►
From YouTube: Executive Committee Meeting 6/25/2019
Description
Executive Committee Meeting 6/25/2019 9:00 AM
D
C
B
E
Laryngitis
so
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
say
is
if
members
of
the
committee
or
the
board
what
I
have
a
copy
of
what
the
UCC
I
prepared
in
terms
of
a
overview
of
legislation,
the
seat,
Kelly
and
he'll
have
her
provide
copies
for
you
rather
than
trying
to
go
through
all
these
I.
Don't
know
that
you'd
be
able
to
hear
me
anyway.
Yeah.
B
Sound
like
Rocco,
no,
the
well
I've,
got
that
on
my
desktop.
We
can
email
and
if
somebody
needs
a
paper
copy,
you
know
we'll
email.
First,
no
someone
wants
paper,
we'll
get
it
to
him,
sound
good.
That
was
a
nice
summary
that
they
put
out
the
UCC
I.
Did
it
really
hoped
all
right
moving
on
nothing
under
appointments?
Mr.
Duval
didn't
really
have
a
report
today,
unless
somebody
has
some
questions
regarding
to
information
services,
nope,
okay,
Health
Department,
mr.
Bevis,
not
here
today,
schools,
mr.
B
F
Good
morning
really
I
don't
have
a
lot.
You
have
the
staffing
report
in
front
of
you.
There
is
a
big
jump
this
month
from
531
to
539.
That's
a
total
of
eight
heads,
but
you
should
be
aware
there
are
eight
summer
interns
in
the
in
the
mix
so
four
out
at
highway,
one
in
the
treasurer's
office
and
three
in
the
state's
attorney's
office.
F
So
when
you
look
at
in
total,
you
see
ups
and
downs
kind
of
int
within
departments,
but
the
total
eight
heads
are
summer
help
summer
interns
temporary
positions,
so
they
should
drop
off
towards
the
end
of
the
summer
round,
first
of
August
or
so,
if
history
boats,
true
other
than
that,
there
really
isn't
a
lot
of
changes
throughout.
Does
anybody
have
any
questions
again,
some
flip
in
the
circuit
clerk?
Again
we
added
one
person
that
was
that
was
to
replace.
F
Sorry,
okay,
so
anybody
have
any
other
questions
or
concerns
about
the
staffing
report.
Anything
in
the
trends
that
strikes
you
as
unusual
or
different.
It's
pretty
consistent.
We
do
have
these
you
sent
tend
to
see,
it
will
will
drop,
maybe
four
to
six
in
a
month
and
then
the
next
month
pick
them
up
as
as
those
positions
are
filled,
but
there's
not
a
lot
of
movement
other
than
that.
You
see
the
two
heads
in
Circuit
Clerk
that
were
approved
and
really
that's
about
it.
That's
year-over-year
a
difference.
Mr.
D
F
Ran
it
for
last
year,
and
it
was
about
10%,
which
I
think
is
it's
to
me.
Is
high
I'll,
tell
you
what
I
see
I'm
surprised
at
the
number
of
employees
that
we
hire
and
then
leave
within
a
year.
It
seems
like
if
we
can
keep
them
for
one
to
three
years,
they're
here
for
a
good
long
time,
but
keeping
them
that
that
first
year,
first
couple
years
is
difficult.
You
know
it
just
I.
Some
departments
are
worse
than
others,
but
I
do
see
a
lot
of
turnover
on
low
seniority,
people
you.
D
F
To
me,
it
seems
high
in
a
in
an
entity.
That's
and
maybe
I
shouldn't
say
that
I
was
going
to
say
as
stable
as
county
government
I
mean
we've
had
issues
with
stability
here
and
I.
Think
that's
part
of
from
what
I
hear
and
see
that
there's
have
not
this
lack
of
safety
that
you
know.
Okay,
it's
stable,
I
see
a
lot
of
jumping
for
money,
especially
in
you
know,
starter
positions.
They
can
go
somewhere
else,
I'll
say
a
lot
of
times
what
I
see
in
the
resignation.
F
D
B
F
Do
see
that
I
do
see
that
a
lot
the
turnover
rate
in
Corrections
is
high
part
I
mean
number
one.
You
also
have
to
think
that
there's
a
hundred
thirty-five
people
out
there,
and
so
when
you're
hiring
five
six
at
a
time
or
whatever
there
is
kind
of
that
process.
