►
From YouTube: Kankakee County Board Meeting 7/11/2017
Description
Kankakee County Board Meeting 7/11/2017 9:00AM
A
A
B
Morning,
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
the
july
11th
kankakee
county,
full
board
meeting
for
your
invocation,
mr
jim
vickery.
This
morning,.
C
F
B
We
have
quorum
under
public
commentary,
we
have
wesley
suns,
please
the
microphones
right
back
there,
sir.
E
Morning,
everybody
morning,
I
was
here
a
couple
weeks
ago
when
they
had
the
buildings
administration
meeting
here,
and
I
brought
up
some
things
with
the
code
violations.
That's
going
on
in
the
property.
Next
to
me,
I
brought
up
quite
a
few
of
them
a
lot
of
it's
hard
to
explain
without
people,
seeing
what
this
place
looks
like
there's.
A
lot
of
you
here
know
what
it
looks
like
some
of
you
might
know
what
it's
what's
going
on
there.
E
I've
got
some
pictures
here
that
I'd
like
to
kind
of
pass
around
with
people
see
I
highlighted
on
there
some
of
the
things
I'll
go
through
regarding
the
codes.
What
I've
got
to
see
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
bring
you
in
the
fresh
air.
From
my
place
it
smells
exactly
like
cow
urine,
like
hundreds
of
cow
urine,
it's
that
disgusting
people
come
over
to
my
house,
the
first
thing
they
say:
wow,
you
got
a
nice
piece
of
property
here,
oh
my
god.
Does
it
always
smell
like
this?
E
E
That's
how
disgusting
it
is
the
flies
you
come
over
lock
your
car
up
immediately
close
all
the
windows,
because,
if
you
go
back
in
it'll,
be
full
of
flies,
I've
had
a
person
come
over
and
drop
a
camper
off
at
my
property
for
a
week,
so
I
could
repair
the
hitch
on
it
while
he
was
out
of
town
he'd
come
back.
He
said
two
weeks
later,
his
camper
still
smells
like
cows
he's
been
using
febreze.
E
He
goes
it's
in
the
insulation,
it's
inside
it
it's
disgusting
yeah,
but
I've
got
some
pictures
here
from
what
I'm
showing.
I
got
a
couple
pictures
I
one
picture
of
my
property
is
a
neighboring
property,
another
picture
of
the
property
of
the
lady
across
the
street,
who
looks
just
as
nice
all
well
manicured,
and
then
I
got
the
property
in
question
right
next
door,
their
privacy
fence,
which
is
not
allowed
per
code
to
have
this
fence
a
solid
fence
along
a
right
away.
E
The
manure
running
out
underneath
the
privacy
fence
disgusting
runs
right
into
the
public
right-of-way.
I
called
epa
and
the
first
thing
they
asked
me:
well,
why
is
the
county
allowing
cows
there
it's
a
residential
lot
as
well.
I've
got
I've
got
a
list
of
excuses
for
that
one,
the
building
editions
I've
been
putting
on
here
and
calling
the
county.
You
know
because
they
just
say
they
don't
see
it
all.
The
time
I've
called
took
in
pictures
of
building
editions.
Usually
it's
a
new
building
edition
on
the
weekends
when
nobody
can
come
out
there.
E
E
I
don't
have
an
overhead
view
of
what
it
looks
like
now.
It's
just
going
worse.
Worse
worse,
every
year,
the
manure
pile
there's
a
manure
pile
out
there
as
big
as
a
semi,
but
when
I
complained
about
the
water
runoff
onto
my
property
and
the
health
department
came
out
and
was
taking
pictures,
they
asked.
Why
are
you
taking
pictures
and
they
mentioned
because
of
all
your
manure
water
is
running
on
mr
sanz's
property?
E
They
took
them
into
a
pile,
put
a
rubber
strip,
all
the
way
around
their
fence
and
pile
manure
two
feet
high
around
it
to
hold
the
water
back
yeah.
So
now
the
manure
is
even
closer
to
my
house.
You
know
this
is
literally
disgusting.
It's
degrading
to
my
property
value,
degrading
to
the
neighbor's
property
value.
E
Why
they
don't
get
permits.
Why
they're
allowed
to
use
the
buildings?
I'm
not
sure
the
code
strictly
says.
If
you
don't
have
the
occupancy
permit
in
the
final
inspection,
you
cannot
use
that
building.
Well,
they
keep
adding
and
adding
nobody's
ever
looked
at
a
single
building
out
there,
the
code
inspection.
There
is
no
code
inspections
out
there.
They
complained
about
defenses
and
they
said
it's
farm
fence.
I
got
I'll
go
through
a
couple
here:
the
code
violations
there's
at
least
ten
ten
years.
I
got
no
results,
the
health
issues.
E
E
The
fencing
is
not
it's
supposed
to
be
finished
side
out,
there's
no
finished
side,
there's
no
finish
side
in
or
out
on
those
fences,
they're
putting
up
the
solid
fence,
they're
not
allowed
the
horses
they're
allowed
one
horse
per
acre,
they
have
five
acres,
they've
got
at
least
20
horses
in
the
barn.
I've
been
complaining
about
that
for
10
years
the
cattle
started
out
as
two
or
three
then
a
rodeo,
then
five
or
ten.
Now
there's
40
out
there,
the
porta
potties
they
got
probably
15
people
living
in
that
house.
They
built
the
building.
