►
From YouTube: Senate Standing Committee on Education (3-9-23)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
A
A
We
just
want
to
make.
You
feel,
welcome
and
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
all
the
good
work
that
sreb
does.
A
lot
of
great
ideas.
Statutes
that
passed
out
of
this
chamber
are
because
of
the
hard
work
of
sreb,
specifically
Senate
Bill
9
last
year,
I
see
co-chair
Tipton
is
here
without
sreb.
That
would
not
be
reality.
So,
thanks
for
coming.
D
E
F
Yes,
I
have
Teresa
messenger
from
Gallatin
County
school
she's,
a
librarian
there
we're
trying
to
convince
her
to
stay
at
least
another
three
years
before
she
retires.
Thank
you
for
being
here.
Welcome.
A
G
Robin
Webb
district
18,
which
includes
Lewis
County
now,
and
we
have
shared
that
during
our
tenure
Mr
chairman
I,
appreciate
the
attention
to
this
matter.
Back
in
1881,
the
Vanceburg
school
system
made
their
foray
into
public
education
and
converted
the
vansburg
male
and
female
Academy
to
Vanceburg
public
school
and
Seminary,
and
in
so
doing,
The
Specialist
of
special
legislation
was
passed
by
the
legislature
regarding
that
property
transfer,
with
restrictions
that
are
statutory
in
nature
and
since
that
time
the
property
has
not
been
utilized.
G
It's
come
under
quite
the
hazard
with
squatters
and
infestations,
and
things
and
and
the
system
has
to
carry
liability
insurance
on
that.
Thank
you
that,
and
so
we
need
to
do
this
act
to
allow
them
to
transfer
the
property
for
economic
development
and
get
it
off
the
school
system
roles.
G
A
I've,
just
quick
comment
at
first
I
was
questioning
your
bill
because
I
mean
this
is
this
is
special
legislation,
but
all
it
is
is
special
legislation
that
addresses
special
legislation,
that's
already
in
statutes,
so.
A
A
A
Thank
you.
Next
up
we
have
a
couple
of
resolutions:
Senate
resolution
114
and
Senate
resolution
115.
Senator
Wilson.
Do
you
want
to
step
down
or
you
want
to
speak
from
the
MR.
H
Chairman,
if
I
could
just
speak
from
here,
I
think
these
are
pretty
easy
resolutions.
These
are
for
the
Western
Kentucky
University
Board
of
Regents.
Both
of
these
folks
are
currently
on
the
board
and
I
know
them
both
very,
very
well.
H
Gary
Brody
is
the
executive
director
of
the
Bluegrass
Community
Bankers.
It's
been
in
the
community
for
a
long
time
and
in
our
tent
County
region.
I
call
it,
but
he
is
just
a
impeccable
character
and
a
very
valuable
asset
to
the
university
itself,
and
so
I
would
just
move
for
adoption
of
that
resolution.
A
A
We
have
a
second
we're
going
to
do
a
Voice
vote
with
these
resolutions.
All
those
in
favor
of
Senate
resolution
114,
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
posts,
nay
eyes,
have
it
resolution
114
is
adopted.
Senator
Wilson.
Would
you
prefer
both
of
these
Beyond
consent?
Yes,
sir?
So
we
have
a
motion
for
114
to
be
on
consent.
A
H
You
Mr
chairman,
this
is
Melissa
Dennison,
who
is
a
pediatrician
and
has
served
on
the
board
previously
and
was
off
and
now
is
back
on
the
board
again
and
she
did
a
stellar
job
when
she
was
there
and
so
I
would
just
move
for
adoption
of
this
resolution
as
well
with
her
I
know
her
very
well
she's
impeccable
character.
Thank.
A
I
Want
to
follow
up
with
Senator
Wilson
I've
known
Melissa
Dennison
for
a
very
long
time,
she's
a
practicing
physician
as
Senator
Wilson,
said
also
practiced
in
Greene
County
in
Greensburg
for
a
number
of
years.
