►
From YouTube: ContribEx: Bi Weekly Meeting 20200506
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
There
we
go,
we
are
now
recording
I
will
drop
the
link
to
the
agenda
in
the
chat
and,
if
you
could
toss
your
name
on
the
attendees
list
that
would
be
great
today
is
May
6th,
and
this
is
the
bi-weekly
Kendra
Beck's
meeting
I
am
Bob
Dylan
one
of
the
chairs
of
computer
experience
and,
like
all
our
other
meetings,
this
we
abide
by
the
C
and
C
of
code
of
conduct,
which
essentially
boils
down
to
you.
Please
be
excellent
to
each
other.
A
B
An
update
for
that
I
can
talk
about
it.
Okay,
we
have
an
English
team
office
hours
planned
for
maybe
the
first
week
of
June.
If
there's
no
big
push
back,
we
contacted
six
net
Signet
work.
We
have
two
panelists
that
will
help
us
facilitate
that.
But
if
people
from
sick
country
Rex
or
the
usual
office
hours
panelists
want
to
join,
we
are
more
than
happy.
A
A
Well,
the
sleepover
that
for
now,
regarding
the
contributor
summits,
we
have
actually
decided
to
cancel
the
EU
contributor
summit.
A
lot
of
people
are
experiencing
virtual
sort
of
event
fatigue
and
with
it
so
close
to
Boston,
it
just
didn't
make
sense
to
run
it.
We
will
still
host
a
virtual
new
contributor
workshop,
but
that
will
not
be
like
budding
up
right
against
the
actual
cube
con
event.
That
will
be
I.
Think
we're
targeting.
C
C
A
D
A
We
actually
had
like
one
of
the
the
biggest
things
we
debated
back
when
coming
up
with
the
documentation
style
guide
is
that
we
would
stick
at
least
to
you
something
like
ET
or
PT,
essentially,
something
that
travels
with
daylight
savings
time
just
to
save
from
having
to
like.
There
are
so
many
dates
and
times
throughout
the
entire
project
you'd
be
going
in
there
and
having
to
update
it
like
all
over
the
place,
so
the
that
that
was
sort
of
the
the
main
thinking
behind
that.
A
D
F
Should
do
a
poll
like
I,
don't
know
if
we've
ever
actually
measured
the
community
as
far
as
like
preference,
you
know
what
I
mean
I,
don't
know.
I'm
just
curious
cuz,
like
I,
am
I'm
on
team,
whatever
the
community
needs
right
like
if
that
means
I'm
converting
like
so
be
it
kind
of
thing,
but
I
actually
don't
know.
F
F
G
If
we
do
a
poll,
it
has
to
come
with
a
lot
of
explanations,
because
I
think
a
lot
of
people
a
lot
of
people
fundamentally
don't
understand
the
way
the
time
zones
work.
A
lot
of
people
don't
realize
that
UTC
doesn't
change
with
daylight
savings
time.
A
lot
of
people
also
don't
realize
that
you
know
which
country's
switch
to
daylight
savings
time
and
which
places
don't
like
most
of
us.
You
know:
I
live
in
Europe.
Most
of
us,
mostly
European
countries,
have
daylight
savings
time.
It
just
happens
to
change
on
a
different
date.
G
G
H
Curious,
what
the
actual
wording
that
we
got
into
the
style
guide
was
because
I
remember
it
slightly
differently.
If
I
remember
it
correctly,
it's
used
whatever
time
zone
that
you're
sig
is
deciding
the
meeting
is
going
to
be
in
so
that
tracks.
Daylight
savings
then
use
a
time
zone
that
tracks
daylight
savings.
If
it
doesn't,
then
don't
cuz
I
think
we
just
left
it
up
to
the
sig
to
the
side
like
what
time
zone
they
would
be
based
out
of
and
whether
it
would
track
daylight
savings
or
not,
but
hey.
A
Have
I
actually
have
it?
Have
it
up
right
here
times
for
single
events
such
as
keep
con
should
be
expressed
in
the
absolute
time
zone
such
as
specifics
their
time
or
you
know,
UTC
for
the
specific
event,
since
that's
happening
in
a
region,
and
everyone
will
essentially
be
on
that
clock
times
for
reoccurring.
Events
should
be
expressed
in
timezone
that
follows
daylight
savings
time,
such
as
Pacific
time
or
Eastern
time,
and
either
way
we
ask
people
to
supply
a
link
to
a
time
zone
converter
just
a.
I
Quick
note:
we've
been
talking
about
following
daylight
savings
time
and
for
you,
northern
hemisphere,
ian's.
All
of
you
move
together
for
all
of
us
in
the
southern
hemisphere.
It
means
my
staff
can't
wake
up
early
enough
to
attend
the
meetings
that
are
pinned
in
northern
hemisphere,
II
in
daylight
savings
time
and
I.
Don't
think
I've
heard
that
in
the
conversation.
