►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 4/30/2020
Description
Finance Committee Meeting 4/30/2020 9:00 AM
A
C
C
D
B
E
A
A
A
A
All
those
opposed
same
sign
motion
carries
movin
on
under
highways
and
buildings.
We're
going
to
do
the
pay
engine
pay
county,
engineer,
pay
estimates
first.
Mr.
leer
has
yielded
the
chair
to
me
to
run
the
meeting.
Is
that
correct
mr.
leer?
That
is
correct?
Okay,
thank
you,
sir,
and
then
so
we'll
do
the
pay
engineer.
Estimates
first,
which
will
allow
us
to
then
have
a
motion
to
open
bids
which
will
then
allow
mr.
Rogers
to
go
open
up
all
of
the
envelopes.
A
A
F
F
This
is
able
to
comforts
minerals
for
salt
that
was
delivered
to
our
salt
stockpile,
and
that
amount
is
forty,
two
thousand
three
hundred
twenty-six
dollars.
Fifty
six
cents
next
is
for
our
2020
general
maintenance
supplement
one.
This
is
payable
to
Decker
Supply
Company.
This
is
for
steel
signposts
that
were
delivered
to
our
shop.
That
amount
is
four
thousand
nine
hundred
seventy-five
dollars.
Fifty
cents
next
is
for
our
2020
county
general
maintenance
supplement
one.
This
is
payable
to
in
a
splint.
F
Next
is
for
our
Kankakee
County,
twenty
twenty
general
maintenance.
This
is
payable
to
Gallagher
materials
corporation.
This
is
for
cold
patch
picked
up
at
their
plant
in
that
amount
is
two
thousand
seven
hundred
ninety
eight
dollars,
sixty
eight
cents
next,
is
for
the
county's
twenty
twenty
general
maintenance
supplement
one
table
two
Osborne
associates.
This
is
for
sheeting
and
complete
traffic
signs,
and
that
amount
is
twelve
thousand
nine
hundred
seventy
five
dollars.
Ninety
cents
next
is
for
our
2020
general
maintenance
for
the
county
supplement
one.
This
is
payable
to
potters
industry.
F
F
F
F
F
B
A
F
D
A
E
B
E
A
A
A
So
moving
on,
while
he
opens
the
bids
under
consent
agenda,
if
we
could
I'll
go
ahead
and
read
these
into
the
record,
because
this
is
a
little
bit
different
than
we
normally
do
things,
but
I
need
a
motion
to
combine
and
approve
the
consent
agenda
or,
if
there's
anything
as
we
mentioned
before.
If
anybody
has
any
questions,
please
call
the
department
head
among
those
for
those
reports:
okay,
because
it's
it's
something
that
is
standard
operating
procedure,
there's
nothing
in
there.
A
That
is
a
a
financial
decision
if
you
will-
and
we
did
not
get
an
auditor's
report
again
this
month.
This
is
a
second
month
with
no
claims
report,
so
I
just
want
to
mention
that
to
the
Finance
Committee
as
well.
So
so,
if
there's
anything
else,
nothing
to
discuss,
is
there
a
motion
to
a
combined
and
approve.
G
G
A
The
second
mrs.
Haas,
okay
I'll,
read
these
in
the
record:
reappointment
of
James
Lamont
to
the
greater
moments'
Fire
Protection
District
reappointment
of
Peter
Vale
to
the
farmland
assessment
review
board,
reappointment
of
Paul
Gerlach
to
the
bourbonnais
Fire
Protection
District,
the
circuit
clerk's
monthly
report,
coroner's
report,
coroner's
monthly
receipts
offer
March
2020
Treasuries
reports
from
2020
collectors
report
from
2020
March
monthly
resolutions
for
May
20
20
month
lis
building
report
for
March
20
20
month.
Ii
resolutions
for
May.
A
A
A
A
It
was
my
cell
phone
bill
for
the
county
phone
and
the
stipulation
was
correct.
Verizon
changed
the
way
they're
billing
looks
and
they
started
adding
the
tax
into
the
actual
per
line
charge,
which
was
new
and
I
hadn't,
caught
that
so,
rather
than
the
assertion
that
I
was
knowingly
double
dipping
on
the
taxpayers,
as
was
noted
by
the
auditor
on
that
form,
I
wanted
the
board
to
see
the
type
of
language
that's
used
between
the
auditor's
office
and
in
this
office.
A
He
was
correct
in
the
fact
that
it
was
a
mistake
and
we
deducted
that
from
the
the
cellphone
reimbursement.
So
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
to
the
board,
while
it's
it
has
to
be
a
motion
in
a
second
I'd
like
to
first
thank
the
auditor
for
refusing
the
claim
because
of
the
mistake
I
made
and
I
wished,
he
would
have
called
or
emailed
me,
but
instead
it
now
comes
before
the
board.
So
I
thought
you
guys
have
a
chance
to
deny
that
or
make
that
recommendation.
A
A
B
H
D
A
B
B
A
B
H
A
J
And
Aaron,
yes,
I,
think
what
the
auditor
trying
to
claim
is
that,
because
the
General
Assembly
is
not
meeting
with
the
kovat,
we
should
suspend
the
contract.
