►
From YouTube: Senate Standing Committee on Judiciary (3-10-22)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Thank
you
for
your
question.
Senator
at
is
actually
an
existing
division
within
the
department
of
corrections.
We're
just
modifying
the
name
and
moving
it
out
to
represent
that
it's
providing
services
to
all
of
those
individuals
served
under
the
department
of
corrections,
including
inmates
in
our
prison
facilities,
as
well
as
offenders
on
community
supervision.
C
C
C
C
F
C
All
right
we're
going
to
take
up
the
chairman's
bill
senate
bill
271.
Next,
an
act
relating
to
domestic
violence.
Very
simply
put
this
was
not
an
issue
that
was
on
my
radar.
C
I
was
contacted
by
linda
blackford
with
the
herald
leader
sometime
back
at
the
tail
end
of
last
year,
and
she
mentioned
something
to
me
about
our
sexual
assault
and
domestic
violence
organizations
here
in
kentucky
kcatv
and
k-sap,
essentially
having
to
rely
on
google
news
alerts
to
track
data
on
domestic
violence
cases,
and
I
I
forget
what
the
substance
of
call
was,
but
that
particular
thing
just
smacked
me
in
the
face
and
and
made
it
really
painfully
obvious
that
that's
a
problem
that
we're
not
tracking
that
that
we
don't
identify
that
that
we
don't
follow.
C
That
is
a
failing
of
of
state
government.
We
can't
make
good
public
policy
decisions
on
domestic
violence
or
anything
else
for
that
matter,
without
good
data
to
show
us
what's
going
on
and
that's
what
this
bill
does.
Thank
you
from
senator
schickel.
Second,
from
senator
wheeler.
I
appreciate
that
anybody
have
any
questions
of
the
bill.
G
I'm
going
to
vote
to
get
it
out.
I
just
wonder
if
you'd
agree
to
add
additional
information,
such
as
how
many
court
systems
provide
counseling
or
training
I
know
and
where
I'm
from
they
have
a
program,
that
the
judge
orders
them
to
go
certain
training
and
they're
going
to
reconcile
and
those
kind
of
things.
So
we
can
get
true
statistical
data
yeah
from
all
areas.
C
C
Thank
you.
I
shouldn't
have
said
that
was
a
terrible
choice
of
words
and
I
said
smack
me
in
the
face,
and
that
was
a
terrible
choice
of
words,
and
I
don't
mean
to
make
light
of
that,
and
I
don't
mean
to
it
just
occurred
to
me
that
I
said
that,
but
it
was
a
jarring,
a
jarring,
a
revelation
that
linda
brought
to
my
attention.
She
has
since
written
on
that
and
I'm
glad
that
she
did.
C
I
give
her
credit
for
it
and
the
credit
of
our
domestic
violence
and
sexual
assault
service
providers
in
the
state
for
doing
what
they
do
every
day
and,
frankly,
for
doing
it
with
with
not
enough
resources
and
clearly
not
without
the
information
this
bill
hopefully
will
provide.
So
thank
you
for
the
motion
of
the
second
seeing
no
further
questions.
Mr
secretary,
please
call
the
roll.
D
C
Aye
bill
passes
again
with
favorable
expression
on
a
seven
to
nothing
vote
members.
I
greatly
appreciate
that
I'll
entertain
a
motion
for
consent
motion
from
senator
schickel,
second
from
senator
wheeler.
C
C
All
right
do
we
have
I'm
looking
to
see
if
we've
got
what
sponsors
we've
got
here
in
the
room,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
take
up
a
couple
of
house
bills.
I
know
I've
got
representative
or
chairman
ed
massey.
Is
he
with
us
this
morning?
I
think
I
saw
him
walk
in,
got
it
all
right
if
you'll,
but
right,
if
you'll
buzz,
roberta
or
tap
hurt,
let
somebody
text
or
wave
jump
up
and
down.
Let
me
know
when
you're
ready
to
go
all
right
representative
pratt
with
house
bill
48.
C
E
No
pressure
there,
thank
you
chairman
and
member
of
the
committee.
This
is
a
bill
we
heard
in
interim,
it's
house
bill
48,
it's
swatting
much
like
me.
When
I
heard
about
this,
I
thought
what
is
swatting.
Swatting
is
basically
when
you
make
a
fake
911
call
that
requires
a
response
team,
usually
a
swat
team.
