►
From YouTube: Executive Committee Meeting 04/27/2021
Description
Executive Committee Meeting 04/27/2021 9:00 AM
A
A
Those
opposed
same
sign,
miss
polk.
Is
that
an
eye
for
you?
I
just
want
to
note
the
zoom
call.
Yeah.
Okay,
just
want
to
make
sure,
because
we
have
to
note
that
for
the
record,
if
you're
on
zoom,
we
have
to
make
sure
we
ask
the
people
that
are
on
zoom,
specifically
not
calling
you
out
just
want
to
make
sure.
A
D
Any
questions
other
than
that
we
are
on
budget,
the
the
the
level
request
came
back
to
normal,
as
I
told
you
when
we
brought
everybody
back
back
it
shot
through
the
roof.
What
the
request
for
everything's
come
back
to
normal
we've
had
time
to
get
in
our
normal,
our
normal
run
of
things
we're
working
on,
as
I
told
you
before,
after
the
meetings
we
test,
hopefully
next
month,
I'll
be
able
to
get
jason
out
of
that
room
that
doesn't
affect
you
guys.
D
You
should
be
invisible
to
you,
but
that's
going
to
require
some
camera
upgradings,
we're
doing
that
in
budget.
Some
of
the
stuff
we'll
be
able
to
charge
to
covet
because
it's
related
to
the
zoom
issues,
and
the
one
thing
I
can
say
is
that
a
couple
months
ago
I
requested
that
you
consider
next
year
inc
adding
in
a
fiber
line
for
the
court
campus.
D
I
still
would
like
you
to
consider
that
if
the
budget
allows
next
year
or
the
year
after,
but
we
re
I've
rearranged,
some
of
our
lease
lines
that
connects
to
campuses
dropped
some
added
bandwidth
to
others,
so
now
they're
actually
coming
through
us.
So
they
have
the
amount
of
bandwidth
that
I
wanted
them
to
have
which
exceeds
their
demand.
I
would
still
like
you
to
consider
the
fiber
line
dedicated
for
the
courthouse,
so
we
have
failover
in
case
one
building
goes
down.
D
A
Anybody
have
any
questions
about
what
kevin
was
just
talking
about
the,
and
let
me
ask
you
this:
if,
in
fact,
we
do
end
up
upgrading
technology
with
video-
and
you
know
things
that
we're
talking
about
for
potentially
for
the
board
to
approve
as
far
as
upgrades
over
there,
we
could
only
see
more
data
needs.
I
guess
we're
not
we're
not
going
to
go
backwards
and
have
things
get.
D
D
They
need
the
lease
line
that
we
don't
control,
sure
right
now,
which
we're
never
going
to
drop,
that
the
sheriff
comes
through
it
too
so,
but
it
would
give
them
more
options
to
consider
when
they're
doing
video,
arraignment
or
anything
that
they
might
want
to
get.
You
know
a
service
somewhere
else
and
have
it
come
through
the
internet.
You
need
lots
of
bandwidth
for
sure.
A
E
E
E
In
the
last
month,
we
have
increased
that
to
the
53
266
total
doses,
giving
fully
vaccinated
we're
up
to
23
777.
As
of
yesterday,
which
is
an
increase
of
12
100..
So
we've
more
than
doubled
the
fully
vaccinated
individuals
in
our
county
that
raised
our
rate
from
in
one
month
from
10
and
a
half
to
21.25
percent.
E
E
So
I
I
am
pleased
to
see
that
obviously
last
week
with
not
only
the
national
guard
event
that
we
had
at
the
first
church
of
the
nazarene
in
kankakee
for
three
days
riverside
experienced
it
iroquois
county
experienced
it
with
the
national
guard
event
that
they
had
statewide
and
it
could
be
a
number
of
reasons,
but
maybe
largely
conducive
to
the
j
j
pause.
In
relation
to
that
situation,
we
saw
a
dramatic
decrease
in
the
number
of
people
that
were
in
line
for
a
shot.
E
It
could
be
that
there
was
some
concerns,
the
hesitancy
that
they
talk
about,
we're
not
sure
you
know
the
next
couple
of
weeks
might
give
us
a
better
picture
if
it's
a
trend
or
if
it
was
just
a
blip
and
and
now
that
johnson
johnson
is
open
back
up
again,
although
we
won't
be
receiving
any.
You
know
in
the
next
few
weeks
the
supplies
of
j
and
j.
E
You
know
on
social
media
in
the
paper
on
the
radio
is
that
you
know
pfizer
is,
is
approved
for
16
to
18
year
olds,
so
anyone
who's
interested
in
their.
You
know
high
schooler,
some
of
the
younger
teenagers
being
able
to
get
it.
They
can
moderna
and
j
j
right
now
are
still
approved
only
for
18
and
up
that
hasn't
changed,
and
we
don't
foresee
that
changing
necessarily,
I
think,
they're
looking
into
that,
but
those
studies
take
a
little
while
to
finally
get
approved
by
the
fda.
E
Last
saturday,
there
was
an
event
that
was
at
duane
dean
and
I
think
they
did
about
130
individuals
there
with
the
pfizer
this
friday,
the
naacp
jewel
osco,
the
health
department
amida
is
going
to
be
coordinating
an
event
at
morningstar
baptist
church.
I
believe
we
have
the
ability
to
do
300
vaccinations
there
they're
going
to
have.
I
think
it's
a
food
truck,
that's
going
to
be
handing
out
some
food
supplies
and
some
other
things
to
hopefully
get
interest
within
that
community.
That
neighborhood
and
anyone
again
that's
interested
in
the
pfizer
to
do
that.
E
E
You
know
trying
to
accommodate
maybe
some
late
hours
with
some
of
our
clinics
during
the
week
to
accommodate
the
you
know
the
working
people
who
can't
normally
get
away
during
the
week
because
they're
working,
maybe
if
we
have
a
couple
of
nights
where
we're
working
till
eight
or
something
like
that,
you
know,
then
they
could
they
could
come
in
and
again
we'll
monitor.
You
know
that
interest.
You
know
with
our
average
at
21.25
percent.
I
thought
we
were
going
to
go
and
I
expect
to
to
get
much
higher.
E
But
but
I
I
don't
know
you
know
the
the
two
counties
in
the
state
that
are
the
highest
have
kind
of
plateaued
at
around
32
to
35
percent
of
their
population
and
they
stormed
up
there
pretty
quick
to
the
30s
and
then
they've
sort
of
plateaued
out,
so
we'll
just
have
to
wait
and
see
if
that's
the
general
public's
interest
at
this
point
and
and
where
we
have
to
go
from
there.
Any
questions.
C
E
E
You
know
I
I
don't
personally,
but
they
can
track
that
social
media
can
track.
You
know
how
many
hits
I
know
you
know,
mr
hunter,
I
think
brought
it
up
a
couple
of
months
ago
with
that
town
hall,
you
know
they're
able
to
see
how
many
people
actually
watched
it,
how
many
times
it
gets
shared
comments
that
get
made
on
it,
and
things
like
that,
so
you
can
kind
of
get
a
footprint
you
know
for,
for
who
it
reach
reaches.
E
C
E
A
So
before
can
I
can
we
go
around
and
then,
if
you
have
a
second
time,
sure
or
other,
because
we're
trying
to
stick
with
the
accounting
rules,
that's
right.
The
one
one
question
I
had
was
the
vaccine
doesn't
mean
it's
not
gonna.
Stop
you
from
getting
coveted,
it's
it's
it's
so
it
doesn't
kill
you
pretty
much.
Is
that
that
that's.
E
Correct
that
is
the
school
of
thought.
Is
it
basically,
for
example,
pfizer
I
think,
is
about
96
efficient
efficacy.
They
call
it.
That
would
mean
you
have
a
four
percent
chance
of
still
getting
covered,
but
then
it's
supposed
to
reduce
your
severe
symptoms.
You
know
by
a
hundred
percent
and
death
by
a
hundred
percent.
So
yes,
okay,.
F
E
F
E
You're,
actually,
the
second
person
now
today
that
I've
heard
that
from
so
I
yeah
a
friend
of
mine
reached
out
to
let
me
know
this
morning
that
they
had
received
the
same
letter
that
they
have
received
their
second
shot.
I'm
a
county
employee.
I
love
working
for
the
county
of
kankakee
in
the
health
department.
E
I
would
just
say
that
working
alongside
the
state
mistakes
get
made.
So
I'm
sure
that's
just
an
error.
If
you
got
one,
if
my
friend
got
one
I'm
sure
there
are
a
lot
of
letters
out
there,
that
would
indicate
people
have
been
missed
now
why
that
is
we
can.