B
B
I
D
A
H
Like
so
I
guess,
there's
two
questions
here
and-
and
maybe
this
goes
toward
I'll
direct
this
towards
Jonas
since
he
raised
the
issue
initially.
Are
we
talking
about
specifically
concerns
around
contributor
experiences,
meetings
and
contributor
experience
time
zones,
or
are
we
talking
about
the
general
guidance
that
we
give
to
all
SIG's
or
how
they
represent
their
meetings
and
stuff
in
documentation?
Or
is
it
both.
D
A
F
F
A
H
H
A
H
Yeah
I
I
think,
if
we're
talking
about
like
just
contributor
experience
meetings,
then
like
basically
my
opinion
is
I,
don't
care
whatever
the
group
ends
up
wanting
as
far
as
scheduling
and
stuff
is
concerned.
I
it
gets
tricky
with.
You
know
like.
There
isn't
necessarily
a
way
to
win
in
this
like.
If
we
pin
it
to
North
American
DST,
then
there
will
be
parts
of
the
world
that
are,
you
know,
have
multi
hour,
offsets
from
it.
H
If
we
pin
it
to
UTC,
then
as
countries
that
do
observe
daylight
savings
time
shift
their
schedules,
then
we're
gonna
run
into
conflicts.
Anyways
cuz
there'll
be
some
meetings
that
move
some
meetings
that
don't
and
where
it
worked
after
year.
Now
it
doesn't
work
the
other
half
of
the
year,
so
I
don't
think,
there's
necessarily
a
way
to
win,
but
I
guess
my
general
feeling
is.
If
we're
deciding,
we
need
to
make
a
decision
for
contra
backs
shorter,
but
I.
Don't
think
that
we
should
decide
even
like
really
make
recommendations
to
others.
H
Things
like
this
is
gonna
be
a
question
that
every
sink
kind
of
has
to
figure
out.
What's
the
best
situation
for
themselves
based
on
their
audience
and
then
just
hopefully
record
it
in
a
similar
way,
so
I
would
even
be
like
I
would
be
Pro
changing
some
of
our
style
guide
wording
to
explicitly
say
like
hey.
G
D
Really
like
how
you
order
a
crest
off,
because
the
six
are
pretty
much
autonomous
as
well,
they
they
are
supposed
to
take
decisions
by
themselves,
just
make
sure
it's
properly
recorded.
So
we
can
provide
hey,
here's
the
template,
here's
how
you
should
Ward
it!
Here's
how
you
you
handle
your
meetings
and
give
them
a
few
options,
and
just
let
them
pick.
D
D
F
30
people,
30
people,
concurrently
or
30,
wait
something
like
75,
uniques
and
yeah
I.
Don't
remember
the
numbers,
but
yes,
I'm
like
75
uniques,
so
not
bad,
but
we
usually
see
hundred
plus
but
and
as
far
as
the
second
one
is
concerned,
know
that
we're
here
I
still
need
to
figure
out
the
second
time.
I
have
a
ton
of
hosts
that
have
offered
to
do
evening.
J
J
He
and
he
F
is
Priscilla
race
with
China's
fastest
here,
and
we
have
a
few
Democratic
to
give
areas
and
also
some
good
news
about
community
bridge
the
different
mentorship
program,
which
is
similar
to
Google's
fourth
coat,
but
driven
by
Linux
Foundation.
We
are
at
the
stage
when
potential
mentees
are
applying
for
participating
in
this
program
and
we
have
also
slots
available
for
the
players.
So
given
a
dis
is
listed
on
the
left
side
and
people
can
stand
up
ladder.
A
A
A
So
this
one
is
probably
going
to
you
like
I'm
gonna
fire,
something
off
to
our
list
about
this.
I
am
in
meetings
the
rest
the
day,
so
it'll
probably
be
tomorrow,
but
we
have
an
open
issue.
I'll
go
find
it
about
stale
org
members
and
after
doing
a
little
bit
of
auditing
looking
at
our
member
activity,
we
have
roughly
150
people
that
have
had
zero
act
like
activity
across
any
other
Carre's
orgs
in
the
past
18
months.
So
that's
since
the
111
release.
A
A
We
did
have
the
idea
to
potentially
like
these
people
that
are
removed
if
they
become
active
again
being
able
to
like
sort
of
shortcut
our
normal.
You
know
membership
procedure
where
you
have
to
have
like
two
sponsors.
So
essentially,
like
you
know,
if
you
show
yourself
as
active
again,
then
you
know
okay
cool.
We
can,
we
can
add
you.
H
One
question
that
I
kind
of
asked:
broadly
it
for
opinions
on,
is:
do
we
necessarily
need
a
shortcut
process
at
all,
the
reason
being,
like
the
reason
that
this
comes
up
is
we
want
to
make
it
easy
for
people
to
rejoin,
but
also,
at
the
same
time
like
our
bar
for
Ord
membership
is
already
very
low,
and
if
you
are
active
again,
finding
two
sponsors
shouldn't
be
it
shouldn't
be
difficult.