It
was
brought
to
my
attention
by
the
scott
cain
sheriff
tony
hampton.
A
couple
in
georgetown
was
swatted,
actually
I'll,
give
also
channel
18
wlax
kudos
for
carrying
the
story
and
making
the
public
aware
of
it.
I
want
to
thank
again.
E
The
sky
county
sheriff
took
this
situation.
Where
someone
made
a
fake
9-1-1
call
said
they
basically
killed.
The
family
was
holding
hostages,
they
realized
something's
wrong.
They
defused
this
very
quickly
and
luckily,
but
even
that
the
late,
the
lady
of
the
house,
almost
did
not
come
out
now.
This
does
have
deadly
consequences.
As
we
look
at
this,
it
not
only
puts
innocent
people's
lives
in
danger.
It
puts
the
first
responders
lives
in
danger.
There's
actually
been
a
case
in
tennessee
where
a
gentleman
owned
the
hashtag
tennessee
a
gentleman
wanted.
It
was
online
gamer.
E
C
E
A
G
And
I
may
I
I'm
sorry,
I
hadn't
read
it
and
asked,
but
there's
some
ifs
about
where
you're
going
to
be
prosecuting.
If
where
the
restitution
is
going
to
be
made,
I
didn't
actually.
E
Again,
it
really
won't
make
it
a
felony
is
because
most
of
these
calls
come
from
out
of
state
and
it's
only
a
felony,
the
lowest
level
felony,
it
doesn't
say
you
have
to
prosecute
it.
It
just
allows
if
your
local
law
enforcement
would
like
to
do
it.
They
can,
but
there
is
actual
restitution
language
in
here
that
if
you
pursue
it,
they
can
actually
pursue
the
cost
of
going
and
get
catching
the
perpetrator
of
this
crime.
I.
G
E
H
A
Mr
chairman
explain
my
vote.
Yes,
sir
yeah,
like
senator
schickel,
I
guess
I
was
under
the
mistaken
impression
we
kind
of
voted
on
it
too,
but
I
think
it's
a
really
good
bill
and
I
I
thank
miss
representative
pratt
for
bringing
it.
I
see
that
this
could
result
in
some
very
tragic
circumstances
and
that
it
has
so
I
think
it's
a
a
very
good
piece
of
legislation.
C
C
I'm
going
to
go
now
to
senate
bill
321
an
act
relating
to
abortion.
We've
got
senator
max
wise
here
with
us.
C
Senator
you
have
the
floor
and
while
your
guests,
one
of
your
guests,
is
certainly
no
stranger
to
us
and
is
a
good
friend.
Your
other
guest
is
a
new
member
of
the
the
team
of
folks
that
that
frequent,
the
building,
if
you'll,
have
them
introduced
themselves.
You
have
the
floor,
sir.
I
A
I
I
The
court's
acceptance
of
this
case
was
interpreted
to
be
a
willingness
to
revisit
the
principles
of
the
1973
roe
vs
wade
decision
in
part,
because
roe
was
based
upon
what
is
now
outdated,
an
erroneous
understandings
of
the
viability
of
an
unborn
child.
The
case
was
argued
on
december
1st
of
2021,
and
the
oral
argument
further
conformed,
the
belief
of
legal
observers
that
the
court
was
willing
to
either
overturn
roe,
vs
wade
or
significantly
revise
it,
and
a
written
decision
is
expected
to
be
in
late
june
or
early
july.
I
This
legislation,
before
you
send
bill
321,
is
closely
modeled
after
the
mississippi
legislation
that
is
before
the
supreme
court.
I'm
bringing
this
bill
to
you
so
that,
in
the
event
that
the
supreme
court
upholds,
the
mississippi
legislation
is
constitutional.
We
will
have
a
pro-life
law
in
place
that
would
not
be
subject
to
a
good
faith.
Legal
challenge.
I
I
Bill
321
also
gives
the
attorney
general
and
the
state
board
of
medical
licensure
specific
authority
to
bring
an
action
in
law
or
equity
to
enforce
any
provision
of
the
law.
As
you
all
remember,
the
general
assembly
in
2019
pass
legislation
prohibiting
the
performance
of
an
abortion
with
some
exceptions.
If
a
fetal
heartbeat
is
detected,
a
federal
district
court
entered
an
injunction
against
the
enforcement
of
this
legislation.