I
can
ask
and
reach
out
and
try
to
determine,
what's
what's
going
on
there,
but
if
you
know
you've
got
the
second
shot,
then
it's
just
one
of
those
things
where
you
can
disregard
that
letter.
You
don't
have
to
worry
about
it.
I.
H
Did
you
have
something
yeah
just
to
make
comment?
You
know
what
I
what
I
see
now
is
more
interface
and
more
collaboration
of
the
state
county,
local
entities,
the
religious
communities,
insurance
companies
et
cetera,
see
the
numbers
are
going
up
by
virtue
of
the
fact
that
people
are
starting
to
work
together.
H
I
think
collaboration
and
interface
are
the
optimal
words.
I'd
like
to
utilize
in
terms
of
what's
happening
about
our
numbers.
Going
up.
Churches
played
a
substantial
role
in
terms
of
providing
information
vaccines
regarding
what's
going
on,
and
you
know
I
I'm
the
vice
chairman
of
the
naacp
and
theodos,
and
I
probably
talk
10
times
a
day
about
different
stuff,
and
you
know
and
what
I
really
appreciate
that
I
saw
early
in
the
beginning
in
terms
of
testing
and
so
forth.
H
Thank
god
for
your
chairman,
up
there
interfacing
with
media
and
riverside
and
other
entities
and
in
the
health
department
as
well
too.
I've
seen
an
increase
of
activity,
john
in
terms
of
publicizing
the
marketing
shots
and
vaccines
and
locations
times
and
so
forth.
You
know
we
do
a
lot
of
that
within
double
aacp
on
social
media,
so
I
think
theodosius
I
think,
gets
off
on
that
that
stuff,
and
you
know
I
I
think
we
we're
not
doing
bad.
You
know
I.
H
I
felt
kind
of
bad
the
other
day,
though,
when
when
I
saw
the
story
that
that
on
kambic
but
yeah,
hey
things
happen
in
terms
of
the
johnson
and
johnson
vaccine
and
some
you
know,
maybe
that
reaffirmed
some
some
people's
hesitancy
to
to
take
the
vaccines.
But
you
know
death
has
impacted
this
county.
It's
and
impacted
me
personally
in
terms
of
my
family,
but
we're
gonna
get
there.
Somebody
just
asked
if
we're
gonna
get
the
up
to
40
50,
I
think
eventually
we
will,
but
it's
going
to
take
time.
I
Normally
I
wouldn't
touch
my
face,
but
I
do
that
probably
four
five,
eight
nine
ten
times
a
day
so
that
that
just
you
know
and
I'm
I'm
a
thinker,
not
a
not
a
scientist
or
anything
I'm
like
well,
maybe
we
could
be
spreading
it
because
we're
touching
our
face
all
day.
I'm
just
I
don't
know.
If
you've
looked
into
that
data,
sir-
and
I
will
wait
for
your
response
next
meeting-
you
can
research
that
or
we
could
talk
about
it
on
the
golf
course
sometime.
E
However,
in
in
regards
to
the
public
health
aspect
of
this
virus
and
any
virus,
you
know
the
things
that
we
started
doing
a
year
and
a
half
ago
with
the
social
distancing
which
included
wearing
a
mask
if
you're
up
close,
you
know
trying
to
stay
six
feet
apart
from
individuals,
washing
your
hands
staying
home
with
your
sick.
None
of
that
has
changed.
You
know
the
virus
is
mutating.
That's
what
these
variants
are?
E
E
A
breakthrough
case
is
somebody
who
is
fully
vaccinated
but
gets
coveted.
I
know
one
so
if
you've
got
pfizer,
for
example,
you're
a
96
chance
not
to
get
it,
but
that
means
you
have
a
4
chance
to
get
it
and,
as
you
interact
with
individuals
who
maybe
aren't
wearing
their
mask,
aren't
social
distancing
aren't
going
to
get
vaccinated
because
that's
their
right
and
they're
not
gonna.
E
E
I
haven't
either
actually,
when
you
go
to
cdc's
website,
the
statistics
are
very
low,
so
I
have
heard
one
or
two
stories
where
they
they
do
get
tested.
Individuals,
but
you
know.
Obviously
the
main
focus
right
now
is
is
testing
for
kovid.
There
are,
you
know,
there's
some
noroviruses
going
around
right
now
we're
getting
some
reports
of
that
at
the
health
department.
Things
do
go
on
besides
covid
a
norovirus,
though,
is
typically
a
virus.
That's
spread
either
through
fecal
or
oral.
So
that's
just
unhygienic
practices.
E
A
E
I
mean
we
did
see
a
tr,
you
know
a
tremendous
drop
with
the
schools
that
were
open
were
able
to
you
know,
get
through
an
entire
school
year
with
very
limited
number
of
illnesses.
In
regards
to
that,
you
know,
and-
and
you
know,
for
those
who
argue
that
the
kids
wouldn't
wear
the
masks
and
everything
like
that-
my
wife's,
a
teacher
she's
saying
yes,
they
are.
I
Yeah,
no,
they
are
wearing
the
mask
and-
and
I'm
just
thinking
when
is
that
gonna
change
you
know
and
when?
When
are
students,
gonna
get
to
go
to
school
and
see
their
teachers
face
and
those
kind
of
things
I
I
always
just
want
another
question
and
since
do
hospitals
get
special
reimbursement
for
covered
positive
cases
rather
than
flu
positive
cases.
I
don't
know.
A
J
A
I
apologize
john,
do
you
have
just
a
second?
I'm
sorry,
I
just
thought
of
something
and
I
apologize
to
interrupt.
This
is
relative
to
legislative,
we're
going
to
be
voting
on
a
legislative
agenda,
and
I
had
heard
that
there
was
a
bill
out
there
that
was
going
to
put
the
health
department
as
the
enforcement
agent
to
go
into
schools.
Have
you
heard
anything
about
this?
A
A
A
A
J
A
L
Hey
good
morning,
you
know
the
only
thing
that
is
not
on
last
month's
report
that
was
approved
by
my
board
is
that
on
may
6
veterans
treatment
court
will
have
two
veterans.
Graduating
court
is
at
2
30
on
thursdays
and
you're
all
invited.
So
if
you're
well,
you're
welcome
to
come
in
just
wear
your
mask,
obviously,
but
yeah
2
30
on
thursday
may
6th
so
other
than
that
things
are
going
well.
Thank
you.
L
M
L
Sure
the
midwest
shelters
for
homeless
veterans-
that's
in
the
aurora
area,
recently
received
a
grant
and
they
have
a
mobile
bus
or
big
van
really
that
they
bring
down
right
now.
They
are
just
featuring
personal
hygiene
type
products,
but
they
have
the
ability
they
actually
brought.
One
veteran
that
was
recently
housed
a
lamp
and
dishes
and
then
another
veteran
that
was
recently
housed.
They
brought
a
microwave
down
for
as
well
as
the
cleaning
supplies.
L
The
first
time
around
was
seven
or
nine.
I
can't
remember
it
was
under
10,
but
I
think
there
was
yeah
seven
of
us,
seven
veterans
out
there
that
came
and
picked
up
supplies
so
and
they
were
all
from
kankakee
county
iroquois
county
is
participating
in
this
also,
but
those
seven
were
all
from
kankakee
county.
Thank.
M
L
A
A
If
you
start
with
the
word
in
compliance
with
health
insurance,
portability,
accountability
act,
it's
basically
hipaa
things
that
we've
had
to
insert
in
here.
It's
very
basic:
it's
just
some
textual
changes
and
then
the
final
paragraph
on
the
first
page
in
compliance
with
hipaa.
That
was
the
other
thing
that
was
changed.
Everything
else
is
exactly
the
same
as
it
was
in
the
other
version.
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye.
No
for
the
record
miss
polk
voted.
I
and
those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
thank
you
that
was
easy.
Moving
on
some
reappointments.
Can
I
get
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
these.
If
we
could?
Mr
hunter,
mr
featherling,
it's
the
reappointment
of
edward
van
gernen
to
the
union
drainage
district
number
two.
A
Fire
protection,
district,
kathleen
curl
to
the
reddick
fire
protection
district
and
randy
myers
is
actually
a
reappointment
to
the
bourbon,
a
fire
protection
district,
the
appointment
of
robert
lowry
to
the
redick
fire
protection
district,
and
so
those
are
all
the
most
of
them
are
reappointments.
One
is
an
appointment.
Yes,
do
you
have
a
question.
M
A
I
B
A
Openings
there's
one
opening
on
all
of
the
following:
raymond
drainage,
district,
spring
creek,
drainage,
district,
canavan,
drainage,
district,
gar,
creek
drainage,
district,
little
beaver,
special
drainage,
district,
special
drainage,
district,
mini
creek
drainage,
district
momentum,
yellowhead
drainage,
district
kanke,
county
farmland,
assessment
review
committee
and
the
kenky
river
valley.
