►
From YouTube: Kankakee County Board Meeting 7/14/2020
Description
Kankakee County Board Meeting 7/14/2020 9:00 AM
A
B
B
B
C
E
E
I
A
A
L
L
The
request
for
special
use
should
be
denied,
and
there's
several
reasons
for
that,
but
in
the
record,
before
the
zoning
board,
which
I'm
sure
you've
seen
also
and
I'll,
be
very
brief
for
about
approximately
10
years,
this
property
has
been
used
in
this
industrial
cement,
crushing
facility
by
the
petitioner.
You
know
make
no
mistake
about
it:
the
property
is
for
very
high,
intense
industrial
use,
but
in
an
agricultural
district
now
my
review
of
the
records
the
public
records
outside
the
zoning
board
of
appeals.
L
The
vote,
the
zoning
board
of
appeals
vote.
It
really
should
have
been
unanimously
in
denial
of
the
petition
for
a
special
use
permit.
It
is
clear,
based
on
the
testimony
both
the
petitioner
and
the
public
at
the
public
hearing,
that
there
are
about
150
trucks,
semi-trailer
trucks,
large
vehicles
entering
and
exiting
this
property
at
a
minimum
when
the
trucks
come
and
go
on
weekends.
L
I
know
that
was
a
big
contentious
issue
before
the
zoning
board.
The
petitioner
uses
front
loaders
tractors
to
dump
the
cement
into
trailers
and
dump
trucks
again
constant
noise
and
dust,
the
crushing
of
the
material
that
there's
aside
from
the
truck
traffic,
kicking
up
dust.
The
the
dust
that
is
created
by
the
crushing
of
the
material
is
ending
up
on
neighbors
homes
in
their
pools
on
their
on
their
fences
on
their
cars.
L
L
So
therefore,
the
petitioner's
petition
for
a
special
use
permit
should
not
have
been
granted
for
two
reasons.
First,
the
petitioner
provided
really
no
evidence
at
the
zoning
board
of
appeals.
Hearing
that
the
property
and
the
requested
high
impact,
the
industrial
use
can
meet
the
standards
for
the
issuance
of
a
special
use.
Permit
there's
no
evidence
of
it.
L
The
evidence
is
to
the
contrary,
it
actually
reveals
unequivocally.
We
think
that
the
standards
of
the
issuance
of
special
use
permit
cannot
be
met
for
the
following
reasons:
first,
as
required,
the
petitioner
had
to
show
that
the
establishment,
maintenance
or
operation
of
the
special
use
will
not
be
detrimental
to
or
endanger
the
public,
health,
safety,
morals,
comfort
or
general
welfare,
and
as
we,
if
is
indicated
in
my
comments
a
few
minutes
ago,
you
know
to
the
contrary.
L
The
the
all
of
the
adjacent
property
owners
testified
about
the
weekly
parade
of
the
150
trucks,
the
dust
that
was
kicked
up,
the
dust
created
by
the
crushing
of
the
materials,
the
smoke,
the
noise,
the
vibrations
again.
These
folks
bought
property
in
agricultural
country
style
atmosphere
and
also
the
fact
that
the
roadway
is
being
torn
up.
L
They
cannot
meet
the
first
requirement,
which
again
is
a
requirement
under
the
kankakee
county
zoning
ordinance
two,
the
special
use,
will
not
be
injurious
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
the
other
property
in
the
immediate
vicinity,
and
you
know
for
the
purposes
of
what's
already
permitted.
That's
standard
set
forth
again
in
the
county,
zoning
board
ordinance
or
the
likes.
I'm
sorry,
the
zoning
ordinance
that
that's
required,
the
petitioner
had
to
prove
that
it
would
not
be
injurious
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
the
properties
in
the
immediate
vicinity.
L
Given
this
proposed
special
use
by
the
petitioner,
the
adequate
utilities,
access,
roads,
drainage
or
necessary
facilities
have
or
will
be
provided
again.
That's
a
requirement
the
petitioner
had
to
show
he
did
not
there's
no
evidence.
There
was
a
lot
of
talk
about
how
the
epa
passed
on
this
or
did
not
pass
on
this.
That
was
something
the
petitioner
could
have
shown,
but
did
not
show,
there's
evidence
of
the
build
up
of
the
property
filling
in
the
property,
creating
flooding
and
water
on
the
other
adjacent
properties.
L
But
there
should
be
some
restrictions
placed
on
the
use
of
the
property
hours
of
operation,
some
type
of
landscaping,
some
type
of
fencing,
some
some
type
of
real
noise
abatement
for
the
vibration
and
the
rock
crushing
cement,
crushing
that's
going
on
the
property.
So
in
all
I
thank
you
for
your
time.
However,
the
negative
I
just
want
to
close
by
saying
the
negative
impact
on
these
adjacent
properties
are
so
great
that
the
the
county
board
respectfully
should
deny
the
request
for
a
special
use
permit
by
this
property
owner,
and
I
say
thank
you.
A
A
K
A
K
K
K
My
client
has
filed
an
application
to
receive
a
special
use
permit
allowed
under
the
property's
a1
zoning,
to
enable
him
to
recycle
materials
brought
to
him.
He
is
not
looking
for
any
variances,
as
incorrectly
stated
by
a
previous
commenter,
despite
certain
opponents
of
my
client,
claiming
he
is
seeking
to
do
otherwise.
As
just
noted,
he
is
not
rezoning
the
property
from
a1.
He
is
only
looking
for
permission
under
the
already
identified
special
uses
under
a1
to
conduct
his
business.
K
One
is
an
auto
body
shop,
the
other
apparently
fabricates,
storage
tanks
for
a
variety
of
purposes,
as
you
may
learn,
or
already
be
aware,
the
property
my
client
is
trying
to
operate
his
business
on
for
years
before
he
owned.
It
was
previously
used
for
purposes
that
are
no
longer
permitted
on
the
property.
Many
in
the
area
recall
this
period
and
have
apparently
confused
that
time
with
what
my
client
hopes
is
a
new
chapter
for
the
property's
history.
K
My
client,
after
opening
his
business
and
working
with
the
iepa
and
epa
learned,
he
should
ensure
his
business
should
be
zoned
properly
and
undertook
this
process
with
the
desire
to
ensure
he
legally
operates
his
business
during
this
time.
