►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Present
and
quorum
all
right,
very
good.
I
need
a
motion
on
our
minutes
for
our
previous
meeting
motion
and
second,
all
those
in
favor
sign
of
eye
opposed.
Likewise
motion
carries
all
right.
We
have
a
very,
very
busy
meeting
and
so
I'd
like
to
ask
each
one
of
those
that
are
going
to
be
presenting
to
please
be
conscious
of
the
other
people
they're
going
to
go,
and
I
will
apologize
to
senator
southwood.
B
C
C
As
you
all
know,
the
psc
periodically
reviews
the
utility
fuel
buying
decisions
and
they're
charged
with
assessing
the
reasonableness
of
those
charges.
C
What
this
bill
does
is
helps
emphasize
the
re,
the
word
reasonableness
and
it
allows
it
allows
the
coal
severance
tax
that
is
added
to
coal
in
the
state
of
kentucky
to
be
considered
reasonable
when
compared
with
coal
contracts
that
do
not
have
a
severance
tax
on
there
and
the
reason
that
it
is
reasonable
is
because
we
all
know
what
coal
severance
tax
does
for
our
community
and
what
it
returns
back
to
the
state
and
those
are
benefits
above
and
beyond
just
the
price
for
the
consumers.
C
I
know
in
webster
county
that
takes
get
some
coal
severance
back.
We've
built
the
senior
citizen
center
we've
built
walking
trails.
We've
done
a
lot
of
good
things
with
this
severance
tax,
so
have.
B
A
motion
and
second
do
you-
have
anybody
else,
that's
going
to
speak
with
you.
I
do
not
very
good.
I
asked
clerk
call
the
roll.
D
E
Mr
chairman
explain
my
vote.
I
think
this
is
a
great
bill,
I'm
proud
to
co-sponsor
it
with
senator
mills
and
I'm
proudly
bold
eye.
Thank
you.
B
I
vote
I
and
the
motions
approve
favorable
your
bill
passes.
Do
I
have
a
motion
put
this
on
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
side
of
I
opposed
likewise
senator
mills.
Thank
you
for
coming
front
of
our
committee
all
right
at
this
time.
I'd
like
to
ask
senator
higdon,
if
he's
in
the
room,
to
go
ahead
up
next
and,
as
we
said
before,
senator
hickman.
Welcome
to
our
committee.
F
There's
150
million
dollars
of
wetland
mitigation
run
by
kentucky
fish
and
wildlife
is
every
year
we
get
money
into
this
fund
and
I
had
a
bill
kind
of
planned
out
and
but
fish
and
wildlife
had
a
had
a
few
questions
and
and
senator
webb
and
her
infinite
wisdom
came
up
with
a
committee
sub
and
the
committee
sub
basically
just
sets
up
a
a
interim
commission
to
to
look
at
look
at
this
issue
and
so,
like
I
said,
the
fees
come
from
the
clean
water
act
in
1972
and
they
they
come
to
kentucky
senator
hegden.
B
F
Well,
and
and
like
I
said
this
senate
bill
261
as
a
minute
by
the
committee
sub,
it's
it's
a
it's
a
jobs
bill
this
this
mitigation,
money
that
comes
down
from
federal
government.
It
needs
to
be
spent
on
a
more
rapid
basis
than
what
is
being
spent
now
and
anyway.
It
sets
up
a
task
force
and
it
reports
to
the
fish
and
wildlife
and
the
lrc.
Mr
chairman,
it's
a
very
simple
bill.
B
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
senator
webb.
You
wish
to
be
recognized.
G
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
add
briefly
about
the
committee
substitute
it
it
just
brings
it.
You
know
we
don't
want
to
be
out
of
compliance
with
federal
law.
This
is
for
a
full
water
issue.
We
have
very
stringent
guidelines
in
the
federal
and
state
law.
There
are
some,
I
think
it's
we
need
to
talk
about
it,
mr
chairman,
on
many
levels
of
you
know
the
companion
department
of
fish
and
wildlife.
G
I
like
I
for
one
like
to
know
what
we're
doing
with
the
mitigation
money
where
that
money's
going
if
it's
distributed
equitably
throughout
the
commonwealth-
and
I
mean
we've-
got
some
great
success
stories
for
habitat
and
and
mitigation
remediation.