E
The
last
building
they
got
a
permit
for
is
on
top
of
the
septic
field,
and
I
got
papers
coming
to
shield
out,
but
so
their
septic
probably
isn't
working
they've
had
porta
potties
there.
I
called
the
health
department,
they
said.
Well,
we
can't
go
on
the
property
unless
we're
invited.
E
So
when
the
guy
said,
why
are
you
taking
pictures?
That's
when
he
said?
Oh,
you
know
they
said
well
come
on
our
property.
We
can
show
you,
you
know,
and
he
went
over
there
and
I
said
okay
you're
invited
ask
him
about
the
porta
potties.
I
called
him
a
couple
days
later.
I
forgot
to
ask
him
about
that,
but
well
when
their
porta-potties
are
full,
they
pick
it
up
with
a
bobcat
and
take
it
out
in
the
cow
pasture
about
100
feet
away
from
my
house
and
dump
them
and
go
send
them
back
over
there.
E
This
been
going
on
for
years.
The
flies
is
disgusting,
yeah,
yeah
and
I've
been
to
the
car
department.
I
got
a
list
of
excuses.
It's
three
pages,
one
of
them.
It's
a
farm.
No,
it's
not
a
farm.
It's
zoned,
a2!
It's
a
residential
estate
in
an
agricultural
district,
you're
the
code
officer.
You
should
know
that
the.
E
Oh
and
he
said,
okay
not
allowed
to
have
cattle,
but
those
are
exotic
animals.
So
there's
a
stipulation
where
they're
about
exotic
animals
says
cows
in
there.
Well,
I
can
see
a
exotic
cow,
you
know
long
curly
horns
or
a
little
fuzzy
cow
or
something
there's
40
to
50
cows.
Out
there.
That's
not
exotic
animals,
it's
livestock
and
the
code
strictly
says
no
livestock
next
excuse
I'll,
look
into
it.
I'll
get
back
to
you.
When
I'm
talking
about
the
buildings
you
know
but
and
we've
had
budget
cuts,
we
don't
have
as
many
people
budget
cuts.
E
E
If
I
didn't
do
my
job,
where
I'm
at
I
wouldn't
have
a
job
can't
go,
he
said
he
can't
go
on
the
property
unless
they're
invited
they
were
invited
in
the
manure.
When
I
called
the
health
department
about
that,
they
said
they
don't
handle
livestock
waste.
Only
human
waste
called
the
epa.
They
call
the
epa,
they
give
me
the
same
answer:
why
are
they
allowed
livestock
and
they'll
look
into
it?
You
know,
that's
that's,
mr.
B
B
B
If
anybody
would
like
information
about
the
situation,
we
did
discuss
it
at
pza
last
month
that
the
video
is
online
and
then,
if
any
members
of
that
committee
would
like
to
see
it
on
the
agenda
for
further
explanation,
just
let
me
and
mr
oltof
know,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
the
questions
you
may
have
were
discussed
at
the
end
of
that
meeting.
So
let
me
know
if
there's
any
further
questions.
Thank
you.
B
Moving
on
under
communications,
known
today,
presentations
we
have
a
proclamation
honoring
george
grasso's
years
of
service
on
the
limestone
township
fire
protection
district
board.
Mr
clark,
if
you
could
please
read
that
into
the
record.
F
Whereas
mr
grosso
began
his
service
november
of
1958
as
a
rookie
firefighter
and
served
with
dedication
until
he
was
appointed
a
trustee
to
the
district
in
1981
and
whereas
mr
grossa
would
often
take
time
away
from
his
business
to
respond
to
fire
alarms,
including
the
week-long
philips,
petroleum
gas.
Well,
the
limestone
school
and
the
crescent
city
train
derailment,
whereas
mr
grosso
also
participated
in
two
fire
station.
F
Remodels,
an
expansion
as
well
as
the
construction
of
a
new
station
on
illinois
route,
17
just
west
of
kankakee,
whereas
the
kanke
county
board
recognized
the
outstanding
achievement,
excellence,
tradition
and
leadership
and
congratulates
george
grosso
and
his
incredible
achievements
and
service.
Now,
therefore
be
proclaimed
by
the
kinky
county
board
that
it
recognizes
and
congratulates
george
grasso
for
his
59
years
of
service
to
the
limestone
township
fire
protection
district.
We
congratulate
him
on
his
recent
retirement.
B
B
All
right,
we
didn't
seem
to
get
him
here
today,
but
we'll
make
sure
he
gets
that
proclamation
in
hand
that
was
at
the
nomination
of
the
fire
protection
district.
So
we
do.
We
appreciate
your
service,
no
vacancy
appointments
to
announce
at
this
time,
certificates
of
recognition,
richard
ball,
15
years
at
the
sheriff's
department,
gene
vinke,
15
years
at
the
sheriff's
department,
deborah
kolasar
jazerski,
15
years
at
the
circuit
clerk
and
randy
bertrand
40
years
at
the
highway
department.
Randy
are
you
here?
Yes,
he
is
join
me
over
here.
Please.
D
B
Moving
on
minutes
of
the
last
meeting
june
13
2017,
I
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
Mr
payton,
second,
mr
oltof,
all
those
in
favor
those
opposed
motion
carries
also
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
amended
executive
session
minutes
that
we
approved
at
the
june
13
2017
county
board
meeting
we
released
executive
session
minutes.
They
needed
to
be
amended
to
clean
up
some
language,
so,
mr
washington,
second,
mr
mcconnell,
all
those
in
favor.
