►
From YouTube: Redistricting Committee Meeting 05/24/2021
Description
Redistricting Committee Meeting 05/24/2021 9:00 AM
A
A
A
A
B
D
We
have
that
powerpoint
first.
A
We
want
the
districts
shall
be
comprised
of
contiguous
territory
as
nearly
compact
as
practical
practicable
districts
may
divide,
townships
and
municipalities.
Only
when
necessary
to
conform
with
the
population
requirement.
That's
the
plus
or
minus
shall
be
created
in
such
a
manner
that
no
precinct
shall
be
divided
into
two
or
more
districts.
D
Chairman,
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
discuss
it,
but
I
would
say:
does
that
look
compact
to
you
what's
on
the
screen?
Does
that
look
gerrymandered?
Does
that
look
fair,
because
that's
what
the
illinois
house
just
put
out
as
our
legislative
map?
So
when
you
see
ours,
you'll
notice
a
stark
difference,
something
that's
done
jointly
together
in
the
light
of
day,
and
then
you
have
something
now
which
is
frankly
disgusting.
D
F
Maps
like
that
for
the
state
yeah.
Well,
you
know
sorry,
it
comes
out
of
the
legislature
and
then
at
some
point
someone
can
contest
it
and
it
would
go
to
the
courts
so
initially
a
local
court.
Then
an
appellate
court.
F
Usually,
once
the
map
passes,
then
the
party
would
have
to
go
to
court.
They
could
file
for
maybe
a
restraining
order
or
an
injunction
to
prevent
implementation
of
the
map,
at
least
in
the
upcoming
election
cycle,
but
that's
all
up
to
a
court
whether
they
would
grant
that
or
not
so
they
can
go
and
they
can
contest
it.
They
can
say
it's
unfair.
They
can
ask
a
court
to
sort
of
hold
it
in
abeyance
before
it
would
go
into
effect
for
a
electoral
cycle,
but
whether
they
stop
it,
whether
it's
ultimately
upheld
or
not.
F
E
A
G
And,
and
and
in
terms
of
the
elimination
you
know
prior
to
the
meeting
commencing,
I
mean
there's
some
well.
How
can
they
phrase
this.
G
One
of
the
maps
may
not
be
viable
due
to
the
possibility
of
not
passing
the
smell
test,
as
well
as
the
empirical
evidence
which
they
have
there,
which
the
voting
rights
act
and
the
other
stuff
that
was
mentioned
may
cause
some
consternation
and
a
possibility
of
it
being
thrown
out
correct.
Okay,.
D
D
Is
there
if
it's
largely
considering
that
we
do
not
have
any
adjustments
in
population
because
we
don't
have
census
back
yet,
so
the
effort
was
made
to
just
straighten
out
the
lines
make
it
more
compact
make
sure
everything
was
not
gerrymandered
if
there
was
a
chance
to
update
and
make
it
better
that
was
kind
of
the
spirit
of
how
these
were
attacked.
If
you
will
and
then
things
can
change
based
on
the
committee
desires,
obviously
so
the
first
map
like
as
mentioned,
is
largely
the
same.
D
I
did
look
at
a
few
things
and
I'll
use
this
as
an
example
to
show
what
are
the
limitations
of
the
process
if
we
could
zoom
in
like
into
kanken
key,
if
you
will
so,
if
you
look
at
these
lines
and
go
ahead
and
click
on
current
county
board
28
right
here,
you
see
the
lines,
the
red
lines
that
pop
up
there,
and
mainly
in
the
areas
where
we're
talking
about
that
are
somewhat.
I
won't
say,
gerrymandered,
but
not
necessarily
following
straight
lines
with
natural
demarcation.
D
D
Then
we
could
change
this
and
we
could
you
know
that's
the
way
these
maps
are
kind
of
generated,
but
this
is
a
an
example
of
kind
of
the
way
that
it
is
laid
out
right
now
with
a
few
adjustments
in
17
and
18..
That
was
basically
and
15
of
the
lines.
The
way
they
all
come
together
over
here.
It
doesn't
really
change
much
just
kind
of
defines
things
a
little
bit
straighter.
D
So
the
one
thing
I
did
want
to
kind
of
use
in
this
map
to
kind
of
demonstrate
is
is
that
these
are
all
by
census,
tracts,
okay,
and
so,
when
you
see
an
area
in
16,
which
is
the
briarcliff
area
over
here,
people
would
say
why
is
that
little
bulge
sitting
there
on
the
side?
