►
From YouTube: House Standing Committee on Local Government (2-16-22)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Representative
donahue,
yes,
ma'am,
present
reps
into
fleming
present
in
the
room
representative,
fraser
gordon
president,
in
the
room
representative
huff
president
in
my
annex
office
representatives
here
in
the
room
representative
johnson
here
in
the
room
representative,
koenig
representative
lockett.
Here.
A
Yes,
ma'am
present,
we
do
have
several
guests
today.
I
want
to
welcome
our
friends
from
the
jailers
association,
who
are
here
on
top
of
our
other
folks,
that
we
normally
have
from
caico
klc
the
firefighters
association,
fop
and
other
groups,
but
I
do
have
one
really
special
guest
that
I
want
to
to
recognize
who's
here
today,
a
former
member
of
this
committee,
former
member
of
this
body,
our
good
friend,
former
representative
john
sims,
from
fleming
counties.
Here
we
want
to
just
welcome
him
back
to
the
committee
today.
F
We
will
be
hearing
house
bill
476
first
representative,
if
you'd
like
to
introduce
yourself
and
your
guests
the
floors.
A
Thank
you,
madam
chair
house,
bill
476
is
a
relatively
simple
piece
of
legislation.
It
is
a
companion
bill
to
house
bill
475,
which
is
a
constitutional
amendment
relating
to
local
taxation.
That
will
be
heard
tomorrow
in
elections
constitutional
amendments
committee
at
ten
o'clock.
What
this
bill
does
is
very
simple.
It
just
keeps
the
status
quo
as
it
is.
A
H
I
A
F
House
bill
476,
as
amended
by
house
committee,
sub
1
passes
with
favorable
expression
same
should
on
the
house
floor
next
up
for
discussion
only
we
have
house
bill
211
and,
if
you'd
like,
to
bring
those
guests
to
the
table,
if
you
have
any.
A
A
That
would
be
a
fiscal
note
on
this
bill
using
data
from
the
administrative
office
of
the
courts.
But
what
the
bill
does
is
pretty
simple.
If
you
have
someone
who
is
arrested
on
a
felony
charge
indicted
and
held
in
a
county
jail
once
that
person
is
subsequently
convicted,
we
all
know
that
post-conviction,
they
are
the
responsibility
of
the
state
pre-conviction.
They
are
the
responsibility
of
the
county
where
their
how
where
they
were
arrested.
A
J
Thank
you,
mr
meredith,
or
chairman
meredith.
I
appreciate
you
having
this
on
your
agenda
today
and-
and
I
feel
like
this
is
an
extremely
important
piece
of
legislation.
The
bill,
while
shortened
length,
has
incredibly
important
impact
on
our
local
fiscal
courts
and
county
governments.
Currently,
an
offender
waiting
trial
is
housed
in
our
jails
and
some
of
them
are
there
for
years,
not
months
or
weeks,
but
some
of
them
are
there
for
years
and
we
we
absorb
all
of
that
cost
in
our
county
budgets
by
kentucky
law.
J
When
that
a
founder
offender
is
found
guilty,
he
gets
credit
by
law
for
all
of
that
time
is
spent
in
our
jail.
So
the
state
is
deriving
that
entire
benefit,
because
he's
going
to
serve
whatever
time
if
he
gets
10
years
and
he's
been
in
my
jail
or
she's,
been
in
my
jail
two
years
and
he
gets
he
or
she
gets
credit
for
that
entire
time
and
the
department
of
corrections
reaps
that
benefit.
J
Much
like
chair,
meredith,
we're
shocked
to
learn
that
cost
seems
extreme,
but
it's
important
enough
to
say
again:
that's
79
million
dollars.
If
you
look
at
that
by
the
number
of
counties
in
120
counties,
but
the
numbers
of
them
that
have
full-time
jails,
that
that's
a
significant
impact,
not
a
great
number
for
the
state,
but
a
significant
impact
on
our
local
county
governments.
J
A
And
I
would
say,
we're
hopeful
for
a
per
diem
increase
representative
reed.
We
appreciate
euros,
work
on
that
in
the
the
house
budget
and,
and
also
would
like
to
just
just
clarify
that
these
dollars
won't
just
benefit
counties
where
there's
an
open
jail.