F
B
Alrighty
need
a
motion
to
approve
please
mr
burns.
Second,
mr
victory.
That
will
be
a
roll
call
vote.
Please.
F
B
Aye
motion
carries
the
department
reports.
I
need
a
motion
to
combine
and
accept
the
reports.
Ms
dunbar.
Second,
mr
johnson,
we
need
to
read
these
in
the
record.
Please.
F
The
county,
treasurer's
monthly
report
we've
examined
the
may
31st
2017
monthly
part
of
the
county
treasurer
and
to
the
best
of
our
knowledge,
find
it
to
be
true
and
correct:
total
checking
accounts
of
eight
million
six
hundred
sixty
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
sixty
three
dollars
and
fifty
four
cents,
general
fund
deficit
of
five
million,
one
hundred
thirty,
five
thousand
hundred
thirty
nine
dollars
and
ninety
seven
cents.
F
F
I
think
this
list
april
and
may
I
just
show
from
april
28
2017
to
may
31st
2017
may
month
in
checks-
are
sixteen
thousand
are
five
hundred
sixteen
thousand
four
hundred
eighty
two
dollars
and
ninety
eight
cents.
F
That's
the
may
report.
The
april
2017
recorders
monthly
report,
balance
of
april
2017
disbursement
fees
paid
to
the
county
trade
of
89
378.75.
F
F
The
animal
control
report
for
the
month
of
april
2017
there
were
a
total
fund
submitted
to
the
treasure
of
one
thousand
three
hundred
sixty
five
dollars:
ninety
seven
dollars
and
twenty
seven
cents
in
the
building
fund,
and
there
were
eighty
animals
handled
for
the
animal
control
report
for
the
month
of
may
2017,
a
total
amount
of
five
hundred
ninety
three
dollars
and
fifty
cent
cents
in
fifty
cents
there
were
104
animals
handled
and
if
tip
building
fund
was
nothing
the
billing
report.
F
The
monthly
resolution
list
from
the
county
trustee
for
july
2017
is
placed
on
file
in
the
iroquois
regional
superintendent's
report.
I
greg
murphy,
iroquois,
kinky,
regional
superintendent
of
schools,
who
solemnly
swear
that
the
attached
report
is
a
true
statement
of
receipts
and
disbursements
of
the
county
support
funds
and
my
office
for
the
quarter.
Ending
may
31
2017
is
placed
on
file.
B
Thank
you,
mr
clark.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
questions.
All
those
in
favor.
Those
opposed
motion
carries
committee
presentations
resolutions
on
the
consent
agenda
is
there
anything
anybody
would
like
removed
from
the
consent
agenda.
Ask
again
anything
to
remove.
B
F
The
ordinance
removing
the
state's
attorney
as
a
county
ethics
advisor
the
appointment
of
the
honorable
kendall,
o
wenzelman
as
the
kinky
county
ethics
advisor
of
the
appointment
of
rick
manuel
to
the
kanke
county,
regional
planning,
commission
reappointment
of
michael
donahue
to
the
kinky
county,
historic
preservation.
Commission,
the
re-appointment
of
kenneth
brickman
is
commissioner
to
the
moments
pembroke
union
drainage
district
number
one.
F
F
This
is
establishing
the
holidays
for
calendar
year
2018.
F
the
declarat
declaration
of
surplus
wave
runners
for
the
kinky
county
sheriff's
department
and
the
approval
of
the
2016
comprehensive's
annual
financial
report
prepared
by
the
outside
auditor
smith.
Dyke
for
failing
in
home.
F
Mr
tripp
aye
mr
washington
aye
mr
ledges,
mr
vickery,
mr
olta,
mr
hess
aye,
mr
tholen
aye,
mrs
polk
aye,
mr
mcconnell
aye,
mr
scott
aye,
mr
snipes,
mr
byrne
aye,
mr
c
roy
aye,
mr
hildebrand
aye.
This
is
weber,
mrs
peters,
mrs
evans,
mr
payton,
mr
johnson,
mrs
parker,
ms
dunbar,
mr
ritter,
aye,
mr
wheeler
aye,.
B
Motion
carries
moving
on
to
the
finance
committee,
a
resolution
authorizing
the
county
board
chairman
to
sign
a
cyber
insurance
policy
with
bcs
insurance
company
number
99.
First,
I
need
a
motion
to
approve
mr
payton.
Second,
mr
siroi.
Any
discussion.
Basically,
if
you
have
any
questions,
this
is
a
policy
that
covers
us
on
any
type
of
a
claim
resulting
for
excuse
me
a
claim
that's
within
our
coverage
limits
resulting
from
any
cyber
attack.
This
is
something
that
the
health
department
does
that's
required
by
grants.
B
We
looked
into
the
cost
of
this
because
of
obvious
the
the
turn
and
the
way
that
people
are
being
ransomed.
We
know
that
they
tried
to
to
hit
us
a
few
years
back.
We
have
a
pretty
good
system,
we're
pretty
buttoned
up
tight,
but
if,
if
there
is
some
type
of
an
event-
and
there
is
a
lawsuit-
that's
a
lot
of
zeros
at
the
end
of
that
lawsuit.
B
So
if
anybody
has
any
questions,
though,
be
happy
to
answer
them,
the
actual
policy
declarations
will
come
after
we
execute
it,
but
you
see
the
limits
that
are
there
in
your
packet,
so
yeah.
The
motion
in
a
second.
B
F
G
B
It
is
not
a
russian
insurance
company
by
the
way,
just
thought.