Why
isn't
that
not
a
straight
line?
Well,
the
the
way
to
to
kind
of
describe
it
is
to
kind
of
show
you
what
what
the
the
limitations
are
of
this
process
and
how
you
have
to
focus
on
population.
D
With
this
street
over
here,
you
can.
These
are
all
census
tracts
in
this
neighborhood
here,
so
just
by
taking
that
one
block
and
straightening
that
off
not
to
mention
I'll,
go
ahead
and
do
the
whole
thing
to
make
this
one
straight
line.
I
would
click
that
and
then
where's
my
green
there.
It
is
look
at
now
see
where
28
it
says:
negative
1.01
percent
and
then
16,
it's
negative
0.022,
so
those
are
within
plus
or
minus
the
two
percent
that
we
use
as
a
guideline
of
what
we're
trying
to
get
to
look.
D
What
happens
when
you
just
change
that
one
street
it
goes
to
plus
ten
percent
and
minus
eleven
percent,
and
that's
just
not
going
to
fly.
That's
too
much
variation
between
districts,
so
I'm
just
showing
you
how
this
process
works
on
how
something
so
small
that
may
seem
like
well.
Why
is
this
this
way?
It's
because
it
throws
the
population
off
by
too
big
of
a
percentage.
D
So
that
kind
of
explains
that
a
little
bit
so
that's
the
first
map,
that's
a
it's
really
largely
what
we
have
with
a
little
bit
of
street
cleanup
to
make
things
as
much
as
possible.
G
Mr
hunter,
mr
chairman,
thank
you
very
much
andy.
I
know
this
is
not
an
easy
task
and
I
understand
that
no
no
problems
in
terms
of
what
I've
seen
I
I
know
you
have
boundaries
marked
out.
Is
there
a
possibility?
I
know,
may
require
some
additional
research
and
writing
and
so
forth
to
actually
provide
a
narrative.
G
H
D
It
basically
goes
from
grinnell
road.
If
you
wanted
to
look
at
17
uses
maple
street
as
a
boundary
when
it
hits
17,
then
it
grabs
those
neighborhoods
because
it
you
have
to
keep
population
balance
between
the
two,
and
so
it's
we'll
say,
hillcrest
largely
what
it
is
right
now.
That's
the
basic.
G
D
When
we're
done
with
the
maps,
it's
what
spits
out
the
legal
descriptions.
So
that's
when
we're
done
and
that's
what
dan
was
here
to
to
comment
on
a
little
bit
that
and
dana.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
to
join
us,
but
one
of
the
things
dan
was
here.
I
I
showed
him
all
these
different
versions
of
the
maps
to
say:
does
this
put
up
heavily
into
your
precinct
system
or
something
that
can't
be
overcome
when
we
maybe
move
a
line
on
a
precinct
or
whatever
else
so
dan?
I
I
did
have
an
opportunity
to
look
at
these
maps
late
last
week
and
well.
I
wouldn't
say
that
I've
given
them
or
been
able
to
go
into
significant
amounts
of
detail
just
as
an
overview,
though
I
I
think
that,
regardless
of
which
map
you
choose
we'll
be
able
to
code
it
without
any
significant
issues
I
did
want
to
since
you've.
Given
me
the
floor,
and
thank
you
for
that.
I
want
to
compliment
this
committee
on
the
the
fine
work
that
you're
doing
and
is
being
as
open
and
transparent
as
possible.
I
With
this,
I
did
see
those
legislative
maps
this
weekend
and
I
think
that
what
they're
doing
there
is
the
antithesis
of
what
we're
doing
here
and
and
what
we're
doing
here
should
be
the
standard
for
everybody,
but
as
far
as
the
maps
go
to
themselves.
As
far
as
coding
goes,
it's
going
to
be
work
for
us
regardless,
but
I
think
that
there's
nothing
here
that
I
see
that
poses
such
a
significant
challenge
that
it's
going
to
be
burdensome
except
unduly
burdensome.
G
G
I
need
to
know
that
stuff
and
make
sure
that
I
don't
have
somebody
else's
who's
contiguous
to
me
so
and
I,
if
I'm
going
to
send
something
out
to
my
constituents,
I
don't
want
to
send
it
to
somebody
else
who's,
not
in
my
district.
So
I
need
to
know
what
specificity
orally
and,
as
he's
said,
he'll
they'll
code.
