►
From YouTube: Finance Committee Meeting 12/21/2020
Description
Finance Committee Meeting 12/21/2020 9:00 AM
A
B
A
D
B
A
I
have
no
request
for
public
comment.
There's
no
one
in
the
room
for
public
comments,
so
we'll
move
to
there's
no
presentations
approval
of
the
minutes
for
november
19th.
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
november
19th
minutes.
B
A
C
A
A
E
Start
out
with
the
sales
tax
report,
if
you
have
it
in
front
of
you
compared
to
a
year
ago,
there
was
a
nice
uptick
which
we
haven't
seen
for
very
few
months
this
year
as
far
as
being
higher,
but
I
will
point
out
the
last
five
months.
The
consistency,
I
think,
is
a
very
positive
thing
and
if
you
look
across,
if
you
have
the
report
in
front
of
you
for
september
and
go
back
to
fiscal
year,
14
look
at
15,
16,
17
and
18..
E
That
number
is
very
consistent
with
prior
fiscal
years
for
retail
months
of
september,
so
I
think
that's
encouraging
information,
even
though
we
are
running
for
the
year
lower.
I
think
the
consistency
is
encouraging,
something
that's
predictable.
At
least
then
we'll
keep
continuing
to
watch
it
as
far
as
the
others
use
tax
continues
again
consistent
and
very
similar
trend
over
the
last
five
months.
E
We
did
finish
out
and
have
a
final
for
our
pprt,
our
personal
property
replacement
tax.
Earlier
estimates
from
the
state
said
that
that
would
be
down
about
30
percent,
so
it
is
down,
but
11
is
better
than
some
of
the
projections
that
we
received
in
the
springtime
early
in
the
year
and
then
income
tax
ended
up.
We
also
were
warned
about
income
tax
potentially
being
negative.
We
ended
up
at
two
percent
increase.
E
So
overall
I
think
you
know.
For
the
most
part,
it's
a
positive
trend
and
I'm
sure
the
sheriff
would
have
updated
this,
I'm
not
sure
if
he
will
be
available
for
this
meeting
later,
but
you
know
he
can.
He
usually
keeps
everyone
up
to
speed
as
far
as
the
the
trending
and
stuff
for
the
for
the
bed
rental
program.
A
E
All
right
cash
flow,
wise
shown
not
only
through
the
end
of
november,
but
also
projecting
out
through
june
of
21.
so
may
and
june
of
21,
will
be
our
lowest
projected
cash
flow
months
of
the
year.
So
we're
watching
that
real
close,
I'm
hopeful
and
optimistic
that
what
is
trending
will
continue
to
trend.
However,
I
think
by
the
end
of
january,
which
is
a
three
payroll
month,
you
know
into
february.
E
If
we
need
to
discuss
if
we
run
into
a
possibility
of
needing
a
tew,
you
know
we
will
know
by
that
time
and
we'll
have
time
to
implement
it
if
needed
before
may
and
june.
E
The
months
of
may
and
june
show
up,
but
at
this
point
I
don't
believe
we'll
need
to,
but
we're
close
enough
or
we're
stable
right
now.
But
if
stable
were
to
change
anymore,
then
we
might
have
to
have
a
conversation,
but
right
now
it
doesn't
look
like
we
will,
but
I'm
not
going
to
put
that
as
a
solid,
no,
but
we're
cautiously
optimistic
that
we'll
be
able
to
make
it
through.
E
You
know
with
things
going
on,
so
everything
else
is
pretty
straightforward,
but
I'll
entertain.
Any
questions
if
anybody
has
any
further
cash
flow.
A
I'm
seeing
no
one
indicating
they
want
to
ask
a
question
we'll
move
ahead
with.
We
have
one
item
that
came
under
claims
not
recommended
for
approval
from
the
auditor
there's
documentation
explaining
the
basis
of
that
mr
mccarty.
Is
there
anything
you'd
want
to
say
on
that.
E
This
is
an
internal
transfer.
This
is
cure
funds.
E
It
comes
in
one
lump
sum:
we
deposit
it
into
the
general
fund
and
then
this
is
a
claim
to
move
it
to
a
fund
fund
355
outside
of
our
blended
cash
account
or
the
corner,
and
so
that
we're
just
simply
moving
money
that
we
received
from
one
fund
to
another
fund.
A
C
E
I'm
not
sure
what
that
means.
We've
sent
this
type
of
detail,
that's
attached,
you
know
with
all
of
these
transactions
that
are
cure-related
that
are
going
to
other
funds.
So
we've
done
this
in
the
past.
I
I'm
not
sure
how
to
answer
it.
E
F
We
need
him
to
do
this
kind
of
work.