I
think
where
they
don't
realize.
You
see
a
lot.
A
lot
out
there
I
see
in
terminations
is
within
three
months.
You
know
like
right
away.
They
can
tell
it's
not
a
good
fit
well.
B
And
I
will
say
that
I
think
that
it's
much
more
stable
now
than
it
was
in
years
past.
As
far
as
the
feeling
of
employees
on
stability,
there
was
a
cloud
for
Oh
Steve.
What
do
you
think
four
or
five
years
where
people
didn't
know
if
that
was
the
day
that
it
was
gonna,
be
their
last
I
mean
we
actually
sent
out
pink
slips
to
every
employee
about
four
years
ago?
You
know
so
I
mean
I
would
say.
F
F
F
Did
just
want
to
let
you
know
we
are.
We
have
started
doing
some
work
on
renewals
already
for
the
health
insurance.
So
within
a
month
we're
gonna
have
our
preliminary
conversations.
We
had
a
conversation
with
the
insurance
company
last
week.
We've
got
our
we're
going
to
wait
for
another
month
of
results.
We've
had
a
couple
months
of
really
very
high
claims
rates.
F
F
B
G
E
B
Change
funding
on
those,
even
though
we
are
going
to
have
cash
and
and
could
possibly
go
to
self
insurance.
It's
not
the
time
to
do
that
when
you
need
a
predictable
model
money.
I
know
this
is
a
finance,
but
just
for
this
committee's
knowledge,
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we've
been
working
on
intently
and
then
in
years
past
we
always
had
special
meetings
to
approve
health
insurance.
So
we
could
do
the
budget
where
we
we
won't
we're,
avoiding
that
at
all
cost.
We
will
not
do
special
meetings.
F
B
You
under
administrative
issues,
appointments
reappointments,
I,
have
the
appointment
of
Alice
R
Dylan
to
the
Bourbonnais
Township
Fire
Protection
District
appointment
of
Steve
worth
to
the
Kankakee
River
Valley
Forest
Preserve
Commission
in
the
reappointment
of
David
wolf
to
the
Grinnell
Dame
drainage
district
board
can
I
get
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
mr.
altough
mr.
Bern
with
a
second
any
discussion.
All
those
in
favor
aye.
Those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
under
openings.
B
I
have
one
opening
on
the
BM
Lewis
drainage
district,
one
opening
on
the
gar
Creek
drainage,
one
on
the
manteno
number
three
drainage,
one
on
manteno
number,
nine
drainage,
one
resident
opening
on
the
Housing
Authority
board,
and
one
opening
on
the
Yankee
County
Ethics,
Commission,
okay,
under
new
business,
a
couple
of
things
so
and
Nancy
Mickelson
is
here
not
Nancy?
Did
you
want
to
introduce
anybody
today
to
the
executive
committee?
Put
somebody
on
the
spot.
Do
you
want
to
join
us
up
here?
No,
okay,.
B
B
B
B
They
can't
smoke
in
their
vehicles
if
on
the
property
and
if
they're
going
to
be
taking
people
in
their
car,
they
can't
smoke
in
their
car
so
that
that
that's
codified
in
that
that
collective
bargaining
agreement
but
I,
ask
the
question
you
know:
should
we
look
at
that
for
all
of
our
properties
and
in
the
last
really
it's
picked
up?
The
last
couple
of
weeks
I've
been
working
with
Nancy
and
you
know
what
what
does
that
mean?
What
what
have
we
allowed
to
do
under
the
law?
B
You
know,
there's
clear
distinctions,
you
know
the
illinois
smoke-free,
you
know
the
smoke
free
Illinois
act
should
I
say,
says
certain
things
in
it.
You
know,
there's
no
examples
that
we
could
find
where
all
tobacco
has
been
prohibited
by
a
county
in
Illinois.
There
are
some
municipalities
that
have
a
policy,
but
it
doesn't
look
like
that
ability
even
rest
with
a
county
government
to
do
that
per
you
know.
B
The
hint
county
board
can't
exercise
an
authority
that
I
was
not
expressly
given
by
the
Illinois
counties
code
and
so
that
it's
kind
of
in
that
area,
but
there
is
some
things
that
we
did
want
to
bring
back
to
the
to
the
committee,
to
maybe
hopefully
achieve
the
same
type
of
impact
and
for
discussion
sake,
and
that's
why
there
was
two
agenda
items
on
there
specifically
to
look
at
that.
