►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Here
without
a
quorum
we'll
just
proceed
this
morning,
we're
going
to
hear
from
representatives
from
the
AOC
and
county
jails
here
to
provide
an
update
regarding
the
virtual
hearing
technology
projects
in
Kentucky
courts,
for
which
14.7
million
was
appropriated
to
the
AOC
in
the
prior
budget,
an
additional
15
million
was
provided
in
the
current
budget,
supporting
County
jails
directly
with
costs
associated
with
implementing
video
arraignment
technology.
C
C
You,
as
all
of
you
all,
are
aware.
We
receive
funding
14.7
million
for
five
technology
projects
in
2022,
so
what
we've
done
is
break
those
down
by
project
to
give
the
idea
of
what
is
going
on
with
each
of
those
projects.
6
million
was
allocated
to
expand
video
arraignment
4.6
million
was
allocated
to
provide
the
hybrid
video
conferencing
to
date,
we've
expended
471
538
dollars
and
obligated
another
115,
000.
C
I.
Think
the
some
of
the
talking
points
here
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
communicated
was
that
we
had
planned
and
are
planning
to
purchase
for
463
courtrooms
and
72
jails,
less
the
pilots
that
have
been
up
and
running.
This
includes
Hardware
licenses,
deployment
and
installation,
as
well
as
infrastructure
updates.
C
D
And
that's
a
good
point:
I
actually
think
that's
much
harder
for
us
to
do.
We've
mower
combined
those
two
in
efforts
because
we're
moving
with
a
platform
approach
for
the
video
conferencing
and
video
arraignment
that
are
combined.
So
we
have
a
single
platform
that
will
allow
for
both
remote
participants
and
for
arraignment.
Okay,.
C
The
licenses
include
Zoom
room
and
zoom
business
user
licenses.
The
deployment
we're
actually
in
the
middle
of
interviewing
for
a
project
management
to
help
us
with
the
deployment
of
an
implementation
of
this
entire
rollout,
which
we
anticipate
starting
early
next
year
and
then
infrastructure.
There
are
some
updates
that
will
need
to
be
made
and
some
allowances
for
when
the
jail
selects
the
solution,
how
it
interfaces
with
our
hybrid
video,
arraignment
and
video
conferencing
platforms.
C
The
plan
the
plan
will
be
to
do
that
by
County.
Typically,
we
pilot
first,
which
Scott
I'll
talk
about
in
a
minute
and
we
are
in
the
middle
of
piloting
the
solution,
both
in
the
courtrooms
and
with
our
esteemed
colleague
in
Campbell
County
in
the
jail.
So
we
are
continuing
to
work
on
and
fine-tune
the
selection
of
the
solution
and
then
how
we
will
Implement
that
will
be
a
county
by
county
basis.
Thanks
you're
welcome.
D
And
I
did
want
to
mention
a
little
and
just
kind
of
speak
to
the
project
with
in
general,
with
where
we
were
and
where
we're
going
to
so.
Historically,
we
have
had
video
arraignment
for
the
courts,
and
we've
we've
had
that
for
several
years,
but
that
system
was
very
specific
to
each
Court.
It
was
a
point-to-point
solution.
So
when
we
went
to
build
one
out,
we
would
put
something
in
a
jail.
We
would
put
something
in
a
courtroom
and
then
we
would
have
a
dedicated
line
between
those
it's
very
inflexible.
It
was
complicated.
D
It
was
expensive,
but
it
allowed
that
to
happen.
So
you
know
we're
looking
now
at
this
as
kind
of
generations
for
where
we
have
versions
of
solutions
that
we
had,
and
that
was
kind
of
the
first
gen
for
us,
which
was
a
point
to
point
just
a
dedicated
solution
for
this
big
problems,
though,
to
to
add
it
to
another
County
was
very
costly.
It
was
also
there's
a
big
ownership
issue.
A
lot
of
things
were
involved.
D
The
second
gen,
which
really
came
out
out
of
the
pandemic,
which
is
when
all
of
a
sudden
we
needed
to
take
on
remote
participants
as
well,
so
we
had
a
system
that
was
designed
to
take
video
from
one
point
to
another
and
now
we're
trying
to
take
anything
on
the
internet.