These
streams
and
water
lands.
That's
what
it's
for,
but
I
think
you
know
as
as
a
we
need
to
know
more
about
it.
So
I
think
that
the
committee
substitute
enables
enables
that
and
make
sure
we're
in
compliance
with
federal
law.
H
Thank
you
for
recognizing
me,
mr
chairman.
I
just
I
want
to
thank
senator
webb
for
the
sub
and
and
senator
higdon
for
going
along
with
it.
I
this
is
a
big
deal
up
in
our
area,
lots
of
money
involved,
and
I
got
a
call
just
this
morning
that
they
were
hoping
that
they
like
the
sub
and
they
want
to
be
looking
forward
to
a
seat
at
the
table,
and
so
thank
you
for
handling
it.
This
way.
I
I'm
gonna
vote
no
I've.
I've
got
two
or
three
questions
between
the
underlying
bill
and
then,
of
course,
the
sub
here,
which
seems
pretty
straightforward.
I'm
I'm
not
necessarily
opposed
to
it.
I
just
had
some
questions
and
before
I
feel
comfortable
with
an
I
vote,
I'm
going
to
vote
no
today.
Thank
you.
B
Yes,
I
explain
my
vote.
I
think
tom
you
and
I
worked
on
this
bill
almost
two
decades
ago
with
phillip
childers
who,
since
deceased
correct,
put
it
into
motion
to
sort
of
bring
you
all
kicking
and
screaming
sort
of
into
custody
of
this
of
this
funding,
and
it
has
done
some
neat
work
of
the
idea
before
remember.
B
When
a
coal
company
mitigated
a
stream,
they
could
only
write
it
to
two
places:
the
greater
metropolitan
sanitation
district
of
louisville
or
the
salt
river
project.
Both
of
those
are
not
in
the
regions
of
where
the
mine,
the
coal
is
being
mined,
and
so
we've
fixed
that
to
put
this
stuff
back
there
to
mitigate
the
streams
from
where
the
works
actually
being
done,
and
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
good
work
to
be
done
here.
Appreciate
the
history
of
this
and
what
the
chairman's
trying
to
do,
and
I'm
happy
to
vote
on.
Mr.
I
Chairman,
if
it's
all
right,
I'd
like
to
change
my
vote
to
an
eye
so
that
it
can
permit
a
consent,
vote
on
the
bill
and
if
I've
got
an
objection
to
it,
I
can
change
my
vote
at
that
time.
I
don't
want
to
slow
it.
B
B
B
All
right
at
this
time-
and
I
really
appreciate
the
the
committee
and
and
the
audience
letting
us
move
through
these
so
rapidly-
there's
some
of
the
ones
that
are
a
little
bit
more
intricate
we're
trying
to
save
time
for
the
thanks
for
your
patience.
At
this
time
we
have
house
bill
207,
representative
gooch.
If
you
want
to
come
up
and
the
reason
I'm
working
through
the
schedule,
some
of
these
members
advance
and
they
have
other
committee
meetings
they've
got
to
get
to
so.
Thank
you,
representative
gooch.
B
We
know
who
you
are,
but
any
guests
that
are
joining
you.
Please
have
them
recognize
themselves.
K
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
ladies
and
gentlemen
of
the
committee,
we
appreciate
you
your
time
on
this
bill.
I
think
there
is
a
senate
committee
sub.
K
Okay,
thank
you.
This
bill
house,
bill
207,
is
really
just
simply
referred
to
as
the
all
fuels
bill.
You
know.
I
think
that
we
realized
in
kentucky
several
several
years
ago
that
that
to
meet
our
energy
needs
in
an
affordable,
reliable
manner
that
in
kentucky
as
in
the
nation,
we
really
need
an
all
of
the
above
energy
strategy,
and
so
that's
something
that's
very
important.
Also.
The
other
thing
is
that
the
grid,
as
we've
seen
in
in
recent
weeks
in
in
the
united
states
is,
is
very
I
mean
it's.
K
B
Excuse
me:
we
have
a
motion
a
second
at
this
time,
I'd
like
to
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll,
unless
you
want
to
add
more
to.
K
B
I
voted
so
the
motions
reported
favorably.