Shouldn't
shouldn't
be
too
difficult,
so
it
comes
down
to
like
dude.
Do
we
need
to
necessarily
modify
that
process
and
add
that
shortcut
yen?
H
K
Yeah
I
think
I
I
personally,
like
what
you
suggest
Christoph,
you
know,
keeping
it
simple,
keep
it
as
what
we
have
today
right.
The
other
thought
that
do
are
we
giving
any
notification
to
folks
which
are
inactive?
You,
like
you,
know,
that's
more
like
an
issues
stall
right
that
hey,
you
are
not
active,
and
you
know
if
you're
not
getting
back
to
active
and
within
certain
time
frame
you
will
be
removed
as
a
narc
member.
A
K
A
B
B
A
Like
we,
don't
really
have
a
mapping
of
like
person
to
cig
easily
outside
of
like
looking
at
owner's
files.
This
would
remove
about
40
people
from
owner's
files.
But
to
be
honest,
if
they're
in
an
owner's
file-
and
they
haven't
had
any
activity
in
a
year
and
a
half,
then
they
should
probably
be
removed
from
the
owners
file
altogether.
A
B
Like
there
was
a
discussion,
I
think
I,
don't
know
anyone
about
like
having
some
kind
of
automatic
moderation
happening
when
you
first
right
guys.
It
said
basically
educating
the
people
and
I
wanted
to
have
something
how
we
can
do
it,
but
there's
also
like
a
lot
of
issues
that
have
one
store,
Estelle
and
repository
and
I'm
just
wondering
what
kind
of
issues
we
wanna
tackle
will
cease.
Tech
infrastructure.
Are
we
currently
in
a
safe?
Where
we
are
happy,
then
we
don't
need
to
do
anything
or
do
we
want
to?
B
A
It's
it's
mostly
like
so
slacking
furrow
was
largely
maintained
by
one
person
and
she
has
now
while
she's
still
like
you
know
a
part
of
the
project.
Her
main
responsibility
is
not
the
project,
so
it's
sort
of
been
one
of
the
you
know
what
we
have
works
and
the
other
things
are
all
very
like
nice
to
have.
But
it's
sort
of
been
like
low-hanging.
Fruit
isn't
necessarily
the
the
right
word
for
it.
It's
just
that
wasn't
the
the
highest
priority
at
the
time.
It
would
be
nice
to
have
right.
B
But,
for
example,
the
gender
based
motivators,
which
falls
back
to
feature
that
was
announced
to
me
in
January.
This
may
be
still
interesting
and
maybe
something
we
still
want
to
have
so
I'm.
Just
like
wondering
now
that
when
I
know,
we
definitely
want
to
have
right
except
no
issue
for
it.
So
I
don't
know
why
to
find
it
but
message
her
okay,
I.
A
A
Okay
considered
documentation,
there
isn't
a
huge
update
here
for
the
computer
guide
for
the
developer
guide.
We
did
submit
a
season
of
Docs
request.
This
is
to
hopefully
get
a
tech
writer
to
help
us
improve
our
developer
guide.
I've
linked
the
sort
of
brief
description
there.
If
anyone
is
interested.
A
No
updates
from
the
non
code
guide
on
the
computer
site
were
actually
pretty
far
along
now,
with
converting
it
over
to
doc,
see
the
pr
is
actually
installed.
It's
in
a
state
ready
to
be
merged
but
discovered
a
small
bug
in
github,
and
it
not
displaying
the
commits
correctly,
and
so
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
from
from
them
on
that
one
before
I,
you
know
merge
it.
L
M
M
A
I
M
M
Yeah
we
can
do
whenever
it's
just
be
like
a
short-term
week
or
two
from
now
or
within
the
next
week
or
two
like
what
I
could
do
is
even
draft
to
flow
is
I,
perceive
it
and
see
like
okay.
Does
this
match
reality?
And
then
it's
just
one
step
farther
along
in
that
process
of
bringing
the
threads
together.
M
A
With
that
now
we
are
at
our
open
mic
discussions
and
the
first
sort
of
elf
in
the
room.
One
was
the
discussion
about
potentially
moving
back
to
a
weekly
cadence
on
our
meetings
with
the
general
goal
of
having
them
be
shorter
and
people
not
feeling
like
they
miss
everything
if
they
happen
to
miss
out
on
a
meeting.
A
C
A
The
other,
like
part
of
the
reason
we
were
talking
about
potentially
folding,
like
going
back
to
the
weekly
cadence,
is
actually
folding
or
cancelling
some
of
our
other
meetings
that
haven't
been
very
well
attended
and
sort
of
the
the
pattern
that's
happened
is
because
there's
another
meeting
it
just
sort
of
zooms
things
are,
like
things
are
being
done
in
that
meeting,
they
aren't,
you
know
necessarily
getting
bubbled
up
with
them
being
a
part
of
our
main
meeting.