In
so
with
that,
we
introduced
a
laptop
interface
that
let
judges
use
their
own
computers
to
be
able
to
tie
into
sometimes
not
always
and
I'll,
get
to
that's
part
of
the
problem,
with
Gen
2.
D
to
the
local
system,
in
the
courtrooms
to
use
remote
participants
and
for
arraignments.
So
basically,
all
they
did
at
that
point
was
call
a
jail
or
Detention
Center,
a
remote
participant.
So
you
would
have
to
join
with
your
own
equipment,
computer
laptop
iPhone,
something
and
then
they
would
go
on
the
judges
computer
and
do
the
same.
That
system
was
rushed.
That
generation,
which
was
still
what
we
mostly
have
today,
is
very
inconsistent.
It
has
problems
with
scale.
It
also
really
doesn't
cater
to
video
arraignment.
D
It
really
is
more
for
remote
participants
in
general,
so
I
think
that
there
are
a
lot
of
gaps
there
to
be
done,
but
it
does
allow
for
it
to
happen.
It
does
not
handle
well
for
Hybrid
Court
proceedings
or
for
recording
into
the
existing
court
record,
and
that's
a
big
challenge
for
us
is
getting
that
that
remote
meeting
or
the
remote
arraignment
back
into
our
court
record
and
utilizing
all
of
the
microphones
and
cameras
that
are
local
to
the
court.
So
our
third
generation,
that's
what
we're
working
on
right
now.
D
That's
what
this
is
funding
is
move
to
combine
video,
arraignment
and
remote
participants,
as
I
mentioned
earlier.
That's
a
it
is
a
platform
to
do
this
and
it
will
add
in
dedicated
video
conferencing
interface
for
us
that
allows
for
whatever
equipment
that
we
use
for
it
to
go
directly
into
our
javs
solution,
our
our
recording
Solutions
in
the
counties
and
interface
in
a
very
consistent
method.
So
one
of
the
key
things
that
we're
doing
with
this
and
and
I
think
it.
D
It
really
goes
to
adoption
and,
for
you
know,
the
ability
to
roll
this
out
quickly.
We
are
doing
Court
Readiness
in
those
locations
to
make
it
to
where
you
have
that
interface
that
we
can
then
add
in
the
solutions
with
a
very
simple
right
now
when
you
go
into
100
or
you
know,
300
courtrooms,
they're,
all
different,
every
piece
of
equipment
and
there's
different.
Every
solution
is
different.
The
layouts
are
different
and
this
is
helping
us
take
to
a
standard.
D
So
we've
got
one
solution
that
we'll
be
able
to
put
in
and
we'll
be
able
to
move
that
in
faster,
so
to
speak,
to
kind
of
the
milestones.
The
first
thing
we
really
did
was
with
research
and
development
and
that's
finding
the
right
solutions
for
it.
Finding
what
can
we
ran
into
a
lot
of
issues
with
Hardware
acquiring?
It's
just
bad
timing
for
us,
I
think
everyone
at
that
time
couldn't
really
get
Hardware
in
and
then
we
also
ran
into
the
solution
that
we
need
to
integrate
into
this
to
our
didn't
exist.
D
So
we've
had
to
work
with
vendors
to
actually
get
them
to
get
the
solutions
we
need
and-
and
we
have
that
now-
the
next
thing
that
we
we
worked
with
was
getting
a
proof
of
concept
in
and
Jim
can
hopefully
say
that.
That's
a
that's
been
a
success
for
us,
so
we've
got
the
ability
to
take
that
Hardware
that
we
had
and
get
it
actually
put
in
a
location,
and
that's
that's
very
helpful
and
that's
good
and
then
kind
of
the
the
rest
of
where
we're
going
with
this
is
was
with
court
Readiness.
D
So
that
is
taking
those
individual
systems
and
basically
distilling
them
down
to
an
interface
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
take
common
platforms
and
plug
into
without
having
to
go
into
each
one
and
figure
out
where
it's
everywhere
and
where
it
goes,
it'll
be
a
more
of
a
plug
and
play.
So
we
have
now
put
305
sites
with
the
video
conferencing
interface
installed,
so
that
gives
us
the
ability
to
start
plugging
that
in
now
Testament
to
that
we
now
have
18
sites
live.