We
have
a
title
amendment
to
have
a
motion
for
the
title
amendment.
Second,
all
those
in
favor
sign
of
vine
pose
likewise
motion
carries
reported
favorable.
Do
we
want
to
put
this
on
consent
most?
Second,
all
those
in
favor
side
of
eye
opposed
likewise,
chairman
gooch.
Thank
you
all.
I
appreciate
your
work
on
this
bill
and
you're
getting
through
this
committee
quickly.
Thank
you.
Thank.
B
All
right,
that's
given
us
a
little
bit
of
time,
which
I
truly
appreciate,
and
I
think
you
will
too
later
at
this
time
representative
chris
freeland,
I
think,
is
here
and
senator
danny
carroll
with
him
as
well
to
present,
if
you,
gentlemen,
go
ahead
and
come
to
the
table
and
if
you've
got
any
guests
they're
going
to
be
joining,
you
they're
certainly
welcome.
Just
have
them
identify
themselves
for
our
records
and
we'll
turn
the
meeting
over
to
you,
gentlemen,.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chairman,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
I
do
have
representative
jim
duplissy,
who
is
joining
us
today
as
well.
Hb
386
is
an
important
bill
to
the
people
in
western
kentucky
and
across
this
great
state.
The
chemical
manufacturing
industry
in
calvert
city
in
our
district
senator
carrolls,
and
I
employs
thousands
of
kentuckians
from
engineers,
safety
inspectors,
highly
skilled
union
laborers,
local
vendors
and
suppliers
and
more
they're
good-paying
jobs,
and
these
companies
are
an
important
part
of
our
community.
L
They're
environmentally
conscious
spend
millions
of
dollars
each
year
on
technology
and
water
and
air
testing
to
ensure
compliance
and
to
continue
their
excellent
record
and
reputation
in
environmental
and
workforce
safety.
The
kentucky
chamber
also
supports
this
bill
and
mentions
the
fact
that
our
chemical
manufacturers
across
kentucky
employ
more
than
15
000
people
and
in
2019
alone,
accounted
for
more
than
743
million
dollars
in
exports
and
what
hb
386
does
it's
the
result
of
a
change
that
took
place
in
2014
from
a
2004
change
in
kentucky's
regulations
concerning
discharge
limits
in
the
use
of
mixing
zones?
L
B
We
have
a
motion,
a
second
on
the
bill.
Okay,
you
want
to
add
anything
to
it.
Gentlemen:
you
want
to
go
while
you've
got
it
all
right,
very
good.
This
is
a
complex
issue.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
work
that
has
gone
on
behind
the
scenes
and,
as
chairman
and
a
colleague,
I
appreciate
the
work
and
effort
you
all
have
done
the
different
individuals
involved
and
look
forward
to
seeing
how
this
thing
will
turn
out.
So
with
the
motion,
a
second
on
the
video,
oh
I'm
so
tired,
a
thousand
apologies.
B
J
Senator
that's
fine,
and
I
will
be
uncharacteristically
brief,
because
I
don't
want
to
interrupt
the
flow
of
the
meeting.
This
is
a
a
complex
issue.
It's
one
that
affects
westlake
vinyls
who's,
whose
presence
in
marshall,
county
and
western
kentucky
is
a
very
important
economic
presence.
So
we
understand
the
issue.
We
understand
the
concern.
J
I
don't
believe
that
this
bill
does
what
they
are
seeking
and
it
doesn't
provide
regulatory
certainty
and
also
anytime.
You
try
to
do
a
a
legislative
fix
to
a
technical
issue.
You
run
into
unintended
consequences
said
section:
two
of
the
bill
is
going
to
cause
a
pretty
rude
comeuppance
to
about
33
other
companies
that
discharge
through
multi-port
diffusers,
because
when
they
come
up
for
permit
review
again
they're
going
to
lose
the
ability
to
use
two-thirds
of
the
stream
as
their
mixing
zone
they're
going
to
be
held
to
a
much
more
rigorous
standard.
J
So
I'm
going
to
leave
it
at
that
and
tell
you
that
we
are
working
on
a
non-legislative
approach
to
give
westlake
a
path
forward
to
address
their
concerns
regarding
the
uncertainty
and
to
do
so
in
a
responsible
manner,
which
is
what
everybody
seeks.