His
work
to
be
a
good
neighbor
by
attempting
attempting
to
remedy
neighbor
concerns
and
issues
along
the
way
which
many
of
you,
if
you
have
spoken
with
the
people
surrounding
this
property,
may
already
be
aware.
K
While
my
client
has
acknowledged
his
mistakes
along
the
way
during
this
process,
these
mistakes
are
a
far
cry
from
many
false
accusations
and
baseless
claims
made
by
some
to
prevent
him
from
obtaining
this
permit.
Moreover,
my
client
is
looking
to
comply
with
all
laws,
both
county
state
and
federal,
to
ensure
he
is
able
to
continue
this
business.
He
hopes
and
believes
this
is
an
opportunity
for
people
to
operate
businesses
lawfully.
That
may
have
been
under
the
incorrect
belief
about
what
they
may
and
may
not
do
on
their
land.
K
As
I'm
sure
you
are
all
aware,
one
of
the
main
goals
of
any
legal
process
should
be
compliance
and
not
just
punishment.
Reviewing
the
facts
here.
My
client
hopes
the
board's
fees
and
determines
the
benefits
outweigh
the
cost
for
approving
my
client's
special
use
permit
so
that
others
operating
businesses
outside
the
law
will
look
to
coming
from
the
shadows
and
into
compliance
as
well.
K
My
clap,
my
client
continues
to
work
hard
to
ensure
he
minimally
intrudes
upon
his
neighbors,
while
working
at
his
business.
This
is
evidenced
by
the
conditions
he
is
volunteered
to
place
on
himself
to
obtain
this
permit.
Nevertheless,
as
you
listen
to
concerns
raised
by
neighbors,
please
remember
to
focus
on
the
claims
made
and
the
facts
and
evidence
that
do
not
support
these
claims.
K
K
The
facts
which
you
will
find
in
the
record
that
include
letters
from
the
road
commissioner
and
fire
department,
which
also
repeat
what
a
previous
caller
claims
about.
The
road
issues
in
this
case
should
be
closely
scrutinized
to
come
to
the
conclusion
that
my
client
wants
to
operate
a
legally
permissible
business
under
the
zoning
ordinances,
with
conditions
to
ensure
he
has
not
offended
and
does
not
offend
his
neighbors.
K
M
A
N
Hi,
okay,
basically,
I've
never
done
anything
like
this
before,
and
so
I
bear
with
me.
I
am
I
own
the
property
at
152,
south
5000
west
road,
which
is
immediately
north
of
ronald
connor's
property.
I
bought
the
property
in
1999
and
built
a
barn
and
built
a
home
here.
I
love
this
property
because
it
was
beautiful
with
trees,
and
it
reminded
me
of
where
I
was
from
in
western
new
york,
my
hometown
of
2000
people,
and
I
just
love
that
that
I
call
it
my
sanctuary.
N
There
eventually-
and
I
was
like
that's
great-
that's
wonderful,
ron's,
a
nice
guy-
I
thought
that'll
be
a
great
neighbor.
Things
progressed
differently
than
that,
and
he
started
dumping
on
that
property,
digging
giant
holes
and
dumping
ground
dumping.
I
guess
road
waste
into
those
things
and
building
that
property
up
over
the
years.
N
N
N
I
know
I
know
this
property
well
and
I
know
what
goes
on
the
last
two
years.
I've
noticed
in
my
pool
there's
a
constant.
I
would
call
it
silt,
maybe
and
every
day
that
I
clean
the
pool.
This
gray
silt
is
on
the
bottom
of
the
pool
and
I
literally
can
never
get
it
all
up,
and
so
there's
a
constant
level
of
that
from
the
dust
that
comes
from
next
door,
and
I
just
feel
that
you
know
this
is
not
was
not
how
I
intended
this
property
to
be.
N
N
N
N
You
know
in
that
kind
of
thing,
and
just
the
dust
that's
created
and
the
sound
pollution
and
the
flooding.
Those
are
my
those
are
my
biggest
concerns
with,
what's
happening
next
door
to
me
right
now
and,
like
I
said
when
I
bought
it,
I
thought
I
was
zone
diagonal
side,
so
I
thought
it
would
kind
of
be
a
little
safe
and
that's
that's
not
what's
happened,
you
know,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
the
board
going
forward
we'll
take
that
into
consideration.
N
N
I
really
have
to
say
I
I
just
you
know
I.
I
just
hope
that
we
can
see
some
changes
or
at
least
some
modifications
so
that
you
know
there
there
are
there's,
not
trucks,
running
constantly
and
there's
not
dust
constantly
and
the
and
the
flooding
has
been
just
it's
changed.
What
I
can
do
with
what
my
downtime
is.
I
can
no
longer
ride
out
back
around
where
the
pond
was
because
it's
constantly
flooded
and
even
my
lawn
mowers
said
a
few
weeks
ago.
N
They're,
like
they
can't
get
the
lawn
mowed
in
certain
areas,
they're
like
it's,
never
I've
had
the
same
kid
mow
my
lawn
for
10
years
and
he's
like.
I
have
never
been
not
being
able
to
get
in
this
corner
in
10
years
and
he
can't
get
into
one
corner
because
it's
wet
constantly,
and
you
know
in
that
it's
just
it's
just
a
frustrating
situation
and
I
think
that's
all.
I
really
have
to
say.
A
H
H
H
H
N
C
M
O
O
Thank
you,
hello.
My
name
is
ron
o'connor
and
I'm
calling
in
about
the
special
use
permit,
I'm
applying
for
in
the
limestone
township
on
vance
hiding
road.
First
of
all,
I
would
like
the
county
board
members
to
all
know
that
I
initiated
this
process
of
this
permit
with
the
county.
They
did
not
approach
me
nor
have
they
issued
any
citations
or
violations
and,
to
my
knowledge,
have
not
had
a
caller
complaint
about
my
business
on
this
property
that
I've
owned
since
2006..
O
Those
calls
all
started.
Coming
in
after
I
sent
out
the
registered
letters
required
by
the
county
to
start
the
special
use
process,
there
are
eight
property
owners
that
touch
one
of
my
lot
lines
on
the
35
acre
parcel.
Each
of
those
eight
received
a
certified
letter,
informing
them
of
my
application
with
the
county.
O
I
was
told
that
there
was
a
petition
against
my
business
that
was
emailed
to
each
board
member
at
the
last
pga
meeting
last
month.
This
document
had
eight
I'm
sorry.