They
would
benefit
counties
where
there's
a
closed
jail
as
well
and
they're
contracting
with
a
jailer
in
another
county
to
house
those
inmates,
because
that's
a
cost
that
those
counties
are
outlawing,
even
if
they
don't
have
a
jail
themselves.
A
So
this
is
this
is
beneficial
to
all
of
our
120
counties.
That
incarcerate
folks
and
again
is
is
really
a
matter
of
fairness.
If
you
look
at
it,
we,
the
the
perfect
example,
is
if
someone
were
to
get
a
five-year,
felony
sentence
and
they'd
sit
in
a
county
jail
for
a
year.
That
now
becomes
a
four-year
sentence
on
the
state
side
and
so
they've
effectively
gotten
the
benefit
of
that
full
year,
and
that
happens
more
more
times
than
you
would
probably
expect.
C
Sure
has
the
department
of
corrections,
given
you
all
any
indication
as
to
why
they
won't
share
their
data
with
you.
A
We
had
staff
request
the
data
before
session,
our
our
staff
budget
staff.
They
have
not
sent
anything
over
and
then
the
staff
from
a
r
who
and
budget
review
who
produces.
These
documents
have
been
asking
for
that
data
on
this
bill,
as
well
as
other
bills
and
have
gotten
no
reply
at
this
point
in
time
is
my
understanding.
C
C
You
know
madison
county
population
hundred
thousand.
It's
killed
him
rock
castle
county
population.
Sixteen
thousand
it's
killed.
So
thank
you
all
for
for
bringing
this
we
at
some
point
in
time.
C
L
Yeah,
I
think
I'm
echoing
pretty
much
what's
already
been
said.
In
fact,
I
asked
to
speak
and
then
five
seconds
later,
the
gentleman
made
my
point,
but
I'm
going
to
make
it
again
anyway,
the
79
million
dollars.
If
that
is
in
fact
an
accurate
number,
then
that
is
again
79
million
dollars
that
we're
forcing
as
an
unfunded
mandate
onto
our
local
jail
system
and
it's
not
fair
to
them
and
they're
already
constrained
fiscally
they're
trying
to
find
employees.
They
can't
pay
them
the
way
they
need
to.
L
H
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
good
afternoon,
a
couple
of
questions
for
me,
so
you
have
an
issue
with
folks
that
are
incarcerated
prior
to
conviction.
So
there's
no
plan
set
up
whether
you're
there's
any
kind
of
reimbursement
from
the
state
for
holding
those
folks
in
jail
for
a
year
or.
H
H
A
After
conviction,
if
it
is
a
felony,
the
state
takes
over
that
cost
if
they
stay
in
a
county
jail
they're,
paying
the
per
diem
or
they're
sent
on
to
the
to
the
state
prison
system.
If
it's
a
misdemeanor
charge
and
they're
convicted
on
a
misdemeanor
charge,
then
those
people
continue
to
be
the
responsibility
of
the
county.
F
H
So
you
talk
about
after
a
conviction,
and
there
are
some
people
have
stayed
a
year
or
even
two
years.
Is
that?
Because
there
is
no
availability
to
move
that
person
to
a
penitentiary.
A
H
Chair
may
ask
follow-up
and
so
there's
no
compensation
from
the
state
if
that
occurs.
H
A
Does
take
care
of
that,
however,
the
credit
portion
is
all
we're
addressing
here.
So
if
the
county
has
paid
for
them
pre-conviction
and
they
get
credited
on
their
stateside
sentence
after
conviction,
then
the
state
we
believe
the
state
should
reimburse
and
that's
what
the
bill
does
for
the
time
served
that
was
credited
against
their
state
sentence.
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and,
to
the
point
the
first
question:
do
we
have
a
date
as
to
when
this
information
was
first
asked
for
from
the
administration.
I
Close
enough
look,
I'm
not
one
to
lob
bombs,
usually,
but
either
we're
trying
to
make
good
policy
here.
For
god's
sake,
this
is.
I
We
are
just
looking
for
simple
information,
so
we
can
make
good
decisions,
which
is
what
we're
all
elected
to
do,
and
I
don't
know
if,
if
it's
incompetence
or
petty
politics,
that's
keeping
this
information
away
from
us
and
you
know
neither
one's
acceptable
and
I
I'm
gonna
respectfully
ask
as
I'm
sure
others
will,
that
we
just
get
the
information
needed
so
that,
because
these
county,
jailers
and
and
and
fiscal
courts
are
bipartisan.