So
in
your
packet,
it's
on
one
of
the
left-hand
pages.
B
If
your
layout
is
the
same
as
mine
and
see
policy
now
this
is
the
current
policy
correct.
This
is
in
the
policy
and
procedure
manual,
but
it
does
indicate
that
we
are
is
in
accordance
with
the
smoke
free,
Illinois,
Act,
effective,
January,
1st
2008,
so
that
has
to
do
with
the
15
feet
of
entrances:
exits,
windows,
open
and
ventilation
intakes.
It
applies
to
the
use
of
electronic
cigarettes
as
well.
B
B
B
So
when
when
I
asked
Nancy
about
that,
they
actually
went
over
to
the
courthouse
and
the
spot
were
the
that's
just
one
example:
we
have
other
places,
that's
just
the
one,
that's
the
most
prominent
that
we
tend
to
tend
to
discuss
and
use
as
an
example.
Cuz
most
people
have
been
there.
That
area
is
not
15
feet
because
it
is
15
feet
from
the
door,
but
it's
not
from
the
windows
or
the
ventilation
or
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff.
Actually
15
feet
is
in
the
middle
of
the
circle:
Drive,
okay.
B
So
we
did
check
that
out
and
that
kind
of
led
to
the
discussion
of
well.
You
can't
stand
in
the
middle
of
the
circle
Drive,
so
you
have
to
go
on
the
sidewalk.
That's
the
15
feet
really
for
functional
use.
Now
the
the.
If
you
look
at
I,
don't
know
which
page,
if
it
says
page
5
of
10
on
mine,
open
under
410
I'll
see
SAT
2/20.
B
You
know
we
have
the
the
the
mandate
to
post
signs.
It's
fully
described
in
that
no
smoking
signs
symbol
consisting
of
representation,
blah
blah
blah
public
place
of
employment,
where
smoking
is
prohibited
by
the
sacs
I'll.
Have
it
posted
at
every
entrance
in
a
conspicuous
sign?
Clearly
stating
as
smoking
is
pretty
I'll
ask
a
chef
astray
shall
be
removed
from
any
area
where
smoking
is
prohibited.
B
Shell,
conspicuous
conspicuously
post
signs
prohibiting
smoking
in
that
manner,
so
I
just
wanted
to
explain
kind
of
what
the
ground
rules
are
and
what
smoke
free
Illinois
allows
us
to
do
and
and
then
for
a
discussion
sake.
We
may
be
able
to
do
some
things
that
are
difference,
that
it
still
allows
the
employees
to
smoke
that
in
a
designated
area
that
we
have
the
authority
to
to
establish
in
conjunction,
my
recommendation
would
be
with
the
the
maintenance
director
mr.
Bern
first
Thank.
G
You,
mr.
chairman
I'm,
a
government
entity
only
gets
our
role
to
ban
anybody
from
making
choices
in
life
and
if
we
can
figure
out
a
way
where
an
employee
who
chooses
chooses
the
smoke
have
a
designated
area
away
from
the
building.
Again,
no
one
wants
to
walk
into
an
entranceway
with
their
smoke,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
our
job
to
pee
in
any
smoking.
G
B
You
so
it
kind
of
comes
down
to
you
know
the
language
that
would
have
to
be
crafted
if
you
will
to
account
for
situations
like
the
health
apartment
unless
it's
part
of
a
collectively
bargained
agreement.
This
applies,
and
my
question
to
this
committee
would
be
now
that
we
know
what
we
didn't
know
before.
Would
you
want
to
go
down
the
road
of
drafting
that
and
allowing
the
maintenance
director
and
myself
to
establish
these
smoking
areas
on
County
property
as
as
necessary
around
the
county?
H
Illinois,
obviously,
as
a
statute,
so
it's
state
law
and,
as
you
know,
if
you
go
around
the
community
or
anywhere
in
the
state,
you're
gonna
see
you
know,
compliance
with
state
law,
the
Illinois
smoke-free.
So
we
actually
as
a
county,
don't
need
to
do
anything
cuz.
The
law
is
already
in
place.
We
can
be
a
little
bit
more
restrictive
through
the
ordinance
if
we
want,
if
you
want
to
add,
as
it
applies
to
county
buildings
because
as
the
county
board,
you
are
in
charge
of
the
county
buildings.