This
document
had
28
names
on
it
and
out
of
the
eight
immediate
neighbors,
only
three
of
the
households
were
on
it.
The
other
five
households
wanted
to
stay
neutral
and
the
other
names
that
are
on
that
petition
are
from
areas
like
piper
city,
chatsworth,
bourbonnais,
other
areas
of
limestone
and
of
bonfield.
O
As
I
stated
on
the
call
to
the
pza
last
month,
I
have
had
no
I've
had
many
unannounced
visits
from
the
illinois
epa,
the
kankakee
county
health
department,
the
kankakee
soil
and
water,
the
army
corps
of
engineers,
buckeye
pipeline,
the
state
police,
the
county,
sheriff's
police,
the
limestone
fire
department
and
the
limestone
road.
Commissioner.
P
O
Violation,
not
one
ticket,
not
one
fine.
There
are
notarized
letters
from
the
limestone
fire
chief
and
the
limestone
road
commissioner
clarifying
the
false
claims
that
pertain
to
them.
There
are
also
approval
letters
and
permits
from
the
illinois
epa
in
the
kankakee,
soil
and
water.
All
of
this
information
is
in
the
zba
transcripts.
O
O
However,
they
were
fined
multiple
times
and
by
a
few
of
them,
so
it
was
their
choice
to
stop
using
the
property
as
a
dump
and
to
sell
it.
I
have
cleaned
the
property
up
of
all
the
protruding
rebar
in
the
large
slabs
of
concrete,
the
I-beams,
the
tires
I've
leveled
portions
of
it
out
that
had
huge
holes
planted
grass
planted
trees,
I've
cut
waterways
and
parts
of
it,
I've
tiled
parts
of
it.
I
formed
a
retention
area
along
the
north
property
line
and
I've
installed
a
400-foot
asphalt
driveway
at
the
entrance.
O
O
I
have
made
huge
improvements,
not
just
to
my
property
but
neighboring
properties
as
well,
and
I
plan
on
continuing
to
improve
the
area.
I
realize
that
dust
and
noise
from
driving
on
the
gravel
portion
of
the
road
that
is
on
my
property
is
the
largest
complaint
from
the
neighbors.
I
plan
on
installing
more
asphalt
further
back
on
the
half
mile
long
lane.
This
will
solve
the
road
dust
problem
and
greatly
soften
the
vehicle
noise.
O
O
O
A
C
E
F
I
E
I
H
E
H
Q
E
H
H
J
B
R
M
P
Okay,
well,
let's
put
it
this
way
in
the
pca
meetings.
We
asked
the
board:
when
did
they
take
the
concern
for
health
and
safety
of
the
citizens
into
account
for
their
decisions,
and
they
told
us
they
don't
take
into
account
any
citizens,
health,
safety
and
well-being
in
their
decisions,
and
what
we
need
to
know
is
who
in
government
that's
allowing
this
to
happen,
is
accountable
to
this
point.
We've
had
none
and
because
of
forms
being
filled
out
incorrectly.
P
P
P
P
P
I
feel
it's
critical
that
he
be
held
to
that,
because
if
he
was
honest
and
filled
out
the
form
correctly,
it
would
state
that
he
has
to
do
numerous
pollution
control
projects
to
allow
this
to
happen
in
the
illinois.
Epa
is
part
of
that
and
they
give
it
a
sighting
and
they
give
it
a
thumbs
up
or
a
no.
P
P
P
P
P
P
Let
the
state
do
the
process,
let
them
go
through
the
citing
process.
Let
them
have
it
monitored.
Do
it
the
right
way
and
if
it
passes
great,
that
means
he's
clearing
the
air
up
and
we
can
breathe
it
the
way
this
is
going,
he
has
had
to
do
nothing
he's
claiming
he
has
permits.
He
has
none.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
he
has
a
violation
from
the
illinois
epa
he's
not
telling
us
what
it
is.
I
would
like
to
know
what
it
is.
A
D
E
F
E
A
A
D
A
S
Q
H
E
H
D
M
M
N
Johannes
favi
is
a
man
who
shared
his
story
on
may
13
2020,
with
the
u.s
house
of
representatives
committee
on
the
judiciary
subcommittee
on
immigration
and
citizenship
during
its
democratic
virtual
roundtable
on
ice's
response
to
covin.
So
that's
where
I
got
these
words,
and
this
is
in
his
words
quote.
My
name
is
johannes
fabi.
I
live
in
indianapolis
with
my
wife
and
our
children.
N
I
was
detained
there
for
almost
one
year,
while
my
wife
and
I
waited
for
the
government
to
process
the
petition
she
filed
for
my
green
card.
While
I
was
detained,
my
wife
gave
birth
to
our
second
child
and
our
family
lost
our
home.
I
met
our
new
baby
in
a
picture
by
mail.
I
saw
a
man
who
was
detained
with
me,
hang
himself
who
tried
to
commit
suicide.
N
That
case
is
the
only
time
I
have
ever
been
arrested
and
I
paid
a
heavy
price
when
I
accepted
a
plea
bargain
and
spent
months
in
jail.
However,
because
of
that
old
conviction,
I
was
in
immigration,
detention
for
nearly
a
year
with
no
bond
hearing
and
without
the
possibility
to
see
the
sun
or
breathe
fresh
air.
I
spent
the
night
I
spent
night
after
night
thinking
about
it,
and
I
read
about
the
law
in
the
library
and
I
came
to
understand
why
I
was
disqualified
from
bond.
It
is
wrong.
N
N
N
So
I
know
there
are
stories
like
this
and
more
of
ice,
locking
people
up
without
legal
representation
for
simply
not
having
the
right
kind
of
papers
at
the
right
time
lost
an
immigration
limbo
thrown
in
a
cell
ice
has
become
more
and
more
aggressive
over
the
years.
So
recently,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
picked
up
on
this,
but
they
just
announced
a
citizen
academy
in
which
citizens
assist
us
in
apprehending
people.
N
So
I
just
can
you
imagine
what
this
will
mean?
I
don't
want
my
county
shaking
hands
with
ice.
I
don't
want
my
county
making
money
from
imprisoning
immigrants.
This
relationship
with
ice
is
voluntary.
It
is
optional
and
we
can
get
out
of
it.
So
I'm
asking
you
the
board
to
be
just
way
more
curious
about
this
than
you
ever
have
been
before.