I
Okay,
this
shouldn't
be
a
partisan
issue.
This
should
be
a
how
we
best
going
to
utilize
our
money
and
how
much
can
we
afford
to
send
down
to
the
counties?
Because
since
I
was
on
fiscal
court
16
years
ago,
I
think
we've
had
one
bump
here
in
frankfurt
and
it
wasn't
a
very
sizable
bump
to
help
counties,
run
their
jails
and
it's
it's
past
time
and
we're
just
trying
to
make
good
decisions.
So
I
would
encourage
the
administration
to
do
what's
right
here
and
help
us
make
those
good
decisions.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and.
A
Representative,
I
don't
wish
to
point
fingers
at
anybody.
I
know
there
have
been
some
some
turnover
in
their
administrative
structure
through
the
cabinet
there
as
well,
since
this
process
started
or
just
just
before
this
process
started
and
the
reason
you're
not
seeing
a
bill
move
to
forward
with
a
vote
today
or
sometime
soon.
Right
now
is
we
want
to
get
the
numbers
right.
D
Thank
you,
chair,
lady.
This
is
the
second
committee
meeting
I've
had
today
where
we're
not
getting
any
information
from
the
cabinets.
Something's
got
to
be
done,
and
even
in
budget
we
can
get
information
can't
get
information
on
social
workers
can't
get
information
here
or
there.
It
is
getting
to
be
a
big
concern
of
mine,
and
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
representative
keaney,
for
bringing
that
up.
We
need
information
to
make
wise
and
good
policy.
Thank
you,
chair,
lady.
F
A
G
Representative
james
tipton
house,
district
53,
I
believe
my
guest
I've
got
the
same
guest.
I
believe
they've
all
been
introduced
for
the
record,
it's
good
to
be
back
before
the
local
government
committee.
Actually,
my
second
year
of
service
in
the
house,
I
served
on
the
local
government
committee,
so
I
miss
these
discussions.
G
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
introduce
you
to
house
bill
439
today.
I
filed
that
early
last
week
and
and
since
that
time
I've
had
input.
I've
had
discussion
and
I
hope
this
continued
conversation
with
local
government
committee.
Today
we
can
have
more
input
and
discussion
on
what
I
believe
is
a
very
sensitive
and
important
topic
for
our
commonwealth.
G
Just
to
give
you
a
background
why
I
pursued
this.
I
have
a
constituent
of
mine
who
actually
had
a
son
who
died
in
the
franklin
county
jail
three
years
ago.
There
were
from
all
from
the
reports.
I
don't
I'm
not
the
expert
on
this,
but
from
the
reports
this
individual
was
suffering
from
withdrawal.
Type
symptoms
did
not
get
medical
care.
The
family
came
to
me
and
said:
what
can
we
do
to
help
possibly
to
prevent
this
from
happening?
G
In
some
other
family,
so
I
reached
out
to
the
kentucky
jailers
association
actually
met
with
their
board
almost
a
year
ago,
and
we
initiated
this
conversation
about
how
we
could
increase
and
improve
training
for
deputy
jailers
across
kentucky,
and
we
have
house
bill
439
in
front
of
you.
Essentially,
every
deputy
jailer
would
be
required
to
have
80
hours
of
initial
training
during
their
first
year
of
being
hired
onto
the
job.
They
would
also
be
required
to
have
40
hours
of
continuing
education
every
year.
G
The
legislation
would
set
up
a
a
a
training
council
that
would
be
housed
in
richmond
at
the
department
of
criminal
justice
training
to
oversee
this.
There
are
reporting
requirements
in
the
bill.
There
are
suggested
topics
for
discussion,
but
I
think
now
the
the
kentucky
juggers
association
agreed
with
me.
They
want
this
training,
so
I'll
turn
it
over
to
president
daley
now
to
offer
your
input
on
this.
J
Take
after
two
or
three
times,
I'd
learn
anyway.
Thank
you,
representative
tifton,
and
thanks
to
the
board
and
chairman,
I
was
tickled
to
death
when
I
got
this
call,
because
this
has
been
a
big
issue
for
me
for
my
entire
existence,
as
relates
to
jails
and
I've
been
involved
with
them.