Forest
preserve
district
board.
A
All
right,
we
got
through
that,
so
new
business.
Let's
start
go
it's
the
discussion
and
adoption
of
our
legislative
agenda
the
the
packet
has
been
out.
I
believe
I
was
able
to
get
that
out
saturday,
because
I
had
some
last
minute
changes.
I
want
to
get
the
most
updated
bills
on
what
was
moving
forward
and
what
wasn't
now.
I
also
wanted
to.
I
also
checked
with
our
counties
associations
to
make
sure
that
we
had
their
position
statements
in
there.
A
So
for
the
first
time
I
think
we're
trying
to
push
something
forward
to
our
legislators
and
our
lobbyists
to
focus
on
and
because
they're
going
to
start.
Some
of
these
are
already
approved.
Others
have
to
be
reconciliation
bills
between
the
house
and
the
senate,
and
then
going
to
the
governor.
We
at
least
want
to
be
on
record
on
what
we're
supporting
and
opposing.
So
I
I
tried
to
out
of
4
000
bills
or
something
like
that.
This
is
kind
of
where
we're
at
things
that
that
would
potentially
impact
the
counties.
A
I
try
to
stay
in
that
area
and
not
really
go
into
what
other
things
that
may
or
may
not
impact
the
counties.
But
there
are
a
couple
in
here,
like
finger-printing,
law-abiding
citizens
for
to
apply
for
a
foid
card,
so
there's
some
things
in
there
that
I
would
actually
we're
going
to
talk
about
there
a
little
bit
outside
of
that,
but
it
affects
our
residents.
So
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
the
best
way
to
do
this,
because
this
is
first
time
we've
done
it,
but
I
don't
think
it
should
be
the
last.
A
A
If
there's
something
that
needs
to
be
pulled
out,
we
discuss
it
separately,
not
to
go
through.
We
can
go
through
each
one
and
we
could
stay
for
the
hour
and
a
half
to
do
it.
I
don't
that
doesn't
bother
me
at
all.
I'm
just
wondering
what
the
committee
wants
to
do
and
how
you
think
we
should
approach
it.
That's
why
I
tried
to
get
the
packet
out
in
a
lot
of
time,
so
people
could
read
this
and
if
they
had
a
problem
with
a
pose
or
support
to
be
able
to
voice
that.
C
A
Let
me
know
and
you'll
see
that
our
when
a
department
head
sends
something
to
us,
there's
nothing
in
there.
That
is,
we
oppose
what
they
support,
or
vice
versa,
we're
we're
tending
to
support
our
department
heads
there's
some
blanks
on
there,
where
I
I
just
don't
know
what
you're
what
you
would
want
to
do,
and
so
we
need
to
talk
about
those
specifically.
A
So
do
you
want
a
moment
to
look
it
over
to
see
if
there's
anything,
you
would
want
me
to
explain
more
or
why
don't
we
do
that?
Take
a
look
at
the
list
see
if
there's
something
we
want
to
pull
out
and
talk
about
and
then
we'll
maybe
take
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
part
of
this,
and
then
we
start
to
to
go
down
on
that
to
work
on
the
other
stuff.
A
A
So
that
part
is
a
very
big
deal
to
me.
That's
why
we're
elected
is
to
do
those
things
and
because
we
live
here
and
so
it's
I
think,
it's
beyond
control.
It's
also
an
attack
on
revenue
as
well.
So
that's
kind
of
those.
Those
are
some
things
that
we
could
talk
about
and
I
figured
we'd
get
into
some
of
these
in
the
meeting
the
full
meeting
but
yeah.
If
you
want
me
just
to
do
a
brief
overview
of
each
that
we're
on
consent
and
then,
if
there's
questions
we
can
go.
That
way.
A
Does
that
sound
good
I'll,
try
to
condense
it
to
a
few
sentences
about
each
one,
eight
questions
in
yeah,
sure,
okay,
because
I
tried
to
I
hope
I
got
this
right.
I
lined
them
up
in
order
is
the
way
they're
on
the
sheet
here
that
took
me
an
hour
just
to
figure
that
out
all
right,
so
senate
bill
1602
we're
recommending
opposition
to
that
very
strong
opposition
admins
the
county's
code.
A
It's
basically
just
like
I
said
it
gives
the
state
the
power
on
local
control,
of
citing
decisions
for
wind
and
solar,
very
strong
opposition
to
that
and
we're
not
alone.
I've
met
with
the
iroquois
county
board
chairman
I've
teared
from
chairman
all
over
southern
illinois
very
concerned
about
this
one.
A
lot
of
people
are,
and
so
was
delbert,
so
I
mentioned
also
that
he
he
recommended
that
we
oppose
this
pretty
strongly
the
reduction
in
lgdf
funding
that
was
part
of
the
governor's
budget,
and
basically,
that
is
the
sheet
hb.
A
It's
hb
315
and
senate
bill
509.
That
is
another
one.
You
know
we
they've
increased
state
income
tax,
but
they
keep
taking
bigger
chunks
of
it
away
from
us
and
so
that
that
further
attack
on
that
revenue
source
is
substantial
for
us.
So
I'm
you
know,
you
know
that
we
need
to
restore
that,
and
our
counties
associations
are
are
supporting
that
as
well.
Yes,
sir.
A
And
if
there's
an
amendment
after
this,
if
you
decide
that
hey,
you
know
what
we
don't
like
that,
let's
go
a
different
direction.
Someone
can
prose
an
amendment
to
remove
that
one
fair
enough,
I'm
just
trying
to
make
this
easier.
Second,
miss
weber,
okay,
we'll
get
into
discussion!
Thank
you
for
that.
A
Basically,
it's
it's
a
a
reduction
in
redundancy
this.
This
would
say
because
data
is
already
checking
on
one
level
of
those
internal
controls
and
everything.
Well,
this
they're
saying:
if
you
get
money
from
these
state
sources,
it's
already
gone
through
that
process.
So
why
did
you?
Why
should
you
have
to
do
it
again
and
that
was
sponsored
by
senator
sims
and
representative
hoffman
in
the
house?
So
we
support
that.
It's
a
it's!
An
extra
redundancy,
that's
unnecessary!
A
It's
already
done
once
you've
gone
through
data
from
the
state,
you've
already
gone
through
it,
so
the
next
one
I
have
here
is
house
bill
zero,
one,
six,
two!
It's
about
local
government
consolidation!
It
doesn't
force
consolidation.
It
says
each
unit
of
local
government
must
have
a
a
committee
to
to
look
at
redundancies
in
in
governmental
bodies,
and
municipalities
and
counties
are
exempt
from
this.
It's
all
of
the
other
taxing
bodies.
A
So
it's
those
you
know
road
districts
and
townships,
and
fire
protection
districts
and
all
they
would
have
to
get
together
to
at
least
talk
about.
Is
there
redundancy
here?
I
thought
that
that
was
in
the
counties
all
think
it's
a
good
idea
at
least
to
have
the
discussion,
and
that
doesn't
mean
they
have
to
do
anything
if
it
just
forces
them
to
have
a
formal
discussion
and
again
that
was
that's
recommended
by
both,
I
believe.
Well,
that
was
isako.
A
I
believe
that
supported
that
one
reapportionment
more
time
senate
bill
1666,
that's
something
that
is
important,
because
we
we
don't
know
when
we're
going
to
get
census
information.
So
we
would
support
that
giving
us
more
time
to
draw
the
new
maps
on
a
local
level,
remote
meeting
authority.
This
basically
codifies.
A
A
Sorry,
a
local
government
should
not
be
restricted
from
using
local
cure
funds
for
legitimate
purposes
that
arrive
following
an
arbitrary
statutory
deadline
and
that
defining
appropriate
expenditures
should
be
as
flexible
as
federal
law
and
not
further
restricted
by
state.
The
feds
came
up
with
the
rules
and
the
states
should
not
restrict
us
any
further
than
the
federal
rules
on
that
and
that
so
that's
another
support.
You
know
and
it
looks
pretty
bipartisan
as
far
as
that
support
as
well
in
the
house
and
the
senate.
A
It
looks
like
there's
multiple
bills
for
that
protection
for
local
governments
covet
transmission,
it's
basically
toward
immunity.
If
we're
open
for
business
and
and
we
need
to
be
have
toward
immunity,
if
somebody
gets
or
they
say,
they've
got
coveted
from
our
building
or
from
our
office,
and
that
really
extends
beyond
that.
But
it's
it's
really
focused
on
kova
transmission
right
now.
It's
it's
impossible
to
do
business
when
everybody's
at
risk.