It
and
they'll
do
the
legal
stuff
that
cyril
just
talked
about
so
that
that's
all
I'm
concerned
about
yeah.
D
Get
rid
of
a
few
things
here,
so
we
can
start
to
discuss
it,
but
in
a
different
manner,
so
it
basically
creates
the
line
when
you
start
balancing
population.
I
just
want
to
mention
you
could
either
do
it
in
a
I
don't
say,
east
to
west
fashion
or
a
north
and
a
south
fashion,
so
this
just
represents
that
balance
in
a
north-south
fashion.
D
So
this
is
kind
of
what
you're
looking
at
here
and
also
here
I'll
click
up
the
previous
county
board
districts,
and
you
can
see
those
lines
how
it
took
gerrymander
out
of
some
of
these
areas
made
more
clean
lines.
The
red
is
where
it
was,
so
you
can
see
these
little
things
that
are
kind
of
hanging
out
here,
what
what's
going
on
there,
but
anyway,
maybe
that
was
the
limitation,
a.
A
D
You
know
so
that
that
kind
of
describes
a
little
bit
about
how
we're
addressing
some
of
that
in
in
this
version.
So
it's
a
different
way
to
accomplish
the
same
thing
you
notice
over
here.
It
moved
by
a
sense.
You
know,
basically
that
is
it
those
acres,
a
section
a
section
over
here
on
the
side
in
in
just
west
of
kankakee.
D
So
it
shows
you
a
little
bit
of
change
there
very
minimal,
though
it's
not
earth
shattering.
As
far
as
the
the
the
cleanup,
if
you
will
in
these
areas
out
here,
so
is
there
any
any
questions
about
this
one
and
we
can
dive
back
into
them,
but
I'll
kind
of
show
you
the
progression,
maybe
and
then
we'll
go
from
there.
H
D
So
again,
this
is
just
another
way
to
look
at
it
of
compacting
the
furthering
the
thing.
Oh,
let's
compact,
some
more
districts.
If
we're
going
to
change
some
things,
how
can
we
make
it
better?
Because
we
do
we
don't
have
again
new
census
numbers
and
we
won't
until
looks
like
september.
D
This
was
just
another
way
to
do
that
and
straighten
up
this
line
here,
because,
as
you
see
before,
this
area
was
heavily
kind
of,
I
don't
say,
heavily
gerrymandered,
but
there
was
there
was
boundaries
and
they
were
that
way
for
population.
Well,
this
is
just
a
different
way
to
balance
the
population
in
these
areas
as
well.
D
So,
let's
see
here,
let's
zoom
back
out
to
the
to
the
whole
county.
Sorry
about
that
a
little
blank
on
you
there,
so
nothing
else
really
has
changed
beyond
straightening
up
the
the
cities.
If
you
will
a
little
bit
mostly
k
key
bradley
and
birmingham,
so
is
there
any
questions
about
that
before
we
go
further
and
then
go
to
the
next
one,
then
we
can
circle
back.
Maybe
it's
just
right
through
collins,
collins.
Yes,
yes,.
C
Oh
yeah,
so
on
b
I
notice
there
the
redistricting
13
is
my
district
there.
The
b
map
would
leave
me
no
longer
living
in
my
district.
A
D
D
All
right,
so
we
go
to
d,
I
believe
d
correct.
So
this
one
is
very
similar,
and
that
was
a
the
other
changes.
I
there
was
another
way
to
approach
15,
which
was
to
grab
more
population
along.
The
I
want
to
say
was
that
water
street
right
here,
dairy
queen,
is
that
water
street
right
there,
okay,
the
west
side
of
kangen
key
through
as
the
old
13-15.
D
D
Momentum
was
divided
amongst
three
board
members.
It
was
for
population
reasons,
was
you
know,
so
we
said
well
what,
if
that
area
was
its
own
district,
the
moments
area,
just
as
a
what?
If
and
so
this
was
drawn
as
an
answer
to
that
with
largely
keeping
things
the
same,
and
then
you
have
to
take
a
look
at
this
district
five.
Where
does
the
population
come
from
in
order
to
have
that
balance?
D
Because
if
you
were
to
take
part
of
moments
out,
it
has
to
come
from
somewhere
else,
and
so
what
it
does
is
it
turns
five
into
what
it
really
is
is
a
largely
rural
area,
and
it
stays
more
consistent
with
that
and
puts
two
basically
shooting
from
state
line
all
the
way
to
right
outside
of
moments.