Senator
carroll
representative
freeland
it
this
it
is,
you
know
when
you're
dealing
with
biological
bioaccumulative
chemicals
of
concern,
there's
a
reason
to
be
very
cautious
about
continuing
a
mixing
zone,
particularly
since
it's
been
about
20
years
to
to
try
to
get
rid
of
the
need
for
mixing
zone.
J
But
we
understand
the
concern
we
understand.
They've
spent
a
lot
of
money
and
and
are
not
trying
to
blow
off
the
issue,
but
are
trying
to
get
some
regulatory
certainty.
So
we
have
committed
out
of
my
abiding
respect
for
senator
carroll
and
my
understanding
of
this
issue.
We
are
doing
everything
we
can
to
work
with
the
cabinet
and
in
order
to
achieve
a
path
forward.
That
will
not
require
the
ultimate
passage
of
this.
But
with
that
I
appreciate
your
time
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
B
G
Thank
you,
I'm
a
former
environmental
prosecutor,
so
you've
got
to
bear
with
me,
but
does
the
cabinet
have
a
position?
I
think
I
know
the
cabinet's
position
based
on
what
tom
interjected,
but
does
the
natural
resource
cabinet
are
like
here
to
test
fire?
Do
they
have
a
position
on
the
bill.
M
I
I
think
they
have
some
concerns
about
the
the
issues
and
that's
what
tom
was
referring
to
and,
and
you
know
those
efforts
are
still
underway
and
there
this
could
be
resolved
as
quickly
as
today,
but
we
did
not
want
to
wait
any
longer
on
the
bill,
but-
and
I
do
want
to
stress
with
this-
that
the
the
dissemination
of
this
chemical
will
not
change,
and
I,
when
I
first
learned
of
this
issue,
we
met
with
westlake
during
the
summer
representative
freeland,
and
I
did-
and
you
know
I'm
I'm
a
little
bit
hesitant
with
anything
being
released
into
the
river.
M
I
checked
with
paducah
water
works,
which
is
the
next
water
supply
facility
down
river
and
asked
them
specifically
about
this
chemical
and
they
advise.
There
are
absolutely
no
issues
with
the
water
quality
related
to
this
chemical,
but
the
cabinet
does
have
some
concerns
and
they're
trying
to
work
through
those.
But
you
know
our
our
stance
is
that
this
has
got
to
be
resolved
some
some
way
or
the
other.
So
I
hope
this
with
the
bill.
Moving
forward,
it's
going
to
provide
some
more
incentive.
This
is
critical
to
our
region.
M
G
B
Very
good
and
I
think
senator
webb
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
when
she
said
prompts
a
resolution.
So
with
this
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
D
Gonna
vote
today
I
was
kind
of
had
big
question
marks
on
this.
As
I
came
in
and
I'd
like
to
get
more
information,
it's
one
of
those
things
I
don't
feel
like
I'm
comfortable
and
able
to
issue
an
informed
opinion
on
as
much
as
I
absolutely
love
addressing
issues
statutorily
and
not
leaving
everything
to
the
cabinets
all
the
time.
Sometimes
we
end
up
creating
a
mess,
and
I'm
not
clear
actually,
which
way
this
thing
really
needs
to
go,
and
so
for
that
reason,
I'm
going
to
vote
pass
right
now.
G
B
B
I
have
a
really
quick
one
that,
for
some
reason,
got
left
off
of
our
agenda
and
we'll
get
that
worked
out,
but
representative
dixon,
with
209.
B
N
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
Thank
you
committee.
This
is
a
consorted
effort
between
the
commissioner
of
agriculture,
ryan
corals
and
myself.
This
bill
house
bill
209
does
two
simple
things.
N
I
apologize
thank
you,
chairman
smith.
This
this
bill
does
two
things
house
bill.
209
does
two
things
to
the
current
law.
It
actually
adds
a
cooperative
extension
definition
to
mean
the
university
of
kentucky
and
the
kentucky
state
cooperative
extension
service
to
the
current
law
in
place
for
donation
of
game
meet,
and
then
it
also
adds
for
those
cooperative
agencies
to
be
able
to
donate
that
gay
meat
and
to
put
cooking
or
excuse
me
to
have
cooking
classes
and
conduct
those
cooking
classes
with
that
said,
that's
all
I
have
at
this
point.