A
So
you
know
that
that
in
the
first
months
when
this
hit
last
year,
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
anita
and
I
had
about
just
this
subject
in
the
state's
attorney's
office.
You
know
what
do
we
do?
You
know,
how
do
we
protect
people
when
we
still
have
to
give
services
and
people
still
can
come
in?
And
you
know
employees,
and
I
mean
it's
just
there
needs
to
be
that
immunity.
But
I
guess
at
some
point
that
ends
and
if
you're
acting
recklessly,
then
I
think
that
would
fall
outside
of
immunity,
so
protection.
A
So
that's
another
support
motor
fuel,
local
mft,
it
would
be
our
option
or
or
some
counties
in
illinois
can
have
their
own
mft
just
a
few.
We
can't-
and
this
is
just
asking
us
to
basically
be
like
everybody
else,
allowing
all
counties
to
raise.
Mft
to
improve
their
roads
and
bridges
if
the
state
and
the
feds
are
not
paying
their
end
of
things,
we
need
to
fix
our
local
roads
where's
that
money
come
from
you
know,
and
so
that's
that's
part
of
it.
If
it's
good
for
other
counties,
why
isn't
it
good
for
us?
A
You
know
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
at
with
a
lot
of
these
laws.
I've
noticed
in
the
state
of
illinois,
it's
like
they
pull
cook
county
out
like
it's
its
own
state
and
then
they're,
starting
to
look
at
dupage
and
kane
the
same
way
like
they
get
special
rules,
but
everybody
else
has
to
they're
on
a
you
know:
they're
not
as
special
as
they
are.
So
this
is
another
one.
A
We
have
we
do
have
a
horse
in
the
race
we're
the
ones
who
are
watching
out
for
the
taxpayer
dollars
and-
and
so
in
that
case,
it's
not
personal
or
anything
like
that-
it's
business,
we
we
need
to
be
at
that
table
and
we
have.
We
were
at
that
table
up
until
about
four
years
ago,
so
senate
bill
1738
township
objection
to
zoning
right
now.
I
believe
it
was
a
moment
here,
a
super
majority.
A
If,
if
some
board
members
may
not
know
that
the
mile
and
a
half
on
on
jurisdiction
and
things
like
that,
but
then
there's
also
townships,
can
object
and-
and
we
support
the
fact
that
it
would
be
a
simple
majority-
not
a
super
majority.
If
a
township
objects,
we
still
have
citing
authority,
we
shouldn't
require
a
super
majority
to
override
a
township's
objection,
and
so
that's
why,
as
county
board
members,
I'm
asking
for
that
support
and
the
associations
are
also
saying
that
as
well
we're
we
have
citing
authority,
that's
basically
it.
A
A
Well,
we
would
have
to
have
a
super
majority
board
override
that
objection
and
I
think
a
simple
majority
is
kind
of
the
way
that
the
democracy
works
in
that
aspect
so
and
if
you
want
to
pull
these
out
separately
and
vote
on
each
one,
please
let
me
know
we'll
do
so.
Where
are
we
at
here,
erroneous,
homestead,
exemptions
for
look
back
that
just
allows
us
if
somebody
was
taking
a
homestead
exemption
and
we
catch
them
in
it.
We
can't
do
anything
about
the
past.
This
allows
us
to
go
back.
A
So
if
somebody
is
nefariously
getting
homestead
exemptions,
which
has
happened
in
the
past,
I
can
tell
you
in
some
high
profile
cases
and
some
others,
where
somebody's
taking
two
homestead
exemptions
and
then
well
the
bullet's
out
of
the
gun.
Well
now
this
would
allow
us
to
do
a
look
back
and
go
back
and
get
that
money
for
the
taxpayers.
A
A
A
Basically,
currently,
the
the
the
county
boards
established
districts
into
units
consisting
of
near
500
voters
as
practicable,
but
not
under
any
circumstances
to
exceed
800
voters
if
they
have
more
than
600.
The
county
board
may
divide
the
precinct
into
election
precincts
blah
blah
blah.
The
proposed
change
basically
allows
us
to
up
that
amount
and
start
to
make
larger
voting
centers,
which
is,
if
you
look
at
what
goes
on
in
moments
where
you
got
all
those
townships
that
come
together,
and
you
know
what
I'm
talking
about.
A
We
could
consolidate
and
not
have
to
spend
so
much
on
election
judges
and
still
be
able
to
serve
the
public
in
a
in
a
manner,
that's
appropriate,
but
the
reason
that
there
are
voting
booths
within
three
blocks
of
each
other.
How
many
bones
like
three
or
four
or
four?
It's
just
a
huge
waste
of
money.
So
why
not
combine
into
larger
voting
centers?
Where
we
can?
You
know?
So?
That's
that's
part
of
it
as
not
to
disenfranchise
voters
as
well.
So
that's
one
there.
A
The
next
one
is
obviously
near
and
dear
to
our
heart.
The
duties
of
the
county
auditor,
the
the
basic
position
statement
and
the
thought
by
isako
as
county
board,
should
have
the
flexibility
to
decide
if
they
want
the
county
auditor
to
form
additional
duties
beyond
their
traditional
auditing
duties
and,
as
we
mentioned
before,
there's
nine
counties
in
illinois
that
have
this
bizarre
law.
A
That
says
the
auditor
is
also
the
accountant,
and
so
the
person
is
their
own
watchdog,
which,
by
data
and
by
federal
accounting
or
excuse
me
federal
auditing
standards,
is
the
biggest
no-no.
You
can
do
it's
a
lack
of
internal
controls.
If
everybody
has
that
same
thing,
this
is
basically
making
the
law
permissive.
If
the
county
wants
to
continue
that
way,
then
they
can
go
ahead,
but
if
they
get
over
750
000
a
year
or
they
get
any
grants
from
the
state
through
data,
all
that's
at
risk,
if
that
internal
control
is
violated.
A
So
that's
that's
our
been
our
position,
and
so
this
finally
is
sitting
there.
I
don't
know
if
it'll
move
forward,
but
I
think
you
know
I
think
I
know
where
this
board
stands:
senate
bill,
1899
utility
projects
and
additional
costs
if
there
are
additional
costs
that
are
associated
with
that,
you
have
90
days
to
remove,
relocate
or
modify
ditches
drains
blah
blah
blah
pipelines,
other
equipment
necessary
to
accommodate
a
highway
project.
A
The
law
not
presently
does
not
presently
allow
for
cost
recovery
for
expenses
resulting
from
the
state
or
county
highway
authority
needing
to
revise
their
project.
So
this
allows
us
to
get.
If
they
revise
the
project,
we
can
recoup
the
cost.
So
right
now
it's
it's
just!
Basically,
you
know
you
change,
it
now
pay
for
it.
So
that's
another
support.
A
A
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody's
on
the
same
list
change
corner
to
medical
examiner
in
each
county.
If
you
have
any
questions,
bob
is
here,
but
that's
basically
I
don't
know
how
many
emmys
are
in
the
whole
state,
but
you'd
have
to
combine
counties.
There's
there's
just
there's
no
way
to
operationalize
this.
That
I
see.
Do
you
have
any
comment
on
this
one
because
it
keeps
coming
up
over
and
over
again
bob
and
you
have
to
come
over
there.
P
Thank
you
and
thank
you
given
us
the
opportunity
to
review
some
of
this
legislation-
maya,
yes
yeah!
This
comes
up
quite
often
we're
lucky,
as
I
always
talk
to
you
about
we're
lucky
to
have
four
forensic
pathologists
in
kankakee
county,
which
is
just
unheard
of
there's
12
in
the
in
the
in
cook,
county
along
with
r4
and
then
plus,
I
think,
there's
a
total
of
22
to
24
in
the
state
of
illinois,
so
360
in
the
united
states
and
approximately
150
are
just
teachers.
P
So
if
this
happens
in
our
county
here,
that
would
probably
have
to
close
our
more
and
go
to
probably
cook
county
to
whenever
we
would
get
an
autopsy,
it
could
be
late
at
night.
You
know.
Basically,
this
is
something
we've
opposed
all
the
time
and
tried
to
and
been
down
to
springfield
on
this,
but
they
keep
bringing
it
back
and
back
and
forth
thinking
it's
going
to
do
a
little
better.
P
Also,
where
you
get
a
homicide
or
something
that
where
they're
going
to
have
to
attend
to
they're,
going
to
have
to
send
somebody
up
to
wherever
we
go,
we
used
to
go
to
grundy
county
years
ago,
when
I
first
started
for
all
of
our
homicides,
and
that
was
a
pain
and
you
know
what
to
get
everybody
together
to
get
over
there.
And
then
we
did
two
three
four
days
before
we
could
get
that
autopsy
done.