So
it's
it's
say
a
little
up
as
little
upheaval
as
possible
with
trying
to
get
that
moments
area
as
one
area
it
also.
D
We
always
have
to
keep
in
mind
that
the
sun
river
terrace
hopkins
park
connection
cannot
be
separated,
because
that
will,
I
think,
rightfully
be
challenged
that
that's.
D
We
you
have
to
choose
anchors
in
this
process.
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
knows
that,
because
if,
if
you
start
moving
something
over
here,
it
has
an
impact
over
on
the
other
side
of
the
county,
because
everything
starts
sliding
one
direction
or
you
start
moving
things
inside
the
cities
and
then
they
push
out
into
the
other
areas.
So
you
have
to
kind
of
keep
in
mind
that
every
action
has
a
equal
reaction
somewhere
else
and.
F
And
and
andy
I
know
you've
said:
hey,
I'm
going
to
get
to
my
counselor
andy.
I
know
you've
talked
before
about
the
uniqueness
of
the
county
in
that
you
have
a
rural
majority
minority
community.
So
and
that's
probably
the
anchor
I
would
say,
because
if
you
separate
that
you're
right,
you
are,
you
are
running
a
foul.
D
D
F
And
that's
what
the
resident
of
the
sun
river
terrorists,
former
mayor,
shirley
bird,
come
to
talk
about
right,
that
if
you
were
to
separate
really
the
pembroke
pembroke
is
its
own
district
and
sun
river
is
its
own
district.
If
you
start
to
separate
those,
you
will
really
dilute
the
voting
power
there.
So.
D
G
Yeah,
I
was
just
making
a
comment
on
affirming
what
those
gentlemen
were
saying,
because
I
know
at
one
point,
as
our
counselor
indicated
shirley
bird
was
very
concerned
that
sun
river
terrace
had
been
placed
in
with
saint
anne.
So
that's
the
example
those
guys
gave.
So
I'm
just
concurring
with
that.
Thank
you.
D
D
It
was
a
different
look
at
the
moments
area
so
going
between
basically
two
board
reps-
and
I
forgot
mr
payton-
had
a
little
bit
of
momentum,
one
time
as
well
correct
the
bottom
part.
So
it
was
really
four
at
one
point
that
had
a
piece
of
that.
So
if
we
we
got
that
down
to
basically
two.
What
does
that
look
like
with
everything
else
on
the
map
being
largely
the
same,
so
you
start
looking
at
this
is
the
layout
here
for
the
city
and
and
not
much
else
changes.
D
D
So
if
you
want
to
see
that
make
that
mention-
and
we
can
do
that
as
well
and
bring
that
back,
but
these
are
things
and
if
they're
viable,
we
should
be
able
to
get
to
that.
To
that.
You
know
plus
or
minus
two
percent,
that's
really
kind
of
where
I'm
at,
and
I
think
that's
because
that's
where
we
started
with.
D
Yeah
yeah
definitely-
and
I
could
probably
get
it
done
if
there's
more
changes
on
friday
for
monday,
as
well
so
tuesday
or
for.
A
For
general,
reference
go
back
and
highlight
that
area
by
moments.
Again,
if
you
see
that's
the
break
along
there,
that's
the
river
right
here,
that's
what
they're
using
right
right!
It's
not
a
straight
line,
but
that's
the
river!
That's
the
boundary
line
that
correct!
That's
a
good
boundary
yeah,
okay,.
D
And
again
you
could
jump
it
just
to
get
population.
That's
really
the
only
reason
you
would
ever
want
to
jump
a
natural
boundary
like
boundary
like
that,
and
it's
still
not
the
best
idea,
as
evidenced
over
here
like
with
you,
know,
28
and
nine.
That's
just
a
river
separating
throughout
this
area
it
and
it
makes
it
it
makes
it.
I
want
to
say,
look
gerrymandered.
If
you
will
that's
just
the
layout
of
the
county
we
live
in.
You
know,
we've
got
some
idiosyncrasies,
a
couple
of
rivers
coming
together.
D
You
know
it's
you
know,
then
they,
like
a
majority
minority,
rural
district,
that
you
just
don't
see
a
whole
lot
of
time.
So
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
for
consideration.
Oh
I'm.
D
We
actually
had
someone
from
the
public
submit
a
map.