She
has
an
impeccable
record
as
a
pediatrician
I
fully
support
the
nomination.
Thank
you
thank.
A
H
A
Eyes
have
it
Senate
resolution
115
is
adopted
to
a
motion
for
consent
on
Senate
resolution.
115.
Central
wise
is
the
motion.
Senator
Frankie
frommeyer
is
the
second
all
those
in
favor
of
Senate
resolution,
115
being
on
consent,
say
aye
aye,
as
opposed
nay
I
always
have
it
Senate
resolution
115
is
on
consent.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Senator
Wilson.
A
J
Proceed:
Mr
chairman
senators
of
the
committee,
House
Bill
32
in
a
nutshell,
will
give
school
systems
the
opportunity
to
hire
classified
personnel
that
do
not
currently
have
a
high
school
diploma
or
GED.
If
the
employee
chooses
to
pursue
their
GED,
the
school
system
will
provide
that
opportunity
who
are
classified
personnel.
J
They
are
Key
School
support
staff
such
as
cafeteria
workers,
custodians
bus
drivers,
classroom
aides,
Etc.
This
bill
only
impacts
classified
staff.
Why
do
we
need
this
bill?
I
spent
the
past
five
years
on
the
Warren
County
Board
of
Education,
and
last
week,
I
called
our
HR
director.
Currently
Warren
County
public
schools
has
100
classified
openings.
J
J
L
K
Yeah
sure
Senator
Daniel
great
question,
really
what
we're
referencing
is
that
there
are
folks
that
we
could
employ
in
these
very
critical
positions
that
do
not
have
a
high
school
diploma
or
a
GED
and
right
now
they
would
have
to
have
that
or
or
show
progress
toward
pursuing
that
the
bill
does
provide
that
they
can
get
that
free
of
charge,
but
doesn't
require
them
to
do
so,
and
so
this
is
something
that
happens
in
very
rare
occasions,
but
it's
something
where,
for
instance,
if
we
have
someone
who
has
a
CDL,
they
think
they
can
drive
a
bus.
K
We
don't
need
them
to
have
a
high
school
diploma,
necessarily
and
so
we're
talking
about
a
barrier
to
employment,
as
in
folks
who
do
not
have
those
credentials
but
have
the
right
credentials
for
the
job
at
hand.
K
C
L
K
H
Thank
you
Mr
chairman
and
representative
Jackson
who's
from
my
district.
By
the
way,
I'm
sure
you
have
a
little
experience
in
these
areas
because
you
were
an
educator
coach.
You
might
have
done
some
of
the
things
that
some
of
those
folks
do
like
most
and
practice
fields
and
football
fields
and
different
things
like
that.
So
I
was
just
curious.
What
kind
of
you
know
fertilizer
you
used
on
your
Lawns.
A
H
C
Leaned
over
and
he
said
you
got
to
think
of
a
question
to
ask
him
and
I'm
scrambling
here,
trying
to
think
of
a
question.
It's
great
to
have
you
here
and
thanks
for
your
leadership
and
excited
to
be
serving
alongside
you.
C
C
C
D
Thank
you,
Mr,
chairman
representative
Jackson.
Thank
you
for
yeah.
I
can
remember
over
the
years
as
businesses
required
a
GED
or
high
school
diploma
for
employment.
The
general
assembly
put
these
type
restrictions
in
the
in
the
bills.
So
I
guess
it's
a
sign
of
the
times
that
we're
going
back,
taking
a
step
backwards
and
and
not
requiring
that
it's
I
wish
we
weren't
doing
so,
but
I
understand
the
issue,
so
I
guess
I
needed
to
say
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
You
Senator,
Higdon
and
I
use
my
dad
as
an
example.
My
dad
was
a
dropped
out
of
school
at
16
and
became
a
master
Carpenter
built
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
custom
homes
in
South
Central
Kentucky.
He
could
have
not
gotten
a
job
with
Warren
County,
School
Board,
even
working
in
the
maintenance
department,
because
he
didn't
have
a
high
school
diploma
or
a
GED
and
I
think
that
would
have
been
a
waste.
