►
From YouTube: Redistricting Committee Meeting 05/28/2021
Description
Redistricting Committee Meeting 05/28/2021 9:00 AM
A
A
A
B
A
A
I
have
one
request
here
for
public
comment.
I
hit
eight
right.
A
A
C
Okay,
good
morning,
everyone
good
morning.
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
However,
she
stated
it
was
too
late
at
that
point
to
stop
the
implementation
after
current
proposals,
I
would
point
out
that
the
full
census
data
is
not
available
due
the
trump
administration's
handling
of
the
census
maps
are
based
on
population
estimates
there
were,
for.
There
is
no
way
to
know
those
masks
meet
the
legal
requirements
of
roughly
equal-sized
districts.
C
A
D
A
E
So
yeah
this
is
the
the
version
a
it
has
subtle
changes.
I
will
click
on
the
current
county
board.
Excuse
me.
E
There
are
subtle
changes.
I
will
click
on
the
current
county
board
boundaries.
You'll
see
some
changes
over
here.
I
was
basically
an
attempt
to
tighten
up
some
of
the
more
gerrymandered
areas.
If
you
will
to
borrow
a
phrase.
You
know
these
odd
shapes
that
were
in
there
is
a
very.
It
was
just
the
first
attempt
very
slight
if
you
will
so,
if
there's
no
questions
with
that
I'll
go
ahead,
and
just
you
know
it's
basically
what
we
have
with
a
few
little
cleanups
and
there's
more.
That
could
have
been
done.
E
F
And
andy,
could
you
just
generalize
the
modifications,
no
matter
how
my
new
they
may
be.
E
Sure
there
was
mostly
down
along
maple
street
because
there
were
some
dips
back
into
the
neighborhoods
in
district
18,
17
15.
F
Okay,
so
are
you
saying
that
you're
going
up
maple
is
the
dividing
line
or
what
yes.
E
E
Yeah
out
here
in
this
area
there,
it
is
a
few
census
tracts
out
in
this
area
to
more
balance
the
numbers
so
very
slight
modifications,
more
just
a
solid
boundary.
Actually,
this
little
strange
area
in
district
five
that
was
in,
I
believe,
which
district
three
three
yeah.
So
this
area
right
here
they
were
protrusions
that
didn't
necessarily
make
a
lot
of
sense,
just
squaring
those
off
to
natural
boundaries
as
well
so
and
from
there.
I
thought
well,
there's
more
work
that
can
be
done.
E
E
I'll
click
on
the
current
board
districts-
and
you
see
like
we
still
have
that
situation,
but
instead
of
this
boundary
and
this
boundary,
I
used
river
street
going
straight
across
because
it
was
somewhat
cutting
through
these
areas.
If
you
see
how
this
cuts
through
neighborhoods
and
things
like
that,
it
was
more
okay,
let's
square
this
off
into
that
natural
boundary,
and
then
also
do
some
of
that
as
well
in
this
area
here.
A
E
Of
the
microphone
that
might
help-
and
so
you
see
some
of
the
way
the
boundaries
were,
and
it's
pretty
self-explanatory
there,
so
it
was
to
to
get
through
some
of
the
neighborhood
twists
and
turns
that
you
saw
on
the
map
again
a
continuation
of
what
existed.
So,
if
there's
no
questions
about
this,
it's
pretty
self-explanatory.
I'll
move
on
to
c
c
was
again
just
a
furtherance
of
what
we
were
doing
there.
E
And
applying
it
to
other
areas
to
compact,
so
it
left
those
pretty
much
alone.
The
way
they
were.
We
addressed
23,
because
if
you
remember
I'll
show
you
the
current
district
lines,
this
was
another
area
where
it
kind
of
jogged
through
neighborhoods
in
this
area,
still
left
all
of
that
alone,
but
also
looked
at
this
district
on
compacting,
this
22
and
25,
as
well
with
natural
straight
line
boundaries
and
got
rid
of
this
little
niche.
E
If
you
will
and
and
by
the
way,
each
and
every
one
of
these
balances
on
population
correct,
you
know,
that's
how
you
could
have
a
county
that
could
vote
40
in
one
particular
presidential
election,
but
those
populations
could
be
concentrated
in
certain
parts
of
the
town.
Okay,
so
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
gerrymandering
to
get
an
outcome
on
the
county
board,
because
you
can't
make
up
where
people
live.