D
Those
came
up
relatively
quickly
within
a
two-month
time
frame
that
we
would
be
able
to
take
the
equipment
plug
it
into
the
interface
and
kind
of
roll
with
it
and
the
rest
of
the
schedule.
It's
really
now
wash
and
repeat,
so
it's
getting
the
equipment
into
the
counties.
It's
going
to
be
a
scheduling
nightmare.
It
always
is,
and.
D
Then
it
is
working
a
lot
with
the
gel
side
of
the
house,
the
detention
centers
and
the
jails
to
make
sure
that
we
have
compatibility
with
any
system
that
they
deploy
and
we
can
make
that
work.
That
I
think
you
know.
That's
a
big
question
mark
for
us
until
we
have
an
exact
solution
to
to
build
the
compatibility
out
with
that's
that's
a
big
wild
card
for
us.
A
Can
I
interject
here
for
a
second
now?
Is
this?
This
looks
like
a
solution.
That's
just
for
Kentucky.
Have
you
looked
at
other
state
or
other
states
doing
their
own
thing
or
are
they
using
the
same
vendors
same
Hardware.
D
We've
looked
at
several
different
and
it's
it's
really
all
over
the
board.
Whenever
we're,
comparing
our
courts
to
others
for
one
we're
unified
court
system
instead
of
a
county
or
a
you,
know,
a
single
location,
and
they
that
does
scale
things
different
so
again
we're
looking
for
something
that
worked
in
120
counties
in
every
single
courtroom,
while
a
lot
of
those
they're
very
special
built,
so
we
kind
of
had
to
roll
those
out.
We
were
looking
more
at
locations
that
we're
doing
at
this
level.
D
D
We
have
to
keep
our
recording
local
to
the
it's
a
quartz
at
this
point.
So
yes,
we
have
looked
at
several
Zoom
is
have
become
a
very
common
platform
for
this
in
the
room
approach
makes
sense,
but
for
us
it's
that
integration
into
the
local
rooms
that
are
into
the
local
courtrooms
that
made
it
challenging.
A
Now,
what
what
would
the
hybrid
video
look
like
it
would
be
used
for?
Would
it
be
used
for
trials?
A
Would
it
be
used
for
like
motion
hearings,
that
sort
of
thing,
or
would
it
also
be
used
for
attorney-client
conferences,
because
the
the
confidentiality
issues
involved
in
that
are
different
than
just
having
it
for
a
full-blown
public
trial?
Is
that
are
you
looking
at
the
confidentiality
aspects
of
it.
C
You
know
absolutely
with
every
Court
proceeding.
There
are
different
requirements,
so
part
of
that
is
the
confidentiality
of
when
the
attorney
speaks
with
the
the
client
and
zoom
allows
for
breakout
rooms
that
have
the
ability
to
keep
that
particular
conversation
confidential
and
those
would
not
be
recorded.
E
I
would
just
add
that
at
least
from
Jim
Davis
perspective,
I
think
this
is
extremely
exciting
from
the
Jail's
perspective,
we're
we're
dealing
with
72
different
personalities,
72
different
facilities.
So
it's
a
job.
Mr,
Renee
and
I
are
looking
at
a
couple
of
different
vendors
and
we're
working
to
get
systems
that
will
integrate
with
the
court
system
hopefully
flawlessly,
but
also
that
will
do
you
know
we
have
a
multitude
of
hearings
that
we
do
great
example.
During
the
pandemic,
I
was
doing
hearings
for
Pendleton
County
Robertson
County
Nicholas
County
people
across
the
state.
E
So
it's
a
great
savings.
If
we
can
do
it
and
do
it
correctly
not
to
have
to
transport
people
from
Campbell
County
to
Paducah
for
a
15-minute
hearing-
and
you
know
that
some
of
some
of
my
brethren
don't
like
the
idea
of
spending
their
time
and
money.
My
perspective
again,
my
perspective
alone
at
this
point
in
time,
because
I
have
to
work
this
program
and
sell
it
for
the
jailers
completely.