A
P
P
A
I'm
sure
most
do
on
the
county
official
side
now
senate
bill
1835
is
an
inquest
in
waiver.
A
piece
of
legislation
looks
like
it's
a
fee
change.
It
allows
the
fees
to
change.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
okay?
So
that's
just
we're
looking
to
support
that
to
allow
us
to
collect
more
fees,
which,
obviously
you
do
very
well
on
being
a
good
supporter.
P
Of
those
we
strongly
again
support
this
legislation.
Currently
we
get
about
30
000
a
year
which
would
bring
us
up
to
about
60,
000
and
well
you're.
Well,
I
bring
it
up
quite
often
of
what
we
use
this
for
we
have
used
approximately
over
the
years.
I've
been
well
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
that
we've
we've
put
into
without
putting
into
the
county
funds
at
all.
P
So
basically,
a
lot
of
my
cars
right
now
be
bought
out
of
the
corners
fees,
all
the
stuff,
that's
inside
the
morgue,
it's
the
only
you
can't
use
it
on
payroll
or
advance
somebody
or
pensions
and
stuff
like
that.
It
has
to
be
done
inside
the
more
more
equipment
and
and
who
who
goes
into
the
morgue
okay.
A
And
then
the
house
bill
3221
fentanyl
exposure.
Basically
it
says
it
becomes
a
class
ii
felony
for
recklessly
performing
an
act
or
acts
that
cause
a
first
responder
or
coroner
bodily
harm
as
a
result
or
exposure
or
contact
with
fentanyl,
so
that
that
is
that
a
good
explanation
of
that.
Absolutely
okay.
A
If
you
knowingly
do
these
things,
it's
not
accidental,
you
know
somebody
has
a
syringe
in
their
pocket
and
they've
overdosed.
Well
I
mean
they
didn't
knowingly
do
what
I
would
imagine
at
that
point,
but
if
they
they
would
hide
or
disclose
or
something
like
that
and
it
causes
you
harm
or
the
sheriff
for
his
deputies
harm.
Absolutely.
You
know.
Okay,
all
right.
P
Thing
I
don't
want
to
leave
because
of
you
probably
don't
have
in
your
package,
but
I've
been
all
over
social
media
with
this
house
bill
3447,
which,
which
appears
to
be
that
this
week,
that
the
house
representative
have
passed
this
bill,
which
means
currently,
apparently
what
we
have
is
any
any
procession
of
any
controlled
substance.
Is
a
felony
house
bill
3447,
seeks
to
reduce
the
possession
of
this
controlled
substance
to
a
class,
a
misdemeanor
yeah.
This
means
a
possession,
then
less
than
three
grams
of
cocaine
heroin.
P
P
A
P
H
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciate
it.
Thank
you,
then.
Moving
on
the
next
set
of
bills
are
well
it's
a
long
set,
but
springfield
has
been
hyper
focused
on
law
enforcement.
This
session,
to
say
the
least,
so
you
know
bob
bob,
the
kind
of
touched
on
one
thing
we're
going
to
get
to,
but
there's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
here.
So
the
first
one
that
I
have
on
the
list
is
house
bill,
1727,
it's
the
bad
apples
and
law
enforcement
accountability
act.
A
There
are
many
parts
of
this
that
could
be
good,
but
the
parts
that
are
awful
I
can't
get
past.
The
sheriff
has
asked
us
to
oppose.
I'm
suggesting
we
oppose
sheriff.
Is
there
anything
you
want
to
say
about
that?
Just
in
particular.
Just
is
there
any
specific
part
that
we
should
all
be
concerned
with.
Q
This
is
really
just
another
way
to
get
around
qualified
immunity.
I
mean
it's
it's
what
they're
trying
to
do,
and
it
will
continue,
I
mean
they
won't
stop
till
they
being.
The
legislators
won't
stop
until
they
eliminate
qualified
immunity
for
police
officers,
which
at
some
point
will
drive
every
qualified
police
officer
into
doing
something
else.
Maybe
that's
what
they
want,
but
you
can't
ask
police
officers
to
go
out
and
make
split-second
life-saving
life-threatening
decisions
and
not
be
covered.
A
That
was
the
one
thing
that
I
put
on
the
list
did
whatever
else
is
in
there.
Qualified
immunity
is
a
non-starter
for
me,
removing
that,
because
no
one
will
work
the
job
they're
already
having
a
tough
time.
So
unless
you
want
to
pull
that
out,
talk
about
it
separately,
that
that
would
be
an
opposition,
local
government,
residential
inspection.
A
That
was
something
that
I
believe
yeah
dell
had
sent
me
that
do
you
want
to
speak
to
that
dell,
real,
quick,
just
I'll?
Let
you
cut
to
it,
but
it's
basically,
you
know
we
we
we,
you
know
what
he
does.
We
have
to
be
able
to
go
on
and
inspect
things,
and
if
we
see
somebody
building
something
or
something
tore
up,
you
know
they
they
have
to
find
out.
What's
going
on.
R
R
Therefore,
we
do.
A
lot
of
our
inspections
are
just
drive-by
inspections
just
to
see
if
there's
a
problem,
that's
still
an
inspection
that
says
we
cannot
do
an
inspection
without
the
owner
or
occupants
permission.
Unless
we
have
a
court
order
or
a
warrant,
it
really
ties
our
hands
in
a
lot
of
situations.
R
A
A
It's
a
grant
made
basically
support,
ask,
and
I
think
it's
so
we
we
should
get
full
reimbursements
for
those
grand
a
positions
or
the
newer,
the
basic
services
and
new
or
expanded
services,
so
that
that's
pretty
easy.
You
know
we,
if
they're
going
to
ask
us
to
need
us
to
do
things
like
if
they
currently
have
grant
nade,
they
need
to
expand
that
grant
need
because
that's
how
probation
is
paid
for
80.
K
Good
morning,
everyone
actually
the
rhsp
program.
I
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with
that.
Currently
it's
a
nine
dollar
fee.
Every
person
pays
on
any
recorded
document
related
to
real
estate.
So
if
a
deed,
a
mortgage,
a
release,
a
lien,
well,
no,
not
leans
municipal
liens,
but
other
lanes
so
anything
related
to
real
estate.
You
pay
nine
dollars,
then
nine
dollars
goes
to
the
department
of
revenue.
K
K
I
think
it
is
a
good
program,
but
I
think
it
could
be
a
better
program
and
we
asked
for
this
two
years
ago
we're
asking
for
it
again
we're
asking
for
a
task
force
today
to
work
on
this
program
to
identify
the
need
or
not
for
an
increase.
They
want
to
double
this
amount
to
18,
with
really
no
oversight.
K
It's
because
cook
county
is
asking
for
more
money,
now
they're,
getting
a
huge
amount
of
money,
as
everyone
in
the
state
of
illinois
currently
is
various
entities,
government
programming
and
such
but
rental
housing
support
foreclosure
support.
All
that
is
getting
a
lot
of
money
from
the
federal
government.
On
top
of
that,
they
want
this
double.
So
we
and
we've
asked
for
accountability
since
I
took
office
in
2008
and
never
received
it.
This
program
went
into
effect
in
2005..
K
We
estimate
there's
about
17
million
dollars
collected
by
the
calculations
we
get
from
our
our
partnering
clerk
recorders
in
the
state
of
illinois
they're,
looking
at
34
million
dollars
for
a
fund
that
we
have
no
accountability
for
we're
asking
for
accountability
before
we
go
forward
with
this
increase,
so
it
passed
in
the
house,
it
passed
with
an
understanding,
we'll
get
a
task
force.
Now
that
will
dissolve
in
two
years.
K
We
are
hoping
to
go
to
the
senate
and
work
with
our
senate
partners
now
to
just
kill
this
bill.
So
on
behalf
of
the
county,
I
think
you
want
more
oversight
and
direction
as
to
where
these
dollars
are
going.
Yes,
it
is
helping
kankakee
county,
don't
get
me
wrong.
I've
talked
with
the
housing
authority,
but
I
think
this
program
could
be
way
better
and
help
a
lot
more
people
and
that's
what
we
need
to
do.
K
K
Well,
no,
I'm
sorry
not
give
us
they're
giving
us
the
ability.
We
can
charge
a
dollar
more,
that's
what
it
is.
So
they
still
keep
keep
the
whole
eighteen
dollars
yeah.
So
then
we
no
we're
not
gonna.
Do
that.
So
we
just.
We
just
need
better
oversight
on
this
and
help
our
constituents.
We've
asked
that
at
least
six
of
the
nine
stay
in
kankakee
county
and
we
help
our
own
constituents
and
they
totally
were
against
that.