Unfortunately,
in
my
opinion,
that
represents
a
misunderstanding
of
the
job
of
lobbyist
lobbyist
is
active
meeting
with
individual
legislators
meeting
with
representatives
of
the
executive
agencies,
even
when
the
General
Assembly
is
not
in
session,
and
so
the
job
of
a
lobbyist
is
ongoing.
I
would
move
that
we
go
ahead
and
pay.
A
G
A
A
A
A
new
contract,
the
other
one
expired,
and
we
voted
on
the
new
contract
right
now
we
have
to
reprove
the
authorization
to
pay
through
the
end
of
this
contract,
which
inspires
at
the
end
of
the
legislative
session
in
November.
So
we
won't
have
to
do
it
again.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
saying
okay,
we
do
this.
A
But
we
had
those
conversations
and
we
used
our
lobbyists
for
that
amongst
everything
else
that
we're
working
on
our
agenda
that
involves
schools
and
everything
else
that
the
county's
evolved
in
so
I
can
assure
you
that
we're
in
regular
regular
communication
working
on
projects
and
and
will
for
the
rest
of
this
year.
So
is
there
anybody
else
that
has
any
thoughts
or
questions?
B
E
K
K
B
A
A
Didn't
receive
anything
so
good
thing.
We
you
guys
authorized
me
to
pay
the
bills,
or
else
our
vendors
would
be
strung
out
for
not
going
in
the
third
month.
So
we
hope
that
those
reports
sometime
would
start
happening
again.
That
would
be
nice
20
20
cash
flow
into
managing
current
year
projection.
So
this
is
something
that
Steven
Anita
have
been
working
on.
We've
been
meeting
on
this
on
a
regular
basis,
so
we
wanted
to
at
least
get
that
to
the
board
now,
so
they
would
understand
what
the
knowns
are.
H
Okay,
well
I'm
gonna
share
my
screen
and
drop
us
into
the
PowerPoint.
That
kind
of
is
an
overview
and
partway
through
the
PowerPoint,
then
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
to
Steve
and
he's
gonna
actually
go
through
his
three
models.
But
hopefully
this
will
give
you
an
idea
of
where
our
cash,
our
cash
and
unbalanced
projections
are
right
now
and
what
the
estimates,
what
the
models
are
showing
as
we
move
forward
through
this
closure
period,
Kelly
you've
disabled
participants
screen
sharing.
So
could
you
please
put
that
on
for
me,
so
that
I
can
open
up
the.
K
L
H
H
H
Pain:
okay,
okay,
so
we
had
a
nine
million
dollar
loss
over
a
three
year
period
or
a
pace
of
about
250,000
dollars.
A
month.
Over
36
months,
there
were
essentially
two
main
revenue
sources
affected:
the
sales
tax
and
the
bed
rental
program
that
you
old
that
loss.
Compare
that
to
our
current
pandemic
and
our
downturn
over
the
last
45
days.
Our
revenue
pace
right
now
is
approximately
$500,000
a
month,
so
doubled
what
the
downturn
was
in
13
and
14.
The
duration
is
unknown
at
this
time.
H
We
don't
know
how
long
this
is
going
to
last
and
instead
of
two
revenue
sources.
There
are
multiple
revenue
sources
at
this
and
and
possibly
others
that
were
unaware
of
yet
that
we've
been
able
to
quantify
from
a
fun
balanced
perspective.
Our
general
fund
balance
at
11:30
2019,
was
1.5
million
dollars
to
the
good
our
FY
20,
but
had
a
contingency
line
of
1.5
million
dollars,
so
at
12
1
2019.
Our
original
estimate
was
to
end
the
year
with
a
three
million
dollar
fund
balance
to
the
good.
H
I
I
For
other
members,
we
did
send
you
the
regular
reports
once
the
reports
who
won't
spend
any
time
on
those.
But
if
you
look
at
like
the
sales
tax
and
the
use
facts
you'll
see
that
the
time
frame
of
on
the
left
is
the
when
it
takes
place
with
the
retailer
and
and
then
as
compared
to
when
to
kyani
receive
the
money.
I
Even
last
night,
I
heard
a
story
locally,
where
a
drive-through
is
keeping
up
with
regular
business.
I've
also
heard
ranges
from
minus
30%
to
minus
80
percent.
We
know
that
there's
a
lot
of
places
not
open
right
now.
So
through
the
discussions
that
we've
had,
we
came
up
with
an
estimate
of
minus
50
percent.
I
The
skew
tried
to
put
number
and
an
effect
to
this
during
close
months
for
sales
tax
and
in
the
first
reopening
month
at
minus
25%,
so
a
u-shaped
recovery
where
it
could
take
a
little
bit
of
time
for
everything
to
come
back
to
normal.
For
those
you
know
reopening
and
you
know
that
are
most
affected
from
an
income
tax
that
would
equal
out
to
the
unemployment
conversations
that
we're
hearing
early
on.
I
We
were
hearing
12
to
15
percent
estimates,
I
think
in
other
parts
of
the
country
we're
now
hearing
now
upwards
of
15
to
20
percent.
Potentially
so
we
chose
we
picked
14%
on
the
close
month
in
7%
in
degree
opening
month,
so
minus
14
and
minus
7
news
tax
follows
the
same
time
line
as
far
as
March
to
June
April
to
July
as
sales
tax.