I'd
mention
that
so
moving
on
the
amendments
to
the
combined
annual
budget
and
appropriation
for
kankakee
county
illinois
2016-2017
fiscal
year.
B
F
However,
new
transactions
are
now
identified,
see
exhibit
a
and
should
be
amended
to
twenty
seven
million,
seven
hundred
and
seven
seven
hundred
thirty.
Three
thousand
seven
hundred
eighty
two
dollars
now,
therefore
be
ordained
by
the
kinky
county
board
that
the
attach
recommended
budget
amendments
for
2016
2017
is
hereby
adopted
for
kinky
county
illinois.
For
the
fiscal
year,
beginning
december,
1,
2016
and
ending
november
30th
2017.,
the
committee
recommends
the
adoption
of
this
resolution
that
were
submitted
from
mr
jess,
mr
washington,
mr
vickery,
mr
hess,
mr
mulcahy,
mr
siroi,
ms
weber,
mr
payton
and
mr
wheeler.
B
There
actually
is
an
error
on
here,
the
the
amount
that
we
appropriated
on
october
31st
2016
was
24
million,
seven
378
forty
nine
dollars
they
they
mixed
in
the
projection.
It
looks
like
so
the
amount
that
we
did
budget
for
sixteen.
Seventeen
was
twenty
four
million
three
hundred
seventy
eight
thousand
seven
hundred
forty
nine
dollars.
Would
you
consider
that
a
scrivener's
there
and
just
got
pulled
off
the
wrong
column
motion
to
amend
ms
dunbar?
Second,
mr
lejes,
see
what
I
mean.
B
B
So
that
being
said,
let's
can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
before
we
do
discussion
the
amendments,
mr
washington?
Second,
mr
johnson,
all
right
any
questions
about
what
we
did
in
the
finance
committee
meeting.
There
was
a
lot
of
people
here
that
were
not
weren't
on
finance.
That
came
to
the
meeting
that
were
involved
in
the
discussion.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
we
answer
any
questions
before
we
move
forward.
F
B
F
Whereas
main
street
moments
continues
to
use
the
funds
for
this
purpose
and
the
county
board
sees
value
in
maintaining
their
program,
whereas
the
finance
committee,
its
regularly
scheduled
meeting
on
june
28
2017
after
review
and
discussion,
recommends
that
the
loan
to
main
street
moments
be
converted
into
a
grant
and
would
therefore
waive
any
repayment.
Now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved
by
the
kinky
county
board
that
the
50
000
revolving
loan
to
main
street
moments
is
hereby
converted
into
a
grant
and
the
county
will
not
see
repayment.
B
Thank
you.
I
guess.
First,
the
motion
to
approve
mr
vickery.
Second,
miss
dunbar.
Any
questions.
Yes,
we'll
start
with
mr
snipes
just
a
moment.
Please.
H
I
guess
man,
it's
gonna,
be
two-part,
because
I
see
that
there's
we're
raving
and
writing
off,
but
while
the
deaths
are
being
dissolved,
the
language
involved
in
the
dissolution
of
the
debts
tends
to
raise
the
eyebrow.
Why
one
is
being
converted
to
a
grant
and
the
other
one
just
say,
uncollectible
debt?
Why
not
both
either
being
converted
or
why?
The
disparity
is
to
the
difference.
B
I
I
would,
I
understand
the
question
mr
rowe
had
a
comment.
I
And
there
definitely
is
a
difference,
but
was
there
any
audit
undertaken
by
the
county
of
either
of
these
funds
the
funds
to
moments
or
to
it
was
a
pembroke
township
to
to
see
how
they
were
being
used,
whether
they
were
whether
the
end
user
was
making
repayments
back
to
moments
or
the
township.
B
Yes,
mr
vickery
and
I
met
with
main
street
moments.
We
looked
through
the
books
to
see
what
loans
that
were
still
outstanding
that
were
being
repaid,
which
ones
ended
up
being
bad
loans
if
you
will
and
what
was
still
out
there
in
circulation.
B
So
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
if
we
did
say
you
know
this
a
little
background,
we
have
to
end
the
program
on
the
revolving
loan
fund,
because
the
the
federal
money
that
was
used
from
to
pass
through
the
state
of
illinois
department
of
commerce,
they
ended
the
program,
and
so
we
had
to
settle
up
all
accounts.
We've
talked
about
this
in
finance,
so
in
the
meeting
that
we
had
with
main
street
was.
Is
this
still
a
viable
situation?
Is
this
something
you
guys
still
use
that
money
for?
Is
it
still
out
and
loan?
B
Has
it
been
a
good
thing,
and
the
answer
was
yes,
as
determined
in
the
meeting?
That's
why
we
brought
it
back
to
the
finance
committee
in
the
situation
with
hopkins
park.
It
was.
It
was
very
different
because
that
was
used
to
purchase
furniture
and
laptop
computers
back
when
they
were
doing
the
business
incubator
out
there.
I
have
to
look
at
the
date
but
looks.
B
And
so
that
was
used
as
collateral
against
the
loan.
So
there
is
no
collecting
on
that
loan
because
the
furniture
is
old
and
the
computers
are
old
and
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff
they
wouldn't
be
near
the
value
so
that
we're
just
going
to
write
off
that
debt.
So
we
can
approach
that
at
the
same
time,
but
it
was
vastly
different
situations.