G
B
I
vote
I,
the
motion,
as
proof
is
approved,
favorably,
to
have
a
motion
for
consent
motion.
Second,
like
the
second,
for
that
all
those
in
favor
side
of
eye
opposed.
Likewise,
we
have
young
consent.
Thanks
again
for
your
patience,
I
apologize
for
the
fact
we
didn't
have
you
on
there
after
meeting
with
me
and
seeing
me
yesterday,
and
I
appreciate
the
patience
of
this
committee.
Yes,
thank
you,
chairman
smith.
Thank
you
committee.
Members.
Very
good.
Thank
you.
Okay.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
ask
senator
southwood
to
southworth.
B
And
I
want
to
thank
her
for
her
patience.
She
was
actually
on
deck
to
be
first
today
and
has
been
very,
very
patient
to
allow
us
to
let
the
some
of
these
other
people
with
schedule
conflicts
to
go
so
go
ahead
and
come
to
the
table.
If
you
have
anybody
with
you,
please
go
ahead
and
have
them
identify
themselves
and,
let's
turn
the
mic
over
to
you.
D
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
do
not
have
anybody
with
me
today,
because
this
is
a
pretty
simple
bill
and
I
feel
like
it
speaks
for
itself
to
some
degree.
If
you
look
at
the
co-sponsor
list,
all
of
us
are
senators
who
represent
districts
in
counties
attached
to
the
kentucky
river,
and
this
it's
a
simple
bill,
although
it
looks
worse
than
that.
So
let
me
just
walk
you
through
on
page
one,
the
first
two
paragraphs
there.
D
This
is
currently
in
regulatory
language,
it's
appropriate
to
bring
it
into
the
statute
so
that
we
can
establish
the
rest
of
the
context
for
the
bill
and
what
is
the
kentucky
river
basin
and,
as
you
said,
mr
chairman,
on
monday
we
took
a
moment
of
silence
for
those
who
are
experiencing
flooding.
I
think
we're
all
a
lot
more
acutely
aware
of
where
our
rivers
are
located
and
our
neighbors
and
friends
who
are
affected
when
things
happen
regarding
rivers.
D
This
is
that
bill.
That
brings
us
together
as
neighbors.
Perhaps
none
of
us
would
be
together
on
any
single
issue
in
any
other
time,
but
what
we
do
here
affects
our
constituents
and
that's
why
I'm
bringing
this
bill
now.
I
do
have
to
think
that
drafters
and
our
staff,
who
find
all
kinds
of
things
all
the
time,
wording
wise.
It
needs
fixed
grammar
and
so
forth,
but
there's
nothing
actually
in
this
bill.
That's
not
already
current.
D
Besides
that
regulatory
language
at
the
top,
and
then,
if
you
go
to
the
very
last
line
of
page
one,
it
says
ten
other
persons
who
shall
be
residents
of
the
kentucky
river
basin
and
members
of
committee.
This
is
what
this
bill's
about
when
a
board
that
is
put
together
by
our
state
authority
affects
a
certain
jurisdiction.
In
this
case.
It's
the
kentucky
river
authority
and
we
bring
in
other
members
from
other
places
that
they're
not
rate
payers.
D
They
don't
know
anything
about
the
river,
or
at
least
don't
have
a
personal
interest
in
that
I
feel
like
that's,
not
necessarily
right.
We
see
this
in
a
lot
of
boards
and
we
see
this
in
a
lot
of
different
areas
in
our
state
and
it's
one
of
those
things
that
we
need
to
bring
awareness
to
on
all
fronts.
But
this
is
just
one
little
tiny
step
forward
that
we
can
do
to
at
least
get
the
people
who
have
the
interest
to
our
the
rate
payers
being
the
ones
representing
each
other
on
this
authority
board.
D
Chairman
I
hate
to
interrupt,
but
I
wanted
to
find
out
if
we
could
keep
this
off
consent
because
of
the
nature
of
the
kentucky
river
issue
right
now,
I
would
like
to
bring
it
on
the
floor
at
the
request
of
my
constituents.
B
And
last
but
not
least,
my
old
colleague
senator
sal
senator.