E
Is
that
you
know
it's
Fiscal
Court
money,
so
it's
a
savings
across
the
board,
whether
I'm
doing
the
transport
or
whether
the
sheriff's
doing
the
transport.
But
this
this
entire
program
and
and
we've
been
working.
He
came
down
and
gave
us
a
Spiel
for
the
jailers
and
you
know
I'm
the
Old
Goat,
so
I
heard
right
right
right
right
right
then
I
have
to
go
to
somebody
afterwards
and
have
it
all
explained
to
me
again
so
I
know
what
they're
saying,
but
it's
extremely
exciting.
E
We
also
want
a
program
that
will
do
other
things
inside
of
the
jail.
So
that's
part
of
the
issue
for
us
is
finding
a
system
that
will
integrate
completely
with
the
court
system
and
do
some
of
the
other
things
inside
of
a
jail
that
we
need
to
have
done.
So
it's
again,
I
guess,
from
my
perspective,
we're
working
with
Jason.
If
you
look
at
the
picture,
that's
up
there
now,
that's
my
jail,
that's
Judge,
Blau
and
and
of
course
he
is
a
die-hard
computer
person
and
loves
this
stuff.
But
it's
it's
working
great
for
us.
F
The
future
of
this
technology
as
far
as
trials
I
know
you
could
get
in
some
constitutional
issues
with
remote
testimony.
Do
you
all
envision
a
day
that
maybe
that
that
is
allowed
and
I
know
that
might
require
a
constitutional
amendment
but
I
as
a
technology
advances
I,
maybe
see
the
need
for
that
in
the
future.
C
I
think
that
that
is
certainly
something
that
is
coming
down
the
road
I
think
as
the
technology
changes.
So
too,
we
will
change.
I,
think
that,
in
speaking
yesterday,
with
some
of
the
district
judges,
I
think
that
you
know
the
evolution
of
technology
is
so
fast
that
by
the
time
we
pick
this
solution
and
implement
it
it'll
be
time
to
do
another.
So
I
think
as
the
technology
changes
and
allows
for
different
things.
I
think,
certainly
looking
at
how
we
do
what
we
do
will
be
something
that
happens
as
well.
A
Now,
on
this
timeline
again
real
quickly,
you've
looks
like
you've
spent
about
a
half
a
million
and
they
have
obligations
of
a
115
000,
but
we're
talking
about
an
11,
almost
an
11
million
dollar
project.
How
realistic
is
it
that
you're
gonna
get
this
done?
Let's
say
in
the
first
quarter
of
next
year,
so.
C
If
you'll
look
at
the
slide
above
I
think
we'll
begin,
the
rollout
in
2023
I
don't
think
we'll
complete
it
until
2025..
So
it
takes
us
a
couple
of
years
to
get
to
every
single
county
in
the
state,
and
we've
done
this
repeatedly
with
other
Technology
Solutions.
So
we
have
a
pretty
good
understanding
of
what
it's
going
to
take
to
to
roll
it
out.
Statewide.
C
D
D
That
is
more
of
a
solution
that
would
belong
in
the
gel.
That's
everything
together,
so
the
courtroom
itself
holds
the
rest
of
that.
We
already
have
a
TV
for
display.
You
have
video
cameras,
you
have
mics
already
involved.
This
is
putting
that
whole
system
into
a
portable
unit
that
can
be
used
for
it,
but
the
you
can
see
the
touch
screen
very
much
the
same,
so
the
interface
and
the
idea
set
behind
it
is
now.
C
D
County
18
we
have
18
courtrooms,
okay
and
actually
I
think
we
have
19
courtrooms
as
of
today.
So
sorry,
we
we
did
finish
one
since
when
we
prepared
the
materials
but
I
would
say
from
a
feedback
perspective.
What
we've
received
from
it
has
been.
You
know
well,
I,
think
in
any
pilot
and
proof
of
concept,
we
got
things
that
we
missed.
D
We've
got
things
that
are
better
current
I
think
we
have
really
good
feedback,
but
there
is
some
confusion
because
we
still
have
that
second
generation,
which
was
kind
of
all
over
the
board.
So
there's
a
lot
of
people
who
feel
that
they're
interacting
with
this
solution
when
they're,
really
not
it
may
look
the
same,
because
the
cut
judge
could
use
zoom,
they
can
do
the
same
meeting
on
it.