Somebody
with
his
skills
couldn't
even
have
gotten
a
job
so
that
it's
personal
to
me
in
a
way
and
I
want
to
help.
J
Warren
County
schools
and
all
other
schools
across
the
state
be
able
to
feel
some
of
those
classified
positions
that
we
so
dearly
need.
A
A
A
M
You're
ready
James,
District,
James,
Tipton
house,
District,
53
and
Mr
chair
members
committee.
It's
a
pleasure
to
be
here
with
you
today.
You
know
this
is
one
of
those
pieces
of
legislation
that
I
wish.
We
didn't
have
to
talk
about.
I
wish
we
didn't
have
to
address,
but
we
have
a
reality
out
there.
M
Now
Mr
chairman
I
do
know
there
is
a
senate
committee,
sub
I
appreciate
you
for
adding
this
language
and
I'll
briefly,
explain
that
and
on
page
six
of
the
bill
lines,
19
and
20.,
it
just
states
that
the
requirements
of
this
subsection
shall
apply
to
all
non-faculty
coach
or
non-faculty
assistant
coach
in
the
district,
where
they're
paid
or
unpaid
I
want
to
thank
representative
timony
for
suggesting
this
language
is
to
cover
that
area.
It
makes
your
recovered.
So
if
you
need
to
address
this
up
I'll,
let
you
do
that
is.
A
M
Okay,
Mr
chair
back
back
to
the
bill,
I'll
just
briefly
go
through
the
main
components
of
it
there
at
the
beginning,
you'll
see
one.
The
main
components
is
that
a
school
district
would
not
be
allowed
to
enter
into
a
non-disclosure
agreement
with
with
a
teacher,
an
individual
regarding
this
type
of
misconduct
in
the
application
process.
M
One
of
the
questions
on
the
application
when
a
certified
person
or
or
individual
applies
for
position
to
school
have
has
there
been
an
allegation
or
an
investigation
of
this
type
in
the
last
12
months.
It
would
also
require
the
school
district
to
check
all
the
references
from
any
previous
School
District
that
individual
had
worked
in.
It
would
require
those
school
districts
to
supply
that
information,
and
it
also
provides
immunity
language
for
those
school
districts
for
applying
that
information.
M
There
is
also
language
in
the
bill
that
states
that,
when
an
allegation
is
made
when
an
investigation
is
started,
that
investigation
has
to
be
completed.
One
of
the
things
that
I
have
learned
is
oftentimes.
An
allegation
is
made.
The
situation
arises
that
teacher
just
resigns
from
the
school,
the
school
district.
M
Well,
that
teacher's
gone
we'll
just
let
we'll
just
end
this
right
now,
however,
because
of
that
when
and
that's
actually
what
happened
with
my
my
cousin's
daughter
as
a
teacher
had
that
happen,
they
resigned,
they
went
to
a
different
School
District,
as
school
district
had
no
knowledge
no
way
of
knowing
that
situation
had
Arisen
in
the
past,
and
it
happened
again,
and
so
this
would
require
that
investigations
are
complete.
M
What
other
important
component
in
the
legislation
is,
the
results
of
all
investigations
would
be
kept
in
the
permanent
record
of
the
teacher
now
I've
had
some
people
ask
me
the
question:
what
about
if
they're,
exonerated
and
I
understand
their
concerns?
We
live
in
a
world
today,
where
there's
a
lot
of
information
out
there
and
I
could
see
a
situation
where
a
new
teacher
comes
in
the
area.
Somebody
might
Google
that
individual
and
they
might
see
something.
That
said
there
was
an
allegation
made
and
that
might
cause
an
uproar.
M
However,
if
it's
in
the
record,
that
teacher
was
exonerated,
there
is
a
record
there
and
that's
the
reason
I
wanted
to
include
it
there
in
that
it
also
right
now,
when
individuals
are
hard,
they're
required
to
have
a
background
check.