K
A
A
N
N
A
You
got
to
get
jobs,
you
got,
then
you
can
get
roads
and
you
can
get
other
things
that
you
need
done.
Yeah
perfect.
Thank
you
house,
bill.
1595
is
a
support,
basically
saying
that
you
know
their
needs.
When
you
vote
for
a
chair
and
vice
chair,
it
needs
to
be
a
majority
of
the
board,
not
just
a
majority
of
those
present.
A
So
in
our
case
it
would
be.
15
is
the
number
that's
the
only
change,
and
that
has
pretty
much
unanimous
support.
I
don't
know
most
most
of
the
time
everybody's
at
that
meeting,
but
I
guess
there's
maybe
some
counties
they're,
not
you
know
they
don't
have
them.
You
know
the
the
majority
of
available
to
vote.
So,
let's
see
here.
A
House
bill
3617
mental
health
and
commitment.
That
is
a
support
recommendation.
It's
basically
saying
it
amends.
The
mental
health
and
developmental
disabilities
code
provides
that
the
circuit
court
has
jurisdiction
under
the
admission
transfer
and
discharge
procedures
for
the
mentally
ill.
Basically,
it's
it.
It
doesn't
give
control
to
the
courts
subject
to
involuntary
admission
on
an
inpatient
basis,
subject
to
involuntary
admission,
an
outpatient
in
need
of
treatment
involving
the
administration
of
psychotropic
medication
and
electroconvulsive
therapy
deletes
provision
that
limits
jurisdiction
to
persons
not
charged
with
a
felony
yeah.
A
That's
a
big
part
of
this
provides
that,
except,
as
provided
as
fitness
for
trial
to
plead
or
to
be
sentenced
article,
the
code
criminal
procedure
act
of
63,
no
respondent
who
has
pending
felony
charges,
may
be
ordered
to
undergo
a
program
of
hospitalization
in
a
mental
health
facility
operated
by
the
department
of
services
under
the
you
know.
This
is
from
the
the
sheriff
had
asked
us
to
support
this
as
part
of
his
association,
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
anything
else
there,
but
it
it's.
A
A
I
apologize
and
I've
got
some
things
incorrectly,
I'm
going
forward
here,
I
want
to
mention
in
a
second.
These
are
all
opposes
modifies.
The
allocation
of
monies
from
the
cannabis
regulation
fund
provides
that
four
percent-
currently
it's
eight
percent
of
the
specified
money-
shall
be
transferred
to
the
lgdf
book
government
distributive
fund.
Yes,.
A
Reducing
recidivism
and
running
deeper
into
criminal
involvement
amends
the
juvenile
court
act
of
1987
provides
in
this
article
concerning
delinquent
minors,
that,
on
or
after
january,
1st
of
22,
a
delinquent
minor
includes
a
minor
who,
prior
to
his
or
her
19th
birthday,
has
violated
or
attempted
to
violate,
regardless
of
where
the
act
occurred.
Federal
law,
blah
blah
blah.
So
this
do
you
have
any
comment
on
this
one.
Why
I
have
it?
This
is
a
pose
as
well.
I
and
I
had
support
on
it.
A
A
And
realize
all
of
the
the
support
services
that
we
have
to
offer
that
are
very
expensive
and
the
transport
that
we
have
to
take
people
out
of
the
county,
it's
going
to
be
substantial
and
when
they
change
this,
that
they're
not
going
to
fund
that
you
know
so
when
they
change
the
law.
They're
not
going
to
give
us
more
money.
Based
on
that,
if
you
were
just
throwing
a
number
out
there,
I
won't
hold
you
to
it
mike
how
much
of
the
population
is
18
to
19
years
old.
Q
A
J
A
A
So
if
you
want,
I
can
just
scratch
that
for
now
and
we
can
bring
it
up
at
the
full
board
and
then
not
put
it
on
the
list.
I
was
hoping
the
sheriff
had
a
better
explanation
because
I
definitely
did,
but
in
this
one
yeah.
Okay,
let
me
circle
that
one
as
far
as
bringing
it
back
to
talk
about
it
separately,
house,
bill,
15
or
excuse
me
1952.
A
Here
this
is
the
juvenile
cannabis
expungement.
This
is
a
pose.
It
looks
like
that
from
what
I
could
tell
from
reading
this,
that
if
you
were
juvenile-
and
you
committed,
you
know,
moving
substantial
weight,
you
know
doing
things
that
are
against
even
the
the
cannabis
laws
as
they
exist.
Now
it's
automatically
expunged
on
your
birthday.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct.
Q
Q
A
So
is
there
a
feeling?
This
is
one
that
we
would
have
to
vote
on
to
because
I
don't
have
it
any
oppose
or
support
here
you
know.
I
I'm
just
wondering
what
the
what
the
committee's
feelings
are
in
this
oppose.
There
need
to
be
a
motion
and
we'll
have
to
vote
on
it
just
because
it'll
be
to
add
it
to
the
consent
motion
here
in
a
second,
mr
long,
a
second
from
mr
hess
any
comment.
A
A
All
right
now
we're
on
to
corrections
apologize,
I'm
trying
to
make
sure
I'm
still
lined
up
here.
No
person
serving
a
term
of
natural
life
in
prison
may
be
paroled
or
released,
except
through
executive.
Clemency
that
would
be
deleted,
provides
that
a
person
serving
a
term
of
natural
life
imprisonment
is
eligible
for
parole.
A
Families
should
be
notified
in
a
timely
manner
and
provide
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
hearing
patrol
here
or
excuse
me,
parole
hearing
in
accordance
with
the
rights
of
victim
crime,
victims
and
witnesses,
act,
open,
parole,
hearings,
act
and
the
code
is
there.
Is
there
anything
on
that
that
you'd
like
to
speak
to
mike.
Q
A
A
Q
Q
A
Illinois
is
the
worst
state
in
the
united
states,
worse
than
washington,
d.c
on
the
funding
for
mental
health,
mental
health,
yes,
and
now
they're
putting
more
requirements
and
paying
less.
So
as
we
as
a
board.
We're
going
to
be
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
mental
health
and
substance
abuse
as
we
start
going
forward
in
those
covet
conversations.
But
this
is
something
that,
on
the
surface
is
is
something
we
should
support,
but
it
has
to
be
paid
for
how
is
it
going
to
be
paid
for?
A
Well,
it's
going
to
fall,
and
in
this
case
I
really
can't
say
that
it
that
it's
not
going
to
fall
right
to
the
people
using
the
service,
because
they're
just
going
to
charge
more
for
ambulance,
rides
they're
going
to
charge.
You
know
if
they've
got
all
this
cost
and
everything
they've
got
to
do
it's
going
to
go
to
insurance
companies
and
that's
higher
rates
for
all
of
us
or
it's
going
to
go
to
the
person
who's
being
taken
to
the
hospital,
and
sometimes
they
can
pay,
and
sometimes
they
can
so.
A
A
Q
A
A
G
S
S
J
J
So
I
guess
where
I
would
want
to
know
is
if
those
who
have
a
risk
for
minor
amounts.
We
certainly
know
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion,
suggesting
our
jails
are
overfilled
with
people
who
have
been
convicted
of
cannabis
crimes
and,
of
course,
obviously
it's
a
judgment,
whether
it's
an
overfill
or
not.
J
So
I'm
a
little
bit
mixed
on
this
one.
I
think
from
what
I'm
hearing,
because
it
includes
the
the
manufacturing
production
in
here,
I'm
less
inclined
to
say
we
I'm
inclined
to
continue
with
the
the
oppose
that
the
sheriff
has,
but
I
it
sounds
like
there's
something
that
could
be
done
here.
That
would
be
recognizing
what
may
be
an
issue
where
we
we
need
to,
as
elected
officials,
review
what
has
been
done
in
the
past.
A
Q
I
don't
believe
so
yeah
and
I
can
tell
you
that
we
are
receiving
expungements
from
the
court
almost
daily
for
things
a
hell
of
a
lot
more
serious
than
marijuana
sure.
So
they
have
that
opportunity
to
go
to
court
and
get
you
know.
But
again,
this
is
something
that
god
forbid.
Somebody
takes
their
own
responsibility
to
go,
handle
this
stuff.
They
want
the
government
to
do
it.
Foreign.
A
A
A
That
specified
persons
and
entities
shall
require
suicide
prevention,
counselors
on
the
person
or
entity
staff
to
perform
specified
suicide
prevention
services,
so
they're
mandating.
We
go
hire
people
basically
and
then
what
capacity?
If
that's
gonna,
be
health
department
or
whatever
else,
but
without
sending
any
funding
to
do
it?
How
do
you
pay
for
it?
So
I
think
that
was
that
opposition
and
your
thoughts
on
that
questions
re-entry
into
the
workforce.