We
can
even
have
it
facilitated
to
where
it's
going
to
be
very
similar
to
this.
C
I
think
that
we
live
in
a
hybrid
world
where
we're
supporting
you
know
the
second
generation
solution,
while
we're
transitioning
to
the
third
generation
solution.
So
it's
it's
something
we
do
every
day,
but
it
is
a
transition
and
helping
people
understand
well
you're
still
here,
but
we're
all
going
to
be
here
at
some
point.
Yeah.
A
Yeah,
well,
we
appreciate
you
reaching
out
to
us
I
think
you
should
you
need
to
reach
out
to
to
them
as
well
to
explain
the
progress
you're
making
in
this.
So
any
other
questions,
Senator
McDaniel.
G
Hey,
thank
you
Mr
chairman.
Would
you
walk
me
through
that?
Those
icons
that
the
the
judge
has
in
front
of
him.
G
D
So
there's
a
join
and
so
and
the
screens
have
changed
slightly
from
it,
but
the
concepts
are
still
the
same,
but
basically
this
is
to
think
of
a
well
it's
a
video
phone
is
is
kind
of
the
way
that
it's
thought
of
so
you
could
make
a
call
directly
to
location,
for
example,
in
the
list
that
shows
Campbell
County
Detention
Center
room
one.
If
you
were
to
click
on
that
and
say
dial,
it
will
ring
it
like
a
phone.
D
So
it's
that
simple
just
point
to
you
know
in
to
be
able
to
to
do
that,
but
the
key.
This
is
setting
up
more
as
meetings,
so
you
say:
no
one's
invited
meet
now.
I
can
either
create
a
ad
hoc
meeting
on
the
device
or
you
schedule
the
room
in
just
as
a
resource.
So
when
we
set
these
any
of
the
proceedings
up,
you
invite
either
the
Detention
Center
or
the
courtroom
or
wherever
as
the
room
it
shows
up
on
here,
you
hit
join
at
that
point.
D
D
C
Think
that
we
have
set
in
motion
a
program
for
judicial
support,
Specialists
to
be
trained
in
remote
Court
proceedings,
and
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
they
can
facilitate.
Some
of
the
judges
prefer
to
facilitate
themselves,
so
we
want
a
solution
that
allows
for
both.
So
we
think
this
does
that,
but.
G
C
E
G
F
Excuse
me
I'm,
sorry,
so
will
this
create
opportunities
for
like
for
AOC
to
for
quality
control,
to
monitor
certain
interactions
as
they're
taking
place?
Is
there
a
mechanism
to
do
that?
Would
it
be
proper
for
that
to
happen?
The.
C
Video
record
is
currently
the
official
record
of
the
court,
so
those
video
they
exist
already,
but.
D
So
we
we
do
have
the
ability
to
do
monitoring
as
far
as
quality
and
what
is
being
done,
but
the
content
to
look
inside
of
the
content.
We
do
not
do
that
remotely
and
we
do
not
have
that
ability.
The
content
would
only
be
done
from
the
current
same
system
that
they
have
today
that
on-site
Personnel
can
review
that
and
maintain.
H
Mr,
chair
and
and
thank
you
all
for
the
work
that
you've
done
so
far
on
this
project.
I
know
it
seems
like
it
might
not
end
anytime
soon,
but
I
know
you're
thinking
about
this
in
the
right
way.
You
have
done
a
really
good
job
of
identifying
a
lot
of
the
stakeholders
in
this.
Obviously,
you've
brought
the
judges
in
because
they're
going
to
be
operating
a
lot
of
the
equipment.
Obviously,
the
jails
are
very
important.
My
question
is
about
other
stakeholders
and
other
users
of
of
this
technology
I'm.
H
Looking
at
our
public
defenders
here,
our
prosecutors,
the
private
bar,
is
also
going
to
be
very
important
for
individuals
who
are
represented
by
by
private
Council,
whether
that's
criminal
or
civil.
H
Are
there
plans
for
trainings
on
you
know.
This
shift
to
you
know,
I.
Think
a
lot
of
people
want
to
shift
to
this
technology,
but
they
in
order
for
it
to
be
efficient.