H
B
That
case,
when,
when
I
put,
you
know
discussion
on
illinois
smoke-free
act,
does
it
fit
in
your
opinion
that
we
could
allow
for
the
adjusting
of
that
policy
with
the
way
the
agenda
is
currently
written?
Or
do
we
have
to
come
back
in
a
while
for
that
sentence
to
be
added
via
a
separate
agenda
item
at
another
committee
meeting
I
believe.
H
H
It
was
Winnebago
they
did
try
to
sneak
in.
You
know
any
tobacco
use
which
would
apply
to
chewing,
but
it's
not
necessarily
in
line
with
the
smoke-free.
Yet
because
if
you
read
the
legislation,
the
legislators
were
more
concerned
with
secondhand
smoke.
So
if
I
choose
to
smoke,
that
doesn't
mean
you
should
have
to
breathe
it
in
so
that's
kind
of
it's
more
clean
air
smoke-free,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
when
Annie
and
I
had
seen
Karen.
You
know
we
had
some
discussions
about
it.
B
B
Now
I
guess
discussion
on
that
point.
Is
this
a
path
that
we
want
to
go
as
an
executive
committee
to
recommend
to
the
board
that
we
establish
these
smoking
areas
that
are
at
least
that
15
feet
away?
They
can
be
more,
they
can
be.
Where
is
determined
the
best
place?
To
do
that
you
know
I,
don't
know
you
know.
I
would
look
to
the
maintenance
director
to
establish
what's
easy
to
maintain
where
we
have
to
put
the
signs
up
because
they're
not
everywhere,
they
should
be
now
around
the
county.
So
is
their
first
time.
D
I,
like
the
idea
are,
there
are
two
considerations
that
in
designating
these
that,
like
you
to
consider,
one
of
them
is
visibility
to
the
public
and
the
front
entrances
that
it
become
not
visible
and,
secondly,
that
they
are
located
in
a
place
that,
if
the
county
develop
money
or
somebody
wanted
to,
they
could
put
a
shelter
or
a
two-sided,
something
to
get
them
out
of
the
weather.
That
would
be
attractive
for
that
particular
building.
Turning
my
two
considerations,
otherwise
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
Okay,.
H
D
H
When
you
do
designate
some
spots,
they
keep
it
in
mind
with
premise
liability
that
we
went
to
on
Tuesday
was
that
last
Tuesday
responsibility.
You
know
if
we
start
inviting
and
start
to
think
where
people
can
be.
We
have
to
take
consideration.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
if
we
designate
smoking
spots,
especially
for
the
public
to
be
in
that
it's
not
somewhere,
hidden
or
somewhere,
necessarily
where
things
can
happen
or
they
would
get
injured,
sure.
E
G
B
A
Under
the
direction
of
the
state's
attorney's
office
in
there,
so
we're
doing
everything-
legal,
oh
sure,
and
are
you
going
to
how
do
I
want
to
say
this
coordinate
like
with
the
chief
judge
at
the
courthouse
or
the
sheriff
at
the
courthouse,
and
are
we
going
to
come
in
conflict
with
now
the
union
contract
at
the
health
department,
because
that's
smoke-free
facility
right
in
a
back
put
one?
There?
Are
there
going
to
be
a
grievance
that
there.
B
We
would
have
the
authority,
in
my
opinion,
to
do
to
do
so
to
place
things
by
the
policy,
but
why
would
we
do
that?
I
guess:
there's
a
question:
why
would
we
kick
the
hornet's
nest
over
there?
So
we're
not.
We
doesn't
say
we
are
gonna,
do
that
everywhere,
but
their
collective
bargain
agreement
is
already
in
place,
so
I
don't
wouldn't
see,
go
and
try
to
designate
some
and
just
inviting
a
grievance.
That
really
wouldn't
make
a
lot
of
sense.
D
B
We
want
to
go
backwards
there
so,
but
again
the
obviously
I
talked
to
the
sheriff
about
all
of
these
things.
We
have
mentioned
in
the
past
easier
to
have
an
issue.
You
know
they
have
their
own
policy
set
up
over
there,
we'll
just
make
sure
that
we're
all
in
compliance
and
the
one
thing
I
think
we
do
really
well
is
communicate.