You
know
we
potentially
surface
them
more
and
get
more.
People
engage
with
them.
F
Yeah
I
was
just
gonna
say
if
we
went
weekly,
which
I'm
not
necessarily
a
fan
of,
but
I
would
like
to
like
point
conversations
then
meaning
not
do
stand-up
every
week
do
stand-up
bi-weekly
and
some
project
owners,
bi-weekly
and
then
some
kind
of
discussion
topic
so
that
folks
don't
feel
especially
some
project
owners
don't
feel
like
they
have
to
come
every
week,
but
I
felt
that
something
like
that
would
be
my
suggestion.
Just
to
reduce
burnout.
A
Yeah
some
of
the
stuff,
so
we
at
the
last
meeting
towards
the
tail
end
and
I
wanted
going
over
to
issue
triage.
We
are
start
talking
about
different
ideas
to
sort
of
tackle
that,
like
you
know,
a
lot
of
the
stand-up
B
type
stuff
it
it
might
not
even
necessarily
to
be
talked
about
if
it's
all
in
the
agenda-
or
you
know
especially
call
out
things
that
people
want
to
talk
about.
M
A
I'll
do
that
right
now:
okay!
So
while
you
do
that,
just
because
we're
we
have
18
minutes,
left
I'm
gonna,
move
on
to
the
next
item,
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
it.
I
think,
as
you
yeah.
You
have
another
item
in
here,
so
the
next
time
Paris.
You
brought
this
to
my
attention
and
just
like
the
the
cigs,
aren't
currently
meeting
the
government's
requirements
of
doing
the
quarterly
update,
and
this
includes
contribu
missed
this
one
too.
A
While
we
do
while
we
are
standard
update
before
was
the
community
meeting
or
having
them,
you
know
weekly
and
we
got
through
all
the
cigs.
You
know
like
every
quarter,
maybe
it
still
as
a
part
of
the
the
community
meeting
responsibility
to
ping
these
things
that
need
to
have
their.
You
know
sort
of
update
do
that
month,
but
only
some
of
them
are
actually
reporting
in
personal
in
like
during
the
community
meeting
and
then
the
other
is
essentially
have
their
presentation
or
something
like
that.
Attached
to
the
list.
F
No
I
would
love
to
hear
them,
though
yeah
I,
some
data
so
and
I
know
Chris
also
on
the
call
to-
and
this
is
something
that
we
we
don't
talk
about,
this
very
specific
issue
in
steering
so
to
speak.
But
we've
been
talking
about
larger
something
larger,
but
ya
know
I
noticed
that
you
know
only
I
think
three
SIG's
emailed
an
update
last
quarter
to
ke
dev
and
since
we've
reduced
those
meetings,
that's
also
reduced
their
reminders
for
to
do
those
things.
So
we
need
to
figure
out.
F
Some
kind
of
you
know
added
improvement
to
either
remind
SIG's
or
something,
and
it
would
just
be
nice,
in
my
opinion,
if
we
had
some
kind
of
document
that
collected
updates
on
a
monthly
basis
and
kind
of
like
I
would
I
see
four
Apache
like
Apache
projects,
like
these
report
pages,
for
instance,
and
then
you
can
go
in
and
click
them
one
like
a
quarterly
basis
and
see
what's
up
with
them.
So
like
we
have
all
of
that
stuff.
C
M
F
F
Let
me
let
me
Lauri,
let
me
have
you
look
at
the
the
deck
template
that
we
do
mm-hmm
sure
it's
clearly
and
I
agree
with
you
by
the
way
so
I'm
saying
you
got
that
fresh
eye
that
I,
like
so
look
at
the
template
and
maybe
yeah
I.
M
F
M
Yeah,
the
dark,
I
shared
is
just
trying
to
bring
the
marketing
team
kind
of
around
to
that
like.
If
you
click
at
the
link
just
that
it
shows
it
creates
a
template
like
the
ideas,
they
would
call
a
copy
and
paste.
You
know
their
status
updates
straight
into
an
email,
and
then
it
gives
them
the
template
for,
like
the
planning.
You
know
they
can
click
link
by
link
from
the
table
down
to
like
another
template
for
note-taking
and
discussion,
but
yeah.
M
N
M
M
F
Community
meeting
that
we
used
to
have
every
Thursday
I
mean
we
would
have
three.
We
can
cycle
through
three
to
four
community
groups
in
one
meeting,
which
meant
we
were
getting,
we
were
like
the
governance
requirements
which
was
getting
met,
naturally
because
they
were
just
flowing
now
that
it's
once
a
month
because
we're
trying
to
do
a
nice
thing
and
you
know,
reduce
the
burden.
That
also
means
that
only
three
six
a
month
instead
of
twelve
yeah
so
means
eight
SIG's
have
to
just
naturally,
you
know
have
some
kind
of
natural
inclination
yep,
you
hey.