This
legislation
will
require
an
additional
background
check
every
five
years.
M
D
Questions,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
guess
my
first
comments
on
the
first
page
about
the
non-disclosure
agreements
that
they're
not
they're,
not
they're,
not
private.
You
know
that
they'll
be
revealed,
I,
think
there's
nothing
worse
than
you
have
a
non-disclosure
agreement
and
nobody
really
knows
what
what
happened.
D
The
other
thing
is
a
question
on
is
page
10
about
the
reporting
that
all
complaints,
whether
it
be
was
it
say
in
writing
early
or
electronically-
and
you
know
we
have
this
issue
in
the
child
abuse
cases
about
anonymous
tips
and,
and
that
sort
of
thing
well,
Anonymous
complaints
be
considered
or
does
it
does
the
complaint
the
person
filing
the
complaint?
Do
they
have
to
sign
that?
You
know
that
so
the
the
teacher
will
know
who's
accusing
him
or
her
of
whatever
what
the
what
the
issue
is.
M
Sandra
Higgin
I,
don't
believe
the
legislation
specifically
addresses
the
issue
of
anonymous.
What
it.
What
it
does
say
it
say
is
that
when
an
allegation
of
abusive
conduct
is
made
against
a
school
district
to
employ
the
school
district,
employee
receiving
the
allegation
or
the
communicated
in
writing
electronically
or
orally
shall
report
the
allegation
now
I
would
and
I
already
never
sin.
D
And
and
I
just
see
that
to
be
important,
and
especially
at
some
of
the
meetings
you
and
I
have
been
in
about
Anonymous
compliance.
Sure
also
who
pays
for
the
background
check.
The
fifth.
N
Carol,
thank
you
Mr
chairman,
representing
Tipton,
on
on
page
five,
and
when
you
well
I
guess
it
would
necessarily
be
that
section,
but
in
in
relation
to
reporting,
there's
no
mention
of
the
requirements
on
chapter
620
for
reporting
to
dcbs
or
law
enforcement.
N
Does
there
need
to
be
language
in
this
bill
to
ensure
that
those
procedures
are
properly
followed,
because
this,
you
know
these
reporting
requirements
would
not
alleviate
any
Administration
within
the
school
district,
from
reporting
to
dcbs
on
any
abuse
neglect
which
which
the
way
I
take
it
would
would
absolutely
fall
under
these
types
of
Investigations.
N
An
obligation
yes
to
report
I
just
didn't
know
if,
if,
if
we
needed
to
add
some.
M
Reference
there
was
no
intent
in
here
to
alleviate
a
school
district
of
that
obligation
that
these
this
language
is
more
intended
to
the
internal
School
District
policy
in
relation
to
that
District
into
epsb
how
they
handle
those
cases.
Some.
N
M
M
O
Thank
you,
representative
Tipton,
for
bringing
this
to
us.
One
I
I
struggle
between
statutes
versus
regulations
and
I'll
be
talking
to
you
about
that
with
student
transfers,
but
we're
taking
one
step
further.
What
Senator
Carroll
was
acknowledging
the
process
of
self-reporting
if
a
person
knows
that
they
had
a
DUI
over
the
weekend
and
or
they
were
caught
up
in
some
criminal
Behavior
outside
of
school,
is
there
a
requirement
that
they
must
immediately
report
it
to
their
leadership?
Even
though
it's
under
investigation,
perhaps
they
haven't
been
found
guilty?
O
I
am
a
certified
financial,
planner
and
I'm
required
to
report.
If
there's
been
anything,
there's
some
pretty
good
language
in
the
board,
so
is
it
already
addressed
in
regulations,
or
is
that
a
statutory
issue
that
maybe
we
have
to
have
it
spelled
out
more
clearly
Senator.
M
M
M
A
I'd
like
to
jump
in
and
just
make
a
quick
comment
just
for
clarification,
representative
Tipton,
so
your
your
bill
is
simply
related
to
abusive
conduct.
