►
From YouTube: ContribEx: Bi-Weekly Update 20200226
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
B
Planning
doesn't
begin
until
the
1st
of
March,
so
nothing
to
report.
We
had
a
really
great
participation
this
time
around
a
little
bit
under
February
I.
Do
want
to
do
a
shout
out,
though,
for
those
of
you
listening
on
the
record
the
entire
afternoon.
West
Coast
session
was
entirely
with
new
people,
so
this
it
actually
pulled
it
off.
We
didn't
eat
I,
didn't
even
notice.
They
were
all
new
to
the
very
end.
B
You
know
we
had
kind
of
planned
I'm
having
experienced
people
kind
of
mentoring,
new
people,
but
these
people
they
just
showed
up
and
nailed
it.
So
I
thought
it
was
a
great
success
so
that
I'm
moving
on
community
meeting
that
planning
steps
with
Matt
Bromberg
on
the
first
he's
going
to
be
the
host
for
March.
First,
nothing
really
new
to
report
there.
A
A
A
A
It's
been
kind
of
frustrating
because
actively
contributing
to
the
upstream
kubernetes
project
is
apparently
I,
won't,
say
difficult,
but
confusing
people
so
and
that
there's
been
a
fair
amount
of
back-and-forth
for
the
most
part
like
the
majority
of
our
attendance
is
organ
burrs
anyway,
it's
usually
like
around
90%
and
everyone
else
is
mostly
involved
with
a
cig,
so
I,
don't
think
it'll
be
too
big
of
a
problem.
It's
just
to
help
take
care
of
some
of
the
frustrating
edge
cases.
A
D
A
B
A
D
E
A
A
A
A
B
B
The
time
to
do
it,
he
wants
to
do
it
as
an
episode
of
T
gik,
where
we
kind
of
grab
that
page
shove
it
in
a
hack,
MD,
and
then
we
kind
of
have
a
bunch
of
people
fix
it
and
then,
at
the
end
of
the
episode
we
like
commit
it,
but
there's
also
a
long
term
maintenance
that,
like
we
can't
just
have
an
episode
and
commit
a
bunch
of
stuff
like
we'd,
have
to
go
back
and
fix
it.
And
things
like
that.
So
you
know,
but
we
definitely
are
very
interested
in
doing
it.
A
A
G
Can
somebody
actually,
if
somebody,
the
other
thing
I
would
suggest,
is
if
somebody
can
actually
break
out
specific
section?
You
know
its
name,
sections
that
need
review.
I
can
probably
do
that
name,
sections
they
need
review
and
then
share
it
out
with
ke
dev
and
some
of
their
developer
sources,
because
we're
saying
hey,
you
know
we
need
somebody
to
just
review
this
one
page
we're
a
lot
more
likely
to
get
somebody
to
do
that
when
they're
on
a
boring
conference
call
or
something
yeah.
A
A
It's
a
good
chunk
of
them,
like
I,
can
go
through
and
index
them
a
bit
more.
It's
just
I
know
for
some
of
them.
They
do
need
a
bit
more
domain
knowledge
about
some
of
the
areas.
A
good
example
was
most
recently
like
the
the
the
testing
one
had
references
to
you,
like
you
know
the
hacky
tui.
Instead
of
the
the
cube
test,
and
then
there
was
still
a
bunch
of
references
to
vagrant
which
hasn't
been,
you
know,
supported
in
quite
a
while
yeah,
actually.
G
D
G
B
A
A
A
It's
just
adding
a
section
to
the
event
section
and
actually
like
making
contributes
on
that
page.
So
we'll
have
like
a
nice
little
thing
for
past
events
and
future
events,
and
eventually
this
will
probably
the
case
for
like
Boston.
We
will
not
use
the
Linux
Foundation
pages
we
will
just
have
you
know
you'll,
be
able
to
go
to
the
contributor
or
contributor
site,
and
that
will
have
all
our
event
info.
We
will
100%
control
it,
so
we
have
to
make
you
know
emergency
changes
or
anything
like
that,
we'll
be
able
to
do
it.
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
H
F
A
A
A
A
A
E
A
B
So
I'd,
you
know,
I
didn't
want
to
like
panic,
everybody
or
anything,
but
you
know
as
I
say
news.
You
know
about
possibilities
of
canceling
stuff
just
want
to
let
just
kind
of
maybe
brainstorm
if
this
were
to
happen.
For
some
reason,
some
people
can't
go
to
Amsterdam
or
whatever
I
think
we
could
probably
pull
off
like
a
day's
worth
of
content.
B
If,
if
something
like
this
were
to
happen,
maybe
asking
people
who
signed
up
for
contributor
summit
presentations-
you
know
I
was
thinking
we
could
schedule
like
five
of
them
in
YouTube,
right
Chris
would
take.
