
we'll
meet
again
next
week
on
Friday,
where
we
will
congratulate
the
people
that
are
selected
and
discuss
with
the
people
that
were
not
selected
and
see
how
we'll
how
we'll
move
forward.