So
we're
not
talking
DUIs
we're
not
talking
it's.
It's
specifically
related
to
abusive
conduct,
and
it's
it's
defined
here
is
that
is
that
correct?
Yes,.
M
If
you
look
at
page
one
in
the
first
section,
there
are
on
page
actually
section
two,
you
know
we're
talking
about
inappropriate
sexual
misconduct.
It
also
defines
abusive
conduct.
We
added
that
language
I
know
that
would
also
include
abusive
conduct
involving
a
minor
or
student,
including
sexual
misconduct
and
conduct,
subject
to
mandatory
reporting
under
KRS
620.030.
So
this
is
this
is
no
relation
to
theft.
Dui.
Anything
like
that.
This
is
about
a
real
some
type
of
conduct,
relationship
between
a
School
employee
and
a
minor
student.
C
You're
tipped
in
great
legislation,
obviously
dealing
with
an
issue,
that's
pertinent
to
these
times
as.
E
C
Carroll's
question
I
think
Senator
Carol
I
was
listening
to
your
question
great
discussion
there,
the
krs-620.030
cited
on
page
one
may
be
the
the
link
to
address
your
concerns.
Yeah
and
I.
Just
I
just
made
that
jump
myself
so
I
think
that's
pretty
safe.
I
did
have
a
question.
Two
very
brief
questions
at
the
top
of
page
11
and
I.
C
Uncomfortable
with
this
chair,
Tipton,
but
I
need
a
little
bit
of
clarification
from
you.
I
think
I'm
I'm
comfortable
enough
with
it
we're
notwithstanding
KRS
161
151,
which
is
the
language
and
statute.
Currently
that
says,
if
an
allegation
is
found
to
not
be
correct,
that
allegation
is
removed
from
the
record,
this
notwithstands
that
saying
that
all
records
and
references
related
to
an
allegation.
Now
this
is
not
proven
to
be
true.
It's
just
an
allegation.
C
M
M
M
I
believe
from
information
that
I've
just
been
shared
with
me
that
there
are
situations
where
sediments
are
made,
where
Agreements
are
made
and
they're
not,
and
they
are
made
in
such
a
situation
where
they're
not
available
to
the
public,
and
this
is
actually
this
section
of
languages
languages
that
KDE
sent
me
to
include
in
this
bill.
It
was
their
recommendation
that
this
be
in
there.
F
C
A
This
bill
requires
the
allegations
to
stay
in
the
file,
but
it
also
requires
timely
due
process
and
mandates.
The
investigation
be
conducted
and
the
results
the
investigation
also
be
placed
in
the
file
with
it.
So
if
there's
an
exoneration,
the
investigation
will
be
in
a
file,
but
the
exoneration
will
also
be
in
there.
Also,
if
that's
the
case,.
A
Correct
okay;
secondly,
to
the
to
the
question
about
you
know
a
non-disclosure
agreement,
I
think:
don't
we
step
to
the
side
a
little
bit
and
get
into
a
Judicial
proceeding
where
it?
If,
if
we
want
to
open
up
all
non-disclosure
agreements
in
some
cases,
are
we
tying
the
hands
of
the
school
board
attorney
when
you,
when
you
get
into
that
judicial
proceeding
where
they
use
those
non-disclosure
agreements
in
negotiations
on
settlement?
Would
that
be
fair?
A
M
Mr,
chairman
I,
didn't
go
to
law
school
like
you
did,
and
but
the
intent
I'll
just
share
what
I
think
the
intent
is
the
intent
is.
Is
we
want
to
make
sure
there's
transparency
here?
We
want
to
make
sure
that
when
something
like
this
happens,
there's
not
an
attempt
to
cover
it
up
and
put
it
to
the
side.
That
is
the
intent
we
can.
We
can
have
further
discussions
on
that.
If
you'd,
like
Senator.
A
L
M
I
could
give
you
two
or
three
examples:
I
think
teacher
works
at
multiple
school
districts.