It
came
in
towards
the
end
of
the
day
on
friday,
so
we
decided
we
got
time
to
put
it
in
here
and
it's
from
a
gentleman
by
the
name
of
chia
chico
gary
chiacchico,
oh
okay,
gary
siacio,
and
he
suggested
very
specifically
instructions.
D
This
map
here
and
it
changed
district
10
to
be
plus
16
district
14
went
to
minus
15.
District
13
went
to
plus
17
and
19
went
to
minus
24.
So.
G
D
All
those
instructions
were
on
the
website
with
what
needed
to
happen
as
far
as
our
mandates.
So
I
would
say
that
this
is
not
a
viable
map
in
my
opinion,
but
that's
for
this
committee
to
decide
and.
A
F
When
you
start
to
hit,
you
know,
29
deviation
in
one
district
you're
starting
to
really
dilute
the
voting
weight
of
the
individuals
in
that
district,
and
the
idea
of
you
know
one
person,
one
vote,
so
you've
got
minus
27,
plus
29.
Those
are
significant
deviations
of
population
by
district.
F
You
know
worst
case
scenario,
you
maybe
you
would
be
around
10
and
it
would
require
significant
justification
to
be
there,
maybe
like
a
significant
boundary,
perhaps
or
some
reason
that
you
couldn't
possibly
deviate,
such
as
the
the
anchor
district
the
chairman
wheeler
talked
about,
but
in
this
case
with
those
numbers,
I
can't
see
that
passing
any
type
of
court
scrutiny.
J
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
was
wondering
if
we
could
go
back
to
e
and
if
we
could
zoom
in
between
five
and
two
to
see
which
of
the
districts
there
would
cover
the
whitaker
sumner
area.
It
would
be
on
like
whitaker
road
towards
diversity,.
K
D
D
So
I'll
close
this
one
out,
does
anyone
want
to
take
a
look
or
comment
on
any
of
these?
The
question
mr
featherweight.
E
D
E
D
D
D
We
can't
go
south
in
the
moments
area
with
this
district
because
that
would
obviously
infringe
on
one
of
the
anchors,
but
so
you
have
to
go
straight
up
or
you
can
come
straight
across,
but
then
you
then
you've
limited
here
and
then
that
has
to
shoot
across
the
river.
So
I
mean
it's
like
I
said
you
change
one
thing
here
and
it
pushes
out
all
the
way
across
the
country.
D
A
D
A
A
K
G
K
K
G
Could
you
could
you
put
that
in
proper
syntax
counselor,
in
terms
of
which
you
articulated
regarding
f.
G
A
G
Now,
council,
will
you
prepare
a
communication
to
the
author
of
this
map
justifying
why
the
action
was
taken
or
not.
F
The
board
asks
me
for
a
memo.
You
know
the
chairman
asks
for
a
memo
as
to
the
viability
of
that
map,
we'll
provide
it,
but
we
don't
communicate
with.
I.
G
E
Mr
featherweight,
mr
rowe,
it
wouldn't
that
be
in
our
minutes
on
the
on
the
meeting
on
youtube
or
wherever
it's
highlighted
at.
F
Yeah
look:
look.
The
the
state's
attorney's
office
doesn't
tell
you
whether
to
approve
a
map
not
to
approve
a
map,
but
when
you
ask
for
a
legal
right
opinion
as
to
whether
a
map
is
viable
to
the
extent
a
court
would
look
at
it
and
say
that's
a
fair
map.
My
analysis
of
that
map
would
be
that
it's
not
viable
because
of
that
significant
deviation
in
population.
That's
what
we're
doing
so.
That's
the
basis
for
my
opinion,
so
to
say
the
board
now
decides.
F
The
board
could
still
go
forward
and
pass
that
map
and
we
would
have
to
likely
defend
it
in
court
and
probably
not
successfully.
But
you
know
we
don't
tell
you
what
to
do,
how
to
vote.
Whether
to
you
know,
yeah
kick
a
map
or
include
a
map.
We
just
provide
you
with
our
our
best
legal
opinion
and,
in
my
opinion,
that
map
would
not
be
looked
upon
favorably
by
a
court.
C
D
D
Got
about
four
different
concepts,
and
you
can
you
know
they
can
come
back
friday
or
monday
and
say
we
hopefully
friday
and
say
start
combining
these
aspects
of
these
two
maps,
or
this
is
the
one
we
like,
or
let's
take
these
two
forward
to
monday
and
think
about
it
over
the
weekend.