I
The
upcoming
ruling
by
the
u.s
supreme
court
in
the
mississippi
dobbs
case
may
result
in
the
2019
fetal
heartbeat
statues
being
deemed
constitutional
and
enforceable,
but
we
simply
do
not
know.
What
we
do
know,
however,
is
that
if
the
u.s
supreme
court
ultimately
rules
the
mississippi
bill
to
be
a
constitutional
limitation
on
abortion
senate
bill
321,
the
bill
before
you
today
would
withstand
challenge
and
be
immediately
enforceable.
I
ask
for
your
support
of
this
important
legislation
and
I
asked
if
my
guest
would
like
to
make
a
very
brief
comment.
A
Thank
you,
chairman
members
of
the
committee
on
behalf
of
kentucky
right
to
life
in
our
chapters
throughout
the
state
and
pro-life
kentuckians.
I
want
to
say
thank
you
senator
wise
for
this
very
timely
and
wise
and
wise
piece
of
legislation
and
thank
the
members
of
the
committee
for
the
willingness
to
to
hear
this
bill
and
ask
for
the
support.
A
This
is
just
another
step
forward
as
we
move
forward
in
protecting
those
that
do
not
have
a
voice
for
themselves
and
that's
kentucky's,
unborn
children.
So
I'd
ask
would
be
brief
and
that's
that's
about
as
brief
as
I
can
be.
Thank
you,
mr
walls.
Yes,
thank
you,
chairman
westerfield
and
the
committee.
I
will
be
brief
as
well
on
behalf
of
the
family
foundation.
We
are
in
strong
support
of
senate
bill
321
and
it's
common
sense.
Pro-Life
protections
as
as
senator
weiss
is
laid
out.
A
This
is
a
a
common
sense
and
prudent
pro-life
law
for
for
the
legislature
to
act
on
this
session,
and
we
are
in
strong
support
and
appreciate
senator
wise
leadership
on
this
issue
and
y'all's
consideration.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
going
to
have
the
the
opponents
that
have
signed
up
to
speak,
come
up
and
and
address
the
committee
now,
if
that's
all
right,
but
senator
I'm
going
to
give
you
the
last
word
on
the
bill.
If
you
want
to
have
any
closing
thoughts
after
them
or
field
any
questions,
we've
got
folks
from
planned
parenthood
in
the
aclu
and
a
citizen
that
have
all
signed
up.
You're.
All
welcome
to
to
step
up
here.
C
J
Ahead,
oh
okay,
I'll
get
going
so
hi
everyone
thanks
for
having
us
today.
My
name
is
dr
brittany
myers,
as
I
said,
and
I'm
an
ob
gyn
resident
here
in
kentucky,
I'm
finishing
up
my
training
here
this
june.
So,
as
my
training
has
been
at
one
of
the
larger
referral
hospitals
in
the
state,
I've
been
afforded.
What
I
think
is
a
unique
perspective
where
I've
cared
for
women
from
all
over
the
state
that
have
come
to
get
care.
J
Having
all
these
unique
encounters
has
made
me
confident
that
I
can
properly
speak
for
and
represent
the
women
of
this
state
with
a
wide
breadth,
because,
regardless
of
what
this
bill
implies,
I
believe
that
truth
and
representation
truly
does
matter
in
this
issue
to
become
fully
transparent
to
you
all
today.
I
kind
of
struggled
with
the
idea
of
whether
or
not
I
should
come,
and
it's
not
because
of
my
lack
of
belief
that
women
should
be
provided
safe,
abortion
care,
but
it's
because
I've
been
here
in
this
situation
before
and
I
feel
like.
J
J
J
If
I
were
to
ask
the
most
simple
of
questions
to
you
all
or
to
the
people
that
raised
this
bill
like
15
weeks,
why
was
that
chosen?
What
embryologic
development
has
occurred
at
that
time?
Why
that
gestational
age?
I
highly
doubt
that
anyone
would
actually
be
able
to
give
me
a
medically
substantial,
evidence-based
answer
for
years.
You've
heard
countless
stories
from
providers
like
myself
and
people
from
the
community
like
you'll,
hear
today
that
share
their
unimaginable
tragedies,
and
these
tragedies
will
become
more
frequent
and
even
worse,
if
a
ban
like
this
is
implemented.