Everyone
has
to
use
it
and
use
it
well
and
feel
like
they
are
using
it
within
the
the
confines
of
you
know
their
ethical
responsibilities
to
their
client,
because
we've
all
you
know
been
on
that
Zoom,
where
someone
has
not
been
on
mute
or
said
something
or
done
something
that
they
did
not
intend
to.
H
C
I
think
that's
an
excellent
question.
I
think
training
is
always
a
big
piece
of
any
implementation
that
certainly
something
we'll
be
looking
into
as
well
there
as
you
plan
the
Statewide
rollout
Pilots,
you
kind
of
learn
right.
You
learn
from
your
pilot
and
then
you
develop
the
implementation
plan,
which
a
part
of
that
would
include
communication
as
well
as
training,
so
I
think
that's
something
that
we'll
be
looking
at,
how
to
fine-tune
that
and
make
sure
we've
been
engaged
and
notified
all
stakeholders.
So
that's
something
we'll
be
looking
at
as
well.
Thank
you.
C
A
Sir
I
suppose
that
needs
to
because
people
do
represent
themselves
on
occasion
is
that
the
same
project
completion
it
looks
like
it's
an
earlier
December
of
yes.
C
C
Mean
it
is,
it
is
actually
and-
and
that
was
a
great
transition.
Thank
you
Mr
chairman,
so
the
self-represented
litigant
portal
was
one
of
the
five
projects
we
actually
are
moving
very
quickly
in
this
project
we
are
looking
at.
There
have
actually
been
10
initial
guided
interviews
created,
which
means
a
self-represented
litigant
can
go
online
and
actually
complete
paperwork
to
initiate
Court
proceedings
are.
C
It's
mostly,
though,
the
the
domestic
and
we're
expanding
the
pro
se
divorce
forms.
So
those
are
on
the
the
table
as
well.
The
Fayette
County
legal
help
center
was
launched
earlier
this
summer
and
on
Thursdays
they
have
as
many
as
10
to
20
people
in
that
in
that
facility,
working
with
volunteer
attorneys
to
complete
paperwork
online.
So
it's
it's
hit
the
ground
running.
I.
C
Think
some
of
the
things
we're
looking
at
is
expanding
those
and
also
looking
at
how
do
we
Implement
a
public
workstation
for
folks
to
actually
sit
down
and
complete
those
forms,
so
we'll
be
launching
a
public
workstation
pilot
in
Fayette
County
in
the
very
near
future,
and
then
working
with
the
circuit
court
clerks
to
Define
and
provide
additional
srl
support
services
so
that
you
know
these
folks
can
go
and
and
and
do
this
work
but
be
supported
as
they
do
it.
So
we
estimate
a
completion
to
your
point.
Mr
chairman
in
December
of
2023.
I
Your
comments
about
the
workstations
and
pro
se
and
the
way
I
interpret
that
and
I'm
not
real
familiar
with
that
area
the
courts,
but
that
make
more
user
friendly,
which,
on
its
surface,
seems
like
it
would
be
a
good
thing
but
I'm
concerned
about
you
know.
We
live
in
a
very
litigious
Society
where
things
that
were
one
time
settled
over
the
backyard
fence
are
now
protracted
court
cases.
I
Some
people
would
say
unfortunate,
clogging
up
the
courts,
making
minor
things
major
and
really
it's
not
what
the
courts
or
what
our
Founders
originally
set
the
courts
up
for
so
I.
One
of
my
concerns
is,
as
you
explain,
some
of
what
you
just
talked
about
is
that
that
might
be
encouraging
that
and
if
it
is
encouraging
it
I,
don't
think
that
over
the
long
term,
that's
a
good
thing.
C
So,
thank
you
for
your
comments.
I
think
that
you
know
the
the
intent
is
to
provide
the
people
who
are
unable
to
secure.
You
know
an
attorney
to
be
able
to
do
some
of
the
very
basic
things
that
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
do
whether
it's
you
know
to
file
for
a
divorce,
so
I
think
that
that
I
don't
think
that
it
creates
an
undue
burden
on
the
court.
