►
From YouTube: Cataloging Special Interest Group - 12/1/2022
Description
00:00:00 - Start
00:14:30 Heather (she/her): https://koha-community.org/
00:15:06 Heather (she/her): https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32325
00:15:36 Liz Dukelow: oooo
00:25:11 Liz Dukelow: 999 c?
00:25:25 Liz Dukelow: Good to know!!
00:27:41 Heather (she/her): https://demo.koha-us.org/cgi-bin/koha/opac-MARCdetail.pl?biblionumber=431
00:32:14 Heather (she/her): heather_hernandez@nps.gov
00:34:12 Liz Dukelow: yes!
00:35:38 Jason: records_batchdel
00:38:37 Heather (she/her): https://koha-community.org/manual/21.11/en/html/patrons.html?highlight=records_batchdel
00:43:28 Jason: https://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/JQuery_Library#Add_clear_and_preset_permission_buttons.2C_and_a_copy_button_to_user_permissions_page_.28v20.x.29
00:43:42 Heather (she/her): Coooooool, Jason!!
00:49:51 Liz Dukelow: That would be so beautifu;
00:50:15 Liz Dukelow: Party hats
00:52:00 Liz Dukelow: }: 3c
00:52:14 Jason: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32275
00:53:02 Liz Dukelow: nice launching point
00:53:24 Jason: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31742
00:54:28 Liz Dukelow: Nice!
00:55:04 Liz Dukelow: AHHHHHHH
00:55:14 Liz Dukelow: THATS ADORABLE
00:59:14 Fred King: Idea for a Koha presentation: basic RDA for the Koha user
01:06:17 Heather (she/her): https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=26482
01:06:42 Liz Dukelow: The thing that does exactly what I want it to!-name choice
01:07:07 Liz Dukelow: LOL
01:08:44 Liz Dukelow: oooo!!!
01:09:15 Liz Dukelow: YES is so cold
01:09:24 Fred King: Joyous winter holiday of your choice!
01:09:27 Margaret Brown: Happy holidays to you, too!
01:09:34 Liz Dukelow: Happy holidays everyone!!
01:09:38 Aly Rattler: Thank you, Heather! Thanks everyone! Happy Holidays!
A
This
we
this
month,
I
have
a
couple
of
things:
I
wanted
to
point
out,
I'm,
putting
a
link
to
the
main
koha
Community
website
in
the
chat
and
I'm,
encouraging
everyone
to
go
there
and
scroll
down
to
the
latest
newsletter,
which
has
links
to
the
latest
releases
of
koha
and
the
release,
notes
and
really
take
a
look
at
the
latest
releases.
There
are
a
lot
of
really
cool
things
for
cataloging
coming
and
they're.
Just
too
many
to
point
out,
I
mean
it's.
A
These
new
releases
are
really
exciting
and
I'm
also
putting
a
link
to
a
bug.
Bug
number
three:
two:
three
two
five
filed
by
Andrew,
a
lot
of
us
know
Andrew
and
it
is
a
detailed
bug
having
to
do
with
006
fields
and
008
Fields.
So
I'm
encouraging
everybody
who'd
like
to
think
about
some
fixed
Fields,
And
format,
matting
to
go.
Take
a
look
and
put
your
thinking,
cap
on
and
yeah.
Let's,
let's
comment
on
that.
One.
B
A
C
B
As
part
of
one
of
our
subscriptions
actually,
two
of
them
access,
medicine
and
access
surgery
we're
getting
a
whole
lot
of
videos
which
I
belatedly
realized
these
they're.
Not
really
they
shouldn't
be
cataloged
with
the
item
type
ebook.
They
should
have
their
own
gold
video,
but
they
come
from
oclc
World
share,
I
think
in
huge
batches.
B
B
B
A
B
D
B
A
When
it,
when
it
comes
to
item
marker
trying
to
Overlay
item
records,
is,
is
an
Undiscovered
Country.
For
me,
what
I
tend
to
do
is
use
the
batch
item
modification
and
then
you
know
if,
if
I
want
to
do
alterations
on
the
bib
records,
I've
had
success.
You
know
grabbing
that
batch,
taking
them
out
doing
the
modification
and
then
bringing
them
back
into
Coho
overlaying
on
the
999
subfield
C,
but
it
doesn't
mean
it's
impossible.
A
B
E
With
the
item
type
project,
I've
discovered
the
bibliographic
record.
I
can
change
a
mark
edit
and
upload,
and
all
is
golden
the
I.
It
just
does
it
it's
like
it
ignores
it.
Even
though
I
don't
I
tell
it
not
to,
though
what
I
have
the
problem
of
is:
I
have
a
lot
of
items
that
don't
have
barcodes,
and
so
it
will
duplicate.
