►
From YouTube: Ethics Commission Meeting 7/11/2017
Description
Ethics Commission Meeting 7/11/2017 10:30AM
A
C
C
A
You
so
I'm
sitting
in
the
the
chair
right
now
just
to
get
things
rolling,
because
this
is
our
first
meeting.
We
have
some
things
to
determine.
I
will,
after
the
election
of
a
chairman,
gets
to
that
point
number
six
on
the
agenda.
I
will
step
aside
and
let
the
committee
do
its
business
to
start
off
with.
Is
there
any
public
comment?
D
Epic
committee
is
a
committee
that
is
well
needed
on
the
county
board.
We
had
it
some
time
ago
and
now
it's
being
brought
back
into
place
with
individuals
that
are
not
on
the
county
board
per
se,
but
throughout
the
community
or
wherever
I
was
elated.
When
I
was
arguing
you
know
who
do
we
have
in
the
legal
capacity?
D
And
then
I
had
this
name
in
my
mind,
and
I
saw
that
the
retired
judge
decided
to
come
out
of
retirement
into
community
service
and
thanking
him
and
tony
or
toby
ochesky
from
the
hero
or
whatever
minded
individual
and
all
the
others.
That's
on
the
board.
I
think
state
police
former
up
in
there
remember
dowsie
and
all
the
other
ones
back
in
there
when
I
work
for
the
state,
so
you
got
a
good
cross
board
here
or
whatever,
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
sleepless
nights.
D
No,
I'm
looking
forward
to
a
great
opportunity
for
the
public
to
have
a
vested
interest
in
seeing
the
ethics
committee
and
knowing
that
we
have
good
people
in
place
to
make
great
decisions
just
in
case
an
issue
has
to
come
up,
but
in
kankakee
county.
I
don't
think
that
will
be
the
case,
but
if
it
does,
we
got
good
people
and
good
places
to
make
good
decisions
thanks.
A
Moving
on
the
no
presentations
but
submission
of
affidavits
for
party
affiliation
for
for
informational
purposes,
we
have
two
here:
the
members
cannot
all
be
from
the
same
political
party.
It
doesn't
mean
that
they
they
can
be
independent,
it
doesn't
mean
they
can.
You
know,
have
to
declare
a
party,
they
can
be
independent,
but
they
just
all
can't
be
from
the
same
party.
So
do
we
have
those
declarations
and
are
they
in
order.
B
A
All
right
and
one
of
each
okay,
so
we're
good
pending
mr
daiki
is
not
here
today.
We
will
confirm
that
in
in
a
following
meeting,
if,
in
fact
the
ethics
commission
needs
to
meet,
but
we
they're
pre-screening
that
you
know
we,
we
don't
have
of
the
same
party.
Those
were
submitted
through
the
state's
attorney's
office,
so
moving
on,
we
have
to
determine
the
member
terms.
A
Part
of
this
is,
is
there
is
a
a
predefined
term
that
have
for
are
automatically
reappointed
unless
somebody
else
has
to
be
taken
off
or
for
some
other
reason
moved
out
of
the
area,
and
so
we
have
to
do
that
by
drawing
by
lot.
So
what
we'll
do
is
diane
will
have
each
of
the
members
present
pick
a
number
out
of
the
out
of
the
can,
so
to
speak,
it's
not
a
hat,
but
that
will
determine
their
term
it'll,
be
a
number
one
or
a
number
two,
and
then
from
that.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
E
F
C
F
F
Yes,
in
terms
of
what
you're
talking
about
today,
ideally
any
changes
to
the
current
ordinance
that
you'd
like
to
make
and
then
any
of
your
internal
policies
and
procedures
should
something
come
to
your
attention.
That's
ethically
questionable.
So
things
like
due
process
rights
or
what
the
rules
of
evidence
are.
That's
why
you
have
judge
when
someone
here
to
help
with
that
sort
of
internal
policy,
stuff.
C
C
B
F
B
I
do
because,
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting
you
may
have
people
that
come
in
that
have
comments
to
make
that
I
believe
you
need
to
get
at
the
beginning.
I
think
what
you
want
to
see
is
that,
if
we're
discussing
something
to,
let
them
have
the
public's
view
at
the
end
as
well.
I
don't
think
you
should
take
it
out
of
the
beginning.
C
F
C
F
That
any
complaint
would
go
to
the
ethics
advisor.
He
would
do
an
investigation
as
to
whether
that
would
be
appropriate
to
bring
to
your
attention
or
not
whether
that,
with
some
grounds
for
actually
having
a
complaint
and
you're
having
fun
yet.
Do
you
see
what
I'm
talking
about
yeah
I'm
going
off
of
memory
and
that's
probably
not
a
great
procedure.
So
what
you
have?
There
is
just
the
proposed
thing
from
my
office.
I'm
talking
about
our
current
current
one.
C
F
C
E
As
far
as
myself
conducted
an
investigation
as
to
one
whether
or
not
it's
something
within
our
purview
and
then
the
next
aspect
of
it
is
whether
or
not
there
is
something
there
that
we
should
pursue
further
okay
and
then
I
would
then
make
some
type
of
recommendation
to
the
commission
then
or
if
there's,
if
I
find
out
that
it's
not
something
that
we
should
handle,
if
there's
somebody
else
that
should
be
handling
it.
I
should
make
a
referral
to
that.
B
E
E
A
F
A
And
what
I
would
suggest
is
maybe
at
some
point
we
could
have
the
email
to
ethics
advisor
at
k3county.net.
Both
I
and
mr
rowe
get
a
copy
of
that
email
as
well.
So
we
know
everybody
knows
that
something
is
being
filed.
I
would
again
that's
just
a
suggestion
for
this
committee
to
consider,
but
I
think
you
need
that
light
of
day
to
know
that
there
is
something
before
the
ethics
commission,
you're.