Since
1997
I've
been
through
both
the
bureau
of
training
and
the
state
police
academy,
and
I
think
I
realize
how
important
training
is
why
jailers
have
come
this
far.
J
E
Well,
thank
you.
A
little
bit
of
my
background
prior
to
becoming
jailer
almost
12
years
ago.
Is
I
spent
about
13
years
with
the
kentucky
state
police
as
a
dispatcher,
and
my
final
two
years
of
deployment
with
the
commonwealth
was
as
a
certified
law
enforcement
instructor
for
kentucky's
department
of
criminal
justice
training
in
richmond.
E
I
think
before
we
talk
about
where
this
bill
can
take
us,
it
would
be
important
to
discuss
how
we
relate
to
training
today.
You
know
currently
statewide.
There
are
no
standards
or
standardized
training
processes
that
we
use
in
the
commonwealth.
Most
counties
depend
on
their
own
training
staff.
They
have
an
academy
to
appropriately
train
individuals
with
their
facilities
most
commonly.
This
is
a
senior
officer
which
has
been
to
a
very
short
compact
train.
E
You
might
imagine
many
times.
This
creates
a
lot
of
inconsistency
in
our
training
for
jails
across
the
state.
Our
goal,
with
the
help
of
representative
tipton
and
with
the
formation
of
the
kentucky
jail
training
council,
is
to
standardize
that
training
statewide
and
to
further
professionalize
deputy
jailers
and
jails.
By
bringing
consistency
within
the
curriculum
that
we
utilize
for
instruction
of
the
men
and
women.
E
The
bill
would
further
mandate
that
no
less
than
80
hours
of
approved
curriculum
be
provided
to
each
new
deputy
jailer
and
no
fewer
than
40
hours
of
continuing
education.
Be
completed
each
year
thereafter,
for
many
years,
our
state's
been
nationally
recognized
at
the
top
of
our
industry,
providing
quality
training
for
the
men
and
women
of
law
enforcement.
E
The
work
of
the
kentucky
department
of
criminal
justice,
training,
louisville
and
lexington's
training
academy,
along
with
the
kentucky
state
police
academy,
have
without
question,
made
our
kentucky
peace
officers
equipped
with
the
knowledge
to
perform
their
duties
as
safely
as
possible,
while
having
the
skills
to
preserve
life
of
our
citizens.
When
that
becomes
necessary.
E
I
hope
that
we've
kind
of
summarized-
and
we
certainly
the
association,
are
in
support
of
the
creation
of
this
body,
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
hope
that
we
will
be
able
to
answer
those
for
you.
G
Mr
chair,
if
I
could
make
just
a
couple
of
additional
comments,
we
have
received
input
on
the
legislation
that
there
before
we
have
a
final
vote.
There
will
be
a
committee
substitute
to
make
some
adjustments
to
the
legislation.
One
issue
that
has
been
brought
up
is:
we
have
several
counties
in
the
state
who
have
closed
jails.
They
actually
do
not
have
jails,
their
jailers,
their
deputy
jailers.
G
Essentially,
their
role
is
transport
of
prisoners
to
a
jail
facility
back
for
court
appearances.
There
is
some
discussion
that
maybe
they
may
not
need
quite
as
much
many
hours
of
training
in
that
role
as
a
deputy,
jailer
who's
actually
in
a
facility.
So
we
are
looking
at
that.
Obviously,
we
always
look
at
cost.
The
first
day
that
I
filed
this
legislation,
I
requested
a
fiscal
note
and
a
local
impact
statement.
G
I
know
that
our
county
judges,
physical
courts
across
the
state
one
area
they
have
concern,
is,
is
what
will
the
cost
be
so
we're
waiting
for
that
to
come
back?
I
will
share
that.
The
fiscal
note
did
come
back
this
week,
mr
chairman,
like
you,
I
had
a
little
sticker
shock
on
that.
It
came
back
that
it
would
be
no
more
than
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
the
explanation
is
they
based
that
this
council
would
have
that
they
used
the
budget
for
the
kentucky
law
enforcement
council.
G
L
Johnson,
thank
you,
mr
chairman.
I
was
looking
at
the
the
40-hour
requirement
for
the
continuing
education
part
of
it.