That's
what
you
need
in
order
to
do
to
be
that
extra
set
of
eyes
on
and
it
creates
the
audit
trail,
the
separation
of
duties.
We
can't
just
have
one
person
move
stuff
around
without
someone
else
looking
at
it,
so
this
is
essential
I'll
just
mention
that
it's
only
50
bucks,
but
it's
stuff
like
this.
That
gets
a
red
flag.
F
B
C
A
A
C
A
C
A
We
moved
to
fiscal
year,
2020
special
fund
budget
amendment.
This
is
an
end
of
the
year
action.
Mr
mccarty,
would
you
like
to
speak
to
that.
E
Above
and
beyond
the
grant
that
we
received
the
recorder
computer
fund,
we
received
pre-authorization
from
dco
for
the
cure
grant
and
then
but
then
gloria
gageboy
started
the
project
and
then
we
paid
the
voice
showed
the
you
know
turned
everything
in
as
we
needed
to,
for
you
know
ovid-related
activity
and
then
once
the
committee
went
through
it
at
dco,
they
said
no,
but
one
of
the
initial
requirements
for
the
cure
grant
and
the
covet
activity
was
that
it
was
above
and
beyond
original
budget
activity
for
whether
it
was
department
or
fund.
E
You
know
whatever
activity
that
it
caused
expense
to
be
above
and
beyond
what
you
originally
expected.
So
this
falls
completely
in
that
category.
Unfortunately,
they
declined
to
reimburse
us
for
that
activity,
but,
as
you
can
see,
there
is
funds
available
in
there.
The
ending
fund
balance
is
has
enough
to
cover
the
project
that
she
that
she
started.
That
was
covered
related
there,
and
then
there
are
some.
You
know
various
reasons.
The
other
reasons
have
related
to
kobit
and
then
the
court
security
fund.
E
There
are
additional
funds
with
the
new
fees
schedule
that
went
into
place
and
thus
they
are
able
to
do
additional
activities
there
for
for
court
security
related
issues.
So
else
there's
any
other
specific.
Just
a
reminder
that
a
budget
amendment
takes
two-thirds
vote
from
the
full
board
to
amend.
A
D
E
You
know
well
we're
watching
that
very
closely,
we'll
see
what
comes
out
I'm
hearing
that
there's
a
new
package
and
we'll
have
to
do
the
research
on
that
to
see
so
we're
hopeful.
But
I
don't
have
anything
specific
to
report
to
you
yet.
Okay,.
F
I
will
say
the
opposite:
the
opposite
could
happen,
cash
bail
that
could
go
away
and
it
would
put
a
monumental
stress
on
the
court
systems
and
because
we've
already
are
dealing
with
bail
reform
and
we've
seen
the
revenues
that
support
all
the
you
know
the
people
working
at
the
courthouse,
all
the
programs,
the
state's
attorney,
has
on
diversion
everything
that
we've
got
going
on
over
there.
F
You
know
they've
they've,
taken
the
ability
away,
springfield
has
of
us
being
able
to
collect
fines
and
fees,
and
if
that
cash
bail
goes
away,
it
puts
us
in
serious
jeopardy.
So
again,
that's
not
a
revenue
question,
but
that's
a
cost
that
allows.
I
don't
know
how
we
would
pay
for
everything.
If,
if
that
goes
away,
there
would
have
to
be
adjustments.
F
E
Well,
my
mind
went
to
federal
initially
but
yeah
from
a
state
level
yeah.
We
always
have
to
keep
an
eye
on
that
as
well.
A
E
D
C
A
We
move
if
I
could
have
a
motion
to
adjust
the
agenda
and
move
up
the
old
business
that
has
executive
session
motion
to
move.
The
agenda
is
our
second
second
by
mr
hess,
mr
wheeler
moved
to
move
that
agenda
item
mr
hess.
Second,
all
in
favor
of
that
say,
aye
aye.
A
B
A
E
F
C
E
A
A
A
If
there
is
no
questions,
we
have
a
motion
to
approve
these
are
reports,
so
let's
have
a
roll
call
on
zoom.
Mr.
C
C
E
A
F
Provide
some
perspective
on
something
I
number
some
numbers
were
ran
by
finance
for
me,
we're
looking
at
the
impact
of
covert
this
year
in
housing.
It
looks
like
the
revenue
side
of
the
u.s
marshals.
Service
was
off
by
18,
and
the
revenue
of
dhs
ice
was
off
by
48.
F
F
So
it's
it's
a
little
bit
different
situation
now
with
5.1
versus
2.4,
respectively,
so
you're,
starting
to
see
where
the
we
get
more
revenue
from
the
marshals
than
we
do
from
ice.