F
Correctly,
okay,
I
mean
that
is
up
for
the
commission
to
determine
I'm
not
going
to
work,
I'm
not
going
to
sway
them
either
way
on
that
they
want
the
county
involvement
in
terms
of
at
least
knowledge.
I
have
no
problem
with
that,
but
if
they
don't
they
want
to
keep
it
in-house,
that's
also
their
purview.
C
E
But
an
investigation
is
being
conducted
right,
but
as
to
whether
or
not
it
goes
any
further
than
that
I
mean
that's,
probably
something
that
needs
to
be
decided.
If
you
know
if
an
investigation
is
being
conducted
by
myself
or
whoever's
in
this
position
along
with
that,
you
know,
do
we
want
state's
attorney's
office
and
county
board
chairman
at
that
time
to
be
notified,
I
mean
that's
the.
F
Because
also
keep
in
mind
both
county
administration
and
the
state's
attorney's
office
following
appropriate.
So
if
there
is
a
complaint
about
mr
wheeler
or
mr
rowe,
do
you
want
them
to
know
about
that
before
it
comes,
I'm
not
trying
to
say,
there's
anything
bad
about
either
office
currently,
but
that
is
something
that
this
commission,
so
something
to
consider.
B
B
C
C
A
E
B
C
E
Well,
I
guess
what
I
might
suggest
is
that
we
get
a
copy
of
the
existing
ordinance.
We
now
have
a
copy
of
the
proposed
ordinance,
and
you
know
the
commission's
gonna
have
to
sit
down
and
try
to
start
analyzing
and
and
trying
to
understand
the
the
steps
that
are
in
existence
now
and
the
steps
that
are
in
the
proposed
ordinance
when.
A
F
A
F
C
Well,
I
think
that's
why
mr
wenzelmann
judge
wenzelman
is
a
good
person
to
have,
because
you
can
make
the
initial
decision
based
on
your
knowledge
as
to
whether
or
not
the
information
needs
to
be
spread
out.
You
know
yeah
and
once
you
decide
that
it's
valid
for
the
commission
to
know,
then
you
can
let
us
know
as
to
whether
or
not
it
goes
to
the
state's
attorney
or
to
mr
wheeler.
B
C
G
I
think
if
it's
a,
maybe
one
distinction
is,
if
it's
a
violation
of
an
internal
county
policy
and
that's
something
certainly
that
my
office
doesn't
need
to
be
involved
in
unless
you
refer
it
to
me,
but
if
it
is
a
violation
of
a
state
statute,
if
the
judge
determines
that
there
was
a
crime
committed,
I
would
ask
that
that
be
forwarded
to
my
office
quickly.
This
is
as
soon
as
possible
after
you
receive
the
complaint,
because
we
then
take
actions
to
determine.
G
Do
we
have
a
conflict
if
we
have
a
conflict,
we
have
to
have
outside
counsel
brought
in
through
the
appellate
prosecutor's
office
and
and
that's
a
whole
other
process.
So
maybe
there's
a
distinction
there
between
a
violation
of
county
policy
or
some
administrative
function
versus
a
criminal
charge.
That's
something
for
the
commission
to
determine.
C
C
B
This
judge,
I
think
we
need
to
meet
as
a
group
as
a
commission
and
really
go
over
the
old
and
the
new
and
make
determination
what
we're
going
to
do.
If
we're
going
to
keep
the
old
we're
going
to
move
to
the
new
I
haven't,
read
the
old
I'll,
be
honest.
I
haven't
looked
at
it,
so
I
have
no
idea
what's
going
on
there,
but
and
what
changes
you
know
may
or
may
not
be
needed
if
we
approve
the
new,
so
I
think
that's
really.
B
E
F
A
B
My
recommendation
at
this
point
is,
I
think,
we're
doing
a
little
swimming
here
and
we
need
to
really
sit
down
and
see
if
we
can
get
to
the
shore.
We
need
to
have
a
meeting
of
the
commission
and
go
over
the
old
and
the
new
and
decide
what
we're
going
to
prove
and
not
approve
and
get
an
understanding
of.
What's
in
here
I
mean,
I
know
just
the
three
of
us
are
here
today,
but
mr
drake.
B
B
B
A
I
do
have
a
just
to
along
those
lines
and
chairman
the
coordinating
the
meeting
times.
That
will
be
something
if
you
will
work
with
diane
on,
because
we
she
has
to
be
available
for
minutes
of
this.
So
we
need
to
make
sure
that
if
it's
not
this
location,
it
could
be
the
second
floor
conference
room.
Maybe
we
I
think
we
do
want
it
here,
because
then
we
could
broadcast
it,
but
that's
up
to
you.
I
think
it's
important
part
of
ethics
to
do
it.
In
the
light
of
day,
I.
B
C
D
B
B
A
F
B
C
B
E
F
C
D
F
The
ordinance
is
just
for
a
kind
of
broad
discretion
in
terms
of
what
you
can
look
at.
What
your
powers
are.
Those
kind
of
things
right.
What
you
would
probably
look
into
in
more
detail
is
your
own
internal
policies.
For
what
happens,
if
you
know,
for
whatever
reason,
judge
wenzelman
fails,
he
can't
perform
his
duties
or
the
state's
attorney's
office
needs
to
be
involved
in
some
way.
F
B
F
A
A
Two,
it
did
make
it
in
that
copy
so
and
you
would
have
to
discuss
whether
we
want
to
adopt
that
and
then
bring
two
more
people
on
for
cases
of
quorum
and
having
more
people
involved.
So
that's
just
something
for
the
committee
to
consider
you
could
make
it
three
and
then
change
that
down
the
road.
So
I
just
noticed
that
in
the
current
yeah
proposal.