M
M
To
me-
and
this
is
my
viewpoint
we
can
discuss
it-
I
mean
if
we
have
a
disagreement,
we
can
talk
about
it.
To
my
to
my
viewpoint,
it's
the
benefit
to
that
teacher
who
had
an
allegation
to
show
that,
yes,
there
was
an
allegation.
There
was
an
investigation,
they
were
exonerated
and
it
shows
it
stays
in
their
record
that
they
were
exonerated
so
that
a
district
who's
considering
hiring
would
have
that
information.
L
Thank
you
Mr
chairman
I,
understand,
because
this
this
is
important
legislation.
L
H
L
L
The
person
who's
looking
at
it
may
take
the
position.
Well,
it's
it's
in
here
some
some
more
just
smoke,
there's
fire!
You
know,
even
though
they
exonerated
I,
think
that
would
be,
in
my
view,
patently
unfair
to
the
individual.
L
M
Opinion
when
I
started
the
conversation
I
said
this
legislation
had
twofold:
we
want
to
protect
our
students
and
we
want
to
protect
the
due
process
rights
of
our
teachers.
I'm
going
to
be
truthful.
We
made
this
legislation.
Tough
I
wanted
to
start
there.
I
want
us
to
have
a
strong
bill
that
we
could
discuss
in
top
points
like
this
and
I
certainly
understand
your
point
and
I
would
be.
I
would
be
willing
to
consider
that
as
something
that
we
might
look
at
I
would
have
no
objection
to.
L
That
well
I,
certainly
trust
your
judgment
and
I'd
like
to
further
the
discussion.
I'm
waffling
myself,
but
that
creates
a
concern
for
me.
It's
all.
Thank
you.
Mr
chairman
appreciate
that
center-wise.
I
M
I
And
so
it
it
says
in
here
that
the
the
superintendent
shall
require
the
individual
to
submit
to
the
background
check,
so
it
doesn't
State
School
Board
would
cover
that
expense.
Is
that
going
to
fall
on
the
individual
teacher
to
pay
for
that
expense
every
five
years
on
their
own?
Was
there
a
discussion
about
KDE
paying
for
this
do
anything
we
need
to
do
with
budget
going.
M
Forward
there
was
no
discussion
about
that.
It
would
be.
It
would
be
my
presumption
that
it
would
be
a
school
board
policy
where
they
paid
for
it
on
their
own
or
required
that
teacher
to
do
that
as
a
condition
of
employment
in
their
contract.
If
you've
got,
we've
got
roughly
44
45
000
teachers
in
the
state.
If
you
divide
that
over
five
years
by
171
school
districts,
obviously
initially
it
might
be
expensive,
but
over
time,
as
you
have
staggered,
employment
I
think
it
would
be
not
an
exceptional
cost.
I
And
and
I'm
all
for
the
background
checks
done
them
many
times
in
my
life,
with
different
professions
and
in
different
situations,
I'm
just
looking
out
for
when
we're
talking
about
recruiting
retaining
teachers
of
a
of
a
cost
that
may
fall
on
them
individually.
If,
if
a
school
board
did
not
do
the
AOC
background
check
and
it
is
the
FBI
background
check
of
125
to
150
dollars,
that's
my
only
concern
is
for
that
teacher
in
a
rural
District
or
an
urban
District.
That's
that's
got
that
expense.
I
M
A
P
You
know,
I
have
a
lot
of
respect
for
you
on
your
work
in
the
field
of
Education.
You
I
think
you're,
aware
of
that.
Going
back
to
the
discussions
you've
had
with
members
of
this
committee
already
this
morning.
P
My
understanding
of
of
that
very
first
paragraph
that
you
that
it's
written
here
is
that
if
a
teacher
has
been
accused,
including
any
any
allegations
or
acts
of
sexual
misconduct,
sexual
misconduct
or
any
allegations
of
child
abuse
dependency
neglect
on
the
chaos
620,
you
don't
want
school
districts
to
enter
any
enter
into
any
kind
of
non-disclosure
agreement
with
regard
to
those
two
areas,
along
with
others,
am
I
correct
on
that?