F
F
A
F
It's
just
an
email
reminder
to
say
no,
oh,
no,
take
like
it's
a
little
like
reminder
optional.
You
know
optional,
not
required
that
says.
Did
you
submit
your
quarterly
update?
I
mean
you
need
something
that
simple
maybe
would
suffice
for
now,
but
right
now
we
just
have
like
a
gap
right
there,
where
it's
like
we
just
expect
chairs
to
like
magically.
Think.
Oh
it's
my
time.
I
M
O
A
So
actually
Laurie
you
have
an
update
on
the
PR
velocity
and
if
you.
M
Yeah
most
of
this
is
documented,
and
most
of
you
are
see
seed,
somehow
on
most
of
the
things
that
I've
been
doing
so
I
don't
want
to
I.
Don't
really
need
to
go
over
that.
The
only
topic
for
discussion
would
be
like
I
made.
The
requests
yesterday
on
the
dev
stats
for
a
number
of
dashboard
adjustments,
and
so
then
this
kind
of
raises
the
question.
So
I
saw
that
Akash
actually
see
seed,
Josh
and
Dan
Cohen.
M
So
Josh
can
comment,
as
is
you
know
when
he
has
time,
but
maybe
the
question
there,
it's
just
like
there's
a
the
reason
for
the
dashboard
requests
is
like
I'm,
still
a
little
ignorant
on
every
detail,
but
basically
you
have
community
management
and
you
have
a
certain
set
of
metrics
that
you're
looking
for
for
community
management,
and
then
you
also
want
to
have
metrics
around
workflow.
You
want
to
be
able
to
identify
like,
in
the
our
case,
stakes
whose
workflows
may
need
improvement,
and
so
the
requests
that
I
pitched
yesterday
does
some
comparative
analysis.
M
It's
it's
meant
to
simplify
like
how
you
can
get
some
of
the
key
metrics
sig
by
sig
and
I
pulled
up
the
issue
here:
up
drop
it
in
the
chat.
So,
basically,
as
far
as
I
can
tell
from
my
usage
of
the
distance,
you
have
to
go
through
repo
groups
and
look
up
specific
SIG's,
and
then
you
get
a
bunch
of
metrics
related
to
them
and
what
I'm
looking
for
is
sig
just
saying
how
are
you
doing
block
yours?
How
are
you,
how
are
your
workflows
comparing
to
each
other?
M
So
that's
that's
meant
to
actually
you
know
behind
the
scenes,
examine
problems
in
the
system
like
you-know-who,
how
these
teams
compared
to
comparing
to
each
other,
and
then,
where
do
we
see
a
heavy
workflow,
her
workload
that
we
would
like
to
prioritize?
Okay,
helping
a
sake
reduce
that
workload,
because
it's
an
impediment
and
all
the
data
is
roughly
there,
but
you
just
kind
of
have
to
manually
put
it
together
like
that's.
Why
I
created
that
a
spreadsheet
with
it?
You.
M
A
C
Ip
addresses
that
had
actually
you
know
that
I'd
actually
done
more
than
then
hit
the
home
page,
and
it
was
a
very
narrow
set
of
IP
addresses.
C
M
M
Would
you
like
to
see
that
data
and
everybody
said
yes,
and
then
that
was
it
except
for
a
few
cases,
and
so
there
is
interests
I,
wonder
if
there's
just
too
many
metrics
for
these
folks
to
actually
even
parse
there,
a
lot
of
metrics
and
they're
all
useful
for
different
audiences,
but
maybe
we
want
to
pull
out
some
specific
one
like
if
you're
responsible
for
workflow.
For
your
sake,
what
are
the
metrics
that
you
need
to
know
to
understand
how
your
sig
is
performing
potentially.
I
A
M
M
You
know
if
you
have
a
bunch
of
priority
urgent
issues
and
I
mean
nobody
does
right
now.
So
as
far
as
I
can
see.
So
that's
good,
but
if
you
had
five
right,
what
are
you
gonna
do
with
that
stuff?
You
want
to
see
the
number
and
then
you
would
prioritize
acting
on
those
to
get
them
out
of
out
of
here
in
a
box
and
into
their
release,
because
I
think
that's
what
they're
dependent
on
the
classified
is
urgent
for
the
release
coming
up.
C
C
C
M
Some
of
them
for
sure
github
query
would
be
the
best
approach.
There's
enough,
some
of
them
some
of
the
metrics,
maybe
not
and
I.
Think
if
you're
also
like,
if
you're
the
steering
committee
or
you're,
trying
to
get
the
overall
picture
of
how
things
are
doing
where
they
might
need
help,
then
those
overall
comparative
metrics
can
be
useful,
and
you
could
also
tell
the
story
a
lot
more
immediately
than
like
doing
a
manual
search.
You
know
like
going
in
a
specific
date
and
time
using
github,
pulling
queries
getting
some
numbers
and
then
showing
it
see.