A
E
From
the
other
district-
and
it
could
be
like,
if
you
see
where
the
mouse
is
out
here
in
the
white
area
to
the
left,
there
could
be
like
three
houses
out
there
in
that
big
big
block
of
area.
But
if
you
go
in
town
there
could
be
an
apartment
building
on
that
block.
You
just
don't
know
until
you
know
so
this
wasn't
just
like
you
know,
drawing
a
map
on
a
piece
of
paper,
and
you
know
there
were
no
consulting
with
voters
or
anything
like
that.
It
was
where
do
people
live?
E
That's
what
this
is
based
on.
So
if
there's
no
questions
about
this
one
I'll
move
on
to
the
next
one
and
by
the
way
we
can
come
back
and
do
this.
If
you
want
to
dive
into
something
about.
E
Man,
I'm
on
to
d
yep,
so
d
was
just
the
same
thing.
You
know,
building
on
what
we
I've
already
talked
about,
but
then
I
I
said
well:
we've
got
three
county
board
members
in
moments.
What
would
it
look
like
if
there
was
just
one
county
board
member
over
the
moment
or
four
yeah
you're
right
with
the
same
on
the
southern
part
right
and
they
mean
to
sell
you
short
there
apologize,
so
it
was
looking
at.
It
was
the
same
thing
we
were
talking
about,
but,
okay,
how
do
I
get
it?
E
So
there's
not
so
many
county
board
representatives
and
it
wasn't
an
attempt
to
divide
moments.
It
was
because
each
of
these
districts
needed
population.
When
you
have
that
anchor
of
of
sun
river
terrace
and
hawkins
park
it.
It
dictates
how
the
rest
of
the
stuff
around
it
goes,
and
so,
when
you
have
a
majority
minority
district
that
you
must
pay
attention
to,
then
you
have
to
kind
of
build
off
of
that
and
this
it
speaks
to
why
momentum
might
have
been
divided
up
in
the
past.
It
was
to
grab
that
population.
E
Well,
there
was
another
way
to
look
at
it,
and
so
I
did
that
and
it
forced
five
to
which
was
already
a
rural
district
to
become
fully
rural
and
go
all
the
way
up
to
the
will
county
line,
because
again
that
one
has
to
have
population
balance
with
all
the
others.
So
if
there
was
any
questions
about
this
one,
I
could
try
to
answer
them.
Then.
A
E
I
forgot
about
that.
I
apologize
that
on
this
map.
It
was
another
way
to
represent
15
and
13.
This
used
to
be
13
over
here
and
14..
It
was
just
a
different
way
to
map
that
area
based
on
the
river
being
a
natural
boundary
there
and
river
street.
If
you
will,
you
know
so,
you
see
nice
straight
lines
where,
before
not
so
much
see
what
I'm
talking
about.
E
E
Really
two
and
a
half
I
would
like
to
say,
like
mr
payton's
district,
that
he
currently
occupies
would
still
have
a
small
portion
of
southern
moments,
but
this
is
just
another
way
to
basically
have
two
reps
over
that
area,
that
the
town
and
then
it
extends
you
know
five
would
stay
the
same,
obviously
to
the
last
one.
We
have
it's
to
me.
It
was
a
more
compact
version
of
the
last
idea
if
you
will,
with
the
least
amount
of
disruption
as
possible.
E
So
with
that,
I
guess
you
can
ask
me
any
questions
or
debate
or
talk
or
comment
or
what.
F
Mr
hunter
yeah
guys
come
on.
I
don't
want
to
ask
all
these
questions,
but
commissioner
payton,
looking
at
e,
is
that
a
better
fit
for
you
in
terms
of
not
having
so
much
of
moments.
F
A
F
Yeah
mr
hunter
yeah
just
to
follow
up
mr
chairman,
chairman
wheeler
regarding
maps,
and
I
I
would
tend
to
concur
with
mr
payton
regarding
his
comments
and
I'm
I'm
going
to
support
his
opinion.
F
As
he
knows
this
better
than
than
all
of
us.
I
would
think,
mr
chairman
wheeler,
in
terms
of
c
you
had
some
discussion
about
that,
and
could
you
just
encapsulate
it's
a
brief
overview
of
c
again
because
it
appeared
from
the
head
nods
of
people
here
they
tended
to
agree
with
map
c.
E
The
major
difference
is
the
way
that
district
five
and
two
and
one
and
four
inter-relate-
that's
that's
the
major
difference
between
c
and
e,
there's
a
few
other
minor
ones,
but
that's
the
the
majority
of
the
differences.