J
My
final
thoughts
on
this
abortion
ban,
this
15-week
ban
won
15
weeks.
This
theoretical
gestational
age
chosen
with
no
regard
for
actual
embryologic
developmental
milestones.
Two,
this
ban
is
oozing
with
non-medical
terminology
and
misinformation
regarding
the
safety
and
the
truth
of
the
procedures
that
we
can
treat.
Patients
with
three
the
band
destroys
the
sanctity
of
the
patient
physician
relationship.
J
Four.
This
man
calls
into
question
sexist
implications
that
women
and
their
providers
are
unable
to
make
their
own
informed
decisions,
and
then
it
also
tries
to
frighten
and
vilify
physicians
like
myself,
into
providing
subpar
care,
and
I
simply
cannot
safely
provide
the
care
and
honestly
tell
my
patients
that
the
care
I'm
providing
is
what's
best
for
them.
J
K
My
name
is
shawn
trees,
I'm
a
resident
of
jefferson
county
in
2020.
I
started
a
program
called
feed.
The
west.
We
gave
more
than
50
000
people
in
the
west
end.
K
All
right,
it's
my
first
testimony
y'all
bear
with
me,
so
my
name
is
sean
trees,
I'm
a
resident
in
jefferson,
county,
I'm
a
mother
and
in
2020
during
the
pandemic.
I
work
to
give
free
groceries
to
more
than
80
000
people
in
the
west
end
and
around
the
west
end.
I've
been
able
to
raise
over
a
million
dollars
for
organizations
that
support
people
who
are
either
low-income
or
under-resourced.
K
I've
been
able
to
do
all
these
things
because
in
college
I
got
an
abortion.
Now
some
of
you
may
think
that's
far-fetched,
but
for
people
who
come
from
backgrounds
where
you're,
the
first
generation
college
student
or
you
don't
have
as
many
resources
or
you're
on
food
stamps.
For
us
things
are
more
possible
when
we're
not
forced
to
do
things
like
have
a
child
that
we're
not
prepared
for
mentally
and
financially,
because
I
had
that
abortion
in
college.
I
was
able
to
do
all
these
things
I
listed
and
more.
K
K
Obviously
I
have
a
child
right.
Ultimately,
I
had
to
drive
out
of
state
to
get
the
care
I
needed.
I
was
incredibly,
it
was
incredibly
challenging
and
a
massive
financial
burden.
As
a
college
student
who
was
on
financial
assistance
who
was
on
scholarship,
who
had
two
jobs,
I
had
to
take
off
work
take
off
school
to
drive
to
another
state,
to
get
care
that
I
needed
my
boyfriend
and
I
were
forced
to
listen
to
a
sonogram
machine
and
then
sent
away.
K
We
could
only
afford
a
dirty
hotel
that
we
had
to
stay
in
overnight
just
to
come
back
the
next
day.
Abortion
will
always
be
available
for
people
with
money.
Restricting
access
to
safe
abortion
only
hurts
poor
people.
Forcing
people
to
stay
pregnant
against
their
will
does
nothing
more
than
prevent
us
from
breaking
the
generational
curse
of
poverty.
This
bill
is
a
poverty
trap.
It
is
not
always
possible
for
someone
to
get
an
abortion
as
soon
as
they
have
made
the
decision
to
do
so.
K
Many
things
can
stand
in
the
way
from
delays
and
finding
out
you're
pregnant
to
not
being
able
to
afford
it
to
a
lack
of
providers.
Nearby
or
barriers
put
in
place
by
politicians
such
as
bans
on
insurance,
covering
abortion
and
mandatory
delays,
and
I
won't
be
much
longer
don't
worry.
People
should
make
decisions
about
pregnancy
with
those
they
trust
and
medical
professionals
not
have
those
decisions
dictated
by
politicians.
K
K
We
spoke
a
lot
today
and
we've
spoken
a
lot
ongoing
about
this
in
kentucky,
and
I
love
this
state.
I
love
kentucky,
I'm
proud
of
it
everywhere.
I
go.
I
tell
people
I'm
from
louisville
kentucky,
but
I
would
be
more
proud
if
we
would
listen
to
women
listen
to
people
who
actually
have
a
uterus
to
make
these
decisions.
L
Hi,
my
name
is
tamara
wieder.