M
Yeah
I
think
we
could
have
a
really
interesting
discussion
like
what
are
those
three
metrics
that
points
you
like.
What
do
we
think
of
the
most
important
ones
for
showing
and
telling
the
story
of
PR
velocity,
where
it's
doing
where
it's
going
well,
where
it
might
need
help
and
giving
them
just
three
things
to
look
at
and
then
the
rest
of
us
can
look
at
the
30
things
to
look
at,
because
we
like
these
numbers
and
as.
M
I
Won't
be
interesting
to
look
at
some
of
the
stuff
we're
doing
with
API.
Still
we
have
some
data
metrics
that
we
use
collect,
PR
velocity
and
it's
a
complicated
process
because
it
starts
off
with
trying
to
identify
the
possible
pieces
of
things.
We
want
the
test
and
having
any
session,
to
think
about
that
and
then
going
during
creating
a
test
from
scratch
based
on
the
conversation
and
then
promoting
it,
so
that
we're
talking
about
process
and
flow
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
that
maybe
it's
been
some
time
showing
you
some
of
the
tooling.
E
M
N
M
A
M
F
F
I
You
if
I
want
to
collaborate
like
github
project,
it
automatically
oopps
me
back
into
the
thing.
It
says:
oh
I'm,
so
glad
to
see
you
here
today
and
then,
of
course,
demos
being
what
they
do.
It
didn't
work,
so
I'll
run
this
again
and
it's
just
a
real,
simple
interface.
It
says
who
do
you
want?
What
do
you
want?
Who
do
you
want
to
code
with
today?
And
you
put
it
a
list
of
those
people
I'm?
Currently
the
AWS
key,
because
this
is
Amazon
base.
I
You
actually
just
paste
it
in
here,
and
the
HTTP
request
goes
through
I
think
it
is
sent
to
the
server,
but
it's
not
saved
anywhere
and
it
just
redirects
to
create
the
instance
and
we
ought
to
set
up
all
of
the
things
for
the
region.
I've
minimized
it
to
just
do
Sydney,
because
that's
near
me,
and
we
ought
to
set
up
ami
what's
fun-
is
that
instance
gets
spun
up
and
go
back
to
our
mentoring.
Don't
know!
I
What's
over
here
the
code
underneath
it
is
in
the
sharing
neo
or
sharing
IO
repo,
like
that
I
created
reward.
It's
based
on
some
techno
Mansi
stuff
that
they
did
a
while
back,
and
it
was
inspired
by
some
software
on
pair
io,
so
setting
up
your
own,
we
could
Coover
notify
this.
This
was
back.
The
project
currently
is
set
up
to
deploy
to
Heroku,
so
we're
super
super
close
to
being
there,
and
if
we
go
back
to
how
it
sets
things
up,
it
actually
uses
for
your
user.
You
set
up
your
own
preferences
in
Diggs.
I
What
it
allows
when
you're
done
is
it
displays
please
SSH
to
pairing
or
I
I
act,
this
new
box,
and
it
sets
up
DNS
and
everything,
and
then
you
just
run
teammate
to
connect,
so
it
allows
people
who
may
not
know
each
other
yet
find
a
safe
middle
ground
to
do
some
pairing
on
encoding
on
and
although
right
now,
this
defaults
to
using
things
like
teammate
and
RT
MUX,
which
is
a
terminal
based
SSH
thing.
There's
no
reason
we
couldn't
bring
up
like
Microsoft
vs
code
or
things.
I
I
F
Okay,
well
yeah.
Let's
we
can
talk
about
that
at
another
meeting.
I
was
just
curious
to
you
to
where
you,
where
you
were
with
that.
So
when
we,
what
do
you
feel
like
you
need
from
us
like?
What
do
you
feel
like
is
like
lingering
or
or
unanswered
or
stuff
like
that?
It
we're?
What
who.
I
I
mean
right
now:
AWS
donates
some
resources
for
and
right
now,
I've
got
an
account.
That's
through
the
CNC
F
for
API,
snoop
and
I'm.
Doing
some
of
this
work
on
there
because
I'm
actively
doing
some
separation
with
it,
it
would
be.
Where
would
we
like
this
stuff
to
go?
Can
we?
What
is
it
who
wants
to
own
the
the
running
like
the
infrastructure
portion
of
that?
Is
it
seeing
CFD?
I
F
First
step
here
is
owners
of
the
mentorian
folder,
as
well
as
the
sig
chairs,
and
the
tech
leaves
need
to
get
together
to
decide
on
a
if
the
thing
needs
funding,
and
so
what
your
next
step
is
should
be
is
how
much
like
what
are
we
talking
about
here?
Give
us
some
hardcore
information
there,
and
then
we
have
a
steering
committee
process
that
has
a
has
a
like
a
process.
That's
already
been
established
with
CN
CF
and
that's
how
we
get
funding
for
kubernetes,
so,
like
security
audits,
all
that
fun
stuff
too.