C
C
Although
the
clerks
are
clamoring
for
these
guided
interviews,
we've
actually
posted
them
to
our
website,
so
those
are
available
to
go
out
and
and
look
at
those
you
can
see
the
the
legal
help
forms
section
down
at
the
bottom
there
so
of
the
petition
for
protective
order,
expungement
of
a
misdemeanor
or
traffic
offense
motion
to
wave
costs
them
fees,
small
claims,
Etc,
so
I
think
the
long-term
vision
is
to
empower
folks
to
do
things
that
they
that
they
need
to
be
able
to
do
so.
That's
our
goal.
C
Have
looked
at
other
states
in
portals,
and
this
this
actually
is,
is
a
free
application
that
allows
us
to
set
up
these
interviews
online.
We're
working
extensively
with
our
the
office
of
general
counsel
to
make
sure
that
we
are
abiding
by
any
legal
requirements
that
we
need
to
have
included.
But
this
application
is
used
by
other
states
as
well.
So
we
are
very
confident
in
the
use
of
the
the
technology.
A
C
C
So
redaction
software,
as
I'm
sure
most
of
you
are
aware,
allows
us
the
ability
to
hide
or
redact
personal
identifiable
information.
So,
as
you
know,
most
of
the
documents
that
reach
the
court
do
have
some
of
that
information
so
being
able
to
protect.
That,
certainly
is
of
Paramount
concern
to
the
court,
as
well
as
to
the
public,
particularly
with
all
the
security
issues,
particularly
with
all
the
security
breaches
that
we've
seen
over
the
course
of
the
last
couple
years
and
the
sophistication
of
the
folks
who
are
able
now
to
infiltrate
systems.
C
So
we
want
to
make
sure
our
data
is
secure
and
protected.
The
use
of
a
software
like
this
will
allow
us
to
do
that
even
more.
So
we
are
in
the
beginning
stages
of
this
project.
We
have
purchased
redaction
software,
we
will
be
launching
a
proof
of
concept
and
we
have
hired
a
redaction
administrator
someone
to
help
us
oversee
and
administer
the
software
and
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
with
this
particular
project.
C
With
all
of
these
projects,
we
have
a
committee
of
folks
that
work
with
us,
both
stakeholders
and
AOC
Personnel,
so
in
in
trying
to
outreach
to
all
those
people
who
would
be
affected,
we're
doing
that
with
a
governing
body.
A
committee,
if
you
will
the
estimated
project
completion
on
this
one,
as
you
can
see
in
the
timeline
is
December
of
2024.
C
A
Well,
it
just
seems
to
me
that
this
should
be
a
priority
if,
if
we're
going,
people
are
going
online
and
putting
their
own
personal
information
on
there
without
any
security
software
in
there
I
I
would
think
this
should
be.
First
honestly,.
C
It
absolutely,
and
if
you
think,
of
all
these
project,
projects
are
running
in
parallel,
I
mean
we
have
all
these
projects
running
in
parallel.
It
is
a
priority,
I
think,
as
we
step
into
the
electronic
record,
it
becomes
more
of
a
priority.
So
we
understand
that
this
is
something
that
needs
to
be
done
and
we're
working.
You
know
as
quickly
as
possible
to
ensure
that
it's
complete
in
a
timely
manner
before
we
move
to
a
more
electronic
record.
C
Yes,
this
is
to
expand
what
we
refer
to
as
ePay,
which
is
our
online
service
for
payment
of
fines
and
costs,
and
what
this
particular
project
will
do
is
provide
a
payment
option
for
those
who
who
may
seek
a
different
payment
option.
They
don't
want
to
go
online.
They
want
to
go
to
the
courthouse.
Our
plan
is
to
put
kiosks
into
12
of
the
largest
courthouses
and
see
how
this
works.
C
C
A
So
this
is
cash
only
and
I.
Don't
think
anybody
carries
cash
anymore.
Is
there
any
thought
about
car
credit
cards
So.
C
Currently
they
can
pay
online
with
credit
card,
so
we
have
found
that
that
has
increased
our
traffic
flow
considerably
as
we
expanded
our
ePay
option.
This
is
just
to
provide
an
additional
option
for
those
folks
who
do
carry
cash.