A
That
was
also
an
oppose,
provides
the
securing
all
futures
of
equitable
reinvestment
tax
credit
pilot
program.
Wow,
it's
got
to
be
an
acronym
s-a-f-e-r,
no
doesn't
make
any
sense
provides
that
an
applicant
that
hires
certain
formerly
incarcerated
individuals
during
the
incentive
period
may
apply
for
a
tax
credit
against
the
applicants.
Withholding
tax
liability
provides
that
the
savings
from
the
changes
made
to
the
unified
code
of
corrections
shall
be
deposited,
securing
all
into
this
safer
communities
fund
for
the
purpose
of
funding
the
program.
A
A
O
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Q
Q
Drugs,
mr
gessner
obviously
talked
about
this
earlier
and
and
we
in
law
enforcement
are
opposed
as
well
to
this
basically
reducing
the
possession
of
of
those
drugs,
cocaine,
meth
heroin
to
a
class,
a
misdemeanor
and,
as
bob
mentioned,
the
the
number
of
deaths
and
the
number
of
saves
that
that
this
population,
our
world,
will
never
know
out
there
with
people
who
may
already
have
narcan
who
save
somebody.
We
don't
know
those
we
know
of
the
police
and
the
fire
and
the
ambulances
when
they
do
it
and
the
hospitals.
A
A
Q
Well,
I
I
I
guess
I
would
ask
the
legislature
what
they
mean
by
isolated
confinement.
Do
we
have
people
who
are
in
disciplinary
segregation
who
are
in
a
housing
unit
with
other
individuals,
but
they
are
in
their
own
cell,
so
technically
they're
not
isolated,
so
I
I
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
they
mean
by
that.
If
they
mean
you
know
what
you
see
on
tv,
where
they
put
you
out
out
in
a
separate
area
all
by
yourself
in
a
four
by
four
little
day
in
the
morning.
A
A
So
there
it
seems
to
me
they're,
basically
saying
a
young
adult
who's
under
26,
which
they
can
still
be
on
your
insurance
by
the
way
yeah,
so
that
that
that's
but
you're
for
some
parts
of
the
the
our
society
you're
an
adult
when
you're
18.
other
other
ones,
you're
20,
when
you're
21
and
then
other
times
when
you're
26
and
it
seems
very
situational.
A
When
do
you
become
an
adult
when
you
start
acting
like
one?
Maybe
I
don't
know,
but
it's
just
a
thought.
Some
of
us
are
still
waiting
anyway.
So
is
that
pretty
much
where
you're
at
on
that
mike
yeah
yeah
criminal
unfit
defendant
treatment
didn't
make
it
out
of
committee?
Okay,
mandatory
supervised
release.
Q
A
A
T
Q
A
And
has
yeah
so
that
that
was
an
opposition
as
well
to
be.
You
know,
cognizant
of
the
fact
that
the
the
services
that
are
involved
in
juvenile
detention
are
far
greater
than
adult
detention
and
and
those
those
kids,
if
you
will
will
have,
will
have
access
to
those
services
where
they
may
not
even
have
them
at
home.
A
B
A
Q
Rate
that
they
give
community
service,
for,
in
other
words,
I
think
there
is
a
statutorily
set
number
that
you
can
give
credit
for
community
service
work
based
on
some
offense
that
you
committed,
I
think,
they're
looking.
It
deletes
the
language
that
one
hour
shall
be
equivalent
to
four
four
dollars
of
the
assessment.
A
So
so,
whether
it's
you
know
for
two
weeks
or
instead
of
you,
know
to
pay
the
fine
right
all
right
and
let's
see,
senate
bill
667,
which
is
something
we
should
all
be
concerned
with.
It's
law
enforcement
immigration.
It's
very
I
copy
and
pasted
the
section
on
here
that
was
problematic,
but
sheriff
do
you
want
to
speak
to
that?
One.
Q
However,
senate
bill
667
adds
to
the
trust
act
and
now,
if
this
bill
passes,
will
not
allow
law
enforcement,
local
law
enforcement
to
even
converse
with
ice,
not
even
have
a
conversation,
and
then,
as
of
I
believe
january
of
2022,
says
that,
even
though
we
have
a
contract
with
the
marshals
that
we
cannot
have
that
ice
rider
on
that
contract,
so
we
would
not
be
able
to
house
for
ice
in
detention
now
those
individuals.
If
that
happens,
I
mean
those
individuals
are
going
to
be
housed
somewhere,
it'll
just
be
in
another
state.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
So
you
know-
and
I
don't
know
yeah,
I'm
not
a
lawyer-
never
pretend
to
be
one.
I
just
talked
to
a
lot
of
them
and
I
mentioned
to
the
sheriff.
I
thought
that
there
was
a
clear
infringement
on
the
interstate
commerce
clause,
that
the
federal
government
or
the
state
government
cannot
restrict
interstate
commerce
and,
in
this
case,
we're
renting
a
bed
we're
renting
a
space
and
they're
purchasing
a
space.
A
That's
interstate
commerce,
in
my
estimation,
but
I'm
not
a
lawyer,
so
I
don't
I'm
just
letting
you
know
that
if
this
happens,
I
may
be
coming
back.
You
do
you
say:
do
we
want
to
file
something
in
federal
court,
because
the
states
don't
have
the
power
to
do
what
they're
trying
to
do
now
and
I'm
not
trying
to
make
a
test
case?
I
don't
want
to
be
famous.
I
don't
want
none
of
that.
What
I'm
saying
is,
is,
I
think,
they've
way
overreached
in
this
aspect
so
but
we'll
see
how
that
goes.
A
A
B
A
So
it
basically
says
if
it
looks
like
to
me
that
if
somebody
is
asserting
charges
of
criminality
and
the
the
official
that
takes
that
charge,
if
you
will,
that
assertion
has
to
provide
written
record
of
why
they're
not
charging
somebody.
Is
that
what
I'm
reading
yeah
it
can't
be
because
there's
not
you
just
can't
say
there
is
no
offense
that
we
feel
is.
A
A
A
A
2122,
it's
bait
to
me
when
I
read
this
the
first
time
it
said,
even
if
your
custodial
parent
is
there
it's
inadmissible.
If
you
were
under
18
made
as
a
result
of
custodial
interrogation
conducted
at
a
police
station
shall
be
presumed
to
be
immiscible
as
evidence
in
a
criminal
proceeding
or
a
juvenile
court
proceeding.
A
So
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
context
on
that,
but
the
way
it
reads
to
me
was
was
disturbing
frankly
yeah,
so
it
it
that's.
The
way
it
reads
is
the
way
it
is
yep.
Okay,
so
I
I
would
say
that
we
should
stick
with
opposition.
Is
there
any
other
thoughts
along
those
lines
and
then
the
drug
court?
The
final
one
I
know
everybody's,
like
yay
drug
court
treatment
eligible.
This
is
a
recommendation
to
oppose.
We
have
down,
as
opposed
includes
in
the
definition
when
we
get
that.
A
Basically,
it's
decriminalizing
eliminates
a
provision
that
the
defendant
may
be
admitted
to
a
drug
court
program
only
upon
the
agreement
of
the
prosecutor.
If
the
defendant
is
charged
with
a
class
ii
or
greater
violation
of
various
manufacturing
delivery,
trafficking,
drug
conspiracy
violations,
cannabis
control,
act,
illinois,
controlled
substance,
act,
methamphetamine
control
and
community
protection
act
or
two,
the
defendant
is
previously
on
three
or
more
occasions,
either
completed
a
drug
court
program.
A
A
M
A
Does
that
make
sense?
There's
a
whole
different
discussion
here,
licensed
breeders,
people
that
ethically
do
their
job
exactly
yeah
yeah!
That's
that's
specifically
in
the
bill,
it's
different!
So
but
you
can't
just
say:
you're
you're
a
breeder
or
you
know,
you've
got
all
these
dogs
when
you
haven't
gone
through
that
process
and
the
annual
inspections.
A
So
we'll
do
a
voice
vote.
All
those
in
favor
of
supporting
house
bill,
1711,
say
hi.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
misspoke
voted.
I
unzoom.
Let's
see
here,
I
had
one
here.
Let
me
let
me
get
real
quick
this
one
here
I
spoke
to
it
earlier
and
then
kelly
found
it.
That's
what
we
were
looking
on
on
her
phone
over.
There
was
house
bill,
2789.
A
A
A
Right,
so
do
you?
Basically
we
don't
need
school
boards
anymore.
We
don't
need
any
local
elections,
I
mean
they
just
want.