I
now
have
two
items
with
no
barcodes
when
I
import
it
back
in
instead
of
one
item
with
no
barcode,
and
so
it's
like
just
ignore
it.
F
B
A
E
D
A
B
A
A
A
Yes,
a
999
instead
field
C
will
have
a
record
number
that
you
will
notice
matches
the
record
number
in
the
URL
that
stable
URL.
So
that's
another
place
where
you
can
quickly
see
the
the
koha
assigned
record
number
in
a
9997
PLC
for
a
record
is
just
look
at
the
URL
for
the
record,
while
you're
looking
at
it
in
that
little
record
number.
That
should
be
the
same.
F
B
B
D
A
F
B
And
to
make
things
more,
confusing
I
was,
if
you
want
to
delete
a
whole
batch
of
stuff,
just
put
it
in
a
cart
and
then
do
batch
delete,
which
works
really
well
most
of
the
time.
But
then
you
can
make
a
list
which
is
out
of
bib
numbers.
Put
it
into
the
cart
batch,
delete
that,
because
you
can't
batch
delete
from
a
list
as
far
as
I
know,
but
they
seem
to
call
each
record
in
the
cart
or
in
the
list,
an
item
which
is
which
is
kind
of
confusing.
B
E
D
E
B
D
C
A
B
A
We'll
mention
one
other
thing
that
I
forgot
to
mention
at
the
top
tomorrow:
December
2nd
is
a
patch
session
for
bug,
testing
and
patching,
and
it
the
information
on
it
was
posted
to
The,
Coho
US
list
and
the
koha
list,
and
if
anybody
would
like
the
information
on
that,
it's
drop
in
drop
out,
watch
participate.
People
will
be
there
who
are
helpful.
A
A
B
D
B
B
C
E
To
be
helpful,
I
had
to
I
had
a
library
that
wasn't
in
our
live
site.
They
just
it
was
kind
of
like
using
it
so
I
needed.
We
were
going
to
remove
it,
so
we
could
import
the
new
one
in
they
had
hundreds
of
records
that
were
still
checked
out,
so
it
wouldn't.
Let
me
delete,
and
so
I'm,
like
checking
all
of
the
men
I
could
have
done
this
in
one
step,
though
I
felt
like
this
is
a
new.
E
B
I,
don't
remember,
I,
don't
remember
how
I
discovered
that
I,
just
I
was
thinking
of
the
R2
or
a
lot
of
those
get
archived
too
so
I
have
to
take
them
out
of
the
catalog
and
it's
a
lot
easier
just
to
search
by
something
add
to
cart.
Instead
of
going
into,
let's
say,
50
records,
They
decided
aren't
available
anymore.
E
D
A
This
is
in
the
manual
and
the
other
thing
that
I
will
take
this
opportunity
to
say
is:
if
you
find
the
manual
lacking
and
you
figure
things
out,
anybody
can
contribute
to
the
manual
and
it's
pretty
easy.
I've
done
it
I
think
one
of
the
simplest
ways
to
do
it
is
to
either
you
can
just
post
to
the
main
koha
email
list.
Saying:
hey
I'd
like
something
like
this
added
to
the
manual
and
one
of
the
friendly
people
will
either
help
you
do
it
or
do
it.
A
C
D
C
Have
to
be
checked
in
before
you
can,
but
let
me
I
can
show
the
permission
screen
I
think
yeah
it
does.
It
deletes
and
holds
so.
This
is
my
test.
Patron
and
my
permissions
are
funky.
Okay,
so
I've
been
putting
little
icons
and
things
but
yeah.
If
you
go
to
more
and
then
set
permissions
and
then
it's
wanna,
it's
under
okay
and
then
Records
batch
deletion
and
I've
got
a
little
lock
on
mine,
because
I
did
have
an
incident
where
we
some
bad
things
happen.
C
But
if
you
have
super
librarian
functions,
then
of
course
you
have
all
the
check
boxes
so
make
sure
you
don't
have
anybody
with
that
one
and
then,
like
I
was
saying
on
it.
Won't
let
you
check
the
box.
If
it's
checked
out
so
I've
got
this
one
checked
out,
you
can
see
so
it
won't
get
it
won't.
Let
me.
B
C
B
E
C
C
I
do
have
those
I
have
like
preset
buttons
and
that's
in
the
wiki
I
can
find
the
code.
For
that.
That's
been
the
most
helpful
for
me
so
like
there's
that
batch
permission
thing
that
I
don't
use
and
but
I
do
have
these
buttons,
where
you
can
set
and
copy
to
other
accounts
and
that's
something
that
Christopher
Brandon
wrote.
C
E
I
have
a
question:
that's
cataloging
slash
Consortium
related,
so
we
have
certain
journals
that,
like
everybody,
owns
and
has
in
their
Library
and
when
I
use
the
fields
for
a
journal
that,
like
is
linked
to
a
preceding
and
a
sauce
seeding.