Does
you
know?
I
Again
we're
hearing
no
change
to
potential
increase
by
the
way
35
40
percent
decreases
because
of
the
changes
in
buildings
being
open
and
their
activity.
So
we
worked
with
25%
and
you
know:
looked
at
their
individual,
normal
rates
of
fees,
fines,
things
of
those
natures
and
then
combine
them.
It's
it's
averages
out
to
minus
25
percent
close
month
and
we
use
15
percent
on
the
first
reopening
month
and
then
for
other
things
that
we
have
not
been
able
to
identify.
I
H
So
those
were
the
things
we
were
felt
comfortable,
quantifying
and
including
in
the
model.
There
are
other
things
that
we
don't
have
enough
information
on
currently,
so
there
are
unknown
variables
at
this
time
and
not
yet
included
in
the
model.
So
the
first
is
tax
receipts.
We
don't
know.
If
are
late
and
non-payment,
property
taxes
will
be
in
s,
excess
of
our
historic
trend
or,
if
it'll
hold
true,
as
it
has
in
years
going
past.
So
we're
going
to
watch
that
grant
receipts
both
on
a
federal
and
a
state
level.
H
There
could
be
either
delayed
or
non-payment
of
reimbursement
grants
based
on
especially
from
a
state
state
perspective.
The
downturn
in
the
revenues
for
the
state
as
well.
The
other
thing
that
is
a
concern
is
the
grant
in
aid
especially
affects
the
largest
one
is
our
probation
department
and
if
there
will
be
a
change
there,
either
a
late
payment
or
non-payment
of
several
months
or
those
grant-in-aid,
so
those
are
not
in
the
modeling.
The
next
thing
would
be:
is
this
a
longer
term
recession?
H
So
if
you
read
articles
they're
indicating
that,
depending
on
how
long
the
closures
go,
there
could
be
those
businesses
that
have
been
closed.
There's
a
historic
trend
that,
after
an
emergency
businesses
that
closed
thirty
to
sixty
percent
of
them
never
reopened.
So
there
is
a
concern
there
that
this
will
lead
to
a
longer
term,
recession
or
employees
that
aren't
able
to
go
back
to
work
and
then,
as
Steve
mentioned
in
the
previous
slide,
is
the
recovery
going
to
be
a
V
or
au?
H
In
other
words,
once
the
economy
reopens,
will
there
be
a
sharp
decrease
to
prior
or
increase
to
prior
levels,
or
will
it
be
a
bit
slower?
Will
be
our
citizens
be
a
little
more
cautious
and
not
return
to
the
prior
spending
limits
or
units
as
they
had
historically,
so
those
are
the
things
that
are
not
yet
included
in
the
model.
There
are
three
models:
one
is
three
months,
four
months
and
five
months,
those
are
reopened
dates
of
June,
July
or
August.
H
A
I
Our
estimate
is,
with
the
reopening
month
in
June
that
the
ending
fund
balance
for
the
general
fund
would
be
approximately
1
million
dollars.
So
the
good
news
right
now
is
that
the
general
fund
is
still
positive.
The
bad
news
is
the
length
of
time
and
the
level
of
impact
that
the
public
situation
what
we're
experiencing.
So
that's
what
we're
attempting
to
try
to
understand
by
using
this
and
then
the
changes
in
option
D
as
compared
to.
J
J
I
I
I
Any
other
questions
are
just
going
to
explain:
option
B
the
differences
to
option
B.
The
difference
is
only
in
the
bed,
rental
lying
and
the
miscellaneous
receipt
sign
on
the
inflows,
basically
extending
the
closed
month,
calculations
out
further
and
then
recalculating
that
impact,
as
well
as
an
option
C
so
I
should
be
great.
Hopefully
month
is
July
and
the
full
month
of
everything
back
to
normal.
If
you
will,
the
estimated
impact
would
be
500,000
in
d,
thumb,
bounce
and
then
option
C.
I
I
The
explanation
there
is
that
that's
not
off
the
table,
but
in
order
to
have
apples
to
apples
calculation,
we
had
to
make
sure
that
we
had
everything
just
flowing
under
normal
conditions
that
can
always
come
back
into
discussion,
but
in
order
to
know
apples
to
apples
of
change,
they
had
to
calculate
that
without
it.
At
this
point,
that's
all
I
had
enough,
there's
any
questions
or
send
it
back,
because
Anita
and
Andy.
A
So
there
any
any
questions
about
any
of
this
for
Steve
before
we
move
on
to
the
to
the
next
phase
on
here.
It's
just
my
only
comment
is:
is
it
that
we
need
to
keep
in
mind
that
those
variables
are
still
hanging
out
there?
This
model
has
you
know
50%
like
for
sales
tax
or
whatever
that
not
to
forgive
me,
but
what?
If
it
comes
in
60?
What
if
it
comes
in
20?
What,
if
you
know
property
taxes
come
in
and
people
are
having
trouble
paying
those
or
income
taxes
down
because
of
reduced?
A
You
know
household
income.
You
know
those
are
things
that
we
just
don't
know.
What
did
people
shift
from?
You
know
buying
it
stores,
where
it's
a
lower
sales
tax
into
having
you
know,
GrubHub
and
all
these
other
people
deliver
a
highly
taxed
prepared
food
to
their
house.