It's
I
guess
you
could
say
it's
it's
a
different
way
to
approach
moments.
Area
five
still
keeps
part
of
moments
and
then
excuse
me
in
28c
and
in
28e.
Five
goes
all
the
way
to
the
border
of
will
county
correct
and
it
leaves
moments
to
basically
two
people
to
cover
that
area.
Right.
A
Okay
and
once
again,
just
as
a
reminder,
we
have
federal
voting
rights
that
we
have
to
take
into
consideration.
So
basically,
the
map
has
always
started
down
in
in
district
four
and
it's
moved
out
from
there.
So
if
we
make
changes
on
the
east
side
the
county,
then
it
shifts
everything
over
to
the
west
side.
A
F
A
I
I
F
A
He
suggested
we
go
for
all,
but
no
but
yeah.
We
I'm
a
firm
believer.
If
we
give
them
the
decision,
two
would
be
an
opportune
number
to
come
up
with
I
mean
we've
been
over
the
maps.
We've
made
decisions,
I
personally
don't
think
a
is
feasible
and
I
don't
I
personally
don't
think
b
is
feasible
or
not
feasible.
They
are
feasible,
but
the
way
they're
still
cut
up
a
little
bit
when
you
get
down
to
c
d
and
e
they're
much
more
precise
than
everything.
I
A
F
Therefore-
and
I
I
concur
with
the
chairman's
comments
additionally,
the
the
comments
that
chairman
wheeler
provided
this
is
the
bible.
Here,
you
know
this
is
yeah.
This
is
empirical
evidence
here
and
that's
what
you
look
at
when
you,
when
you
take
a
look
at
what
the
chairman
just
indicated,
the
voting
rights
act
and
that's
what
you
got
to
comply
with
you've
heard
corporation
council
indicate
that
as
well
too.
F
F
I'm
of
the
opinion,
I
concur
with
the
comments
that
have
been
made
of
the
chairman
and
the
co-chairman
and
the
comments
that
chairman
wheeler
has
indicated
and
again
I
come
back
to
this
and
this
is
like
heaven
sent
which
helps
us.
Therefore,
mr
chairman,
I
I
would
move
to
eliminate
and
dismiss
maps
a
b
and
d
and
move
forward
maps
c
and
e
again.
F
My
motion
is
to
dismiss
a
b
and
d
and
move
forward
for
consideration
to
the
full
board
maps
c,
as
in
cat
e,
is
in
eat.
H
J
I
think
that
I
support
mr
hunter's
decision
there
and
I
think
that
going
forward
with
five
maps
would
be
a
disservice
to
the
full
board
when
there's
clearly
a
feeling
in
the
room.
So
to
speak,
that
people
are
leaning
towards
the
the
lower
maps,
the
d
and
the
e's,
and
I
I
think
we
can
eliminate
a
few
of
these
safely
without
hurting
anybody's
feelings.
And
I
think
a
vote
will
show
that.
G
E
If
you
look
at
where
housing
permits
were
you'll,
see
change
in
the
mantino
area,
you'll
see
change
in
northern
bourbon,
a
change
in
the
hopkins
park
area
increases,
but
that
doesn't
count
renters
who
have
moved.
So
it's
the
the
state
law
says.
Unlike
the
the
state
house
and
the
state
senate,
and
even
the
congressional
seats
we
are
mandated
to
use
the
last
census,
they
can
use
other
things.
We
can
only
use
the
last
census
so
any
way
around
it.
E
If
they
do
say
if
they
change
the
law
and
say
now,
you
can
redo
your
maps
based
on
the
census
in
september,
which
I
don't
see
happening,
but
if
they
do
it'll
be
work
on
any
side
of
it.
It's
I
I
I
it's
nice.
We
have
a
technological
tool
to
help,
but
I
think
either
one
either
c
or
e
they're
similar
enough.
That
would
allow
us
to
move
the
lines,
but
there
would
be
disruption.
I
just
can't
say
where
it's
it's
a
tough!
Yes,
because
it
does.
No
information
really
tells
you
where
the
renters
went.
G
I
Featherweight,
I
know
I
made
the
most
second
the
motion
and
stuff,
but
is
there?
Is
there
any
housing
starts
now
that
are
up
there
or
any
note
of
any
housing
starts
in
hopkins
park
or
mantino
I
mean
do
you
have
you
have
no
idea
about
the
permits
unless
it's
in
the
unincorporated
areas
right,
because
we
really
don't
have
a
lot
of
lots
around.