F
So
this
would
come
from
there.
So,
but
ultimately,
steering
would
say
is
the
sink
cool
with
this,
and
usually
they
get
that
from
like
a
tech
lead
or
something
like
that
so
either.
If
you
want
to
start
on
the
contra
backs
mailing
list
or
in
the
mentorian
some
project
meeting,
and
then
we
finish
it
off
here
and
then
we
put
in
the
formal
request
to
steering
that's
the
funding.
So
steering's
gonna
say
things
like
you
know
why?
F
Why
that
one
cloud
or
like,
can
we
do
multi
cloud
like
they'll,
like
they'll,
say
like
a
bunch
of
different
like
things
so
as
far
as
like
pricing
is
concerned,
give
options
just
like
kind
of
like
you
know,
make
it
a
little
bit
of
a
proposal,
but
not
that
fierce.
You
know
nothing
serious,
but
like
everything
that
you
would
that
you
would
see
and
like
that,
we
would
ask
questions
for
so
other
things.
They're,
probably
gonna
want
to
know
is
like
how
many
people
tried
this
so
I.
F
Think
that's
another
good
step
for
you
is
to
get
more
folks
to
adopt
this,
especially
cigs,
who
are
or
of
the
more
of
the
vertical
cigs,
and
you
know
maybe
like
arch,
if
you
want
to
do
it
in
arch,
because
you're
active
there
and
that
might
be
a
good
fit
for
you
or
some
other
sig
that
don't
you
have
like
an
ally
in
that.
Can
that
can
kind
of
try
to
adopt
this
so
I?
F
F
I
also
wanted
to
circle
back
with
you,
and
we
do
have
a
small
crew.
Now
is
I.
Do
want
to
talk
about
the
time
zone
thing
again,
I
don't
necessary
to
stand.
We
didn't
necessarily
leave
it
on
a
good
tip
with
you
personally
hippy,
so
I
wanted
to
circle
back
with
you,
because
you
did
involve
a
little
bit
more
of
another
scope
to
the
initial
question
and
yours
was
more
about.
Hey
I
have
other
people
that
want
to
join.
So
my
question
to
you
is:
are
you?
F
I
I
Bring
it
up
much
anymore,
because
I've
accepted
that
this
is
the
land
we
live
in,
but
when
I
see
the
ciencia
adopting
a
across
the
board
thing
that
says
our
meetings
will
now
beep
into
G&T
makes
me
go.
Oh
maybe
it
is
possible
that
we
can
make
community-wide
things
that
are
are
like
that
and
I
I
was
a
little
late
to
the
game.
I
didn't
see
that
so
I
put
in
our
notes.
I
The
C&C
ftse
mailing
list,
meeting
and
I
thought
wow,
that's
super
cool
and
then
it
was
brought
up
again
in
the
meeting
and
that's
like
cool.
Maybe
this
is
the
time
to
talk
about
how
painful
it
is
because
some
of
my
team
are
they
really
like
routine
as
I'm
sure
all
of
us
do
and
I
I
was
a
week
and
it's
a
meeting.
It's
not
six
and
Trebek's.
It's
our
the
main
meeting
that
we
do
for
writing
tests.
It's
our
sig
architecture,
conformance
subgroup,
project
meeting
and
it
swings
two
hours
and
so
I
when
I.
I
F
This
is
why,
okay
with
this
being
a
reoccurring
conversation,
that's
why
I'm
not
like
I
say
jokingly.
Oh
my
we've
talked
about
to
say
time
to
launched
here,
but
I
mean
serious
because
we
do
have
other
players
that
come
into
the
fold,
so
that's
the
and
that
my
thing
for
you
is
especially
in
a
sub
group
setting
right,
which
is
much
smaller
than
like
when,
when
were
like
Oh
GMT
for
a
community
meeting
of
5,000
like
the
sub-project
like
do
a
doodle
put
out
a
quick
doodle
y'all.
F
Will
you
take
a
doodle
really
quick
just
to
be
like?
Do
you
like,
hey,
appease
me
and
then
what
leezard?
What
your
doodle
should
be,
though
it
shouldn't,
it
should
be
y'all's
times
that
of
availability.
So
you
know
obvious
a
window
and
a
range
right.
Somebody
not
like
two
to
three
times
but
like
stuff
that
you
know
it's
gonna
work
for
you
and
just
say:
hey
just
appease
me
and
take
this
doodle.
F
They
do
think
it's
because,
like
oh,
these
are
the
people
that
are
showing
up
so
therefore
they're
doing
the
work.
But
that
might
not
be
the
case.
So
that's
and
that's
why
we
did
an
AIPAC
meeting
right
so
be
able
to
swing
some
other
people
into
an
idea
of
having
a
second
meeting
and
keeping
it
a
sync.