It's
really
your
call.
You
know,
okay,.
G
D
D
G
D
They're
all
viable,
I
think,
they're
all
legal.
I
think
they
all
are
adhere
to
the
voting
rights
act
from
that,
and
I
think
that
they
have
varying
improvements
and
compactness
and
that's
s
stepped
from
a
to
b
to
c
to
d.
So
that's
as
you
get
you
get
the
districts
get
more
compact.
As
you
go
up
the
chain
there.
G
What
I'm
essentially
saying
I
I
wanted
you
to
rank
those
in
terms
of
the
minimum
amount
of
of
deviation.
F
So
I
mean
you
guys
asking
too
much
yeah
I
mean
you
can
look
on
here
when
you've
been
the
highest.
The
highest
deviation
is
two
percent,
which
is
on
map
d
and
that's
literally,
a
difference
of,
I
think,
one
vote
which,
because
79
votes
in
that
district
four
is
1.9
percent
on
maps
a
and
b
and
c,
and
then
in
d.
F
It
goes
to
80
80
vote
deviation,
which
jumps
to
two
percent.
Okay,
so
the
highest
deviation
you
have.
There
is
two
percent
across
any
of
these
maps.
Yeah.
H
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I'm
not
a
voter
member
of
this
committee,
but
as
a
member
of
the
county
board,
I
think
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
detail
here.
I
would
urge
this
committee
to
take
a
little
bit
of
time,
allow
them
to
look
at
these
more
closely
before
they
try
to
make
any
further
decisions,
because
it
appears
that
there's
just
so
much
to
take
on
at
this
point
that
it
may
be
too
early
to
to
do
something
today
in
terms
of
eliminating
any
one
of
these
other
four
maps
or
five
five
maps.
Yeah.
E
Mr
fatherling,
mr
chairman,
and
thank
you
I
I'm
gonna
have
to
we
gotta
start
a
conversation
here
somewhere.
E
I
I
kind
of
like
e
kind
of
kind
of
looks
like
it
was
somebody
really
put
their
head
into
it
when
they
made
it,
it's
not
all
chopped
up,
it
seems
smooth,
and
the
lines
are
very,
I
don't
know
what's
the
word
to
use
copacetic
is
that
the
word
to
use
it
doesn't
look
all
chopped
up
and,
like
you,
took
three
boxes
and
drew
them
to
the
east
and
two
boxes
and
drew
them
to
the
west
and
then
filled
the
rest
of
it
in
it
looks
like
the
boundaries
are
good.
E
The
lines
are
good,
the
main
drags,
the
main
highways
that
I
don't
know
just
seems
like
it
seems
very
nice
and
laid
out
and
solid
to
me.
I
don't
know
how
anyone
can
argue
with
the
percentage
variations
in
it.
How
many?
How
much
closer?
Can
you
get
than
what
you
already
have
I
mean
if
two
people
move
in
then
it
changes
the
whole.
You
know
it
changes
the
percentages,
so
I
just
think
that
I,
I
really
think
that
he's
really
smooth.
Looking
looks
good,
I
don't
know,
but
that's
not
probably
what
we're
supposed
to
do.
E
A
G
Yeah
I
overlooked
this
and
I
I
think
that
council
spoke
to
this
and
that
really
helped
you
out.
If
you
take
a
look
at
the
empirical
data
that
you
that
you
got
here.
A
Okay,
at
the
start
of
the
meeting
I
said
our
goal
would
be
to
eliminate
maps.
So
when
we
come
back
on
the
weekend
so
far
we
eliminated
one
map
and
if
that's
what
the
pleasure
is
of
the
committee,
we
could
come
back
friday.
It
would,
as
mr
lear
said,
I'll
give
you
time.
These
are
all
online
numbers
wise.
Oh.
D
All
these
maps-
I
don't
yeah-
we
put
these
online,
no,
no,
we're
gonna,
wait
until
after
this
meeting
after
the
meeting
after
the
meeting
we'll
put
these
online
we're
leaving
these
in
the
boardroom
for
all
committees
and
everybody
on
the
board
that
come
in
here
to
look
at
so
they'll
be
up
today.
Okay,
and
these
this
data
up
there
on
the
compactness.
A
E
My
question
was
is
coming
back
if
we
need
more
time
to
disperse
this,
look
at
it
read
it
look
at
it.
I
mean
it's
on
friday's
on
friday's.