We
just
don't
know
how
this
is
gonna
manifest,
so
there
is
still
a
lot
of
unknowns
out
there.
A
So
if
you
look
at
option
a
at
being
a
million
that
that
may
change
when
June
hits-
and
we
start
to
look
at
those
those
receipts
that
start
coming
in
from
the
state,
so
just
a
little
perspective-
it's
these
are
projections
based
on
unknown
variables
at
this
point
and
it's
a
the
best
educated
guess
that
we
can
give
you
on
trying
to
be
conservative
in
that
approach.
So
any
questions
for
Steve
before
we
kind
of
move
to
the
next
phase,
their
hand
Aaron,
no
okay,
all
right
so
I
apologize
with
I
can't
see
them.
A
So
is
there
anybody's
waving
their
hand?
Okay,
so
let
me
run
through
this
real,
quick
and
then
we'll
see
if
there's
any
more
questions.
So
again,
the
original
estimate
of
the
20
we
all
know
was
to
have
the
million
and
a
half
that
we
had
gained
you're.
At
least
the
million
half
general
fund
surplus
we
had
at
the
beginning
of
this
budget
year
was,
we
were
gonna,
run,
another
million
and
a
half
surplus
to
get
further
out
of
the
hole
to
further
reduce
the
the
need
to
ever
borrow
or
things
like
that.
A
But
the
current
estimate,
as
of
331,
is
we're
already
at
that
point:
a
half
a
million
dollars
off
of
that,
and
so
accordingly,
if
we're
down
$500,000
in
estimated
loss
every
month
in
revenue,
you
know
you
can
see
that
right
now,
we're
probably
sitting
at
2
and
if
we
go
another
month,
you
know
a
full
month
or
reopened
in
June.
We're
we're
talking
we're
down
to
one.
A
So
this
this
this
absolutely
escalates
and
it's
consistent
and
that's
not
counting
all
the
unknowns
like
grant
nade
if
we're
not
getting
reimbursed
for
that
and
other
things
the
state
may
not
have
to
pay
for
and
all
the
other
things
we
mentioned.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
you
know
you
won't
see
me
I
didn't
put
an
option
up
here
for
going
back
into
the
negative
again,
because
I
don't
think
anybody
wants
to
go
back
to
where
we've
been
so.
A
This
whole
extra
exercise
in
this
project
for
the
last
month
has
been
geared
to
giving
you
the
best
information
we
have
as
it
evolves,
and
we've
had
to
readjust
this
continually
as
things
become
known,
but
give
you
the
information
and
decide
as
a
board.
When
is
it
time
to
take
action
based
on
the
numbers
that
we
are
comfortable
with,
you
know
we
know
we're
not
coming
out
of
this
unscathed
from
a
financial
sense,
not
to
mention
the
human
cost,
but
what
what.
L
A
It
as
a
board
are
we
willing
to
do
as
far
as
a
number
that
then
we
need
to
have
an
action
plan
developed
around
that
number.
You
can't
do
it
the
other
way.
If
there's
changes
that
need
to
be
made,
then
we're
gonna
have
to
make
those
changes
based
on
what
we
decide.
That
number
is
so
that's
today.
Today's
discussion
is:
what
is
the
trigger?
A
Is
it
a
million?
Is
it
five
hundred
thousand
knowing
that
either
one
of
those
could
be
lower
by
the
time
that
we
get
to
that
point
of
knowledge
or
see?
Is
it
zero,
which
will
likely
be
negative
by
the
time
we
get
to
that
point?
So
right
now
is
the
time
for
a.
If
there's
a
motion,
if
there's
a
discussion
consensus,
you
know
we
just
need
to
start
running
through
these
things
and
see
what
you
guys
are
thinking
to
recommend
to
the
full
board
for
approval.
A
C
Like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
use,
the
million
dollar
trigger
to
enact
any
kind
of
fail-safes
to
protect
from
our
employees
and
our
obligations
just
because
our
payroll
is
like
1.5,
sometimes
in
a
month.
So
if
we
don't
have
some
kind
of
cushion
and
a
million
dollars
really
isn't
enough
to
have
a
cushion.
But
if
something
would
happen,
we
don't
have
that
cushion.
We
could
really
be
in
the
hard
time
so
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
at
the
million
dollar
trigger
option.
A
a
second
okay.
A
D
J
J
L
A
You
and
it's
one
thing
I
mentioned
you
know
it
was
the
word
reserved.
You
know
this
is
a
fun
balance
that
you
know
it's
not
necessarily
cash
on
hand,
there's
always
that
difference
between
a
fund
balance
in
cash.
So
it's
my
opinion
was
and
I
wasn't.
Gonna
put
this
out.
There
first
is
to
go
with
a
million
because
it
allows
us
the
most
flexibility
to
deal
with
unknowns
in
terms
of
cash
and
what
the
state's
gonna
do
with
everything
else,
but
we
don't
have
a
reserve
fund
beyond
that.
A
We're
still
living
hand-to-mouth
because
we
were
about.
You
know
what
a
third
of
the
way
through
where
we
needed
to
be
so
we
didn't
need
to
live
hand-to-mouth
and
we
had
a
reserve
and
we
didn't
need
to
run
the
banks
who
frankly
may
or
may
not
be
there
based
on
how
their
lending
is
looking.