Who
may
want
not
to
stand
in
line
at
the
clerk's
office
to
to
make
payment
on
a
on
a
traffic.
Fine
and
I.
Think
the
real,
exciting
thing
here
is
the
option
for
the
convenience
stores
and
the
ability
to
go
into
a
convenience,
store
and
pay
that
money.
C
A
F
Carroll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
security
of
these
machines.
How
often
are
they
emptied
potential
for
burglaries
and
snatching
the
machines?
Can
they
be
tracked
that
kind
of
thing
so.
C
We're
working
with
a
vendor
for
this
particular
project
Keith
and
they
are
actually
the
ones
who
also
operate
the
probation
and
parole
machines.
We
will
follow
and
closely
align
our
processes
and
procedures
with
what
works
for
them
and-
and
we
share
that
concern
about
emptying
those
machines.
But
those
are
that
will
all
be
handled
by
the
vendor.
A
F
Carroll
just
quickly
along
the
lines
what
Senator
schickel
was
talking
about,
so
so,
with
with
this
access
to
to
file
your
own
documents,
a
person
could
get
online
at
any
time
and
initiate
the
proceedings
for
a
divorce
correct,
correct.
So
is
there
a
waiting
period
because
I
could
see
a
lot
of
fights
one
of
the
parties
going
straight
to
the
computer
and
filing
for
the
divorce
and
the
next
day?
Well,
maybe
I
shouldn't
have
done
that
is
there?
F
Is
there
a
way
to
go
back
in
and
and
what
would
be
the
process
to
withdraw?
That
request.
C
I
would
think
that
it
would
follow
whatever
process
is
currently
in
place
to
withdraw
that
process.
This
just
uses
the
technology
to
provide
the
the
springboard,
if
you
will
for
that
process,
so
whatever
processes
are
currently
in
place
would
be
followed.
The
same
way
with
an
online
initiation
of
that
action.
F
You
know
that
can
makes
for
some
interesting
arguments
at
home.
A
C
Yes,
thank
you
similar
to
our
ePay,
which
we
use
a
vendor
to
process
those
payments.
There
is
a
payment
fee
associated
with
that.
The
exact
fee
structure,
I
think,
is
being
determined
with
with
the
vendor
as
well,
but
there
will
be
a
nominal
payment
fee
associated
with
that
as
a
convenience
fee.
F
Sorry,
questions
just
keep
popping
up
in
my
head,
so
so,
overall,
with
with
all
the
things
that
you
are
doing,
what
is
the
overall
goal,
the
ultimate
goal
in
the
making
the
system
more
efficient?
What
what
do
you
envision
once
all
these
things
are
up
and
going?
How
much
time
is
there
any
way
to
really
estimate
how
much
time
the
courts
will
save
with
all
these
things
combined
jails,
the
cost
of
transporting
is:
is
there
any
dollar
figure
attached
to
all
these
different
initiatives?
I.
C
Think
that's
a
great
question
and
I
think
as
we
look
at
defining
measurements
of
success
in
these
projects.
That's
certainly
something
that
we
need
to
also
capture
is
how,
in
the
end,
is
this
truly
saving
time
and
money.
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
that
we
always
think
about
is
service
right
service
to
our
customers.
F
I
think
they're
great
ideas,
I,
you
know,
and
I
I'm,
assuming
other
states
in
some
areas
are
much
further
ahead
than
we
are
so
sure
there
is
some
basis
to
look
at
to
to
make
predictions,
but
this
pretty
exciting
stuff
and
I'm
sure
the
the
courts
and
the
the
jails
with
all
this
happening
at
one
time.
It's
it's
going
to
be
a
learning
curve,
I'm
certain,
but
should
should
have
big
savings
in
time
and
money.
So
good
efforts.
A
Thank
you
Senator
before
we
adjourn
entertain
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
of
the
August
17th
meeting.
I
A
Second,
all
all
in
favor
all
opposed
the
minutes
are
adopted.
I
want
to
thank
our
panel
today
very
interesting
and
important
discussion
that
we're
having
I'm
sure
those
who
of
us
who
are
left
on
this
panel
in
regular
session
will
probably
want
an
update
on
on
the
progress.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
C
A
No
other
business
motion
to
adjourn.