You
know
I'm
pretty
sure
that
we're
along
those
lines
yeah
so
but
yeah.
Definitely,
mr.
ass,
any
other.
Do
we
have
a
second.
C
B
Washington,
a
third
yeah,
so
any
other
comments
any
any
questions.
You
know
it's
at
the
end
of
all
this,
maybe
we'll
bring
back
like
a
little
narrative
that
says
where
things
are
located.
You
know
I'm
not
saying
it's
gonna
be
tomorrow,
but
we're
we
have
to
go
out
and
do
signs.
You
know
we're.
Gonna
have
to
figure
out.
You
know
how
do
we
do
the
cigarette
receptacle,
so
we
don't
have
butts
all
over
the
ground
and
they
don't
get
dumped
over
people
picking
through
all
you
know
or
disappearing.
B
You
know,
so
we
have
to
figure
out
how
to
to
maintain
this.
If
you
will,
because
they
will,
they
will
get
disappeared
if
they're
not
in
the
right
up
next
to
the
building.
So,
okay,
although
I
guess,
if
there's
no
more
questions
all
those
in
favor,
those
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you
for
that
discussion.
D
B
You
appreciate
it
okay.
Now.
The
next
item
is
is
I,
don't
know
if
everybody
realizes,
but
every
Friday
I
have
to
recertify
the
disaster
declaration
and
send
it
on
to
the
state.
So
we're
scrambling.
You
know,
because
we
all
get
busy
and
we're
like
did
we
do
it?
Did
we
not
do
it
and
we
have
to
recertify
and
send
that
down
now,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
wheels
that
are
in
motion
because
of
this
we
don't
know
how
it's
going
to
turn
out
that
disaster
declaration
for
the
farmland
flooding.
B
If
you
will
we're
still
definitely
not
out
of
the
weeds,
no
pun
intended
on
that
one,
because
the
we
still
got
issues
getting
beans
in
the
ground.
It's
been
raining
for
what
five
six
days
in
a
row
now
I
mean
it's
still,
not
not.
There
I
think
we
got
half
of
the
corn
in
or
between
30
and
50
percent,
depending
on,
where
you're
at
so
what
we're
asking
is
is
I
talked
to
chief
Gessner
about
this.
B
We
can
do
an
ordinance
and/or,
a
resolution
that
allows
us
to
just
have
this
all
the
way
through
the
whole
season.
So
we
can
stop
scrambling
every
Friday
to
recertify
this
disaster
declaration.
So
I
think
it's
in
your
packet.
If
anybody
has
any
questions
about
that,
we
can
run
through
it.
Is
there
a
motion
first
to
approve
mr.
altough?
Second,
mr.
leer,
happy
that
you
know
answer
any
questions
Nancy's
here,
but
it's
pretty
straightforward.
It's
it's!
What
we
did.
B
You
know
when
we
when
I
first
sign
that
declaration
just
now,
I,
don't
think
we
have
the
hour
and
a
half
to
go
into.
What's
behind,
what's
going
on
behind
this
on
the
federal
level
and
how
the
local
farm
groups
its
FSA
they've,
actually
submitted
that
they,
you
know
the
Declaration
and
agree
with
the
damage
assessments,
and
so
it
moves
up
the
ladder
to
the
state.
And
if
the
governor
says
yes
I
agree,
then
the
feds
can
get
involved.
B
So
all
of
that
really
doesn't
happen
until
like
July
August
we're
waiting
for
that's
when
we
would
have
a
determination
whether
there's
gonna
be
any
assistance
that
would
come
from
the
feds
through
the
state.
So
something
like
this
has
never
happened.
They've
never
done
this,
so
they
a
lot
of
times
again.
As
mentioned,
they
never
really
didn't
know
how
to
react
to
it.
We
were
just
going
by
kicking
every
door
to
see
if
we
could
find
some
help
for
the
farmers
and
we'll
see
how
that
comes
out.
B
B
Take
the
last
item
know
a
couple
more
holidays
to
be
observed
by
the
offices
of
kakie
county
for
calendar
year.
2020
chief
chief
judge
is
certified.
Those
does
everybody
have
those
in
their
packet
and
I
see
him
here
all
right.
So
that's
just
a
ministerial
function.
Do
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
these
mr.
alagesh
second
mr.
burns
acting
today.