You
know,
we
don't
know
how
there
are
small
business
loans
and
their
housing
loans
are
and
if
ta
W
is,
are
even
going
to
be
accessible.
So
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
as
well.
That's
another
unknown.
A
C
C
K
March
and
in
a
renewal
of
twenty
one
thousand
seven
three
hundred
sixty
seven
dollars
for
March,
and
that
was
a
total
increments.
This
thing
last
year,
when
we
factor
out
1
large
permit
for
CSL
bearing
we
only
had
49
permits
and
we've
only
brought
in
1462
dollars,
so
I
would
say
our
permitting
is
strong
and
actually
higher
than.
A
Already
any
other
questions
on
that
so
I'm
hearing
you
know
the
motion
in
the
second
was
on
the
the
million
dollars
once
if
that
is
approved,
then
we'll
start
to
go
back
and
and
tailor
a
response
that
if
and
when
we
we
get
to
that
that
number.
What
are
the
recommended
actions
from
our
finance
professionals
here
at
the
county
so
and
that
then
you'll
have
another
decision
set
of
decisions
to
make
at
that
point.
So
I.
A
E
A
Thank
you
for
that.
Okay,
then
there's
nothing
else.
Any
other
comments,
thoughts
and
we
could.
We
could
we're
not
necessarily
spending
money
here,
we're
making
a
financial
we're,
making
a
recommendation
to
the
full
board
I'm
what
they
would
do
in
this
matter.
So
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
and
I'll.
Do
a
voice
vote?
That's
okay!
With
everybody.
D
E
E
E
E
A
Right
motion
carries
thank
you.
Well,
this
will
be
a
final
determination,
as
the
full
board
will
run
through
the
I
hope.
If
other
members
of
the
that
aren't
on
Finance
Committee
will
check
out
the
presentation
and
come
to
that
meeting,
armed
with
information
and
reach
out
to
Steve
and
Anita
and
myself.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
that.
Obviously
the
folks
here
know
what's
going
on.
A
We
want
to
make
sure
the
rest
of
the
board
does
as
well
so
lots
of
time
between
now
and
then
to
get
those
questions
answered
real
quick
I
want
to
take.
You
can
bring
those
up
and
pull
back
up
here.
Please
and
then
we
want
to
take
care
of
the
PVC
liability.
Insurance
is
the
next
item,
so
we
have
some
guests
on
the
call
today,
as
a
little
bit
of
background.
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
understands
the
PVC.
A
The
public
building
Commission
is
the
true
I
guess
owner
right
now
of
the
the
jail
complex
out
there,
the
parts
that
are
still
on
a
bond
there,
the
bonding
authority.
We
did
alternate
revenue
bonds
some
years
ago
to
establish
that
facility
out
there,
and
so,
as
the
bondholder,
it
was
their
responsibility
to
get
insurance
for
the
building
and
it's
our
responsibility
as
the
the
county
to
carry.
You
know,
insurance
on
contents
of
the
building
and
and
everything
associated
with
the
vehicles
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
A
So
because
we
started
moving
through
this
and
we
we
we
partnered
with
IC
RMT,
they
saved
us
just
a
ton
of
money
over
the
years
and
they've
been
a
valuable
resource
on
controlling
cost,
as
we've
started.
To
take
a
look
at
the
way
we
address
our
liability,
we've
got
good
partners
and
they're
on
the
phone
and
I'll.
Let
our
broker
consultant
introduce
his
team,
but
it
became
evident
that
we
needed
to
as
most
counties
do
that
have
a
PBC
involved.
A
We
needed
to
try
to
roll
that
insurance
together
and
have
the
same
policy
with
similar
type
limits
and
coordination
of
those
limits.
Those
benefit
limits
and
to
avoid
any
issues
which
we
haven't
really
had
major
ones.
Some
things
came
up
and
they
were
major
stumbling
blocks,
but
we
also
realized
that
that,
under
the
the
current
policy,
the
county
has
right
now
for
liability.
None
of
the
contents
of
the
the
jail
were
insured
and
they
weren't
insured
under
the
PBC's
policy.
So
there's
a
chance
for
disconnection.
A
If
this
is
not
coordinated
properly,
and
so
we
we
ran
the
numbers
I
asked.
You
know
our
consultant
broker
to
run
the
numbers
to
see
exactly
what
it
would
be
and
I
see.
Rmt
came
up
with
a
program
that
they
want
to
present
to
you,
where
it
will
save
us
money,
because,
ultimately,
when
the
PBC
gets
a
bill
for
liability
insurance,
the
county
pays
for
it.
A
So
it's
really
our
bill,
even
though
it's
going
from
one
entity
to
another,
so
we
have
a
lot
of
influence
over
where
we
go
here
because
we're
the
ones
who
are
paying
the
bill.
So
we
went
through
that
that
process.
I
am
not
a
member
of
the
board
of
the
PBC
I'm
kind
of
like
what
do
they
call
that
ex
officio
I'm
off
to
the
side
I
go
to
the
meetings,
but
there
was
a
vote
there
to
allow
this
to
move
forward
because
they
saw
the
financial
benefit.