Can
you
please,
let's
ask
more
questions
and
not
just
to
the
sheriff
ask
what
effects
does
this
relationship
with
ice
have
on
our
own
communities
of
color?
N
H
T
T
The
relationship
between
the
sheriff's
office
and
ice
is
inhumane
and
it
hinders
our
community
in
many
different
ways,
we're
making
money
off
of
detaining
innocent
people
and
that
money
is
given
right
back
to
the
police
department.
45
percent
of
our
county's
annual
budget
is
used
on
law
enforcement.
T
T
The
goal
here
is
not
is
to
end
the
relationship
with
ice
in
kankakee
county
and
it's
to
demilitarize
the
nation
and
to
give
back
to
our
community
with
the
funds
that
we
can
gain
for
our
communities
from
defunding
the
police,
and
we
can
fight
poverty
and
homelessness,
which
are
factors
that
contribute
to
crimes.
We
can
focus
on
the
mental
health
of
people
in
our
communities
and
we
could
provide
better
education
opportunities
and
establish
youth
services,
which
we
lack
highly
here.
A
lot
of
our
youth
are
being
forgotten
about
and
that's
something
that's
unacceptable.
T
We
can
also
diversify
the
police
force
and
introduce
cultural
awareness.
There
aren't
very
many
diverse
officers
throughout
the
county
of
king
city
and
also
I'm
forcing
my
support
for
the
county-wide
initiative
for
the
eight
can't
wait:
police
reform
principles.
I
know
the
naacp
is
meeting
about
this
with
different
police
committees,
but
I
think
it's
important
that
the
county
board
gets
behind
that
initiative
as
well.
T
There
are
many
things
going
on
here
with
our
relationships
with
ice
that
just
hinder
our
community
completely,
and
a
lot
of
us
activists
here
in
the
community
are
going
to
continue
to
fight
for
that
relationship.
As
you
guys
heard
a
story
earlier.
There
are
many
other
stories
regarding
innocent
people
and
people
who
actually
give
to
our
communities
and
are
successful
business
owners
that
we
are
locking
away
and
profiting
off
of
so
I
hope
that
you
guys
can
think
about
this
and
educate
yourself
about
these
numbers
they're.
T
A
U
Oh
okay,
thank
you
good
morning,
county
board
members.
My
name
is
leslie.
I
am
21
and
I
am
a
dreamer
otherwise
known
as
a
doc
recipient.
I
immigrated
here
at
the
age
of
two.
Besides
my
parents
wanting
a
better
life
for
me.
They
were
encouraged
to
come
to
this
country
because
of
the
demands
for
cheap
labor
like
many
other
immigrants
and
now
they're
being
punished
for
it.
At
two
years
old.
I've
experienced
extreme
hunger
and
poverty,
but
don't
get
me
wrong.
U
U
The
federal
government
argues
that
they
are
entitled
to
less
human
rights
than
the
rest
of
us,
and
that
is
unacceptable.
It's
punitive
and
inhumane.
Our
immigration
system
is
over
100
years
old
and
we're
seeing
families
being
separated.
Children
are
going
missing
and
worst
of
all,
they're
being
sexually
abused.
U
U
U
U
I've
turned
my
ear
into
action
and
I
would
personally
not
stop
applying
pressure
until
we
start
seeing
some
change
here
in
kankakee.
If
that
means
that
I
have
to
encourage
people
not
to
vote
for
your
re-election,
I
will.
That
is
a
promise
again.
It
is
not
my
intention
to
assign
any
of
you,
but
I
will
not
apologize
for
speaking
up.
U
D
A
E
F
Q
E
D
D
F
R
W
W
S
X
If
I
might
take
a
point
of
personal
privilege,
let
me
just
thank
everybody
who
has
shown
up
here
today
and
thank
god
we
did
not
jerry,
don't
leave
yet
because
I
want
to
thank
you.
You
got
me
in
this
ball
game,
but
I
I
just
I'm
really
glad
that
they
didn't
put
this
appointment
at
the
bottom
of
the
agendas.
X
So
you
know,
thank
god,
we
don't
have
any
other
public
comments,
but
let
me
just
say
thank
you
very
much
for
being
here
taking
time
out
of
your
busy
schedules.
I'd
like
to
thank
the
county
board
members
for
affirming
me
also
judge
drew
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
time
out
of
your
busy
schedule
to
be
here
additionally,
jerry
setteth,
who
is
the
democratic
county
chairman,
along
with
senator
joyce,
as
well
as
sam
payton
and
and
commissioner
robert
snipes,
and
all
along
with
the
chairman.
X
I
guess
kind
of
pushed
me
to
taking
this
position,
because
I
was
looking
for
some
other
folks
and
I
was
I
was
turned
down
and,
and
the
senator
says
a
perfect
fit
hunter,
so
you
might
as
well
take
it.
So
you
know
people
have
some
concerns.
As
to
how
I
got
here,
look
at
jerry
and
the
senator
and
the
other
folks
that
I
I
just
mentioned,
but
I
look
forward
to
filling
the
shoes
of
george
washington.
X
Those
are
big
shoes,
but
I
do
bring
a
wealth
of
experience
and
public
service
having
served
on
the
kanke
city
council
for
40
years
and
having
worked
for
the
state
of
illinois
for
39
years
too,
and
you
have
some
you
know
rock
stars
here
already
that
I've
been
working
with
on
in
in
county
government
when
you
think
in
terms
of
sheriff
downey
worked
with
him
as
well
too
stace
tourney.
Everybody
knows
jim
rowe.
I've
worked
with
him
as
well,
too.
Also
bob
gessner.
X
The
corner
worked
with
him
for
a
long
time
dating
back
to
the
city
of
kankakee,
another
rock
star,
lori
gadboys,
your
recorder,
and
I
I
say
rock
stars
because
they
provide
wonderful
services
to
the
people
of
of
kankakee
county
in
excess
of
a
hundred
thousand
people
also
have
worked
with
dan
hendrickson,
your
county
clerk
for
many
years
as
well
too,
he's
been
in
that
particular
office
for
some
time
and
when
he
was
not
elected
county
clerk.
I
worked
with
him
as
well,
too.
X
I
have
a
relationship
with
the
treasure
and
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
jake
lee,
but
all
of
you-
I
I
just
really
like
to
just
thank
you
again
for
having
the
faith
in
me
and
and
all
of
you
who've
shown
up
here
early
this
morning.
I
appreciate
it.
You
have
interfaced
with
me
and
all
facets
of
my
of
my
life
and
political
career.