H
But
it
appears
that
both
look
as
if
they
were
you
utilized
for
one
was
improvement
for
the
power
center
for
purchase,
computers
and
stuff.
H
I
guess
equipment
to
kind
of
update
and
do
what
they
needed
to
do
out
there,
for
whatever
reason,
the
other
utilize
theirs
to
to
make
further
small
loans
to
organizations
and
businesses
where,
if
I'm
looking
at
this
at
first
glance
I
would
have,
I
would
just
presume
I
don't
want
to
say
assume,
because
they
break
that
word
down,
but
presume
that
you
would
have
gotten
a
return
either
from
those
businesses
that
they
were
subsidizing
with
these
additional
funds.
And
we
it's
not
it's
not.
H
The
argument
is
not
as
to
the
use
of
them.
It
is
to
the
the
the
the
outcome
where,
as
one
is
saying,
we're
just
gonna
give
you
a
grant
the
other.
You
know
we're
going
to
write
you
off
of
debt,
it
just
it
just
you
know.
One
is
just
you
know
in
the
eyes
of
collections
or
anything
else,
even
though
you're
not
going
back
after
it
just
looks
a
little
bit.
H
I
don't
say
shady:
they
don't
go
that
far,
but
a
little
bit
of
disparity
is
there
as
to
the
softness
of
them
and
both
of
them
was
excused
as
the
grand
I
could
see
that
or
if
both
of
them
was
was
written
off
as
as
uncollectible.
I
can
see
that,
but
it
just
looks
like
it's,
not
even
a
euphemism.
It's
basically.
B
If
I
could
explain,
I
I
think
that
another
difference
lies
in
the
fact
that
momentum
had
in
multiple
times
we
had
reached
out
saying:
do
you
want
to
continue
this
program
over
the
years
when
this
first
came
up
about
the
program?
Ending
letters
were
sent
to
all
of
them
and
people
that
we
had
micro
loans
with
and
they
responded.
Yes,
this
is
doing
good
for
the
city
of
moments.
The
difference,
I
think
lies
with
the
with
the
pembroke
township
situation.
B
Is
that
all
of
that
furniture
and
all
those
computers
are
in
the
in
the
hopkins
park,
village
hall
now
they're
no
longer
even
in
the
possession
of
the
township
okay.
So
that
is
another
reason
that
we
write
it
off
because
there's
nothing
to
gain
back
and
they
never
made
a
payment
on
any
of
this
to
repay
those
loans,
whereas
moments
continually
asked
for
let's
keep
the
program
going
so
again,
I
don't
want
to
do
to
seem
that
you
know
it
is
a
very
different
situation
and
and
that's
why
the
terminology
was
set.
B
That
way,
and-
and
I
don't
know
if
mr
rowe
has
any
further
comment,
but
that's
kind
of
the
way
that
we
viewed
it
was-
is
that
we
made
a
good
faith
loan
that
no
payments
were
made
on
and
then
the
collateral
was
transferred
from
one
governmental
unit
to
another.
So
that
and
now
it
has
no
value
whatsoever.
So.
I
Why
don't
we?
Why
don't
we
have
the
auditor
review
those
documents
and
then
he
can
audit
how
the
funds
were
spent
by
pembroke
township
as
well.
H
B
We
have
current
motion
on
the
floor,
but
we
can
have
a
motion
after
that.
I
believe,
is
that
proper.
I
You
can
just
we.
I
You
know:
withdraw
these
from
the
agenda,
not
not
take
action
on
them
today
and
then
ask
the
auditor
to
attempt
to
secure
those
documents
from
moments
and
from
pembroke
township.
Well,
I.
B
Think
that
we're
going
to
move
forward
on
the
moments
one,
but
I
think
if
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
hopkins
parks
and
that's
a
relative
situation,
because
it's
we
already
approved
it
in
the
finance
committee
meeting
and
we
already
brought
that
information
back.
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
that's
the
audit
can
still
happen
after
I
would
say.
C
C
In
the
pembroke
situation,
the
state
of
illinois
awarded
a
huge
grant-
a
million
dollar
grain
out
there
to
do
this
project
when
they
drew
up
the
plans
they
didn't
include
a
new
roof
right.
George.
Remember
that
all
right,
so
heritage
development
headed
by
joe
franco,
got
the
bid
to
fix
that
building
they
fixed
the
building.
C
Then
the
rains
became
an
issue
because
the
roof
leaked
so
heritage
development
went
out
there
and
put
a
new
roof
on
that
building
and
said
we
hope
we
can
get
some
money.
C
So
the
revolving
loan
fund
committee
sat
down
with
the
finance
committee
and
got
him
40
000
48
000,
to
fix
the
roof
to
save
the
project
from
being
destroyed.
Okay,
we
use
the
building
contents
as
collateral.
We
couldn't
use
the
roof
okay,
so
we
came
up
with
the
computers
and
the
furniture
as
collateral
to
satisfy
cdap.
C
C
C
C
K
I'm
going
back
and
trying
to
remember
all
the
issues
with
the
revolving
loan
fund.
Have
we
ever
had
a
success
with
making
those
revolving
loans
and-
and
I
almost
think
we
need
to
change
the
name
loan
to
something
else,
because
I
don't
remember
it
a
gift,
it
just
doesn't
it's
it's
a
waste
of
money
that
was
made
with
repayment
in
mind
and
we've
never
been
repaid.
So
I'm
glad
this
program
has
ended.
B
I
I
will
say
that
I
would
consider
moments
a
success
because
they're
still
continually
getting
paid
on
those
loans
and
reloading
the
money
out.