A
So
the
Finance
Committee
here
is
going
to
hear
the
information
and
then
be
cleared
to
take
out
whatever
action
we
need
to.
Knowing
that
the
PBC's
insurance
expires.
You
know
June,
and
so
they
would
be
potentially
added
to
our
policy
for
the
rest
of
the
year
on
a
pro
rate
and
you'll
see
the
financial
benefits
and,
and
the
other
things
that
I
see
RMT
is
offering.
So
with
that
Homer.
Are
you
able
to
introduce
your
team
and
you
guys
can
take
the
floor?
Yeah.
M
Thank
you,
Andy
I'm
I'm,
here
with
Dan
Mackey
from
Alliant
and
Todd
Greer
who's,
the
senior
vice
president
for
the
IPM
G
group,
which
represents
the
eye
serum
T
program.
So
little
history
here
when
we
took
over
your
program,
I
was
in
discussions
with
Dan
Mackey
at
alliant
and
Todd
over
at
the
ICR
MT
and
I
mentioned
you
know,
Kankakee
is
very
unique
and
how
they're
placing
their
insurance
coverages
most
of
our
counties
that
have
outside
entities
that
are
governed
by
the
county
board,
essentially
are
insured
under
the
county's
program.
M
So
we
began
to
look
at
that
and
actually
we've
had
it.
We
had
a
couple
claims
that
came
through
where
the
other
broker
said.
Well,
that's
not
our
claim,
that's
the
IC
RMT's
claim
and
in
reality
it
was
not
their
claim
and
a
happened
twice
so
we
moved
along
and
we
decided
that
we
should
provide
you
guys
with
a
quote.
Todd
did
add
some
content
coverage
to
your
files
last
year
ago,
cost
just
to
make
sure
that
there
was
coverage
there
in
case
there
was
any
discrepancies,
so
what
we've
done
is
essentially
saved
the
county.
M
Approximately
fourteen
thousand
five
hundred
and
thirty-two
dollars
by
adding
your
program,
the
beat
the
PBC
is
building
and
contents
coverage
and
liability
coverages
to
the
current
IC
RMT
program
and
that
would
take
effect
on
june
1st
of
2020
and
the
reason.
Why
is
because
their
policy
that
these
BB
c--
policy
runs
out
on
June,
1st
and
you're
not
obligated
to
renew
with
them
at
that
time?
So
there's
no
penalties.
M
So,
basically,
the
proposal
is
to
move
the
pvcs
policy
on
to
the
ICMP
program,
which
would
afford
the
same
protections
that
are
currently
in
place
under
your
policy
with
the
county.
So
with
that
said,
we
would
then
take
your
property
limits
from
currently
I
believe
were
around
66
million
to
119
million
thirty-four
thousand
nine
hundred
thirty
two
dollars
at
a
cost
of
annual
costs
of
forty
nine
thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
dot
five
dollars
and
a
prorated
cost
beginning
in
June
at
twenty
three
four
one.
Six
prior
to
this,
you
were
paying
fifty
nine
thousand.
M
So
it's
an
overall
savings
of
fourteen
thousand
five
hundred
and
thirty-two
dollars
and
again
provides
you
all
the
same
coverages
such
as
open
door
legal.
We
will
come
in
and
appraise
the
property
in
the
contents
that
didn't
get
appraised
before
because
it
wasn't
under
the
county's
program.
So
that's
a
free
free
service,
that's
provided
you
also
have
access
to
our
loss
and
risk
assessment
tools,
so
basically
you'll
enjoy
all
the
same
coverages
that
the
county
currently
enjoys
under
the
AMT
program.
So
there's
14
grand
back
in
your
coffers.
Folks.
A
G
G
A
A
All
be
under
one
policy
with
one
bowers
yeah
wasn't
necessarily
a
broker
issue.
It
was
more
of
an
issue
of
cost
savings,
contents
coverage
and
then
coordinating
all
of
these
things,
the
policy
we
had
some
issues,
but
they
weren't
major,
but
if
they
become
major,
you
tend
to
have
two
companies
pointing
at
each
other.
That's
that's
not
a
good
position
to
be
in
for
us.
M
A
B
E
M
Todd
will
Todd
and
Dan
will
prepare
the
document
for
you,
two
sign
wants
to
probe.
All
you
have
to
do
once
is
approved
and
the
proposal
is
signed
to
send
it
over
to
us
and
we
will
amend
all
of
your
current
property
values
and
your
contents
coverage
and
again
then,
at
that
time
the
the
PBC
and
their
directors
will
be
afforded
the
same
coverages
that
you
all
are
currently
afforded.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Every.
A
F
B
F
F
F
F
A
F
A
Is
that
noted
by
the
group,
if
it's
usually
ten
percent
more
than
the
lowest
bid,
is
more
in
ten
percent
of
the
estimate
it
triggers
an
another
action
on
bidding,
but
per
marks
discussion.
The
motion
would
have
to
include
for
all
of
these
do
include
for
him
to
check
that
out.
As
you
mentioned.
Yes,
okay,
all.
F
F
F
F
F
A
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
E
F
F
F
F
F
Cease
bid
is
144
thousand
$30.95
144,000
$30.95
next
is
Grasso
construction
company.