I
use
the
fields,
but
when
you
click
on
it,
it
just
does
a
title.
Search
and
I
want
to
link
it
to
my
library's
preceding
and
my
light
like
I.
Don't
want
it
to
show
everybody's
I
want
it
to
just
show
my
library.
A
Okay,
that
that's
really
that's
really
fancy,
and
that
is
really
really
good
to
know,
because
I
am
going
to
work
on
a
bug
for
the
linking
entry
Fields.
They
the
bugs
and
the
patches
have
been
piecemeal
for
like
this
one
particular
linking
entry
field
that
particular
linking
entry
field.
Some
libraries
wanted
on
the
title.
Some
libraries
don't
like
I
do
not
want
my
linking
entry
field
linking
on
a
title
of
annual
report
or
ship
register
in
my
library.
A
A
That
is
really
good
information.
This
is
a
it's.
It's
gonna,
be
a
big
big,
detailed
bug
and
I'm
going
to
take
my
time.
Writing
it
as
thoroughly
as
I
can
and
I'm
gonna
totally
bring
it
to
the
group
for
your
all
y'all's
eyes
on
it
and
I
want
to
thoroughly
search
bugzilla
too,
to
mention
the
previous
bugs
that
this
is
done,
because
I'm
I'm
in
a
selfish,
selfish
position.
With
this,
we
have
a
lot
of
custom
xslt
to
achieve
our
linking
and
every
single
time
we
upgrade
one
of
the
linking
entry
field.
A
D
A
E
All
right,
yeah
I
have
a
colleague
in
Germany
that
I
work
with
that's
wanting
to
use
all
the
linking
fields
and
she's
like
but
I,
don't
know
if
kohai
uses
it
and
I'm
like
well.
I've
heard
people
make
it
work,
but
they're
supported
didn't
realize
that
was
a
yeah.
They
wrote
extra
code
to
make
that
work
and.
A
And
there
is
code
in
the
community
version
for
certain
of
the
fields,
but
it's
again
it's
been
a
piecemeal
approach
and
then
I'm
also
going
to
ask
some
real
Mark
data
experts
and
bid
frame,
aware
data
experts
like
Joy
Nelson,
to
perhaps
set
some
eyes
on
my
draft
and
get
this
as
well
written
as
I
can
and
get
it
into
bugzilla
so
that
we
can.
We
can
try
to
get
this
working.
E
E
A
Right
we
can
make
it
happen
right
and
it.
This
is
the
sort
of
thing
that
really
needs
the
community
participation,
because,
when
I
write,
the
bug
I'm
an
oclc
user
I'm,
going
to
write
it
for
the
needs
of
records
that
have
an
oclc
number
in
the
001
and
how
they've
changed
over
time
and
also
have
oclc
numbers
and
Library
of
Congress
numbers
in
the
subfield
W
of
the
76x
through
78x
field,
and
they
might
have
multiple
record
numbers
and
I
want
the
link
on
the
last
one.
And
so
how
do
we
then
design
with
proper?
A
B
Advertising
thing
touting
all
the
wonderful
things
their
particular
service.
Does
it's
another
ILS
and
said,
for
example,
does
your
software
let
you
set
up
a
separate
page
for
each
department
and
I
said
yeah?
Of
course
it
does.
Co
is
infinitely
configurable
I
just
set
it
up
as
a
different
branch
and
I
said
this
to
just
my
colleagues,
not
to
the
company
and
I
said
continued
well
and
if
co-ed
doesn't
do
something
they
really
want.
F
C
This
might
be
controversial
for
cataloging,
but
I
think
that
it
could
be
helpful
if,
at
least
in
the
basic
editor,
we
could
use
that
functionality
as
well
to
put
in
an
ISBN
and
then
pull
in
just
some
basic
data
about
the
the
item
from
the
Google
Books
API,
as
sort
of
a
starting
point
for
a
scratch
record.
We
were
able
to
do
this
before
with
Amazon.
We
could
like
put
in
an
ISBN
and
it
would
spit
out
a
a
marked
record.
Just
Bare
Bones.
D
D
C
So
this
could
fill
that
need,
so
that
was
one
bug
I
put
in
and
this
one's
Consortium
me.
So
this
one
I
talked
about
at
the
web
does
thing.
I
think
is
highlighting
the
logged
in
library
on
the
at
an
item
screen
and
I
can
show
this
one
because
I've
I've
faked
it
with
jQuery
about
and
I
I
put
the
jQuery
in
the
bug.
If
anybody's
interested
that.
C
C
D
C
A
C
So
they
can
just
see
the
Highlight
click,
the
Highlight
click
edit
and
then,
while
I'm
sharing
my
screen
I
figured
out
how
to
import
it.