Some
of
you.
X
I've
grew
up
with
and
work
with
in
in
various
things
and
capacities,
and-
and
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody
again-
the
chairman
of
the
board
is
has
been
really
diligent
in
terms
of
providing
me
with
an
orientation
and
expediting
the
paperwork
and
and
giving
me
some
information
as
to
what
some
of
the
roles
and
responsibilities
would
be.
But
anyway
again,
I
just
want
to
thank
everybody.
X
A
Since
we've
been
dealing
with
covid,
we
haven't
had
people
in
person,
we've
been
saving
these
and
since
they
won't
be
in
person
for
a
little
while
for
all
of
these
department
heads
and
their
employees,
I'm
going
to
read
a
rather
lengthy
list,
and
these
all
these
folks
have
received
the
finest
certificate
of
appreciation
that
money
could
buy
via
interoffice
mail.
So
we
appreciate
all
their
service.
First
up
is
sheriff
mike
downey
35
years
with
the
county
grace
segabruck
30
years
in
the
probation
department.
A
Thank
you
both
for
your
long
long,
lasting
service,
25
years
sheriff's
department,
eric
davis
and
teresa
lainey
probation
department,
christine
yonke
and
tom
latham,
the
planning
department,
michelle
sadler
and
circuit
clerk
office,
paula
spalding,
all
of
those
are
25
years.
Congratulations!
20
years
we
have
in
the
sheriff's
department,
andrew
bastian,
scott
allen,
grant
van
vorst
and
craig
horstmann
in
corrections,
amanda
a
apel,
apel
misty
bright,
and
I
apologize
amanda,
I'm
sure
I'll,
hear
about
that
later.
A
A
A
E
D
D
E
H
Q
U
J
F
F
A
A
A
Session,
I
believe
everybody
is
still
present,
inviting
some
people
back
into
the
meeting
that
were
outside
of
it
we're
waiting.
The
next
thing
on
the
agenda
is
a
presentation
from
the
state's
attorney's
office,
and
once
we
get
nancy
and
jim
in
here,
they
have
some
things
that
they
wanted
to
talk
about
regarding
oma
and
things
like
that.
So.
B
A
D
M
A
E
D
H
H
H
F
A
E
S
H
H
H
D
D
R
R
A
A
Y
Y
Excuse
me
so
part
of
the
concern
has
been
the
bailey
case.
You
know
that's.
When
representative
bailey
filed
the
lawsuit
down
in
clay
county
illinois,
which
is
in
the
fourth
judicial
circuit,
we
are
in
the
21st
judicial
circuit.
So
there
is
some
question
as
to
whether
or
not
that
order
actually
applies
here
has
jurisdiction
over
us,
because
we
are
in
a
different
jurisdiction.
Y
There
is
some
uncertainty,
though,
that
is
true,
because
once
again
it's
in
a
different
judicial
circuit
than
we
are
so,
while
it's
not
binding
on
us,
it
could
have
some
persuasion
on
our
courts
here.
What
else
lends
to
the
confusion
is
just
that
morning
the
federal
court
had
cited
with
pritzker
and
said
that
he
was
within
his
rights
that
he
did
not
exceed
his
authority
with
his
executive
orders
when
they
were
deciding
about
whether
or
not
to
allow
certain
amounts
of
people
to
gather.
Y
Y
So,
no
matter,
if
we
look
at
the
governor's
executive
orders
or
we
look
at
idph
which
looks
at
the
cdc
they
they
are
saying,
we
should
wear
masks
if
we
can't
socially
distance
in
public.
So
you
know
the
cdc
recommends
wearing
face
coverings
or
masks
when
we,
when
you
can't
social
distance
and
then
idph
on
june,
26
of
20
is
the
last
time
they
updated
their
website.
Y
Y
So
you
can
require
to
do
masks,
wear
masks
here
and
you
can
do
temperature
screens,
because
that
is
a
screening
and
when
you're
doing
a
screening
you
can't
be
discriminatory.
So,
for
example,
I'm
of
asian
descent
and
since
you
know,
there's
some-
you
know
the
coved
that
you
know
originated
in
china,
you
can't
say:
oh
she's
asian.
Obviously
we
have
to
screen
her
because
that's
discriminatory,
so
it's
easier
just
to
screen
everybody
as
they
come
into
the
building.
Y
As
we've
stated
before
there
we
are
not
prosecuting,
there's
no
criminal
charges,
there's
no
mechanism
for
criminal
charges
or
fines
for
not
wearing
a
mask.
However,
if
people
would
enter
the
building,
they'd
be
asked
to
be
a
mask,
wear
a
mask
and
they
would
raise
become
like
a
destructive
like
destroy
property
or
refuse
to
leave
or
become
argumentative
or
physically
assault.
Y
Somebody,
obviously,
if
there's
a
criminal
action
that
stems
from
that,
that
still
would
be
prosecuted
so
like
if,
mr
hendrickson,
you
know
somebody
comes
to
the
county
clerk's,
you
know
counter
and
he
asks
them
to
wear
a
mask
and
they
refuse
to
leave
and
then
start
destroying
property
that
we
would
deal
with,
because
that
would
actually
be
a
criminal
action.
But
at
this
time
there's
no
prosecution
or
fines
for
not
wearing
a
mask
and
not
complying,
but
the
county
board
can
require
masks
in
the
county
administration
building.
A
Y
Right,
it's
just
it's
not
determined.
We
don't
know
at
this
point
I
mean,
obviously
it's
a
court
ruling,
we're
not
saying
that,
but
the
fourth
circuit
is
not
our
court
of
original
jurisdiction
and
what
that
means
is
at
this
point.
I
can't
go
appeal
that
case,
because
it's
not
my
court
of
original
jurisdiction
and,
for
example,
if
a
car
accident
would
happen
here
in
kankakee
county
by
two
kankakee
county
residents.
I
wouldn't
file
a
case
down
in
the
fourth
circuit,
because
that
wouldn't
have
jurisdiction,
because
the
event
didn't
happen
here
and
the
people
didn't.
Y
You
know,
didn't
weren't
down
there
it
it
does
have
some
weight
because
it
is
a
judge
who
made
a
ruling
of
a
competent
jurisdiction,
but
it's
still
not
been
determined
we've
not
once
the
illinois
supreme
court
weighs
in
or
for
us
21st
circuit
or
the
third
district
appellate
court.