They
have
a
bid
bond
attached
as
a
proposal
guarantee
and
they
have
an
ATC
attached
crosses
bid.
Is
one
hundred
twenty
nine
thousand
six
hundred
twenty
eight
dollars
sixty
cents,
one
hundred
twenty
nine
thousand
six
2860.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
And
they
have
an
ATC
attached.
A
ZZZ
bid
is
forty,
seven
thousand
two
hundred
twenty
six
dollars.
85
cents
and
next
is
Grasso
construction
company.
He
has
a
cashier's
check
in
the
amount
of
$1,000
as
a
proposal
guarantee
and
there
is
an
ATC
attached.
Grasso's
bid
is
forty
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
one
dollars:
thirty
cents.
Forty
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
one
dollars
thirty
cents.
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
J
A
J
F
Well
and
our
last
highway
and
bridge
committee
meeting
we,
we,
the
committee,
voted
for
me
not
to
release
the
estimates
anymore
or
the
plan
holders
list.
So
we
did
not
give
out
our
estimate.
We
used
our
estimates
kind
of
from
last
year,
not
knowing
what
was
going
to
happen,
but
I
feel
that
a
lot
of
this
is
the
oil
prices
may
have
dropped
and
may
be
contributing
to
this.
F
C
F
A
B
E
D
A
Tried
yeah
moving
on
to
Planning
and
Zoning.
We
we
had
some
more
solar
farm
decommissioning
plans
come
in
we've
already
approved.
One
I'm
gonna
leave
the
floor
to
del
to
talk
about
this
a
moment.
I
have
to
run
out
of
the
room.
Real
quick
I'll
be
right
back
and
then,
if
you
could,
please
answer
any
questions
del
if
I'm
not
back.
Okay,
do
you
have
a
presentation
on
your
screen
to
run
through
I.
E
K
Better
all
right,
provided
you
three
decommissioning
plans,
we've.
Actually
the
county's
actually
already
approved
to
beacon
one
for
the
young.
So
in
your
packet
you
have
decommissioning
plans
for
solar
rental
and
peeterman.
Those
are
all
from
the
same
company,
Cypress
Creek
and
two
hundred
thirty
two
dollars.
Two
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
dollars
for
these
silver.
B
B
K
Let's
start
over
the
we've,
provided
you
with
the
decommissioning
plans
or
three
more
solar
farms.
One
is
the
peeterman
solar
farm
in
a
Roma
Township
one
is
the
Vulcan
solar
farm
in
limestone
Township
and
the
other
one
is
Nostrand,
which
is
in
Manteno
Township
right
next
to
the
Bourbon,
a
Timeship
border.
K
$5,000
we,
the
staff,
has
reviewed
them
all
and
I'm
gonna
turn
my
phone
down
and
get
some
back
log
here
and
we
found
them
to
be
reasonable.
It
appears
that
they
have
covered
all
contingencies
on
the
process
of
decommissioning
and
we
would
recommend
that
the
County
Board
approved
these
decommissioning
plans
and
accept
a
bond
and
the
amount
specified
for
the
financial
security
of
the
decommissioning
plan.
A
They
know
I'm
back
I
just
had
a
quick
question
just
for
our
sake
of
the
the
pza
members
who
are
here
and
the
board
that
saw
the
previous
one
of
these.
Are
there
any
major
differences
between
the
decommissioning
plan
that
we've
already
approved,
and
you
might
have
already
talked
about
this
I
apologize
I
should
but
there
any
differences,
not.
K
A
J
D
A
A
N
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
This
one
is
relatively
straightforward,
so
this
is
a
under
rebuild
Illinois
and
I
know
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
and
have
talked
a
little
bit
about
few
to
talk
about
house.
The
state's
gonna
find
things
less.
Cars
on
the
road
means
less
dollars
in
the
transportation,
but
currently
we
do
have
an
open
grant
for
transportation
rural
transportation.
N
So
this
is
access
to
to
capital
as
a
capital,
assistance
grant
and
we've
been
working
with
show
bus
have
we
put
together
an
$85,000
project
which
is
a
single
duty,
paratransit
vehicle
and
then
mobile
radios
to
outfit
the
fleet.
We
were
talking
about
a
little
bit
internally,
even
though
the
radios
don't
seem
that
old,
they're
already
by
the
time
we
implement
this
program,
will
be
five
years
old.
So
this
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
get
fully
upgraded
radios
within
in
our
fleet
and
get
another
frontline
vehicle
to
offer
transportation.
N
So
we're
requesting
$82,000,
the
local
local
federal
required
shares
would
be
three
thousand
talk
with
Laura
quite
a
bit
about
it
and
she
believes,
within
the
current
budget,
we'll
be
able
to
absorb
that
without
needing
to
request
additional
funds.
How
many
too
often
I'll
set
that
so
this
is
a
zero-zero
request
from
from
the
county
board
from
for
finance
today,
and
hopefully
the
county
board
in
a
couple
weeks.
But
it's
our
intent
to
hold
a
public
hearing
on
May
11th.
N
A
N
Do
not
expect
it
I
mean
because
we
get
local
local
service
agreements
with
two
of
the
townships
and
funds
like
that
can
be
utilized
as
our
local
match.