If
you
want
to
come
to
the
table
and
if
you
have
any
guests
with
you,
let
them
go
and
identify
themselves
for
a
record,
and
I
appreciate
your
patience
as
we
work
through
this
heavy
committee.
Thank
you
identify.
P
O
Mr
chairman
and
members
of
the
committee,
thank
you
all
for
having
us
today.
This
bill
is
a
compromise
bill
between
the
utilities
and
excavators,
as
chairman
santoro
referred
to
it
passed
94
to
zero
out
of
the
house
would
certainly
like
to
thank
him
for
working
with
those
groups
that
have
raised
concerns
from
the
utility
perspective.
This
gives
us
additional
time
to
get
out
and
locate
our
lines
with
over
20
billion
dollars
of
investment
in
kentucky
right
now,
it's
really
creating
a
backlog
for
us
to
be
able
to
go
out
and
locate.
O
So
excavation
can
begin
on
the
flip
side
for
the
excavators.
One
of
the
big
concerns
that
they
have
is,
if
they're
not
able
to.
If
we
are
the
utilities,
not
responding
within
the
time
frames
outlined
in
the
law,
they're
still
being
held
liable
for
causing
damage,
and
so
this
would
wave
that
liability
with
the
exception
of
natural
gas
or
hazardous
liquids.
Obviously,
there's
a
major
life
safety
concern
there.
O
Beyond
that
it
increases
communication
between
the
excavators
and
utilities.
By
creating
a
positive
response
system,
we
as
a
utility
are
required
to
go
in
and
update
the
system
to.
Let
them
know
what
we've
been
out
to
locate.
Currently,
they
may
come
out
to
a
site
and
not
see
any
markings
on
the
ground
and
just
assume
that
it's
safe
to
begin
digging.
This
would
give
them
certainty
when
they
get
out
there
that
they
that
we've
actually
been
out
there
to
locate.
O
It
also
allows
for
you
know,
say
it's
a
rainy
day
and
a
home
builder
wants
to
call
in
their
next
20
projects
under
the
current
law
if
they
don't
get
out
there
within
10
days.
Those
tickets
expire
under
this
bill
that
chairman
santoro
has
come
up
with.
It
would
allow
for
the
excavator
to
reach
out
to
the
utility
and
set
time
frames
out
in
the
future,
so
we
could
get
out
there
to
locate
according
to
their
schedule.
It
gives
us
more
time
to
locate
it,
allows
them
to
to
fulfill
these
tickets
without
letting
them
expire.
H
I
vote
ryan
I'd
like
to
explain
my
vote.
Please
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I'm
glad
to
see
this
bill.
It
looks
like
it's
going
to
pass.
Finally
because-
and
my
views
have
evolved
this
over
the
last
couple
years
and
these
contractors
I
know
especially
the
little
guys-
have
a
tough
tough
time,
and
so
it's
I'm
glad
that
representative
centauri
brought
this
forward
and
it
looks
like
it's
going
to
pass.
G
I'm
going
to
explain
since
there's
already
passed,
I'm
going
to
vote.
I
I
mean
that
I've
too
have
had
conflicted
thoughts
on
this
legislation
and
this
concept,
I've
known
people
that
have
been
caught
up
in
it
in
a
very
bad
way.
Like
senator
schickel
said
you
know,
and
especially
the
little
guy,
and
but
you
know,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
vote
eye
today
and
I
appreciate
the
work
that
everybody's
put
into
it,
and
maybe
this
issue
will
be
at
rest.
I
Let
me
explain
my
vote,
mr
chairman.
Yes,
you
may
also
vote.
I,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
folks
for
for
coming
to
some
sort
of
an
agreement
instead
of
bringing
yet
another
fight
before
this
committee
and
this
legislative
body,
so
I
greatly
appreciate
the
work
that's
gone
into
it.
Thank
you.
I
A
B
As
before
we
adjourn,
I
just
want
to
brag
on
this
committee.
I
will
tell
you,
having
chaired
this
committee
in
the
past
and
again
now.
This
is
an
exceptional
committee
to
be
able
to
handle
the
type
of
work
that
we
just
went
through,
and
I
appreciate
each
and
every
one
of
you
efforts
on
this
part
so
with
a
motion
to
adjourn.