Only
a
few
days
away,
and
we
all
have
two
meetings
in
between
most
of
us
have
been
ready
to
look
at
everything
by
friday
would
be
kind
of
tough
to
do.
But
I
know
you
want
to
eliminate
maps
so
correct.
We
got
tuesday,
we
got
executive
finance,
wednesday,
all
kinds
of
other
things
going
on
and
all
those
other
committees
also
this
week.
A
D
The
goal
is,
is
that
it
would
be
nice
that
we're
not
in
here
meeting
on
june
7th,
which
is
the
day
before
the
full
county
board
meeting
without
having
this
done.
So
the
ultimate
goal
would
hopefully
to
be
to
wind
up
on
june
4th
I
would
suggest
getting
through
friday
and
maybe
having
a
couple
of
choices
to
think
about
over
the
weekend
and
then
come
in
here
monday
and
vote
on
the
one
that
you
want
and
it
could
or
tuesday
at
least
I'm
consistent,
but
the
the
the
other
thing
could
be.
D
A
F
I
can
just
speak.
I
know
this
is
something
we
went
over.
I
think
in
the
very
beginning,
one
thing
that
you
may
want
to
avoid
is
going
to
your
final
board
meeting
for
approval
with
just
one
map.
I
understand
it's
gone
through
committee,
but
when
that
one
map
goes
to
the
board,
then
that's
the
only
option
on
the
table
and
you're
running
up
against
a
timeline.
That's
when
courts
have
pushed
back,
and
there
was.
There
was
one
case
specifically
on
that
where
the
court
said
they
were
up
against
the
deadline.
F
F
G
Mr
hunter
yeah
and,
what's
really
interesting,
is
the
chairman
just
indicated
these
things
will
be
posted
in
here.
Okay,
these
maps
and
the
data
that
information
is
going
to
be
posted.
You
know
for
the
stakeholders,
the
constituents
to
take
a
look
at
and
and
hopefully
we'll
get
feedback.
You
know
from
them
too,
and
that
may
help
us
in
our
deliberation
regarding
options
that
we
may
pursue.
C
Collins,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Would
it
be
beneficial
to
us,
as
a
committee,
to
maybe
take
a
ranked
voting
or
aim
for
that
for
this
friday,
where
we
can
all
list
the
maps
and
the
priority
in
which
we
like
them
and
then
compare
those
against
each
other
and
try
and
get
a
sort
of
just
a
ranked
voting
system
for
this
to
kind
of
go
forward
and
eliminate
more
maps.
G
C
I'll
go
forward
with
the
idea
of
putting
our
maps
in
order
of
how
we
like
them,
vote
on
that
this
friday
and
we're
not
necessarily
not
present
them
to
each
other
in
our
ring
order
and
see
where
that
puts
the
maps
in
order.
As
a
as
a
group.
D
I
just
wonder
how
that
helps,
and
I'm
not
saying
it
to
have
that
own
process
done
internally
within
yourself
is
a
good
idea.
This
is
the
order
of
the
way
I
like
the
maps
and
maybe
kind
of
elucidate.
Why
that
you
like
it
or
don't
like
it?
What
needs
to
change
in
order
for
you
to
like
it
more?
D
But
if
we
come
in
here
with
right
maps,
we
could
end
up
with
four
ties
and
I
think
that
becomes
a
bigger
problem
than
anything
else.
I
think
the
goal
should
be
to
really
come
in
and
be
willing
to
say
on
the
record,
what
you
like
about
this
map-
and
you
have
a
second
one
or
a
third
one
internally,
but
to
put
that
down
in
some
type
of
a
rubric.
We
could
bind
ourselves
and
not
be
able
to
move
forward
because
we
have
three
or
four
with
the
same
number.
D
You've
got
it
first,
you've
got
the
same.
One
second
you've
got
a
third
and
then
the
opposite
direction.
Guess
what
it's
two
to
two
on
everything,
so
it
doesn't
work,
but
I
think
that
please,
I
think
it's
a
strong
suggestion
to
to
go
through
and
rank
them,
how
you
think
they
are
and
what's
what's
right
about
them
and
what's
wrong
with
them.
D
Yes,
because
we
won't
bring
five
maps
to
the
board
because
it'll
be
a
four-hour
beating,
yeah
and
and
we
we
are
already
breaking
ground
on
the
most
open
and
transparent
process.