You
know,
then
that
yeah
would
have
definitely
more
weight
on
what
we
do.
But
at
this
time
there's
not
been
anything
okay,.
Y
Because
the
21st
we're
in
a
different
circuit-
that's
a
fourth
circuit.
Also
the
issue
too,
is
that
court
case
was
brought
why
we
were
in
phase
two
and
phase
three
of
the
governor's
executive
order.
There
were
different
restrictions
at
the
time
that
were
being
ruled
on,
so
there
have
even
been
some
legal,
some
lawyers
and
some
different
legal
experts
that
have
weighed
in
to
say
that
conditions
now
have
even
changed
that
had
lawsuit
a
similar
lawsuit
brought
now
under.
E
E
monthly
building
division
report
from
may
2020.
Four
permits
total
permits
fees
of
thirty,
three
thousand
nine;
twenty
seven
total
extra
fees
of
thirty
nine
hundred.
Seventy
four
dollars
for
a
total
of
thirty
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
one
dollars
the
monthly
resolution
list
for
july
2020,
total
of
the
county,
fifteen
thousand
seven
hundred
thirty
six
dollars
and
ninety
cents.
Is
there
a
motion
to.
M
F
H
H
E
E
D
C
A
E
The
appointment
of
craig
long
to
the
kinky
county
gis
committee,
the
reappointment
of
duane
hull
to
the
auto
township
fire
protection
district,
the
reappointment
of
paul,
a
mao
to
the
cabery
area,
fire
protection
district
resolution
for
the
selection
of
election
judges,
amended
schedule
for
holidays
to
be
observed
by
the
offices
of
king
key
county
for
calendar
year.
2020
resolution
and
disposal
of
surplus
and
unwanted
vehicles
for
the
kaneki
county,
sheriff's
department.
F
H
H
D
D
J
A
A
R
Screen,
oh
there,
it
is
okay,
okay,
now
how's
that
all
right
there
we
go
is
that
working?
Okay,
all
right!
This
is
a
request
for
a
special
use
permit
for
a
heavy
processing
facility
in
the
a1
district.
It
is
not
a
rezoning.
I've
heard
several
times
throughout
the
process
that
it
is
rezoning.
There
is
no
change
in
zoning.
It's
just
a
special
use.
R
Permit
it's
for
the
recycling
of
used,
concrete,
which
is
crushed
into
gravel
and
the
rebar
is
removed
from
it,
and
also
recycle
soil
and
clay
from
construction
sites
that
those
materials
are
screened
to
remove,
rocks
and
other
formed
materials
that
might
be
in
the
facility
has
been
operating
for
a
few
years,
at
least
without
a
special
use.
Permit
property
is
33.85
acres
in
size.
It's
on
the
west
side
of
van
siding
road
about
a
quarter
mile
or
so
south
of
route.
17.
R
and
the
recycling
operation
occurs
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
There's
a
large
19,
000,
plus
square
foot,
barn
on
the
front
of
the
property.
The
property
has
several
buses
on
it.
These
are
like
charter
buses
and
we
have
totally
owners.
Those
must
be
removed.
Whether
the
special
use
permit
is
granted
or
not,
they
cannot
be
there.
R
Here's
a
aerial
photo
of
the
property,
the
33
33
35
acres
is
outlined
in
the
red.
The
large
pole,
barn
was
not
on
the
aerial
photo
when
the
photo
was
taken.
It
is
outlined
in
green.
The
recycling
operation
is
towards
the
rear
of
the
property
highlighted
with
the
orange
circle
on
it
towards
the
rear.
It
may
go
a
little
bit
larger
than
that
circle,
but
that
is
the
general
location
of
the
recycling
operation.
R
R
We've
had
multiple
hearings
on
this
case,
starting
at
december,
9th
public
hearing
zba
voted
three
to
three
and
made
no
recommendation
december.
18Th
planning
and
zoning
committee
sent
it
back
to
the
zoning
board
for
more
deliberation
january
13th
the
there
was
a
public
hearing,
but
it
was
continued
because
we
had
a
lack
of
form.
R
R
R
R
So
the
planning
and
zoning
committee
did
recognize
that
there
could
be
issues
and
they've
placed
conditions
on
it
to
alleviate
those
issues
number
one.
The
operation
must
maintain
all
required
permits
from
the
iepa
kankakee
county
and
other
agencies
at
all
times,
including
a
valid
ross
permit
and
must
comply
with
all
directives
issued
by
the
iepa,
which
has
jurisdiction
over
dusk
number.
Two,
the
processing
and
storage
of
materials
is
limited
to
the
rear,
1000
feet
of
the
property
and
the
storage
of
materials
would
be
allowed
in
the
rear,
1500
feet
of
the
property.
R
Finding
number
two-
the
special
use,
will
not
be
injurious
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
the
property
in
the
immediate
vicinity
for
the
purposes
already
permitted,
or
substantially
diminish
and
impair
property
values
within
the
neighborhood
pca.
Found
that
the
subject
property
in
the
area
surrounding
the
subject
property
is
zoned.
A1
agriculture,
the
board
finds
that
the
operations
distance
from
adjacent
homes,
coupled
with
the
fact
that
the
property
is
nearly
surrounded
with
mature
trees
and
agricultural
fields,
that
the
enjoyment
of
the
germany
properties
is
not
unduly
injured,
provided
that
hours
of
operations
are
limited.
R
R
Number
two
limits
what
can
be
done
there
only
use
concrete
brick,
rock
uncontaminated
soils,
clay
or
similar
materials
in
accordance
with
the
ordinance
related
to
the
special
use.
Permit
shall
be
accepted
at
the
facility
for
processing,
so
you
can
only
accept
what's
on
that
list
or
something
very
similar
to
it.
Number
three
open
burning
shall
only
be
permitted
on
the
rear,
1500
feet
of
the
property
currently,
but
state
law
allows
you
to
open,
burn
landscape
waste
on
your
property
that
has
been
generated
from
your
property.
R
This
would
limit
him
to,
even
though
he
has
a
legal
right
to
do
so.
This
condition
would
limit
him
to
the
rear,
1500
feet
of
the
property
again,
keeping
it
as
far
away
from
his
neighbor's
homes
as
possible
and
for
a
speed
limit
of
10
miles
per
hour
shall
be
imposed
on
all
vehicles
operating
on
the
property
and
size
will
be
placed
along
the
driveway
indicating
the
speed
limit
that
is
designed
to
keep
any
dust
down.