That
was
the
intent
of
that.
So
I
would
say
that
that
one
is
a
success
and
that's
why
taking
all
that
money
back
would
be
detrimental
to
the
city
of
moments
and
and
what's
going
on
out
there,
but
to
your
point
we,
the
big
write-offs
we
had
with
600
000.
Maybe
at
one
point
I
mean
that
was
a
big
one.
B
You
know,
as
I
remember
about
eight
eight
years
ago,
so
there
was
a
lot
of
loss
out
of
this
program.
You
know,
but
it
should
be
it's
taxpayer
money,
but
it
was
federal
taxpayer
money.
It
wasn't
local
taxpayer
money
that
still
doesn't
make
it
good.
So
I
just
thought:
I'd
throw
that
out
there,
mr
washington.
L
I
think
our
biggest
write-off
was
the
company
that
was
to
make
parking
blocks
and
things
out
of
plastic,
and
then
I
rock
yeah
iraq,
and
that
was
the
one
that
that
really
threw
us
for
a
loop
because
it
kept
shifting
from
one
ownership
to
another
ownership
and
pretty
soon
there
was
really
nothing
to
do.
We
had
we
had
them
in
court,
we
we
went
against
them.
B
B
J
There
you
go.
Thank
you,
I
think.
Technically,
the
language
in
both
of
these
is
correct.
If
these
are
loans
that
we've
given
out
they're,
essentially
sitting
on
our
financials
as
receivables
with
the
pembroke
one,
if
we
can't
collect
that
is
bad
debt
expense,
and
we
can't
call
it
a
grant
because
it
is
a
receivable
and
we
can't
collect
it
with
the
momentum
issue.
J
The
assets
are
still
there.
We
could
have
a
transfer
of
assets
back
to
us,
we're
making
the
determination
that
we
don't
want
to
collect
on
that.
We
actually
want
to
give
that
money
back
to
them,
so
colin
won
bad
debt,
expense,
calling
the
other
one
a
grant,
I
think,
would
technically
be
correct
and
I
have
no
problem
with
the
way
the
language
is
written.
B
You
know
I
do
see
value
in
what
mr
rose
talking
about,
though
I
wonder
about
our
authority
to
audit
other
governmental
units
in
that
process.
We
it's
never
part
of
the
stipulations
of
you
know
when
we,
when
we
loan
the
money,
we
never
said
we're
going
to
come
out
we're
going
to
audit
how
you
spend
the
money.
B
It's
you,
you,
here's
the
money,
you
spend
it,
how
you
how
you
will
now
when
we're
asking
for
it
back,
it
was
yeah
we're
looking
to
see
what
was
done
with
it,
and
it
was
very
fairly
evident
in
my
opinion,
that
the
money
wasn't
used
and
or
it
wasn't
used
at
the
former
nestle
facility
for
the
purposes
to
make
that
a
viable
business
incubator.
It
never
went
anywhere
to
the
point
where
that
furniture
was
no
longer
even
there
and
those
assets
are
no
longer
there.
B
B
I
think
that's
fair,
but
to
your
point
you
know
I
don't
see
this
as
a
punitive
type
set
of
language
in
accounting
terms
it's
spot
on,
and
thank
you
for
that,
mr
johnson,
so
I
would
ask
that
we
move
forward
with
closing
these
two
situations
out
and
then
ask
our
auditors
to
maybe
look
into
that
for
a
better
situation.
Mr
scott,
thank
you
better
resolution
should
I
say.
M
Three
questions,
the
first
being,
if
this
money's
repaid
back
to
us
is
that
general
fund
money
or
no.
B
We
would
be
talking
about
that.
We
used
part
of
it,
the
money
we
got
back
from
action
chicago
to
pay
for
some
emergency
things.
We
need
with
battery
backups
and
some
other
swipe
cards
and
all
of
those
types.
J
M
Next
question
is
based
on
your
comments
of
if
we
move
on
these
and
then
we
do
an
audit
and
find
out
if
they
potentially
are
repayable
and
maybe
not
be
bad-
that
we
may
be
able
to
recoup
some
of
that
money,
because
we've
forgave
this
loan
and
wrote
it
off
as
bad
debt.
We're
done.
We
don't
have
any
right
to
that
money
anymore
correct.
M
Would
it
make
more
sense
to
keep
those
open
do
an
audit?
If
there
is
money
there,
the
taxpayers
of
cankee
county
could
potentially
benefit
right.
I
I
would
just
be
concerned
that
an
audit
after
the
fact
useless-
and
you
know
entirely
useless
because.
B
B
M
Don't
we
don't
have
to
call
the
debts
in
I
just
I
I
I'm
based
on
mr
rose
comment
based
on
the
fact
that
we
are
not
in
the
greatest
financial
shape,
based
on
the
fact
this
money,
if
it
comes
back,
could
be
potentially
be
used
for
good
for
the
county.
I
think
writing
off
this
debt
at
this
time.
You
know
I
I
would
be
in
favor
of
doing
some
type
of
audit
on
both
of
them,
because
I
don't
think
you
can
do
just
one.
I
think
you
need
to
do
it
on
both.
B
M
I
Think
that
the
biggest
bargaining
chip
you
have
here
to
accomplish
that
audit
and
to
get
them
to
turn
over
the
documents
is
that
you're
willing
to
forgive
and
turn
it
into
a
grant
on
the
one
hand
or
forgive
it,
on
the
other
hand,
with
pembroke.