That's
what
that?
That's!
Your
intent
in
this
in
this
bill.
M
A
public
school
district
or
Public
Charter
School
shall
not
enter
into
a
non-disclosure
agreement
relating
to
a
misconduct
involving
a
minor
or
student,
including
sexual
misconduct,
in
conduct,
subject
to
mandatory
reporting
under
KRS
620.03.
That's
the
intent
that
this
we
have
trans.
The
intent
is
transparency
and
Mr
chairman.
If
I
could
make
a
comment
here,
please
proceed
and
I
understand.
M
Her
name
was
katomi
yokotira
she's
from
Fayette
County,
and
she
testified
how
she
had
a
high
school
teacher
who,
at
the
time
she
did
not
realize,
but
she
she
found
out
later
she
was
being
groomed
and
I
won't
go
into
the
details.
She
was
very
courageous.
She
shared
some
pretty
graphic
details
of
us
in
the
committee
and
I
understand.
We
want
to
protect
the
due
processor
of
her
teachers,
but
this
is
about
the
primary
goal.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
protect
our
students.
M
We
have
an
obligation
to
educate
the
students
of
the
Commonwealth
of
Kentucky
and
they
have
they
have
an
expectancy.
A
parent
has
an
expectancy
when
they
send
their
child
to
school,
they're
going
to
be
safe,
they're
going
to
be
protected
and
I'm
certainly
open
to
all
these
questions
to
understand
the
point
of
due
process.
But
let's
not
forget
why
I
filed
house
bill
288.
A
L
I,
don't
think,
there's
an
issue
there.
In
fact,
I
applaud
you
for
bringing
this
and
I
think
everyone
here
would,
but
it
is
important
any
policy
setting
that
we
do,
that.
We
do
that
as
and
cross
T's
appropriately
and
as
you've
indicated.
That's
what
this
process
is
about,
so
I
just
want
to
say
to
you
and
anybody
else.
That
has
the
impression
that
this
is
more
protective
of
a
teacher
as
opposed
to
the
child
by
weight
of
the
about
virtue
of
the
presentation
of
the
legislation
itself
tells
us
that
we
want
to
protect
the
child.
L
A
We
have
a
motion.
We
have
a
second
from
Central
tissue.
We
had
a,
we
had
a
late
question:
Senator
Carroll
you'll
finish
it
up
here.
N
Thank
you,
Mr
chairman
and
I.
Don't
want
to
get
into
this
too
deep,
but
thinking
about
the
the
child
abuse
registry,
child
abuse,
neglect
registry,
any
any
previous
incident
that
was
reported
that
there
was
substantiated
would
be
on
that
registry
which
would
be
accessible
and
that
background
check
would
be
done
as
part
of
any
new
hire.
I,
don't
know
if,
if
school
districts
do
routine
background
checks
on
every
employee
every
so
so
many
years
it,
what
is
the
correlation?
N
M
However,
it's
my
understanding
that
there
are
no
subsequent
background
checks
later,
and
that
was
the
intent
of
requiring
it
every
five
years
to
see
if
they're,
like
you
say,
there
could
be
an
instance
of
a
child
abuse
situation
that
maybe
the
school
district's
not
aware
of
or
another
situation,
it's
just
it's
just
to
try
and
safeguard
that
situation.
Excellent.
N
M
A
I'm
gonna
cast
my
vote
and
explain.
I
vote
I
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
coach
here,
Tipton
for
wading
into
this
issue,
clearly
full
of
trade-offs,
full
of
balancing
full
of
conflicting
rights
and
appreciate
your
hard
work
on
this
I
vote.
I
House
Bill
288
passes
with
11
eye
votes,
zero,
no
votes,
I
think
from
the
discussion.
Obviously,
we
will
not
go
on
consent
but
appreciate
your
hard
work,
any
other
business
to
come
before
the
committee.