That
would
emanate
from
trucks
entering
and
leaving
the
property.
R
Number
three:
that
the
establishment
of
the
special
use
will
not
substantially
impede
the
normal
and
orderly
development
and
improvement
of
the
surrounding
property
for
uses
permitted
in
the
district
uca
found
that
the
subject
property
in
the
area
surrounding
the
subject
property
is
zoned,
a1
agriculture
or
further
found
that
the
development
of
surrounding
properties
for
agricultural
purposes
and
uses
permitted
within
the
agricultural
district
will
not
be
impeded
by
the
establishment
of
the
special
use.
Permit.
R
R
The
board
also
finds
that
all
necessary
public
facilities
have
been,
or
will
be
provided
and
the
following
conditions
have
been
applied
to
this.
Finding
the
property
owner
shall
cause
a
drainage
study
of
the
property
to
be
conducted
at
their
expense
to
evaluate
the
effects
that
elevating
the
property
has
had
on
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
This
study
shall
be
completed
within
24
months
of
approval
of
special
use
and
any
improvements
or
changes
to
drainage
shall
be
completed
within
24
months
of
the
date
of
the
completed
study
at
the
owner's
expense.
R
R
R
Number
five,
that
adequate
measures
have
been
or
will
be
taken
to
provide
ingress
and
egress.
So
design
is
to
minimize
traffic
congestion
in
the
public
streets.
The
board
found
that
the
owner
has
provided
a
33-foot
entrance
at
van
siding
road
to
accommodate
truck
movement
into
the
facility
and
that
an
access
road
has
been
established
on
the
property.
R
The
board
also
finds
that
the
access
road
has
been
paid
for
the
first
400
feet
and
that
bit
max
dust
control
is
used
on
the
remainder
of
the
access
row.
The
board
further
finds
that
the
township
road
commissioner
has
provided
a
written
statement
in
the
form
of
a
letter
indicating
the
truck
traffic
to
and
from
the
facility
has
not
been
an
issue
for
the
road
network.
R
Tza
found
that
the
applicant
is
not
seeking
any
variation
to
the
county
zoning
regulations.
In
regard
to
this
request,
you
know,
I
know
one
of
the
public
commenters
mentioned
the
variance.
There
are
no
variances
associated
with
this.
The
board
further
finds
that
the
special
use
permit
will
comply
with
all
aspects
of
the
county.
Zoning
ordinance
and
all
conditions
are
placed
upon
placed
upon
the
special
use
permit.
R
A
R
M
R
A
R
R
R
F
R
A
V
V
R
The
hours
of
operation
of
the
facility
is
that's
that's
up
to
the
board
if
you
feel
that
the
neighbors
would
be
limiting
their
hours
further
and
removing
saturdays
would
would
eliminate
issues
with
the
neighbors,
then
by
all
means
that
is
appropriate
to
do
so,
and
the
elimination
of
dust
or
any
possibility
of
dust
at
the
facility
would
also
be
a
would
also
be
appropriate.
So
adding
a
functional
dust
suppression
system
to
the
crusher
would
would
also
be
appropriate
if
the
board
would
like
to
do
so.
V
R
R
R
A
From
the
board
okay,
well,
I
guess
my
only
comment
is:
is
I'm
absolutely
in
agreement
with
the
dust
suppression
system,
but
operating
dictating
no
operations
on
saturday,
I
think,
is
an
unnecessary
impediment
to
the
business
model.
So
I'm
going
to
be
voting
against
it.
Just
because
of
that,
but
that's
just
my
explanation
of
why.
B
B
A
Well,
sunday
was
already
not
open
for
business.
That
was
already
that
wasn't
in
the
original
motion
that
was
a
given,
so
saturday
is,
is
just
eliminating.
I
don't
think
that's
going
to
do
anything
for
the
neighbors.
I
don't
think
this
is
is
going
to
appease
them
at
all
based
on
their
statements,
so
I
think
it's
an
unnecessary
restriction
that
we're
doing
that
doesn't
help
the
overall
feeling
of
the
neighborhood.
That's
my
own
opinion
again.
The
dust
suppression
thing.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
absolutely
valid
thought.
A
A
Q
You
asked
for
any
extra
thoughts,
we're
voting
on
an
amendment
and
then
we'll
vote
on
the
actual
zba
case.
Maybe
it
should
be
sent
back
so
that
there
can
be
more
discussion
from
the
neighbors
after
these
I'd
like
to
hear
what
they
would
say
after
hearing
these
amendments
and
that,
if
we
vote
on
it
today,
it's
not
going
to
give
them
that
opportunity.
A
The
and
that
can
come
up
as
a
with
a
another
amendment
that
comes
after
this,
this
we're
discussing
right
now,
so
if
the
board
feels
that
they
want
to
send
it
back
after
we're
done
with
the
current
business
in
front
of
us,
then
we
can
do
that
right.
So
is
there
any
other
comments
about
the
current
amendments
that
we're
proposing
to
insert
into
the
final
proposal.
V
V
U
R
A
And
I
I
do
remember
hearing
that,
but
unfortunately,
today
is
not
testimony.
That
was
public
comment.
The
testimony
was
during
pza
and
zba.
That's
the
only
evidence
that
we're
allowed
to
consider
if
you
made
a
trip
out
there
and
they
said
something
about
truck
traffic.
That
would
be
ex
parte
communication
that
should
have
been
revealed
to
the
board
in
pca.
I'm
not
saying
you
did
anything
wrong,
but
there's
evidence
that
was
considered
that
the
whole
board
is
not
considering.
R
V
Y
C
A
A
E
E
E
S
H
H
F
U
E
S
F
R
A
H
R
V
Yes,
sir,
normally
I
you
would
you
know,
I
decide
on
the
part
of
on
behalf
of
the
property
owners,
so
I
listened
attentively
to
the
their
concerns.
I
believe
that
we
addressed
the.
It
was
the
dust
issue
that
was
the
major
concern,
and
so,
as
a
result,
that's
now
been
addressed
in
our
amended
motion
even
to
including
the
weekends.
V
So
I
believe
in
this
case
I
have
to
vote
yes,
given
that
we
placed
seven
conditions
and
now
possibly
eight
the
eighth
one
into
the
into
the
conditions,
and
then
we
amended
one
to
include
saturday,
I'm
believing
that
that
should
kind
of
resolve
the
issue
along
with
all
of
the
other
safeguards
that's
in
place.