Is
there
some
criteria
that
you
used
for
the
40
hour
number
and
the
reason
I'm
asking
is
over
and
above
any
fiscal
concerns
about
that.
I
would
be
concerned
about
literally
having
jailers
out
of
pocket
for
a
week,
given
their
already
tight
constraints
for
for
having
enough
jailers
to
work.
So
is
there
any
concern
about
that
that
issue
having
the
jailers
out
of
pocket
for
so
long
each
year,.
G
There
are
already
there
is
already
a
requirement
for
some
continuing
education.
This
does
increase
that
it
also
allows
that
the
hours
that
are
already
required
to
be
used
for
the
40
hours
and
a
in
president
daley.
Would
you
like
to
comment
on
that.
J
J
In
northern
kentucky
we
hold
academies
for
ourselves
all
the
time,
so
we
can
hold
training
in
those
areas
and
we
can
break
it
up
in
such
a
manner
that
it
may
not
even
be
40
hours
at
one
given
time
if
we
have
to
we'll
break
it
up
in
in
different
levels.
It's
that
important,
I
think,
to
us
as
jailors,
to
have
the
training
and
to
have
the
consistency
that
we
will
work
with
this
council
in
in
any
reasonable
manner
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
provide
that
training.
L
Quick
comment,
mr
chairman,
thank
you
for
that.
Thank
you
for
the
input
and
again
I'm
sure
this
is
something
you've
already
thought
about.
I
don't
think
I
just
had
a
glimpse
of
the
brilliance
there,
but
yeah.
It
is
a
little
concerning
that
that
they
would
be
out
of
pocket
for
a
week.
I'd
like
to
get
information
from
my
jailers
as
well
as
to
whether
or
not
there
is
any
issues
with
that.
L
A
And
jim,
just
as
a
matter
of
clarification,
I
think
you
you
kind
of
brought
this
up.
This
could
be
an
in-service
type.
Training
moved
around
the
state
might
not
be
an
actual
direct
housing
program
like
the
law
enforcement
program
is
but
just
to
put
in
perspective,
you
have
the
26-week
in-house
program
at
doc,
jt.
A
You
also
have
other
training
programs
for
other
other
groups
in
the
state,
and
I
may
be
wrong
when
I
say
this
and
bruce
can
correct
me,
but
even
the
volunteer
fire
departments
and
volunteer
firefighters
in
kentucky
are
required
to
get
120
hours.
Initial
certification,
I
think
unless
that
has
changed
recently
and
20
hours
annually
a
year
as
an
update
to
that,
is
that
correct,
bruce?
You
can
just
nod.
A
E
If
I
could
add,
it
doesn't
necessarily
mean
too
that
they
will
be
leaving
the
facility
for
that
training.
Much
of
our
training
is
housed
at
those
local
facilities.
Now
what
this
would
basically
do
would
create
continuity
among
approving
the
curriculum
that
was
used
to
develop
those
lesson
plans
and
would
bring
consistency.
E
It's
obviously
a
very
difficult
time
from
a
labor
standpoint
to
hire
people
right.
Now
we
put
a
lot
of
effort
and
time
into
training
those
folks
at
our
own
facilities.
We
also,
as
jim
said,
we
can
facilitate
that
training
at
regional
areas
or
neighboring
counties.
Many
of
us
have
existing
right
now,
but
if
we
can
create
this
consistency
and
a
certification
of
this
initial
80
hours,
training
as
well
as
the
continued
you
could
have
relocation
issues.
E
If
someone
moved
from
an
eastern
kentucky
jail
to
more
central
kentucky
or
western
kentucky
area,
they
would
be
certified
with
that
initial
training,
which
would
be
a
savings
to
our
county
from
a
time
perspective
as
well
as
a
cost,
and
they
would
be
immediately
able
to
go
directly
to
work
in
those
facilities.
So
it
would
almost
create
some
lateral
opportunities
of
folks
that
may
be
relocating
as
well,
but
it
is
certainly
not,
I
think,
the
intent
to
bring
people
out
of
pocket.
We
do
feel
like
that
can
be
accomplished
very
local
on-site
or
regional.
F
Thank
you.