Some
I
would
take
some
so
that
we
could
do
them
back-to-back
timewise
on
the
channel
and
then
maybe
we
could.
If
it
comes
down
to
that
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know,
I've
been
doing
a
little
preparation,
we
could
possibly
pull
off.
You
know
a
day's
worth
of
content
streaming
people's
presentations
and
things
like
that.
If,
if
possible,.
F
B
C
B
F
B
B
B
A
C
C
B
I
was
looking
at
the
contributor
summit.
You
know
the
people
who
submitted
box,
you
know
if
I
we
were
to
do
is
like
per
course
dream.
There
were
their
presentations.
That
just
say
you
know
here
they
are
just
schedule
them
in
YouTube
ahead
of
time,
so
people
can
listen
live.
We
could
probably
bust
it
out.
If
that's
a
thing,
I,
don't
think
it
will
be
worth
trying
to
do
something
like
so
we
did
this
in
a
boon
to
in
the
past.
B
When
we
switched
over
to
a
virtual
format
is
we
would
actually
try
to
run
the
sessions
that
we
would
at
a
real
conference
via
zoom
like
actual
workshops
and
stuff,
but
that
seems
that
seems
a
bridge
too
far
for
me,
I
think,
just
you
know.
If
we
had
planned
talks
that
people
were
already
writing
anyway,
so
my
kidding,
they
haven't
written
their
slides
well,.
C
B
A
A
The
next
time
I
just
want
to
bring
to
people's
attention.
There
is
a
issue
triage
kept
regarding
a
lot
of
the
like.
This
is
some
labels
that
are
being
applied,
and
things
like
that,
and
this
is
the
culmination
of
lots
of
other
discussions
and
OH
issues
and
it's
a
sort
of
AI
realistically,
don't
think
it'll
happen
for
her
1:19
just
because
there
needs
to
be
more
communication
and
and
get
like
a
game
plan
like
and
everything
very
spelled
out
locked
in
beforehand.
A
A
A
A
A
A
Okay,
that
one
yeah
I
knocked
out
a
few
of
these
earlier
today
or
not
today.
Yesterday,
yeah
I
think
we.
A
If
there's
a
couple
left
open
items
in
here
that,
if
anyone
wants
to
you,
take
on
like
just
making
sure
that
the
like
links
and
cigs
that
well
are
still
valid,
that'd
be
very
helpful.
It
shouldn't
take
like
individually,
they
shouldn't
take
too
long.
It's
just
sort
of
going
through
and
not
gonna
mount.
A
B
A
So
you
want
to
take
a
look
at
this,
like
I'm,
also
removed
some
of
the
stuff
that
we
talked
about
the
slack
stuff
and
then
put
in
notes
regarding
the
dev
stats
now
having
repo
crew
dashboard.
So
we
can
check
the
repo
groups
and
then
there's
another
one.
That's
just
been
automated
away
yeah.
So.
G
Yeah
and
I
also
looked
into
some
of
this,
the
one
of
the
problems
that
we
have,
so
there
were
actually
two
questions.
One
was
about
removing
unused
channels
and
the
second
was
you
know,
looking
at
potentially
auditing
unused
old
accounts,
those
people
who
registered
never
posted
anything,
and
that
was
two
years
ago.
G
F
G
G
A
Yet
if
you
want
just
it's
currently
the
top
one
and
the
PR,
if
you
want
to
take
a
look.
Okay
for
and
I
updated,
the
like
the
purpose,
pin
documents
and
the
dentist
thing
to
just
be
essentially
to
have
it
be
optional
but
like
it
should
really
just
be
for
essentially
the
community
groups,
so
SIG's
working
groups
and
like
committees,
yeah.
G
But
him
I
got
to
you
knew
that
I
didn't
got
buried
in
event
prep,
when
I'm
feeling
less
buried
do
I
want
to
start
up
an
effort
to
just
catalog
our
channels,
because
I
think
there
actually
are
a
lot
of
channels
that
could
use
a
pinned
explanation
document
and
don't
have
one
because
nobody's
gotten
around
to
it.
So
and
even
if
we're
not
purging
channels
that
are
idle,
it
would
be
at
least
useful
to
know
what
we
have.
G
A
B
I
feel
a
lot
of
the
community
like
the
sick
ones,
in
particular,
probably
wouldn't
hurt
during
one
of
these
chair,
co-lead,
newsletters
or
whatever
be
like
here
are
some
tips
on
pinning
your
most
important
items
in
your
channel.
It's
helped
you.
F
B
The
some
of
the
ones
that
are
really
well
maintained,
they
say,
hey,
ask
here
these
questions.
If
you
don't
get
a
response
go
here,
you
know
you
go
to
the
pin
channels.
They're
like
read
these
before
you
ask
questions
kind
of
stuff,
so
there's
probably
a
lot
of
best
practice.
That's
the
word
I'm
looking
for
so.