B
In
favor,
those
opposed
motion
carries
sorry
the
last
item.
This
is
informational,
those
when
we
that
were
on
the
board,
when
we
did
this,
it
seems
like
a
lifetime
ago
way
back
when
we
had
the
the
CBB
came
to
us
and
all
municipalities.
That
said
that
we
want
our
employees
to
be
on
IMR,
F
I,
don't
know
if
this
committee
remembers
that
request-
and
the
first
thing
was
is
we
said,
is:
can
you
even
do
that
they're,
not
government
employees?
B
How
could
you
be
on
IR
MRF
if
you're,
not
a
government,
employee
affiliated
with
a
government?
You
know
a
group
of
government
governments
they
get
together
like
UCC
is
a
good
example.
There
under
I
am
RF
I
believe
because
it's
made
up
of
all
governmental
entities.
So
we
sent
that
through
the
state's
attorney's
office
we
sent
that
to
the
Attorney,
General
and
I
just
kind
of
thought.
It
went
to
the
black
hole.
B
It
would
be
their
opinion
that
if
somebody
were
to
be
eligible
for
higher
MRF
under
the
CVB
type
situation,
their
board
could
only
be
made
up
of
taxing
bodies
of
governmental,
taxing
bodies,
and
it
couldn't
include
people
like
the
hotel,
the
hotel
ears
and
it
couldn't
include
chambers
of
commerce
and
that's
obviously,
part
of
the
makeup
of
what
we
have
with
our
CVB.
So
it
would
require
that
a
new
intergovernmental
agreement
be
drawn
up
between
all
the
communities
and
also
the
CVB
to
change
their
bylaws
here.
B
To
just
be
the
municipal,
governments
and
I
believe
I'd
have
to
read
through
here
again
I
believe
the
park
districts
are
considered
a
taxing
body,
I
think
they
get
IRF
I'd
have
to
look
a
little
closer,
but
regardless
I
kind
of
stopped
at
that
point
because
I'm
like
well,
that's
obviously
not
what
any
of
us
wants.
I
think
that
there
is
an
overall
sense
that
not
overall
sense
just
a
stated.
B
B
If
it
was
a
complete
governmental
entity,
I
think
Rock
Island
is
one
word
is
all
made
up
of
government
entities
they're
subject
to
FOIA.
So
let's
just
say
that
if
you
go-
and
you
say
you're
another
CVB
and
you
could
foil
them
and
say
I
want
to
see
a
list
of
all
of
your
events
that
are
staying
in
all
your
hotels
in
the
area.
They'd
have
to
provide
basically
a
target
sales
list
to
you
of
who
you
can
go
call
on
to
try
to
get
to
your
area.
B
That's
the
big
problem
with
that
being
subject
to
FOIA
is
as
you're
giving
away
all
of
your
customers.
That's
why
these
things
are
501c3,
so
I
just
want
to
just
mention
that
to
this
committee:
it's
not
in
the
best
interests
of
a
convention
of
Israel's
Bureau
to
provide
that
data.
Now
all
the
other
financials
I
can
see
a
reason
but
who
your
customers
are?
Who
you're
dealing
with
your
vendors?
That's
one
of
the
reasons,
I
think
that
I'm
no
longer
a
board
member.
That's
why
I
felt
so
strongly
about
that.
B
You
can't
give
that
information
away,
because
that's
what
you
worked
hard
to
get
to
come
to
your
area
and
somebody
could
submit
a
FOIA
and
just
a
here
we
go
CVB
from
town
X
in
Illinois,
they'll
call
on
all
these
people.
They
got
events,
so
that's
I
just
want
to
kind
of
clarify
that
why,
in
my
opinion,
that's
such
a
big
deal
and
it
matters-
and
we
owe
that
to
our
hotels,
to
protect
that
information.
Those
are
their
clients.
So
any
questions
about
any
of
that.
B
B
Well,
I
pass
it
on
the
CVB,
yeah
I.
Let
them
know
and
I
it's
up
to
them
to
take
that
information,
how
they
would
would
do
you
know
with
that
I'm
no
longer
the
representative,
I
I
would
guess
they
probably
don't
want
to
do
another
intergovernmental
agreement
right
now,
I
would
probably
say
that
that's
a
pretty
I
was
a
bad
man
and
I'm,
not
they're,
not
going
to
do
that,
but
yeah.