F
So
I
mean
there's
a
couple
things
that
you
can
do
and
I'm
sorry
that
the
work
is
on
YouTube,
but
I
think
you
could
really
help
us
leave
the
wave
here
and
maybe
just
kind
of
like
start
those
conversations.
That's
like
there's
some
project
levels
of
hey.
Excuse
me.
We
take
this.
Doodle
I
really
have
other
folks
that
want
to
join
and
actually
do
the
work
but
they're
burnt
out
or
you
know,
don't
you
don't
even
have
to
say
burnt
out,
but
you
know
I
don't
want
to.
F
You
know
lead
them
to
a
burnout
stage,
but
they
actually
want
to
do
work
and
some
project
owners
I
feel
like
they
have
to.
We
have
to
appease
to
that,
because
I
want
people
to
do
the
work
right.
So,
like
that's
my
take.
Thank
you,
this
yeah,
and
so
the
same
thing
here
so
I
want
to
internalize
that
a
little
bit,
especially
with
the
mentorian
meeting
and
I'm
glad
that
conversation
is
going
on
so
and
thank
you
for
giving
your
feedback
as
well
there,
but
those
are
late.
F
I
feel
like
that's
what
the
that's
a
good
level
of
things
that
we
can
change
and
then
once
that,
like
kind
of
that's
kind
of,
in
my
opinion,
like
a
little
bit
of
a
bubble
of
change,
because
then,
once
the
sig
chair
see
that
all
of
these
other
you
know
sub
projects
have
these
global
times.
Then
maybe
we
should
start
thinking
about
that
from
a
like
an
umbrella,
Singh
perspective
right.
F
So
change
could
probably
happen
at
that
grassroots
level
as
well,
which
will
give
like
chairs
more
of
a
pulse
because
right
now
chairs,
don't
have
that
pulse
and
that's
something
that
like
Laurie,
was
also
talking
about
earlier
with
just
other
things,
but
there's
no
that
pulse.
So
that's
why
it's
like.
Oh
well,
I
mean
everybody's
here
and
we
have
15
people.
So
that's
really
good.
F
So,
like
that's
kind
of
what
chairs
or
are
looking
at
so
having,
that
kind
of
like
pulse
would
be
super
helpful,
even
if
it's
just
quick,
doodles
and
you're
like
hey,
this
doesn't
mean
we're
changing
the
meeting.
Can
you
just
take
a
quick
doodle
for
me
to
see
you
know?
I
want
to
get
a
pulse
to
see
if
these
times
are
still
good
for
everybody.
C
Was
gonna
say,
there's
already
several
cigs
that
do
have
around-the-clock
meetings,
I
mean
six
scheduling
is
a
late
meeting.
Sig
Network
has
a
late
meeting
the
there
they're,
not
all
cigs
and
I-
think
a
lot
of
it
comes
down
to,
for
example,
which
cigs
have
a
chair
or
a
TL
and
a
pack,
and
then
those
SIG's
tend
to
have
you
know,
meetings
on
both
yeah.
I
F
You
doing
a
lot
of
the
organizing
anyway.
That's
what
that's
and
that's
the
thing
about
like
chair
hood
ship,
whatever
it's
called
it's
like
it's
supposed
to
be
chair,
I
mean
it's
supposed
to
be
shared
like
that's.
Why
I
don't
like
seeing
groups
with
just
one
chair
because
I'm
like
gosh,
you,
poor
soul,
like
folks.
F
Do
that's
their
look
at
the
sink
charter?
Okay,
yeah,
look
at
this
a
charter
and
I
know,
but
I
also
think
you
should
really
tell
them
to
like
the
chairs
like
hey
I
would
like
to
be
at
some
point
a
chair
or
tell
me
what
y'all
want
me
to
do,
because
I
want
to
help
you
and
that,
like
to
Josh's,
point,
is
a
great
way
to
make
that
change
like
just
in
a
natural
way.
Yeah.
I
N
I
M
E
B
M
Alright,
no
guys
the
reason
behind
this
template
is
that
I
see
a
lot
of
groups,
teams,
etc
in
life,
have
sinks,
and
then
they
just
kind
of
report
status
and
then
it's
a
meeting
to
come
to
a
reporting
meeting.
I'm,
not
a
planning
and
strategy
meeting,
and
so
the
way
that
this
template
is
framed
is
to
try
to
drive
the
planning
and
strategy.
So
when
you
get
a
bunch
of
people
together
in
a
meeting
what
for
what
are
they?
What
are
they
to
do?
Ideally
to
plan?
Give
feedback
brainstorm,
build
team
team
eNOS?
M
So
that's
what
the
emphasis
on
finding
is
for,
but
it's
still
important
to
report
what
they've
done
so
this
Gooden
space
to
do
this
not
only
to
each
other
but
then
to
the
community
at
large
and
then
there's
also
the
question
about
like
what
are
the
priorities?
You
know,
what
are
you
actually
doing
something
to
achieve?
Is
your
vision,
clear.