K
That
we
actually
we
periodically
get
the
housing
starts
for
the
municipalities
as
well.
Okay,.
K
Mr
wheeler
indicated
the
data
we
have
shows
that
those
areas
there
have
had
new
houses
in
the
last
10
years
and
in.
I
The
mantino
area,
I
know
we're
running
low
on
lots,
but
it
would
take
a
year
to
get
any
more
put
in
so
or
two
to
get
any
more
lots
put
in.
They
seem
to
be
developing
like
10
lots
at
a
time
nobody's
coming
in
and
making
huge
subdivisions
anymore.
It's
going
to
knock
it
way
out
of
whack
where
somebody's
building
you
know
150
homes
out
on
you
know,
career
center
or
something
like
that.
That's
not
happening.
I
don't
see
it
happening.
I've
been
on
planning
in
the
area
for
years.
I
A
I
I
E
K
A
F
E
Know,
actually
let
me
let
me,
let
me
show
you
something
here
actually
before
we
go
because
there,
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
ask
dell
to
clean
these
up
to
make
sure
there's
no
little
like
islands
out
in
the
middle
of
somewhere
that
that
need
to
be
cleaned
up
like
it
didn't
get
clicked
on,
or
you
know
something
that
doesn't
change
the
map,
but
it's
just
and
here's
an
example,
and-
and
this
is
after
me
talking
to
to
dan
hendrickson
and-
and
I'm
glad
is
this
still-
is
this
e?
E
Well,
it
doesn't
matter
I'll
still
show
you
and
I'm
talking
about
this
area
over
by
river
lane.
When
I
click
on
the
the
township
line.
Okay,
this
little
space
over
here
would
cause
there's
a
couple
of
houses.
There
would
cause
dan
to
have
to
print
like
five
ballots
for
that
one
precinct
out
there,
okay,
so
what
what
we
would
do
is
is
is
we're
going
to
go
through
and
correct
a
couple
of
these.
This
one
is
correct
up
here,
because
that
would
go
to
the
I
believe
the
housing
authority
is
that
voting
place
over
there.
E
E
E
Five,
so
so
it's
not
just
we're
not
just
hanging
a
couple
things
out
there,
so
we're
going
to
go
around
and
kind
of
clean
up
the
edges
a
little
bit
like
that,
where
they
cross
and
dan
will
be
part
of
that
process
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
cost
him
a
bunch
of
extra
work
on
the
precinct
side
of
things.
For
no
reason,
but
that's
just
an
example.
It's
not
that's
not
tried
and
true,
but
let
me
get
back
up
mr
hunter.
F
F
That's
why
I
posed
a
question
to
mr
wheeler
and
to
you,
mr
chair,
with
all
due
respect
now
we're
gonna
go
ahead
with
a
full
board
a
week
from
next
tuesday
correct
and
unless
these
guys,
who
are
not
on
zoom,
have
been
keeping
up
with
this.
F
I
don't
want
to
have
to
go
through
a
three
or
four
hour
meeting
regarding
the
stuff
that
we've
been
able
to
do,
and
I
think
we've
done
a
really
good
job
in
terms
of
expediting
this
process,
with
the
assistance
of
planner,
as
well
as
other
individuals
who
are
had
some
input
into
this
particular
document.
F
You
know
again,
this
empirical
stuff
really
helps
out,
I'm
not
sure
if
they
have
this
in
their
their
hands.
Although
it's
it's
available,
I'm
not
sure
if
my
rest
of
our
colleagues
have
been
able
to
review
this
stuff
and
keep
up
with
the
discussion
that
all
of
you
guys
have
presented
in
terms
of
questions
and
the
feedback
we've
gotten.
F
All
I'm
saying
is
that
I
hope
we
don't
have
to
do
a
laborious,
a
laborious
task
of
starting
back
at
point
a
in
order
to
get
to
the
point
z
like
this
committee
has
done
so
that's
that's
all
I'm
saying
I'm
just
hoping
there
could
be
some
kind
of
comprehensive,
concentrated
presentation
by
the
the
board
chair
regard
and,
and
also
mr
rowe,
who
has
given
us
advice
in
terms
of
this
process.
F
E
E
But
once
in
a
while
you'll
see
like
a
little
splotch
out
here
that
wasn't
assigned
to
a
district,
it
could
be
a
creek
you
know,
but
we're
going
to
go
through
and
make
sure
that
everything
is
absolutely
perfect
and
that's
with
dell's
assistance,
making
sure
that
we're
on
the
right
sides
of
of
streets
and
things
like
that.