So
we're
capping
the
total
expenditure
from
the
county
at
the
fifteen
thousand
that
was
approved
when
we
went
through
the
5311
and
oh
and
we're
not
requesting
any
more
for
this.
Okay.
A
B
E
N
A
D
A
A
But
no
the
courthouse
update
the
left
portion
of
the
front
steps
have
been
read,
they've
been
done
and
been
leveled
and
we're
doing
the
right
portion
of
the
steps,
because
we
couldn't
do
them
all
at
once,
because
we
still
had
to
get
in
and
out.
Apparently,
I
haven't
been
up
to
the
judge,
Albirex
courtroom,
but
apparently
that's
almost
done
as
well.
The
carpets
been
put
down
everything
is
almost
ready
to
go
in
the
a
DA
courtroom.
We
have
the
you
know
all
the
caulking
and
sealing
will
happen
at
that
point.
A
We've
we
skim
coded
a
couple
of
the
walls
that
were
really
deteriorated.
Coming
out
of
the
jury
assembly
area.
Coming
back
up
the
steps.
I,
don't
know
if
you've
been
down
there
and
if
you
have,
you
definitely
remember
being
down
there
in
jury
assembly,
but
you
know
that
wall
was
in
bad
disrepair.
We
fixed
that
we've
also
fixed
the
ramp
coming
in
to
the
courthouse,
and
that
has
been
cleaned
up,
we're
looking
at
the
the
railing
on
it
as
well
and
getting
that
cleaned
up
and
painted.
A
So
it
looks
nice
and
then
the
circle
drive
in
the
back
I
believe
they've
got
the
curb
down.
Now
all
the
way
around
that
they've
got
the
new
curb
and
they're
working
on
the
sidewalk.
When
that's
done,
obviously
we'll
be
doing
the
be
able
to
pay
the
the
asphalt
on
that
Circle
Drive.
We
will
have
to
come
back
and
do
the
apron,
because
the
you
know
the
it's,
not
the
state's
fault.
It's
just
the
way
things
are
working
on
timing
and
us
bumping.
This
up.
A
We've
got
to
get
some
permits
from
the
the
state
on
fixing
that
apron,
because
that
it's
technically
in
the
right-of-way
of
a
state
route,
so
with
some
traffic
things
we're
working
through
and
Ben
and
Mark
have
been
working
on
that.
So
we
don't
there
are,
there
are
no
problems.
It
just
may
be
a
delay
on
that
last
little
portion
and
that's
probably
the
way
we
left
it
right
now.
A
We
were
hoping
that
they
can
fast-track
this,
because
it's
really
it's
not
that
big
of
a
deal,
but
there
is
a
process,
so
we're
thinking
here,
at
least
with
the
majority
of
the
work
should
be
done
here
and
in
the
next
really
couple
of
weeks,
and
we
will
have
met
the
Attorney
General's
requirements
and
I
ad
a
after
a
long,
a
long
bat
not
battle
just
process.
If
you
will
ten
years
or
so,
and
so
will
we're
gonna
do
something.
As
far
as
you
know,
I
don't
know,
ribbon
cutting.
A
That's
usually
not
my
thing,
but
we're
gonna
do
something
and
we're
talking
to
the
Bar
Association
over
there
and
maybe
have
a
business
after-hours
there
or
something.
So
the
public
can
see
what
we've
done.
So
that's
that's
about
the
best
update
we.
We
did
have
some
cost
overruns.
If
you
look
is
you
remember,
I
was
talking
about
the
the
supports
for
the
steps
being
deteriorated
and
basically
rusting
out
hundred-year-old
train
rails.
A
The
metal
had
deteriorated
so
we
had
to
build
that
up
and
we
poured
some
foundation
if
you
will
in
there
and
then
level
those
off,
but
I
have
been
in
conversations
with
representative
Parkhurst
and
we
are
slated
to
get
future
money
from
from
Grants
and
what
what
we've
done
is
we're
bumping
up
some
of
that
to
get
a
little
get
a
little
bit
of
that
early.
So
we
can,
you
know,
handle
some
of
these
cost
overruns.
It
was
about
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
overrun.
What
we
thought
it
was
going
to
be
based
on
those
steps.
A
So
from
a
financial
perspective,
we
still
had
a
you
know,
roughly
I
want
to
say
one
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
that
was
paid
for
with
a
grant
or
will
be
reimbursed,
hopefully
with
the
current
situation,
but
then
also,
we
had
a
little
bit
of
extra
cost
because
we
decided
to
do
the
the
pavement-
and
you
know
some
other
things
that
were
associated
with
that.
So
it's
about
the
best
update
I
got
unless
you
have
anything
talking
with
District.
A
A
Alrighty
then,
opening
on
the
farmland
review
committee,
one
opening
K
Barry
Gabriel
Area
Fire
Protection
District,
one
on
the
Essex
Township
Fire
Protection
District,
one
on
Grant
Park,
fire
protection,
one
opening
Kankakee
Township
Fire
Protection,
one
on
the
Otto
Township
Fire
Protection
District,
one
on
Pilate,
Fire,
Protection
District,
and
one
on
the
st.
and
Fire
Protection
District.
So
with
that,
as
there
a
motion
to
adjourn
so
be
it
mr.
house,
is
there
a
second.