They
want
to
take
everything
at
the
state
because
they
know
what's
best
for
us
and
decriminalize
it
all
sorry,
you
can
sense
the
sarcasm,
but
over
and
over
again
we
just
see
this
and
the
things
they
let
us
keep
through
their
own.
You
know
good
nature,
they
don't
pay
for
so
it
kind
of
puts
us
in
a
vice,
because
then
the
programs
that
we
want
to
do
that
are
helping.
A
People
tend
to
go
by
the
wayside,
because
we
have
to
cover
what
the
state
won't
pay.
For
I
mean
that's
just
it's
it's
a
scale,
and
it
did.
I
mean
it's
in
order
for
it
to
balance
we've
both
got
to
be
there.
It
seems
like
that
scale
is
just
it's
turned
into
a
funnel.
That's
thrown
everything
our
direction,
so
boys
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
hi,
miss
polk,
voted
I
as
well.
All
those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
to
oppose
all
right
now.
A
I
have
two
proclamations,
one
for
motorcycle
awareness
month
and
they're,
one
for
national,
safe
voting
week,
motion
to
combine
and
approve
mr
hess,
I'm
sorry.
Oh
we've
got
to
vote
all
the
other
ones.
I
apologize
yeah.
So
this
is
for
everything
else.
That
was
consent.
If
you
will
that
that
we
had
on
the
list
that
was
support
or
opposed
beyond
the
ones
that
we
did
a
votes
on
individually.
Is
there
a
motion?
A
A
The
other
thing
I
want
to
mention
as
far
as
this,
usually
I
go
before
the
board
with
letters
of
support.
I
put
this
in
your
packet.
This
was
very
fast
moving.
I
got
these
these
letters
or
the
requests
from
congresswoman
kelly's
office,
we're
trying
to
get
brookmont
boulevard
done
the
the
viaduct
and
that's
a
big
problem,
and
so
they're
trying
to
get
it
into
the
transportation
bill.
So
since
we
weren't
spending
our
money,
I
thought
I
had
it
was
okay.
A
I
just
want
to
mention
that
as
a
head
nod,
is
it
okay
that
I
did
that
we
support
them
doing
this
project,
but
it's
a
lit.
I
didn't
have
time
it
had
to
be
there
by
monday.
If
we
were
spending
money,
I
would
have
waited
and
got
your
opinions
and
ability
to
or
support
in
doing
that,
moving
on.
So
we
have
the
motorcycle
awareness
month,
the
national
safe
boating
week.
Is
there
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
those
for
the
full
board?
Mr
carrick?
Second
off
with
miss
polk,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye.
A
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
now
on
to
old
business.
Mr
smith
had
asked
for
the
executive
committee
to
bring
this
back
up
again
and
to
revisit
this.
Since
it's
a
new
board,
we
can
do
that.
The
previous
board
had
voted
to
not
allow
dispensaries
in
the
rural
parts
of
the
county,
and
so
he
asked
for
it
to
be
brac
and
that
and
that
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
speak
to
the
reasons
behind
that.
But
you
know
we,
then
I
can
introduce
it
to
the
to
the
board.
U
If
you
divide
that
between
the
the
counties
that
have
it
that
that's
a
lot
of
money
that
we
need,
nobody
else
is
coming
up
with.
You
know
better
ways
to
to
generate
that
type
of
revenue.
At
this
point,
in
my
opinion,
if
we
say
no
to
this,
we're
not
saying
no,
we
don't
want
it
here
in
the
county
anymore.
We
don't
want
it
on
the
streets,
we're
just
saying
no
to
the
revenue
and
I
think
that's
a
mistake.
A
Their
3r,
they
got
1
million
dollars
just
from
that,
and
that's
not
the
tax
revenue
okay,
so
they
got
a
million
dollars
from
the
3r
sharing
if
you
will,
but
then
they
got
more
above
that.
So
if
you
take
the
the
the
amount
that
was
spent
and
divided
by
the
number
of
dispensaries
in
illinois
and
then
take
that
number
times
the
the
tax
percentage,
if
everything
was
equal,
if
each
dispensary
would
have
generated
about
650
000
at
the
maximum
tax
rate
of
3.75
percent,
okay,
so
that's
that
that
would
be
county
money
here.
Just.
A
Or
whatever
it
is
3.75
yeah,
that's
what
we
had
voted
in
before.
Okay,
that
still
stands.
So
the
the
the
question
is
that
that
mr
smith
is
asking
is,
is
do
we
want
to
revisit
that,
and
so
I
brought
it
back
to
this
committee
to
see
if
there
was
a
motion
to
to
to
approve,
because
that's
the
what
it
would
be,
this
committee
would
be
approving
and
sending
it
to
the
full
board
for
that
aspect.
A
O
J
A
Not
necessarily
like
with
vza,
if
there's
a
motion
not
to
approve,
it
still
goes
to
the
full
board.
Okay,
this
is
the
the
same
thing.
It
would
come
from
this
committee
like.
If
this
fails,
you
would
go
forward
with
an
yeah
not
recommended
for
approval.
Okay,
that's
how
that
would
work.
So
that's
what
mr
lear
was
talking
about.
Yeah,
he
thinks
the
bigger
group
should
be
talking
about
it
and
that's
kind
of
it's.
The
precedent
is
there
for
pga
is
what
I'm
looking
at,
because
it
still
has
to
go
in
front
of
the
bigger
group.
T
T
I
I
I
think
it
just
means
that
it
continues
to
be
unregulated
and
untaxed
and
I'll
one
day
I'll
show
you,
sir,
that
that's
just
that
the
market
that
some
of
these
young
men
are
doing
is
it
should
be
illegal,
but
it
it
probably
is,
but
how
are
they
going
to
get
caught?
Because
that's
that's
my
statement
that
it's
out
there
and
easily
available?
If
you
need
to,
if
you
have
facebook,
crazy.
C
A
A
You
know,
department
of
commerce,
to
see
how
many
local
people
how
much
revenue
is
going
to
other
counties
from
kaneki
county
and
because
you
know
you
have
to
you
know,
show
them
a
driver's
license,
and
so
I
figured
that
data
is
being
examined.
So
I
just
I
don't
have
it
yet,
but
so
I
can't
tell
you
what's
going
on
here
right
now,
you
know
from
from
a
law
enforcement
perspective.
A
Q
That
dispensary
is
going
to
be
housed
somewhere,
so
it's
going
to
be
up
to
this
board
to
determine
whether
or
not
you
want
that
locally,
where
we
can
reap
the
benefits
as
opposed
to
reaping
no
benefits
and
still
dealing
with
the
same
stuff,
because
we're
gonna
deal
with
it,
either
way
we'll
deal
with
it,
and
we
all
know
that-
and
I
know
mr
hess
and
and
other
people
have
had
issues
with
substance
abuse
and
their
families.
Probably
there
may
be.
Q
O
B
A
S
P
Street
marijuana
is
a
big
problem,
but
it's
it's
really
hard
to
tell
I
can
just
I
can
tell
you
on
on
two
things
that
will
county
is.
You
just
talked
about,
will
county
having
a
lot
of
money
coming
to
them?
Their
overdoses
have
tripled
already,
because
that's
that's
the
leading
drug
to
the
rest
of
your
drugs.
We
see
more
thc
now
in
all
of
our
drugs
and
toxicology.
That
comes
back.
We
see
that
it's
not
the
cause
of
death,
but
it's
in
a
system
and
it
shouldn't
be
in
the
system.
So.
R
P
A
A
A
I
think
kankakee
grant
park.
I
believe
iroquois
county
voted
to
approve
it
in
their
county,
bradley
too
bradley
as
well
yeah,
so
there's
and
there
will
be
like
only
one
for
the
the
cities.
If
you
will
and
potentially
one
for
the
rural
areas,
that's
that's
kind
of
how
they're
talking
right.
Now,
it's
not
going
to
be
30
of
these
popping
up
like
kwik-e-marts,
you
know
so.
C
A
C
Q
A
T
B
A
T
N
H
S
A
Oh
we'll
definitely
mention
it.
It
won't
be
a
tie,
vote
on
the
agenda,
but
it'll
be
mentioned
in
the
in
the
in
the
meaning
itself,
but
the
red
the
resolution
prep
will
be
to
approve.
If
it
would
have
been
to
not
approve,
then
we
had
to
prepare
it
here
as
not
approval
the
last
time
we
did
this.
It
was
confusing.
A
So
this
is
actually
better
you
if
you're
voting
for
something,
then
you,
if
you're
a
yay
before
it
was
people
had
to
really
think
about.
Okay,
I
I
don't
support
this,
so
I'm
voting
yay.
It
was
remember
that
it
was
confusing
in
that
meeting,
so
this
makes
it
better
that
way.
So,
okay,
well
any
other
business
over
time,
any
new
business.