It
won't.
It
won't
change
the
numbers
numbers.
E
You
know
over
that
that
a
lot,
but
we
just
want
a
little
bit
of
time
to
clean
up,
because
we
could
have
done
that
for
five
different
maps
and
spent
weeks
doing
that
now
we
know
what
your
intention
is:
we'll
focus
on
those
two
and
just
not
changing
it,
but
just
making
sure
they're
cleaning
wires,
yeah
just
cleaning
it
up.
If
there
is
anything
yeah.
F
Yeah,
mr
hunter
yeah.
Thank
you.
I
like
that
and
and
you've
heard
the
the
comments
from
our
county
clerk
as
well
too.
Possibly,
mr
chairman,
let
me
say
this
to
you
in
order
to
expedite
this
matter
at
the
full
county
board
meeting
that
that
tuesday,
how
about
I'm
just
a
suggestion?
A
committee
of
the
whole,
in
terms
of
the
little
minutia,
the
items
that
you
said
in
terms
of
cleaning
up
that
way,
everybody
hears
the
same
thing
and
all
we
have
to
do
tuesday
is
you
know.
E
What
I'm
saying?
Well,
I
guess,
by
definition
the
full
board
is
a
committee
of
the
whole,
so
they'll
be
able
to
do
it
all
together.
At
the
same
time,
you
know
so
that
that
we
could,
we
could
sit
there
and
si
and
you
know,
go
through
the
presentation
and
say
you
know
we
did
find
a
couple
of
precincts
that
we
moved
by
and
identify
them
like
just
like
in
the
one
with
we
were
speaking
with
miss
parker.
E
If
dan
feels
that
that's
an
issue
where
we're
printing
two
ballots
for
one
precinct,
that
it
should
be
in
the
other,
township
save
the
taxpayers,
money,
say
people
which,
where
do
I
go
vote
that
kind
of
stuff,
then
we'll
we'll
just
mention
that.
F
E
E
I
don't
see
that
happening
because
what
we're
talking
about
I
wish
I
could
knew
offhand,
but
we've
got
to
really
go
through
with
a
fine-tooth
comb
and
make
sure
that,
like
when
you
click
on
a
census
block,
sometimes
there's
a
little.
It
makes
no
sense
they're
not
square.
Sometimes
it's
really
drifting
in.
F
F
K
Let's
just
pull
up
c
for
now:
okay
tool,
redistricting
planet
integrity.
You
can
go
through
and
find
unassigned
areas
in
this
one.
There
are
no
unassigned
areas
a
lot
of
times,
there's
little
sliver
census
blocks,
that'll
have
zero
population,
but
because
it's
jammed
between
a
road
and
a
creek,
it's
its
own
census
block
when
you're
sitting
there
clicking
on
these,
you
don't
necessarily
find
them
unless
you're
zooming
way
in
the
software
lets.
K
K
Those
are
some
of
the
tools
that
we
can
use.
Oh
that's
unassigned
areas
that
we
to
clean
up
the
map.
Now
this
is
not
gonna
find
those
areas
that
mr
wheeler
talked
about,
where
there's
just
a
sliver
over
a
township
or
something
if
it
is
assigned
to
a
district,
those
you
have
to
actually
visually
look
for.
E
D
Ahead,
mr
ng,
I've
taken
the
liberty
of
printing
off
all
sets
of
the
district
maps
for
for
all
five
of
the
maps
and
the
only
spot
that
I've
seen
is
that
one
that
you
had
just
shown
on
the
the
screen
a
little
bit
earlier,
that
that
small
section
of
aroma
township
that
was
in
a
county
board
district
on
its
own?
D
If
that's
addressed,
I
don't
see,
I
don't
see
anything
and
I
would
defer
to
delbert
to
see
if
he
sees
anything
that
would
be
an
outlier,
but
I
don't
see
anything
else
that
would
cause
any
consternation.
On
my
end,
great.
E
B
A
A
I
I
have
two
things
here:
I'd
like
to
thank
our
planning
department,
dilbert
and
daniel
downstairs.
We've
provided
us
with
maps
and
what
we
can
answer
got
questions
answered.
You
can
click
here
and
click
there
and
make
things
happen.
I
know
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this,
so
I'd
like
to
thank
them
and
and
on
the
up
and
up
for
you
know
daniel
and
the
gis
department.