I
do
support
the
training
and
I
think
it's
much
needed
and
I
do
have
a
comment
or
a
question
in
regards
to
as
you
develop
curriculum
if
there
is
any
opportunity
to
add
training
for
community
resources
for
that
person
to
be
more
familiar
with
that,
because
if
we're
looking
at
reducing
recidivism,
that
might
be
a
good
opportunity
for
the
deputy
jailer
to
be
able
to
provide
a
person.
F
Suggestions
and
things
they
can
do
as
far
as
workforce
training
or
anything
like
that,
because
I
know
in
my
area
you
know
it's
been
flat
out
said
when
someone
leaves
they
don't
know
whether
to
turn
right
or
left.
You
know
they're
just
basically
sent
out
the
door,
so
I
just
wanted
to
offer
that
as
a
possible
part
of
the
curriculum.
G
Rep
representative,
I'm
having
a
hard
time
getting
used
to
this
fraser
gordon.
If
you
look
at
page
six
of
the
bill
where
it
talks
about
starting
on
line
nine,
it
said
the
council
shall
establish
a
universal
core
curriculum
and
approve
training
subjects
to
be
provided
to
deputy
others
for
basic
training
continue
ed.
That
may
include,
but
are
not
limited
to,
so
the
council
would
cert.
These
are
just
suggestions,
highly
high
suggestions,
but
the
council
certainly
would
have
the
ability
to
add
a
course
subject
in
curriculum.
J
And
if
I
may,
that
that
is
a
going
issue
for
corrections
not
only
in
kentucky
but
throughout
the
united
states.
So
I
would
hope
that
we
as
a
group
are
smart
enough
to
include
that,
because
we
almost
have
to
it's
just
so
important
in
today's
environment.
A
K
No,
it's
all
right.
I
just
you
know.
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
all
for
having
us
here
for
for
both
the
bills.
Actually,
you
know
and
to
answer
your
question
about
the
re-entry
and
everything
and,
of
course,
most
jails
across
state
are
already
doing
a
re-entry
program.
Of
course,
we
we
actually
have
re-entry
council
in
hardin
county
that
helps
people.
You
know
you
know,
establish
themselves
when
they
get
out
and
before
they
get
out.
K
You
know,
so
it's
one
thing
that
a
lot
of
the
jails
have
already
stepped
up
and
have
done,
and
it's
it's
really
helping
out
a
lot
of
these
areas
with
recidivism,
and
you
know
when
you're
able
to
get
somebody
a
an
opportunity
when
they
get
out
and
stuff
they
they
stay
out.
So
that's
been
a
big
thing
across
the
jailers
association,
all
118
jailers
that
we
have
here
in
in
you
know
here
in
the
commonwealth.
K
So,
but
I
just
appreciate
y'all
having
us
here
and
you
know
it's
wild
to
think
you
know,
I
mean
we.
The
jail
association
as
a
whole
feels
appreciated
right
now
and
stuff
that
you're.
Looking
to
the
to
the
benefits
of
this,
you
know
trying
to
help
us
out.
You
know
some
of
this
stuff's
been
neglected
over
the
years
instead,
not
for
anybody's,
you
know,
fault
and
stuff,
but
it's
just
one
of
those
things
that
I
I
appreciate,
y'all
bringing
everything
up.
G
To
to
mention
the
name
of
the
young
man,
his
name
was
dylan
stratton.
His
mother
is
a
constituent
of
mine
in
anderson,
county
and
section
seven
of
the
bill
states
that
section
one
through
five.
This
act
may
be
cited
as
dylan's
law,
and
I
certainly
wanted
to
add
that
in
it's
always
a
tragedy.
I
know
we've
heard
about
the
situation
in
louisville,
representative
reed.
I
believe
larue
county
maybe
had
an
incident
recently,
so
we
want
to
try
and
prevent
these
situations
from
happening
and
feel
like
that.
G
A
Thank
you
all
very
much
for
the
presentation
staff
has
asked.
If
members
of
the
committee
would
lick
folders,
we
might
see
some
of
these
bills
again
and
we
wouldn't
have
to
hopefully
go
back
and
print
new
documents
for
them.
Representative
bentley.
I
think
you
probably
need
to
record
a
vote.
Correct,
sir
duly
noted,
seeing
no
other
business
before
the
committee,
I've
got
a
motion
to
adjourn.
Do
I
have
a
second
all
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed.
We
are
adjourned.