This
is
not
cataloging
related,
but
it
could
be.
I've
been
playing
with
confetti,
so
I
found
a
confetti
library
and
you
can
use
emojis
and
you
can
tie
it
to
anything.
I
was
really
excited
about
this
yesterday,
so
I
thought
I
would
share.
Oh.
A
C
B
B
E
Foreign,
so
I'm
working
through
my
item
type
project
and
I
was
good
at
my
thought
was
to
use
the
Frameworks
because
that's
easy
basic
editor,
you
just
it
auto,
would
populate
some
of
these
fields
and
I
can't
remember
which
item
type
I
was
working
on,
but
I
needed.
It
has
multiple
Fields
with
information.
E
Does
it
like
I
need
it
to
be
simple,
like
I
I've,
even
thought
about?
Okay,
if
I
do
the
batch
modification
and
set
that
up,
but
that's
not
going
to
help
my
beginner
cataloger
who's
coming
in
I,
don't
want
them
to
have
to
go
somewhere
to
copy
the
information,
because
the
chances
of
that
happening
decrease
are.
A
E
Know
they're
just
RDA
so
I
found
well.
They
they
seem
to
be
somewhat
so
like
for
video.
It
shares
if
it's
mono
or
stereo
or
analog
or
melodic,
or
the
format
and
I'm
like
I,
can
we're
an
international
if
they
can
put
that
in
that's
helpful.
Even
if
I
like
you
know
some
of
them
it's
either
or
just
erase
the
one
that
yours
isn't
and
if
they're
both
there
then
I
know
they.
E
A
A
I
mean
I
am
I,
am
all
for
thorough,
full
level.
Machine
readable,
go
there
if
you
can,
but
if
but,
if
you're
talking
a
real
basic
catalog
or
wanting
to
get
it
right,
I
would
say
the
I
readable,
300
field
is
the
most
important
and
then
perhaps
there
could
be
automated
processes
to
review
and
make
agreement
in
the
record.
A
C
Like
on
my
default
framework,
344
is
repeatable,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
it'll,
like
you,
have
to
add
that
field
and
put
something
in
it
before
it'll
show
up
again.
Oh
a
second
time,
I.
Don't
think
that
you
can
I
mean
I.
Guess
you
get
that
some
default
values,
but
it
would
still
only
give
you
one
until
you
add
another
one.
A
A
very
old
school
hack
that
I've
seen
done
is
rather
than
giving
your
basic
cataloging
staff
a
blank
record
or
a
blank
work
form.
You
give
them
a
default
record
and
you
tell
them
that
you
are
always
going
to
open
this
suppressed
default,
bib
record
and
you're
going
to
copy
it
and
then
you're
going
to
edit
that
one
it
it
again.
E
Could
that
be
a
bug
to
heaven?
How
ought
to
somehow
connect
that
with
your
framework,
like
it's
a
I'm
wanting
a
template
a
morning,
basically
a
template
that
all
they
do
is
select
the
template
and
it
Auto
puts
in
the
majority,
or
even
it
puts
minutes
to
remind
me
that
I'm
supposed
to
look
up
a
minute.
A
Don't
see
why
that
couldn't
happen,
a
template
could
be
a
thing
existing
between
the
framework
and
the
bib
record,
and
that
could
be
something
that
a
library
could
choose
to
turn
on
and
to
create
templates
I,
don't
know
why
that
couldn't
happen.
You
write
that
bug
and
in
the
meantime
you
could
create
these
default
naked
bib
records.
That
245
is
that
field.
A
title
proper
said
field
B
subtitle
and
they
just
replace
that
text
300
so
I
field,
a
minutes.
B
B
Okay,
so
you
could
have
well
I
would
do
my
programmable
programmable
keypad
to
automatically
fill
in
all
the
information.
Just
going
to
your
first
record
hit
this
button
fills
in
everything
or
there's.
The
macro
puts
I'm
sure
there's
an
easier
way,
but
this
is
what
I
would
do
if
I
had
to
have
it
today.
B
E
B
A
A
B
A
Well
before
we
go
I'm
going
to
say
that
I'm
going
to
be
asking
coha
us
if
I
could
host
an
extra
cataloging,
Sig,
probably
quarterly
in
the
afternoon,
so
we
could
get
people
who
can't
make
it
in
the
morning.
It's
going
to
be
an
experiment,
I'm
going
to
be
finding
a
Time
and
stay
tuned
for
that
in
2023
and
stay
tuned
for
our
great
fantastic
Omnibus.
Linking
entry
field
bug
that
I'm
gonna
appreciate
all
y'all's
input
on
and
if
you're
celebrating
winter
holidays
May
they
be
merry
and
a
Happy
New
Year
to
everyone.