I'm
the
kentucky
state
director
for
planned
parenthood
alliance
advocates
I'll,
be
quick
with
my
comments,
but
I
want
to
be
clear
that
we
already
have
a
15-week
ban.
That
is
functionally
the
same
as
the
legislation
before
you.
This
unconstitutional
law
was
passed
in
2018
and
it
is
still
working
its
way
through
the
courts
as
part
of
a
year's
long
legal
challenge
senate
bill
321
doesn't
do
anything
that
our
state
hasn't
already
done.
It
attempts
to
imitate
mississippi's
15-week
ban,
which
is
currently
under
review
by
the
u.s
supreme
court.
L
C
M
M
M
Some
have
suggested
that
a
ban
on
abortion
at
15
weeks
is
a
reasonable
compromise,
but
I'm
here
to
tell
you
that
there's
nothing
reasonable
about
an
abortion
ban,
and
I
know
that
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
speak
and
I
want
to
say
thank
you
to
everyone.
Who's
testified
today
and
thank
you
for
allowing
us
to
speak.
C
C
Matthew
ask
you
to
keep
your
comments,
mr
matthew,
and
I
don't
know
if
I'm
saying
your
last
name
correctly
took
a
couple
of
minutes.
If
you
can
please
thank
you.
F
Hi,
my
name
is
rob
matthew.
Civics
is
defined
by
merriam-webster
as
a
social
science
dealing
with
the
rights
and
duties
of
citizens.
It's
something
that
the
sponsor
of
this
bill
has
indicated
is
lacking
today,
and
I
don't
disagree
so
during
this
women's
history
month
in
the
spirit
of
doing
my
duty
as
a
citizen,
I'm
speaking
out
today,
to
protect
the
rights
of
my
daughter,
wife
and
other
women
in
kentucky
by
asking
that
you
all
vote
no
on
this
and
all
abortion
bills,
roe
vs
wade
was
decided
decades
ago.
It
didn't
mandate
abortion.
F
It
didn't
say
that
women
couldn't
follow
their
faith,
conscience
of
their
own
personal
belief
system.
When
making
a
decision
about
abortion
didn't
take
away
their
right
to
include
anyone
they
wanted
in
that
decision.
Roe
vs
wade
is
a
legal
decision
that
simply
protects
the
rights
of
american
women
to
make
choices
about
abortion.
It's
a
right
that
has
been
in
place
for
almost
my
entire
51
years
of
existence
having
an
abortion
should
be
the
personal
choice
of
a
woman
in
consultation
with
a
physician
and
the
people.
F
F
One
could
argue
that
if
lawmakers
were
concerned
about
your
own
civic
duties
as
an
american
and
were
actually
pro-life,
you'd
acknowledge
that
abortion
is
indeed
a
right
and
focus
your
time
on
passing
bills
that
actually
improve
and
support
life
for
people
from
ages.
One
day
to
101
years,
instead,
we've
seen
an
onslaught
of
bills
that
intentionally
are
by
design
hurt
the
least
among
us.
Just
yesterday
we
saw
a
couple
of
representatives
mock
the
concern
about
the
suicide
rate
among
transgender
youth.
F
We've
seen
the
concerns
of
the
chronically
ill
and
their
families
ignored,
because
they
may
slightly
inconvenience
us
during
the
covet
crisis.
We've
seen
tax
and
education
bills
that
help
that
help
the
well
off
but
hurt
the
poor.
In
the
middle
class
we've
seen
all
day,
kindergarten
get
cut
and
bills
to
reduce
unemployment
benefits
for
the
jobless.
We've
seen
the
comments
of
children,
their
parents
ignored,
so
we
can
pass
laws
based
in
hate.
F
Maybe
you
think
my
words
are
mean
hateful
or
unfair.
If
so,
I
ask
that
you
simply
reach
into
your
pro-life
vocabulary
and
think
of
me
as
a
sidewalk
counselor
for
politicians.
Of
course,
unlike
a
sidewalk
counselor,
I
had
to
walk
through
layers
of
security
and
sign
up
to
speak.
Unlike
a
sidewall
counselor,
I
don't
have
any
illusions
that
my
words
are
going
to
change
your
mind
and,
unlike
a
sidewalk
counselor,
what
happens
behind
these
doors
actually
is
everyone's
business
and
worthy
of
con
condemnation
by
the
public.