I
So
that's
a
big
bargaining
chip
we
have
if
we,
if
it's
approved
today,
if
these
resolutions
are
approved,
then
that
basically
takes
that
off
the
table
and,
like
you
said,
if
we
did
an
audit
and
it
uncovered
that
the
funds
weren't
used
appropriately,
it
really
limits
what
my
office
can
do
as
well
to
go
back
to
seek
recovery.
So
it's,
mr
victor
great,
to
see
the
audience.
Do
you
have
a
comment.
C
C
Situation-
and
we
just
did
the
150
000
grant
for
mechanic
street
out
of
that
cdap
fund.
So
I
I
I
would
just
call
a
question
and
let's,
let's
either
move
forward
or
reject
yeah.
B
The
question
has
been
called,
so
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
on
the
floor.
So
if
there's
something
that
needs
to
happen
after
the
question
is
called,
then
you
guys
obviously
so
choose
to
do
so.
Well,.
H
Just
a
point
of
order,
mr
chairman,
a
motion
to
when
the
question
is
called
that's
a
motion
to
end
debate
that
takes
two-thirds
vote
of
this
particular
committee
down
here
before
it
can
actually
go
and
then
even
calling
for
the
question,
I
think
shouldn't
prohibit
us
as
to
sending
it
back
to
committee
with
the
following
recommendations,
which
is
the
request
for
an
audit.
H
I
think
that
would
be
more
appropriate
because
just
to
call
for
the
question
without
a
two-thirds
vote
of
this
board
is
just
calling
for.
The
question
is
not
a
second
to
the
motion
or
whatever
and
right
now
with
phil.
But
I
would
entertain
a
motion
to
I
mean
I
would
do
an
amended
motion
to
wreck
to
submit
it
to
send
it
back
to
committee
with
the
following
recommendations,
and
that
recommendation
is
to
request
an
audit.
B
Yeah,
do
you
have
an
opinion
on
that?
Mr
rowe?
I
think
they
call
the
question.
We
call
the
question
it
ends
debate.
It
doesn't
require
a
two-thirds.
The
question
was
called
by
mr
vickery.
B
So
we
can
vote
on
this
and
you
could
turn
it
down
and
then
make
a
new
motion.
You
can
vote
to
approve
it
the
way
it
is
and
is
stated
in
the
language
or
it
can
be.
It
can't
be
a
combination
of
both.
Obviously
so,
and
this
is
just
on
moments.
This
is
not
on
both
you
understand,
but
you
want
to
make
sure
this
is
just
the
first
one
that
is
motioned
in
the
second
we've
already
ended.
We
yeah,
we
called
the
question
yeah.
It.
B
B
F
F
B
Motion
carries
now
moving
on
to
the
next
issue:
the
writing
off
of
the
revolving
loan
to
pembroke
township.
B
N
B
C
Victory.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman
yeah.
I
think
we
just
move
on.
There's
nothing
left.
We
fixed
the
roof,
trying
to
save
the
state
project
and
paid
the
bills
and
there's
no
money
coming
back.
There's
no
money!
There.
There's
no
paperwork,
call
a
question.
K
B
H
H
Do
we
have
any
guidelines,
policies
that
basically
make
that
determination
to
say
this
is
the
criteria
that
needs
to
be,
if
you
want
it
written
off,
or
this
is
the
criteria,
if
you
want
it
as
a
grant,
if
you
knew
when
you
extended
the
loan
that
there
was
no
real
collateral,
then
actually
it
should
have
been
a
grant,
and
so
therefore
we're
not
arguing
how
successful
or
unsuccessful
the
program
is.
H
What
we
are
arguing
is
the
language
that's
being
imputed
in
one
versus
the
other,
and
I
understand
the
subjective
argument
of
in
accounting
terminology,
but
again
that
would
weigh
to
what
policy
or
procedures
you
have
in
place
to
determine
one
or
the
other,
and
that
I
don't
see
in
front
of
me.
I
thought
the
audit
was
a
good
idea.
The
board
voted
down.
I
don't
want
the
county.
We
proceed
even
though
we're
giving
we're
about
to
end
this
program
as
just
giving
money
away
you
your
last
thing.
H
If,
if
us,
if
that's
all
we're
going
to
do,
then
it
should
be.
This
is
a
grant
program
before
those
individuals
that
cannot
secure
a
loan.
So
therefore
we're
going
to
call
it
a
grant
but
to
determine
whether
something
is
a
grant
or
a
write-off
or
whatever
would
lend
to
me
in
the
world
of
intelligence,
a
policy
that
decides
that.
So
that
way
I
have
some
type
of
outline
to
determine
which
one
could
apply
or
if
both
could
apply.
If
that
makes
sense,.
J
Thank
you
without
being
getting
too
technical
with
this
with
accounting,
we
have
to
present
fairly
financial
statements
if
this
was
a
grant.
That
was
our.
That
means
it's
our
determination
to
give
them
this
money
to
use.
However,
they
want.
We
can't
give
that
away,
because
there
are
no
assets
to
give
away.
We've
already
classified
this
as
a
loan.
At
this
point,
we've
made
the
determination
that
they're
uncollectible,
if
we
made
the
determination
that
they're
uncollectible
the
only
fair
way
to
present
this,
is
to
call
it
bad
debt,
which
is
what
it
is.
J
If
we
wanted
to
call
it
grant,
we
would
have
had
to
have
said
that
at
the
initial
transaction
in
the
transfer
of
assets,
but
we
can't
go
back
and
do
that
now.