I
think
the
comedy's
ever
seen
and
with
five
four
I
mean
it
and
two
sure,
okay,
we
can
have
two,
but
for
three:
it's
just
gonna
be
a
nightmare.
D
F
F
I
would
just
say
the
the
more
options
you
can
bring
to
that.
I
understand
it's
going
to
be
a
long
meeting,
but
I
I
just
think
the
more
options
you
you
can.
Ultimately,
the
committee
can
bring
to
the
board
the
better
just
for
discussion,
because
someone
may
really,
you
could
have
a
majority
of
people
on
the
county
board
who
want
d
and
you
bring
a
through
c
you've
kind
of
eliminated,
a
map
that
the
majority
would
have
selected.
That's
viable.
D
Oh,
they
could
have
any
commit
yeah.
I
I
agreed
on
their
own
map
and
you
know,
frankly,
can
still
come
to
these
meetings
and
contribute.
You
know,
but
and
and
because
we
do
have
other
board
members
who
aren't
on
this
committee,
that
don't
vote
and
their
voice
is
just
as
important
as
the
rest
of
us
yeah.
F
E
E
When
I
come
to
the
county
board
meeting,
I
know
those
people.
I
know
that
they've
gone
through
that
and
they've
gone
over
it
and
they've
looked
at
the
details
and
they've
looked
at
all
the
information
and
they've
done
all
the
things
that
they
need
to
do
homework
wise
to
come
to
that
meeting
and
and
know
what
to
do
and
then,
when
it
comes
to
county
board.
I
understand
it.
E
E
So
when
something
comes
out
of
this
committee,
they're
going
to
know
that
it
was
looked
at
and
it
was
run
through,
you
see
all
the
maps
and
all
the
work
that
was
done
and
all
the
charts
and
the
graphs
and
everything
that
we
have
it's
like.
How
can
you
contest
anything?
That's
been
done
so
far.
I
mean
I
don't.
I
don't
know
how
you
could,
but.
E
E
But
yeah
I'm,
I
agree
with
mr
wheeler
here
that
you
know
one
or
two
sure
close
together,
not
a
lot
of
different
sure
but
everybody's
going
to
come
in
and
want
to.
You
know,
square
up
their
own
area
have
this
area
in
their
district
and
then
they're
all
going
to
stand
around
for
four
hours
and
argue
about
it.
E
That's
28
people,
yeah
and-
and
we're
supposed
to
do
that
here-
that's
what
I
thought
I
was
here
for
so
I
I
was
under
that
information,
so
I
would
hope
they
would
trust
our
opinion
to
come
up
with
the
best
two
viable
maps
out
of
all
this
information.
But
that's
up
to
them.
They
can
contact
us
too,
or
you
know
we
all
got
email
so
yeah.
E
Yeah,
no,
that's
what
I
mean.
I
mean
you're
going
to
ask
the
guy
you
like
that
map.
It's
like!
No,
because
mine
should
be
over
here
and
watch
me
down
here.
The
railroad
tracks
are
there,
you
know.
Maybe
it
looks
better
that
way.
Well,
it's
easy
to
walk
in
and
go.
I
don't
like
it
when
everybody
else
has
done
all
the
homework.
F
G
G
Without
being
redundant
guys-
and
I
mean
that
collectively
you
you
take
a
look
at
the
last
two
columns-
not
the
deviation
and
the
percentage
deviation,
don't
look
at
the
the
deviation
per
se,
but
you
take
a
look
at
the
percentage
deviation
unless
somebody
can
come
up
with
a
map,
that's
tighter
than
that
in
terms
of
the
percentage.
G
You
know,
it's
not
that
it's
going
to
take
an
act
of
congress,
but
this
is
pretty
tight
in
terms
of
the
percentage
deviation,
and
I
think
that's
what
what
the
chairman
has
done
in
terms
of
his
deliberation
and
we've
seen
this
empirically
maps,
one
a
through
f
f
was
off
the
charts,
as
as
we
all
know,
based
on
the
comments
on
the
empirical
evidence
that
they've
depicted
in
in
mr
siacio's
map,
but
the
other
maps.
G
You
know
you
take
a
look
at
the
deviation
percentage.
Deviation,
it's
pretty
tight,
they're,
pretty
tight,
there's,
not
a
whole
bunch
of
a
difference.
So
unless
somebody
can,
you
know
from
the
public
or
the
28
members,
one
of
the
persons
can
come
up
with
something
tighter
than
this.