F
C
H
Thank
you,
and
I
was
actually
planning
on
addressing
my
question
to
our
one
of
our
residents-
who's
no
longer
at
the
table,
but
I
would
like
to
reiterate
a
statement.
H
C
H
Have
a
big
question:
you
know
there
was
a
a
comment
made
that
abortion
will
always
be
available
to
women
with
money,
and
I
can
tell
you
I
am
60
years
old.
I
was
raised
by
a
surgeon.
I
know
for
a
fact
that
in
the
past
before
abortion
was
it
was
legal
in
this
state.
H
Applying
to
everybody,
my
question
is:
with
women
single
women
in
this
state,
making
an
average
of
30
percent
lower
than
men
do.
That's
all
comers
average
male
salary
in
this
date,
42
000
average
female
salary
in
the
state,
30
almost
31
000,
a
single
head
of
household
female,
a
female
single
head
of
household's
chance
of
being
in
poverty
in
this
state
is
higher
than
any
other
subcategory
of
women.
H
K
K
C
K
A
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
One
question
two
parts
I'll
make
it
quick.
My
question
is,
for
dr
myers
you've
told
us
that
you
disagree
from
a
medical
perspective
with
the
viability
provisions
that
are
in
the
bill
in
your
medical
opinion.
At
what
point
do
you
think
during
the
gestation
period
that
the
baby
becomes
viable
and
then
second
part
of
my
question
would
be
you
know
upon
your
definition
of
viability?
J
Thanks
for
your
question,
so
there's
a
pretty
clean
cut
viability,
cut
off,
which
our
state
already
represents.
Respects,
which
is
24
weeks,
is
a
hard
viability
cut
off.
We
know
after
24
weeks,
that's
a
viable
fetus
and
by
viability,
meaning
this
fetus
could
survive
outside
of
the
mother
without
the
support
of
the
mother.
What
was
the
second
part
of
your
question.
J
J
Together.
That's
that's
that
sanctity.
I'm
talking
about
that.
We
should
be
able
to
have
that
bond
and
trust,
because
there's
very
few
people
that
have
this
intimate
relationship
with
another
individual
that
an
ob
gyn
does
with
their
patients
even
more
than
some
people
have
with
their
other
family
members.
J
So
my
best
interest
is
the
patient
and
I
think
it's
everything
should
be
individualized
on
each
situation,
which
is
why
blanket
policies
like
this
can
never
address
every
individual
situation,
and
you
should
have
the
trust
in
your
education,
your
physicians
and
the
the
city
and
the
countries
that
you
live
in
in
the
states
to
respect
that
autonomy
between
that
those
two
people.
It
shouldn't
be
interfered
on
by
the
people
that
don't
know
the
situation.
C
G
Turner,
thank
you.
Mr
chairman.
You've
testified
that
24
weeks
the
child
can
be
viable
living
come
out
loud.
Can
you
tell
us
in
your
opinion,
when
does
that
child
start
feeling.
J
Like
sensations.
J
Good
question:
so
the
american
college
of
obstetrics
and
gynecology
actually
released
a
statement
on
this,
and
it
was
in
response
to
some
of
the
comments
made
by
president
trump
during
his
presidency,
and
the
nervous
system
is
one
of
the
most
complex
systems
in
our
body
that
we
still
don't
even
completely
fully
understand
as
physicians
how
the
brain
works.
We
know,
there's
area
things
we
don't
understand,
nerves
are
in
place
very
early
on
they're
developed.
You
have
the
ability
to
have
you
have
nerves
that
can
feel
receptors.
J
We
do
not
see
higher
level
nervous
system
of
development
until
almost
the
third
trimester,
where
the
fetus
is
able
to
regulate
and
appropriately
respond
to
their
environment.
When
we
monitor
babies,
we
see
a
very
obvious
switch
of
when
they
start
having
this
homeostasis,
where
both
their
nervous
systems,
the
sympathetic
and
parasympathetic
work
together,
and
you
can
see
them
respond
to
their
environment
and
that's
at
a
third
trimester
which
is
almost
three
months
past.
What
we're
talking
about
now.
C
Thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you.
Senator
I'm
going
to
ask
if
senator
wise
and
adea
can
come
back
up
to
give
any
closing
thoughts.
The
ladies
thank
you
and
then
we're
gonna
vote.
The
bill.