As
for
the
audit
of
this,
which
I
understand
and
makes
sense
to
me,
I
guess
my
only
problem
with
that
is
if
the
determinations
are
even
made
by
the
people
involved,
that
there
is
no,
there
are
no
funds
to
collect.
J
Then
it
just
seems
like
a
bad
decision
for
the
board
to
spend
money,
to
have
an
audit
just
to
determine
that
there's
no
money
to
collect.
It's
obviously
very
frustrating
situation,
but
why
would
we
want
to
spend
money
more
money
just
to
determine
something
that
we
already
know?
I
guess
those
are
my
thoughts.
I
So
the
audit
could
be
conducted
in-house
by
the
county's
auditor.
So
certainly
there's
there's
some
time
involved
in
that,
but
there's
probably
no
hurry
here
to
forgive
this
loan
because
it
hasn't
been
repaid
in
so
long
just
to
address
some
of
the
comments
that
the
the
township
supervisors
are
no
longer
in
office.
The
documents
are
missing.
Well,
that's
because
the
last
two
have
been
indicted
and
convicted
for
fraud
involving
township
funds.
I
I
Some
of
the
members
have
said
that
those
dollars
were
used
solely
on
repairing
the
building
or
a
roof.
I'd
just
like
to
know
what
that
money
was
used
for,
and
there
were
legal
requirements
that
the
township
maintain
those
records,
and
I
want
to
see
that
before
we
write
off
the
debt
that
that
township
has
upheld
its
legal
duties
to
the
county.
I
B
I
very
much
appreciate
those
comments
because
we
have
the
ability
to
provide
that
that
latitude
for
mr
rose
office
after
obviously
mr
lee
looks
into
it
if,
in
fact,
there
was
some
things
that
were
inappropriate
to
be
able
to
act
on
those
as
best
as
offices
fit.
So
I
would
not
want
to
hamstring
that
effort
as
chairman
of
this
board,
but
obviously
this
group
can
decide
to
move
on
if
they
wish.
So
we
do
have
a
motion
in
a
second.
B
C
F
C
C
Mr
snipes
comments
would
be
great
at
the
beginning,
but
now
the
cdap
program's
ended.
I
mean
why
do
we
want
to
set
up
guidelines
for
loans
and
grants
at
the
end
of
the
program?
You
do
it
at
the
beginning,
okay
sure,
and
we
had
a
committee
we.
This
has
all
been
done
through
committee
for
over
the
years
and
we've
we
made
decisions
and
based
on
facts,
and
we
went
forward
with
those
decisions
so.
C
C
C
I
I
L
L
B
L
This
we
took
a
bus
tour.
We
went
through
the
building,
we
went
through
everything
with
the
people
involved
and
we
we
decided
at
that
time
that
it
was
perfectly
okay.
It
was.
It
was
legal
to
do
so.
There's
there's
nothing
underhanded
about
what
occurred
there.
There
was
other
funds
that
came
to
the
township
that
were
absconded
with,
but
not
these
funds
that
we
loaned
them.
There's
no
reason
for
us
to
continue
this.
B
H
What's
my
first
one
on
this
motion,
let's
kind
of
clear
up
something
here:
I'm
not
trying
to
go
back
into
what
happened
back
when
what
I
simply
asked
for
was
what
policy
or
procedures
we
have
in
place.
That
sets
the
guidelines
as
to
whether
we
forgive
something
or
as
far
as
or
determine
that
it's
a
grant
or
a
write-off.
Excuse
me.
So
we
we,
what
policies
or
procedures
do
we
have
in
place?
H
Certainly,
if
you
make
the
decision
you
have
to
have
some
type
of
guideline
or
policy
in
place
that
allows
you
to
determine
whether
one
would
be
a
grant
and
turn
into
a
grant
and
a
write-off,
and
the
other
I
mean
excuse
me
a
grant
and
the
other
a
write-off
I'm
not
interested
in
all
the
preliminaries
that
happen
back
forth.
What
I'm
saying
is
it's
the
county's
responsibility
that,
if
we're
going
to
start
saying
we're
going
to
grant
you
this
and
but
these
individuals
over
here
this
is
a
bad
debt
collection.
B
Thank
you.
Our
policies
and
our
procedures
are
the
finance
committee
and
the
determination
that
committee
made
on
sending
this
forward.
So
I
will
say
that,
and
also
I
will
I
will
listen
to
what
a
cpa
defines
as
those
terms
all
day
long
and
I
don't
I,
I
feel
no
malice
towards
what
happened.
I
understand
the
situation.
What
you're
saying
I
think
I'm
not
going
to
disparage
what
you
feel
because
there
I
understand
that.
B
That's
your
that's
your
feeling,
but
in
my
opinion,
if,
if
the
board
member
from
that
area
says
move
forward,
I
say
move
forward.
That's
the
way
I'm
gonna
vote.
Okay,
but
you
all
may
feel
a
different
way
so
that
that's
just
my
own
opinion
and
if
we
want
to
do
a
do
an
audit
okay,
then
we
can
do
an
audit.
B
G
F
L
That's
a
minimum
to
everybody
churning,
not.
B
G
I
don't
know
if
it's
old
or
new,
really
kind
of
maybe
on
behalf
of
the
board.
I'd
like
to
wish
wish
mr
bill
oltof
a
happy
birthday
as
he
heads
towards
the
finish
line.