So
generally,
yes,
I
support
the
property
owners.
However,
listening
to
them,
I
believe
that
these
amendments
have
been
addressed.
V
X
Q
Q
X
A
A
A
F
F
S
B
H
S
D
R
H
H
O
A
Motion
carries
moving
on
zba
case
20-02,
rezoning
from
a1
ag
district
to
a
rural
estate
district
and
variance
to
section
121-286
c1
driveway
intervals
in
section
21
of
yellowhead
township
dell.
Do
you
have
something
on
this?
Please
I
do
while
we're
while
he's
looking.
Can
I
get
a
motion
on
the
floor?
Please
so
move
the
motion
motion
with
mr
hess.
Second,
with
mr
snipes.
R
R
So,
in
order
to
do
that,
they'd
like
to
divide
four
acres
out
of
the
farm
and
build
a
home
on
it
to
accomplish
that
the
the
new
parcel
would
have
to
be
zoned
rural
estate,
and
since
it
has
to
have
its
own
driveway,
they
would
need
a
variance
for
driveway.
Spacing
zoning
board
of
appeals,
met
on
june
8th
and
had
a
public
hearing
and
recommends
the
approval
of
both
the
variance
and
the
rezoning
five
to
zero.
There
were
no
objectors
present
and
pca
on
the
17th
also
recommended
the
approval.
E
D
H
H
F
K
A
R
R
A
H
H
F
E
D
A
D
A
R
R
R
The
platt
went
out
for
45
day
review
and
the
only
comment
we
got
was
from
mark
rogers
at
the
highway
department,
reminding
us
that
the
there
is
a
stormwater
pipe
that
runs
through
the
north
side
of
the
property
and
that
an
easement
would
be
required
for
that.
So
the
flat
was
revised
to
include
a
20-foot
storm,
sewer
easement
on
the
north
side,
which
you
can
see
on
the
screen
there.
R
The
lot
is
similar
in
size
to
other
lots
within
riverside
country
of
state's
first
edition
and
would
be
bound
by
the
same
covenants
and
restrictions
of
that
subdivision
as
well.
I
believe
mr
dave
tyson
is
on
the
zoom
meeting
here.
If
you
have
any
technical
questions,
he's
the
engineer
of
the
project.
A
S
P
H
H
E
H
F
H
H
M
M
A
A
Z
A
A
Z
On
the
project,
the
first
was
from
mid-american
group.
The
second
was
from
general
energy
group,
mid-americans
bid
for
the
project
was
761,
643,
general
energies
bid
was
737
178
and
obviously
a
major
component
of
this
project
is
the
fact
that
constellation
energy
is
going
to
finance
the
project.
For
a
let's
see.
What
was
the
term
look
through
my
notes
here
term.
Z
Z
Yeah
we're
going
to
convert
all
the
light
fixtures
in
the
courthouse.
The
annex,
the
old
jail
jerome
combs
detention
center
does
not
include
this
building,
so
it's
all
of
those
buildings
not
189,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
full
conversion.
Switch
out
of
fixtures
to
energy
saving
leds
at
all.
Those
facilities.
A
And
so,
basically,
the
the
savings
that
we'll
enjoy
in
energy
are
going
to
pay
for
the
replacing
of
all
this
and
constellation
energy
is
who
is
our
who
we're
with
as
our
company
as
far
as
providing
electricity,
they're
they're,
the
ones
who
are
going
to
front
the
money
for
this
at
zero
percent
interest?
They
get
paid
back
over
the
years
and
then,
after
five
years,
81
months,
81
months,
okay,
then
it's
paid
for
and
then
we
enjoy
the
savings.
Yeah.
Z
Currently,
our
current
budget
right
now
for
those
buildings
is
43
000
a
month
for
energy.
During
the
agreement
after
the
leds
are
installed.
We
anticipate
that
to
go
down
to
35
357
for
a
savings
of
about
9
100
a
month
and
then
there's
also
some
maintenance
savings
in
there
as
well,
but
the
gist
of
it
is
it's
budget
positive
to
the
tune
of
about
242
dollars
a
month
during
the
term
of
the
agreement.
A
A
Z
X
A
They
do
not
put
it
like
this.
We
we
have
the
eeoc
requirements
and
we
have
prevailing
wage
audits
that
have
to
be
done
and
things
like
that,
so
they
have
to
comply
in
that
manner.
I
don't
know
that
we
have
ever
asked
for
that,
because
we
can't
we
can't
get
preference
on
bids.
It's
not
like
home
rule.
It's
a
little
bit
different.
We
can't
have
like
a
local
bidder
or
any
of
that
other
kind
of
stuff.
A
I
understand
that
yeah,
but
I
know
that
I
believe
it's
a
minority-owned
business
right,
I'm
pretty
pretty
sure
because
the
we
had
the
principles
come
down
to
the
meeting,
and
so
you
know
I
can
I
can.
I
can
say
that,
okay,
but
as
far
as
the
workforce,
I
don't
know
who's
the
guys
that
are
turning
the
wrenches
yeah.
N
A
A
If
somebody
else
would
do
it,
the
initial
company
had
come
out
and
did
the
surveys
and
did
all
the
totaling
and-
and
we
discussed
those
prices
at
open
meetings,
and
then
the
committee
said
well,
let's
find
somebody
else
which
was
a
little
bit
unfair,
in
my
opinion,
in
a
big
way,
but
the
the
the
little
or
bitter
turned
out
to
be
the
original
company
anyway.
So
any
other
thoughts,
because
they
do
have
to
have
this
complete
by
the
end
of
the
year
for
us
to
get
the
energy
credit.
A
A
E
N
D
E
A
E
F
F
E
N
M
M
J
J
J
M
J
J
A
S
F
H
H
H
S
F
B
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
other
business,
one
opening
on
the
mantino
number
nine
drainage
district;
there's;
actually
only
one
opening
on
the
zba
zoning
board
of
appeals.
It's
a
typo
three
openings
on
the
regional
planning
commission,
five
openings
on
the
kanke
county
board
of
health,
one
opening
on
the
farmland
review
assessment
committee,
one
on
the
kenky
river
valley,
forest
reserve
district,
one
on
university
of
illinois
extension;
don't
know
the
nature
of
that
appointment.
I
don't
think
it's
a
board
member
county
board
member.