So
if,
in
fact
we
see
any
changes
coming,
it
may
more.
Look
like
this
is
the
new,
a
new
normal,
a
more
new
normal,
just
least
a
picture
to
take
what
that
would
look
like.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments
on
this
scene
done.
We
have
nothing
from
the
auditor's
office,
we'll
move
to
other
business.
The
audit
engagement
letter,
mr
wheeler,
would
you
want
to
speak
to
that.
D
D
A
All
right
moving
on
un
under
the
other
business,
the
audit
engagement
letter,
mr
weaver.
F
Basically,
this
is
the
letter
every
year
that
we
obviously
have
to
engage
our
outside
auditors
to
come
in
and
check
our
internal
controls,
our
systems
to
satisfy
state
and
federal,
grant
requirements
and
other
things
that
we
need
to
to
have
done
throughout
the
year.
That's
one
of
the
major
tasks,
so
this
is
in
form
and
substance.
Exactly
the
same
as
previous
years,
steve
same
as
last
year,.
E
The
dollar
amounts
are
the
same
and
the
approach
you
know
the
the
structure
of
it
there's
nothing
major
exchange
with
gatsby
or
any
other
item.
So
it's
it's
pretty
straightforward.
A
E
They
will
probably
test
that
or
put
it
against
the
other
grant
revenue
that
we
receive
and
it's
it's
all
about.
A
percentage
of
you
know
activity
so
that
might
you
know,
make
a
difference
in
their
approach,
but
it'll
be
part
of
their
grand
activity,
their
their
normal
grand
activity.
I
don't
believe
it'll
be
a
above
and
beyond
or
an
addition
to.
A
Are
there
let's
get
a
motion
on
the
table?
Is
there
a
motion
to
approve
this
audit
engagement
letter?
Mr
kissinger,
mr
hunter
seconds,
all
right
is
there
other
discussion
on
the
engagement.
A
A
A
B
E
A
C
F
I
I
apologize
in
our
marathon
first
session.
I
forgot
about
something
for
executive
committee,
most
of
the
people
here
on
both,
but
it's
relevant.
We've
been
given
line,
item
appropriation
of
a
million
dollars
for
cost
associated
with
the
kanke
river
dredging,
and
it's
a
grant.
That's
something!
Senator
joyce
worked
on
to
go
along
with
our
400
thousand
dollars
for
the
courthouse.
F
We
are
at
least
going
through
some
capital
for
lack
of
a
better
term
gains
if
you
will
in
in
the
area,
and
so
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
a
meeting
with
the
courts
on
that
to
decide
what
they
think
the
priorities
are.
As
far
as
accessibility
in
the
courthouse
I'll
be
meeting,
this
is
a
county
grant,
we're
going
to
be
meeting
with
those
people
associated
with
the
river.
F
I
kind
of
know
where
I
think
it's
probably
going
to
end
up
it's
a
life,
health
safety
issue
with
aroma
park
and
the
river
being
choked
off,
and
they
can't
even
get
the
rescue
boat
in
the
water.
That
may
be
where
we
go,
because
it's
definitely
not
enough
to
dredge
sections
of
the
river,
and
sometimes
you
don't
want
to
do
that.
It
makes
it
worse,
but
just
letting
the
committee
know
we're
going
to
start
that
process
because
it,
the
paperwork,
has
to
be
filled
out.
F
So
it's
kind
of
a
big
deal
you
know
and
and
we
roma
park
didn't,
have
the
money.
Roma
township
fire
didn't
have
the
money
park.
District
didn't
have
the
money,
but
maybe
this
will
fill
the
gap
so
more
to
come
on
that.
But
I
thought
it
was
good
news
for
everybody.
F
So
what
in
my
head,
though,
if
we
are
going
to
have
a
more
active
role
in
river
maintenance
as
what
we
want
to
do
going
through
the
down
the
road,
maybe
the
highway
department
with
the
skill
operating
engineers
that
they
have,
if
we
end
up
having
our
own
equipment,
might
be
the
place
to
house
the
actual
doing
the
work
ourselves.
D
Mr
hunter
yeah-
and
I
understand,
mr
chairman,
that
there
could
be
some
commercial
use
for
that
saying
as
well
too.
F
Not
so
much
no
problem,
yeah,
that's
the
problem.
There
is
there's,
there's
been
multiple
studies,
the
commercial
use
that
we've
identifying
is
tilling
it
into
the
soil
and
those
soils
that
are
very
rich.
That
could
use
a
little
bit
of
sand,
but
that's
you
can't
for
not
for
concrete,
not
for
believe
it
or
not.
The
landfill
people
thought
it
was
the
perfect
kind
of
sand
for
the
vet
of
a
landfill.
But
beyond
that.